FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT GUIDE

Similar documents
SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDELINES 2014

What is BQA s purpose? To ensure all consumers that all cattle are raised in a responsible manner ensuring safe, wholesome and healthy beef.

Practical Euthanasia of Cattle. Considerations for the Producer, Livestock Market Operator, Livestock Transporter, and Veterinarian

Guidance for Euthanasia of Non-ambulatory Livestock at Meat Plants By Erika L. Voogd, Voogd Consulting, Inc.

BQSAP. Section 1. d. None of the above

NEWBORN CARE AND HANDLING STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (SOP) TEMPLATE AND GUIDELINES

Herd Health Plan. Contact Information. Date Created: Date(s) Reviewed/Updated: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Farm Manager: Veterinarian of Record:

The kindest act. Euthanasia

Animal Liberation Queensland Submission on Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines Section A: Cattle 04/05/13

Arkansas Beef Quality Assurance Program Producer Certification Exam

1. HOUSING AND HANDLING FACILITIES Pig Code Requirements 1.1 Housing Systems

Beef Cattle Husbandry and Breeding

BQA RECERTIFICATION TRAINING Administered by Pennsylvania Beef Quality Assurance

Societal Concerns. Animal Welfare & Beef Industry Practices: My Goal for Today is. Reality of Societal Concerns. Dehorning, Castration, & Branding

Cat Alliance of Australia Inc

Evaluate Environment (page 7-8)

Payback News. Beef Herd Nutrition Challenges

Animal Care Quick Reference User Guide

Handling, Stunning, and Determining Insensibility in Cattle. Temple Grandin Department of Animal Science Colorado State University

Humane Handling GMPs. A Regulatory Perspective. Craig Shultz, DVM Food Safety and Inspection Service Cargill-Taylor Beef Wyalusing, PA

IVSAH Guidelines for Humane Kosher Slaughter

proaction in Ontario Created by Drs. Steven Roche & Kelly Barratt

What is Dairy Production Medicine?

Global Animal Partnership s. About the Animal Welfare Rating Pilot Standards for Meat Sheep and Meat Goat Collection Points v1.0

General Prevention Practices for Beef and dairy Producers

Animal Care Best Management Practices

Animal Welfare Certification & Auditing

Euthanasia of veal cattle and dairy calves

Manual & Workbook MARCH 2018

Reference Manual & Workbook JULY 2018

Chicken Farmers of Canada animal Care Program. Implementation guide

Guide for Veterinarians And Their Staff

Johne s Disease Control

OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION

Jim Reynolds DVM, MPVM

DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Agricultural Species

Beef Cattle Herd Health Workshop # 10

Lameness Information and Evaluation Factsheet

Quality Assurance & Food Safety for Arizona Youth Livestock Producers Youth Re-certification Checklist Summary

Chapter 2 - Handling Animals Cattle

ADDENDUM 4 GOOD MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND SOP S FOR CATTLE FARMERS.

Poultry Quality Assurance. Youth Poultry Clinic Lucinda B. Miller, Ph.D., Extension Specialist, 4-H March 24, 2018

American Association of Feline Practitioners American Animal Hospital Association

Safe Food Production Queensland: Animal Welfare SOPs: Version 1.1 October

Youth Pork Quality Assurance Plus

A Meat Goat Quality Assurance Program. Roger Merkel. E (Kika) de la Garza American Institute for Goat Research Langston University Langston, OK 73050

Global Animal Partnership 5-Step Animal Welfare Rating Standards for Beef Cattle (Steps 1-4)

Euthanasia and Worker Safety

Animal Care Resource Guide Veterinary Care Issue Date: August 18, 2006

Humane Choice True Free Range Standards Sheep 2011 Version 1.1

lasting compassion and

Web Site / Site Internet :

Euthanasia Guidelines

FARM ASSURANCE FOR SHEEP ONLY

ASEAN GOOD ANIMAL HUSBANDRY PRACTICES FOR PIGS

The following proposed language and general comments are consistent with the OIE mandate to take the lead internationally on animal welfare.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above Standards and Guidelines and its accompanying Regulation Impact Statement (RIS).

Toward a Common Swine Industry Audit

Animal Care Resource Guide Veterinary Care Issue Date: July 17, 2007

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Title: Euthanasia Procedures for the UC Davis Animal Care Program

Helping Arizona Produce Safe, Wholesome, Healthy Beef

5-Step Animal Welfare Rating Program Audit Prep Tool Meat Sheep

FRENZ. World Leading Poultry Layer Standard

Information document accompanying the EFSA Questionnaire on the main welfare problems for sheep for wool, meat and milk production

NYSCHAP BASELINE SURVEY Cover Page

The Heifer Facility Puzzle: The New Puzzle Pieces

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 1983

ANIMAL CARE PROGRAM DAIRY POOL STANDARDS. Approved by CROPP Cooperative board of directors, August 31, 2017 Effective January 1, 2018

Pain Management on Beef Farms: Practically Painless

Changes in Antibiotic Labeling Veterinary Feed Directive. Changes in Antibiotic Regulations. Concerns with Antibiotic Use 2/29/2016

IACUC POLICIES, PROCEDURES, and GUIDELINES. HUMANE USE PAIN CLASSIFICATIONS (Pain Categories)

Know how. Know now. Assuring Quality. A guide for youth livestock producers

On-Farm Euthanasia of Swine. Options for the Producer

Policies of UK Supermarkets: Liquid milk

Page: 1 of 6. (Signature/Date)

Beef Producers. The Judicious Use of Antimicrobials for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

What this guide covers

Livestock: Transport and Markets Student Activities

Livestock Transport Requirements in Canada

United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Inspection Report. Customer ID:

Beef Quality Assurance Fact Sheet Animal Sciences/Forages

ruma Cattle Responsible use of antimicrobials in Cattle production GUIDELINES

Principles & Guidelines for Dairy Animal Well-Being

Assuring Quality Care for Animals

The Animal Welfare offi cer in the European Union

SECTION IV-1 PARLOURS

NYS Cattle Health Assurance Program. Expansion Module Background and Best Management Practices

