DG SANTE update: 1. New R 2017/625_ EURLs/NRLs 2. New Campylobacter PHC

Similar documents
Campylobacter control in the food chain. EU proposals on the revision of the hygiene inspection of poultry

The European Union Reference Laboratories network

Official controls on products of animal origin: Art. 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625

Official Journal of the European Union L 162/3

in food safety Jean-Luc ANGOT CVO France

Official Journal of the European Union L 280/5

Zoonoses in the EU and global context

2010 EU Summary Report on Zoonoses: overview on Campylobacter

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter EURL AR activities in framework of the new EU regulation Lina Cavaco

The EFSA s BIOHAZ Panel perspective on food microbiology and hygiene

EN SANCO/745/2008r6 EN EN

EU animal health system Prevention, Surveillance, Control and Eradication

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition. P8_TA-PROV(2018)0429 Animal welfare, antimicrobial use and the environmental impact of industrial broiler farming

REGULATION (EC) No 854/2004 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

Ambassade de France en Chine. The French Food Safety System

Veterinary antimicrobials: state of play and future developments 2013 European Medicines Agency/IFAH- Europe Info Day 7-8 March 2013

EU strategy to fight against Antimicrobial Resistance

OIE Standards for: Animal identification and traceability Antimicrobials

EFSA s activities on Antimicrobial resistance in the food chain. Dr. Ernesto Liebana Head of BIOCONTAM Unit. EFSA

EFSA s activities on Antimicrobial Resistance

The Commission activities on AMR (focus on zoonotic issues)

DG Health and Food Safety. Interim Overview report. Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring in Zoonotic and Commensal Bacteria. Health and Food Safety

Conference on meat inspection

EU Action Plan to combat the rising threats from Antimicrobial Resistance: State of play

Specific Rules for Animal Product

OIE Tool for the Evaluation of Performance of Veterinary Services (OIE PVS Tool)

The Integration of WTO Agreements into National Legislation: Case of the SPS Agreement

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

OIE Standards on Veterinary Legislation: Chapter 3.4 of the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code

OIE STANDARDS ON VETERINARY SERVICES ( ), COMMUNICATION (3.3), & LEGISLATION (3.4)

Global capacity for sustainable surveillance of emerging zoonoses

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

BEST PRACTICE POLICY ON ANTIBIOTICS STEWARDSHIP

Ministry of Health. Transport of animals Pratical Experience Member Country perspective

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 152(4)(b) thereof,

Presentation of ANSES

Campylobacter infections in EU/EEA and related AMR

ESTONIA TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

DG(SANCO)/ MR

GOOD GOVERNANCE OF VETERINARY SERVICES AND THE OIE PVS PATHWAY

Campylobacter species

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/ 99/ EC

EFSA s activities on antimicrobial resistance in the food chain: risk assessment, data collection and risk communication.

Update on European Agencies activities in the field of AMR

LIFE.2.B EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 14 November 2018 (OR. en) 2014/0255 (COD) PE-CONS 43/18 AGRILEG 102 VETER 52 CODEC 1149

International movement of pet animals

Recognition of Export Controls and Certification Systems for Animals and Animal Products. Guidance for Competent Authorities of Exporting Countries

AMR a joint effort. Prof. Alfred Hera HMA/EMEA co-ordination meeting Marienbad May 2009

1.1. Project Number: Project 02 of the 2002 National Pre-accession Programme for Malta Title: Veterinary Controls Animal Health / Public Health

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Transmitted by Co-Chairs of the Informal Working Party On Periodical Technical Inspections. WP (08-11 March 2016, agenda item 7.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

NATIONAL REFERENCE LABORATORY FOR Escherichia coli (VTEC) ROMANIA

Competent Authority response to the report recommendations received on 24 August 2016

OIE Regional Commission for Europe Regional Work Plan Framework Version adopted during the 85 th OIE General Session (Paris, May 2017)

The Regulation of medical devices in the European Union

Standard requirement for the submission of programme for eradication, control and monitoring

