Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

Similar documents
January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

This document is protected by international copyright laws.

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

What s new in EUCAST methods?

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Performance Information. Vet use only

The Very Latest from the CLSI AST Subcommittee.

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

The β- Lactam Antibiotics. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The University of Jordan November 2018

21 st Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines Peer Review Report Antibiotics Review

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 8)

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

Background and Plan of Analysis

Update on the CLSI Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: What s New with the Gram Positive Organisms?

SMART WORKFLOW SOLUTIONS Introducing DxM MicroScan WalkAway System* ...

SAMPLE VET08. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals.

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

National Clinical Guideline Centre Pneumonia Diagnosis and management of community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Antimicrobial susceptibility

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

Version 1.01 (01/10/2016)

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

1. The preferred treatment option for an initial UTI episode in a 22-year-old female patient

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory

Detecting / Reporting Resistance in Nonfastidious GNR Part #2. Janet A. Hindler, MCLS MT(ASCP)

QUICK REFERENCE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.)

Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR)

Evaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test System

BACTERIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY REPORT: 2016 (January 2016 December 2016)

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) CHRISTUS SETX

2 0 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr. 8 hr. 10 hr. 12 hr.14 hr. 16 hr. 18 hr. 20 hr. 22 hr. 24 hr. (time)

Antibiotic Updates: Part II

Interpreting Microbiology reports for better Clinical Decisions Interpreting Antibiogrammes

EUCAST-and CLSI potency NEO-SENSITABS

C&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 2013 December 2015

Available online at ISSN No:

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Summary 2011

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(11):

Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in the Province of British Columbia

BactiReg3 Event Notes Module Page(s) 4-9 (TUL) Page 1 of 21

Penicillins - EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints (version 1.3)

STAPHYLOCOCCI: KEY AST CHALLENGES

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Urine - Gram Positive Susceptibility Reporting 1 Staphylococcus species, MRSA...11

SEA-HLM-415 Distribution: General. Establishment of national laboratory-based surveillance of antimicrobial resistance

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

EAGAR Importance Rating and Summary of Antibiotic Uses in Humans in Australia

Antimicrobial Update. Alison MacDonald Area Antimicrobial Pharmacist NHS Highland April 2018

AMR Industry Alliance Antibiotic Discharge Targets

Chemotherapy of bacterial infections. Part II. Mechanisms of Resistance. evolution of antimicrobial resistance

Leveraging the Lab and Microbiology Department to Optimize Stewardship

Streptococcus pneumoniae. Oxacillin 1 µg as screen for beta-lactam resistance

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Summary 2012

5/4/2018. Multidrug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) Objectives. Outline. Define a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO)

Brief reports. Heat stability of the antimicrobial activity of sixty-two antibacterial agents

Main objectives of the EURL EQAS s

Medicinal Chemistry 561P. 2 st hour Examination. May 6, 2013 NAME: KEY. Good Luck!

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Interactive session: adapting to antibiogram. Thong Phe Heng Vengchhun Felix Leclerc Erika Vlieghe

Antibiotic Abyss. Discussion Points. MRSA Treatment Guidelines

HUSRES Annual Report 2007 Martti Vaara.

2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report

Transcription:

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics Susan E. Sharp, Ph.D., DABMM, FAAM Director, Airport Way Regional Laboratory Director, Regional Microbiology and Molecular Infectious Diseases Laboratories Kaiser Permanente, Department of Pathology Portland, OR Romney Humphries, Ph.D., DABMM Section Chief, Clinical Microbiology University of California Los Angeles Lost Angeles, CA

Objectives Discuss the basic components of the CLSI M100 S24 document, including Tables 1A and 1B (antimicrobials suggested for routine testing and reporting) and Tables 2 (interpretive criteria). Review key susceptibility testing issues for commonly encountered, clinically relevant organisms, including Staphylococcus, the Enterococcus, Streptococcus pneumoniae Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the Nonfermenting GNRs. Examine quality control issues commonly encountered by the clinical laboratory, and define how to resolve these. Review M45 guideline on susceptibility testing for fastidious or infrequently encountered bacteria.

Basic Components Discuss the basic components of the CLSI M100 S24 document Tables 1A & 1B (antimicrobials suggested for routine testing and reporting) Tables 2 (interpretive criteria) Other tables and guidance

CLSI AST Standards January 2014 M100-S24 Tables (2014)* M02-A11 Disk Diffusion Method (2012)^ M07-A9 MIC Method (2012)^ * M100 updated every year ^ M02, M07 updated every 3 years 4

Summary of Major Changes Changes to CLSI documents are summarized in the front of each document. Recent breakpoint addition/revision with dates are listed in the front of M100 document. Information listed in boldface type throughout is new or modified since the previous edition of M100 document. 5

M100: Instructions for Use of Tables I. Selecting Antimicrobial Agents for Testing and Reporting II. Reporting Results III. Therapy-Related Comments IV. Confirmation of Patients Results V. Development of Resistance and Testing of Repeat Isolates VI. Warning VII. Screening Tests VIII. QC and Verification IX. Abbreviations and Acronyms

I. Selecting Antimicrobial Agents for Testing and Reporting Tables 1A & 1B These tables contain suggested groupings of antibiotics that should be considered for routine testing and reporting by clinical microbiology laboratories. The guidelines are based on drugs with clinical indications approved by the FDA.