What the Research Shows about the Use of Rubber Floors for Cows

Animal Health and Welfare Best Practices. Claresholm Veterinary Services Ltd Dr. Ken Wright, DVM, BSc

Assuring Quality Care for Animals 2015

(c) Ensure that necessary and standard veterinary care is provided in a timely manner

Review of the Exporter Supply Chain Assurance System

KALAHARI BEEF FREE RANGE BEEF SPECIFICATIONS SECTION A: LIVE ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Cattle Foot Care And Lameness control

DAIRY ANIMAL HANDLING STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (SOP) TEMPLATE AND GUIDELINES

FEEDING EWES BETTER FOR INCREASED PRODUCTION AND PROFIT. Dr. Dan Morrical Department of Animal Science Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

Animal Health and Welfare. Best Practice

Transcription:

FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT GUIDE For more information, visit www.bqa.org A SAFE, WHOLESOME AND HEALTHY BEEF SUPPLY

Assessor s Guide to a Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) Feedyard Assessment The BQA Feedyard Assessment The BQA Feedyard Assessment is an on-site educational tool that allows for assessing and benchmarking key indicators of animal care and well-being as well as feedyard conditions. The Feedyard Assessment focuses on three main areas Animals, Records, Protocols and Facilities and Equipment. The Feedyard Assessment may be utilized as a self-assessment, completed by a second-party (i.e. consulting veterinarian, nutritionist, feedyard staff, extension personnel, BQA coordinator, etc.) or conducted by a third-party assessor. The real key, regardless of who conducts the assessment, is that the assessment be repeated on a periodic basis so that comparisons may be made, trends observed, and management actions be taken to maximize animal care and well-being and feedyard efficiency. The Feedyard Assessment consists of multiple assessment points grouped into nine main categories. This assessment is about continous improvement. However, it can help identify items and create benchmark points that may need to be improved including animal handling, facility/equipment maintenance, and recordkeeping/bmps among other items. Repeating the assessment on a regular basis can help a feedyard identify trends and take appropriate management action as necessary. Assessor s Guide This Assessor s Guide is written to help the individual(s) conducting a feedyard assessment complete the assessment and associated assessment form(s) accurately and efficiently. The complete assessment form is included in this guide; however due to individual operational needs there are multiple variations of the assessment form available. The form(s) used depends upon the individual assessor and the operation being assessed. All forms have a common framework, they list the following: Major category (ex: BMPs/Records) Category Point, a specific component of a major category, (ex: Training) Measure, how the category point is evaluated (ex: Is there a protocol in place?) Result, (4 choices, select one) Acceptable/Yes This point/measure was satisfied appropriately Requires action This point/measure was somewhat satisfied but could use improvement, requires the comment field to be filled out Unacceptable/No This point/measure was not met satisfactorily, requires the comment field to be filled out Not Applicable This point does not apply in this operation/situation, comment section may be completed to explain why Comments, area for comments on that category point including commentary on why a measure was recorded as it was and advice for improving that point in the future (Optional for Acceptable result) The content of this guide includes all assessment categories and points as well as a short explanation of how to complete the measure for category points. If the version of the assessment form the assessor is using is not the complete version, simply skip over the areas in the guide that do not apply to the situation. Scheduling If a third-party assessment is to be conducted, adequate notice should be provided so that biosecurity protocols are known and can be observed by an off-site assessor. Additionally, advance notice will provide time for copies of any required records that may be stored off-site to be made available at the feedyard site. BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT 1

When should operations be assessed? An assessment should only be conducted when the site is operating under normal conditions. For example, do not perform an assessment during a period of disease-outbreak or when another serious factor or factors may be impacting the operation creating abnormal conditions whereas the feedyard is not exhibiting normal operational conditions (ex: extreme weather conditions, natural disaster, etc.). Additionally, an assessment should not be conducted if doing so would force animals to be handled or moved during conditions which may be detrimental to animal well-being. Minimally, an assessment should be conducted every three years. Some operations may decide to conduct an assessment more frequently. Assessment Forms The assessment forms have been designed in an assessment-flow pattern to help the assessor eliminate backtracking and/or moving inside/outside/inside, etc. However, these forms cannot account for all situations and the assessment-order is only a suggested order, the assessment may be completed in any order as deemed appropriate by the assessor. Choosing Pens/Animals to Assess Efforts should be made to randomly select pens, water troughs, feed bunks and cattle for the assessment. This could include use of the feedyard s yard sheet or drawing numbers from a hat or box to identify pens that will be subject to the assessment prior to driving/walking around the feedyard. The yard sheet will also help ensure that pens being assessed are currently occupied with cattle. A minimum of ten pens should be assessed. If a feedyard has less than tens pens with cattle in them, all pens with cattle present should be assessed. Additionally, the assessor should make an effort to assess pens, water troughs, feed bunks and cattle in areas such as the receiving/shipping pens and hospital(s). The number of those areas assessed will be feedyard-specific and dependent upon the size of the feedyard and types of facilities available. Recordkeeping and Documentation The Feedyard Assessment guide contains references to many types of records including documentation of protocols. You may call protocols, Best Managment Practices (BMPs) or standard operating procedures (SOPs). A set of customizable, fill-in-the-blank, sample/template forms is provided as part of this guide. If you do not already have one or more of the documents referenced as part of the Feedyard Assessment, you are encouraged to use these provided forms as-is or make modifications to fit your operation. 2 BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT

