PECTUS DEFORMITY REPAIR

Similar documents
PECTUS DEFORMITY REPAIR

Chest Wall Deformities What about Ravitch? D. Dean Potter, M.D. 12/10/07

Pectus Excavatum: A New Perspective on Correction Derek Blankenship COA Texas Tech University

Pectus Excavatum (Funnel Chest) Dr Hasan Nugud Consultant Paediatric Surgeon

Pectus Defects: An Update on Options and Timing of Treatment OBJECTIVES. Sohail R. Shah, MD, MSHA Pediatric Surgery

Roundtable Presentation Pectus Excavatum

When to Call a Pediatric Surgeon. Kim Ruscher Wife, Mom, Pediatric Surgeon

In 1998 a minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum

A 10-Year Review of a Minimally Invasive Technique for the Correction of Pectus Excavatum

Clinical Characteristics and Thoracic factors in patients with Idiopathic and Syndromic Scoliosis Associated with Pectus Excavatum

Pectus excavatum from a pediatric surgeon s perspective

The sandwich technique for repair of pectus carinatum and excavatum/carinatum complex

Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum

Clinical Policy: Linezolid (Zyvox) Reference Number: CP.PMN.27 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: HIM*, Medicaid

Development of New Cardiac Deformity Indexes for Pectus Excavatum on Computed Tomography: Feasibility for Pre- and Post-Operative Evaluation

Surgical Correction of Chest Wall Deformities

Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital COSMETIC

Patient Guide to. Chest Wall Deformities. uwhealthkids.org

Clinical Policy: Linezolid (Zyvox) Reference Number: CP.PMN.27 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: Oregon Health Plan

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

Prior Authorization Review Panel MCO Policy Submission

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

Diminished pulmonary function in pectus excavatum: from denying the problem to finding the mechanism

Clinical Policy: Clindamycin (Cleocin) Reference Number: CP.HNMC.08 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: Medicaid - HNMC

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority

The nuss procedure for the correction of pectus excavatum

PDF # COMMON PEDIATRIC CPT CODES 2013 OWNERS MANUAL DOCUMENT

Systematic review of surgical treatment techniques for adult and pediatric patients with pectus excavatum

Investigation on the electrometric measurement experiment of the artificial thoracic model of pectus excavatum with scoliosis.

Blue Cross Blueshield Of Alabama Fee Schedule

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Procedure for Application

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)

Icd 10 procedure code for incisional drainage

The Pet Resort at Greensprings, Inc.

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority

TITLE: Antibacterial Sutures for Wound Closure after Surgery: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness and Long-Term Adverse Effects

2019 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority

WellChoice Medical Schedule of Benefits (Effective July 01, 2016) AAMC Employees and Eligible Dependents

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Quality ID #352: Total Knee Replacement: Preoperative Antibiotic Infusion with Proximal Tourniquet National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety

LYME DISEASE. Policy Number: INFECTIOUS T2 Effective Date: December 1, Related Policies None

Technical Considerations in the Surgical Management of Pectus Excavatum and Carinatum

Surgical Cross Coder. Essential links from CPT codes to ICD-9-CM and HCPCS codes

Qualifications of Exhibitor

Blue Cross Interqual Smart Sheet

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority

Prevention of Perioperative Surgical Infections

Dances With Wolves Ranch, LLC Puppy Purchase Agreement and Limited Warranty

Post mortem examinations

POLICIES. Austin Peay State University. Animals on Campus

Contract and Bill of Sale

CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION

(Whether singular or plural, hereinafter "The Purchaser")

Conflict of Interest

The Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, International.

American Association of Equine Practitioners White Paper on Telehealth July 2018

"Serpent" Sign, "Double Arch" Sign and "Air-Bubble"Sign in a case of Ruptured Hydatid Cyst-A Case Report

Animal Research Ethics Procedure

Icd 10 code for screening mrsa

Medical Revenue Code Manual Blue Cross

Measure #21 (NQF 0268): Perioperative Care: Selection of Prophylactic Antibiotic First OR Second Generation Cephalosporin

Fairfield Pet Lodge Terms & Conditions

Animal Shelter Management and Services Agreement

Dysmorphology of Chest Wall Deformities: Frequency Distribution of Subtypes of Typical Pectus Excavatum and Rare Subtypes,

