Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

Similar documents
On- farm milk culture training workshop

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

On-farm milk culture training workshop. Christina Petersson-Wolfe Department of Dairy Science Virginia Tech

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

How to Decrease the Use of Antibiotics in Udder Health Management

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

Validation of the PathoProof TM Mastitis PCR Assay for Bacterial Identification from Milk Recording Samples

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

Trouble-Shooting a Mastitis Problem Herd 1

TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Interpretation of results from milk samples tested for mastitis bacteria with Mastit 4 qpcr test from DNA Diagnostic

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2016 Project Report

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

Mastitis Module Risk Assessment Guide by Pathogen. Streptococcus agalactiae

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

, Pamela L. Ruegg

Emerging Mastitis Threats on the Dairy Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM Dept. of Dairy Science

Practical Strategies for Treating Mastitis Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

Mastitis: The Canadian Perspective

Sources of Different Mastitis Organisms and Their Control

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

Quad Plate User s Manual

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Mastitis and On-Farm Milk Cultures - A Field Study - Part 1

Association between teat skin colonization and intramammary infections with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

Evaluation of a new qpcr test to specify reasons behind total bacterial count in bulk tank milk

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

Update on Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis. John R. Middleton College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

Proper Dry-Off Procedures to Prevent New Infections and Cure Existing Cases of Mastitis. Stephen C. Nickerson University of Georgia

Post Milking Teat Disinfection. Prevention of Contagious and Environmental Mastitis

TREATMENT DECISIONS FOR MILD AND MODERATE CASES OF CLINICAL MASTITIS. Carolina Pinzón-Sánchez

Mastitis Management and SCC Control in Once a Day Herds. Don Crowley- Teagasc

29/11/2017. Best Milking Practices. Greg Strait- Fulton County Extension Amber Yutzy- Huntingdon County Extension

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Quality Milk. got milk? Milk Quality. Why Bacteria in Milk Matters. Bacteria in Milk. Milk.One of Mother Nature s Most Perfect Foods

Heifer Mastitis Management Strategies S.C. Nickerson, UGA,

Profitable Milk System

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Lincomycin (as Lincomycin hydrochloride) Neomycin (as Neomycin sulphate) Excipients Disodium edetate

Last 2-3 months of lactation

Best practice guide for on-farm mastitis control

Selective Antibiotic Treatment for Dairy Cow Mastitis 1

MASTITIS PATHOGENS IN MILK OF DAIRY COWS IN SLOVAKIA

A PRACTISING VETS APPROACH TO THE HIGH CELL COUNT HERD

10 Smart Things Dairy Farms Do To Achieve Milking Excellence

USING MANURE SOLIDS AS BEDDING Final Report. CORNELL WASTE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE Ithaca, NY

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

Dairy Calf, BVDv-PI Dead & Chronic Monitoring Program

Pathogens commonly isolated from selected diseases

CLINICAL MASTITIS PERCEPTIONS OF KANSAS DAIRY PRODUCERS. J.R. Roberson 1

Mastitis Reminders and Resources LAURA SIEGLE EXTENSION AGENT VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AMELIA COUNTY

April Boll Iowa State University. Leo L. Timms Iowa State University. Recommended Citation

MASTITIS AND ITS CONTROL

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

Bulk Milk Data and Udder Health

Milk Secretion and Quality Standards

Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018, 17(6): Available online at ScienceDirect

cure was 0.79 for ceftiofur-treated cows and 0.76 for control-treated cows, whereas the overall bacteriological

F-MC-2: Dealing with Streptococcus agalactiae Mastitis

DAIRY VETERINARY NEWSLETTER

Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation

Vaccination as a Tool to Reduce Mastitis and Improve Milk Quality in Dairy Goats. F.M. Kautz, S. C. Nickerson, and L. O. Ely.

Milking Management II - Mastitis 1

Lactation. Macroscopic Anatomy of the Mammary Gland. Anatomy AS 1124

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

The Uncommon. Bacillus cereus Clost. Perfringens Nocardia spp. Mycoplasma spp. Moulds and yeasts Pseudomonas spp.

