STAPHYLOCOCCI: KEY AST CHALLENGES

Similar documents
STAPHYLOCOCCI: KEY AST CHALLENGES

STAPHYLOCOCCI: KEY AST CHALLENGES

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(8):

Background and Plan of Analysis

EUCAST Expert Rules for Staphylococcus spp IF resistant to isoxazolylpenicillins

This document is protected by international copyright laws.

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

Staph Cases. Case #1

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The Very Latest from the CLSI AST Subcommittee.

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Update on the CLSI Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: What s New with the Gram Positive Organisms?

Challenges Emerging resistance Fewer new drugs MRSA and other resistant pathogens are major problems

Antibiotic Updates: Part I

Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

UNDERSTANDING YOUR DATA: THE ANTIBIOGRAM

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Volume-7, Issue-2, April-June-2016 Coden IJABFP-CAS-USA Received: 5 th Mar 2016 Revised: 11 th April 2016 Accepted: 13 th April 2016 Research article

Failure of Cloxacillin in a Patient with BORSA Endocarditis ACCEPTED

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Detection of Methicillin Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Using Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods in a Tertiary Care Hospital

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Appropriate Antimicrobial Therapy for Treatment of

Performance Information. Vet use only

What s new in EUCAST methods?

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in Ghana

ENTEROCOCCI. April Abbott Deaconess Health System Evansville, IN

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

UNDERSTANDING THE ANTIBIOGRAM

ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY DETECTION OF ELEVATED MICs TO PENICILLINS IN β- HAEMOLYTIC STREPTOCOCCI

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Antibiotic Abyss. Discussion Points. MRSA Treatment Guidelines

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority

ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTEMPORARY SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS AND TREATMENTS FOR VRE INFECTIONS

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Jasmine M. Chaitram, 1,2 * Laura A. Jevitt, 1,2 Sara Lary, 1,2 Fred C. Tenover, 1,2 and The WHO Antimicrobial Resistance Group 3,4

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

Practical approach to Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and quality control

22/09/2010. Laboratory 2a + b Staphylococci and Streptococci

Saxena Sonal*, Singh Trishla* and Dutta Renu* (Received for publication January 2012)

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY CHARACTERIZING SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERNS OF MSSA ASSOCIATED WITH SURGICAL WOUND INFECTIONS

Chemotherapy of bacterial infections. Part II. Mechanisms of Resistance. evolution of antimicrobial resistance

Methicillin and Clindamycin resistance in biofilm producing staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical specimens

Why we perform susceptibility testing

Antibiotic Resistances Profile in Iran, Clinical Implication and Prospect for Antibiotic Stewardship Jafar Soltani

The Impact of meca Gene Testing and Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Intervention on the Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy for ACCEPTED

Tackling MDROs in the Clinical Laboratory

Empiric therapy for severe suspected Staphylococcus aureus infection

Tel: Fax:

Detecting / Reporting Resistance in Nonfastidious GNR Part #2. Janet A. Hindler, MCLS MT(ASCP)

Le infezioni di cute e tessuti molli

Evaluation of MicroScan MIC Panels for Detection of

MRSA surveillance 2014: Poultry

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Introduction to Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Surveillance for Antimicrobial Resistance and Preparation of an Enhanced Antibiogram at the Local Level. janet hindler

Antimicrobial stewardship: Quick, don t just do something! Stand there!

Performance of VITEK 2 for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Staphylococcus spp.

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

Rise of Resistance: From MRSA to CRE

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Management of Native Valve

Consequences of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria. Antimicrobial Resistance. Molecular Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance. Topics to be Covered

Resistance Among Streptococcus pneumoniae: Patterns, Mechanisms, Interpreting the Breakpoints

MID 23. Antimicrobial Resistance. Consequences of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria. Molecular Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial Resistance Acquisition of Foreign DNA

Appropriate Management of Common Pediatric Infections. Blaise L. Congeni M.D. Akron Children s Hospital Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases

Antibiotics: Rethinking the Old. Jonathan G. Lim, MD, DPPS, DPIDSP

DISCLAIMER: ECHO Nevada emphasizes patient privacy and asks participants to not share ANY Protected Health Information during ECHO clinics.

