BACTERIOLOGY PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM

Similar documents
BactiReg3 Event Notes Module Page(s) 4-9 (TUL) Page 1 of 21

Mark Your Calendars Now! Next Event Ships: September 14, 2015

New Opportunities for Microbiology Labs to Add Value to Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

Guidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System

Background and Plan of Analysis

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

Gram-positive cocci Staphylococci and Streptococcia

Policy # MI_ENT Department of Microbiology. Page Quality Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

Please distribute a copy of this information to each provider in your organization.

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

تقارير الدروس العملية

UNDERSTANDING YOUR DATA: THE ANTIBIOGRAM

Vitek QC Sets. Vitek 2 Identification QC Sets

Safety and Accuracy Assessment of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Platforms for the Detection of Biological Threats

Pathogens commonly isolated from selected diseases

EUCAST Workshop: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with EUCAST breakpoints and methods

Classification of Bacteria

Department Of Pathology MIC Collection Guidelines - Gastrointestinal (GI) Specimens Version#4 POLICY NO.

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of CP-99,219, a Novel Azabicyclo-Naphthyridone

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

Study Type of PCR Primers Identified microorganisms

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY CURRENT METHODS IN ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING

C&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 2013 December 2015

on February 12, 2018 by guest

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

What s new in EUCAST methods?

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Rapid Rewards. Identification from Positive Blood Cultures

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

Labquality External Quality Assesment Programmes General Bacteriology 1 3/2010

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

Antibiotic Resistance in the European Union Associated with Therapeutic use of Veterinary Medicines

QUICK REFERENCE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.)

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter EURL AR activities in framework of the new EU regulation Lina Cavaco

Service Delivery and Safety Department World Health Organization, Headquarters

Aetiological Study on Pneumonia in Camel (Camelus dromedarius) and in vitro Antibacterial Sensitivity Pattern of the Isolates

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

CultiControl. Technical Sheet 01

Antibiotic Update 2.0, 2017

Parts of Subject. Bacteriology. Virology. Parasitology and Mycology

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing challenges. Linda Joyce St Vincent s Hospital Melbourne

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Course: Microbiology in Health and Disease

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Medical bacteriology Lecture 8. Streptococcal Diseases

Course: Microbiology in Health and Disease Office Hours: Before or after Class or by appointment

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

Bovine Mastitis Products for Microbiological Analysis

USA Product Label CLINTABS TABLETS. Virbac. brand of clindamycin hydrochloride tablets. ANADA # , Approved by FDA DESCRIPTION

UNDERSTANDING THE ANTIBIOGRAM

Leveraging the Lab and Microbiology Department to Optimize Stewardship

SOFT Movement Survey of FMT Programs

Liofilchem Chromatic Chromogenic culture media for microbial identification and for the screening of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms

microbiology testing services

Can we trust the Xpert?

n Am I B I A U n IVE RS ITV OF SCIEnCE AnD TECH n 0 LOGY

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

Comparative In Vitro Activity of Prulifloxacin against Bacteria Isolated from Hospitalized Patients at Siriraj Hospital

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

BIOL 2900 D 4.00 Microbiology in Health/Disease

CME/SAM. Validation and Implementation of the GeneXpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay in a Pediatric Setting

METHODS FOR THE ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE DETECTION IN MICROORGANSIMS ISOLATED FROM FOOD

Practical approach to Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and quality control

M45: INFREQUENTLY ISOLATED OR FASTIDIOUS BACTERIA

Prevalence, quantity and antibiotic resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica in response to antibiotic use early in the cattle feeding period

Determination of antibiotic sensitivities by the

Bacteriology. Mycology. Genova Diagnostics Europe Parkgate House 356 West Barnes Lane New Malden, Surrey. KT3 6NB. Order Number:

Interpretation At-a-Glance

Block Objectives: Basic Infectious Diseases Block

Antimicrobial susceptibility

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Clinical Policy: Clindamycin (Cleocin) Reference Number: CP.HNMC.08 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: Medicaid - HNMC