OIE Conference on Veterinary Medicinal Products in the Middle East

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

EU Programmes for Animal Welfare in the European region

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Trends and sources of Campylobacter in the EU, covered by EFSA s Community zoonoses summary report

NATIONAL SANITARY VETERINARY AND FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY BUCHAREST, ROMANIA

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

OIE standards on the use of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance monitoring

Prevention and control of Campylobacter in the poultry production system

Dr. Gérard Moulin AFSSA/ANMV OIE Collaborating Centre on Veterinary medicinal products BP FOUGERES CEDEX, FRANCE

A global vision for antimicrobial stewardship in food animals: Preserving antimicrobial effectiveness in the future trough ethical practices today.

Effect of EU zoonosis and other legislation on European poultry meat production

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Mission of the Community Veterinary Emergency Team to Serbia

(Text with EEA relevance)

Stuart Slorach Chair, OIE Working Group on Animal Production Food Safety. Cooperation between the OIE and Codex: OIE perspective

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

OIE Tool for the Evaluation of Performance of Veterinary Services (OIE PVS Tool)

THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK BASED MEAT INSPECTION SYSTEM SANCO / 4403 / 2000

LIVE ANIMAL TRANSPORT

The PVS Tool. Part 4. Introduction to the concept of Fundamental Components and Critical Competencies

EUROPEAN REFERENCE LABORATORY (EU-RL) FOR BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS WORK-PROGRAMME PROPOSAL Version 2 VISAVET. Universidad Complutense de Madrid

ANNEX. to the COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

OIE standards on the Quality of Veterinary Services

Antimicrobial resistance in food safety perspective - current situation in Croatia

Overview of ongoing EFSA work on the meat inspection mandate

UK National Control Programme for Salmonella in chickens (Gallus gallus) reared for meat (Broilers)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

and suitability aspects of food control. CAC and the OIE have Food safety is an issue of increasing concern world wide and

EUROPEAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT TRADES UNION UECBV

Recommendations of the 3 rd OIE Global Conference on Animal Welfare

OIE capacity-building activities

OIE standards : procedures, model certificates

The OIE judgement of equivalence

Walid Alali Assistant Professor, Food Safety Epidemiology

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

CHAPTER 3.3. VETERINARY LEGISLATION

Recommendations for a Practical Control Programme for Campylobacter in the Poultry Production and Slaughter Chain

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE QUALITY OF VETERINARY SERVICES

Transcription:

DG SANTE update: 1. New R 2017/625_ EURLs/NRLs 2. New Campylobacter PHC 1 2 th w o r k sh op o f t h e EU R L C a m p y lo b a ct e r 14-1 5 S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 7 Nantes Pamina M. Suzuki Unit G4 - Food hygiene Directorate G - Crisis management in food, animals and plants DG Health and Food Safety (DG SANTE) 1

The new Official Control Regulation (EU) 2017/625 (OCR) Published in the Official Journal on 7 April 2017 Replaces Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 (and R 854/2004) Framework legislation on all controls by competent authorities including official sampling and analyses and requirements for official laboratories, NRLS and EURL To be completed by 34 delegated acts and 51 implementing acts 2

Structure of the OCR

Scope of the OCR (Art. 1.2) Food and food safety Feed and feed safety GMOs Animal health Animal welfare Animal byproducts Plant health Plant protection products Organic production PDOs, PGIs, TSGs

Provisions on EURLs and NRLs Title III (Art. 92-101) - Reference laboratories Key principles: Broader scope (Plant Health) Transparency and efficiency - Decision and designation of EURLs - More specific and more precise requirements, responsibilities and tasks Accountability - Distribution of responsibilities among COM, MS, EURLs and NRLs 5

Building-up the legislative framework Step 1- Decision to establish a EURL official controls depend on the quality, uniformity and reliability of methods and results need to promote uniform practices in relation to the development or use of the methods Step 2- Designation of EURL Public selection process Limited in time, with minimum period of 5 years or reviewed regularly Accredited according to ISO/IEC 17025 (operating, methods of laboratory analysis and others and in a flexible manner) 6