BQA Feedyard Assessment Operation Name: Date: Assessors Name/Phone: Location: Operation contact Name/Phone: Category Point Measure Acceptable/Yes Requires Action Unacceptable/No Not Applicable Willful abuse of animals will not be tolerated. Willful abuse is defined as acts outside of accepted BQA production practices that intentionally cause pain, injury or suffering including, but not limited to: Intentionally applying any type of driving aid to a sensitive part of the animal including, but not limited to: eye, ear, nose, rectum or genitalia Malicious hitting or beating of an animal Movement of non-ambulatory cattle in a manner inconsistent with BQA recommendations If no abuse was witnessed, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, make an appropriate mark and fill out the comments section. If abuse is observed, assessor should report the abuse to Feedyard Management immediately. Abuse/Neglect Animal Abuse No animal abuse was observed during assessment. Comments: Animal neglect will not be tolerated. Animal neglect is defined as purposely not providing adequate amounts of feed, water or other necessary care, which results in significant harm to or death of an animal. If an adequate amount of feed, water and other necessary care was provided mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, make an appropriate mark and fill out the comments section. If neglect is observed, assessor should report the neglect to Feedyard Management immediately. Animal Neglect Feed, water and other necessary care was available during assessment. Comments: Requires Action or Unacceptable items require a description to be placed in the Comments field (Comments are optional for Acceptable markings.) 3

Withdrawal/Residue Avoidance Category Point Measure Acceptable/Yes Requires Action Unacceptable/ Not Applicable Management techniques must be in place, and currently utilized, to prevent treated cattle that have been treated from being marketed until the withdrawal time has been completed and there is no risk of an animal being marketed with a violative residue level. If management techniques to avoid violative residue are in place and are being utilized, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, make an appropriate mark and fill out the comments section. Residue Avoidance Comments: Protocols, BMPs, procedures or SOPs must be provided and documented for the following category points, and, when specifics are described, that protocol must contain each of the item(s) noted within the measure. Protocols (BMPs/SOPs/Records) If the measure is fully met, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, make an appropriate mark and fill out the comments section. Employee training is accomplished by utilizing one of the following: online BQA training platform (bqa.org), face-toface meetings, on-site training at the feedyard, or other means of training that meet the BQA training requirements as determined by the national BQA standards and state BQA program. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Training Manager/key employee - BQA training/re-training a minimum of every three years is documented. Demonstrate that employees and contractors receive BQA training in their respective area(s) of work, prior to conducting job duties in an unsupervised capacity. BQA certification is encouraged for all employees and contractors. Pen Surface Maintenance Euthanasia Nonambulatory Cattle Comments: Is a documented protocol in place for pen surface maintenance? Is a documented euthanasia protocol in place that meets American Association of Bovine Practicioners (AABP) guidelines? Is a documented protocol in place for dealing with nonambulatory cattle? Requires Action or Unacceptable items require a description to be placed in the Comments field (Comments are optional for Acceptable markings.) 4

Category Point Measure Acceptable/Yes Protocols (BMPs/SOPs/Records) Requires Action Unacceptable/No Not Applicable BMPs [Protocols or Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)] must be provided and documented for the following category points, and when specifics are described, that protocol must contain each of the item(s) noted within the measure. If the measure is fully met, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, make an appropriate mark and fill out the comments section. Are documented herd health protocols in place that address Herd Health disease prevention, management, and treatment? Antibiotic Stewardship Biosecurity Carcass Disposal Medication Receiving, Storage, Handling Broken Needles Medicated Feed Feed Quality Receiving/ Processing Shipping Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Supplements Veterinary/ Client/ Patient Relationship (VCPR) Comments: Have treatment protocols for diseases, lameness, digestive disorders and other cattle health and well-being issues been developed with the feedyard veterinarian, in accordance with current FDA guidance and BQA guidelines for the judicious use of antibiotics? Is a documented biosecurity protocol in place that addresses visitor logs, staff training, physical security and a current biosecurity plan? Is a documented carcass disposal protocol in place that meets federal, state and local disposal regulations? Are documented protocols available for receiving, handling and storing pharmaceuticals including inventory records, expiration dates, and disposal? Is a documented broken needle protocol in place? Is a documented protocol in place for medicated feed and are feed delivery records available? Is a documented protocol in place for feed quality which includes consultation with a nutritionist, and, the need to collect, store and analyze feed samples, especially related to potential quality issues such as aflatoxin and/or pesticide residue? Is a documented protocol available for receiving/processing cattle including processing crew responsibilities, number of cattle received, proper use of implants, processing map and animal/group ID? Is a documented protocol available for shipping cattle including withdrawal verification and safe-to-ship documents? Is an Emergency Action Plan in place (completed and available)? Is there documentation that no ruminant-derived proteins were received or fed? Is there documentation of a valid VCPR? Documentation may include items such as visit reports, billing records, or other proof documents. *In the BQA Feedyard Assessment, all references to feedyard veterinarian are within the context of a valid VCPR. Requires Action or Unacceptable items require a description to be placed in the Comments field (Comments are optional for Acceptable markings.) 5

Category Point Measure Acceptable/Yes Requires Action Unacceptable/No Not Applicable CATTLE Evaluate a minimum of 100 head of cattle; if the pen does not contain 100 head evaluate all cattle in the pen. Evaluate a minimum of 10 pens; if the site has less than 10 pens then evaluate all pens on the site. Use* of electric prods should be minimized. Record the number of cattle on which an electric prod is used. Calculate the percentage that are prodded and record the percentage. Number of cattle prodded Total cattle observed x 100 = % prodded *Use is defined as discharging electric current while in contact with the animal. If 10% or more of the cattle are prodded, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Driving aides Is an electric prod used on < 10% of cattle? % (Acceptable is <10.0%) Comments: Cattle should not fall* upon release from the chute. Record the number of cattle that fall. Calculate the percentage that fall and record the percentage. Number of cattle that fall Total cattle observed x 100 = % falling *Falling is defined by the animal s torso/belly touching the ground. If 2% or more of the cattle fall, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Cattle falling Falling % (Acceptable is <2.0%) Comments: Chutes Cattle should not stumble/trip* upon release from the chute. Record the number of cattle that stumble following release from the chute. Calculate the percentage that stumble/trip and record the percentage. Number of cattle that stumble Total cattle observed x 100 = % stumbling/tripping *Stumbling/tripping is defined as an animal contacting the ground with a knee. If 10% or more of the cattle stumble/trip, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Cattle stumbling/ Stumbling/tripping % (Acceptable is <10.0%) tripping Comments: Most cattle will not vocalize when in the chute, following restraint but prior to occurrence of a procedure. Record the number or cattle that vocalize following restraint but prior to occurrence of a procedure. Calculate the percentage that vocalize and record the percentage. Number of cattle that vocalize Total cattle observed x 100 = % vocalizing If 5% or more of the cattle vocalize following restraint but prior to occurrence of a procedure mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Cattle Vocalizing % (Acceptable is <5.0%) vocalizing Comments: Requires Action or Unacceptable items require a description to be placed in the Comments field (Comments are optional for Acceptable markings.) 6