Continued in vitro cefazolin susceptibility in methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

Infectious Disease: Drug Resistance Pattern in New Mexico

microbiologists. In this article, we will discuss some of the challenges the laboratory faces with antimicrobial susceptibility

An Approach to Linezolid and Vancomycin against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

Best Antimicrobials for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

Mechanism of antibiotic resistance

The β- Lactam Antibiotics. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The University of Jordan November 2018

Antimicrobial Therapy

Transcription:

Romney Humphries, PhD D(ABMM) Section Chief, UCLA Clinical Microbiology Los Angeles CA rhumphries@mednet.ucla.edu STAPHYLOCOCCI: KEY AST CHALLENGES

THE CHALLENGES detection of penicillin resistance detection of MRSA Staphylococcus pseudintermedius vancomycin and S. aureus including VISA inducible clindamycin resistance in staphylococci

Penicillin and Staphylococcus spp. - -lactamase testing

SPECIMEN: BONE DIAGNOSIS: OSTEOMYELITIS STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS MIC ( g/ml) clindamycin 0.5 S erythromycin 0.5 S oxacillin 0.25 S penicillin 0.06 S?? vancomycin 0.5 S Should we do anything about penicillin?

STAPHYLOCOCCUS SPP. PENICILLIN > 90% of staphylococci are penicillin R Penicillin rarely considered for treatment of staphylococcal infections but might be considered for infections requiring lengthy therapy (e.g., endocarditis, osteomyelitis) IF penicillin S Some Staphylococcus spp. that test S by MIC or disk diffusion may possess a β- lactamase and may fail penicillin therapy Agent MIC (µg/ml) Zone (mm) S I R S I R Penicillin 0.12-0.25 29-28

S. aureus S. aureus and CoNS (including S. lugdunensis) CLSI M100-S25. Table 3D.

INDUCED ß-LACTAMASE TEST Oxacillin (inducer) -Sub isolate to agar (e.g., BAP, MHA) -Drop ß-lactam disk (e.g., oxacillin, cefoxitin) -Incubate overnight -Test cells from periphery of zone -If β-lactamase positive (with or without induction), report penicillin R Pos Neg

STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS DISK ZONE EDGE TEST (10 U PENICILLIN DISK AND STANDARD DISK DIFFUSION METHOD NOT VALIDATED FOR MIC PURIT Y PLATES) Fuzzy beach = β-lactamase negative Penicillin - S Sharp cliff = β-lactamase positive Penicillin - R S. aureus QC: Neg - ATCC 25923 Pos - ATCC 29213 (supplemental QC) CLSI M100-S25. Table 3D.

STAPHYLOCOCCUS SPP. PENICILLIN STRATEGY Organism Action S. aureus Report PEN if R; Suppress PEN if S If PEN needed, perform nitrocefin β-lactamase test If nitrocefin β-lactamase test negative, perform PEN disk zone edge test (next day) CoNS Report PEN if R; Suppress PEN if S (except S. If PEN needed, perform nitrocefin β-lactamase test lugdunensis) If nitrocefin β-lactamase test negative, perform induced nitrocefin β-lactamase test All Continue to test subsequent isolates from patient

SPECIMEN: BONE DIAGNOSIS: OSTEOMYELITIS STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS clindamycin MIC ( g/ml) 0.5 S erythromycin 0.5 S oxacillin 0.25 S vancomycin 0.5 S Contact laboratory if penicillin results needed

WHAT ABOUT S. LUGDUNENSIS? Usually very susceptible including penicillin-s UCLA 40-50% PCN R UCLA 3-21% oxacillin R Recommended Rx: oxacillin / nafcillin or penicillin (if β-lactamase negative) Sanford Guide, 45th ed. 2015. PCN Oxa Do not suppress penicillin results!

DETECTION OF BETA-LACTAMASE IN S. LUGDUNENSIS 100 isolates of S. lugdunensis (n=36 blaz + by PCR) Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity Penicillin MIC 100% (96.07-100) 100% (90.51-100) 100% (93.51-100) Induced-nitrocefin 100% (96.07-100) 100% (90.51-100) 100% (93.51-100) Penicillin Disk Diffusion 98.91% (94.09-99.97) 100% (90.51-100) 98.18% (90.28-99.95) Penicillin Zone Edge 45.65% (35.22-56.37) 100% (90.51-100) 9.09% (3.02-19.95) I. McHardy, Manuscript in preparation Many false-positive results!

