Antibiotic Reference Laboratory, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR); August 2017

Similar documents
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella, 2016

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella, 2015

PILOT STUDY OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SHIGELLA IN NEW ZEALAND IN 1996

PROTOCOL for serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella test strains

Please distribute a copy of this information to each provider in your organization.

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory

Annual survey of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 2008

DECREASED SUSCEPTIBILITY TO ANTIMICROBIALS AMONG SHIGELLA FLEXNERI ISOLATES IN MANIPAL, SOUTH INDIA A 5 YEAR HOSPITAL BASED STUDY

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Comparative Assessment of b-lactamases Produced by Multidrug Resistant Bacteria

Surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in Australian pigs and chickens

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Helen Heffernan. Rosemary Woodhouse

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

Antimicrobial Resistance Strains

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

Research, National Health Research Institute, Zhunan, Taiwan. Received: May 1, 2008 Revised: June 4, 2008 Accepted: July 4, 2008

Defining Extended Spectrum b-lactamases: Implications of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration- Based Screening Versus Clavulanate Confirmation Testing

2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Principles and Practice of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Microbiology Technical Workshop 25 th September 2013

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

1 INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES OUTLINE OF THE SALM/CAMP EQAS

Background and Plan of Analysis

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Michael Hombach*, Guido V. Bloemberg and Erik C. Böttger

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

Twenty Years of the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) Where Are We And What Is Next?

Main objectives of the EURL EQAS s

Protocol for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Urinary Isolates in Scotland

Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Vibrio cholerae Causing Diarrohea Outbreaks in Bidar, North Karnataka, India

Laboratory determination of the susceptibility to antibiotics of bacteria isolated from aquatic animals Peter Smith

Prevalence of Extended Spectrum Beta- Lactamase Producers among Various Clinical Samples in a Tertiary Care Hospital: Kurnool District, India

Original Article. Suthan Srisangkaew, M.D. Malai Vorachit, D.Sc.

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

Study of drug resistance pattern of principal ESBL producing urinary isolates in an urban hospital setting in Eastern India

The Threat of Multidrug Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae

EARS Net Report, Quarter

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

Serodiversity and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Shigella Isolates at Gondar University Teaching Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

Key words: Campylobacter, diarrhea, MIC, drug resistance, erythromycin

Practical approach to Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and quality control

Antimicrobial resistance in Shigella - rapid increase & widening of spectrum in Andaman Islands, India

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

Species Distribution' and Antibiotic Resistance of Shigella Isolates in an Urban Community in Malaysia

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory. Tim Blackmore Microbiologist. Communicable Disease Group ESR Porirua

Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in the Province of British Columbia

APPENDIX III - DOUBLE DISK TEST FOR ESBL

Streptococcus pneumoniae. Oxacillin 1 µg as screen for beta-lactam resistance

Co-transfer of bla NDM-5 and mcr-1 by an IncX3 X4 hybrid plasmid in Escherichia coli 4

Mili Rani Saha and Sanya Tahmina Jhora. Department of Microbiology, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Mitford, Dhaka, Bangladesh

What s new in EUCAST methods?

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Focus Technologies, Inc., 1 Hilversum, The Netherlands, 2 Herndon, Virginia and 3 Franklin, Tennessee, USA

The impact of antimicrobial resistance on enteric infections in Vietnam Dr Stephen Baker

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)

Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter EURL AR activities in framework of the new EU regulation Lina Cavaco

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Annual Report: Table 1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Results for 2,488 Isolates of S. pneumoniae Collected Nationally, 2005 MIC (µg/ml)

Surveillance of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns among Shigella Species Isolated in China during the 7-Year Period of

Resistance Among Streptococcus pneumoniae: Patterns, Mechanisms, Interpreting the Breakpoints

Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2012:

Mechanism of antibiotic resistance

Prevalence of Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae Strains in Latvia

Version 1.01 (01/10/2016)

3/9/15. Disclosures. Salmonella and Fluoroquinolones: Where are we now? Salmonella Current Taxonomy. Salmonella spp.