Category Point Measure Acceptable/Yes Requires Action Unacceptable/No Not Applicable Most cattle will not jump or run* out of the chute following release. Record the number or cattle that jump or run upon release. Calculate the percentage that jump or run and record the percentage. Number of cattle that jump or run Total cattle observed x 100 = % jumping or running *Do not count trotting as running. Chutes If 25% or more of the cattle jump or run upon release from the chute, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Cattle jumping Jumping or running % (Acceptable is <25.0%) or running Comments: Chutes should be operated such that the position of the animal is readjusted if it is improperly caught*. Record the number of cattle that are miscaught. Calculate the percentage that are miscaught and record the percentage. Number of cattle that are miscaught Total cattle observed x 100 = % miscaught Chute Operation *Miscaught is defined as the animal being in any position other than with its head fully outside of the chute and the balance of the body within the chute, or if an animal is caught in the tail/back gate and not released. If any cattle are miscaught and not readjusted, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Chute Miscaught % (Acceptable is 0.0%) operation / Miscaught Comments: Stocking Rate/Space Is space available for cattle to be able to stand up, lie down, move freely and allow for feedyard environmental management? Evaluate a minimum of 10 pens of cattle and evaluate the stocking (if feedyard has less than 10 pens, evaluate all pens). Calculate the percentage that have sufficient space and record the percentage. Number of pens that have sufficient space Total pens observed x 100 = % with sufficient space If all of the pens have sufficient space, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Stocking rate / Cattle can stand up, lie down and move freely? space Comments: Requires Action or Unacceptable items require a description to be placed in the Comments field (Comments are optional for Acceptable markings.) 7

Category Point Measure Acceptable/Yes Mud Score Requires Action Unacceptable/No Not Applicable Cattle should have a dry area to lie down and rest. Additionally, they should be able to get to feed and water without being required to wade through mud more than four inches above their fetlock or mid cannon bone. Evaluate a minimum of 10 pens of cattle and review the pen including the cattle and the pen/mud conditions (if feedyard has less than 10 pens, evaluate all pens). Calculate the percentage of pens where pens are maintained to help cattle have a dry resting area and eliminate wading through mud and record the percentage. Number of pens maintained as noted above Total pens observed x 100 = % pens maintained to help cattle have a dry resting area and eliminate wading through mud. If 70% or more of pens are maintained in a manner to help cattle have a dry resting area and eliminate wading through mud, or mud is present yet there are obvious preparations or current efforts underway to manage muddy conditions, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Mud score Are pens maintained in a manner to help cattle have a dry resting area and eliminate wading through mud? Comments: FEEDING/WATER Clean and clear water should be available at all times. Tanks should not have manure, excessive buildup of algae, or other foreign material. Evaluate a minimum of 10 tanks (if the site has less than 10 tanks then evaluate all tanks). Calculate the percentage that have clean and clear water and record the percentage. Number of tanks with clean and clear water Total tanks observed x 100 = % with clean and clear water. If 70% or more of the tanks have clean and clear water, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Water Water access / cleanliness Comments: Adequate, clean and clear water supply (i.e. no long-term build-up of manure, algae, etc.) Feeding Feed bunks should be accessible for cattle and they should be clean and free of spoiled, moldy, sour, packed, or unpalatable feed. Evaluate a minimum of 10 bunks (if the site has less than 10 bunks then evaluate all bunks). Calculate the percentage that are clean and free of spoiled, moldy, sour, packed or unpalatable feed and record the percentage. Number of bunks clean Total bunks observed x 100 = % clean bunks. If 70% or more of the bunks are clean and free of spoiled, moldy, sour, packed or unpalatable feed, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Feed bunks Are feed bunks clean and accessible? Comments: MAINTAINANCE The unloading area should be well-maintained, have non-slip footing, and be free of distractions and potentially harmful items. Feeding If the unloading area meets the above criteria, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Unloading area Well-maintained, non-slip footing, no broken gates/fencing/etc. Comments: 8

Category Point Measure Acceptable/Yes Requires Action Unacceptable/No Not Applicable The loading area should be well-maintained, have non-slip footing, and be free of distractions and potentially harmful items. If the loading area meets the above criteria, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Loading area Well-maintained, non-slip footing, no broken gates/fencing/etc. Comments: The processing area should be well-maintained, have non-slip footing, and be free of distractions and potentially harmful items. If the processing area meets the above criteria, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Processing Well-maintained, non-slip footing, no broken gates/fencing/etc. area Comments: Maintenance The hospital area should be well-maintained, have non-slip footing, and be free of distractions and potentially harmful items. If the hospital area meets the above criteria, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Hospital area Well-maintained, non-slip footing, no broken gates/fencing, feed and water readily available, etc. Comments: Euthanasia equipment should be maintained in good repair and available to trained personnel at all times or ready access to veterinary services should be available. If primary and secondary euthanasia tools are in good repair and accessible to trained personnel or veterinary access is readily available, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Euthanasia area Comments: Are primary and secondary euthanasia tools in good repair and accessible for use by trained personnel, or is veterinary access readily available? Machinery should be cleaned and disinfected when different materials are to be contacted (i.e. use for dead animals vs. manure vs. feed). If machinery is cleaned and disinfected when use is changed, mark Acceptable/Yes. If not, mark Unacceptable/No and complete the comments section. Machinery Is machinery, including trucks and loaders, cleaned and disinfected to maintain biosecurity? Comments: 9

