ANTI-ANAEROBIC ACTIVITIES OF SULOPENEM COMPARED TO SIX OTHER. Departments of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033

Similar documents
Piperacillin-Tazobactam, and Cefoxitin

Surveillance of susceptibility patterns in 1297 European and US anaerobic and capnophilic isolates to co-amoxiclav and five other antimicrobial agents

on February 12, 2018 by guest

SESSION XVI NEW ANTIBIOTICS

R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica, California 90404, 1 and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California

Patterns of Susceptibility to Fluoroquinolones Among Anaerobic Bacterial Isolates in the United States

AAC Revised. Activity of a Novel Cyclic Lipopeptide, CB-183,315 Against Resistant Clostridium difficile

In Vitro Activities of OPT-80 and Comparator Drugs against Intestinal Bacteria

Multicenter Study of Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Anaerobic Bacteria in Korea in 2012

Third Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria

Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria: Evaluation of the Redesigned (Version 96) biomérieux ATB ANA Device

Moxifloxacin resistance is prevalent among Bacteroides and Prevotella species in Greece

Anaerobic bacteria in 118 patients with deepspace head and neck infections from the University Hospital of Maxillofacial Surgery, Sofia, Bulgaria

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinically Relevant Gram-Positive Anaerobic Cocci Collected over a Three-Year Period in the Netherlands

Present Status of Therapy for Anaerobic Infections

ACCEPTED. Anaerobe Reference Laboratory, Department of Bacterial and Inflammatory Diseases, National

Keywords: CB-183,315; Clostridium difficile; susceptibility; intestinal anaerobes

Multicenter Study of In Vitro Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis Group, 1995 to 1996, with Comparison of Resistance Trends from 1990 to 1996

against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria

Antimicrobial Resistance in Human Oral and Intestinal Anaerobic Microfloras

Lessons Learned from the Anaerobe Survey: Historical Perspective and Review of the Most Recent Data ( )

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

Intra-abdominal infections: review of the bacteriology, antimicrobial susceptibility and the role of ertapenem in their therapy

USA Product Label CLINTABS TABLETS. Virbac. brand of clindamycin hydrochloride tablets. ANADA # , Approved by FDA DESCRIPTION

Ciprofloxacin, Enoxacin, and Ofloxacin against Aerobic and

SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE BIPHASIC MIXED INFECTION

Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Anaerobic Bloodstream Infections: A 10 Years Study

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Resistance pattern of anaerobic bacteria isolated in a general hospital during a two-year period

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Anaerobic Bacterial Clinical Isolates From 2014 to 2016, Including Recently Named or Renamed Species

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

Fluoroquinolones and Anaerobes

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Bacteroides fragilis Group Organisms Recovered from 2009 to 2012 in a Korean Hospital

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

Clindamycin Palmitate Hydrochloride for Oral Solution, USP (Pediatric)

Antibiotic Updates: Part II

Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics

EUCAST-and CLSI potency NEO-SENSITABS

Anaerobe bakterier og resistens. Ulrik Stenz Justesen Klinisk Mikrobiologisk Afdeling Odense Universitetshospital Odense, Denmark

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of CP-99,219, a Novel Azabicyclo-Naphthyridone

Labeled Uses: Acute Skin & Skin Structure Infections caused by susceptible bacteria 1,2,4

Original Article. Ratri Hortiwakul, M.Sc.*, Pantip Chayakul, M.D.*, Natnicha Ingviya, B.Sc.**

Chapter Anaerobic infections (individual fields): intraperitoneal infections (acute peritonitis, hepatobiliary infections, etc.

Secondary bacterial infections complicating skin lesions

Tel: Fax:

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Antimicrobials. Antimicrobials

Pinni Meedha Mojutho Ammanu Dengina Koduku Part 1 Kama Kathalu

Antibiotic Abyss. Discussion Points. MRSA Treatment Guidelines

Susceptibility of Respiratory Tract Anaerobes to Orally Administered Penicillins and Cephalosporins

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Received: February 29, 2008 Revised: July 22, 2008 Accepted: August 4, 2008

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

ORIGINAL ARTICLE /j x. Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA and 3 Wockhardt Research Centre, Aurangabad, India

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates in Europe: 20 years of experience

ECOLOGICAL IMPACT OF NARROW SPECTRUM ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS COMPARED TO BROAD SPECTRUM AGENTS ON THE HUMAN INTESTINAL MICROFLORA CARL ERIK NORD

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Cleocin Pediatric clindamycin palmitate hydrochloride for oral solution, USP

CLEOCIN HCl Capsules contain clindamycin hydrochloride equivalent to 75 mg, 150 mg, or 300 mg of clindamycin.