MICROBIOLOGY of RAW MILK

1/30/ Division of Disease Control and Health Protection. Division of Disease Control and Health Protection

SAMPLE. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals

Anaerobe bakterier og resistens. Ulrik Stenz Justesen Klinisk Mikrobiologisk Afdeling Odense Universitetshospital Odense, Denmark

IV Antibiotics for Lyme Disease (Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime sodium, Doxycycline, Penicillin G potassium)

Validation of the PathoProof TM Mastitis PCR Assay for Bacterial Identification from Milk Recording Samples

RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF RESISTANCE MECHANISMS

PROTOCOL for serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella test strains

Role of the nurse in diagnosing infection: The right sample, every time

COURSE SYLLABUS. (Clinical Bacteriology-1

ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF LACTIC ACID BACTERIA PRODUCING ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDS FROM SMALL INTESTINE OF CHICKEN

Evaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test System

INFECTION PREVENTION SILVER ANTI-MICROBIAL TEXTILES

Transcription:

BACTERIOLOGY PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM Comprehensive Category January 20, 2015 If you have any questions or comments, please contact either: Dr. Wendy Archinal Dr. Kimberlee Musser Phone: (518) 474-4177 Email: bacti@wadsworth.org

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page General Information on the Bacteriology PT Program 1 Notes of Interest 2 Online Instructions and Worksheets 2 Bacteriology Questionnaires 2 EPTRS Reporting Tips 2 NYS Reportable Disease List 2 Samples for Remediation 2 Answer Key 4 Critique Specimen Number 1 5 Specimen Number 2 6 Specimen Number 3 7 Specimen Number 4 8 Antibiotic susceptibility results 9 Specimen Number 5 11 Chlamydia Direct Detection 12 Group A Streptococcus - Direct Detection 13 Bacterial Identification by Participating Laboratories 14

Bacteriology Proficiency Testing Program GENERAL INFORMATION The Bacteriology Proficiency Testing Program. Three proficiency testing events are given annually, each consisting of a minimum of five specimens. In order to successfully complete a test event, participating laboratories must achieve a score of 80% or greater. Unsuccessful performance in the testing program is defined as a score of less than 80% on two of three consecutive test events. Authentication. The presence and identity of the organism(s) in each specimen must be confirmed by at least 80% of the referee or participating laboratories. Referee laboratories are selected from New York State participating laboratories (located throughout the State) with acceptable and reproducible levels of performance. Grading System. Laboratories are to process proficiency test specimens in the same manner as patient specimens. Thus, laboratories are responsible for identifying test isolates to the same level as performed on patient isolates. If your laboratory speciates an organism on special request, then you must also speciate it in the proficiency test; consider speciation to have been requested on all reportable isolates. In addition, laboratories are not responsible for culturing any test samples from specimen sources which they do not process. Information regarding your laboratory s reporting protocol was provided to us in the questionnaire previously distributed to all laboratories. Any changes in reporting protocol must be received by our office prior to the mailout date for proficiency testing for that information to be considered in grading. Our testing format is in compliance with Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services guidelines as specified in the regulations of CLIA 88. One-half of our samples require identification of all organisms present. The other half requires that only the pathogenic organism(s) be reported. We recognize the potential for any organism to be pathogenic depending on the clinical condition of the patient. However, our samples are designed so that only well-established pathogens should be reported. Tests are graded in adherence to CMS guidelines, as specified in the regulations of CLIA 88. Each of the specimens receives a score as determined by the following formula: (a + b)/(c + d + e) x 100% a = # correct identifications b = # correct antibiotic susceptibility results (if applicable) c = # possible identifications d = # possible antibiotic susceptibility results (if applicable) e = # additional organisms reported Grades for each sample are then averaged to determine the final grade for this testing event. Disclaimer The use of brand and/or trade names in this report does not constitute an endorsement of the products on the part of the Wadsworth Center or the New York State Department of Health. 1