MICROBIOLOGY of RAW MILK

Pathogen Identification And Incidence Rates Of Clinical Mastitis On Organic And Conventional Dairy Farms

PREVALENCE OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT BACTERIA IN THREE SELECTED CATTLE, FARMS IN SERDANG, SELANGORAND KLUANG, JOHOR

The use of on-farm culture systems for making treatment decisions

Veterinaria.com.pt 2009; Vol. 1 Nº 1: e13 (publicação inicial em Julho de 2008) Disponível em

Understanding the Sources, Transmission Routes, and Prognoses for Mastitis Pathogens

J. Dairy Sci. 90: doi: /jds American Dairy Science Association, 2007.

RISKS, REALITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH MASTITIS TREATMENTS

MILK QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR TRANSITION COWS AND HEIFERS. Leo Timms Iowa State University, Ames IA

Analysis of the microbial population that most often causes mastitis in dairy cows

Use of a staphylococcal vaccine to reduce prevalence of mastitis and lower somatic cell counts in a registered Saanen dairy goat herd

Options for Handling Mastitis during Lactation in Modern Dairy Farms

Innovation in Mastitis Treatment

Gina M Pighetti & Raul Almeida. University of Tennessee

Transcription:

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis EnZtek Diagnostics Incorporated has investigated and successfully conducted on-the-farm testing of milk samples to detect elevated levels of bacteria present as a means of quickly identifying cases of Mastitis due to bacterial infection. The most common test used to check for Mastitis is a Somatic Cell Count (SCC) test which tests each of the four quarters of the cow s udders. Somatic cells are composed of white blood cells and occasional sloughed epithelial cells. The Somatic Cell test performed is the CMT, or California Mastitis Test. The CMT reagent is simply a detergent plus bromcresol purple (used as an indicator of ph). The degree of reaction between the detergent and the DNA of cell nuclei is a measure of the number of somatic cells in milk. The relationship between SCC (Somatic Cell Count) values and CMT is not precise because of the high degree of variability in SCC values of each CMT score. (1) Additionally, the test must be read in a matter of seconds as the reaction disappears within 20 seconds. The sensitivity of the CMT is reported to be 66.7% and specificity of 54.8%. When the CMT was used for selective dry cow therapy the CMT test correctly identified 75%-80% of infected cows depending upon the study and type of pathogens present. However, it was concluded that a large percentage of uninfected quarter would receive dry cow therapy because 23% - 40% of animals without infections with major pathogens were detected by CMT.(2) The focus of this study however, is to actually detect bacteria. Disease causing bacteria are called pathogens. The most common mastitis pathogens are found in the udder tissues, spreading from cow-to-cow (contagious pathogens) or in the herd s surroundings (environmental pathogens), such as bedding materials, manure and soil. This distinction may be important when assessing the challenges present in a herd and the measures which may be taken to reduce or treat mastitis.(3)

The chart below describes environmental mastitis pathogens, and contagious pathogens: Classification Bacteria Contagious or Source Spread Control Treatment* Staphylococcus spp. Staph. aureus Contagious Infected udders, hands of milkers Milking time Post-dip, DCT 1, segregation and cull if necessary Label recommendations for broad-spectrum antibiotics, if early lactation 5-7 d pirlimycin, do not treat chronic infections Coagulase (-) staph. & S. hyicus Neither Skin flora & occasionally environment Infect teat canal from skin sources Post-dip, DCT Treat clinical cases (broad spectrum), DCT Strep. agalactiae Contagious Infected udders Milking time Milking time hygiene, postdip, DCT Label recommendations for broad-spectrum antibiotics Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. Strep. dysgalactiae Strep. uberis strep & Enterococcus spp. Contagious and environmental Infected udders and environment Environment early dry period Environment Milking time & environmental New IMI 2 during early dry period Milking time hygiene, pre- & post-dip, DCT, teat seal Milking time hygiene, pre- & post-dip, DCT, teat seal Milking time hygiene, pre- & post-dip, DCT, teat seal Label recommendations for broad-spectrum antibiotics Label recommendations for broad-spectrum antibiotics and consider IMM 3 therapy 4-5 d penicillin systemically (3.5 cc/100 lb body weight)** Continues Next Page