EUCAST Expert Rules for Staphylococcus spp IF resistant to isoxazolylpenicillins

Original Article. Ratri Hortiwakul, M.Sc.*, Pantip Chayakul, M.D.*, Natnicha Ingviya, B.Sc.**

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN KENYA; What Surveillance tells us

EUCAST Subcommitee for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms (ESDReM)

Presence of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli in

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

Trends en voorkomen van resistenties bij Salmonella, Campylobacter en E. coli geïsoleerd uit de voeding

ESCHERICHIA COLI RESISTANCE AND GUT MICROBIOTA PROFILE IN PIGS RAISED WITH DIFFERENT ANTIMICROBIAL ADMINISTRATION IN FEED

ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY AMONG NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE IN NEW ZEALAND, 2002

ETX0282, a Novel Oral Agent Against Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Chemotherapy of bacterial infections. Part II. Mechanisms of Resistance. evolution of antimicrobial resistance

EC Workshop on scientific advice from AMEG

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Characterization of isolates from a multi-drug resistant outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia. coli O145 infections in the United States

Antibiotics: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Slides made by Special consultant Henrik Hasman Statens Serum Institut

Preserving efficacy of chloramphenicol against typhoid fever in a tertiary care hospital, India

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

Isolation & antimicrobial susceptibility of Shigella from patients with acute gastroenteritis in western Nepal

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Advance Access published October 3, 2011

Original article: Current pattern of Salmonella Typhi antimicrobial susceptibility in the era of antibiotic abuse

Detection of ESBL Producing Gram Negative Uropathogens and their Antibiotic Resistance Pattern from a Tertiary Care Centre, Bengaluru, India

Quality assurance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of Shigella species isolated in Children Medical Center Hospital, Tehran, Iran,

Trends in the Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Enteric Fever Isolates a Three Year Report from a Tertiary Care Centre

Transcription:

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Shigella, 2015 and 2016 Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR); August 2017 Hospital and community laboratories are requested to refer all Shigella isolates from cases of shigellosis to ESR for serotyping and biotyping as part of the laboratory-based surveillance of this disease. The antimicrobial susceptibility of viable, non-duplicate Shigella isolates referred to ESR in 2015 and 2016 was tested. This is the first antimicrobial susceptibility survey of Shigella that ESR had undertaken since 1996. Methods Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by agar dilution according to the methods of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). 1 Except for azithromycin and tetracycline, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted according to the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) clinical breakpoints. 2 CLSI breakpoints were used to interpret tetracycline MICS. 1 Currently there are no clinical breakpoints to interpret azithromycin MICs for Shigella. However for S. flexneri and S. sonnei, CLSI have defined epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for azithromycin MICs. 1 ECVs separate bacterial populations into those with acquired and/or mutational resistance mechanisms (referred to as non-wild type, NWT) and those without such mechanisms (referred to as wild type, WT) (see footnote 1, Table 2 for the azithromycin ECVs). Multidrug resistance was defined as resistance (including azithromycin NWT) to 3 antibiotic classes. Any isolates with a ceftriaxone or ceftazidime MIC 2 mg/l were tested for extendedspectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production using the combination disc test. 1 To identify CTX- M type ESBLs, a multiplex PCR that includes primers to detect the genes for the four CTX- M groups, 1, 2, 8 and 9, was used. 3 Any isolates with a cefoxitin MIC 16 mg/l were tested by PCR for plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase genes. 4

Overseas travel history for shigellosis cases was obtained from information reported in the EpiSurv notifiable disease database supplemented with any additional travel information received when the isolate from the case was referred to ESR. The chi-square test was used to determine the significance of any observed differences, with a p value of 0.05 being considered significant. Results The antimicrobial susceptibility of 263 Shigella isolates referred to ESR in 2015 and 2016 was tested. These 263 Shigella comprised 141 (53.6%) S. sonnei, 113 (43.0%) S. flexneri, 7 (2.7%) S. boydii, and 2 (0.8%) S. dysenteriae (Table 1). Table 1. Distribution of species, serotypes and biotypes among Shigella isolates, 2015 and 2016 Species, biotypes and/or serotype Number of isolates Percent of the total 263 isolates Shigella boydii 7 2.7 serotype 2 1 0.4 serotype 4 1 0.4 serotype 13 5 1.9 Shigella dysenteriae 2 0.8 serotype 2 1 0.4 serotype 9 1 0.4 Shigella flexneri 113 43.0 serotype 1a 2 0.8 serotype 1b 20 7.6 serotype 1c 6 2.3 serotype 2a 31 11.8 serotype 2b 10 3.8 serotype 3a 8 3.0 serotype 3b 1 0.4 serotype 4av 3 1.1 serotype 5b 2 0.8 serotype 6 biotype Boyd 88 10 3.8 serotype 6 biotype Manchester 6 2.3 serotype Y 3 1.1 serotype Y variant 2 0.8 not typable 1 9 3.4 Shigella sonnei 141 53.6 biotype a 50 19.0 biotype f 1 0.4 biotype g 90 34.2 1 Agglutinated with polyvalent S. flexneri antisera but not with any of the single factor sera. 2