Each box represents 1 observed animal. If a criteria item listed is observed, place each corresponding letter in the box for that animal. If none are observed the box will remain blank. For example, if the 5th animal observed is prodded with an electric prod and the animal jumped when exiting the chute, then Box 5 would have an E and J entered in it. Cattle Handling Observation Scoresheet TO - Total Observed Max. less than P/F E - Electric Prod used / TO x 100 = % 10% P/F F - Fell upon release from chute / TO x 100 = % 2% P/F S - Stumbled / Tripped when released / TO x 100 = % 10% P/F V - Vocalized in chute before procedures / TO x 100 = % 5% P/F J - Jumped or Ran when released / TO x 100 = % 25% P/F M - Miscaught and not readjusted / TO x 100 = % 0% P/F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 Comments: 10 BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT

Pen/Equipment Observation Scoresheet TO - Total Observed Min. = P/F S - Stocking Rate/Space is o.k. / TO x 100 = % 0% P/F PM - Pen/Mud is o.k. / TO x 100 = % 70% P/F W - Water is accessible / TO x 100 = % 70% P/F F - Feedbunks accessible/clean / TO x 100 = % 70% P/F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Comments: BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT 11

THE CATTLE INDUSTRY S GUIDELINES FOR THE CARE AND HANDLING OF CATTLE 12 BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT

The Cattle Industry s Guidelines for the Care and Handling of Cattle INTRODUCTION Cattlemen have long recognized the need to properly care for livestock. Sound animal husbandry practices, based on decades of practical experience and research, are known to impact the well- being of cattle, individual animal health and herd productivity. Cattle are produced in very diverse environments and geographic locations in the United States. There is not one specific set of production practices that can be recommended for all cattle producers. Personal experience, Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) training and professional judgment can serve as a valuable resource for providing proper animal care. The following information is to be used as an educational resource, all production practices should be adapted to specific needs of individual operations. FEEDING AND NUTRITION Diets for all classes of beef cattle should meet the recommendations of the National Research Council (NRC) and/or recommendations of a nutritional consultant. For local recommendations and advice, contact your state agricultural extension as a potential resource. Cattle must have access to an adequate water supply. Estimated water requirements for all classes of beef cattle in various production settings are described in the National Academy of Sciences NRC Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Provide adequate feed. Avoid feed and water interruption longer than 24 hours. Feedstuffs and feed ingredients should be of satisfactory quality to meet nutritional needs. Under certain circumstances (e.g., droughts, frosts, and floods), test feedstuffs or other dietary components to determine the presence of substances that can be detrimental to cattle well-being, such as nitrates, prussic acid, mycotoxins, etc. Producers should become familiar with potential micronutrient deficiencies or excesses in their respective geographical areas and use appropriately formulated supplements. Use only USDA, FDA and EPA approved products for use in cattle. These products must be used in accordance with the approved product use guidelines. Feeding Guidelines for Beef Cows Body condition scoring of beef cows is a scientifically approved method to assess nutritional status. Body condition scores (BCS) range from 1 (emaciated) to 9 (obese). A BCS of 4-6 is most desirable for health and production. A BCS of 2 or under is not acceptable and immediate corrective action should be taken. During periods of prolonged drought and widespread shortages of hay and other feedstuffs, the average BCS of cows within a herd may temporarily decline. This is not desirable, but may be outside the cattle owner s control until drought relief is achieved. During periods of decreasing temperature, feeding plans should reflect increased energy needs. See additional Cold Stress proceedures (pg. 20) Feeding Guidelines for Stocker Cattle Stockers are raised on a wide variety of forages (native pasture, annuals, improved pasture) with minimal additional nutrient supplementation. On growing forages, stocking rates should be established that meet production goals for growth and performance. On dormant pastures, supplement cattle as needed to meet maintenance or growth requirements for the animal s weight, breed, and age as established by NRC guidelines and targeted production goals of the operation. Feeding Guidelines for Feeder Cattle Feedyard cattle can eat diverse diets, but the typical ration contains a high proportion of grain(s) (corn, milo, barley, grain by-products) and a smaller proportion of roughages (hay, straw, silage, hulls, etc.). The NRC lists the dietary requirements of beef cattle (based on weight, weather, frame score, etc.) and the feeding value of various commodities included in the diet. Consult a nutritionist (private consultant, university or feed company employee) for advice on ration formulation and feeding programs. Avoid sudden changes in ration composition or amount of ration offered. Monitor changes in weight gain, feces, incidence of digestive upsets (acidosis or bloat) and foot health to help evaluate the feeding program. BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT 13