Escherichia coli Bedding, manure, soil Klebsiella spp. Organic bedding Enterobacter spp. Bedding, manure, soil Cows clean & dry, use of sand bedding, pre-dip, a J5 vaccine Avoid sawdust & recycled manure, predip, J5 vaccine Cows clean & dry, use of sand bedding, pre-dip, a J5 vaccine Do not treat local cases. Systemic cases 2-3 L hypertonic saline IV, followed by oral fluid therapy, NSAID*** and injectable antibiotics Gram negatives Serratia spp. Soil and plants Cows clean & dry, pre-dip (no chlorhexidine products) Pseudomonas spp. Water & wet bedding No water use in parlor, no cooling ponds, sand bedding, a J5 vaccine 180-300 ml hypertonic saline IMM infusion Proteus spp. Bedding, feed & water Not much known, use of sand bedding, a J5 vaccine Pasteurella spp. Probably contagious Upper respiratory tract of mammals and birds Unknown likely cow to cow Prevent teat injuries, remove affected cows from herd Do not respond to IMM treatment Continues Next Page

Yeast & mold Soil, plants, water Dirty infusions Aseptic infusions No treatment Corynebacterium bovis & other coryneforms Contagious Infected udders Cow to cow Post-dip Treat clinical cases and DCT Other Prototheca Soil, plants, water Dirty infusions, infected udders Aseptic infusions, eliminate infected cow No treatment cull cow Bacillus spp. Soil, water, air Dirty infusions Arcanobacterium pyogenes Contagious/Environm ental Aseptic infusions Teat injuries Flies Fly control Broad-spectrum antibiotic Kill affected quarter or remove from herd Information obtained from NMC Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis and veterinary consultation for treatment recommendations). *These are general treatment recommendations; actual recommendations may vary from herd to herd. Please consult your veterinarian. **Extra label usage; please consult your veterinarian before starting this protocol. ***Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 1 DCT, dry cow therapy; 2 IMI, intramammary infection; 3 IMM, intramammary. As indicated by the chart above, the primary area of concern is Gram Positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureas and Streptococcus.(4) The EnZtek assays for Total Aerobic Organisms (detects gram positive and gram negative) and the Gram Negative Aerobic Bacteria (detects gram negative) can be utilized for this purpose. Additionally, the EnZtek assay for Staphylococcus aureus can be used to identify the presence of that specific gram positive bacteria. The EnZtek assays are designed to be used On-The-Farm and can provide results within 30 minutes from sample collection directly from the cow. There have been other on-the-farm products available, such as the 3M Petrifim on-the-farm culture system (POFCS). However, this system will not provide results until after a 24 hour incubation. While the 3M product tested with accuracy of 93.8% in their laboratory trials, in the hands of the producers it was reduced to and overall sensitivity and specificity of 63.8% and 48.4%, respectively. (5) References: (1) Milk Quality and Mastitis Tests, Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM, Douglas J. Reinemann, PhD University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2002 (2) Milk Quality and Mastitis Tests, Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM, Douglas J. Reinemann, PhD University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2002 (3) dairy.co.org.uk,2012 (4) On-Farm Culture Use Experience and Impact on Antimicrobial Use, Greg Keefe, Kimberley MacDonald and Marguerite Cameron, Maritime Quality Milk, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE CANADA, 2012 (5) On-Farm Culture Use Experience and Impact on Antimicrobial Use, Greg Keefe, Kimberley MacDonald and Marguerite Cameron, Maritime Quality Milk, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE CANADA, 2012

EnZtek tests detect the enzymes produced by bacteria, and a healthy bacteria can produce thousands of molecules of the target enzyme. Most other bacteria detection tests need to find an actual bacteria cell, which requires the bacteria to grow, and this takes time, usually 24 hours or more of incubation. Even PCR bacteria tests must grow the bacteria before enough DNA can be obtained and replicated. Bacterial Enzymes (light green) EnZtek develops substrates which identify the target enzyme produced by the target bacteria, and a match is made, resulting in a detectable reaction. This is depicted in the Lock and Key Analogy diagram. This reaction can be seen with an easy to see color reaction or fluorescence, or it can be seen as a numerical reading on a fluorometer.

During on-site testing, tests were conducted on seven suspect milk samples (6031, 1979, 2367, 1925, 6947, 2638, 1301), using the EnZquik handheld fluorometer and EnZquik Fluorescent Assays. The fluorometer results are in RFU or Relative Fluorescent Units. The seven milk samples were tested following the EnZquik procedures for testing at a dairy by comparing each suspect milk sample to a known healthy cow milk sample. A healthy cow milk sample was used as a control. The testing was intended as a presumptive screen to detect elevated levels of bacteria which would be an indication of Mastitis. The tests performed were for Total Aerobic Organisms, Gram Negative Aerobic Bacteria, E.coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Since many substances fluoresce, a positive result from reactions between the substrate and the bacterial enzyme is indicated when the sample has a higher RFU reading than the control. As both the control and sample will have some natural hydrolysis, the cut-off value is usually a difference of 1,000 RFU or more for a positive result. All readings are recorded after 10 minutes of reaction time. This allows for On-The-Spot results.

