Sales survey of Veterinary Medicinal Products containing Antimicrobials in France

Similar documents
Sales survey of Veterinary Medicinal Products containing Antimicrobials in France Volumes and estimated exposure of animals to antimicrobials

Sales survey of veterinary medicinal products containing antimicrobials in France in Annual report

Antimicrobial use and Antimicrobial resistance: chapter 6.7 and 6.8 of the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health

OIE initiative establishing a global database on consumption of antimicrobials for animals: state of play

Guidance for completing the OIE template for the collection of data on antimicrobial agents intended for use in animals

ESVAC (European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption)

Working group session

Result of the OIE data collection

European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC) Web Based Sales Data and Animal Population Data Collection Protocol (version 2)

Antimicrobial Resistance Actions undertaken by the Anses (alternatives to AM)

BTSF. Better Training for Safer Food Initiative. Antimicrobial Resistance One Health approach MEASURE UNITS

Antimicrobial use in animals: OIE collection of data on antimicrobial agents used in animals (2015)

Collection of quantitative data on the use of antimicrobial agents including the establishment of an OIE database

Activities and achievements related to the reduction in antibiotics use and resistance in veterinary medicine in Belgium in 2016

European Medicines Agency role and experience on antimicrobial resistance

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Antimicrobial use in humans

European Public MRL assessment report (EPMAR)

prof. Jozef Bires, DVM, DSc. Chief Veterinary Officer The State Veterinary and Food Administration of the SR

European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC)

Fight against Antimicrobial Resistance Contribution of a private veterinary organization. REMESA, Faro, Portugal Christophe BRARD, 14th June 2013,

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Bottle of powder: Active substance: ceftiofur sodium mg equivalent to ceftiofur...

Antibiotic Sales and Use Overview Prepared for Approvals and ACVM Group. ISBN No: (online)

ARCH-Vet. Summary 2013

Summary of the latest data on antibiotic consumption in the European Union

Session 1: An introduction to the new requirements under the Food and Drug Regulations affecting industry and health care practitioners who compound

FACT SHEETS. On the Danish restrictions of non-therapeutical use of antibiotics for growth promotion and its consequences

B. PACKAGE LEAFLET 1

Dr Elisabeth Erlacher Vindel Head of Science and New Technologies Departement OIE AMR strategy and activities related to animal health

Global animal production perspectives and correlated use of antimicrobial agents

ANNEX III LABELLING AND PACKAGE LEAFLET

ECDC-EFSA-EMA Joint Opinion on Outcome Indicators on Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance and Use of Antimicrobials

OIE Strategy on Antimicrobial Resistance and the need for new diagnostic tools

EMA advice on the impact of the use of antibiotics on public and animal health: Potential impact on the authorisation of antimicrobials

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Cephacare flavour 50 mg tablets for cats and dogs. Excipients: For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1.

EC Workshop on scientific advice from AMEG

Antibiotic usage in the British sheep industry. Dr Peers Davies

OIE Strategy on Antimicrobial Resistance and the Prudent Use of Antimicrobials in Animals Part I

Livestock Quality Assurance Education for Youth Producers 2017

CIPARS The Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance. Highlights from 2016

General Directorate of Animal Health and EpizooticDiseases Control. Dr.Sabah Hassan Abdelgadir Sudan Focal Point for Veterinary products

Activities and achievements regarding the reduction in the use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine in Belgium in 2017

CLSI vs. EUCAST. What is EUCAST? Structure of EUCAST CLSI. Where they fit? SASCM WORKSHOP 5/24/2014

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

4.5. Special precautions for use Special precautions to be taken by person administering the veterinary medicinal product to animals

How is Ireland performing on antibiotic prescribing?