A small percentage of cattle in feedyards develop laminitis or founder. Mild cases do not affect animal welfare or performance; however, hooves that are double their normal length compromise movement. In these instances, the individual animal should be provided appropriate care and marketed as soon as possible. DISEASE PREVENTION, HEALTH CARE, AND CATTLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Like other species, cattle are susceptible to infectious diseases, metabolic disorders, toxins, parasites, neoplasia and injury. Control programs should be based on risk assessment and efficacy of available products. Economic losses are reduced by early intervention through health management programs. Healthy herds are more productive. Management programs should be science-based and common-sense driven. The producer should work with a veterinarian to determine the risk of infectious, metabolic and toxic diseases and to develop effective management programs when designing a herd health plan. A Veterinary/Client/Patient Relationship (VCPR) is strongly encouraged. Producers and their employees should have the taining and ability to recognize common health problems and know how to properly utilize animal health products and other control measures. When prevention or control measures are ineffective, the producer should promptly contact a veterinarian for a diagnosis and treatment program to reduce animal suffering and animal losses. A Producer s Guide for Judicious Use of Antimicrobials in Cattle 1. Prevent Problems: Emphasize appropriate husbandry, management, hygiene, routine health examinations, and vaccinations. 2. Select and Use Antibiotics Carefully: Consult with your veterinarian on the selection and use of antibiotics. Have a valid reason to use an antibiotic. Therapeutic alternatives should be considered prior to using antimicrobial therapy. 3. Avoid Using Antibiotics Important In Human Medicine As First Line Therapy: Avoid using, as the first antibiotic, those medications that are important to treating strategic human or animal infections. 4. Use the Laboratory to Help You Select Antibiotics: Cultures and susceptibility test results should be used to aid in the selection of antimicrobials, as neccessary. 5. Combination Antibiotic Therapy Is Discouraged Unless There Is Clear Evidence The Specific Practice Is Beneficial: Select and utilize an antibiotic to affect a cure. 6. Avoid Inappropriate Antibiotic Use: Confine therapeutic antimicrobial use to appropriate clinical indications, avoiding inappropriate uses such as for viral infections without bacterial complication. 7. Treatment Programs Should Reflect Best Use Principles: Regimens for therapeutic antimicrobial use should be optimized using current pharmacological information and principles. 8. Treat the Fewest Number of Animals Possible: Limit antibiotic use to sick or at risk animals. 9. Treat for the Recommended Time Period: This will minimize the potential for bacteria to become resistant to antimicrobials. 10. Avoid Environmental Contamination with Antibiotics: Steps should be taken to minimize antimicrobials reaching the environment through spillage, contaminated ground run off or aerosolization. 11. Keep Records of Antibiotic Use: Accurate records of treatment and outcome should be used to evaluate therapeutic regimens and always follow proper withdrawal times. 12. Follow Label Directions: Follow label instructions and never use antibiotics other than as labeled without a valid veterinary prescription. 13. Extra-label Antibiotic Use Must follow FDA Regulations: Prescriptions, including extra label use of medications must meet the Animal Medicinal Drug Use Clarification Act (AMDUCA) amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and its regulations. This includes having a valid Veterinary/Client/ Patient Relationship (VCPR). 14. Subtherapeutic Antibiotic Use Is Discouraged: Antibiotic use should be limited to prevention or control disease. Cows It is desirable for cows to have a BCS of at least 4 before the calving season. During the calving season, cows should be checked regularly for calving difficulties. First-calf heifers may require more frequent observation and care. Producers should consider contacting a veterinarian for advice or assistance if cows or heifers have calving difficulties that cannot be corrected by the producer within a reasonable amount of time. 14 BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT

Cows with mild lameness, early eye problems, mastitis or loss of body condition should be examined to determine well-being and promptly marketed as appropriate. Calves Castration and dehorning are done for the protection of the animal, other cattle in the herd and people who handle the cattle. In all cases producers may seek guidance from a veterinarian and advisability of analgesia or anesthesia for castration and dehorning of beef cattle, particularly in older animals, where development is more advanced. Where practical, cattle should be castrated before the age of 3 months (90 days), or at the first available handling opportunity beyond this age. Where practical, cattle should be dehorned while horn development is still at the horn bud stage, or at the first available handling opportunity beyond this age. This is because at this stage in development the procedure involves less tissue trauma. The selection of polled cattle is an alternative for horn management. Weaning can be less stressful by castrating and dehorning calves early in life, vaccinating against respiratory diseases prior to weaning, and providing proper pre-weaning nutrition. Stocker and Feeder Cattle In all cases producers may seek guidance from a veterinarian on the advisability of vaccination protocols for incoming stocker and feeder cattle based on environmental and rearing conditions. The use of vaccines and parasite control should be based on risk assessment and efficacy of available animal health products. Producers may seek guidance from a veterinarian on the availability and advisability of analgesia or anesthesia for dehorning of beef cattle, particularly in older animals, where horn development is more advanced. A local anesthetic should be used when heifers are spayed using the flank approach. High risk cattle should be checked at least daily for illness, lameness or other problems during the first 30 days following arrival. Pregnancy in immature heifers can result in calving difficulties and subsequent trauma to the birth canal, paralysis or death of the heifer. For these reasons it is often more humane to abort pregnant heifers. This should be done under the direction of a veterinarian. If heifers in the feedyard or a stocker operation deliver a full-term, healthy calf, it should be allowed to nurse to obtain colostrum. At all times, these calves must be handled humanely and provided proper nutrition. Compromised calves or fetuses should be promptly euthanized and disposed of according to local regulations. Bulling is a term to describe aggressive riding of a steer by one or more penmates. Bullers should be promptly removed from the pen to prevent serious injury. Tail docking is not recommended. Increasing space per animal and proper bedding are effective means in preventing tail tip injury and necrosis. IDENTIFICATION Branding, ear-tagging, ear-notching, and radio frequency identification devices (RFID) are methods of identifying cattle. If cattle are hot iron or freeze branded, it should be accomplished quickly, expertly and with the proper equipment. BQA guidelines recommend branding on the hip area. Feeder cattle should not be re-branded when entering a feedlot unless required by law. Brands should be of appropriate size to achieve clear identification. Cattle should never be branded on the face or jaw. Ear notching may be used to identify cattle. Wattling, ear splitting and other surgical alterations for identification are strongly discouraged. SHELTER AND HOUSING Cattle in backgrounding facilities or feedyards must be offered adequate space for comfort, socialization and environmental management. Pen maintenance, including manure harvesting, will help improve pen conditions. Mud is more of a problem in the winter with low evaporation rates or improper drainage conditions. Accumulation of mud on cattle should be monitored as a measure of pen condition and cattle care in BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT 15

