Effect of Antibiotic Treatment on Establishment and Elimination of Intestinal Colonization by KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Mice

Similar documents
Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

Title: Effect of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin on susceptibility to intestinal

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

Antimicrobial Cycling. Donald E Low University of Toronto

Activity of a novel aminoglycoside, ACHN-490, against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from New York City

ECOLOGICAL IMPACT OF NARROW SPECTRUM ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS COMPARED TO BROAD SPECTRUM AGENTS ON THE HUMAN INTESTINAL MICROFLORA CARL ERIK NORD

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Fighting MDR Pathogens in the ICU

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

Infection Control of Emerging Diseases

PRACTIC GUIDELINES for APPROPRIATE ANTIBIOTICS USE

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

b-lactam Antibiotics and Gastrointestinal Colonization with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

on February 12, 2018 by guest

Mili Rani Saha and Sanya Tahmina Jhora. Department of Microbiology, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Mitford, Dhaka, Bangladesh

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

DR. MICHAEL A. BORG DIRECTOR OF INFECTION PREVENTION & CONTROL MATER DEI HOSPITAL - MALTA

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Witchcraft for Gram negatives

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASES EMERGING GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS

New Drugs for Bad Bugs- Statewide Antibiogram

Super Bugs and Wonder Drugs: Protecting the One While Respecting the Many

Background and Plan of Analysis

Antimicrobial Resistance Strains

Other Enterobacteriaceae

ETX0282, a Novel Oral Agent Against Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Nosocomial Infections: What Are the Unmet Needs

The International Collaborative Conference in Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Michael Hombach*, Guido V. Bloemberg and Erik C. Böttger

Title: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) Mediated Modulation of Bacterial Antibiotic

Sepsis is the most common cause of death in

Comparative Assessment of b-lactamases Produced by Multidrug Resistant Bacteria

Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance among Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Hospitalized Patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital,

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Antibiotic Updates: Part II

Mechanism of antibiotic resistance

Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria

Other β-lactamase Inhibitor (BLI) Combinations: Focus on VNRX-5133, WCK 5222 and ETX2514SUL

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

Antimicrobial stewardship: Quick, don t just do something! Stand there!

Update on Resistance and Epidemiology of Nosocomial Respiratory Pathogens in Asia. Po-Ren Hsueh. National Taiwan University Hospital

OPTIMIZATION OF PK/PD OF ANTIBIOTICS FOR RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS

Defining Extended Spectrum b-lactamases: Implications of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration- Based Screening Versus Clavulanate Confirmation Testing

Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics

2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report

ETX2514SUL (sulbactam/etx2514) for the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections

Multi-drug resistant microorganisms

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(3):

Available online at ISSN No:

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

EARS Net Report, Quarter

Secondary peritonitis

INCIDENCE OF BACTERIAL COLONISATION IN HOSPITALISED PATIENTS WITH DRUG-RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS

Antimicrobial stewardship in managing septic patients

against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria

Detecting / Reporting Resistance in Nonfastidious GNR Part #2. Janet A. Hindler, MCLS MT(ASCP)

New Opportunities for Microbiology Labs to Add Value to Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

Hand Hygiene and MDRO (Multidrug-resistant Organisms) - Science and Myth PROF MARGARET IP DEPT OF MICROBIOLOGY

Received: February 29, 2008 Revised: July 22, 2008 Accepted: August 4, 2008

RESISTANT PATHOGENS. John E. Mazuski, MD, PhD Professor of Surgery

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

What s next in the antibiotic pipeline?

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Antimicrobial Stewardship/Statewide Antibiogram. Felicia Matthews Senior Consultant, Pharmacy Specialty BD MedMined Services

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Other Beta - lactam Antibiotics

Rise of Resistance: From MRSA to CRE

Recommendations for Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Restrictive Interventions in Acute Hospitals in Ireland

Is biocide resistance already a clinical problem?