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

OIE Resolution and activities related to the Global Action Plan. Regional Seminar for OIE National Focal Points for Veterinary Products 4 th Cycle

FLOXYME 50 mg/ml SOLUTION FOR USE IN DRINKING WATER

Information note regarding the Danish and EU restrictions of non-therapeutical use of antibiotics for growth promotion

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE STANDARD

CVMP strategy on antimicrobials

[Version 7.2, 12/2008] ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Antimicrobial consumption

Norwegian policies to address antimicrobial resistance

Control and monitoring of the use of antibiotics as a strategy against antimicrobials resistance

LABELLING AND PACKAGE LEAFLET

Quality of Veterinary Medicinal Products. How to ensure the quality of Veterinary Medicinal Products

WHO efforts to reduce the impact on public and animal health of antibiotic use in animals. Dr Danilo Lo Fo Wong Senior Adviser AMR

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Current EU Antibiotic Maximum Residue Limits

DANMAP Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme

For the treatment of infections caused by a wide range of Gram-positive and Gramnegative pathogenic bacteria including:

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Medicinal product no longer authorised

Veterinary Feed Directive

COUNTRY PRESENTATION ON RECENT ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY FOCAL POINT BHUTAN

Summary of Product Characteristics

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Medicinal product no longer authorised

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

BOX 1. NAME OF THE VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCT. Hymatil 300 mg/ml solution for injection for cattle and sheep Tilmicosin

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR): Presentation on the joint EMA/EFSA RONAFA opinion Harmonisation of SPCs of antimicrobial veterinary medicines

Global Overview on Antibiotic Use Policies in Veterinary Medicine

Scientific Discussion post-authorisation update for Rheumocam extension X/007

WHO perspective on antimicrobial resistance

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

UNDERSTANDING SOUTH AFRICA'S CONSUMPTION OF ANTIMICROBIALS

Medically Important Antibiotics in Animal Agriculture

Quality of Veterinary Medicinal Products. How to ensure the quality of Veterinary Medicinal Products

Units of measurement for animals for the collection of data per animal species: Defined Daily Dose (DDDvet) and Defined Course Dose (DCDvet)

Draft ESVAC Vision and Strategy

Scientific and technical support NOTE of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety

A comparison of antimicrobial usage in human and veterinary medicine in France from 1999 to 2005

Summary of Product Characteristics

OIE List of Antimicrobial Agents of Veterinary Importance and OIE Standards and Activities

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

International Harmonisation in the Field of Pharmacovigilance from an OIE perspective

1 January 2017, It is Coming Preparation for VFD Changes Beginning 1 January 2017

CHOICES The magazine of food, farm and resource issues

Managing AMR at the Human-Animal Interface. OIE Contributions to the AMR Global Action Plan

Veterinary Feed Directive: What You Need to Know

B. PACKAGE LEAFLET 1

[Version 8.1,01/2017] ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

DANMAP and VetStat. Monitoring resistance and antimicrobial consumption in production animals

SUMMARY OF THE PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Amoxicillin trihydrate. Amoxicillin trihydrate. Amoxicillin trihydrate. Amoxicillin trihydrate. Amoxicillin trihydrate. Amoxicillin trihydrate

ANNEXES. to the Proposal. for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Guidance on collection and provision of national data on antimicrobial use by animal species/categories

Transcription:

Sales survey of Veterinary Medicinal Products containing Antimicrobials in France - 2009 February 2011 Édition scientifique

Sales survey of Veterinary Medicinal Products containing Antimicrobials in France - 2009 February 2011 Édition scientifique The French Agency for Veterinary Medicinal Products La Haute Marche - Javené - BP 90203 F-35302 Fougères Cedex - France www.anmv.anses.fr

National agency for veterinary Medicinal products Sales survey of Veterinary Medicinal Products containing Antimicrobials in France - 2009 Fougères, February 2011 G. Moulin and A. Chevance, Anses-ANMV With the participation of Claire Chauvin, Anses-Ploufragan