Notes of Interest Reminder Proficiency test samples must be handled just like patient samples, to the extent possible. If you perform testing using one system on patient samples DO NOT use additional systems on proficiency samples. Several laboratories are reporting the use of multiple systems/methods to identify organisms or perform susceptibility tests. Unless you are using multiple systems on patient samples you must not do so on proficiency samples. A few laboratories are reporting both an MIC and a zone diameter for susceptibility results. Unless you are testing patient isolates using both a disk diffusion AND MIC method do not test proficiency samples using both methods. Online Instructions and Worksheets The instructions and worksheets for Bacteriology proficiency testing are available at the New York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center website at http://www.wadsworth.org/divisions/infdis/bacti/worksheets.htm. Please bookmark this site to easily find the directions for the mailouts. Contact information Please make sure that CLEP has the correct email addresses for your laboratory contact people. On occasion we need to notify you of an issue with a sample and this is done by email. Bacteriology Questionnaires Please update your questionnaire whenever there is a change in your laboratory s reporting policy. Proficiency test results are graded in accordance with information on the questionnaire so be certain that this information is accurate. If your questionnaire indicates that your laboratory reports an organism to the species level then you must report to the species level on the proficiency test to receive credit. If you need a copy of your questionnaire for review, please contact our office at 518-474-4177 or email us at bacti@wadsworth.org. Grades will not be revised due to incorrect information on the questionnaire. EPTRS Reporting Tips When entering results into EPTRS if you can t find what you want in the drop down list you can select other and a text box appears for you to type in your response. Make sure you have pop-ups enabled in your browser. NYS Reportable Disease List The New York State Reportable Disease List can be found at: http://www.wadsworth.org/labcert/regaffairs/clinical/commdiseaseguide.pdf Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute Labs performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be using the latest CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing document. Samples for Remediation We maintain a limited number of samples for remediation purposes. If your laboratory had difficulty isolating or identifying the organisms in a sample you can contact us after the event for additional samples. Contact us either by email or phone and provide your PFI number and the sample(s) needed. They will be shipped to you within a week. 2

January 20, 2015 Test Event Number of Participating Laboratories: 187 Did not return results: 2 Grade Distribution Score Number Percent 100% 161 87.0 90 99% 7 3.8 80 89% 15 8.1 <80% 2 1.1 3

BACTERIOLOGY - COMPREHENSIVE January 20, 2015 ANSWER KEY Specimen Number 1 - Stool (Pathogens only) No enteric pathogens (not authenticated) Specimen Number 2 Throat (Pathogens only) Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Streptococcus) Specimen Number 3 Pelvic abscess - Aerobic / Anaerobic (All organisms) Peptostreptococcus anaerobius No aerobic organisms Specimen Number 4 - Blood (All organisms) and Antibiotic Susceptibility Listeria monocytogenes Susceptibility to: Ampicillin susceptible TMP/SMX susceptible Specimen Number 5 Vaginal swab (Pathogens only) Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus) Chlamydia Direct Detection - Cervix Positive for Chlamydia trachomatis Group A Streptococcus Direct Antigen Detection - Throat Negative for Group A Streptococcus 4