relation to recent weather conditions. Feedyards should use dust reduction measures to improve animal performance. Floors in housing facilities should be properly drained and barns and handling alleys should provide adequate traction to prevent injuries to animals and handlers. Handling alleys and housing pens should be free of sharp edges and protrusions to prevent injury to animals and handlers. Design and operate alleys and gates to avoid impeding cattle movement. When operating gates and catches, reduce excessive noise, which may cause distress to the animals. Adjust hydraulic or manual restraining chutes to the appropriate size of cattle to be handled. Regular cleaning and maintenance of working parts is imperative to ensure the system functions properly and is safe for the cattle and handlers. Mechanical and electrical devices used in housing facilities should be safe. CATTLE HANDLING Abuse of cattle is not acceptable under any circumstances. Cattle should not be whipped or hit with objects that could cause injury, pain, or harm. Kicking, prodding, or any other forceful actions should not be used on non-ambulatory cattle. The use of sharp or hard solid objects to move cattle is not acceptable. Avoid slippery surfaces, especially where cattle enter a single file alley leading to a chute or where they exit the chute. Grooved concrete, metal grating (not sharp), rubber mats or deep sand can be used to minimize slipping and falling. Quiet handling is essential to minimize slipping. Under most conditions, no more than 2% of the animals should fall outside the chute. A level of more than 2% indicates a review of the process may be of value, including asking questions such as: is this a cattle temperament issue, has something in the handling area changed that is affecting cattle behavior, etc.? Take advantage of cattle s flight zone and point of balance to move them. For safety and welfare reasons, minimize the use of electric prods. Non-electric driving aids, such as plastic paddles, sorting sticks, flags or streamers (affixed to long handles) should be used to quietly guide and turn animals. When cattle continuously balk, cattle handlers should investigate and correct the reason rather than resort to overuse of electric prods. Under desirable conditions, 90% or more of cattle should flow through cattle handling systems without the use of electric prods. When cattle prods must be used, avoid contact with sensitive areas including the eyes, rectum, genitalia and udder. Driving aids powered by AC current should never be used unless manufactured and labeled specifically for that purpose. Some cattle are naturally more prone to vocalize, but if more than 5% of cattle vocalize (after being squeezed but prior to procedures being performed) it may be an indication that chute operation should be evaluated. If more than 25% of cattle jump or run out of the chute there should be a review of the situation and questions asked such as: is this a result from cattle temperament or prior handling issue, was the chute operating properly, etc.? Properly trained dogs can be effective and humane tools for cattle handling. Insure that barking or impeding cattle flow is minimized. Cattle handling facilities can be evaluated using the BQA Assessment tools provided at bqa.org MARKETING CATTLE The overwhelming majority of cattle are marketed in good health and physical condition. Compromised cattle should not enter intermediate marketing channels because of animal welfare concerns. Depending upon the severity of the condition, processing plant policy, and state or USDA regulations, cattle healthy enough to enter the food supply should be sold directly to a processing plant. Non-ambulatory animals should be humanely euthanized (see Humane Euthanasia section). 16 BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT

TRANSPORTATION Knowingly inflicting physical injury or unnecessary pain on cattle when loading, unloading or transporting animals is not acceptable. Cattle sorting and holding pens should allow handling without undue stress, be located near the loading/unloading facility and be suitable for herd size. Provide properly designed and maintained loading facilities for easy and safe animal movement. Proper design of loading chutes as well as personnel that are knowledgeable of their proper use can assure the safety of both cattle and cattle handlers. Ramps and chutes should be strong and solid, provide non-slip footing, and have sides high enough to keep cattle from falling or jumping off. A ramp angle of 25 degrees or less will improve cattle movement. All vehicles used to transport cattle should provide for the safety of personnel and cattle during loading, transporting and unloading. Strictly adhere to safe load levels with regard to animal weight and space allocation. Producers hauling cattle in farm and ranch trailers must ensure that adequate space is provided so that cattle have sufficient room to stand with little risk of being forced down because of overcrowding. Cattle that are unable to withstand the rigors of transportation should not be shipped. When the vehicle is not full, safely partition cattle into smaller areas to provide stability for the cattle and the vehicle. No gap which would allow injury to an animal should exist between the ramp, its sides, and the vehicle. Vehicle doors and internal gates should be sufficiently wide to permit cattle to pass through easily without bruising or injury. Cattle should be loaded, unloaded, and moved through facilities with patience and as quietly as possible to reduce stress and injury. NON-AMBULATORY (DOWNER) CATTLE Marketing cattle promptly before this issue occurs will promote better quality of life for the animal and be more efficient for the operation. A prompt diagnosis should be made to determine whether the animal should be humanely euthanized or receive additional care. Provide adequate feed and water to non-ambulatory cattle at least once daily. Move downer animals very carefully to avoid compromising animal welfare. Acceptable methods of transporting downers include a sled, low-boy trailer or in the bucket of a loader. Dragging downer animals is unacceptable. Likewise, animals should not be lifted with chains onto transportation conveyances. Animals should not be scooped into a frontloader bucket, but rather should be humanely rolled into the bucket by caretakers. When treatment is attempted, cattle unable to sit up unaided (i.e. lie flat on their side) and which refuse to eat or drink should be humanely euthanized within 24-36 hours of initial onset. Even though signs of a more favorable prognosis may exist, cattle that are non-ambulatory must not be sent to a livestock market or to a processing facility. HUMANE EUTHANASIA Euthanasia is humane death occurring without pain and suffering, it should be utilized when an animal s condition is such that additional treatment options will not be effective. The decision to euthanize an animal should consider the animal s welfare. The producer will most likely perform on-farm euthanasia because a veterinarian may not be immediately available to perform the service. Persons who perform this task must be technically proficient and have an understanding of the relevant anatomical landmarks and the protocols used for humane euthanasia of animals. When euthanasia is necessary, an excellent reference is the BQA Euthanasia of Cattle and Calves guidelines. Reasons for euthanasia include: Fractures of the legs, hip or spine that are not repairable and result in immobility or inability to stand Emergency medical conditions that result in excruciating pain that cannot be relieved by treatment Animals that are too weak to be transported due to debilitation from disease or injury Paralysis from traumatic injuries or disease that result in immobility Disease conditions where no effective treatment is known, prognosis is terminal, or a significant threat to human health is present. BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT 17