THERAPY OF ANAEROBIC INFECTIONS LUNG ABSCESS BRAIN ABSCESS

Marc Decramer 3. Respiratory Division, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

Title: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) Mediated Modulation of Bacterial Antibiotic

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Available online at ISSN No:

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

Clindamycin versus Phenoxymethylpenicillin in the Treatment of Acute Orofacial Infections

Resistance of anaerobic bacteria. Can we find any clinical impact? Szeged ESCMID School 2005

National Clinical Guideline Centre Pneumonia Diagnosis and management of community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults

Antibiotics & treatment of Acute Bcterial Sinusitis. Walid Reda Product Manager. Do your antimicrobial options meet your needs?

.'URRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEA. VOLUME 66, NUMBER 3, MAY/JuNE 2005

BactiReg3 Event Notes Module Page(s) 4-9 (TUL) Page 1 of 21

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing challenges. Linda Joyce St Vincent s Hospital Melbourne

Other Beta - lactam Antibiotics

The prevalence of antibiotic resistance in anaerobic bacteria isolated from patients with skin infections Research Article

after trauma in children

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Epidemiology and Microbiology of Surgical Wound Infections

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Beta-lactams 1 รศ. พญ. มาล ยา มโนรถ ภาคว ชาเภส ชว ทยา. Beta-Lactam Antibiotics. 1. Penicillins 2. Cephalosporins 3. Monobactams 4.

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Annual Report: Table 1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Results for 2,488 Isolates of S. pneumoniae Collected Nationally, 2005 MIC (µg/ml)

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Bacteria Isolated from Clinical Specimens1

Performance Information. Vet use only

Michael T. Sweeney* and Gary E. Zurenko. Infectious Diseases Biology, Pharmacia Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007

IMPORTANCE OF GLOBAL HARMONIZATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING IN CANADA FOR DEFINING ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE

Defining Extended Spectrum b-lactamases: Implications of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration- Based Screening Versus Clavulanate Confirmation Testing

Effects of Minocycline and Other Antibiotics on Fusobacterium necrophorum Infections in Mice

In Vitro Susceptibility to Pexiganan of Bacteria Isolated from Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Bacteriology of Moderate-to-Severe Diabetic Foot Infections and In Vitro Activity of Antimicrobial Agents

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Advance Access published August 26, 2006

Transcription:

AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 17 February 2009 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/aac.01557-08 Copyright 2009, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved. ANTI-ANAEROBIC ACTIVITIES OF SULOPENEM COMPARED TO SIX OTHER AGENTS LOIS M. EDNIE PETER C. APPELBAUM * Departments of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033 Running title: Sulopenem anti-anaerobic activity Correspondence to: Dr. Peter C. Appelbaum Department of Pathology Hershey Medical Center P.O Box 850 Hershey, PA 17033 Telephone no.: (717) 531-5113 Telefax no.: (717) 531-7953 E-mail: pappelbaum@psu.edu

2 ABSTRACT. Agar dilution MIC methodology was used to compare the activity of sulopenem with that of amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, clindamycin and metronidazole against 431 anaerobes. Overall, MIC 50 / 90 values (µg/ml) were: sulopenem, 0.25/1.0 amoxicillin/clavulanate, 0.5/2.0; ampicillin/sulbactam, 0.5/4.0; piperacillin/tazobactam, 0.25/8.0; imipenem, 0.06/1.0; clindamycin, 0.25/16.0; metronidazole, 1.0/4.0. Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on May 12, 2018 by guest