S. lugdunensis and Penicillin S. lugdunensis Report PEN if R Perform nitrocefin β-lactamase test If nitrocefin β-lactamase test negative, perform induced nitrocefin β-lactamase test Up to 50% are PEN S CLSI M100-S25. Table 3D.

MRSA methicillin-resistant S. aureus - Oxacillin vs. cefoxitin tests - BORSA

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT OPTIONS FOR MSSA INFECTIONS Betalactams Predictable activity dicloxacillin / nafcillin cephalexin / cefazolin amoxicillin-clav ampicillin-sulbactam carbapenem vancomycin dalbavacin, oritavancin, televancin daptomycin linezolid ceftaroline (β-lactam) tigecycline Need AST clindamycin trimethoprim-sulfa macrolide (e.g. clarithromycin) tetracycline fluoroquinolone (e.g. ciprofloxacin) (gentamicin) (rifampin)

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT OPTIONS FOR MSSA INFECTIONS Betalactams Predictable activity dicloxacillin / nafcillin cephalexin / cefazolin amoxicillin-clav ampicillin-sulbactam carbapenem vancomycin dalbavacin, oritavancin, televancin daptomycin linezolid ceftaroline (β-lactam) tigecycline Need AST clindamycin trimethoprim-sulfa macrolide (e.g. clarithromycin) tetracycline fluoroquinolone (e.g. ciprofloxacin) (gentamicin) (rifampin)

TESTS FOR meca-mediated OXACILLIN RESISTANCE IN S. AUREUS Phenotypic tests - Disk diffusion or MIC Cefoxitin as a surrogate Report results for OXACILLIN, not cefoxitin Oxacillin MIC (+ 2% NaCl) Oxacillin-salt agar screen for S. aureus Detection of gene or gene product meca PBP2a Why use cefoxitin to detect MRSA? Sensitivity Specificity Oxacillin 86 % 74 % Cefoxitin 100 % 100 % Swenson et al JCM 2005 43:3818-23

Heteroresistant MRSA Cefoxitin (R) 10 mm zone Cefoxitin detects heteroresistant meca-mediated MRSA better than oxacillin Colonies in zone (heteroresistant) Staphylococcus aureus / S. lugdunensis Agent MIC (µg/ml) Zone (mm) S I R S I R Cefoxitin 4* - 8** 22* - 21** Oxacillin 2-4 NA * Report as oxacillin susceptible ** Report as oxacillin resistant

DEFINITION OF MRSA (2) MRSA are those strains of S. aureus that express meca or another mechanism of methicillin resistance, such as changes in affinity of penicillin binding proteins for oxacillin (modified S. aureus [MOD-SA] strains) MRSA = S. aureus with meca and/or oxacillin MIC >2 µg/ml and/or cefoxitin R CLSI M100-S25. Table 2C.

OX S. AUREUS OR S. LUGDUNENSIS TESTING BOTH OX AND CX CX Resistance mechanism Relative Prevalence Report as OX: S S None Common S R R meca Common R S R meca (low level expression) Uncommon R* R S PBP changes or hyperproduction of β-lactamase (borderline MRSA) Rare R* *most commercial system software expertise to R (3) Isolates that test resistant by oxacillin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), cefoxitin MIC, or cefoxitin disk test should be reported as oxacillin resistant. CLSI M100-S25. Table 2C.

WHAT ABOUT BORDERLINE MRSA? Oxacillin MIC slightly above R breakpoint Cefoxitin S meca negative Mechanisms: Modifications in penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) 1,2,4 (MOD-SA) Hyperproduction of blaz-encoded penicillinase Methicillinase Infrequently encountered Limited clinical information in literature re: therapy Chambers. 1997. Clin Microbiol Rev. 10:781. Skinner et al. 2009. J Clin Microbiol. 47:859. Croes et al. 2010. Clin Microbiol Infection. 16:979. Maalej et al. 2012. J Clin Microbiol. 50:3345.

WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO CORRECTLY AND QUICKLY IDENTIFY MRSA AND MSSA? MRSA infections - β-lactams (except ceftaroline) ineffective MSSA infections β-lactams better than vancomycin For bacteremia Vancomycin associated with 2 3 times the risk of morbidity and mortality vs β-lactam (e.g., oxacillin and nafcillin, cefazolin) Switching from vancomycin to β-lactam inferior to starting with β-lactam McConeghy et al. 2013. Clin Infect Dis. 57:1760. If you focus on ONE thing focus on getting this right!

WHAT S MECC? mecc 1 Human and bovine MRSA were reported in 2011 that carry a new meca homologue, mecc Human cases retrospectively identified in 1975, 1992 but most since 2003 2 Harbors ~68-70% genetic similarity to meca Mostly found in veterinary isolates, all in Europe, but some human cases to date in Denmark, Germany, France, UK and Spain Currently only detected by cefoxitin resistance - Typically have low oxacillin MICs - meca PCR, PBP2a tests do not work for these 1. Additional reading for mecc: Laurent et al 2012 EID 18:1465; Garcia-Alvarez et al 2011 Lancet Infect Dis 11:595 2. Petersen et al CMI 2013. 19:E16 3. Cartwright et al. 2014. J Clin Microbiol. 51:2732. 23

WHAT ARE CLSI RULES FOR DETECTING MRCONS? Species Rule S. lugdunensis Use oxacillin and cefoxitin breakpoints as for S. aureus S. saprophyticus Don t test; add comment to report re: appropriate therapy for S. saprophyticus UTI S. epidermidis Use CoNS oxacillin MIC and/or cefoxitin DD breakpoints - work well Other CoNS Use caution for oxacillin MICs 0.5-2.0 µg/ml; cefoxitin DD testing is better! CoNS oxacillin-r more heterogeneous than S. aureus; lower breakpoint

REPORTING STRATEGY OXACILLIN MIC RESULTS FOR CONS* * For testing non-s. epidermidis isolates from sterile sites where CoNS is causing an infection Oxacillin MIC (µg/ml) S I R 0.25 Report Oxacillin S Negative Oxacillin MIC (µg/ml) 0.5-2.0 Do meca or PBP2a or Cefoxitin disk Positive 4 Report Oxacillin R 0.2 5-0.5 Report Oxacillin S Report Oxacillin R

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius 26

STAPHYLOCOCCUS PSEUDINTERMEDIUS Part of Staphylococcus intermedius Group (SIG) Other species in SIG Staphylococcus intermedius Staphylococcus delphini Colonizes nares and anal mucosa of healthy dogs and cats Most common cause of canine pyoderma and sometimes causes urinary tract and joint infections in dogs and cats 27

STAPHYLOCOCCUS PSEUDINTERMEDIUS Increasingly isolated from human specimens: wounds (bites), sinuses, and blood, etc. Identification MALDI TOF Tube coagulase positive; clumping factor (slide coagulase) negative Masquerades as S. aureus S. pseudintermedius can be misdiagnosed as S. aureus in humans with dog bite wounds Börjesson et al., 2015. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 34:839-844. Commercial phenotypic ID tests often call this S. intermedius Some meca positive Not detected with CLSI S. aureus cefoxitin or oxacillin breakpoints 28

S. PSEUDINTERMEDIUS VS. S. AUREUS S. pseudintermedius BAP (BD) @ 24 hr 35 C (ambient air) Test S. aureus S. pseudintermedius Hemolysis + + Tube coag + + Slide coag + - PYR - + VP + V D- Trehalose + + - 90% strains negative + 90% strains positive V, variable; 11-89% strains positive Courtesy of Lars Westblade Modified from Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11 th ed. 29

% Oxacillin Resistant METHICILLIN-RESISTANT S. PSEUDINTERMEDIUS ISOLATES FROM DOGS 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 N=13 6 N=17 6 N=24 4 N=25 4 N=23 7 N=30 4 Year N=40 4 N=47 9 N=39 3 N=45 8 N=56 0 N=54 3 Courtesy of David Bemis University of Tennessee 30

