Simplified Rations for Farm Chickens

Similar documents
P O U LTOS CIE N G E

Wheat and Wheat By-Products for Laying Hens

Oregon State Agricultural College Extension Service. Corvallis, Oregon. Chick Brooding. (Revision of Bulletin 435) 0. S. C.

Chick Brooding. 0. S. C Brooder House. Oregon State Agricultural College. Extension Service CORVALLIS, OREGON

EFFECT OF LENGTH OF STORAGE OF MIXED FEED ON THE GROWTH RATE OF CHICKS

Feeding for Egg Production

THE LAYING FLOCK VIRGINIA 4-H CLUB SERIES. AGIUCU LTUJiAL EXTENSION SERVICE OF V. P. I., BLACKSBURG, VA.

Feeding LAYING HENS H. E. COSBY. Oregon State System of Higher Education. Federal Cooperative Extension Service Oregon State College Corvallis

LI B RAR.Y OF THE U N IVER.SITY OF 1LLI NOIS

EGG production of turkeys is not important

FISH meal has already been established

TYPES HOUSES. j4 LAYING HENS LIBR APN APRIL BULLETIN No. 261 AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

Unit C: Poultry Management. Lesson 2: Feeding, Management and Equipment for Poultry

THE EFFECT OF INADEQUATE RATIONS ON THE PRODUCTION AND HATCHABILITY OF EGGS

Laying Hens OREGON STATE LIPRARY OCT Oregon State System of Higher Education

ON COMMERCIAL poultry farms during

How Chicks Grow the First Year

Unit D: Egg Production. Lesson 4: Producing Layers

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Chick Brooding. and Rearing FRANK L. KNOWLTON. Oregon State System of Higher Education Federal Cooperative Extension Service Oregon State College

EFFECT OF CALCIUM ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE EGGS AND CARCASS OF LAYING HENS.

Raising Chicks at a Profit

Returns. Costs and. '2e IOe4teue eaze9a.e. M. H. Becker. May Station Bulletin 559. Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College

THE POULTRY ENTERPRISE ON KANSAS FARMS

MARKET TURKEYS. eesie/rais. /Y \Labor/ Poult. -n-' (Circular of lnformafioñ493 April Edgar A. Hyer. Oregon State College

Ecochicks Poultry Limited

DAM (1929) as reported by Cheney

Effect of Calcium Level of the Developing and Laying Ration on Hatchability of Eggs and on Viability and Growth Rate of Progeny of Young Pullets 1

Chick Brooding. and Rearing. J. E. Parker. N. L. Bennion

FEEDING CHINESE RINGNECK PHEASANTS FOR EFFICIENT REPRODUCTION. Summary *

Dubbing Production--Bred Single--Comb White Leghorns

All-night Light for Layers

Checking Out Chickens

COSTS and RETURNS to COMMERCIAL EGG PRODUCERS. a the ALABAMA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. BULLETIN No.

Quail farming. Introduction to quail farming. Housing management of quails. Advantages of quail farming. 1. Deep litter system. 2.

1 HESE leseons have covered three important subjects in poultry-

Sand and Sage Round-Up MARKET CHICKEN STUDY GUIDE Junior and Intermediate Division (8-13 years of age as of December 31)

North Central Regional Extension Publication 235. Feeding Ewes

M housing facilities. This does not mean that an expensive

H POULTRY PROJECT

Chapter 6 Breeder flock management

Summary of Content and Teaching Strategies. Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this. Unit E: Other Poultry

FFA Poultry Career Development Event 2000 Poultry Judging Contest Arkansas State FFA Judging Contest

Late pregnancy nutrition the key to flock profitability

Reprinted August 19SS. Extension 4-H Bulletin 22. Mtf. ~~p,govs FHB. 4-H Poultry Proiect

UNCLASSIFIED AD DEFENSE DOCUMENTATION CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CAMERON STATION, ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA UNCLASSI[FIED

Chick Care: His Life is In your Hands

ATTEMPTS to control on a practical

The effect of choice-feeding from 7 weeks of age on the production characteristics of laying hens

Feeding Young Chickens

Protein Content of Concentrates for Turkeys

THE LIBRARY OF THE JUN 2219; 9 U;~IVER~:TY 0:= ILUNO.S

CC44 Poultry can Help Win

Effect of EM on Growth, Egg Production and Waste Characteristics of Japanese Quail Abstract Introduction Experimental Procedures

MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES PARENT STOCK

Unidentified Factors in Turkey Nutrition Affecting Hatchability and Progeny Growth 1