3 Anaerobes are becoming increasingly resistant to ß-lactams due to ß-lactamase production and other mechanisms. Although ß-lactamase production, and concomitant resistance to ß-lactams, is the norm amongst the Bacteroides fragilis group, other anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli in the genus Prevotella, Porphyromonas and Fusobacterium have increasingly become ß-lactamase positive. ß-lactamase production also has been described in clostridia. Metronidazole resistance in organisms other than non-sporeforming Gram-positive bacilli has been described, as has clindamycinresistance in anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli (1-5). Although most anaerobes are susceptible to carbapenems, resistance has occurred. Quinolone resistance has developed, importantly in Clostridium difficile, necessitating development of other agents to treat pseudomembranous colitis (6,8-10,12,14,16). CP-65,207, whose in vitro activity was published in 1989 (13) is a diastereomeric mixture of two isomers, the active component of the two being sulopenem. Sulopenem development was put on hold in the 1990s as discovery/development efforts were focused on Gram-positive organisms. There is now an urgent need for drugs against Gram-negative strains and sulopenem has re-entered clinical development (M. Huband, personal communication). PF-03709270 is a novel oral prodrug of sulopenem (11). The oral prodrug approach makes this compound unique amongst the penems and carbapenems. PF-03709270 and sulopenem both entered phase II studies December 2008. Structures of sulopenem and its oral prodrug PF-03709270 are shown in Figures 1 and 2 respectively. This study examined the activity of sulopenem compared with that of

4 amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, clindamycin and metronidazole against 431 anaerobes. All anaerobes were clinical strains identified by standard procedures (16) and kept frozen in double strength skim milk (dehydrated skim milk: BD, Sparks, MD) at -70 o C until use. Prior to testing, strains were subcultured twice onto enriched Brucella agar plates (7). Sulbactam and sulopenem susceptibility powders were obtained from Pfizer Central Research, Groton, CT, and other drugs from respective manufacturers. ß-lactamase testing was by the nitrocefin disk method (Cefinase: BD, Sparks, MD). Agar dilution susceptibility testing was according to the latest method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)(7), using Brucella agar with 5% sterile laked sheep blood. Clavulanate and sulbactam were combined with amoxicillin and ampicillin, respectively, in 1:2 ratios, and tazobactam with piperacillin at a fixed concentration of 4.0 µg/ml. Breakpoint values, where CLSI approved, were as follows: amoxicillin/clavulanate, 4.0 µg/ml; ampicillin/sulbactam, 8.0 µg/ml; piperacillin/tazobactam, 32.0 µg/ml; imipenem, 4.0 µg/ml; clindamycin, 2.0 µg/ml; metronidazole, 8.0 µg/ml. Quality control strains recommended by CLSI (Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741, and Eggerthella lenta ATCC 43055) were included with each run. Sulopenem MIC ranges for these strains (µg/ml) were 0.06-0.125, 0.25, and 1.0, respectively. Amongst the anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli tested, 95/101 (94%) of B. fragilis group, 57/100 (57%) of Prevotella/Porphyromonas and 3/60 (5%) of fusobacteria produced ß-lactamase. Results of MIC testing are presented in Table 1. Overall, MIC 50 / 90 values (µg/ml) were: sulopenem, 0.25/1.0; amoxicillin/clavulanate, 0.5/2.0;

5 ampicillin/sulbactam, 0.5/4.0; piperacillin/tazobactam, 0.25/8.0; imipenem, 0.06/1.0; clindamycin, 0.25/16.0; metronidazole, 1.0/4.0. With the exception of 6 strains of lactobacilli, sulopenem and imipenem both had MICs <4.0 µg/ml against all strains tested in this study. Clindamycin resistance was found in all of the Bacteroides species tested as well as 5 of the 15 different species of the Prevotella and Porphyromonas tested. Eighteen of the 21 strains of Fusbacterium varium showed resistance to clindamycin while all other fusobacteria were clindamycin susceptible. For all anaerobic Gram-positive cocci tested, clindamycin resistance was observed in only one strain of Finegoldia magna and one Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus. All groups of anaerobic non-spore-forming Gram-positive rods except Propionibacterium acnes had some degree of clindamycin resistance. All Clostridium tertium strains as well as some strains in 5 of the 11 other Clostridium species were clindamycin resistant. Most Gram-positive non-sporeforming rods (with the exception of Eggerthella) were metronidazole-resistant while all anaerobic Gram-negative rods, Gram-positive cocci, and clostridia were metronidazole susceptible. Pipercillin/tazobactam was active against all strains tested with MICs of 16 µg/ml. Resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanate was found in 4 of 7 species of Bacteroides as well as 2 strains of Fusobacterium mortiferum. All other strains of fusobacteria as well as all strains of Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Clostridium, and Gram-positive non-sporeforming rods were amoxicillin/clavulanate susceptible. Two of the 10 Peptostreptococcus anaerobius strains showed amoxicillin/clavulanate resistance, while all other Gram-positive cocci were susceptible. Ampicillin/sulbactam was active against all strains of Clostridium, anaerobic Gram-positive nonsporeforming rods, Prevotella and Porphyromonas tested. Gram-negative rods showing