Specimen Number 1 - Stool (Pathogens Only) Correct response No enteric pathogens Organisms included: Escherichia coli O157:H7 (non-toxigenic), Escherichia coli & Enterobacter cloacae In order to detect enterotoxigenic E. coli, CDC recommends that clinical laboratories culture stool specimens from patients with acute diarrhea using selective and differential agar. In addition, these stool specimens should be examined using an assay that detects Shiga toxin or the genes that encode the toxin. Results reported for specimen # 1 Result Method # Labs Escherichia coli, serotype O157:H7 biomerieux Vitek 2 GN 14 Siemens (Dade Behring) Negative Combo - any panel 6 Remel Rim Ecoli0157:H7 6 biomerieux API 20E 4 Conventional biochemicals 3 Wellcolex E.coli 0157:H7 1 OXOID DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS E. COLI 0157 LATEX 1 biomerieux Vitek 1 GNI + 1 BD Phoenix Gram Negative ID 1 ChromAgar and latex 1 Escherichia coli O157 biomerieux Vitek 2 GN 34 Siemens (Dade Behring) Negative Combo - any panel 22 Oxoid E.coli 0157 latex 5 Pro-Lab Prolex E. coli 0157 Latex Kit 4 biomerieux API 20E 4 Conventional biochemicals 4 Remel RIM E.coli O157:H7 1 Bruker MALDI-TOF 1 Remel Escherichia coli antisera O157 1 BD Phoenix Gram Negative ID 1 Escherichia coli, sorbitol-negative Siemens (Dade Behring) Negative Combo - any panel 4 biomerieux Vitek 2 GN 1 biomerieux API 20E 1 Escherichia coli Remel RapID ONE 1 MALDI-TOF 1 No enteric pathogens isolated 42 No Salmonella, Shigella or Campylobacter species Isolated 2 Culture Negative for Vibrio species and Yersinia enterocolitica 1 Staphylococcus aureus Fisher Healthcare SureVue Color Staph 1 Specimen source not tested 16 Additional organisms reported Enterobacter cloacae biomerieux Vitek 2 GN 1 MALDI-TOF 1 Remel RapID ONE 1 Escherichia coli biomerieux Vitek 2 GN 1 5

Specimen Number 2 Throat (Pathogens only) Correct response Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Streptococcus) Additional organisms included Citrobacter freundii* & Staphylococcus epidermidis *Several laboratories reported Citrobacter freundii as a pathogen in this throat sample this response was ignored in the grading of the test. Results reported for specimen # 2 Result Method # Labs Streptococcus, group A (S. pyogenes) Remel Streptex 44 BD BBL Streptocard 33 DPC PathoDX Strep Grouping 27 Conventional biochemicals 25 biomerieux Vitek 2 GP 18 Siemens (Dade Behring) Positive Combo - any panel 6 biomerieux Vitek MS 4 Hardy Diagnostics StrepPRO 4 Remel PathoDx Strep Grouping Kit 3 Pro-Lab Diagnostics Prolex Staph latex 2 BD BBL Taxo A disc 2 MALDI-TOF 2 Boule Diagnostics Phadebact Streptococcus 2 Bacitracin Susceptibility 2 Not given 1 BD Phoenix Gram Positive ID 1 biomerieux API 20 Strep 1 Bruker MALDI-TOF 1 SSA PLATE AND BACITRACIN DISC 1 Remel Bacitracin (Tox A) Disk 1 Pro-Lab Diagnostics Prolex Strep 1 biomerieux API 20E 1 Specimen source not tested 3 Additional organisms reported Citrobacter freundii biomerieux Vitek 2 GN 8 Siemens (Dade Behring) Negative Combo - any panel 3 biomerieux API 20E 1 MALDI-TOF (biomerieux Vitek MS) 1 BD Phoenix Gram Negative ID 1 Remel RapID ONE 1 Citrobacter freundii complex MALDI-TOF 1 Citrobacter species MALDI-TOF MS 1 Staphylococcus epidermidis biomerieux Vitek 2 GP 1 Staphylococcus, coagulase negative Conventional biochemicals 1 Fisher Healthcare SureVue Color Staph 1 6

