UBC ANIMAL CARE COMMITTEE POLICY 004

Similar documents
University Council on Animal Care

University Council on Animal Care

Animal Use Subcommittee. Post Approval Monitoring Policy Approved: September 13, 2012 Supersedes: August 13, Goal. Mandate

ANIMAL CARE COMMITTEE

Title: Record Keeping for Regulated Animals at Oklahoma State University

Division of Research University Policy

University Animal Care Committee (UACC) Terms of Reference

ANIMAL CARE AND USE PROGRAM REVISED: NOVEMBER 20, 2014

Post Approval Monitoring : A tool to improve best practices for animal use in science

ANIMAL CARE AND USE STANDARD

Post-Approval Monitoring (PAM) Program

Goal. Scope. Animal Use Subcommittee. Post Approval Monitoring Policy Veterinary Rounds for Laboratories

Guideline on Post Approval Monitoring Program for McMaster University Animal Facilities

Continued animal holding beyond the year of certification constitutes Procedural Non-Compliance and will be treated as such.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES DIVISION OF COMPARATIVE MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA

Division or Sector: Policy Number: Vanier Animal Care Committee Terms of Reference and Animal Use Protocol

University Council on Animal Care Policies and Procedures Terms & Definitions Approval Date: 30MAY2018 Effective Date: 30MAY2018

CCAC guidelines on: the care and use of fish in research, teaching and testing

ANIMAL USE AND CARE RESEARCH ETHICS

APPLICATION FOR ANIMAL USE SECTION A - F

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

Procedure Number: AH Cage Cards 007 Revision Number: 3 Effective Date: May 2013 Expiration Date: November Purpose

MAINTAINING HEALTH AND PROCEDURE RECORDS FOR RESEARCH AND TEACHING ANIMALS

Project Protocol Number UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE &USE COMMITTEE 2002 VERTEBRATE ANIMAL USE PROTOCOL FORM

UACC Policy and Procedures on Animal Use Frequency for Teaching Animals and Resident Herds/Colonies

INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE ANIMAL PROTOCOL REVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE. Name Role on Protocol Department P. O.

IACUC Policy on Humane Endpoints in Animal Use Proposals

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) APPROVING INVESTIGATOR MANAGED USE SITES AND HOUSING AREAS

Animal Research Ethics Procedure

Iowa State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)

Drexel University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Mouse Breeding Policy

UPEI / AVC Guidelines for Categories of Invasiveness and Rest Periods for Teaching Animals

INTRODUCTION PROGRAM OF VETERINARY CARE

Guide to the Professional Practice Standard: Veterinarian-Client-Patient Relationship (VCPR)

Public consultation on Proposed Revision of the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes 2004

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE COL- 01

Regulating Animal Welfare in the EU.the EU.

ACC 101. CCAC National Workshop 2012 Presentation. Michael Baar, D.M.V. Assessment and Certification Program Director

March 16, Guide's space recommendations as a minimum while always recognizing that performance standards also must be met.

University of Nevada, Las Vegas Policy on Laboratory Animal Care and Use

Guide to Preparation of a Site Master File for Breeder/Supplier/Users under Scientific Animal Protection Legislation

Brandeis University Policy for Residential Students regarding Support Animals

Vertebrate Animal Project Rules

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE #632 ANIMAL WELFARE ASSESSMENT

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Guideline. Defining Humane Endpoints and End-stage Illness BACKGROUND. Definitions.

University of Arkansas at Monticello. ANIMAL CARE AND USE POLICY Effective September 6, 2006

Animal Care Resource Guide Veterinary Care Issue Date: August 18, 2006

Application for Approval of a Project Involving the Use of Animals, and Approval as an Investigator for the Project

CAF009. All undergraduate, graduate students, and researchers performing survival surgery on animals.