5 labs Testing STAPHYLOCOCCUS PSEUDINTERMEDIUS CLSI MULTICENTER STUDY meca PCR; mecc PCR SCCmec typing and reppcr CLSI disk diffusion (oxacillin/cefoxitin) CLSI broth microdilution MIC (oxacillin/cefoxitin) Automated systems: BD Phoenix; MicroScan; Vitek2 Alere PBP2a (induced/uninduced) Isolates (n=111): 45 human 69 nonhuman 37 meca + 74 meca Wu et al. 2015. J Clin Micro. Epub Nov. 02864-15. 31

Number of Isolates S. pseudintermedius Oxacillin MIC Distribution (n=111) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 S. pseudintermedius Breakpoint S. aureus Breakpoint meca positive meca negative 0 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 >16 MIC (µg/ml) 32

no zone 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Number of Isolates S. pseudintermedius Oxacillin Zone Distribution (n=111) 25 20 S. pseudintermedius Breakpoint meca positive meca negative 15 10 5 0 Zone Size (mm) 33

Number of Isolates S. pseudintermedius Cefoxitin Zone Distribution (n=111) Don t use cefoxitin! 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 CoNS Breakpoint S. aureus Breakpoint meca positive meca negative Some false S and some false R with any breakpoint! 0 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 Zone (mm) 34

S. pseudintermedius Performance Compared to meca Result Phenotypic Test CA VME ME Oxacillin MIC 99.1% 0 (0%) 1 (1.3%) Oxacillin Disk 99.1% 0 (0%) 1 (1.3%) PBP2a uninduced 96.5% 4 (10.8%) 0 (0.0%) PBP2a uninduced 100% 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 111 isolates; 37 meca +; 74 meca CA, category agreement (S, R agreement) VME, very major errors (false S ) ME, major errors (false R ) 35

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius M100S 26 th ed. p. 77. 36

AUTOMATED AST OXACILLIN VS. S. PSEUDINTERMEDIUS System BD Phoenix S. aureus Breakpoints CoNS Breakpoints CA VME ME CA VME ME 90.4% Vitek2 93.0% 11 (29.7%) 8 (21.6%) 0 95.7% 0 98.3% 4 (10.8%) 1 (2.7%) MicroScan 95.7% 5(13.5%) 0 99.1% 0 1 (1.3%) 1 (1.3%) 1 (1.3%) No commercial system is FDA cleared for AST of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius 37

Vancomycin and S. aureus See.. Howden et al. 2010. Clin Microbiol Rev. 23:99.

SPECIMEN: BLOOD DIAGNOSIS: BACTEREMIA STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS oxacillin penicillin vancomycin vancomycin MIC ( g/ml) >16 R R 1 S (automated) 1.5 S (Etest) What about vancomycin MIC?

S. AUREUS - VANCOMYCIN MIC INTERPRETIVE CRITERIA ( G/ML) Susceptible Intermediat e Resistant 2 4-8 16 VSSA 1 vs 2 µg/ml VISA VRSA Vancomycin released 1950s; first resistance (VISA) 1990s! CLSI M100-S25. Table 2C.

CONTEMPORARY THOUGHTS ON TREATING MRSA BACTEREMIA WITH VANCOMYCIN Based on PK/PD, clinical outcome may vary if vancomycin treatment for isolates with susceptible MICs of 1 vs. 2 µg/ml Maintain trough serum concentration of 15-20 mg/l Liu et al. 2011. Clin Infect Dis. 52:285. Some say if vancomycin S MIC (µg/ml): <1.5 use vancomycin 1.5 - use alternative Recent study: No differences if MIC <1.5 or 1.5 µg/ml in risk of death; can t exclude increased mortality risk Kalil et al. 2014. JAMA. 312:1552. Reproducibility of MIC = +/- 1 two-fold dilution!!!!

IDSA GUIDELINES SUGGEST USING VANCOMYCIN MICS TO GUIDE THERAPY AS FOLLOWS.. MIC (µg/ml) 2 (Susceptible) >2 (e.g., VISA or VRSA) IDSA Guidelines Recommendation The patient s clinical response should determine the continued use of vancomycin, independent of the MIC An alternative to vancomycin should be used Liu et al. 2011. Clin Infect Dis. 52:1.