Resistance to nine of the antimicrobials tested and multidrug resistance is shown in Table 2. There were some significant differences (p 0.05) in resistance between S. flexneri and S. sonnei. S. flexneri were significantly more resistant to ampicillin (p <0.001), chloramphenicol (p <0.001) and gentamicin (p 0.026), and more likely to be multiresistant (p <0.001). Conversely, S. sonnei were significantly more resistant to co-trimoxazole (p 0.022) (Table 2). Table 2. Antimicrobial resistance among Shigella, 2015 and 2016 Antimicrobial S. sonnei n = 141 S. flexneri n = 113 Percent resistant S. boydii n = 7 S. dysenteriae n = 2 All species n = 263 Ampicillin 29.1 72.6 14.3 100 47.9 Azithromycin 1 12.1 9.7 - - 11.0 Ceftriaxone 7.1 2.7 14.3 50.0 5.7 Chloramphenicol 5.7 59.3 0.0 0.0 28.5 Ciprofloxacin 2,3 25.5 20.4 14.3 0.0 22.8 Co-trimoxazole 63.8 49.6 14.3 100 56.7 Gentamicin 0.7 5.3 0.0 0.0 2.7 Meropenem 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tetracycline 48.9 53.1 0.0 100 49.8 Ciprofloxacin + co-trimoxazole 18.4 14.2 14.3 0.0 16.3 Ciprofloxacin + co-trimoxazole + 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 azithromycin 1 Multiresistant to 3 antimicrobials 33.3 62.8 14.3 100 46.0 1 The data given for azithromycin are the percentage that are categorised by the CLSI epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) as non-wild type (ie, MICs 32 mg/l for S. sonnei and MICs 16 mg/l for S. flexneri). There are no CLSI azithromycin ECVs for S. boydii or S. dysenteriae. 2 Norfloxacin susceptibility was also tested and was very similar to ciprofloxacin susceptibility: 59 of the total 60 ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates were also norfloxacin resistant, the remaining ciprofloxacinresistant isolate had intermediate resistance to norfloxacin, and there was one norfloxacin-resistant isolate that had intermediate resistance to ciprofloxacin. The EUCAST clinical breakpoints were used to interpret the norfloxacin MICs, however, these breakpoints are specifically for uncomplicated urinary tract infections. 3 The rates of ciprofloxacin resistance are based on the EUCAST resistance breakpoint of >0.5 mg/l. However, a recent health advisory from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that fluoroquinolones should not be prescribed for the treatment of shigellosis if the ciprofloxacin MIC is 0.12 mg/l (see Reference 6). The percentage of isolates that had ciprofloxacin MICs 0.12 mg/l were: S. sonnei 37.6%, S. flexneri 29.2%, S. boydii 14.3%, S. dysenteriae 100%, and all species 33.8%. 3