Specimen Number 3 Pelvic abscess - Aerobic/Anaerobic (All organisms) Correct response Peptostreptococcus anaerobius Results reported for specimen # 3 Sample Result Method # Labs 3 Peptostreptococcus anaerobius Remel RapID ANA II 68 biomerieux Vitek 2 ANC 37 Siemens (Dade Behring) MicroScan Rapid Anaerobe 11 biomerieux Vitek MS (MALDI-TOF) 5 MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry 5 biomerieux API 20A 4 biomerieux API Rapid ID 32A 2 Conventional biochemicals 2 Bruker MALDI-TOF 1 biomerieux Vitek 1 ANI 1 biomerieux Vitek 2 Anaerobic Corynebacterium ID 1 Remel RapID NH 1 Peptostreptococcus species Remel RapID ANA II 7 biomerieux API 20A 6 Conventional biochemicals 4 biomerieux Vitek 2 ANC 2 BD BBL Crystal Anaerobe 1 Siemens (Dade Behring) MicroScan Rapid Anaerobe 1 Anaerobic gram positive cocci 9 Anaerobic gram negative cocci 1 No growth 2 Clostridium bifermentans biomerieux API 20A 1 Eggerthella lenta (Eubacterium lentum) Siemens (Dade Behring) MicroScan Rapid Anaerobe 1 Siemens (Dade Behring) MicroScan Rapid Anaerobe 1 Eubacterium species Neisseria gonorrhoeae Siemens (Dade Behring) MicroScan HNID 1 No anaerobic organisms 1 No Bifidobacterium sp. isolated 1 Anaerobe not tested for the source 1 No Bifidobacterium spp; No Clostridium spp; No Bacteroides fragilis group 1 No aerobic organisms 3 Specimen source not tested 3 Additional organisms reported Enterobacter cloacae biomerieux Vitek 2 GN 1 Anaerobic gram negative bacilli Remel RapID ANA II 1 Enterobacter cloacae Siemens (Dade Behring) Negative Combo - any panel 1 Escherichia coli Siemens (Dade Behring) Negative Combo - any panel 1 7

Specimen Number 4 - Blood (Pathogens only) and Antibiotic susceptibility Correct response Listeria monocytogenes Ampicillin susceptible TMP/SMX susceptible Established guidelines are available for susceptibility testing of fastidious organisms and organisms that are infrequently isolated in The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document, Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated Fastidious Bacteria; Approved Guideline Second Edition (M45-A2) 1. This document provides directions and guidance to clinical microbiology laboratories for the standardized susceptibility testing of L. monocytogenes by broth microdilution that are not presently included in other CLSI documents such as M02 or M07 1. Commercial susceptibility testing devices are not specifically addressed by M45-A2 2. Clinical labs can refer to Table 11 on page 29 of this document for L. monocytogenes susceptibility testing information and interpretive criteria. Clinical labs that reported susceptibility results by the broth microdilution method are advised to adhere to the breakpoints established in this document. Currently, there are no CLSI guidelines available for other susceptibility test methods. 1. CLSI. Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated Fastidious Bacteria; Approved Guideline Second Edition. CLSI document M45-A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010. 2. DOI: 10.1309/LM3ILTL0TCE3RFBT LABMEDICINE, Volume 42 Number 6, June 2011 Results reported for specimen # 4 Result Method # Labs Listeria monocytogenes biomerieux Vitek 2 GP 72 Siemens (Dade Behring) Positive Combo - any panel 50 Conventional biochemicals 16 biomerieux API Coryne 12 BD Phoenix Gram Positive ID 4 16s rdna sequencing 2 MALDI-TOF 4 biomerieux Vitek MS 2 API Coryne 1 Polymerase chain reaction 1 biomerieux Vitek MS - MALDI TOF 3 BD BBL Crystal Rapid Gram Positive 1 biomerieux API 20 Strep 1 biomerieux Vitek 2 GN 1 Bruker MALDI-TOF 1 biomerieux VITEK MS 1 MALDI-TOF MS 1 Listeria species Conventional biochemicals 1 biomerieux API Coryne 1 Gram positive bacillus 1 Specimen source not tested 9 8