6 ampicillin/sulbactam resistance included some strains in 3 of the 7 Bacteroides species tested and 2 strains of Fusobacterium mortiferum, while other species of fusobacteria were susceptible. While 413 of 431 strains (95.8%) tested had sulopenem MICs 2 µg/ml, 18 strains (4.2%) had MICs of 4.0 µg/ml. These included 7 Lactobacillus species (6 strains >8.0 µg/ml, 1 strain 4.0 µg/ml), 10 strains of Clostridium (4 C. difficile, 1 C. innocuum, and 5 unspeciated)(mics all 4.0 µg/ml), and 1 Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (MIC 4.0 µg/ml). Until pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints for sulopenem can be established, the clinical significance of these relatively higher sulopenem MICs cannot be established. Gootz and co-workers (13) in their 1989 study on CP-65,207, reported on its activity against 84 anaearobes, many of which have since been reclassified. Excluding Peptococcus spp which are no longer included amongst clinically significant anaerobic Gram-positive cocci in standard manuals (16), results were similar to those obtained in our study. In a study of the comparative activity of sulopenem against a collection of recently isolated Gram-positive and -negative aerobic organisms, sulopenem MIC 90 s ranged between 0.03-1 µg/ml against all clinically significant bacterial species tested. This high in vitro potency was also confirmed by in vitro time-kill studies (15). Our study adds anaerobes to the activity spectrum for this drug and suggests a potential place for sulopenem in treatment of mixed anaerobic infections. Pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic and experimental animal studies are necessary to further delineate the clinical role of these compounds in treatment of anaerobic infections This study was supported by a grant from Pfizer Central Research, Groton, CT. and was presented at the 48 th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and

7 Chemotherapy (abstract. F1-347).

8 Figure 1. Chemical structure of sulopenem OH S S N S + O - O OH O Sulopenem (CP-070429) Figure 2. Chemical structure of PF-03709270, oral prodrug of sulopenem OH S O S S N O O O O O

9 REFERENCES 1. Appelbaum, P.C., A. Philippon, M.R. Jacobs, S.K. Spangler, and L. Gutmann. 1990. Characterization of ß-lactamases from non-bacteroides fragilis group Bacteroides spp. belonging to seven species and their role in ß-lactam resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34: 2169-2176. 2. Appelbaum, P.C., S.K. Spangler, and M.R. Jacobs. 1990. Evaluation of two methods for rapid testing for beta-lactamase production in Bacteroides and Fusobacterium. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9: 47-50. 3. Appelbaum, P.C., S.K. Spangler, and M.R. Jacobs. 1990. ß-Lactamase production and susceptibilities to amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin, ticarcillinclavulanate, cefoxitin, imipenem, and metronidazole of 320 non-bacteroides fragilis Bacteroides and 129 fusobacteria from 28 U.S. centers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34: 1546-1550. 4. Appelbaum, P.C., S.K. Spangler, and M.R. Jacobs. 1993. Susceptibility of 539 gram-positive and -negative anaerobes to new agents, including RP 59500, biapenem, trospectomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 32: 223-231. 5. Appelbaum, P.C., S.K. Spangler, G.A. Pankuch, A. Philippon, M.R. Jacobs, R. Shiman, E.J.C. Goldstein, and D. Citron. 1994. Characterization of a ß-lactamase from Clostridium clostridioforme. J. Antimicrob. Chemother 33: 33-40. 6. Bauernfeind, A. 1997. Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the quinolones Bay 12-8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and