First Coast No More Homeless Pets, Inc. Audit of the SpayJax Program December 8, 2003 REPORT #586

European Regional Verification Commission for Measles and Rubella Elimination (RVC) TERMS OF REFERENCE. 6 December 2011

Quality ID #66: Appropriate Testing for Children with Pharyngitis National Quality Strategy Domain: Efficiency and Cost Reduction

Pectus excavatum repair from a plastic surgeon s perspective

The OPTerm Series. Rates and Specifications

Clinical Policy: Itraconazole (Sporanox) Reference Number: CP.PPA.07. Line of Business: Medicaid

Puppy Sales Contract

Office of Residence Life Service Animal Procedure

Sample page. Primary Care/ Pediatrics/ Emergency Medicine A comprehensive illustrated guide to coding and reimbursement CODING COMPANION

Dr. Angela Huttner, FMH Division of Infectious Diseases Geneva University Hospitals 5 December

GULF COAST AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE YOUTH ORGANIZATION GCA & NRYO SPRING 2018 SHOW RECORD BOOK

BASENJI CLUB OF AMERICA RESCUE PROGRAM EFFECTIVE DATE June 11, 2007

Blue Cross Revenue Code Manual 2017 Cpt

Wildlife Rehabilitation. Wildlife Rehab, Inc Forsyth Tech, Spring 2017

Disability Support Resources (DSR) Guidelines for Assistance Animals

Authorisation of a lay person to carry out pregnancy testing of cattle by rectal palpation

Quality Improvement Case Study Don Buckingham, MBOE Senior Quality Improvement Service Line Coordinator

PROTOCOL FOR THE HUMANE CARE AND USE OF LIVE VERTEBRATE ANIMALS

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority

Measure #20 (NQF 0270): Perioperative Care: Timing of Prophylactic Parenteral Antibiotic Ordering Physician

Beef Calving Statistics (01/07/ /06/2016)

Service and Assistance Animals Policy & Procedure

Salisbury University Assistance Animal Policy

The purpose of this policy is to delineate the functions, roles and responsibilities of the FAU IACUC membership.

Referred to Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

TITLE: Recognition and Diagnosis of Sepsis in Rural or Remote Areas: A Review of Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines

Service Animal and Assistance Animal Policy. Accessibility Services. Director of Accessibility Services

Service and Support Animal Policy

Section I. Definitions

Wind River s Kennel. Koeberlein s Hunting Preserve. Debbi Koeberlein 274 County Road 1400 East Tolono, Illinois (217) CONTRACT

ASSESSMENT Theory and knowledge are tested through assignments and examinations.

Service and Assistance Animal Policy

Promoting Appropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing in Secondary Care

SECTION I. Fitchburg State: Service Animal and Assistance Animal Policy FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY SERVICE ANIMAL AND ASSISTANCE ANIMAL POLICY

Transcription:

COVERAGE DETERMINATION GUIDELINE PECTUS DEFORMITY REPAIR Guideline Number: CDG.015.01 Effective Date: October 1, 2013 Table of Contents COVERAGE RATIONALE... DEFINITIONS. APPLICABLE CODES... REFERENCES... HISTORY/REVISION INFORMATION... COVERAGE RATIONALE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE This Coverage Determination Guideline provides assistance in interpreting certain standard UnitedHealthcare benefit plans. When deciding coverage, the enrollee specific document must be referenced. The terms of an enrollee s document (e.g., Certificates of Coverage (COCs), Schedules of Benefits (SOBs), or Summary Plan Descriptions (SPDs),and Medicaid State Contracts) may differ greatly from the standard benefit plans upon which this guideline is based. In the event of a conflict, the enrollee's specific benefit document supersedes these guidelines. All reviewers must first identify enrollee eligibility, any federal or state regulatory requirements and the plan benefit coverage prior to use of this guideline. Other coverage determination guidelines and medical policies may apply. UnitedHealthcare reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to modify its coverage determination guidelines and medical policies as necessary. This Coverage Determination Guideline does not constitute medical advice. UnitedHealthcare may also use tools developed by third parties, such as the MCG Care Guidelines, to assist us in administering health benefits. The MCG Care Guidelines are intended to be used in connection with the independent professional medical judgment of a qualified health care provider and do not constitute the practice of medicine or medical advice. COVERAGE RATIONALE Plan Document Language Page 1 3 4 5 6 Related Coverage Determination Guidelines: Cosmetic and Reconstructive Procedures Before using this guideline, please check enrollee s specific plan document and any federal state mandates or state contract, if applicable. Essential Health Benefits for Individual and Small Group: For plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) requires fully insured non-grandfathered individual and small group plans (inside and outside of Exchanges) to provide coverage for ten categories of Essential Health Benefits ( EHBs ). Large group plans (both self-funded and fully insured), and small group ASO plans, are not subject to the requirement to offer coverage for EHBs. However, if such plans choose to provide coverage for benefits which are deemed EHBs (such as maternity benefits), the ACA requires all dollar limits on those benefits to be removed on all Grandfathered and Non-Grandfathered plans. The determination of which benefits constitute EHBs is made on a state by state basis. As such, when using this guideline, it is important to refer to the enrollee s specific plan document to determine benefit coverage. 1