The Chick Hatchery Industry in Indiana

THE INFLUENCE OF SOME FACTORS ON THE HATCHABILITY OF THE HEN S EGG

Circular No Brooding and Feeding Chicks

POULTRY CLUB MEMBERS. Circular 452

THE production of turkey hatching

Case Study: SAP Implementation in Poultry (Hatcheries) Industry

4-H Poultry: Unit 1. The Egg Flock For an egg-producing flock, select one of these birds: production-type Rhode Island Red Leghorn hybrids sex-link

Riverside County 4-H

Boys' and Girls' Club Work: Poulry Club Record Book

Henry County 4H Dog Club Canine Nutrition and Wellbeing

THE GROWTH OF CHICKENS IN CONFINEMENT.

Unit C: Field Records. Lesson 3: Poultry Production and Record Keeping

Some Problems Concerning the Development of a Poultry Meat Industry in Australia

CHICKENS 101 BIOLOGY (ANATOMY, BREEDS, DEVELOPMENT, & REPRODUCTION)

EDUCATION AND PRODUCTION. Layer Performance of Four Strains of Leghorn Pullets Subjected to Various Rearing Programs

Help! My Chickens are Molting

EC1410 Essentials in Turkey Raising : Questions and Answers

EC1481 Revised with no date The Flock Owner's Part in Pullorum Eradication

History of the North Carolina Layer Tests. Detailed Description of Housing and Husbandry Changes Made From through 2009

Feeding Sheep. Steven H. Umberger*

Raising Pastured Poultry in Texas. Kevin Ellis NCAT Poultry Specialist

EC1401 Revised 1929 Care and Feeding of Baby Chicks

Animal Care & Selection

1T& R.AR.Y OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS' G30.7. UGb. cop AGRICULTURE

Local Grains and Free-Choice Feeding of Organic Layer Hens on Pasture at UBC Farm Introduction

Agricultural Extensi?n Se:;ice University of Californi County of Orange

FFA Poultry Career Development Event 2004 NEO Aggie Day. 1. With regard to egg storage, which of the following statements is FALSE?

MAXIMIZING FERTILITY WITH ROOSTER MANAGEMENT. Jeanna L. Wilson University of Georgia

Poultry Skillathon 2017

Training Handbook. Managing Village Chickens. Lukautim Ol Rekot Na Buk Bilong Bisnis. Integrated Agriculture Training Program

A SECOND POULTRY SURVEY IN KANSAS

Farmer Skill & Knowledge Checklist: Poultry Meat Production

Performance of Broiler Breeders as Affected by Body Weight During the Breeding Season 1

COMMON SENSE IN POULTRY FEEDING

THE FEATHER REPORT The Feather Report

EC1481 The Flock Owner's Part in Pullorum Eradication

~ ~ \\..\..\~\) \ :'{ c:jlmanti&!for . '{ \)\ \.\~ POULTRY CLUB. M MB RS By. I. PILCHARD. And JOHN VAND RVORT

A Guide to Commercial Poultry Production in Florida 1

The Effect of Vitamin E on Egg Production, Hatchability and Humoral Immune Response of Chickens. ROBERT P. TENGERDY Department of Microbiology AND

FEED! CHOOSE THE RIGHT

Palatability, creep feeding and fattening studies with lambs by Charles E Montgomery

ECONOMICS OF WINTER MILKING FOR MEDIUM TO LARGE DAIRY SHEEP OPERATIONS. Yves M. Berger

^ VJ I ^ b 2H 50< ; Brooding Chicks >» \ Extension Circular 854 Revised June 1983 ORGGON STATG UNIVGRSITY GXTGNSION SGRVICG

Transcription:

CIRCULAR 66 (Reprinted August 936) JUNE 934 Simplified Rations for Farm Chickens By D. F. KING Assistant Professor Poultry Husbandry G. A. TROLLOPE Professor Poultry Husbandry AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION OF THE ALABAMA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE M. J. FUNCHESS, Director AUBURN