Tables 1 Table 1A Enterobacteriaceae P.aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp Enterococcus spp Acinetobacter spp Burkholderia cepacia Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Other Nonenterobacteriaceae Table 1B Haemophilus influenzae and H. parainfluenzae Neisseria gonorrhoeae Streptococus pneumoniae Streptococcus spp, b- hemolytic Group Streptococcus spp, Viridans Group

Tables 2A through 2I For each organism group, an additional tables contain: Recommended testing conditions Routine QC recommendations General comments for testing Suggested agents that should be considered for routine testing and reporting Additional drugs that have an approved indication Zone diameters and MIC interpretative criteria

Other tables Tables 1C and 2J Address specific recommendations for testing and reporting results on anaerobes Tables 3: A through I Describe screening tests for other tests to detect particular types of resistance

Table 1A These tables contain suggested groupings of antibiotics that should be considered for routine testing and reporting by clinical microbiology laboratories.

GROUP U SUPPLEMENTAL FOR URINE ONLY GROUP C SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT SELECTIVELY GROUP B PRIMARY TEST REPORT SELECTIVELY GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Table 1A. Suggested Groupings of Antimicrobial Agents With FDA Clinical Indications That Should Be Considered for Routine Testing and Reporting on Nonfastidious Organisms by Clinical Microbiology Laboratories in the United States Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Ampicillin n Penicillin o Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Amikacin Amikacin Ceftaroline h *Daptomycin j *Daptomycin j Aztreonam Linezolid Linezolid Amoxicillin-clavulanate Ampicillin-sulbactam Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate Cefuroxime Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Cefepime Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Doxycycline Minocycline b Tetracycline a Vancomycin Cefepime Cefotetan Cefoxitin Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin Doripenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin *, Vancomycin Rifampin g Cefotaxime d,e or ceftriaxone d,e Ciprofloxacin d Levofloxacin d Doripenem Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillin Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole d Aztreonam Ceftazidime Ceftaroline Chloramphenicol b,d Tetracycline a Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Enterococcus spp. m Chloramphenicol b Gentamicin (high-level resistance screen only) Ciprofloxacin or Streptomycin levofloxacin or (high-level ofloxacin resistance screen only) Moxifloxacin Gentamicin l Cefazolin c (surrogate test for uncomplicated UTI) Lomefloxacin or ofloxacin Lomefloxacin or ofloxacin Norfloxacin Lomefloxacin Norfloxacin Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin Norfloxacin Norfloxacin Nitrofurantoin Nitrofurantoin Nitrofurantoin Sulfisoxazole Sulfisoxazole Trimethoprim Trimethoprim Tetracycline a

I. Selecting Antimicrobial Agents for Testing and Reporting Should be a decision made at each individual laboratory in consultation with infectious diseases practitioners, pharmacy, P&T, etc. Recommendations for each group include agents of proven efficacy that show acceptable in vitro test performance Considerations for inclusion of agents into the Table include clinical efficacy, prevalence of R, minimizing emergence of R, cost, FDA indications, current consensus for first-choice and alternative drugs.

Tables 1A & 1B Drugs listed together in a single box are agents for which interpretive results (SIR) and clinical efficacy are similar. Within each box an OR between agents indicates those agents for which cross-r and cross-s are nearly complete. Can be used to predict the results of the other EX: Enterobactericacae: ceftriaxone & cefotaxime When there is no OR connecting agents within a box, testing of one agent can not be used to predict results of the other

Tables 1A & 1B Test/Report Groups Group A: Primary Test and Report Considered appropriate for inclusion in a routine, primary testing panel, as well as for routine reporting of results for the specific organism group.

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o d. WARNING: For Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., first- and second-generation cephalosporins and cephamycins may appear active in vitro, but are not effective clinically and should not be reported as susceptible. When fecal isolates of Salmonella and Shigella spp. are tested, only ampicillin, a fluoroquinolone, and trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole should be reported routinely. In addition, for extraintestinal isolates of Salmonella spp., a third-generation cephalosporin should be tested and reported, and chloramphenicol may be tested and reported, if requested. Susceptibility testing is indicated for typhoidal Salmonella (S. Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A C) isolated from extraintestinal and intestinal sources. Routine susceptibility testing is not indicated for nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. isolated from intestinal sources. e. Cefotaxime or ceftriaxone should be tested and reported on isolates from CSF in place of cefazolin.

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o b. Not routinely reported on organisms isolated from the urinary tract. * MIC testing only; disk diffusion test unreliable. See oxacillin, cefoxitin, and vancomycin comments in Table 2C for using cefoxitin as a surrogate for oxacillin.

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o i. Penicillin-susceptible staphylococci are also susceptible to other -lactam agents with established clinical efficacy for staphylococcal infections. Penicillin-resistant staphylococci are resistant to penicillinase-labile penicillins. Oxacillin-resistant staphylococci are resistant to all currently available - lactam antimicrobial agents, with the exception of the newer cephalosporins with anti-mrsa activity. Thus, susceptibility or resistance to a wide array of -lactam antimicrobial agents may be deduced from testing only penicillin and either cefoxitin or oxacillin. Routine testing of other -lactam agents, except those with anti-mrsa activity, is not advised.

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o k. The results of either cefoxitin disk diffusion or cefoxitin MIC tests can be used to predict the presence of meca-mediated oxacillin resistance in S. aureus and S. lugdunensis. For coagulase-negative staphylococci (except S. lugdunensis), the cefoxitin disk diffusion test is the preferred method for detection of meca-mediated oxacillin resistance. Cefoxitin is used as a surrogate for detection of oxacillin resistance; report oxacillin as susceptible or resistant based on cefoxitin results. If a penicillinase-stable penicillin is tested, oxacillin is the preferred agent, and results can be applied to the other penicillinasestable penicillins, cloxacillin, dicloxacillin, flucloxacillin, methicillin, and nafcillin.