Summary The French monitoring system of veterinary antimicrobials was initiated in 1999. It is coordinated by the French Agency for Veterinary Medicinal Products (Anses/ANMV), in collaboration with the French Veterinary Medicine Industry association (SIMV), and is performed according to the OIE guideline on monitoring of antimicrobials (in Animal Terrestrial Code 2009 Chapter 6.8). The monitoring is based on a questionnaire sent to each applicant who has registered a veterinary medicinal product containing antimicrobials. In 2009, the applicants were required to provide information about the repartition between species for each commercial presentation in addition to the number of sold units. Sales in weight of active ingredients In 2009, the total sales volume accounts for 1 067.35 tons of antimicrobials. As for previous years, four antimicrobial classes (Tetracyclines, Sulfonamides, Penicillins, Macrolides) represent more than 80 % of the tonnage of sold antimicrobials. Tetracyclines alone represent around half of the overall. Fluroquinolones and Cephalosporins volumes are relatively low. In 2009, the total antimicrobial sales have decreased of 13 % (159 tons) compared to 2008 and the sales have decreased of 19.3 % (255 tons) compared to 1999. The 2009 sales represent the lowest sales volume recorded during the 11 years period. This decrease is mainly due to the sales of antimicrobials belonging to Tetracyclines (decrease of 22.2 % i.e. 139 tons) and to Sulfonamides (decrease of 32.0 % i.e. 86 tons). Compared to 1999, the sales of Fluoroquinolones have increased of 48.94 % (i.e. 1.61 tons) and the sales of Quinolones have decreased of 63.3 % (i.e. 12.99 tons). Compared to 2008, the sales of Fluoroquinolones have stabilized in 2009 (+0.09 %) Compared to 1999, the sales of 3 rd and 4 th generation Cephalosporins have increased of 105.6 % (i.e. 0.94 ton) and the sales of 1 st and 2 nd generation Cephalosporins have increased of 28.4 % (i.e. 1,5 tons). Compared to 2008, the sales of 3 rd and 4 th generation Cephalosporins have decreased of 13.7 % (i.e. 0.29 ton). Sales in weight of active ingredients per Kg of animal bodyweight When taking into account the weight of animals treated, the decrease is only of 11.83 % compared to 1999. In 2009, sales correspond to an equivalent of 67.73 mg/kg of animal weight produced. The sold tonnages per class do not represent accurately the use of antimicrobials as differences in dosages and durations of administration are not taken into account. Antimicrobials belonging to the new classes generally require a lower weight of active ingredient to treat one animal than an old antimicrobial. 1

Weight of animal treated with antimicrobials To evaluate the exposure to antimicrobials, the weight of animal treated has been evaluated for each substance administrated orally and parenterally. For the intra-mammary route, the number of treatments for each medicinal product has been calculated. The weight of animals treated by parenteral route decreases of 14.6 % in 2009 compared to 1999. The weight of animals treated by oral route increases of 12.8 % in 2009 compared to 1999. However, a decrease is noticed for the 2 last years (a decrease of 14.4 % in 2009 compared to 2007). The number of animals treated by intra-mammary route decreases of 15.4 % compared to 2008 and of 28.7 % compared to 1999. Exposure to antimicrobials The antimicrobial exposure index (ALEA: Animal Level of Exposure to Antimicrobials) is obtained by dividing the weight of animal treated by the weight of the animal population potentially treated. The ALEA index is an estimate that is strongly correlated to the number of animal treated in the population and is a good output to evaluate the exposure to antimicrobials. When comparing 2009 and 1999 results, the ALEA index representing the exposure to antimicrobials (for the oral and parenteral routes), irrespective of classes and species, increases of 12.6 %. Compared to 2008, the ALEA index decreases of 3.9 %. The evolution on the last two years shows a change in the trend observed until 2007, this reduction of the exposure has to be confirmed the next years. 0,900 0,800 0,700 0,600 0,500 0,400 0,300 0,200 0,100 0,000 Evolution of the exposure to antimicrobials Oral and parenteral routes (ALEA) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Oral route (including premixes) Premixes Parenteral route Total (oral and parenteral routes) Between 1999 and 2009, 16 new marketing authorizations of veterinary medicine products with Fluoroquinolones have been granted (18 in 1999 vs. 34 in 2009), over this same time, 2