Susceptibility testing results Result Method # Labs zone mic Ampicillin Susceptible MicroScan 27 <=2 10 <=0.25 6 <2 2 =0.25 1 =2 1 <1 1 =0.5 E-test 3 =0.25 3 =0.75 3 =0.5 2 =0.38 1 =2 1 =1 1 0.38 1 <=2.0 1 <2.0 Broth Microdilution 1 =0.25 1 =0.12 biomerieux Vitek 2 1 <=0.25 Agar Dilution 1 <=0.25 Trek Sensititre 1 =0.5 In house prepared frozen MIC 1 =0.5 Disk diffusion 2 26 1 32 1 30 1 25 Resistant 1 0 Test not performed 105 Susceptibility testing not performed 4 TMP/SMX Susceptible MicroScan 11 <=0.5/9.5 2 <=2/38 1 <=0.25 1 <=0.25/4.7 1 <0.5/9.5 1 =0.25 1 =5.0 E-test 3 =0.25 3 =0.19 2 =0.38 1 =0.50 1 =0.32 1 =0.023 1 =0.23 1 =0.125 1 =.50 9

Trek Sensititre 2 <=0.5 Broth microdilution 1 =0.06/1.2 1 <=0.12/2.4 biomerieux Vitek 2 1 <=10 Agar Dilution 1 <=0.5 Remel FAS MIC 1 <=0.5/9.5 In house prepared frozen MIC 1 =0.03/0.6 Disk diffusion 3 20 1 30 1 26 1 29 Intermediate E-test 1 =.75 No Interpretation Not given 2 No Interpretation MicroScan 2 Test not performed 130 Susceptibility testing not performed 4 10

Specimen Number 5 Vaginal swab (All organisms) Correct response Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus) Additional organism included Lactobacillus rhamnosus Results reported for specimen # 5 Result Method # Labs Streptococcus, group B (S. agalactiae) Remel Streptex 35 biomerieux Vitek 2 GP 33 BD BBL Streptocard 29 DPC PathoDX Strep Grouping 18 Siemens (Dade Behring) Positive Combo - any panel 16 Conventional biochemicals 10 Remel PathoDx Strep Grouping kit 6 biomerieux VITEK MS 6 biomerieux API 20 Strep 4 MALDI-TOF 3 Hardy Diagnostics Strep Pro Grouping Kit 3 Boule Diagnostics Phadebact Streptococcus 2 Bruker MALDI-TOF 1 Fisher Healthcare AccuStaph 1 BD Phoenix Gram Positive ID 1 Prolab Streptococcal latex grouping kit 1 Remel RapID ANA II 1 Not given 1 Pro-Lab Diagnostics Prolex Staph latex 1 Streptococcus anginosus DPC PathoDX Strep Grouping 1 No pathogens isolated 1 Specimen source not tested 11 Additional organisms reported Gardnerella vaginalis biomerieux API Coryne 2 Siemens (Dade Behring) MicroScan HNID 1 Actinomyces species biomerieux Vitek 2 ANC 1 Lactobacillus species Conventional biochemicals 1 MALDI-TOF 1 11

Chlamydia Urine/cervical swab for Direct Detection Methods This simulated cervical swab was provided to laboratories that test for Chlamydia using molecular detection methods. This sample was not suitable for laboratories performing antigen detection for Chlamydia or Chlamydia culture. This sample was positive for Chlamydia trachomatis and was reported as such by 99% of the participating laboratories that tested this specimen. This was a new sample type for our proficiency tests. It was provided as a urine sample or a swab sample already in transport media. Test kits used by laboratories processing this specimen Result Method # Labs Positive Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 53 Cepheid Xpert CT/NG 17 BD ProbeTec ET CT or CT/GC 10 BD Viper System 2 Roche Diagnostics COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG 2 Abbott RealTime CT/NG assay 1 Digene Hybrid Capture hc2 CT/GC 1 Laboratory Developed Test 1 Roche Diagnostics AMPLICOR CT/NG 1 Aptima Combo 2 - Panther 1 Negative Digene Hybrid Capture hc2 CT/GC 1 12