Simplified Rations for Farm Chickens FEED cost constitutes approximately sixty per cent of the total cost of poultry production; therefore, it is important that this cost be reduced as low as possible, consistent with good results. Rations generally used in feeding chickens consist of complicated mixtures of numerous ingredients, some of which have been added without scientific knowledge of what is necessary for the proper nutrition of chickens. As a result a number of ingredients have been used in the hope of avoiding deficiencies. Rations prepared according to complicated formulas are usually expensive and confusing to farmers and often embody certain feedstuffs that are not readily available. If those feeds that can be produced satisfactorily and economically on Alabama farms are found to be adequate for growth and egg production, material savings in the cost of feed may be effected by their use. The purpose of this circular is to present the results of experiments conducted at the Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station in which a number of simple rations were used for chickens. The efficiency of these simple rations was compared with a complicated ration which was used as a control. Results of these experiments should be of value to those who wish to reduce the cost of producing poultry by utilizing feed products grown on the farm. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS The experiment was divided into three periods: the brooding period covering the first eight weeks, the growing period extending from eight to twenty weeks, and the laying period covering the first six months of egg production. Brooding Period.-Day-old Single Comb White Leghorn chicks of good breeding were used in this experiment. The flock from which the chicks were produced was tested for pullorum disease and rigidly selected for vigor. Permanent identification of chicks in the various lots was assured by toe marking each chick. Each lot contained 350 chicks in 93 and 00 chicks in 932. All chicks were uniformly housed and brooded in confinement. Each lot of chicks was allowed to run on an 8 by 0-foot, wire-floored porch, which permitted exposure to direct sunshine and at the same time minimized the possibilities of contact with disease-producing organisms. The chicks in all lots were fed all-mash rations which were kept before them continuously in small wooden hoppers. They were watered in fruit jar drinking fountains for the first few days and then in partially covered galvanized troughs. The control group of chicks, Lot, was fed one of the standard complex rations which could be depended upon to produce satisfactory

results. Lots 2 to 8 were fed simplified rations. of the rations fed in this experiment were: LOT. Yellow corn meal Wheat shorts Meat scrap Ground oat groats Dried buttermilk Alfalfa meal Linseed oil meal Bone meal- - Charcoal -- - - S a lt -- - - -- -- - -- - - - - Water to drink LOT 2. Yellow corn meal Bone meal-- - Marble grit S a lt -- - - - - - - - - - - - LOT 3. White corn meal ----- Bone m eal ----------- M arble grit ---------- S a lt - --- -- -- - -- -- --- - LOT 4. Yellow corn meal----- Wheat shorts -------- Bone m eal------------ M arble grit---------- S a lt - ------------ - 45 5 -- 2 -_20 0 22 2 _00 55.00 5 -- 5 80 20 55 LOT 5. White corn meal Wheat shorts-------- Bone m eal ----------- M arble grit---------- Salt LOT 6. Yellow corn meal----- Wheat shorts-------- M eat scrap ---------- Bone m eal----------- S a lt -- --- - --- - -- -- -- - Water to drink LOT 7. Yellow corn meal----- Ground oats --------- M eat scrap ---------- Bone meal ------- S a lt - -- ---- - -- -- -- -- - Water to drink LOT 8. Yellow corn meal-- Ground oats------ Bone meal-------- Marble grit -- _--.- S alt ------ - --- The formulas 80 20 55 In formulating the foregoing rations, except for Lot, every effort was made to reduce the number of ingredients and to use those feeds that were most likely to be available on the farm, or readily accessible at local feed stores. All of the rations were calculated to contain approximately the same mineral balance and about 6 per cent crude protein. Growing Period.-Five Lots,, 2, 4, 5, and 5, were carried through the growing and laying periods. The other lots were unsatisfactory and were discontinued at the close of the brooding period. The cockerels were removed from each lot at eight weeks of age, and the pullets placed in laying houses where they remained throughout the experiment. Each lot continued to receive the same ration which they had received during the brooding period except that whole corn was given as a scratch grain to the simplified-ration lots. Lots receiving yellow corn 70 20 6 3 75-5 63-85 5 -- 5 5 --