the level of exposure has increased of 93.6 % for Fluoroquinolones and has decreased of 53.8 % for Quinolones. Compared to 2008, the level of exposure to Fluoroquinolones has decreased of 0.85 %. Compared to 1999, the number of marketing authorizations of veterinary medicine products with 3 rd and 4 th generation Cephalosporins has doubled (6 in 1999 vs. 12 in 2009). Over this same time, the level of exposure to 3 rd and 4 th generation Cephalosporins has increased of 254.7 % and the level of exposure to 1 st and 2 nd generation Cephalosporins has increased of 43.8 %. Compared to 2008, the level of exposure to 3 rd & 4 th generation Cephalosporins has decreased of 14.8 %. Discussion The methodology implemented in this antimicrobials sales survey does not allow to describe with precision the off label use, even if the new approach implemented in 2009 (estimate of the repartition between species by MA holders) takes partly into account this type of use. Complementary field studies have been or should be performed in order to complement the information obtained with this national antimicrobials sales survey. The important decrease of the sold tonnage observed between 1999 and 2009, is mainly due to the use of new antimicrobials replacing antimicrobials belonging to older classes like Tetracyclines and Sulfonamides. Fluoroquinolones and Cephalosporins are considered as critically important antimicrobials for human health and the increase of their use in veterinary medicine is worrying. According to European recommendations (European Medicine Agency reflection paper ion the use of Cephalosporins and Fluoroquinolones) these antimicrobials should be second intent antimicrobials and reserved to curative treatment. The data collected allow to follow the evolution of the antimicrobial sales and to have an estimation of their use in veterinary medicine. Information is one indicator to evaluate the impact of actions implemented in term of responsible use of antimicrobials. 3

Contents Introduction...6 1. Material and methods...6 2. Results for 2009...12 2.1. Results presented by antimicrobial class and route of administration...12 2.1.1. Results expressed in weight of active ingredient...12 2.1.2. Results expressed as proportion of antimicrobial treatment...14 2.2. Results presented by animal species...15 2.2.1. Results presented by category of animals...15 2.2.2. Results presented by target species...16 3. Evolution of antimicrobial sales between 1999 and 2009...18 3.1. Overall evolution of antimicrobial sales...18 3.1.1. Results expressed in weight of active ingredient...18 3.1.2. Results expressed in weight of animal treated...18 3.2. Evolution of antimicrobial sales per antimicrobial class...20 3.2.1. Results expressed in weight of active ingredient...20 3.2.2. Results expressed in weight of active ingredient related to animal population...21 3.2.3. Results expressed in weight of animal treated...23 3.2.4. Results expressed as Animal Level of Exposure to Antimicrobials (ALEA)...24 3.2.5. Comparison of different outputs to describe the evolution of antimicrobial sales...25 3.3. Evolution of antimicrobial sales per animal species...26 4. Discussion...31 5. Conclusion...32 4

Annex...33 Annex 1: Parameters for calculation of animal body weight potentially treated by antimicrobials between 1999 and à 2009 Annex 2: Amount of active ingredient per substance to treat orally one ton of bodyweight) Annex 3: Comparison between the bodyweight treated by ingredient or by medicinal product Annex 4: Repartition of antimicrobial sales by antimicrobial class for each species Annex 5: Evolution of bodyweight treated for bovine, pig, poultry, dogs and cats 5

Introduction Antimicrobial resistance is a public health issue concerning both human and veterinary medicine. Sales monitoring is one of the basic source of information to be used for risk assessment and risk management. The National Agency for Veterinary Medicinal products (French agency for food, environment and occupational health safety previously called French Food Safety Agency) has initiated a sales survey for veterinary antimicrobials products in 1999. This survey is performed according to the OIE guideline on monitoring of antimicrobials (in Animal Terrestrial Code 2009 Chapter 6.8). This survey is based on marketing authorization holders declarations following an agreement with the SIMV (Syndicat de l industrie du médicament vétérinaire et réactifs). Data should be compared to other sources of information such as annual turnover of applicant supplier medicinal veterinary products and farm surveys on antimicrobial consumptions. The present report describes the veterinary antimicrobial sales for 2009 and includes a study on the previous year s results. 1. Material and Methods 1-1. Basic sources of information - Information provided by the Marketing Authorization Holder The monitoring is based on a questionnaire sent annually to each Marketing Authorisation Holder who has registered in France a veterinary medicinal product containing antimicrobials. Marketing Authorisation Holders are asked to declare the number of units sold for each commercial presentation of each veterinary medicinal product. In 2009, the applicants were required to provide also information about the repartition between species. These figures should be supplied for the period from 1 st January to 31 st December of the previous year and cover all Medicinal products sold. - Data about the French animal population In order to take into account fluctuations in animal population in the interpretation of data, information published by Agreste 1 are used for food producing animals. For pets, data are provided by FACCO 2 (Employers' federation of Food Manufacturers for Dogs, Cats, Birds and other familiar animals), data are available every two years. 1 http://agreste.agriculture.gouv.fr/ 6