EURLs Requirements Staff: 882 - Impartial, confidentiality - Suitably, training + support - International Standards - Updated Infrastructure, equipment + products - According to needs - Emergency situations OCR Equipped to comply with relevant biosecurity standards 7

Responsibilities and tasks of EURLs 882 Improvement + harmonization of tests develop annual/multiannual WP Scientific + technical assistance COM + NRLs (incl. training courses) assist during outbreaks OCR publish list of NRLs provide reference materials (if in WP) more specific: proficiency tests, followup & inform COM + MS cooperate to develop new methods collaborate with Third Countries, with EFSA, EMA and ECDC 8

Designation of NRLs 882 MSs to designate > 1 NRLs for each EURL MS may designate lab in another MS/ 3 rd Country NRL may be designated > 1 MS OCR MS may designate a NRL even if no EURL Official communication to COM, EURL + MS and public information of the name and address 9

882 NRLs Requirements OCR Staff: - Impartial, confidentiality - Suitably and training + support - International Standards Infrastructure, equipment and products - According to needs - Emergency situations Scope of accreditation Equipped with relevant biosecurity standards CA shall organise audits Withdraw the designation if doesn't comply with: - ISO 17025 - Obligations - Expected results in proficiency tests 10

Responsibilities and tasks of NRLs 882 Methods of analysis + tests to official labs (OL) ensure dissemination to CA + OLs of info provided by EURL Scientific + technical assistance to CA for Multi Annual National Control Plan (MANCP) OCR Inform CA proficiency tests results and follow-up Conduct training courses for OLs Reference materials* Validate establish + maintain updated lists reference materials + manufacturers Assist CA in outbreaks 11

Obligations of Official Laboratories (OL) Title II, Chapter IV, Article 38 - Inform immediately CA if results indicate risk to human, animal or plant health, or as regards GMOs and plant protection products, also to the environment or point to the likelihood of non-compliance - Upon request by: EURL or NRL OL shall take part in proficiency tests. Competent Authorities: OL shall make available to the public methods used for analyses performed official controls OL shall indicate the results together with the method used for each 12 analysis

Obligations of the MS 882 designate NRLs OCR ensure coordination between NRLs work closely together communicate details of NRLs to COM, EURLs and other MS Update and make available to public details NRLs (name and address) 13

2017 J F March April M J J A S O N D April 2017 2018 ADOPTION Timeline for EURLs 1 year ENTRY INTO FORCE APPLICATION DATE 14

2. The new Campylobacter Process Hygiene Criterion (PHC) on broiler meat 15

Content Background Campylobacter process hygiene criterion 2.1.9 Sampling rules for Salmonella & Campylobacter Testing in the SAME lab Testing in DIFFERENT labs Campylobacter PHC - Sampling frequencies 16

Background high public health relevance of Campylobacter: most frequently reported foodborne pathogen in the EU broiler meat identified as the main cause of campylobacteriosis cases (2010 EFSA opinion) 2012 EFSA opinion suggests the introduction of a PHC for Campylobacter on broiler carcases: o if broiler meat <1000 cfu/g 50% public health risk reduction Setting PHC at slaughterhouse: best cost-effective control option (Cost-benefit analysis) 17

The 50 samples shall be derived from 10 consecutive sampling sessions in accordance with the sampling rules and frequencies laid down in this Regulation Interpretation of the test results - Campylobacter spp. in poultry carcases of broilers: satisfactory, if a maximum of c/n values are > m, unsatisfactory, if more than c/n values are > m. ; 18