Vancomycin MIC (N=101 MRSA) Etest MICs > Reference Broth Microdilution and Agar Dilution MICs Prakash et al. 2008. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 52:4528. See also Hsu et al. 2008. Intl J Antimicrob Agents. 32:378. Sader et al. 2009. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 53:3162.

48 hour growth on blood agar plate MRSA VISA VSSA VISA VSSA Marlowe, et al. 2001. J Clin Microbiol. 39:2637. Howden et al. 2010. CMR. 23:99.

CHARACTERISTICS SOMETIMES OBSERVED FOR VISA Colony morphology may be atypical for S. aureus (some pinpoint) Delayed growth in broth (e.g., blood culture) Weak / delayed coagulase reaction After several subcultures: Colony morphology becomes typical for S. aureus Vancomycin MIC decreases and isolate becomes vancomycin susceptible MICs for daptomycin increase MICs for -lactams decrease

PERSISTENT MRSA BACTEREMIA PATIENT #1 DAPTOMYCIN MIC STORY Patient receives 49 days daptomycin for MRSA Presents to ED with sepsis: MRSA in blood MRSA only tested every 5 days for AST from blood Daptomycin NS MRSA recognized on hospital day 8 Daptomycin NS isolate was found in blood bottle collected in ED (but not tested because it took longer to grow) Giltner et al. 2014. J Clin Microbiol. 52:357.

PERSISTENT MRSA BACTEREMIA PATIENT #1 DAPTOMYCIN MIC STORY Day of Hospitalization on Which Blood Culture Drawn Routine AST done on S. aureus at time of isolation? Why? 1 Yes First S. aureus isolated from this hospitalization 0 No Recovered after MRSA from Day 1 was isolated 8 Yes More than 5 days elapsed since previous AST done 10-13 No Less than 5 days elapsed since previous AST done 15 Yes More than 5 days elapsed since previous AST done Daptomycin MIC (µg/ml) 0.5 S 4 NS* 2 NS 0.5 S, 1S 2 NS* 8 NS *results obtained from retrospective testing Giltner et al. 2014. J Clin Microbiol. 52:357.

WHAT SHOULD WE DO ABOUT TESTING VANCOMYCIN (& DAPTOMYCIN) FOR MRSA? Use MIC method verified in your laboratory; report according to your SOP Will be some differences by method Avoid repeated subcultures If use multiple methods and get conflicting results must review patient response to vancomycin! Test all isolates from blood, especially if they have atypical morphotype or take a long time to grow If MIC 3 µg/ml by any method, report VISA Most likely in patients previously treated with vancomycin Physicians should be informed about issues with vancomycin MIC testing and need to continually monitor patient response to vancomycin therapy Some refs Howden et al. 2010. Clin Microbiol Rev. 23:99. Liu et al. 2011. Clin Infect Dis. 52:1. Van Hal et al. 2012. Clin Infect Dis. 54:755. Kalil et al. 2014. JAMA 312:1552.

CAN CONS SHOW DECREASED SUSCEPTIBILITY TO VANCOMYCIN? May show increase in MICs following exposure to vancomycin Most common in S. haemolyticus and S. epidermidis Some suggest use alternative to vancomycin for S. haemolyticus Falcone et al. 2007. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 57:325. Method - Organism MIC - S. aureus MIC (µg/ml) S I R 2 * 4-8 16 MIC - CoNS 4 8-16 32 CLSI M100-S25. Table 2C.

Drug OTHER ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS FOR MRSA Route PO IM IV Comments ceftaroline x FDA indications for complicated skin infxns, communityacquired pneumonia β-lactam with activity against MRSA FDA indications for complicated skin infxns, bacteremia daptomycin x Disk diffusion does not work; must do MIC S breakpoint only NOT for respiratory infxns (lung surfactant inhibits drug); do not report on respiratory specimens linezolid x x FDA indications for nosocomial pneumonia, complicated skin infxns, uncomplicated skin infxns (MSSA); communityacquired pneumonia (MSSA) For disk diffusion, examine with transmitted light

Measure linezolid zones with transmitted light (any growth is significant) Linezolid Measuring Endpoints Light Ignore MIC trailing endpoints CLSI M07-A10. p. 31-32.