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o m. Warning: For Enterococcus spp., cephalosporins, aminoglycosides (except for high-level resistance screening), clindamycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole may appear active in vitro, but are not effective clinically and should not be reported as susceptible. n. The results of ampicillin susceptibility tests should be used to predict the activity of amoxicillin. Ampicillin results may be used to predict susceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin, and piperacillin-tazobactam among non -lactamase-producing enterococci. Ampicillin susceptibility can be used to predict imipenem susceptibility, providing the species is confirmed to be E. faecalis.

GROUP A PRIMARY TEST AND REPORT Tables 1A: Group A Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus spp. Ampicillin d Ceftazidime Azithromycin b or clarithromycin b or erythromycin b Cefazolin e Gentamicin Tobramycin Gentamicin Tobramycin Piperacillin Clindamycin b *, Oxacillin i,k Cefoxitin i,k (surrogate test for oxacillin) Penicillin i Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Enterococcus spp. m Ampicillin n Penicillin o o. Enterococci susceptible to penicillin are predictably susceptible to ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillinsulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin, and piperacillin-tazobactam for non -lactamase producing enterococci. However, enterococci susceptible to ampicillin cannot be assumed to be susceptible to penicillin. If penicillin results are needed, testing of penicillin is required. Rx: Combination therapy with ampicillin, penicillin, or vancomycin (for susceptible strains) plus an aminoglycoside is usually indicated for serious enterococcal infections, such as endocarditis, unless high-level resistance to both gentamicin and streptomycin is documented; such combinations are predicted to result in synergistic killing of the Enterococcus.

Group B: Primary Test, Report Selectively Include drugs that may warrant primary testing but they may be reported only selectively, such as when the organism is resistant to agents of the same class in Group A. For selected specimen sources 3 rd gen cephalosporin for enterics in CSF, or SXT for UTI Polymicrobic infections Multiple site infections Tables 1A & 1B Test/Report Groups Pt allergy, intolerance, failure Infection Control purposes (MRSA, VRE, etc.)

GROUP B PRIMARY TEST REPORT SELECTIVELY Tables 1A: Group B Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Enterococcus Enterobacteriaceae aeruginosa spp. spp. m Amikacin Amikacin Ceftaroline h *Daptomycin j *Daptomycin j Aztreonam Linezolid Linezolid Amoxicillin-clavulanate Ampicillin-sulbactam Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate Cefuroxime Cefepime Doxycycline Minocycline b Tetracycline a Vancomycin Cefepime Cefotetan Cefoxitin Cefotaxime d,e or ceftriaxone d,e Ciprofloxacin d Levofloxacin d Doripenem Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole d Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin Doripenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillintazobactam Ticarcillin *, Vancomycin Rifampin g

GROUP B PRIMARY TEST REPORT SELECTIVELY Tables 1A: Group B Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Enterococcus Enterobacteriaceae aeruginosa spp. spp. m Amikacin Amikacin Ceftaroline h *Daptomycin j *Daptomycin j Aztreonam Linezolid Linezolid Amoxicillin-clavulanate Ampicillin-sulbactam Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate Cefuroxime Cefepime Doxycycline Minocycline b Tetracycline a Vancomycin Cefepime Cefotetan Cefoxitin Cefotaxime d,e or ceftriaxone d,e Ciprofloxacin d Levofloxacin d Doripenem Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole d Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin Doripenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillintazobactam Ticarcillin *, Vancomycin Rifampin g

GROUP B PRIMARY TEST REPORT SELECTIVELY Tables 1A: Group B Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Enterococcus Enterobacteriaceae aeruginosa spp. spp. m Amikacin Amikacin Ceftaroline h *Daptomycin j *Daptomycin j Aztreonam Linezolid Linezolid Amoxicillin-clavulanate Ampicillin-sulbactam Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate Cefuroxime Cefepime Doxycycline Minocycline b Tetracycline a Vancomycin Cefepime Cefotetan Cefoxitin Cefotaxime d,e or ceftriaxone d,e Ciprofloxacin d Levofloxacin d Doripenem Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole d Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin Doripenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillintazobactam Ticarcillin *, Vancomycin Rifampin g

GROUP B PRIMARY TEST REPORT SELECTIVELY Tables 1A: Group B Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Enterococcus Enterobacteriaceae aeruginosa spp. spp. m Amikacin Amikacin Ceftaroline h *Daptomycin j *Daptomycin j Aztreonam Linezolid Linezolid Amoxicillin-clavulanate Cefepime Doxycycline Ampicillin-sulbactam h. For S. aureus only including Minocycline methicillinresistant Staphylococcus Tetracycline aureus a (MRSA). b Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate Cefuroxime Vancomycin Cefepime Cefotetan Cefoxitin Cefotaxime d,e or ceftriaxone d,e Ciprofloxacin d Levofloxacin d Doripenem Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole d Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin Doripenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillintazobactam Ticarcillin *, Vancomycin Rifampin g

GROUP B PRIMARY TEST REPORT SELECTIVELY Tables 1A: Group B Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Enterococcus Enterobacteriaceae aeruginosa spp. spp. m Amikacin Amikacin Ceftaroline h *Daptomycin j *Daptomycin j Aztreonam Linezolid Linezolid Amoxicillin-clavulanate Ampicillin-sulbactam Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate Cefuroxime Cefepime Doxycycline Minocycline b Tetracycline a j. Daptomycin should not be reported for isolates from the respiratory Vancomycin tract. Cefepime Cefotetan Cefoxitin Cefotaxime d,e or ceftriaxone d,e Ciprofloxacin d Levofloxacin d Doripenem Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole d Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin Doripenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillintazobactam Ticarcillin *, Vancomycin Rifampin g