For fishes, data provided by Aquamedia 3 are used. - Information about the posology and the treatment duration The dose and treatment duration retained for each active ingredient for the oral route administrated to food animal producing are detailed in annex 2. For each intramammary and injectable product, the dosage and duration of administration from the French SPC have been retained. 1-2. Data validation In order to check for any declaration errors, sales volumes declarations are compared to annual turnover declarations provided independently by marketing authorisation holders. Any difference in declarations is investigated. 1-3. Calculation and interpretation The sales data for each presentation are cross-referenced with data available in the French Agency of Veterinary Medicinal Products database (qualitative and quantitative composition, pharmaceutical form, target species ). Calculations are performed to express the sales in weight of active ingredient. For some active substances expressed in IU, a conversion factor (OMS standard value) has been used: 3200 IU for 1 mg of Spiramycin 8403 IU for 1 mg of Polymyxin B 20500 IU for 1 mg of Colistin sulphate 12700 IU for 1 mg of Colistine méthane sulphonate 74 IU for 1 mg of Bacitracin 820 IU for 1 mg of Dihydrostreptomycin 920 IU for 1 mg of Erythromycin 620 IU for 1 mg of Gentamicin. These conversion factors have been updated for the survey 2009 taking into account recommendations of the European Medicines agency (EMA) in the framework of the European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC) project. 2 http://www.facco.fr 3 http://www.aquamedia.org 7

Repartition between species It is difficult to give figures for each animal species as a same veterinary medicinal product can be indicated for use in several species, therefore an estimation of sales per species has to be performed. In 2009, the applicants were required to provide information about the repartition between species for each commercial presentation. We have received information about this repartition for 60.7 % of the presentations of veterinary medicine products targeted to more than one species. Globally, including the products targeted to only one species, information for 74 % of the presentations of marketed products are available. Information is available for 88.2 % of the total sold tonnage. For the veterinary medicine products without information on the species repartition, an extrapolation of the repartition was done from antimicrobials of the same class and same route of administration. This methodology has been applied retrospectively to the sales between 1999 and 2009. Expression of results In this report, different outputs are provided: - Results expressed in weight of the active ingredient (Wacti) This way of expressing results is the most direct and usual way. However, if it enables to see evolution during time, it does not represent accurately the use of antimicrobials as differences in dosages and durations of administration are not taken into account. It does not enable comparison between classes of antimicrobials and does not take also into account changes in animal populations. - Results in weight of the active ingredient related to the animal population weight (Wacti/WAP) This indicator improves the expression of antimicrobial sales in taking into account changes in animal populations. However, it does not take into account the dose and treatment duration. This constitutes a better estimate of the use and enables to give results expressed in quantity of active by Kg of animal weight. - Results expressed in Weight of Animal Treated (WAT) The weight of animal treated with the antimicrobial class is obtained by dividing the sales volume expressed in weight of active ingredient by (dose multiplied by Treatment duration). The dose and treatment duration retained for the different substances administered orally to food producing animals are presented in annex 2. For each intramammary and injectable product, the dosage and duration of administration in the French SPC have been retained. In this report, the weight of animal treated has been calculated by active ingredient, to evaluate the exposure per class. As several veterinary medicine products are asociated, the weight of animal treated assessed by active ingredient is higher than the weight of animal 8