Consequences of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria. Antimicrobial Resistance. Molecular Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance. Topics to be Covered

MID 23. Antimicrobial Resistance. Consequences of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria. Molecular Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial Resistance Acquisition of Foreign DNA

ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing microorganisms; state of the art. Laurent POIREL

The β- Lactam Antibiotics. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The University of Jordan November 2018

Anaerobe bakterier og resistens. Ulrik Stenz Justesen Klinisk Mikrobiologisk Afdeling Odense Universitetshospital Odense, Denmark

Protocol for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Urinary Isolates in Scotland

What does multiresistance actually mean? Yohei Doi, MD, PhD University of Pittsburgh

Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance from sentinel public hospitals, South Africa, 2013

Epidemiology and Burden of Antimicrobial-Resistant P. aeruginosa Infections

Dr. Shaiful Azam Sazzad. MD Student (Thesis Part) Critical Care Medicine Dhaka Medical College

Misericordia Community Hospital (MCH) Antimicrobial Stewardship Report. July December 2013 Second and Third Quarters 2014

5/4/2018. Multidrug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) Objectives. Outline. Define a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO)

Jump Starting Antimicrobial Stewardship

Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: How Do We Define them? How do We Stop Them?

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

April 25, 2018 Edited by: Gregory K. Perry, PharmD, BCPS-AQID

Barriers to Intravenous Penicillin Use for Treatment of Nonmeningitis

Transcription:

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, June 2011, p. 2585 2589 Vol. 55, No. 6 0066-4804/11/$12.00 doi:10.1128/aac.00891-10 Copyright 2011, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Effect of Antibiotic Treatment on Establishment and Elimination of Intestinal Colonization by KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Mice Federico Perez, 1,3 Michael J. Pultz, 1 Andrea Endimiani, 1,3 Robert A. Bonomo, 1,2,3,4,5,6 and Curtis J. Donskey 1,2,3 * Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 1 ; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VISN-10, Cleveland, Ohio 2 ; and Departments of Medicine, 3 Pharmacology, 4 Molecular Biology, 5 and Microbiology, 6 Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio Received 29 June 2010/Returned for modification 8 October 2010/Accepted 14 March 2011 An understanding of the impact of antibiotics on the intestinal reservoir of KPC carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is important to prevent its emergence. We used a mouse model to examine the effect of antibiotic treatment on the establishment and elimination of intestinal colonization with KPC-Kp. Mice (10 per group) received subcutaneous antibiotics daily for 8 days. On day 3 of treatment, 10 3 CFU of KPC-Kp was given orogastrically, and concentrations of KPC-Kp in stool were monitored. Additional experiments assessed the effects of antibiotic treatment on concentrations of total anaerobes and Bacteroides spp. in stool and the efficacy of orogastric gentamicin and polymyxin E in suppressing KPC-Kp colonization. Of four antibiotics with minimal activity against the KPC-Kp test strain (MIC > 16 g/ml), those that suppressed total anaerobes and bacteroides (i.e., clindamycin and piperacillin-tazobactam) promoted colonization by KPC-Kp (P < 0.001), whereas agents that did not suppress total anaerobes or bacteroides (i.e., ciprofloxacin and cefepime) did not (P 0.35). Of two agents with moderate activity against the KPC-Kp test strain, ertapenem (MIC, 4 g/ml) did not promote colonization by KPC-Kp, whereas tigecycline (MIC, 3 g/ml) did (P < 0.001), despite not reducing levels of total anaerobes or bacteroides. Orogastric treatment with gentamicin and polymyxin E suppressed KPC-Kp to undetectable levels in the majority of mice. These data suggest that antibiotics that disturb the intestinal anaerobic microflora and lack significant activity against KPC-Kp promote colonization by this organism. The administration of nonabsorbed oral antibiotics may be an effective strategy to suppress colonization with KPC-Kp. The emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains with decreased susceptibility to carbapenems is a significant threat to hospitalized patients worldwide (19). Resistance to carbapenems in these organisms is most frequently mediated by K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), a class A -lactamase that also confers resistance to broad-spectrum cephalosporins and commercially available -lactam/ -lactamase inhibitor combinations (24). KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) strains often harbor resistance determinants against several other classes of antimicrobials, including aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, resulting in truly multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms (12). Given the paucity of antimicrobial options available, infections caused by KPC-Kp pose a tremendous therapeutic challenge and are associated with poor clinical outcomes (20). Therefore, the prevention and control of KPC-Kp have become a priority (26). A key factor in the epidemiology of many nosocomial pathogens is their ability to colonize the intestinal tract of humans. Antibiotics that select for resistant strains and eliminate competing flora, therefore nullifying colonization resistance, facilitate intestinal colonization (6). For example, for patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), treatment with antianaerobic antibiotics that lack inhibitory activity * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, 10701 East Blvd., Cleveland, OH 44106. Phone: (216) 791-3800, ext. 5103. Fax: (216) 231-3482. E-mail: curtisd123@yahoo.com. Published ahead of print on 21 March 2011. against VRE results in the promotion of high-density colonization (7). By the same token, the existence of an intestinal reservoir of nosocomial pathogens also poses an opportunity for intervention, if established intestinal colonization can be eliminated. Efforts to limit the transmission of KPC-Kp strains are focusing on basic and enhanced infection control measures (2). The role of the intestinal reservoir of KPC-Kp and its modulation by antibiotics remain largely unexplored. In this study we used a previously validated mouse model to examine the effect of antibiotics on the establishment and elimination of intestinal colonization with KPC-Kp (13). (This work was previously presented at the 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 12 to 14 September 2009 [20a]). MATERIALS AND METHODS Mice. The experimental protocol was approved by the Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center s institutional animal care committee. Female CF1 mice (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were used in all experiments. The mice were individually housed and weighed between 25 and 30 g. Strain. We studied a thoroughly characterized strain of K. pneumoniae, VA- 367 (8, 9, 25). This clinical isolate is genetically related to the KPC-Kp strain circulating in the Eastern United States. Characterization of the resistance mechanisms in K. pneumoniae VA-367 with PCR and DNA sequence analysis revealed the presence of bla KPC-3, bla TEM-1, bla SHV-11, and bla SHV-12 as well as qnrb19 and aac(6 )-lb. Additionally, PCR and DNA sequencing revealed disruptions in the coding sequences of the following outer membrane protein genes: ompk35, ompk36, and ompk37. Table 1 summarizes the results of antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) performed with the agar dilution method and interpreted according to current recommendations from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (4a). A modified Hodge test was performed, according to a 2585