These next pages provide the results for the milk samples: Total Aerobic Organisms difference Samples 10 minute Readings sample less control result Control 5121 6031 32648 27527 high positive Control 4739 1979 19469 14730 medium positive Control 5042 2367 7980 2938 low positive Control 5502 1925 7900 2398 low positive Control 5120 6947 21155 16035 medium positive Control 4713 2638 6457 1744 low positive Control 5610 1301 48996 43386 high positive Gram Negative Aerobic Bacteria difference Samples 10 minute Readings sample less control result Control 16247 6031 22158 5911 medium positive Control 19567 1979 16407-3160 negative Control 19023 2367 25551 6528 medium positive Control 20598 1925 35746 15148 high positive Control 19695 6947 4870-14825 negative Control 18822 2638 25405 6583 medium positive Control 22878 1301 32084 9206 medium positive The control RFU value is subtracted from the sample RFU. If the difference is 1,000 RFU or higher, the result is positive. All of the milk samples tested positive for Total Aerobic Organisms using the handheld fluorometer and fluorescent assays. The control RFU value is subtracted from the sample RFU. If the difference is 1,000 RFU or higher, the result is positive. Milk samples 6031, 2367, 1925, 2638, and 1301 tested positive for Gram Negative Aerobic Bacteria using the handheld fluorometer and fluorescent assays. Milk samples 1979 and 6947 tested negative for Gram Negative Aerobic Bacteria using the handheld fluorometer and fluorescent assays.

E.coli difference Samples 10 minute Readings sample less control result Control 1548 6031 2522 974 negative Control 1713 1979 2497 784 negative Control 1283 2367 1246-37 negative Control 1720 1925 2760 1040 low positive Control 1163 6947 4801 3638 high positive Control 1650 2638 2103 453 negative Control 1727 1301 3987 2260 medium positive Staphyloc occus aureus difference Samples 10 minute Readings sample less control result Control 3333 6031 60141 56808 high positive Control 3783 1979 21246 17463 low positive Control 3336 2367 9514 6178 low positive Control 3455 1925 8915 5460 low positive Control 3534 6947 40232 36698 medium positive Control 3757 2638 4632 875 negative Control 3828 1301 78775 74947 high positive The control RFU value is subtracted from the sample RFU. If the difference is 1,00 RFU or higher, the result is positive. Milk samples 1925, 6947, and 1301 tested positive for E.coli using the handheld fluorometer and fluorescent assays. Milk samples 6031, 1979, 2367 and 2638 tested negative for E.coli using the handheld fluorometer and fluorescent assays. The control RFU value is subtracted from the sample RFU. If the difference is 1,000 RFU or higher, the result is positive. Milk samples 6031, 1979. 2367, 1925, 6947, and 1301 tested positive for Staphylococcis aureus using the handheld fluorometer and fluorescent assays. Milk samples 2638 tested negative for Staphylococcus aureus using the handheld fluorometer and fluorescent assays.

Below is an overview of all of the fluorescent results: Sample Total Organisms Gram Negative Total Coliforms E.coli Staphylococcus aureus 6031 xxx xx neg xxx 1979 xx neg neg x 2367 x xx neg x 1925 x xxx x x 6947 xx neg xxx xx 2638 x xx neg neg 1301 xxx xx xx xxx x=low xx=med xxx=high

Conclusion: A thorough examination of the seven milk samples was conducted using the EnZquik handheld fluormeter and EnZquik Fluorescent Assays. Positive results were successfully obtained on site at the dairy providing results within minutes. Performing the test including the 10 minute reaction time, yields results in less than 30 minutes. This conclusion reconfirms EnZtek s goal for the EnZquik Fluorescent Assays and handheld fluorometer to be used On-Site and provide test results within minutes of sample collection to identify elevated levels present as an indicator for Mastitis. Sample Total Organisms Gram Negative Total Coliforms E.coli Staphylococcus aureus 6031 xxx xx neg xxx 1979 xx neg neg x 2367 x xx neg x 1925 x xxx x x 6947 xx neg xxx xx 2638 x xx neg neg 1301 xxx xx xx xxx x=low xx=med xxx=high