meal in the mash were given yellow corn as a scratch grain, and lots which received white corn meal in the mash were given white corn as a scratch grain. Lot, the control group, received a scratch grain consisting of equal parts of cracked yellow corn and whole wheat, and was changed from the complicated starting mash to a complicated growing mash consisting of 30 pounds yellow corn meal, 20 pounds ground oat groats, 5 pounds wheat shorts, 0 pounds wheat bran, 5 pounds alfalfa meal, 5 pounds meat scrap, 7 pounds dried buttermilk, 3 pounds bone meal, 3 pounds linseed meal, pound charcoal, and pound fine salt. Laying Period.-The simplified-ration lots continued to receive the same rations. Lot was changed from the growing mash to a standard complicated laying mash consisting of 33 pounds yellow corn meal, 30 pounds wheat shorts, 4 pounds dried buttermilk, 5 pounds meat scrap, 5 pounds fish meal, 0 pounds gluten feed, 2 pounds linseed meal, 2 pounds alfalfa leaf meal, 4 pounds soybean meal, /3 pounds limestone, and 2/3 of a pound bone meal. Lot continued to receive the scratch grain consisting of equal parts cracked yellow corn and whole wheat. RESULTS Growth Rate, Feed Consumption, and Mortality During Brooding Period (8 weeks).-the data in Table show for each two-week interval the average weight per chick in each experimental lot. The weights obtained in 93 and the weights obtained in 932 are averaged and shown in Table. Table.-Average Weight of Chicks (Pounds) at 2, 4, 6, and 8 Weeks of Age. Lot No. 2 Weeks 4 Weeks 6 Weeks 8 Weeks.90.340.625.825 2.60.275.525.655 3.65.265.490.590 4.90.325.635.770 5.80.290.585.75 6.65.260.540.645 7.35.205.450.560 8.70.295.560.705 The chicks in the control group, Lot, made the best growth. The chicks in Lots 4, 5, and 8 where simplified rations were fed also made satisfactory growth. Rations fed to Lots 3 and 7 were unsatisfactory, while rations fed to Lots 2 and 6 were only fairly satisfactory. Rations containing yellow corn meal gave better growth than the same ration containing white corn meal as is indicated by comparing Lots 2 and 4 with Lots 3 and 5. The addition of wheat shorts or ground oats to a ration composed of corn meal, minerals, and skim milk increased the rate of growth considerably as is in-

dicated by comparing Lot 2 with Lot 4 and 8. Wheat shorts was a better supplement to the corn meal, minerals, and skim milk ration than ground oats. This is indicated by comparing Lots 4 and 8 with Lots 6 and 7. The first lot in each case received wheat shorts and the second received ground oats. Where meat scrap (50 per cent protein) was used as the sole source of protein supplement, either with wheat shorts or with ground oats, the rate of growth was unsatisfactory, as indicated by comparing Lot 6 with Lot 7. The amount of feed consumed per chick for the eight-week period for 93 and 932 is averaged and shown in Table 2. Table 2.-Average Feed Consumption Per Chick (Pounds). Lot No. Mash Skim milk 2.3 2.98 2.2 3 2.02 2.34 4 2.9 2.23 5 2.30 2.36 6.99 7 2.30 8 2.08 2.0 The average amount of skim milk consumed per chick to eight weeks of age was 2.25 pounds, or only a little more than one quart. There was but little difference in the amount of feed consumed in the various lots. The death rate of chicks is usually quite variable because of the number of factors that enter into their production. The percentage mortality for the eight-week period for 93 and 932 is averaged and shown in Table 3. Table 3.-Average Mortality. Lot Average per cent Lot Average per cent No. mortality No. mortality 0.0 5 8.5 2 2. 6 29.5 3 8.3 7 39.9 4 0.4 8 2.8 The lots receiving white corn meal had a higher mortality than the lots receiving yellow corn meal, as shown by comparing Lot 2 with Lot 3, and Lot 4 with Lot 5. The lots receiving ground oats had a higher mortality than the lots receiving wheat shorts, as shown by comparing Lot 4 with Lot 8, and Lot 6 with Lot 7. Meat scrap as a sole source of protein supplement gave a higher mortality than skim milk used as the only protein supplement, as shown by comparing Lot 4 with Lot 6, and Lot 8 with Lot 7. The addition of wheat shorts or ground oats to the corn meal, minerals, and skim milk ration did not change the rate of mortality, as shown by comparing Lot 2 with Lot 4 or Lot 8.

Growth Rate and Feed Consumption During Growing Period (8 to 20 weeks).-the weights of the pullets at four-week intervals during the growing period of 93 and 932 are averaged and shown in Table 4. Table 4.-Average Weight of Pullets (Pounds) at 8, 2, 6, and 20 Weeks of Age. Lot No. 8 Weeks 2 Weeks 6 Weeks 20 Weeks 2 4 5 8.825.655.770.75.705.67.33.57.40.32 2.2 2.03 2.5 2.08 2.03 2.4 2.36 2.5 2.27 2.33 The pullets in Lot made the most rapid growth to the 6th week, but those in the other lots made the most rapid growth thereafter, with the exception of the pullets in Lot 5 where the rate of growth was practically the equivalent to that in Lot. In other words, growth in Lot was more rapid for a time, but the pullets in the simplified-ration lots continued growth over a longer period, and at 20 weeks those in Lot 4 were heavier than those in the control lot. The amount of feed consumed per pullet during the growing period for 93 and 932 is averaged and shown in Table 5. Table 5.-Average Feed Consumption Per Pullet (Pounds). Lot No. Mash Grain Skim milk 2 4 5 8 8.9 6.09 6.45 6.0 5.74 2.67 2.32.69.68 2.75 5.8 22.87 8.77 5.64 The average amount of skim milk consumed per pullet during the 2-week growing period was 8.27 pounds or 2. gallons. Egg Production, Feed Consumption, and Hatchability of Eggs During Laying Period (6 months).-the rate of egg production in each lot from September to February for 93-32 and 932-33 is averaged and shown in Table 6. Table 6.-Average Number and Weight of Eggs Laid (6 Months). Lot No. Eggs laid per bird Egg weight (ounces) 58.72.799 2 63.99.855 4 67.98.876 5 62.44.862 8 56.9.890