There were also significant differences in resistance between the two prevalent S. sonnei biotypes. Compared with S. sonnei biotype a isolates, S. sonnei biotype g isolates were significantly more likely to be azithromycin NWT (17.8 vs 0.0%, p 0.002); more resistant to ceftriaxone (10.0 vs 0.0%, p 0.021), ciprofloxacin (38.9 vs 0.0%, p <0.001), co-trimoxazole (73.3 vs 46.0%, p 0.001) and tetracycline (75.6 vs 2.0%, p <0.001); and more likely to be multidrug resistant (50.0 vs 2.0% p <0.001). The current Australian Therapeutic Guidelines recommend either a fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin or norfloxacin) or co-trimoxazole when treatment of shigellosis is indicated. 5 If an alternative is required due to resistance to these first-line antibiotics, azithromycin is recommended. The overall rates of resistance were relatively high for both ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole (22.8% and 56.7%, respectively), although, as noted above, rates of resistance to these two antimicrobials were quite variable by species and/or S. sonnei biotype. Although not shown in Table 2, norfloxacin susceptibility was also tested and was very similar to ciprofloxacin susceptibility (see footnote 2, Table 2). While the EUCAST breakpoint for ciprofloxacin resistance is >0.5 mg/l, a recent health advisory from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that fluoroquinolones should not be prescribed for the treatment of shigellosis if the ciprofloxacin MIC is 0.12 mg/l. 6 The percentage of isolates that had ciprofloxacin MICs 0.12 mg/l were: S. sonnei 37.6% (S. sonnei biotype g 57.8% and S. sonnei biotype a 0.0%), S. flexneri 29.2%, S. boydii 14.3%, S. dysenteriae 100%, and all species 33.8%. 16.3% (43) of isolates were resistant to both ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole (Table 2). Similar proportions of S. sonnei (18.4%, 26/141) and S. flexneri (14.2%, 16/113) had dual resistance to ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole. However, S. sonnei biotype g was overrepresented among the S. sonnei isolates with this dual resistance, as this biotype accounted for 63.8% (90/141) of the S. sonnei isolates but 96.2% (25/26) of the dual-resistant S. sonnei. Twenty-eight (11.0%) of the S. sonnei and S. flexneri isolates were categorised as azithromycin NWT (Table 2). The prevalence of azithromycin NWT was significantly higher among S. flexneri serotype 2b (30.0%, 3/10) and S. sonnei biotype g (17.8%, 16/90), with the latter accounting for 57.1% (16/28) of all azithromycin-nwt isolates. Three (2.1%) S. sonnei isolates were azithromycin NWT, ciprofloxacin resistant and co-trimoxazole resistant, that is, resistant to all three antibiotic classes recommended for treatment. Two of these three S. sonnei were biotype g and the remaining isolate was biotype f. The travel 4

history for two of the three cases was known and both (one with biotype g and one with biotype f) had travelled to India. Fifteen isolates (5.7%) were ceftriaxone resistant and all 15 had a CTX-M type ESBL: 9 had a CTX-M group 1 ESBL, 4 had a CTX-M group 9 ESBL, 1 had a CTX-M group 8 ESBL, and one had both CTX-M group 1 and group 9 ESBLs. No plasmid-mediated AmpC β- lactamases were identified. Table 3. Antimicrobial resistance among Shigella from cases who had travelled overseas compared with non-travellers, 2015 and 2016 Antimicrobial Cases who had travelled overseas n = 166 Percent resistant Cases who had not travelled overseas n = 97 p value for significance of any difference in resistance between travellers and non-travellers 1 Ampicillin 44.0 54.6 0.095 Azithromycin 2 5.6 20.7 <0.001 Ceftriaxone 6.6 4.1 0.398 Chloramphenicol 29.5 26.8 0.638 Ciprofloxacin 24.7 19.6 0.341 Co-trimoxazole 58.4 53.6 0.446 Gentamicin 0.6 6.2 0.007 Tetracycline 50.6 48.5 0.737 Ciprofloxacin + co-trimoxazole 17.5 14.4 0.521 Multiresistant to 3 antimicrobial classes 46.4 45.4 0.872 1 Chi-square test. 2 The data given for azithromycin are the percentage of S. flexneri and S. sonnei that were categorised by the CLSI epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) as non-wild type. Among the 254 cases who had either of these two species, 162 were reported to have recently travelled overseas and 92 were reported to have not been overseas. When susceptibility among Shigella isolates was compared according to whether the case had recently travelled overseas, azithromycin NWT and gentamicin resistance was significantly more prevalent among cases who had not travelled (Table 3). Further analysis according to the Shigella species and biotype, showed that S. flexneri from patients who had not travelled were significantly more likely to be azithromycin NWT (17.8 vs 4.1% p 0.019) and gentamicin resistant (13.3 vs 0.0% p 0.002) than isolates of this species from patients 5