10 ciprofloxacin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40: 639-651. 7. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. 2007. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria; approved standard 7 th ed. M11-A7. CLSI, Wayne, PA. Wayne, PA. 8. Credito, K.L., and P.C. Appelbaum. 2004. Activity of OPT-80, a novel macrocycle, compared with those of eight other agents against selected anaerobic species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 4430-4434. 9. Credito, K.L., L.M. Ednie, and P.C. Appelbaum. 2008. Comparative antianaerobic activities of doripenem determined by MIC and time-kill analysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 365-373. 10. Ednie, L.M., M.R. Jacobs, and P.C. Appelbaum. 1998. Activities of gatifloxacin compared to those of seven other agents against anaerobic organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42: 2459-2462. 11. Forrest, A., A. Hazra, D. Girard, S. Finegan, J. O Donnell, and K. Soma. 2008. Use of PK/PD analysis to select doses for PF-03709270 with and without probenecid (P), to be studied in phase 2b trials Abstr. 48 th Intersci. Conf. on Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. (A-034). 12. Goldstein, E.J.C., and D.M. Citron. 1992. Comparative activity of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, temafloxacin, CI-960, CI-990, and Win 57273 against anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36: 1158-1162. 13. Gootz, T., J. Retsema, A. Girard, E. Hamanaka, M. Anderson, and S. Sokolowski. 1989. In vitro activity of CP-65,207, a new penem antimicrobial agent, in comparison with those of other agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33: 1160-

11 1166 14. Hoellman, D.B., L.M. Kelly, M.R. Jacobs, and P.C. Appelbaum. 2001. Comparative antianaerobic activity of BMS 284756. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 589-592. 15. Huband, M.D., Gootz, T.D., M.A. Cohen, L.M. Mullins, S.P. McCurdy, L.A. Brennan, J.M. Duignan, P.J. Pagano, and R.W. Murray. 2008. In vitro antibacterial activity of sulopenem: a new oral penem antimicrobial versus recent bacterial isolates. Abstr. 48 th Intersci. Conf. on Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. (F1-344). 16. Jousimies-Somer, H.R., P. Summanen, D.M. Citron, E.J. Baron, H. Wexler, and S.M. Finegold SM. 2002. Wadsworth-KTL anaerobic bacteriology manual. Star Publishing Co., Belmont, California. Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on May 12, 2018 by guest

9 TABLE 1. MICs (µg/ml) of agents Organism Drug MIC range MIC 50 MIC 90 Bacteroides fragilis (49/49) a Sulopenem 0.03-2.0 0.125 0.5 Imipenem 0.06-1.0 0.125 0.25 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.25-4.0 0.5 2.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.5-8.0 1.0 8.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-4.0 0.5 2.0 Clindamycin 0.03->32.0 1.0 >32.0 Metronidazole 0.25-2.0 1.0 1.0 Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (10/10) Sulopenem 0.25-0.5 0.25 0.5 Imipenem 0.25 0.25 0.25 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5-8.0 1.0 4.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 1.0-8.0 2.0 8.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.0-16.0 8.0 16.0 Clindamycin 1.0->32.0 4.0 >32.0 Metronidazole 1.0-2.0 1.0 2.0 Bacteroides ovatus (10/10) Sulopenem 0.25-1.0 0.25 0.5 Imipenem 0.125-0.5 0.125 0.25 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5-2.0 0.5 2.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 1.0-8.0 1.0 4.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 1.0-4.0 2.0 4.0 Clindamycin 1.0->32.0 2.0 >32.0 Metronidazole 0.25-1.0 1.0 1.0 Bacteroides vulgatus (10/10) Sulopenem 0.25-1.0 0.5 1.0 Imipenem 0.25-1.0 0.5 0.5 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5-8.0 1.0 8.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 1.0-16.0 2.0 16.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 1.0-16.0 2.0 16.0 Clindamycin 0.016->32.0 0.03 1.0 Metronidazole 0.125-1.0 0.5 1.0 Bacteroides distasonis (5/11) Sulopenem 0.25-1.0 0.5 1.0 Imipenem 0.25-1.0 0.5 1.0 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 2.0-32.0 4.0 16.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 4.0-32.0 8.0 32.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 2.0-16.0 4.0 4.0 Clindamycin 0.03->32.0 4.0 16.0 Metronidazole 0.5-1.0 1.0 1.0 Bacteroides uniformis (6/6) Sulopenem 0.25-1.0 0.25 - Imipenem 0.25-0.5 0.25 - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5-16.0 0.5 - Ampicillin/sulbactam 1.0-32.0 1.0 - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.5-8.0 1.0 - Clindamycin 1.0->32.0 2.0 - Metronidazole 0.5-1.0 0.5 -