GROUP B PRIMARY TEST REPORT SELECTIVELY Tables 1A: Group B Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Enterococcus Enterobacteriaceae aeruginosa spp. spp. m Amikacin Amikacin Ceftaroline h *Daptomycin j *Daptomycin j Aztreonam Linezolid Linezolid Amoxicillin-clavulanate Ampicillin-sulbactam Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate Cefuroxime Cefepime Doxycycline Minocycline b Tetracycline a Vancomycin a. Organisms that are susceptible to tetracycline are also considered susceptible to doxycycline and minocycline. Ciprofloxacin *, Vancomycin Levofloxacin Cefepime However, some organisms Doripenem that are Rifampin intermediate g or Imipenem resistant to tetracycline Meropenem may be susceptible to doxycycline, minocycline, or both. Cefotetan Cefoxitin Cefotaxime d,e or ceftriaxone d,e Ciprofloxacin d Levofloxacin d Doripenem Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole d Piperacillintazobactam Ticarcillin

GROUP B PRIMARY TEST REPORT SELECTIVELY Tables 1A: Group B Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Enterococcus Enterobacteriaceae aeruginosa spp. spp. m Amikacin Amikacin Ceftaroline h *Daptomycin j *Daptomycin j Aztreonam Linezolid Linezolid Amoxicillin-clavulanate Ampicillin-sulbactam Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate Cefuroxime Cefepime Doxycycline Minocycline b Tetracycline a Vancomycin Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin *, Vancomycin Cefepime Cefotetan Cefoxitin Cefotaxime d,e or ceftriaxone d,e Ciprofloxacin d Levofloxacin d Doripenem Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillin Piperacillintazobactam Ticarcillin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole d Doripenem Imipenem Meropenem Rifampin g g. Rx: Rifampin should not be used alone for antimicrobial therapy.

GROUP B PRIMARY TEST REPORT SELECTIVELY Tables 1A: Group B Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Enterococcus Enterobacteriaceae aeruginosa spp. spp. m Amikacin Amikacin Ceftaroline h *Daptomycin j *Daptomycin j Aztreonam Linezolid Linezolid Amoxicillin-clavulanate Ampicillin-sulbactam Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate Cefuroxime Cefepime Doxycycline Minocycline b Tetracycline a Vancomycin Cefepime Cefotetan Cefoxitin Cefotaxime d,e or ceftriaxone d,e Ciprofloxacin d Levofloxacin d Doripenem Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole d Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin Doripenem Imipenem Meropenem Piperacillintazobactam Ticarcillin *, Vancomycin Rifampin g

Table 2A. Zone Diameter and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Enterobacteriaceae Testing Conditions Medium: Inoculum: Incubation: Disk diffusion: Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) Broth dilution: cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) Agar dilution: MHA Growth method or direct colony suspension, equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard 35 2 C; ambient air; Disk diffusion: 16 to 18 hours Dilution methods: 16 to 20 hours Routine QC Recommendations (See Tables 4A and 5A for acceptable QC ranges.) Escherichia coli ATCC * 25922 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (for carbapenems) Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 (for -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor combinations) General Comments (1) For disk diffusion, test a maximum of 12 disks on a 150-mm plate and up to 6 disks on a 100-mm plate; disks should be placed no less than 24 mm apart, center to center (M02, Section 9.2 will be updated during its next scheduled revision to include this recommendation). Each zone diameter should be clearly measurable; overlapping zones prevent accurate measurement. Measure the diameter of the zones of complete inhibition (as judged by the unaided eye), including the diameter of the disk. Hold the Petri plate a few inches above a black background illuminated with reflected light. The zone margin should be considered the area showing no obvious, visible growth that can be detected with the unaided eye. Ignore faint growth of tiny colonies that can be detected only with a magnifying lens at the edge of the zone of inhibited growth. Strains of Proteus spp. may swarm into areas of inhibited growth around certain antimicrobial agents. With Proteus spp., ignore the thin veil of swarming growth in an otherwise obvious zone of growth inhibition. With trimethoprim and the sulfonamides, antagonists in the medium may allow some slight growth; therefore, disregard slight growth (20% or less of the lawn of growth) and measure the more obvious margin to determine the zone diameter. (2) When fecal isolates of Salmonella and Shigella spp. are tested, only ampicillin, a fluoroquinolone, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be reported routinely. In addition, for extraintestinal isolates of Salmonella spp., a third-generation cephalosporin should be tested and reported, and chloramphenicol may be tested and reported if requested. Susceptibility testing is indicated for typhoidal Salmonella (S. Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A C) isolated from extraintestinal and intestinal sources. Routine susceptibility testing is not indicated for nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. isolated from intestinal sources. (3) The dosage regimens shown in the comment column below are those required to achieve plasma drug exposures (in adults with normal renal and hepatic functions) on which breakpoints were based. When implementing new breakpoints, it is strongly recommended that laboratories share this information with infectious disease practitioners, pharmacists, pharmacy and therapeutics committees, and infection control committees. NOTE: Information in boldface type is new or modified since the previous edition.