who had recently travelled. S. sonnei biotype a isolates from patients who had not travelled were significantly more likely to be ampicillin resistant (52.9 vs 18.2% p 0.012) and S. sonnei biotype g isolates from patients who had not travelled were significantly more likely to be azithromycin NWT (36.7 vs 8.3% p 0.001). Notably, there were no antibiotics for which the rate of resistance was significantly higher among isolates from patients who had travelled overseas. Antimicrobial resistance among Shigella, including azithromycin non-susceptibility, has been reported in several other countries (including Australia, the United States, Canada, England and Taiwan) to be associated with Shigella isolated from men who have sex with men (MSM). 7-11 No information on the sexual practices of cases is currently systematically collected with shigellosis notifications in New Zealand. An analysis of total 28 azithromycin-nwt S. flexneri and S. sonnei by the age and sex of the patients is presented in Table 4. While the prevalence of azithromycin NWT among isolates from males (13.9%) was twice that among isolates from females (7.7%), this difference was not significant (p 0.117). In a further breakdown by age group, azithromycin NWT was more prevalent among isolates from males in all age groups except the youngest group (<20 years), although the only age group in which the difference reached statistical significance was in the 40-59 years group. Twelve (63.2%) of the 19 azithromycin-nwt isolates from males were S. sonnei biotype g compared with four (44.4%) of the 9 azithromycin-nwt isolates from females. Among the other antimicrobials, only the prevalence of tetracycline resistance was significantly different between the sexes with 55.7% of Shigella from males being resistant compared with 43.1% of isolates from females. 6

Table 4. Age and sex distribution of patients with azithromycin-non-wild type S. flexneri and S. sonnei, 2015 and 2016 Age group (years) Azithromycin non-wild type From female cases Number of isolates (% 1 ) From male cases p value for significance of any difference between females and males 2 <20 3 (12.5) 2 (5.6) 0.340 20-39 2 (5.4) 4 (10.3) 0.433 40-59 2 (5.6) 8 (22.2) 0.041 60 2 (10.0) 5 (19.2) 0.388 Total 9 (7.7) 19 (13.9) 0.117 1 Only includes cases due to S. flexneri or S. sonnei. There were 117 female cases of shigellosis due to S. flexneri or S. sonnei: 24 in the <20 years age group, 37 in the 20-39 years age group, 36 in the 40-59 years age group and 20 in the 60 age group. There were 137 male cases of shigellosis due to S. flexneri or S. sonnei: 36 in the <20 years age group, 39 in the 20-39 years age group, 36 in the 40-59 years age group and 26 in the 60 age group. These case numbers were used as the denominators to calculate the percentage of azithromycin NWT among isolates for each sex and age group. 2 Chi-square test. References 1 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-sixth informational supplement. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2016. CLSI document M100-S26. 2 European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 6.0; 2016 Jan. Available from: URL: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/pdfs/eucast_files/breakpoint_tables/v_6.0_breakpoint _table.pdf. 3 Woodford N, Fagan EJ, Ellington MJ. Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 57: 154-5. 4 Perez-Perez FJ, Hanson ND. Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 2153-62. 5 Antibiotic Expert Groups. Therapeutic guidelines: antibiotic. Version 15. Melbourne: Therapeutics Guidelines Ltd; 2014. 6 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC recommendations for diagnosing and managing Shigella strains with possible reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. CDC Health Alert Network; 2017. CDCHAN00401. Available at https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/han00401.asp. 7 Brown J, Willcox SJ, Franklin N, et al. Shigellosis: high rates of antibiotic resistance necessitate new treatment recommendations. Med J Aust 2016 204: 261-e1. 8 Bowen A, Grass J, Bicknese A, et al. Elevated risk for antimicrobial drug-resistant Shigella infection among men who have sex with men, United States, 2011-2015. Emerg Infect Dis 2016; 22: 1613-6. 9 Gaudreau C, Pilon PA, Cornut G, et al. Shigella flexneri with ciprofloxacin resistance and reduced azithromycin susceptibility, Canada, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 2016; 22: 2016-8. 10 Mook P, McCormick J, Bains M, et al. ESBL-producing and macrolide-resistant Shigella sonnei infections among men who have sex with men, England, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 2016; 22: 1948-52. 11 Liao YS, Liu YY, Lo YC, et al. Azithromycin-nonsusceptible Shigella flexneri 3a in men who have sex with men. Taiwan, 2015-2016. Emerg Infect Dis 2017; 23: 345-6. 7