Group A Streptococcus Throat Swab for Direct Detection Methods This simulated throat swab was provided to all laboratories that process specimens for Group A Streptococcus using direct detection techniques. This specimen was reported as negative for Group A Streptococcus by 99% of the participating laboratories that processed it. Test kits used by laboratories processing this specimen Result Method # Labs Negative Acceava Strep A 15 Sekisui (Genzyme) OSOM Ultra Strep A 15 Sekisui (Genzyme) OSOM Strep A Test 8 Cardinal Health SP Brand Strep A Dipstick 8 BD Directigen EZ Strep A 7 BD Chek Group A Strep 7 Quidel QuickVue + Strep A 7 Abbott Signify Strep A Dipstick 5 Meridian Bioscience ImmunoCard STAT Strep A 5 Fisher Sure-Vue Signature Strep A Test 3 Fisher Sure-Vue Strep A Lateral Flow Test 3 Clearview Exact Strep A Dipstick 3 Stanbio QuStick Strep A Rapid Strip Test 2 GenProbe Group A Strep 2 Quidel Sofia Strep A FIA 2 Beckman Coulter Icon DS Strep A 1 Alere BinaxNow Strep A Card 1 Quidel QuickVue Inline Strep A 1 Signifiy Strep A dipstick 1 Polymedco Poly Stat Strep A 1 Beckman Coulter Icon SC Strep A 1 Henry Schein One Step + Strep A Dipstick 1 Quidel QuickVue Dipstick Strep A 1 Positive BD Veritor System for Rapid detection of Group A Strep 1 BD Chek Group A Strep 1 13

BACTERIAL IDENTIFICATION BY PARTICIPATING LABORATORIES Sample/Report # Labs % SPECIMEN NUMBER 1 (Stool) Escherichia coli, serotype O157:H7 38 20.5 Escherichia coli O157 77 41.6 Escherichia coli, sorbitol-negative 6 3.2 Escherichia coli 2 1.0 No enteric pathogens isolated 42 22.7 No Salmonella, Shigella or Campylobacter species isolated 2 1.0 Culture negative for Vibrio species and Yersinia enterocolitica 1 0.5 Staphylococcus aureus 1 0.5 Specimen source not tested 16 8.6 SPECIMEN NUMBER 2 (Throat) Streptococcus, Group A (S. pyogenes) 182 98.4 Specimen source not tested 3 1.6 SPECIMEN NUMBER 3 (Pelvic abscess) Peptostreptococcus anaerobius 138 74.6 Peptostreptococcus species 21 11.4 Anaerobic gram positive cocci 9 4.9 Anaerobic gram negative cocci 1 0.5 No growth 2 1.0 Clostridium bifermentans 1 0.5 Eggerthella lenta (Eubacterium lentum) 1 0.5 Eubacterium species 1 0.5 Neisseria gonorrhoeae 1 0.5 No anaerobic organisms 1 0.5 No Bifidobacterium species isolated 1 0.5 Anaerobe not tested for in this source 2 1.0 No Bifidobacterium spp., No Clostridium spp., No Bacteroides 0.5 fragilis group 1 No aerobic organisms 3 1.6 Specimen source not tested 3 1.6 SPECIMEN NUMBER 4 (Blood) Listeria monocytogenes 173 94 Listeria species 2 1.0 Gram positive bacillus 1 0.5 Specimen source not tested 9 4.9 SPECIMEN NUMBER 5 (Vaginal swab) Streptococcus, Group B (S. agalactiae) 172 93.0 Streptococcus anginosus 1 0.5 No pathogens isolated 1 0.5 Specimen source not tested 11 6.0 CHLAMYDIA DIRECT DETECTION (Cervix) Result # Labs % Positive for Chlamydia trachomatis 89 98.9 Negative for Chlamydia trachomatis 1 1.1 GROUP A STREPTOCOCCUS - DIRECT DETECTION (Throat) Negative for Group A Streptococcus 100 98.0 Positive for Group A Streptococcus 2 2.0 14