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee: Procedures. Office of Research Affairs Research Integrity and Compliance Responsible Conduct of Research

CARE AND USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH, TESTING, AND TEACHING

BIAZA Animal Transfer Policy (ATP)

Refinement Issues in Animal Research. Joanne Zurlo, PhD Institute for Laboratory Animal Research National Academy of Sciences

Using Animals in Research at PSU

lasting compassion and

LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE FOR RESEARCHERS PLANNING ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS AND PERSONS PERFORMING PROCEDURES BASIC GENERAL MODULE (LAS 301)

POSITION DETAILS. UCT Research Animal Facility (RAF)

University of Illinois at Springfield. Policies and Procedures Governing Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in Research and Teaching

Great Basin College. Student Housing. Emotional Support Animal Policy and Agreement Policy

Animal Care Resource Guide Veterinary Care Issue Date: July 17, 2007

IACUC TOWN HALL MEETING. May 27 th, 2015

Best Practices for Humane Care & High Live Release Programming

Humane EndPoints (HEP)

The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Eighth Edition

MONITORING SHEETS STEP-BY-STEP INSTRUCTIONS

PROTOCOL FOR THE HUMANE CARE AND USE OF LIVE VERTEBRATE ANIMALS

End-of-Life Care FAQ. 1 of 5 11/12/12 9:01 PM

AAALAC s Approach to Implementing the New ILAR Guide

RCVS Performance Protocol

A Guide for Lay Members of Animal Ethics Committees

Policy on the use of animals in research and education at SLU

Monthly Webinar. Tuesday 16th January 2018, 16:00. That Was The Year That Was : Selections from the 2017 Antimicrobial Stewardship Literature

Position Statements. AAALAC Position Statements & FAQs. Laboratory Animals - Definition 2013 CLASS 1. The Attending Veterinarian & Veterinary Care

The purpose of this policy is to delineate the functions, roles and responsibilities of the FAU IACUC membership.

COUNCIL GUIDELINE FOR CONSULTATION/REFERRAL OR OWNER INITIATED SECOND OPINION

Part I - Euthanasia as an Alternative to Death as an Endpoint in Rodents

ASSISTANCE ANIMAL POLICY AND AGREEMENT

Psychology Animal Facility Handbook

Aide mémoire for environmental conditions and treatment of biological models

DECISION AND SECTION 43 STATEMENT TO THE VETERINARY COUNCIL BY THE COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE: CAC Dr Alfa 1. Complaint from Miss Bravo

Regulations for the Management of Laboratory Animals. at Fujita Health University

V E T E R I N A R Y C O U N C I L O F I R E L A N D ETHICAL VETERINARY PRACTICE

Animal Welfare Assessment Transfers Checklist

Approving Investigator Managed Use Sites and Housing Areas SOP Number: PURPOSE: 2.0 SCOPE:

Animal User Group Meeting Fall Discussion Topics

DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE POLICY FOR PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE CARE FOR NON-RODENT MAMMALS

ASSESSMENT Theory and knowledge are tested through assignments and examinations.

318.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

Taimie L. Bryant * Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law. INTRODUCTION

The Children s Medical Research Institute s Lab Animal Training Program

Emotional Support Animal

Winthrop University Policy on Care and Use of Vertebrate Animals in Research and Instruction

UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA FACULTY OF VETERINARY SCIENCE ESSENTIAL COMPETENCES REQUIRED OF THE NEW VETERINARY GRADUATE

CODE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT

What we heard. Protecting the rights of people who rely on guide and service animals in Nova Scotia. Public discussion

Guideline to Supplement to Codes of Practice Greyhound Euthanasia

IACUC POLICIES, PROCEDURES, and GUIDELINES. HUMANE USE PAIN CLASSIFICATIONS (Pain Categories)

Toward a Common Swine Industry Audit

Assistance Animal Policy

Guidance Document. Veterinary Operating Instructions. Guidance re: Requirements for Authorising Veterinarians Notice.

Transcription:

UBC ANIMAL CARE COMMITTEE POLICY 004 Animal Health and Welfare Concerns: Treatment and Humane Endpoints Version Approved: May 2, 2016 1. PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to ensure that: 1) the health and welfare of animals are not negatively impacted beyond what is approved in the animal use protocol, 2) unexpected and experimentally related negative impacts on animal health and welfare are investigated, 3) proper records are kept for animals that die or that have reduced health and welfare, and 4) to establish a standardized and appropriate approach to handling animals with reduced health and welfare at all sites under the authority of the University of British Columbia s Animal Care and Use Program. 2. SCOPE: This policy applies to all animals used in teaching, testing, breeding and/or research housed in University of British Columbia animal facilities, as well as those facilities that reside at affiliated research institutes, centres and hospitals and that fall under the review of University of British Columbia s Animal Care Committee ( UBC animal facilities ). 3. DEFINITIONS: Animal Use Protocol: All proposed use of animals for research, teaching, breeding and testing is documented in an Animal Use Protocol (AUP). This AUP receives ethical review, and approval by the Animal Care Committee, before the animals are obtained and the work initiated. UBC Clinical Veterinarian: Clinical veterinarian recognized by the UBC Animal Care Committee. Health and Welfare: Although the term animal welfare can capture concerns related to health, we separate health and welfare for clarity. Health refers to biological functioning, in the sense of absence of disease or injury, and normal growth and development. Welfare refers to behaviour (performance of normal species-specific behaviours) and emotional states (lack of negative emotional sates such as fear, and pain 1. Morbidity: Diseased state, disability, or poor health due to any cause. Spontaneous Non-Experimentally Related Conditions: Conditions may arise in animals during the conduct of research that are unexpected and unrelated to the research being conducted Page 1 of 5

but negatively affect animal health and welfare. For example, occasional mortality or specific disease conditions such as spontaneous tumors can occur in breeding colonies or other normal animals. Unexpected Experimentally Related Conditions: Any effect of an experimental or teaching procedure which is not described in the protocol or anticipated during the planning of the research that negatively affects animal health and welfare. These typically include a series of events rather than a single event. Examples include: higher than expected morbidity or mortality rates resulting from complications such as recurrent post-surgical infections in multiple animals; increased numbers of animals unexpectedly reaching humane endpoint prior to experimental endpoint; unexpected change in time course and/or progression of adverse effects; stereotypical behavior that interferes with normal functioning. 4. POLICY STATEMENTS: 1. As per the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) guidelines, experiments must be designed to ensure that animals are not subjected to unnecessary pain or distress. 2. All animals that have poor health or welfare (both spontaneous non-experimentally related and unexpected experimentally related conditions) must receive standard medical or other accepted treatment or be euthanized. These animals must undergo a treatment regime commensurate with their condition. If standard veterinary treatment would affect the experimental results, the animals will be euthanized unless withholding treatment for the condition(s) is specifically approved on the Animal Use Protocol. 3. UBC clinical veterinarians are ultimately responsible for conducting diagnoses and determining appropriate treatments, control measures and/or euthanasia for clinical cases. 4. UBC clinical veterinarians will discuss any animal health or welfare concerns with the Principal Investigator to determine the most appropriate course of action. Principal investigators and their staff must comply with the veterinarian s recommendations for treatment or euthanasia. Veterinarians must do their best to accommodate the goals of the science. 5. A UBC clinical veterinarian must be available to respond to concerns about animal health or welfare at any time. 6. Animals that have reached their humane endpoint, as outlined by the approved Animal Use Protocol, must be euthanized. Only an UBC clinical veterinarian can approve exceptions. 7. The UBC clinical veterinarian must resolve any health and animal welfare concerns that cannot be readily resolved through collaborative interactions between the Principal Investigator, research team member and/or a Facility Manager. The conflict must be Page 2 of 5