Indications for Coverage Some states require benefit coverage for services that UnitedHealthcare considers cosmetic procedures, such as repair of external congenital anomalies in the absence of a functional impairment. Please refer to enrollee s plan specific documents. Criteria for a Coverage Determination that Surgery is Reconstructive and/or Medically Necessary: Pectus Excavatum 1. Imaging studies confirm Haller index greater than 3.25; AND 2. The functional impairment is defined by one or more of the following; i. For restrictive lung capacity the total lung capacity is documented in the physician current office notes as <80% of the predicted value; OR ii. There is a right ventricular compression. Cardiac compression is demonstrated by CT, MRI or ultrasound of the chest (Cardiac displacement without compression is not a functional impairment); OR iii. There is objective evidence of exercise intolerance as documented by: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing that is below the predicted values. OR Exercise pulmonary function tests that are below the predicted values. Additional Information: Right ventricular compression may occur; if such compression causes cardiac symptoms, such symptoms may require repair of the pectus deformity. The right ventricle is anatomically located just behind the sternum and is typically displaced to the left by a pectus excavatum Patients with pectus excavatum who have a comorbid diagnosis of asthma should have optimal treatment for their asthma so that abnormal pulmonary function studies are not incorrectly attributed to the pectus deformity. The significance of structural mitral valve abnormalities, if any, in persons with pectus excavatum, is unclear. Requests for repair of pectus excavatum for mitral valve abnormalities must be reviewed by a UnitedHealth Care medical director. Pectus Carinatum It is extremely uncommon that pectus carinatum will cause a functional/physiological deficit. Requests for coverage of repair of pectus carinatum will be reviewed by a UHC Medical Director on a case by case basis 2

Coverage Limitations and Exclusions Some states require benefit coverage for services that UnitedHealthcare considers cosmetic procedures, such as repair of external congenital anomalies in the absence of a functional/ physical impairment. Please refer to enrollee s plan specific documents. 1. Cosmetic Procedures are excluded from coverage. Procedures that correct an anatomical Congenital Anomaly without improving or restoring physiologic function are considered Cosmetic Procedures. The fact that a Covered Person may suffer functional/psychological consequences or socially avoidant behavior as a result of an Injury, Sickness or Congenital Anomaly does not classify surgery (or other procedures done to relieve such consequences or behavior) as a reconstructive procedure. 2. Any procedure that does not meet the reconstructive criteria above in the Indications for Coverage section For ASO plans with SPD language other than fully-insured Generic COC language Please refer to the enrollee s plan specific SPD for coverage. DEFINITIONS Congenital Anomaly: a physical developmental defect that is present at birth, and is identified within the first twelve months of birth. (2001 FI Generic COC) A physical developmental defect that is present at the time of birth, and that is identified within the first twelve months of birth. (2007 through 2011 Generic COC) Congenital Anomaly (California Only): a physical developmental defect that is present at birth Cosmetic Procedures: Cosmetic Procedures are excluded from coverage. Procedures that correct an anatomical Congenital Anomaly without improving or restoring physiologic function are considered Cosmetic Procedures. The fact that a Covered Person may suffer psychological consequences or socially avoidant behavior as a result of an Injury, Sickness or Congenital Anomaly does not classify surgery or other procedures done to relieve such consequences or behavior as a reconstructive procedure. (2001 FI Generic COC) Procedures or services that change or improve appearance without significantly improving physiological function, as determined by UHC (2007 through 2011 Generic COC). Cosmetic Procedures (California Only): procedures or services are performed to alter or reshape normal structures of the body in order to improve the Covered Person's appearance Functional/Physical Impairment: A physical/functional or physiological impairment causes deviation from the normal function of a tissue or organ. This results in a significantly limited, impaired, or delayed capacity to move, coordinate actions, or perform physical activities and is exhibited by difficulties in one or more of the following areas: physical and motor tasks; independent movement; performing basic life functions Haller Index: The Haller index, or pectus severity index, is the most commonly used scale for determining the severity of chest wall deformities. Computerized tomography (CT) is used to determine the index, which is obtained by dividing the inner width of the chest at its widest point by the distance between the posterior surface of the sternum and the anterior surface of the spine. This measurement uses the deepest level of the inner sternal depression to the anterior aspect of the vertebral body. A normal chest has a Haller index of about 2.5 3