All chicks used in this experiment in 93-32 were hatched early and went into partial molt during the fall and winter, thus causing the rate of egg production to be a little low. It will be noted that egg production from the simplified rations was in every lot, excepting Lot 8, slightly higher than that in the control lot. The egg weights, as determined by weighing all individual eggs produced by each lot once each week for the six-month period, were also slightly in favor of the simplified rations. The amount of feed consumed per pullet during the laying period for 93-32 and 932-33 is averaged and shown in Table 7. Table 7.-Average Feed Consumption Per Pullet (Pounds). Lot No. Mash Grain Skim milk 8.26 4.08 2 6.09 4.5 7.06 4 6.50 5.00 8.02 5 4.8 7.69 75.6 8 4.24 5.76 76.92 The average amount of skim milk consumed per pullet during the six-month laying period was 76.04 pounds. This is equal to about 4/2 gallons of skim milk per hundred birds per day. The total number of eggs incubated in 93 and 932, and the average percentage of fertile eggs that hatched from each lot are shown in Table 8. Table 8.-Percentage Hatchability. Lot No. No. eggs incubated hatched 246 73.75 2 362 75.5 4 379 66.60 5 304 73.45 8 255 65.80 There was but little difference in the percentage hatchability in the various lots. SUMMARY.-Simplified rations used in Lots 2, 4, 5, and 8, prepared largely of home-grown products, gave satisfactory results for farm chickens. 2.-The pullets in the simplified ration lots did not grow as fast as the pullets in the control group, but grew over a longer period, and at 20 weeks of age the pullets in Lot 4 had greater weight than those in the control group. 3.-Simplified rations used in Lots 3, 6, and 7 were unsatisfactory, as measured by growth rate and mortality. 7

4.-Yellow corn meal gave better results than white corn meal in simplified rations. 5.-Wheat shorts were superior to ground oats as a supplement to the corn meal, minerals, and skim milk ration. 6.-Skim milk as a sole protein supplement in simplified rations gave good results. 7.-Meat scrap as a sole protein supplement in simplified rations resulted in poor growth and high mortality during the brooding period. PRACTICAL APPLICATION According to results obtained in these experiments, farmers may obtain good results by feeding their chickens simple homemixed rations. The chicks fed simplified rations will probably not grow as fast as chicks fed complicated rations, but will continue to grow over a longer period and at five months of age there will be very little difference in the weight of the pullets fed simple rations and those fed complicated rations. The simplified formula to use depends upon the feeds readily available on the farm where the ration is to be fed. In general, the ration used in Lot 4 (Page 3) gave the best results; therefore, a farmer having yellow corn meal and skim milk available can, by purchasing a small amount of wheat shorts and minerals, mix a ration at a very low cash cost that will give results comparable to those obtained from standard complicated rations. Wheat shorts may be left out of the ration as in Lot 2 (Page 3), if the poultry enterprise does not justify its purchase, and the results secured will be only slightly under those obtained from Lot 4. The earlier growth will probably be slower, but the pullets at maturity should be almost as large as those which received wheat shorts. Farmers having oats available may use ground oats at the rate of 5 per cent (by weight) in the ration, as in Lot 8 (Page 3), and thereby utilize another home-grown product. The results secured by feeding this ration should be about the same as those obtained from Lot 2. In simplified rations, yellow corn meal will give much better results than white corn meal; therefore, the use of white corn meal is to be discouraged, especially when the chicks are brooded in confinement and corn meal is the only grain or by-product used. White corn meal would perhaps give satisfactory results if the chicks are allowed free range on seasonal green feeds. Meat scrap (50 per cent protein) cannot be used with satisfactory results as the sole source of protein supplement in simplified rations. Its use results in poor growth and high mortality.