Methods of Euthanasia in Cattle Acceptable methods for conducting euthanasia in cattle include gunshot and penetrating captive bolt with a secondary step to insure death. Firearms for Conducting Euthanasia in Cattle Gunshot is the most common method used for on-farm euthanasia of cattle. Effectiveness depends upon selection of the appropriate caliber of firearm, type of bullet or shot/shell, and accuracy of aim. Animal/ Firearm Calves Adult Handgun Rifle Shotgun.32 to.45 caliber Solid-point bullet.38 to.45 caliber Solid-point bullet.22 LR caliber or larger Solid-point bullet.22 magnum or higher caliber 1 Solid-point bullet.410 to 12 gauge #4-6 birdshot or slug 20 to 12 gauge #4-6 birdshot or slug (within 3 feet) 1.22 LR is discouraged for use in euthanasia of adult cattle because it lacks sufficient ballistic energy to yield consistent results. Higher caliber rifles should be avoided as bullets may exit the body and place by-standers in danger. Penetrating Captive Bolt for Conducting Euthanasia of Cattle Captive bolt guns are designed to cause damage to the brain sufficient to cause an immediate loss of consciousness. However, death is not certain in all cases. Therefore use of penetrating captive bolt should be followed with a secondary step to assure death. Methods used to assure death include a second or third shot if necessary, exsanguination (bleeding out), or use of a pithing rod. Anatomical Landmarks Current information for adult cattle and calves indicates that the point of entry of the projectile should be at (or slightly above) the intersection of two imaginary lines, each drawn from the outside corner of the eye to the center of the base of the opposite horn. If a firearm is used it should be used within 3 feet of the target when possible and positioned so that the muzzle is perpendicular to the skull to avoid ricochet. When using penetrating captive bolt, operators are advised to restrain the head so that the captive bolt may be held flush with the skull. Indications of Unconsciousness When conducting euthanasia procedures one should always observe animals for the following behaviors: Animal collapses immediately when shot and makes no attempt to right itself Body and muscles become rigid immediately upon collapse followed by relaxation of the body, brief tetanic spasms and eventually uncoordinated hind limb movements An absence of vocalization An absence of eye reflexes and eyelids remain open facing straight forward Immediate and sustained cessation of rhythmic breathing These signs should be observed and monitored in all animals for which euthanasia procedures have been applied. Animals that attempt to right themselves, vocalize, blink with their eyes or begin rhythmic breathing are likely returning to a conscious state. In these cases one should immediately recheck the anatomical site used and re-shoot or re-apply the captive bolt. Confirmation of Death Criteria to be used for confirmation of death include lack of pulse, breathing, lack of corneal reflex, response to firm toe pinch (as with a hoof tester), failure to detect/hear respiratory sounds or heart beat by use of a stethoscope, graying of the mucous membranes, and rigor mortis. None of these signs alone, with exception of rigor mortis, confirms death. Rechecking of the animal for these parameters after a period of 20 minutes is a very useful method for confirmation of death. HEAT STRESS PROCEDURES During periods of high heat and humidity and little wind, actions should be taken to minimize the effects of heat stress as cattle are processed and managed. Provide adequate water. If possible, avoid handling cattle when the risk of heat stress is high. The final decision must consider temperature, humidity, wind speed, phenotype and cattle acclimation. If cattle must be handled, a general rule is to work them before the Temperature Humidity Index (THI) reaches 84, if possible. 18 BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT

As an example, when the temperature is 98 o F and the humidity is 30%, the THI is 83. At a constant temperature, the THI increases as the relative humidity increases. Each one mile per hour increase in wind speed decreases the THI by approximately one point. Work cattle more prone to heat stress first, earlier in the day or later if conditions moderate. For example, larger cattle should be processed during periods of lower THI. Limit the time cattle spend in handling facilities where heat stress may be more significant. Heat management tools, such as shades and sprinklers, should be considered if sufficient natural shade is not available. When heat stress is extreme Ensure adequate drinking water is available. Move or process cattle during the cooler part of the day. Heat management tools, such as shades and sprinklers, should be considered if sufficient natural shade is not available. COLD STRESS PROCEDURES Cattle exposed to cold require more energy for maintenance, and performance will be reduced if action is not taken to provide for it. Some suggestions for reducing winter stress and maintaining production in cold weather are: Adjust feed and energy rations to match performance requirements when cattle reach low critical temperature. Provide wind breaks and shelters to reduce wind, moisture, and mud. Construct feedlots and buildings in a manner that reduces winter stress due to temperature and moisture. Provide bedding in severe conditions to allow cattle to lie down without direct contact with frozen ground. Cattle will voluntarily seek protection from severe weather conditions if it is available. Modest protection by either natural or manmade structures can greatly reduce effects of extreme cold by allowing exposure to be intermittent rather than continuous. TRAINING AND EDUCATION Management practices should be informally assessed every day to ensure that animal welfare is not compromised. Regardless, producers are encouraged to implement a system to verify efforts directed towards animal care and handling. This can be accomplished by: Establishing a network of resources on cattle care Following the Cattle Care and Handling Guidelines Record training and education activities Conducting self-audits or external audits of animal care and handling procedures Self-assessment guides are available online at bqa.org BQA training and certification programs For more information go to bqa.org Informal self-reviews should be periodically conducted by those involved with cattle feeding and care. Training of those who handle cattle should include: An understanding of the animal s point of balance and flight-zone Avoiding sudden movements, loud noises or other actions that may frighten cattle Proper handling of aggressive/easily excited cattle to ensure the welfare of the cattle and safety of cattle handlers Proper use of handling and restraining devices Recognizing early signs of distress and disease How to properly diagnose common illnesses and provide proper care Judicious use of animal health products and how to responsibly perform routine animal health procedures Recognizing signs associated with extreme weather stress and how to respond with appropriate actions Basic feeding/nutritional management of beef cattle Temperature (⁰F) Beef Cattle Temperature Humidity Index Relative Humidity (%) 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 100 84 85 86 87 88 90 91 92 93 94 95 97 98 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 93 94 95 96 81 82 83 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 85 86 87 88 89 90 78 79 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 86 87 88 76 77 78 79 80 81 81 82 83 84 85 86 86 75 76 77 78 78 79 80 81 81 82 83 84 84 74 75 75 76 77 78 78 79 80 80 81 82 82 73 73 74 75 75 76 77 77 78 79 79 80 80 72 72 73 73 74 75 75 76 76 77 78 78 78 70 71 71 72 73 73 74 74 75 75 76 76 76 69 70 70 71 71 72 72 73 73 74 74 75 Temperature Humidity Index (THI) Normal <75 Alert 75-78 Danger 79-83 Emergency >84 BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE TM FEEDYARD ASSESSMENT 19