Pectus Carinatum: Pigeon breast is another chest wall deformity characterized by an anterior protrusion of the sternum and costal cartilages. This deformity often produces a rigid chest. Pectus Excavatum: Funnel chest, is a congenital abnormality of the chest wall in which deformed cartilages result in a concavity of the sternum Reconstructive Procedures Surgery or other procedures which are associated with an Injury, Sickness or Congenital Anomaly, performed when a physical impairment exists and when the primary purpose of the procedure is to improve or restore physiologic functions. The fact that physical appearance may change or improve as a result of a reconstructive procedure does not classify such surgery as a Cosmetic Procedure when a physical impairment exists, and the surgery restores or improves function. (2001 Generic COC) Reconstructive procedures when the primary purpose of the procedure is either to treat a medical condition or to improve or restore physiologic function. Reconstructive procedures include surgery or other procedures which are associated with an Injury, Sickness or Congenital Anomaly. The primary result of the procedure is not a changed or improved physical appearance. Procedures that correct an anatomical Congenital Anomaly without improving or restoring physiologic function are considered Cosmetic Procedures. The fact that a Covered Person may suffer psychological consequences or socially avoidant behavior as a result of an Injury, Sickness or Congenital Anomaly does not classify surgery (or other procedures done to relieve such consequences or behavior) as a reconstructive procedure. (2007-2011 Generic COC) Reconstructive Procedures (California Only): Reconstructive procedures to correct or repair abnormal structures of the body caused by congenital defects, developmental abnormalities, trauma, infection, tumors, or disease. Reconstructive procedures include surgery or other procedures which are associated with an Injury, Sickness or Congenital Anomaly. The primary result of the procedure is not a changed or improved physical appearance for cosmetic purposes only, but rather to improve function and/or to create a normal appearance, to the extent possible. Sickness - physical illness, disease or Pregnancy. The term Sickness as used in this Certificate does not include mental illness or substance abuse, regardless of the cause or origin of the mental illness or substance abuse. APPLICABLE CODES The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT ) codes and HCPCS codes listed in this guideline are for reference purposes only. Listing of a service code in this guideline does not imply that the service described by this code is a covered or non-covered health service. Coverage is determined by the enrollee specific benefit document and applicable laws that may require coverage for a specific service. The inclusion of a code does not imply any right to reimbursement or guarantee claims payment. Other policies and coverage determination guidelines may apply. CPT is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association. Limited to specific procedure codes? CPT Procedure Code Description 21740 Reconstructive repair of pectus excavatum or carinatum; open 21742 Reconstructive repair of pectus excavatum or carinatum; minimally invasive approach (nuss procedure), without thoracoscopy 21743 Reconstructive repair of pectus excavatum or carinatum; minimally invasive approach (nuss procedure), with thoracoscopy 4