treated estimated by product (see annex 3). The weight of animal treated is linked to the recommended doses and treatment durations which may be different from those prescribed. WAT takes into account the dose and duration of administration but doesn t take into account the weight of animal population. This constitutes a better estimate of the use of the different antimicrobial classes than the weight of the active ingredient and allows to estimate the relative part of the treatments performed for each antimicrobial class. - Results presented as exposure index (ALEA) (Animal Level of Exposure to Antimicrobials) The antimicrobial exposure index is obtained by dividing WAT by the Potential Animal Weight treated (WAP). It takes into account the animal population as well as dose and treatment duration. As figures concerning the animal population are usually expressed in number of animals, it is necessary to estimate a mean weight for each animal species in order to obtain the potential weight to be treated (WAP= Weight of Animal Population). Calculated WAP are provided in annex 1. The estimation of animal level of exposure to antimicrobials could be improved in taking into account the weight of animal at treatment instead of the total weight of animals in the country. This index may also enable comparisons between countries. The ALEA index is an estimate that is directly correlated to the number of animal treated in the population. 9

Data Wacti Weight Active declared Dose Number of mg active / Kg body weight Duration Number of days of treatment WAP Weight of animal population potentially treated(total) Outputs Wacti Weight Active Wacti/WAP Weight Active declared/ Weight of animal population WAT Weight of animal treated : Wacti/(Dose*Duration) ALEA Animal Level of Exposure to Antimicrobials Takes into account Enables comparison between Outputs Calculation Units Sales Dose Duration Animal Pop AM Classes Species Countries Animal and Human Representative of exposure Wacti Weight active Tons + - - - - + + + + mg/kg Animal Wacti/WAP (1000*Wacti)/WAP weight + - - + - ++ ++ ++ ++ Wacti/(Dose*duration) Tons + + + - +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ WAT ALEA WAT/ Weight Animal population Ratio + + + + ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ 10

1-4. Main changes for the 2009 report in comparison to previous reports The weights of active ingredients for some classes for the previous years may differ from those provided in the previous reports, as new conversion (IU/mg) have been used for some antimicrobials. The repartition between species has been modified and is based on data provided by marketing authorisation holders. The weight of animal treated for injectable products has been assessed by active ingredient and not by medicinal product. 11

2. Results for 2009 2.1. Results presented by antimicrobial class and route of administration 2.1.1 Results expressed in weight of active ingredient Table 1: Distribution of each antimicrobials family per route of administration (in tons of active ingredient) Sales 2009 Oral Parenteral Intramammary (in tons) External Total Percentage Aminoglycosides 29.15 39.74 2.30 0.21 71.40 6.69% Cephalosporins 1 & 2G 5.02 0.12 1.45 0.05 6.64 0.62% Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 0.00 1.59 0.23 0.00 1.83 0.17% Other 17.07 0.71 0.34 0.00 18.12 1.70% Fluoroquinolones 2.62 2.27 0.00 0.01 4.90 0.46% Furans 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00% Macrolides 70.04 10.28 0.11 0.02 80.45 7.54% Penicillins 51.32 51.35 2.84 0.38 105.89 9.92% Phenicols 0.03 4.76 0.00 0.23 5.02 0.47% Polymyxins 64.43 0.52 0.01 0.01 64.97 6.09% Quinolones 7.52 0.02 0.00 0.00 7.54 0.71% Sulfonamides 177.62 4.89 0.00 1.22 183.73 17.21% Tetracyclines 476.85 8.43 1.27 2.07 488.61 45.78% Trimethoprim 27.73 0.47 0.00 0.00 28.20 2.64% Total (in tons) 929.41 125.15 8.55 4.23 1067.35 100.00% Percentage 87.08% 11.73% 0.80% 0.40% 100.00% In 2009, the total sales volume accounts for 1067.35 tons of antimicrobials. As for previous surveys, 4 antimicrobial classes (Tetracyclines, Sulfonamides, Penicillins and Macrolides) account for more than 80 % of the total antimicrobial sales. The Tetracyclines class represents alone about half of the sales. Fluoroquinolones and Cephalosporins volumes are relatively low. 12