resolved in a time frame appropriate to the severity of the impact on the animal and/or the risk of deterioration of an animal s welfare. 8. If the Principal Investigator or research team member cannot be reached in the case of a pressing health and welfare problem, a UBC clinical veterinarian has the authority to euthanize any animal and where deemed necessary institute measures to protect the health and welfare of that and other animals. Exceptions to this are when the Principal Investigator has pre-arranged authorization for facility staff or managers to euthanize animals at humane endpoint. 9. Individuals responsible for daily animal health observations must have the necessary ability, knowledge and skill to assess the health and welfare of animals under their care. 10. All unexpected experimentally related conditions (see definition) must be reported to the UBC clinical veterinarian designated for that facility. Individuals charged with monitoring the animals, whether facility or research staff, are responsible for reporting. 11. The facility manager must keep a record of all animals found dead or euthanized at humane endpoint (monthly facility mortality logs ), whether reported by facility staff or researchers. The intent is to detect rates of unexpected deaths above normal and flag them for further investigation. The logs must be submitted to the Post Approval Monitoring Team (PAM) and UBC clinical veterinarian monthly. 12. All unexpected experimentally related conditions must be investigated in order to understand the underlying cause/s. Investigation of unexpected deaths can include discussion with an UBC clinical veterinarian, post-mortem analysis, histopathology etc. 13. Sick animal identification, diagnosis, treatments must be documented as per the ACC Policy 017 on Monitoring and Medical Records of Animals used for Research, Teaching and Testing. Date of death or euthanasia and type of termination (found dead or euthanized) must be recorded and this information must be visible at cage/room level. 14. Each facility must have an SOP on how animal health and welfare concerns are reported to the designated lab contacts and the required response time. 15. All unexpected experimentally related conditions and associated interventions or treatments must be disclosed within the progress report of the Animal Use Protocol at annual and full protocol renewal. 16. If the health and welfare of an animal is affected and non-compliance (see Policy xx) is suspected, then the PAM veterinarian must be notified. See flow chart (Policy xx) for details of reporting. 5. RESPONSIBILITY: 1. It is the responsibility of any person involved in the care and use of animals to follow this policy. Page 3 of 5

2. It is the responsibility of Principal Investigators to adhere to the humane and experimental endpoints in his/her approved Animal Use Protocol. 3. It is the responsibility of the Principal Investigator to provide current 24-hour contact information for staff in his/her lab who will receive and respond to notifications about animals whose health and welfare is declining or who are found dead. 6. PROCEDURES: Animals found dead or with reduced health and welfare: 1. For dead animals, remove the dead animal and place the animal in a labeled bag and in a refrigerator until the investigator can be notified. If investigators have provided alternative instructions to the facility staff, then follow those instructions. 2. For dead and euthanized animals, record the identification, date of death and type of termination (found dead or euthanized) at cage level. 3. For animals with reduced health and welfare, alert the Principal Investigator or lab contact(s) and facility manager in a time frame appropriate to the severity of the condition of the animal and/or the risk of deterioration of an animal s health and welfare. 4. In the event that the Principal Investigator or lab contact cannot be reached, then facility staff should contact an UBC clinical veterinarian who will recommend appropriate treatments, control measures and/or euthanasia. Common conditions can be diagnosed and treated according to accepted UBC veterinary guidance documents. 5. All other animals under similar experimental treatments/manipulations must be closely monitored for signs of reduced health and welfare. 6. If an animal is at humane endpoint, then the animal must be euthanized (see policy statement 6 and 8). If there is uncertainty or disagreement, contact the UBC clinical veterinarian (See policy statement 7). 7. Once the Principal Investigator or lab contact has been notified about an animal with reduced health and welfare, there are time limits for their response. These time limits will reflect the severity of sickness of the animal. As an example, for rodents, the UBC Facilities: Grading System and Response Guide for Rodents, recommends the following response times: Grade 5: Euthanize within 15 minutes Grade 4: 2-hour response required Page 4 of 5

Grade 3: Response required by the end of the workday. 8. The Principal Investigator or designate should communicate with facility staff to arrange for the collection of any experimentally required samples (blood or tissue) or storage conditions of the body in the event that an animal is found dead or moribund. This allows the technical staff to procure samples and euthanize animals in a quick and humane fashion without delay. 7. REFERENCES: 1. Fraser, D. 2008. Understanding animal welfare: the science in its cultural context. Wiley- Blackwell. UK. AUTHOR: Cathy Schuppli Date: 12-15-2015. TITLE: TYPE: UBC ANIMAL CARE COMMITTEE POLICY 004. Animal Health and Welfare Concerns: Treatment and Humane Endpoints Policy IDENTIFIER: PAGE NO. 5/5 Policy - 004 VERSION NO. 2 Effective Date DR No. SOP Review Initials/ Date Changes required? (Yes/No) Description of Changes/Comment Jun-27-2007 No Reviewed (5 Year Cycle) April -- 2016 CS/ Oct 13-2015 Yes Entirely new document. April 2016 CS / April 19, 2015 Yes Edits from ACC members, changed title, redefined terms Page 5 of 5