2586 PEREZ ET AL. ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. TABLE 1. Antibiotic susceptibility and resistance profile of Klebsiella pneumoniae strain VA-367 Antibiotic MIC ( g/ml) Interpretation c Piperacillin-tazobactam 512 R Tigecycline a,b 3 I Ertapenem 4 I (R) d Ciprofloxacin 32 R Cefepime 16 R Gentamicin 1 S Polymyxin E a 1.5 S Imipenem 2 S (R) d Meropenem 1 S (R) d a AST was done with an Etest (for all others, the agar dilution method was used). b AST results interpreted according to FDA criteria (for all others, 2010 CLSI criteria were used [4a]). c R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible. d A modified Hodge test suggested the presence of carbapenemase. method described previously by Anderson et al. (1), with ertapenem, meropenem, and imipenem. Tigecycline and polymyxin E were evaluated by Etest susceptibility assays (AB biomérieux, Solna, Sweden). Results for tigecycline were interpreted as suggested by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and according to CLSI recommendations (criteria for Pseudomonas) for polymyxin E. Effect of subcutaneous antibiotics on establishment of colonization. An initial set of experiments was carried out to determine the effect of subcutaneous antibiotics on the establishment of colonization with KPC-Kp VA-367. Mice (10 per group) were assigned to the following treatment groups: clindamycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, tigecycline, ertapenem, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, and normal saline (controls). All antibiotics were administered subcutaneously once each day for 8 days at doses based on the daily dose recommended for human adults (in mg per kg of body weight), as follows: clindamycin at 1.4 mg/day, piperacillin-tazobactam at 8 mg/day, tigecycline at 0.05 mg/day, ertapenem at 0.5 mg/day, cefepime at 2 mg/day, and ciprofloxacin at 0.25 mg/day. On the third day of the administration of the antibiotic, 10 3 CFU of KPC-Kp VA-367 diluted in 0.5 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was administered by orogastric gavage using a stainless-steel feeding tube (Perfektum; Popper & Sons, New Hyde Park, NY). Stool samples were collected 1, 4, 6, and 11 days after the administration of KPC-Kp in order to measure the concentration of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. Stool samples ( 100 mg diluted in 800 ml of PBS) were plated onto MacConkey agar with and without 0.5 g/ml of imipenem, and the number of CFU per gram of stool was determined. Effect of subcutaneous antibiotic treatment on indigenous intestinal microflora. Mice (n 8 per group) received daily subcutaneous antibiotic treatment as described above. Stool samples were collected after 5 days of treatment to assess the effects of the antibiotics on the stool microflora and to measure antibiotic levels in stool. To assess the effects on the microflora, fresh stool samples were diluted in prereduced PBS and plated onto Enterococcosel agar, MacConkey agar, Brucella agar, and Bacteroides bile-esculin agar (Becton Dickinson) to measure concentrations of enterococci, total and facultative Gramnegative bacilli, total anaerobes, and Bacteroides spp., respectively. Cultures of total anaerobes and Bacteroides spp. were performed inside an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratories). The lower limits of detection were 4 log 10 CFU/g of stool for total anaerobes and 2 log 10 CFU/g of stool for bacteroides. Bioassay for concentrations of antibiotics in stool. The concentrations of antibiotics in stool were determined by an agar diffusion assay with Escherichia coli (for piperacillin-tazobactam, tigecycline, ertapenem, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin) or Clostridium perfringens (for clindamycin) as the indicator strain (18). The limit of detection was 1 g/g of feces. Orogastric antibiotics and elimination of KPC-Kp intestinal colonization. Additional experiments were performed to examine whether the orogastric administration of antibiotics resulted in the elimination or persistence of colonization with KPC-Kp VA-367. Mice were treated with subcutaneous clindamycin to reduce the normal intestinal flora 1 day before receiving 10 4 CFU of KPC-Kp VA-367 by orogastric gavage, and the mice continued to receive subcutaneous clindamycin every other day for 7 days. Concurrently, for 7 days after orogastric gavage with KPC-Kp, mice received orogastric normal saline (control group), gentamicin at 6 times (0.9 mg/day) and 12 times (1.8 mg/day) the humanequivalent dose (in milligrams per kilogram of body weight), and polymyxin E at 6 times and 12 times the human-equivalent dose (1.02 mg/day and 2.04 mg/day, respectively). An additional dose of subcutaneous clindamycin was administered 20 days after the administration of KPC-Kp VA-367 to assess whether low levels of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae were present that could be augmented by the elimination of the anaerobic microflora. Stool samples were collected at baseline and at 3, 6, 8, 11, 16, and 21 days after KPC-Kp VA-367 was given by gavage. Statistical analysis. Data analyses were performed with the use of Stata software (version 6.0; Stata, College Station, TX). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the groups, with P values adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Scheffe correction. For the assessment of the effect of antibiotics on the elimination of intestinal microflora, a Student s t test was used to compare mean densities during treatment with baseline densities. RESULTS Effect of subcutaneous antibiotics on establishment of colonization. Data for the effects of different antibiotic treatments on the establishment of intestinal colonization with KPC-Kp VA-367 are shown in Fig. 1. Clindamycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and tigecycline promoted the overgrowth of carbapenemresistant K. pneumoniae (P 0.001 in comparison to saline controls). In contrast, ertapenem, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin FIG. 1. Effect of subcutaneous antibiotic administration on the establishment of intestinal colonization with KPC-Kp in mice. Mice received 10 3 CFU of KPC-Kp strain VA-367 by orogastric gavage on day 0. Subcutaneous doses of antibiotics equal to human doses on a milligram-perkilogram basis were administered from 2 days prior to 5 days after the administration of bacteria (n 10 mice per antibiotic treatment group). Densities of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae are shown for days 0, 1, 4, 6, and 11. If carbapenem-resistant organisms were not detected in the stool, the lower limit of detection ( 2 log 10 CFU/g) was assigned. Bars represent standard errors.