Table 2A. Zone Diameter and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Enterobacteriaceae Testing Conditions Medium: Inoculum: Incubation: Disk diffusion: Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) Broth dilution: cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) Agar dilution: MHA Growth method or direct colony suspension, equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard 35 2 C; ambient air; Disk diffusion: 16 to 18 hours Dilution methods: 16 to 20 hours Routine QC Recommendations (See Tables 4A and 5A for acceptable QC ranges.) Escherichia coli ATCC * 25922 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (for carbapenems) Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 (for -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor combinations) General Comments (1) For disk diffusion, test a maximum of 12 disks on a 150-mm plate and up to 6 disks on a 100-mm plate; disks should be placed no less than 24 mm apart, center to center (M02, Section 9.2 will be updated during its next scheduled revision to include this recommendation). Each zone diameter should be clearly measurable; overlapping zones prevent accurate measurement. Measure the diameter of the zones of complete inhibition (as judged by the unaided eye), including the diameter of the disk. Hold the Petri plate a few inches above a black background illuminated with reflected light. The zone margin should be considered the area showing no obvious, visible growth that can be detected with the unaided eye. Ignore faint growth of tiny colonies that can be detected only with a magnifying lens at the edge of the zone of inhibited growth. Strains of Proteus spp. may swarm into areas of inhibited growth around certain antimicrobial agents. With Proteus spp., ignore the thin veil of swarming growth in an otherwise obvious zone of growth inhibition. With trimethoprim and the sulfonamides, antagonists in the medium may allow some slight growth; therefore, disregard slight growth (20% or less of the lawn of growth) and measure the more obvious margin to determine the zone diameter. (2) When fecal isolates of Salmonella and Shigella spp. are tested, only ampicillin, a fluoroquinolone, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be reported routinely. In addition, for extraintestinal isolates of Salmonella spp., a third-generation cephalosporin should be tested and reported, and chloramphenicol may be tested and reported if requested. Susceptibility testing is indicated for typhoidal Salmonella (S. Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A C) isolated from extraintestinal and intestinal sources. Routine susceptibility testing is not indicated for nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. isolated from intestinal sources. (3) The dosage regimens shown in the comment column below are those required to achieve plasma drug exposures (in adults with normal renal and hepatic functions) on which breakpoints were based. When implementing new breakpoints, it is strongly recommended that laboratories share this information with infectious disease practitioners, pharmacists, pharmacy and therapeutics committees, and infection control committees. NOTE: Information in boldface type is new or modified since the previous edition.

Table 2A. Zone Diameter and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Enterobacteriaceae Testing Conditions Medium: Inoculum: Incubation: Disk diffusion: Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) Broth dilution: cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) Agar dilution: MHA Growth method or direct colony suspension, equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard 35 2 C; ambient air; Disk diffusion: 16 to 18 hours Dilution methods: 16 to 20 hours Routine QC Recommendations (See Tables 4A and 5A for acceptable QC ranges.) Escherichia coli ATCC * 25922 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (for carbapenems) Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 (for -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor combinations) General Comments (1) For disk diffusion, test a maximum of 12 disks on a 150-mm plate and up to 6 disks on a 100-mm plate; disks should be placed no less than 24 mm apart, center to center (M02, Section 9.2 will be updated during its next scheduled revision to include this recommendation). Each zone diameter should be clearly measurable; overlapping zones prevent accurate measurement. Measure the diameter of the zones of complete inhibition (as judged by the unaided eye), including the diameter of the disk. Hold the Petri plate a few inches above a black background illuminated with reflected light. The zone margin should be considered the area showing no obvious, visible growth that can be detected with the unaided eye. Ignore faint growth of tiny colonies that can be detected only with a magnifying lens at the edge of the zone of inhibited growth. Strains of Proteus spp. may swarm into areas of inhibited growth around certain antimicrobial agents. With Proteus spp., ignore the thin veil of swarming growth in an otherwise obvious zone of growth inhibition. With trimethoprim and the sulfonamides, antagonists in the medium may allow some slight growth; therefore, disregard slight growth (20% or less of the lawn of growth) and measure the more obvious margin to determine the zone diameter. (2) When fecal isolates of Salmonella and Shigella spp. are tested, only ampicillin, a fluoroquinolone, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be reported routinely. In addition, for extraintestinal isolates of Salmonella spp., a third-generation cephalosporin should be tested and reported, and chloramphenicol may be tested and reported if requested. Susceptibility testing is indicated for typhoidal Salmonella (S. Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A C) isolated from extraintestinal and intestinal sources. Routine susceptibility testing is not indicated for nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. isolated from intestinal sources. (3) The dosage regimens shown in the comment column below are those required to achieve plasma drug exposures (in adults with normal renal and hepatic functions) on which breakpoints were based. When implementing new breakpoints, it is strongly recommended that laboratories share this information with infectious disease practitioners, pharmacists, pharmacy and therapeutics committees, and infection control committees. NOTE: Information in boldface type is new or modified since the previous edition.

Table 2A. Zone Diameter and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Enterobacteriaceae Testing Conditions Medium: Inoculum: Incubation: Disk diffusion: Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) Broth dilution: cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) Agar dilution: MHA Growth method or direct colony suspension, equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard 35 2 C; ambient air; Disk diffusion: 16 to 18 hours Dilution methods: 16 to 20 hours Routine QC Recommendations (See Tables 4A and 5A for acceptable QC ranges.) Escherichia coli ATCC * 25922 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (for carbapenems) Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 (for -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor combinations) General Comments (1) For disk diffusion, test a maximum of 12 disks on a 150-mm plate and up to 6 disks on a 100-mm plate; disks should be placed no less than 24 mm apart, center to center (M02, Section 9.2 will be updated during its next scheduled revision to include this recommendation). Each zone diameter should be clearly measurable; overlapping zones prevent accurate measurement. Measure the diameter of the zones of complete inhibition (as judged by the unaided eye), including the diameter of the disk. Hold the Petri plate a few inches above a black background illuminated with reflected light. The zone margin should be considered the area showing no obvious, visible growth that can be detected with the unaided eye. Ignore faint growth of tiny colonies that can be detected only with a magnifying lens at the edge of the zone of inhibited growth. Strains of Proteus spp. may swarm into areas of inhibited growth around certain antimicrobial agents. With Proteus spp., ignore the thin veil of swarming growth in an otherwise obvious zone of growth inhibition. With trimethoprim and the sulfonamides, antagonists in the medium may allow some slight growth; therefore, disregard slight growth (20% or less of the lawn of growth) and measure the more obvious margin to determine the zone diameter. (2) When fecal isolates of Salmonella and Shigella spp. are tested, only ampicillin, a fluoroquinolone, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be reported routinely. In addition, for extraintestinal isolates of Salmonella spp., a third-generation cephalosporin should be tested and reported, and chloramphenicol may be tested and reported if requested. Susceptibility testing is indicated for typhoidal Salmonella (S. Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A C) isolated from extraintestinal and intestinal sources. Routine susceptibility testing is not indicated for nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. isolated from intestinal sources. (3) The dosage regimens shown in the comment column below are those required to achieve plasma drug exposures (in adults with normal renal and hepatic functions) on which breakpoints were based. When implementing new breakpoints, it is strongly recommended that laboratories share this information with infectious disease practitioners, pharmacists, pharmacy and therapeutics committees, and infection control committees. NOTE: Information in boldface type is new or modified since the previous edition.