Limited to specific diagnosis codes? ICD-9 Diagnosis Code 754.81 Pectus excavatum 754.82 Pectus carinatum Description ICD-10 Codes (Preview Draft) In preparation for the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 medical coding on October 1, 2014 *, a sample listing of the ICD-10 CM and/or ICD-10 PCS codes associated with this policy has been provided below for your reference. This list of codes may not be all inclusive and will be updated to reflect any applicable revisions to the ICD-10 code set and/or clinical guidelines outlined in this policy. *The effective date for ICD-10 code set implementation is subject to change. ICD-10 Diagnosis Code Q67.6 Pectus excavatum Q67.7 Pectus carinatum Description Limited to place of service (POS)? Limited to specific provider type? Limited to specific revenue codes? REFERENCES 1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) available @: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/ 2. Boehm RA, Muensterer OJ, Till H. Comparing minimally invasive funnel chest repair versus the conventional technique: an outcome analysis in children. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Sep 1;114(3):668-73; discussion 674-5. 3. Coln E, Carrasco J, Coln D. Demonstrating relief of cardiac compression with the Nuss minimally invasive repair for pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Apr;41(4):683-6; discussion 683-6. 4. Croitoru DP, Kelly RE Jr, Goretsky MJ, et al. Experience and modification update for the minimally invasive Nuss technique for pectus excavatum repair in 303 patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Mar;37(3):437-45. 5. Fonkalsrud EW, Beanes S, Hebra A, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive and modified Ravitch pectus excavatum repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2002; 37(3): 413-7 6. Goretsky M, Kelly R, Croitoru D, et al. Chest wall anomalies: pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum. Adolescent Med Clinic. 2004 Oct;15(3):455-71. 7. Jacobs, Jeffrey P. Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Repair Of Pectus Excavatum. CTS Net. Dec 1, 2003. Last updated February 13, 2008. 8. Kliegman: Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 18th ed. Chapter 416. 2007 9. Lawson ML, Mellins RB, Tabangin M, et al. Impact of pectus excavatum on pulmonary function before and after repair with the Nuss procedure. J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jan;40(1):174-80. 10. Malek MH, Berger DE, Housh TJ, et al. Cardiovascular function following surgical repair of pectus excavatum: a metaanalysis. Chest. 2006 Aug;130(2):506-16. 11. McGuigan RM, Azarow KS. Congenital chest wall defects. Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Apr;86(2):353-70, ix. 5

12. Molik KA, Engum SA, Rescorla FJ, et al. Pectus Excavatum Repair: Experience With Standard and Minimal Invasive Techniques. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2001;36(2):324-328. 13. Nuss D. Recent experiences with minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair "Nuss procedure". Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jul;53(7):338-44. 14. Schalamon J, et al. Minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum in adult patients. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, September 2006. 132(3):524-29 15. Townsend: Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 18th ed. 16. MDConsult. 2009. Wu PC, Knauer EM, McGowan GE, et al. Repair of Pectus Excavatum Deformities in Children. Arch Surg. 2001;136:419-424. 17. Jaroszewksi, D., Notrica, D., McMahon, L., Steidely, D. E., Deschamps, C. (2010). Current Management of Pectus Excavatum. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. March-April 2010. 23(2), 230-239. GUIDELINE HISTORY/REVISION INFORMATION Date Action/Description 12/01/2010 Original Effective Date. 05/01/2011 New guideline effective 06/01/11 05/05/2011 Added definition of Haller Index 09/01/2011 Updated footer. Updated Reconstructive Procedures definition 10/01/2011 Revision to California Only Statement pg. 3 11/01/2011 Modified California definition for Reconstructive Procedures. 10/01/2012 Annual Review: Added paragraph to instructions for use; Revised paragraph for Documentation Section I; added All required documentation must be submitted and approved through the standard process bottom of documentation and updated footer date. Added ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes. New Template Updated applicable products on page 1. 10/01/2013 Removed documentation requirements. Updated Instructions for Use. Under #2 iii added the following. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing that is below the predicted values. OR Exercise pulmonary function tests that are below the predicted values. Added #17 in references. 11/01/2013 Plan Document Language section: Added Essential Health Benefits paragraph. 04/11/2014 Reformatted table of contents (no change to policy content/coverage determination guidelines): o Added new policy guideline number assignment for document archive management purposes; guideline number previously listed as CDG-A-030 6

o Removed applicable products grid (Note: Policy document no longer applies to Community Plan membership; Community Plan specific policy documents now available) 7