VOL. 55, 2011 ANTIBIOTICS AND KPC-PRODUCING K. PNEUMONIAE IN MICE 2587 FIG. 2. Effect of antibiotic treatment on concentrations of total anaerobes and Bacteroides spp. Mice (n 8 per group) received daily subcutaneous antibiotic treatment for 5 days. Stool samples were collected on day 5, diluted in prereduced phosphate-buffered saline, and plated onto selective media to measure concentrations of total anaerobes, Bacteroides spp., facultative Gram-negative bacilli, and enterococci. Cultures of total anaerobes and Bacteroides spp. were performed inside an anaerobic chamber. The lower limits of detection were 4 log 10 CFU/g of stool for total anaerobes and 2 log 10 CFU/g of stool for bacteroides. Error bars represent standard errors. did not promote overgrowth (P 0.35 in comparison to saline controls). After the discontinuation of the antibiotics that promoted colonization (day 5), the concentrations of KPC-Kp VA-367 in stool decreased. Effect of subcutaneous antibiotic treatment on indigenous intestinal microflora. Data for the effects of antibiotic treatment on the stool microflora are shown in Fig. 2. In comparison to saline controls, clindamycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ertapenem resulted in significant reductions in concentrations of total anaerobes and Bacteroides spp. (P 0.001), whereas tigecycline, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin did not (P 0.09). With the exception of clindamycin and cefepime, each of the antibiotics resulted in significant reductions in numbers of facultative Gram-negative bacilli (P 0.001). Piperacillin-tazobactam significantly reduced concentrations of enterococci in stool (P 0.001), whereas the other agents did not (P 0.23). Concentrations of antibiotics in stool. The mean concentrations of the antibiotics in stool were 48.0 g/g (range, 12 to 250 g/g) for clindamycin, 46.5 g/g (range, 0 to 125 g/g) for piperacillin-tazobactam, 3.6 g/g (range, 0 to 12 g/g) for tigecycline, 12.5 g/g (range, 0 to 64 g/g) for ertapenem, 0 g/g (not detected in any samples) for cefepime, and 126.5 g/g (range, 64 to 612 g/g) for ciprofloxacin. Orogastric antibiotics and elimination of KPC-Kp intestinal colonization. The orogastric administration of polymyxin E and gentamicin resulted in the suppression of colonization with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (Fig. 3). All the regi- FIG. 3. Effect of antibiotics on elimination of intestinal colonization with KPC-Kp in mice. Mice received 10 4 CFU of KPC-Kp strain VA-367 by orogastric gavage on day 0. From days 1 through 7, control mice (n 4) received orogastric normal saline, and treatment groups received orogastric polymyxin E at 6 (n 6) or 12 (n 6) the human-equivalent dose (mg/kg) and gentamicin at 6 (n 5) or 12 (n 4) the human-equivalent dose. Subcutaneous clindamycin was administered to all groups on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 20 of intestinal colonization with VA-367. The densities of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae in stool samples from days 0, 3, 6, 8, 11, 16, and 21 are presented. If the pathogens were not detected in stool, the lower limit of detection ( 2.5 log 10 CFU/g) was assigned (shown as a line on the graph). Arrows indicate the subcutaneous injection of clindamycin.