Table 2A. Zone Diameter and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Enterobacteriaceae Antimicrobial Agent Disk Content Zone Diameter Interpretive Criteria (nearest whole mm) MIC Interpretive Criteria (µg/ml) SD D I R S SDD I R Test/Report Group S Comments PENICILLINS A Ampicillin 10 g 17 14 16 13 8 16 32 (4) Results of ampicillin testing can be used to predict results for amoxicillin. See comment (2). B Piperacillin 100 g 21 18 20 17 16 32 64 128 O Mecillinam 10 g 15 12 14 11 8 16 32 (5) For testing and reporting of E. coli urinary tract isolates only. O Ticarcillin 75 g 20 15 19 14 16 32 64 128 β-lactam/β-lactamase INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS B Amoxicillin-clavulanate 20/10 µg 18 14 17 13 8/4 16/8 32/16 B Ampicillin-sulbactam 10/10 µg 15 12 14 11 8/4 16/8 32/16 B Piperacillin-tazobactam 100/10 µg 21 18 20 17 16/4 32/4 64/4 128/4 B Ticarcillin-clavulanate 75/10 µg 20 15 19 14 16/2 32/2 64/2 128/2 CEPHEMS (PARENTERAL) (Including cephalosporins I, II, III, and IV. Please refer to Glossary I.) (6) WARNING: For Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., first- and second-generation cephalosporins and cephamycins may appear active in vitro, but are not effective clinically and should not be reported as susceptible. (7) Following evaluation of PK-PD properties, limited clinical data, and MIC distributions, revised interpretive criteria for cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, and ceftriaxone) and aztreonam were first published in January 2010 (M100-S20) and are listed in this table. Cefuroxime (parenteral) was also evaluated; however, no change in interpretive criteria was required for the dosage indicated below. When using the current interpretive criteria, routine ESBL testing is no longer necessary before reporting results (ie, it is no longer necessary to edit results for cephalosporins, aztreonam, or penicillins from susceptible to resistant). However, ESBL testing may still be useful for epidemiological or infection control purposes. For laboratories that have not implemented the current interpretive criteria, ESBL testing should be performed as described in Table 3A. Note that interpretive criteria for drugs with limited availability in many countries (eg, moxalactam, cefonicid, cefamandole, and cefoperazone) were not evaluated. If considering use of these drugs for E. coli, Klebsiella, or Proteus spp., ESBL testing should be performed (see Table 3A). If isolates test ESBL positive, the results for moxalactam, cefonicid, cefamandole, and cefoperazone should be reported as resistant. (8) Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Serratia may develop resistance during prolonged therapy with third-generation cephalosporins as a result of derepression of AmpC -lactamase. Therefore, isolates that are initially susceptible may become resistant within three to four days after initiation of therapy. Testing of repeat isolates may be warranted. A Cefazolin 30 µg 23 20 22 19 C Ceftaroline 30 µg 23 20 22 19 2 4 8 (9) Interpretive criteria are based on a dosage regimen of 2 g every 8 h. See comment (7). For UTI interpretive criteria, see below under CEPHEMS (ORAL). 0.5 1 2 (10) Interpretive criteria are based on a dosage regimen of 600 mg every 12 h.