10 Bacteroides stercoris (5/5) Sulopenem 0.25-0.5 0.25 - Imipenem 0.25-0.5 0.25 - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5-2.0 1.0 - Ampicillin/sulbactam 1.0-4.0 2.0 - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-4.0 1.0 - Clindamycin 4->32.0 8 - Metronidazole 1.0-2.0 1.0 - Prevotella bivia (12/16) Sulopenem 0.06-0.5 0.125 0.25 Imipenem 0.03-0.25 0.03 0.25 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-4.0 0.5 4.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-8.0 1.0 4.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-4.0 0.125 0.125 Clindamycin 0.016->32.0 0.016 >32.0 Metronidazole 1.0-4.0 2.0 4.0 Prevotella buccae (8/16) Sulopenem 0.06-0.25 0.125 0.25 Imipenem 0.03-0.125 0.03 0.125 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-2.0 0.125 1.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-2.0 0.25 2.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125 0.125 0.125 Clindamycin 0.016 0.016 0.016 Metronidazole 0.5-2.0 1.0 2.0 Prevotella melaninogenica/denticola (12/17) Sulopenem 0.03-0.25 0.125 0.25 Imipenem 0.016-0.125 0.03 0.125 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-2.0 0.25 2.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-4.0 0.5 2.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125 0.125 0.125 Clindamycin 0.016-0.125 0.016 0.06 Metronidazole 0.125-1.0 0.5 1.0 Prevotella intermedia/nigrescens (8/13) Sulopenem 0.03-0.125 0.06 0.125 Imipenem 0.016-0.06 0.016 0.06 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.5 0.125 0.5 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-1.0 0.25 0.5 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125 0.125 0.125 Clindamycin 0.016-8.0 0.016 0.016 Metronidazole 0.125-1.0 0.5 1.0 Prevotella corporis (4/9) Sulopenem 0.03-0.125 0.06 - Imipenem 0.016-0.06 0.016 - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.5 0.125 - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-2.0 0.125 - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125 0.125 - Clindamycin 0.016->32.0 0.016 - Metronidazole 0.125-1.0 0.5 -

11 Prevotella disiens (6/7) Sulopenem 0.03-0.25 0.125 - Imipenem 0.03-0.125 0.06 - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-2.0 0.25 - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-2.0 0.25 - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125 0.125 - Clindamycin 0.016-0.03 0.016 - Metronidazole 1-2 1 - Prevotella baroniae (0/3) Sulopenem 0.06 - - Imipenem 0.03 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125 - - Clindamycin 0.016->32.0 - - Metronidazole 0.5-1.0 - - Prevotella oralis group (1/3) Sulopenem 0.016-0.125 - - Imipenem 0.016-0.06 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.5 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-1.0 - - Clindamycin 0.016 - - Metronidazole 0.125-1.0 - - Prevotella veroralis (2/3) Sulopenem 0.06-0.125 - - Imipenem 0.03 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.25 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-1.0 - - Clindamycin 0.016-0.03 - - Metronidazole 0.25-0.5 - - Prevotella bergensis (2/2) Sulopenem 0.125 - - Imipenem 0.06 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 1.0 - - Clindamycin 0.016-0.25 - - Metronidazole 0.5 - - Prevotella salivae (1/2) Sulopenem 0.06-0.125 - - Imipenem 0.03-0.06 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.5 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-1.0 - - Clindamycin 0.016 - - Metronidazole 0.125-0.5 - - Prevotella loeschii (1/1) Sulopenem 0.125 - - Imipenem 0.03 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.25 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.5 - - Clindamycin 0.016 - -