2588 PEREZ ET AL. ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. mens, except for polymyxin E at 6 times the human dose, resulted in up to 5-log declines in the density of carbapenemresistant K. pneumoniae in stool. After stopping treatment (day 7), rebound overgrowth was not seen for any of the treatment groups (including the controls). Rechallenge with subcutaneous clindamycin 20 days after the initial administration of bacteria resulted in relapse (approximately a 2-log increase) of colonization in all of the mice in the lower-dose polymyxin E group and in a subset of the mice in the control group (2/4 mice), the low-dose gentamicin group (2/5), and the high-dose gentamicin group (1/4). In contrast, mice treated with highdose polymyxin E did not have carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae detectable in their stool samples on day 21 after rechallenge with clindamycin. DISCUSSION Our findings suggest that antibiotics that inhibit the anaerobic intestinal microflora and have limited activity against KPC-Kp may promote the establishment of intestinal colonization with that organism. This is epitomized by clindamycin, which resulted in the highest levels of intestinal colonization with KPC-Kp. Clindamycin achieves high levels in stool, causes a marked suppression of the anaerobic microflora of the colon, and has no direct bactericidal activity against the Enterobacteriaceae (15). Piperacillin-tazobactam also promoted colonization, consistent with the high concentrations achieved in stool, the inhibition of the anaerobic microflora, and its limited activity against the KPC-Kp test strain (MIC, 512 g/ml). In contrast, we previously demonstrated that piperacillin-tazobactam inhibits the establishment of colonization by extended-spectrum- -lactamase (ESBL)-producing K. pneumoniae strains that exhibit much lower MICs against this antibiotic (22). In human volunteers, piperacillin-tazobactam achieved levels in stool (range, 1.2 to 276 g/g) that were similar to the levels in mice and inhibited the anaerobic intestinal microflora (17). Tigecycline and ertapenem both have moderate in vitro activity against the KPC-Kp test strain (MICs, 3 and 4 g/ml, respectively), and both may cause a significant disruption of the anaerobic microflora of the colon of healthy humans (18, 21). Notably, tigecycline did not inhibit total anaerobes or bacteroides in the current study; tigecycline also did not reduce numbers of total anaerobes or bacteroides in human volunteers but caused a marked suppression of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli (18). In the current study, tigecycline promoted a significant overgrowth of KPC-Kp, but ertapenem did not. This discrepancy may be related to the fact that ertapenem achieves higher levels in the intestinal tract than tigecycline (mean concentrations in the current study, 12.5 versus 3.6 g/g, respectively; mean concentrations in stool samples of human volunteers on day 8 of treatment, 32.7 versus 5.6 g/g, respectively) (18, 21), thereby providing sufficient levels of drug to inhibit the establishment of colonization. Of note, healthy human subjects treated with tigecycline developed a significant overgrowth of tigecycline-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (18). In this model, two antibiotics with limited impacts on the anaerobic intestinal microflora (cefepime and ciprofloxacin) did not cause an overgrowth of KPC-Kp, even though K. pneumoniae VA-367 was highly resistant to these agents. These results are in concordance with data from previous studies using animal models which showed that antibiotics that do not disrupt the anaerobic microflora may be less likely to promote colonization with MDR Gram-negative bacteria (6, 23). In humans, stool concentrations of cefepime have been estimated to be extremely low, while concentrations of ciprofloxacin vary widely (from undetectable to 858 g/g) (4, 28). These concentrations are similar to the levels that we detected in the stool of mice. Our observations also suggest that the orogastric administration of antibiotics may play a role in the elimination of colonization with KPC-Kp. We found reductions of the density of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae in the stool of mice treated with gentamicin and with polymyxin E. These results are especially promising because rebound was not seen after treatment with these antibiotics was stopped. Furthermore, recolonization occurred only for a minority of antibiotictreated mice (3/13 mice), even after rechallenging with antianaerobic antibiotics, and did not occur at all when mice were treated with high-dose polymyxin E. The conclusions derived from this model are limited by the intrinsic physiological differences between mice and humans that may result in disparate microbiological and pharmacological responses. The antibiotic dosages and dosing frequency that were used do not mimic systemic exposures in patients. However, we previously found that the administration of equivalent doses (mg/kg) to mice once or twice daily results in levels of drug in stool and effects on the intestinal microflora that are similar to those seen with healthy human volunteers (6, 22, 23). In the current study, the concentrations of antibiotics in stool samples of mice and the degree of alteration of the microflora are consistent with data from previous studies of human volunteers or patients (4, 17, 21). Furthermore, this model does not incorporate clinical factors that modify the risk of the acquisition and persistence of colonization, such as a simultaneous exposure to multiple classes of antibiotics, integrity of the skin and bowel, immune response, severity of illness, environmental contamination, and functional status. These same biases have to be considered in the interpretation of data from clinical studies assessing the effect of antibiotics on the establishment and elimination of colonization with carbapenem-resistant bacteria. Among several case-control studies that examined the effect of antibiotics on the acquisition of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae colonization in human subjects, only one focused on antianaerobic antibiotics. Such therapy, unlike therapy with carbapenems and fluoroquinolones, was not a risk factor for colonization with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (10, 11, 14, 16, 27). In contrast, a previously reported prospective study indicated that antianaerobic antibiotic therapy is associated with high-density stool colonization with strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae that are resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones (3). Similar clinical studies are needed to demonstrate whether antianaerobic regimens also contribute to colonization with carbapenem-resistant organisms. The elimination of colonization with MDR organisms in human subjects with selective oropharyngeal and/or digestive tract decontamination is both a highly studied and controversial topic. The combination of tobramycin and polymyxin E, in decontamination regimens that also include amphotericin B