NEWER ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS MRSA Drug Route PO IM IV Comments dalbavancin oritavancin telavancin x x x FDA indications for complicated skin infxns; S only breakpoint Once/week dose FDA indications for complicated skin infxns; S only breakpoint. One dose FDA indications for complicated skin infxns; community-acquired / hospital-associated pneumonia; S only breakpoint Once/day dose tedizolid x x FDA indications for complicated skin infxns; S/R breakpoint for S. aureus Once/day dose

Staphylococcus spp. -Inducible clindamycin resistance

SPECIMEN: PUS (L BUTTOCK LESION) DIAGNOSIS: LOCALIZED ABSCESS MANY STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS clindamycin S??? erythromycin R oxacillin R penicillin R vancomycin S What should we do about clindamycin results?

STAPHYLOCOCCUS SPP. ERYTHROMYCIN / CLINDAMYCIN Mechanism Determinant Erythro Clinda Efflux msra R S Ribosome modification erm R S* Ribosome modification erm R R constitutive msra = macrolide streptogramin resistance erm = erythromycin ribosome methylase *requires induction to show resistance

S. AUREUS D ZONE TEST D zone test is only for staphylococci that are: Erythromycin R and Clindamycin S or I Photo 1: inducible clindamycin R Photos 2 and 3: erythromycin R and clindamycin R (D zone test NOT needed) 1 2 3

SPECIMEN: PUS (L BUTTOCK LESION) DIAGNOSIS: LOCALIZED ABSCESS MANY STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS clindamycin R Final Report with erythromycin R oxacillin R penicillin R vancomycin S Optional Comment This S. aureus is presumed to be clindamycin resistant based on detection of inducible clindamycin resistance. Clindamycin may still be effective in some patients.

ERYTHROMYCIN-R, CLINDAMYCIN-S STAPHYLOCOCCI TESTS FOR INDUCIBLE CLINDAMYCIN RESISTANCE Notes: Test applies to S. aureus and CoNS (OX-S and OX-R) Test not routinely done on CoNS as clindamycin rarely used for CoNS Clindamycin can be give orally; good option for outpatients if S

SUMMARY (1) An induced -lactamase test usually, but not always detects staphylococci capable of producing -lactamase; for -lactamase negative staphylococci with penicillin MICs 0.12 µg/ml or zones 29 mm, subsequent isolates on a patient should be subjected to AST. Penicillin disk zone edge test is used to detect β- lactamase in S. aureus whereas induced nitrocefin β- lactamase test is used for CoNS. Penicillin disk zone edge test does not work for S. lugdunensis, this organism is often penicillin-s Cefoxitin disk diffusion and cefoxitin MIC tests are more sensitive in detecting meca-mediated resistance in S. aureus than tests using oxacillin. If both oxacillin and cefoxitin are tested against S. aureus or S. lugdunensis and either is resistant, the isolate should be reported as oxacillin resistant.

SUMMARY (2) MRSA are strains that have meca and/or oxacillin MICs >2 µg/ml and/or cefoxitin resistance. Testing for S. aureus as MR or MS should be done as quickly as possible, especially on isolates from serious infections. MRSA with mecc have not yet been reported in the USA. Some suggest serious infections caused by MRSA with vancomycin susceptible MICs of 2 µg/ml may not respond as well to vancomycin therapy as MRSA with vancomycin MICs of 1 µg/ml. When considering alternative therapy to vancomycin for MRSA, patient clinical response and vancomycin MIC must be examined.

SUMMARY (3) Different methods may result in different vancomycin MICs for vancomycin-s S. aureus. Etest produces higher vancomycin MICs than CLSI broth microdilution reference method. Reproducibility of MIC tests is +/- 1 two-fold dilution. VISA are often slow growing and may yield a variety of colony morphologies. Tests for inducible clindamycin resistance should be done before reporting clindamycin S in erythromycin-r and clindamycin-s or I staphylococci. Oxacillin MIC tests work well for S. epidermidis but can overcall oxacillin-r in other CoNS that lack meca. The cefoxitin disk diffusion test is better.