12 Metronidazole 0.5 - - Prevotella sp (0/1) Sulopenem 0.03 - - Imipenem 0.03 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125 - - Clindamycin 0.016 - - Metronidazole 0.5 - - Porphyromonas asaccharolytica (0/4) Sulopenem 0.016-0.03 - - Imipenem 0.016 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125 - - Clindamycin 0.016->32.0 - - Metronidazole 0.125-4.0 - - Porphyromonas gingivalis (0/3) Sulopenem 0.03-0.06 - - Imipenem 0.016 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125 - - Clindamycin 0.016 - - Metronidazole 0.125 - - Fusobacterium nucleatum (1/20) Sulopenem 0.016-0.06 0.016 0.03 Imipenem 0.016-0.06 0.03 0.06 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-1.0 0.125 0.125 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-8.0 0.125 0.125 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125 0.125 0.125 Clindamycin 0.016-0.125 0.06 0.125 Metronidazole 0.125-0.5 0.125 0.5 Fusobacterium necrophorum (0/5) Sulopenem 0.016 0.016 - Imipenem 0.016 0.016 - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125 0.125 - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125 0.125 - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125 0.125 - Clindamycin 0.016-0.06 0.03 - Metronidazole 0.125-0.25 0.25 - Fusobacterium mortiferum (2/14) Sulopenem 0.125-1.0 0.5 0.5 Imipenem 0.25-1.0 0.5 1.0 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5-32.0 1.0 32.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.5->32.0 1.0 >32.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.25-8.0 0.25 1.0 Clindamycin 0.03-0.25 0.06 0.125 Metronidazole 0.125-1.0 0.25 0.5 Fusobacterium varium (0/21) Sulopenem 0.125-0.5 0.5 0.5 Imipenem 0.5-1.0 0.5 1.0 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 1.0-2.0 2.0 2.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.5-2.0 2.0 2.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 1.0-8.0 4.0 8.0 Clindamycin 1.0-32.0 8.0 32.0

13 Metronidazole 0.125-1.0 0.25 0.5 Finegoldia magna (0/10) Sulopenem 0.125-0.5 0.25 0.25 Imipenem 0.06-0.125 0.06 0.125 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.5 0.25 0.25 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-0.5 0.25 0.5 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-0.25 0.125 0.25 Clindamycin 0.06->32.0 0.125 2.0 Metronidazole 0.25-1.0 0.5 1.0 Micromonas micros (0/10) Sulopenem 0.125-0.25 0.125 0.125 Imipenem 0.03-0.125 0.03 0.06 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-2.0 0.125 0.5 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-1.0 <0.125 1.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-0.25 0.125 0.125 Clindamycin 0.125-0.5 0.125 0.25 Metronidazole 0.125-0.5 0.25 0.5 Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (0/10) Sulopenem 0.25-4.0 0.5 2.0 Imipenem 0.06-2.0 0.06 1.0 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-32.0 0.25 32.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-16.0 0.25 16.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.25-16 0.25 16.0 Clindamycin 0.016-0.25 0.016 0.25 Metronidazole 0.125-1.0 0.5 1.0 Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus (0/7) Sulopenem 0.03-0.06 0.06 - Imipenem 0.016-0.03 0.016 - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125 0.125 - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125 0.125 - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125 0.125 - Clindamycin 0.06->32.0 0.125 - Metronidazole 0.125-2.0 1.0 - Anaerococcus tetradius (0/10) Sulopenem 0.06-1.0 0.125 0.25 Imipenem 0.016-0.5 0.03 0.06 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-1.0 0.125 0.125 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-1.0 0.125 0.125 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-2.0 0.125 0.25 Clindamycin 0.25-1.0 0.5 1.0 Metronidazole 0.5-2.0 1.0 1.0 Anaerococcus prevotii (0/3) Sulopenem 0.03-0.125 - - Imipenem 0.016-0.03 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.25 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-0.25 - - Clindamycin 0.125-0.25 - - Metronidazole 1.0-2.0 - -

14 Lactobacillus sp (0/10) Sulopenem 0.5->8.0 >8.0 >8.0 Imipenem 0.125-4.0 1.0 2.0 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5-1.0 1.0 1.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.5-1.0 1.0 1.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 1.0-2.0 2.0 2.0 Clindamycin 0.25-4.0 0.5 4.0 Metronidazole >16.0 >16.0 >16.0 Bifidobacterium sp (0/10) Sulopenem 0.06-1.0 0.25 1.0 Imipenem 0.03-0.25 0.03 0.125 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.5 0.125 0.25 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-0.5 0.125 0.25 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-0.5 0.125 0.25 Clindamycin 0.016->32.0 0.03 >32.0 Metronidazole 4->16.0 >16.0 >16.0 Propionibacterium acnes (0/18) Sulopenem 0.125-0.25 0.125 0.25 Imipenem 0.016-0.03 0.03 0.03 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.25 0.125 0.25 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-0.25 0.125 0.25 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-1.0 0.25 1.0 Clindamycin 0.06 0.06 0.06 Metronidazole >16.0 >16.0 >16.0 Actinomyces sp (0/5) Sulopenem 0.25-0.5 0.5 - Imipenem 0.06-0.25 0.125 - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.5 0.25 - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-0.5 0.25 - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.5-2.0 1.0 - Clindamycin 0.03-4.0 0.125 - Metronidazole 1.0->16.0 >16.0 - Eggerthella lenta (0/17) Sulopenem 1.0 1.0 1.0 Imipenem 0.25-0.5 0.5 0.5 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5-1.0 1.0 1.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.5-2.0 1.0 2.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 8.0-16.0 16.0 16.0 Clindamycin 0.06->32.0 0.25 1.0 Metronidazole 0.25-0.5 0.5 0.5 Clostridium perfringens (0/19) Sulopenem 0.03-0.5 0.125 0.25 Imipenem 0.06-0.125 0.125 0.125 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125 0.125 0.125 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-0.25 0.125 0.25 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-0.5 0.125 0.5 Clindamycin 0.06->32.0 0.5 2.0 Metronidazole 0.5-2.0 1.0 1.0