Table 2A. Zone Diameter and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Enterobacteriaceae Antimicrobial Agent Disk Content Zone Diameter Interpretive Criteria (nearest whole mm) MIC Interpretive Criteria (µg/ml) SD D I R S SDD I R Test/Report Group S Comments PENICILLINS A Ampicillin 10 g 17 14 16 13 8 16 32 (4) Results of ampicillin testing can be used to predict results for amoxicillin. See comment (2). B Piperacillin 100 g 21 18 20 17 16 32 64 128 O Mecillinam 10 g 15 12 14 11 8 16 32 (5) For testing and reporting of E. coli urinary tract isolates only. O Ticarcillin 75 g 20 15 19 14 16 32 64 128 β-lactam/β-lactamase INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS B Amoxicillin-clavulanate 20/10 µg 18 14 17 13 8/4 16/8 32/16 B Ampicillin-sulbactam 10/10 µg 15 12 14 11 8/4 16/8 32/16 B Piperacillin-tazobactam 100/10 µg 21 18 20 17 16/4 32/4 64/4 128/4 B Ticarcillin-clavulanate 75/10 µg 20 15 19 14 16/2 32/2 64/2 128/2 CEPHEMS (PARENTERAL) (Including cephalosporins I, II, III, and IV. Please refer to Glossary I.) (6) WARNING: For Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., first- and second-generation cephalosporins and cephamycins may appear active in vitro, but are not effective clinically and should not be reported as susceptible. (7) Following evaluation of PK-PD properties, limited clinical data, and MIC distributions, revised interpretive criteria for cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, and ceftriaxone) and aztreonam were first published in January 2010 (M100-S20) and are listed in this table. Cefuroxime (parenteral) was also evaluated; however, no change in interpretive criteria was required for the dosage indicated below. When using the current interpretive criteria, routine ESBL testing is no longer necessary before reporting results (ie, it is no longer necessary to edit results for cephalosporins, aztreonam, or penicillins from susceptible to resistant). However, ESBL testing may still be useful for epidemiological or infection control purposes. For laboratories that have not implemented the current interpretive criteria, ESBL testing should be performed as described in Table 3A. Note that interpretive criteria for drugs with limited availability in many countries (eg, moxalactam, cefonicid, cefamandole, and cefoperazone) were not evaluated. If considering use of these drugs for E. coli, Klebsiella, or Proteus spp., ESBL testing should be performed (see Table 3A). If isolates test ESBL positive, the results for moxalactam, cefonicid, cefamandole, and cefoperazone should be reported as resistant. (8) Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Serratia may develop resistance during prolonged therapy with third-generation cephalosporins as a result of derepression of AmpC -lactamase. Therefore, isolates that are initially susceptible may become resistant within three to four days after initiation of therapy. Testing of repeat isolates may be warranted. A Cefazolin 30 µg 23 20 22 19 C Ceftaroline 30 µg 23 20 22 19 2 4 8 (9) Interpretive criteria are based on a dosage regimen of 2 g every 8 h. See comment (7). For UTI interpretive criteria, see below under CEPHEMS (ORAL). 0.5 1 2 (10) Interpretive criteria are based on a dosage regimen of 600 mg every 12 h.

Table 2A. Zone Diameter and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Enterobacteriaceae Antimicrobial Agent Disk Content Zone Diameter Interpretive Criteria (nearest whole mm) MIC Interpretive Criteria (µg/ml) SD D I R S SDD I R Test/Report Group S Comments PENICILLINS A Ampicillin 10 g 17 14 16 13 8 16 32 (4) Results of ampicillin testing can be used to predict results for amoxicillin. See comment (2). B Piperacillin 100 g 21 18 20 17 16 32 64 128 O Mecillinam 10 g 15 12 14 11 8 16 32 (5) For testing and reporting of E. coli urinary tract isolates only. O Ticarcillin 75 g 20 15 19 14 16 32 64 128 β-lactam/β-lactamase INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS B Amoxicillin-clavulanate 20/10 µg 18 14 17 13 8/4 16/8 32/16 B Ampicillin-sulbactam 10/10 µg 15 12 14 11 8/4 16/8 32/16 B Piperacillin-tazobactam 100/10 µg 21 18 20 17 16/4 32/4 64/4 128/4 B Ticarcillin-clavulanate 75/10 µg 20 15 19 14 16/2 32/2 64/2 128/2 CEPHEMS (PARENTERAL) (Including cephalosporins I, II, III, and IV. Please refer to Glossary I.) (6) WARNING: For Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., first- and second-generation cephalosporins and cephamycins may appear active in vitro, but are not effective clinically and should not be reported as susceptible. (7) Following evaluation of PK-PD properties, limited clinical data, and MIC distributions, revised interpretive criteria for cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, and ceftriaxone) and aztreonam were first published in January 2010 (M100-S20) and are listed in this table. Cefuroxime (parenteral) was also evaluated; however, no change in interpretive criteria was required for the dosage indicated below. When using the current interpretive criteria, routine ESBL testing is no longer necessary before reporting results (ie, it is no longer necessary to edit results for cephalosporins, aztreonam, or penicillins from susceptible to resistant). However, ESBL testing may still be useful for epidemiological or infection control purposes. For laboratories that have not implemented the current interpretive criteria, ESBL testing should be performed as described in Table 3A. Note that interpretive criteria for drugs with limited availability in many countries (eg, moxalactam, cefonicid, cefamandole, and cefoperazone) were not evaluated. If considering use of these drugs for E. coli, Klebsiella, or Proteus spp., ESBL testing should be performed (see Table 3A). If isolates test ESBL positive, the results for moxalactam, cefonicid, cefamandole, and cefoperazone should be reported as resistant. (8) Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Serratia may develop resistance during prolonged therapy with third-generation cephalosporins as a result of derepression of AmpC -lactamase. Therefore, isolates that are initially susceptible may become resistant within three to four days after initiation of therapy. Testing of repeat isolates may be warranted. A Cefazolin 30 µg 23 20 22 19 C Ceftaroline 30 µg 23 20 22 19 2 4 8 (9) Interpretive criteria are based on a dosage regimen of 2 g every 8 h. See comment (7). For UTI interpretive criteria, see below under CEPHEMS (ORAL). 0.5 1 2 (10) Interpretive criteria are based on a dosage regimen of 600 mg every 12 h.