The following table gives the relative distribution of each antimicrobial class per route of administration. Table 2: Relative distribution of each antimicrobials class expressed in percentage for each route of administration (%) Sales 2009 Oral Parenteral Intramammary External Aminoglycosides 3.14% 31.75% 26.90% 4.96% Cephalosporins 1 & 2G 0.54% 0.10% 16.97% 1.18% Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 0.00% 1.27% 2.73% 0.00% Other 1.84% 0.57% 3.96% 0.00% Fluoroquinolones 0.28% 1.82% 0.00% 0.24% Furans 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Macrolides 7.54% 8.22% 1.25% 0.47% Penicillins 5.52% 41.03% 33.21% 8.98% Phenicols 0.00% 3.80% 0.00% 5.44% Polymyxins 6.93% 0.41% 0.14% 0.24% Quinolones 0.81% 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% Sulfonamides 19.11% 3.91% 0.00% 28.84% Tetracyclines 51.31% 6.73% 14.83% 48.94% Trimethoprim 2.98% 0.37% 0.00% 0.00% Percentage 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 13

2.1.2 Results expressed in weight of active ingredient (Wacti) and in weight of animal treated (WAT) The weight of animal treated by the antimicrobial classes has been obtained by dividing the weight of active ingredient of each active by the amount of antimicrobial required to treat one kg of animal (recommended doses and treatment durations which may be different from those prescribed). The weight of animal treated has been summed up for each antimicrobial class and divided by the sum of WAT of all classes of antimicrobials for the oral, the parenteral and the intramammary routes. Results obtained in weight of active ingredients and in weight of animal treated expressed in percentage are compared in the following table. Table 3. Comparison by route of administration of the results obtained using the Weight of active ingredients (Wacti) and the relative Weight of Animals Treated (WAT). Oral Parenteral Intra-mammary Sales 2009 Wacti WAT Wacti WAT Wacti WAT Aminoglycosides 3.14% 2.64% 31.75% 17.20% 26.90% 19.69% Cephalosporins 1 & 2 G 0.54% 0.11% 0.10% 0.04% 16.97% 14.22% Cephalosporins 3 & 4 G 0.00% 0.00% 1.27% 7.66% 2.73% 6.49% Others 1.84% 2.63% 0.57% 0.78% 3.96% 22.28% Fluoroquinolones 0.28% 1.34% 1.82% 7.59% 0.00% 0.00% Furans 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Macrolides 7.54% 3.64% 8.22% 13.26% 1.25% 0.73% Penicillins 5.52% 10.98% 41.03% 32.97% 33.21% 19.12% Phenicols 0.00% 0.01% 3.80% 3.61% 0.00% 1.29% Polymyxins 6.93% 35.05% 0.41% 2.45% 0.14% 0.00% Quinolones 0.81% 1.23% 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% Sulfnamides 19.11% 9.66% 3.91% 1.59% 0.00% 0.00% Tetracyclines 51.31% 27.11% 6.73% 11.64% 14.83% 16.18% Trimethoprim 2.98% 5.59% 0.37% 1.20% 0.00% 0.00% Percentage 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Results expresses in weight of animals treated give a better picture of the use of antimicrobials. For the oral route, sales expressed in the weight of animal treated show that treatments with Polymyxins are the most frequent treatments used followed by Tetracyclines. For the parenteral route, Penicillins are the most frequent treatments used followed by Aminoglycosides, Macrolides, and Tetracyclines. The weight of animal treated with Fluoroquinolones and 3 rd & 4 th generation Cephalosporins represent respectively 7.59% and 7.66 % of the total weight of animal treated with injectable products. 14