15 Clostridium difficile (0/10) Sulopenem 2.0-4.0 2.0 4.0 Imipenem 2.0-4.0 4.0 4.0 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5-2.0 1.0 2.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 1.0-4.0 2.0 2.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 8.0-16.0 8.0 16.0 Clindamycin 2.0->32.0 4.0 >32.0 Metronidazole 0.25-0.5 0.5 0.5 Clostridium sp (0/10) Sulopenem 0.06-4.0 2.0 4.0 Imipenem 0.06-4.0 1.0 1.0 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-1.0 0.5 0.5 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-0.5 0.25 0.5 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-2.0 1.0 2.0 Clindamycin 1.0->32.0 1.0 16.0 Metronidazole 0.25-1.0 1.0 1.0 Clostridium tertium (0/5) Sulopenem 1.0 1.0 - Imipenem 0.25 0.25 - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.5-1.0 0.5 - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.25-1.0 0.25 - Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.0-8.0 8.0 - Clindamycin 8.0-16.0 8.0 - Metronidazole 0.5-1.0 1.0 - Clostridium ramosum (0/4) Sulopenem 0.5 - - Imipenem 0.25-0.5 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125 - - Clindamycin 2.0-4.0 - - Metronidazole 1.0 - - Clostridium cadaveris (0/3) Sulopenem 0.25 - - Imipenem 0.125 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-0.25 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125 - - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-0.25 - - Clindamycin 0.06 - - Metronidazole 0.125 - - Clostridium bifermentans (0/2) Sulopenem 0.5 - - Imipenem 0.25-0.5 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.25 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.5 - - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.5 - - Clindamycin 0.125-0.25 - - Metronidazole 0.25-0.5 - - Clostridium innocuum (0/2) Sulopenem 0.25-4.0 - - Imipenem 0.125-2.0 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-1.0 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125-0.25 - - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-2.0 - - Clindamycin 0.03-1.0 - -

16 Metronidazole 0.125-0.5 - - Clostridium sordellii (0/2) Sulopenem 0.125-0.5 - - Imipenem 0.06-0.125 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125 - - Clindamycin 0.25-1.0 - - Metronidazole 1.0 - - Clostridium butyricum (0/1) Sulopenem 0.5 - - Imipenem 0.5 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 1.0 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 1.0 - - Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.5 - - Clindamycin 2.0 - - Metronidazole 0.125 - - Clostridium clostridioforme (0/1) Sulopenem 1.0 - - Imipenem 1.0 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 1.0 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 1.0 - - Piperacillin/tazobactam 8.0 - - Clindamycin 0.03 - - Metronidazole 0.125 - - Clostridium hastiforme (0/1) Sulopenem 2.0 - - Imipenem 2.0 - - Amoxicillin/clavulanate 1.0 - - Ampicillin/sulbactam 1.0 - - Piperacillin/tazobactam 2.0 - - Clindamycin 0.06 - - Metronidazole 0.25 - - All strains (155/431) Sulopenem 0.016->8.0 0.25 1.0 Imipenem 0.016-4.0 0.06 1.0 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 0.125-32.0 0.5 2.0 Ampicillin/sulbactam 0.125->32.0 0.5 4.0 Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.125-16.0 0.25 8.0 Clindamycin 0.016->32.0 0.25 16.0 Metronidazole 0.125->16.0 1.0 4.0 a No. ß-lactamase-positive/no. strains tested.