VOL. 55, 2011 ANTIBIOTICS AND KPC-PRODUCING K. PNEUMONIAE IN MICE 2589 and systemic ceftazidime, results in marked decreases in the incidence of colonization with Enterobacteriaceae (5). Such approaches have not been applied specifically against carbapenem-resistant organisms. The potential emergence of polymyxin-resistant bacteria as a result of decolonization is a critical consideration given that this class of drugs represents the treatment of last resort for carbapenem-resistant organisms. In summary, our findings suggest that antibiotics that disrupt the intestinal anaerobic microflora but lack activity against KPC-Kp may promote intestinal colonization. Furthermore, the selective decontamination of the digestive tract with polymyxin E and/or aminoglycosides appears to be a promising approach to eliminate KPC-Kp from the gastrointestinal tract. The translation of these insights into the clinical arena depends on carefully designed studies with human subjects. This may lead to the development and refinement of antibiotic stewardship efforts and therapies to prevent and control carbapenemresistant K. pneumoniae. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by a merit review award from the Department of Veterans Affairs (to C.J.D.), the National Institutes of Health (grants RO1-AI63517 and RO3-AI081036 to R.A.B.), the Steris Corporation (to R.A.B. and F.P.), and the VISN-10 Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (to C.J.D. and R.A.B.). REFERENCES 1. Anderson, K. F., et al. 2007. Evaluation of methods to identify the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2723 2725. 2. Anonymous. 2009. Guidance for control of infections with carbapenemresistant or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in acute care facilities. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 58:256 260. 3. Bhalla, A., et al. 2003. Antianaerobic antibiotic therapy promotes overgrowth of antibiotic-resistant, gram-negative bacilli and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 24:644 649. 4. Brismar, B., C. Edlund, A. S. Malmborg, and C. E. Nord. 1990. Ciprofloxacin concentrations and impact of the colon microflora in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:481 483. 4a.CLSI. 2010. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 20th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S20. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 5. de Smet, A. M., et al. 2009. Decontamination of the digestive tract and oropharynx in ICU patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 360:20 31. 6. Donskey, C. J. 2006. Antibiotic regimens and intestinal colonization with antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43(Suppl. 2):S62 S69. 7. Donskey, C. J., et al. 2000. Effect of antibiotic therapy on the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 343:1925 1932. 8. Endimiani, A., et al. 2008. Presence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates possessing blakpc in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:2680 2682. 9. Endimiani, A., Y. Choudhary, and R. A. Bonomo. 2009. In vitro activity of NXL104 in combination with beta-lactams against Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing KPC carbapenemases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:3599 3601. 10. Falagas, M. E., et al. 2007. Risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: a matched case control study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:1124 1130. 11. Gasink, L. B., P. H. Edelstein, E. Lautenbach, M. Synnestvedt, and N. O. Fishman. 2009. Risk factors and clinical impact of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 30:1180 1185. 