Table 2A. Zone Diameter and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Enterobacteriaceae Antimicrobial Agent Disk Content Zone Diameter Interpretive Criteria (nearest whole mm) MIC Interpretive Criteria (µg/ml) SD D I R S SDD I R Test/Report Group S Comments PENICILLINS A Ampicillin 10 g 17 14 16 13 8 16 32 (4) Results of ampicillin testing can be used to predict results for amoxicillin. See comment (2). B Piperacillin 100 g 21 18 20 17 16 32 64 128 O Mecillinam 10 g 15 12 14 11 8 16 32 (5) For testing and reporting of E. coli urinary tract isolates only. O Ticarcillin 75 g 20 15 19 14 16 32 64 128 β-lactam/β-lactamase INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS B Amoxicillin-clavulanate 20/10 µg 18 14 17 13 8/4 16/8 32/16 B Ampicillin-sulbactam 10/10 µg 15 12 14 11 8/4 16/8 32/16 B Piperacillin-tazobactam 100/10 µg 21 18 20 17 16/4 32/4 64/4 128/4 B Ticarcillin-clavulanate 75/10 µg 20 15 19 14 16/2 32/2 64/2 128/2 CEPHEMS (PARENTERAL) (Including cephalosporins I, II, III, and IV. Please refer to Glossary I.) (6) WARNING: For Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., first- and second-generation cephalosporins and cephamycins may appear active in vitro, but are not effective clinically and should not be reported as susceptible. (7) Following evaluation of PK-PD properties, limited clinical data, and MIC distributions, revised interpretive criteria for cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, and ceftriaxone) and aztreonam were first published in January 2010 (M100-S20) and are listed in this table. Cefuroxime (parenteral) was also evaluated; however, no change in interpretive criteria was required for the dosage indicated below. When using the current interpretive criteria, routine ESBL testing is no longer necessary before reporting results (ie, it is no longer necessary to edit results for cephalosporins, aztreonam, or penicillins from susceptible to resistant). However, ESBL testing may still be useful for epidemiological or infection control purposes. For laboratories that have not implemented the current interpretive criteria, ESBL testing should be performed as described in Table 3A. Note that interpretive criteria for drugs with limited availability in many countries (eg, moxalactam, cefonicid, cefamandole, and cefoperazone) were not evaluated. If considering use of these drugs for E. coli, Klebsiella, or Proteus spp., ESBL testing should be performed (see Table 3A). If isolates test ESBL positive, the results for moxalactam, cefonicid, cefamandole, and cefoperazone should be reported as resistant. (8) Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Serratia may develop resistance during prolonged therapy with third-generation cephalosporins as a result of derepression of AmpC -lactamase. Therefore, isolates that are initially susceptible may become resistant within three to four days after initiation of therapy. Testing of repeat isolates may be warranted. A Cefazolin 30 µg 23 20 22 19 C Ceftaroline 30 µg 23 20 22 19 2 4 8 (9) Interpretive criteria are based on a dosage regimen of 2 g every 8 h. See comment (7). For UTI interpretive criteria, see below under CEPHEMS (ORAL). 0.5 1 2 (10) Interpretive criteria are based on a dosage regimen of 600 mg every 12 h.

Table 2A. Zone Diameter and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Interpretive Standards for Enterobacteriaceae Antimicrobial Agent Disk Content Zone Diameter Interpretive Criteria (nearest whole mm) MIC Interpretive Criteria (µg/ml) SD D I R S SDD I R Test/Report Group S Comments PENICILLINS A Ampicillin 10 g 17 14 16 13 8 16 32 (4) Results of ampicillin testing can be used to predict results for amoxicillin. See comment (2). B Piperacillin 100 g 21 18 20 17 16 32 64 128 O Mecillinam 10 g 15 12 14 11 8 16 32 (5) For testing and reporting of E. coli urinary tract isolates only. O Ticarcillin 75 g 20 15 19 14 16 32 64 128 β-lactam/β-lactamase INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS B Amoxicillin-clavulanate 20/10 µg 18 14 17 13 8/4 16/8 32/16 B Ampicillin-sulbactam 10/10 µg 15 12 14 11 8/4 16/8 32/16 B Piperacillin-tazobactam 100/10 µg 21 18 20 17 16/4 32/4 64/4 128/4 B Ticarcillin-clavulanate 75/10 µg 20 15 19 14 16/2 32/2 64/2 128/2 CEPHEMS (PARENTERAL) (Including cephalosporins I, II, III, and IV. Please refer to Glossary I.) (6) WARNING: For Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., first- and second-generation cephalosporins and cephamycins may appear active in vitro, but are not effective clinically and should not be reported as susceptible. (7) Following evaluation of PK-PD properties, limited clinical data, and MIC distributions, revised interpretive criteria for cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, and ceftriaxone) and aztreonam were first published in January 2010 (M100-S20) and are listed in this table. Cefuroxime (parenteral) was also evaluated; however, no change in interpretive criteria was required for the dosage indicated below. When using the current interpretive criteria, routine ESBL testing is no longer necessary before reporting results (ie, it is no longer necessary to edit results for cephalosporins, aztreonam, or penicillins from susceptible to resistant). However, ESBL testing may still be useful for epidemiological or infection control purposes. For laboratories that have not implemented the current interpretive criteria, ESBL testing should be performed as described in Table 3A. Note that interpretive criteria for drugs with limited availability in many countries (eg, moxalactam, cefonicid, cefamandole, and cefoperazone) were not evaluated. If considering use of these drugs for E. coli, Klebsiella, or Proteus spp., ESBL testing should be performed (see Table 3A). If isolates test ESBL positive, the results for moxalactam, cefonicid, cefamandole, and cefoperazone should be reported as resistant. (8) Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Serratia may develop resistance during prolonged therapy with third-generation cephalosporins as a result of derepression of AmpC -lactamase. Therefore, isolates that are initially susceptible may become resistant within three to four days after initiation of therapy. Testing of repeat isolates may be warranted. A Cefazolin 30 µg 23 20 22 19 C Ceftaroline 30 µg 23 20 22 19 2 4 8 (9) Interpretive criteria are based on a dosage regimen of 2 g every 8 h. See comment (7). For UTI interpretive criteria, see below under CEPHEMS (ORAL). 0.5 1 2 (10) Interpretive criteria are based on a dosage regimen of 600 mg every 12 h.