Sampling rules for Campylobacter & Salmonella testing in the SAME LAB 1. Neck skins from a minimum of 15 poultry carcases shall be sampled at random after chilling during each sampling session. 2. Before examination, the neck skin samples from at least three poultry carcases from the same flock of origin shall be pooled into one sample of 26 g. Thus, the neck skin samples form 5 26 g final samples (26 g are needed to perform analyses for Salmonella and Campylobacter from one sample in parallel). 3. The samples shall be kept after sampling and transported to the laboratory at a temperature not lower than 1 C and not higher than 8 C and the time between the sampling and the testing for Campylobacter shall be of less than 48 hours in order to ensure maintenance of sample integrity. Samples that have reached a temperature of 0 C shall not be used to verify compliance with the Campylobacter criterion. 19

Sampling rules for Campylobacter & Salmonella testing in the SAME LAB 3. The 5 26 g samples shall be used to verify the compliance with process hygiene criteria set out in Row 2.1.5 and Row 2.1.9 of Chapter 2 and the food safety criterion set out in Row 1.28 of Chapter 1. 4. In order to prepare the initial suspension at the laboratory, the 26 g test portion shall be transferred to nine volumes (234 ml) buffered peptone water (BPW). The BPW shall be brought to room temperature before adding. The mixture shall be treated in a stomacher or pulsifier for approximately one minute. Foaming shall be avoided by removing the air from the stomacher bag as much as possible. 10 ml (~ 1 g) of this initial suspension shall be transferred to an empty sterile tube and 1 ml of the 10 ml shall be used for the enumeration of Campylobacter on selective plates. The rest of the initial suspension (250 ml ~ 25 g) shall be used for the detection of Salmonella. 20

Campy & Salmonella Testing in SAME LAB e.g. 15 carcases after chilling (26 g) (26 g) (26 g) (26 g) (26 g) 5 final samples of 26 g Salmonella & Campylobacter 21

Sampling rules for Campylobacter & Salmonella testing in LABS 1. Neck skins from a minimum of 20 poultry carcases shall be sampled at random after chilling during each sampling session. 2. Before examination, the neck skin samples from at least four poultry carcases from the same flock of origin shall be pooled into one sample of 35 g. 3. Thus, the neck skin samples form 5 35 g samples, which in turn shall be split in order to obtain 5 25 g final samples (to be tested for Salmonella) and 5 10 g final samples (to be tested for Campylobacter). 22

Sampling rules for Campylobacter & Salmonella testing in the SAME LAB 4. The samples shall be kept after sampling and transported to the laboratory at a temperature not lower than 1 C and not higher than 8 C and the time between the sampling and the testing for Campylobacter shall be of less than 48 hours in order to ensure maintenance of sample integrity. Samples that have reached a temperature of 0 C shall not be used to verify compliance with the Campylobacter criterion. 5. The 5 25 g samples shall be used to verify the compliance with process hygiene criteria set out in Row 2.1.5 of Chapter 2 and the food safety criterion set out in Row 1.28 of Chapter 1. The 5 10 g samples shall be used to verify the compliance with the process hygiene criterion set out in Row 2.1.9 of Chapter 2. 23

25 g Campy & Salmonella Testing in LABS 10 g 25 g 10 g 25 g 10 g 25 g 10 g 25 g 10 g e.g. 20 carcases after chilling (35 g) (35 g) (35 g) (35 g) (35 g) 24

25 g Campy & Salmonella Testing in LABS 10 g 25 g 10 g 25 g 10 g 25 g 10 g 25 g 10 g e.g. 20 carcases after chilling (10g neck skin each) (35 g) (35 g) (35 g) (35 g) (35 g) 5 final samples of 25 g Salmonella testing 5 final samples of 10 g 25 Campylobacter testing

Campy PHC - Sampling frequencies Weekly The frequency may be reduced: to fortnightly IF satisfactory results have been obtained for 52 consecutive weeks IF national/regional control programmes for Campylobacter in place The sampling frequency may be further reduced IF low contamination level of Campylobacter is reached over a 52-week period in the farms of origin of the broilers purchased by the slaughterhouse. In case the control programme shows satisfactory results during a specific period of the year, frequency of analysis of Campylobacter may also be adjusted to seasonal variations after authorisation by the competent authority. 26

Thank you! Questions?! 27