12. Hirsch, E. B., and V. H. Tam. Detection and treatment options for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs): an emerging cause of multidrug-resistant infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65:1119 1125. 13. Hoyen, C. K., N. J. Pultz, D. L. Paterson, D. C. Aron, and C. J. Donskey. 2003. Effect of parenteral antibiotic administration on establishment of intestinal colonization in mice by Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3610 3612. 14. Hussein, K., et al. 2009. Carbapenem resistance among Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: risk factors, molecular characteristics, and susceptibility patterns. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 30:666 671. 15. Kager, L., L. Liljeqvist, A. S. Malmborg, and C. E. Nord. 1981. Effect of clindamycin prophylaxis on the colonic microflora in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 20:736 740. 16. Kwak, Y. G., et al. 2005. Risk factors for the acquisition of carbapenemresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae among hospitalized patients. Microb. Drug Resist. 11:165 169. 17. Nord, C. E., B. Brismar, B. Kasholm-Tengve, and G. Tunevall. 1993. Effect of piperacillin/tazobactam treatment on human bowel microflora. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 31(Suppl. A):61 65. 18. Nord, C. E., E. Sillerstrom, and E. Wahlund. 2006. Effect of tigecycline on normal oropharyngeal and intestinal microflora. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3375 3380. 19. Nordmann, P., G. Cuzon, and T. Naas. 2009. The real threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Lancet Infect. Dis. 9:228 236. 20. Patel, G., S. Huprikar, S. H. Factor, S. G. Jenkins, and D. P. Calfee. 2008. Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection and the impact of antimicrobial and adjunctive therapies. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 29:1099 1106. 20a.Perez, F., M. J. Pultz, A. Endimiani, R. A. Bonomo, and C. J. Donskey. 2009. Abstr. 49th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. B-1331. 21. Pletz, M. W., et al. 2004. Ertapenem pharmacokinetics and impact on intestinal microflora, in comparison to those of ceftriaxone, after multiple dosing in male and female volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:3765 3772. 22. Pultz, M. J., and C. J. Donskey. 2007. Effects of imipenem-cilastatin, ertapenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ceftriaxone treatments on persistence of intestinal colonization by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 3044 3045. 23. Pultz, M. J., M. M. Nerandzic, U. Stiefel, and C. J. Donskey. 2008. Emergence and acquisition of fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative bacilli in the intestinal tracts of mice treated with fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:3457 3460. 24. Queenan, A. M., and K. Bush. 2007. Carbapenemases: the versatile betalactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20:440 458. 25. Rice, L. B., et al. 2008. The KQ element, a complex genetic region conferring transferable resistance to carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:3427 3429. 26. Schwaber, M. J., and Y. Carmeli. 2008. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a potential threat. JAMA 300:2911 2913. 27. Schwaber, M. J., et al. 2008. Predictors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae acquisition among hospitalized adults and effect of acquisition on mortality. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:1028 1033. 28. van Ogtrop, M. L., H. F. Guiot, H. Mattie, and R. van Furth. 1991. Modulation of the intestinal flora of mice by parenteral treatment with broadspectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:976 982.