2.2. Results presented by animal species 2.2.1 Results presented by category of animals A first way of approaching the repartition between species is to present data using categories of animals according to veterinary medicinal products indications (Food producing animals, Companion animals, Food producing and companion animals). This enables to have a first estimate of the use of antimicrobials in these different categories. Table 4. Repartition for each antimicrobials class by animal category (in tons of active ingredient) Sales 2009 Food animals Food animals and companion animals Companion animals Total (in tons) Aminoglycosides 43.25 27.65 0.50 71.40 Cephalosporins 1 & 2G 1.51-5.14 6.64 Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 1.74-0.08 1.83 Others 15.74 0.66 1.72 18.12 Fluoroquinolones 4.37 0.14 0.39 4.90 Furans - - 0.02 0.02 Macrolides 78.98 0.20 1.27 80.45 Penicillins 67.64 32.28 5.98 105.89 Phenicols 4.76 0.15 0.11 5.02 Polymyxins 64.85 0.11-64.97 Quinolones 7.53-0.01 7.54 Sulfonamides 177.89 2.86 2.98 183.73 Tetracyclines 487.77 0.45 0.40 488.61 Trimethoprim 27.90 0.26 0.04 28.20 Total (in tons) 983.93 64.76 18.65 1067.35 Antimicrobials intended for food producing animals only account for more than 92 % of the total antimicrobials sales. Furans are only intended for use in companion animals. 15

2.2.2 Results per species Sales by species have been expressed in percentage of total weight of active ingredient and in percentage of total weight of animal treated, detailed tables are available in annex 4. Cattle Table 5. Antimicrobials sales repartition by species according to different outputs Cat - Dog Horse Fish Rabbit Sheep- Goat Swine Poultry Others Total Wacti % 16.07 % 1.83 % 0.51 % 0.24 % 7.82 % 7.18 % 43.87 % 22.46 % 0.01 % 100 % WAT % 29.31 % 3.24 % 1.24 % 0.09 % 3.37 % 4.73 % 32.91 % 25.10 % 0.01 % 100 % - Wacti Weight of active ingredient This output allows to estimate that nearly 44 % of the sold tonnage of antimicrobials is intended for pigs, more than 22 % is intended for poultry. When expressed in active ingredients, results are not representative of the exposure to antimicrobials of the animal species. - WAT Weight of animal treated: Wacti/(Dosage*Duration) Nearly 30 % of the weight of animal treated relates to cattle, almost 33 % to swine and 25 % to poultry. Expressing results in weight of animals treated takes into account posology and duration of treatments but does not take into account the population treated. When the mass of the population potentially treated is taken into account this gives a better picture of the use of antimicrobials in the different species (e.g. table 6). Cattle Table 6. Antimicrobials sales by species expressed in mg/kg and in ALEA Cat - Dog Horse Fish Rabbit Sheep- Goat Swine Poultry Others Total Wacti/Wap mg/kg 17.83 122.18 23.65 53.46 902.56 119.42 153.57 127.11 4.05 67.73 ALEA 0.33 2.17 0.58 0.19 3.90 0.79 1.16 1.43 0.04 0.68 In 2009, sales correspond to an equivalent of 67.73 mg/kg of animal weight produced. 16

- ALEA Index of animal level of exposure to antimicrobials The ALEA factor represents the best the exposure to antimicrobials as it takes into account the dose administered, the duration of treatment as well as the animal population potentially treated. If the ALEA is equal to 1, it means that the weight of animal treated is exactly the same than the weight of population animal. An ALEA of 33 % for cattle means that in 2009, the sales intended for cattle have been used to treat 33 % of the bodyweight of cattle produced in France This shows that cats and dogs, rabbits, pigs and poultry are the most exposed species to antimicrobial treatments. These figures should be taken with caution as the use in young and older animals can be different. So for cattle, the antimicrobials administrated by the oral route are intended only to veals, our estimation shows that the ALEA for veals is close to the ALEAs for swine and poultry. The assessment of animal level of exposure to antimicrobials may be improved in taking into account the weight of animal during the treatment instead of the total weight of animals in the country. 17

3. Evolution of antimicrobial sales between 1999 and 2009 3.1. Overall evolution of antimicrobial sales 3.1.1. Results expressed in weight of active ingredient Table 7. Evolution of weight of active ingredient according to the route of administration (Wacti) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Oral 1 135.81 1 203.66 1 201.33 1 164.68 1 144.69 1 127.54 1 170.59 1 104.34 1 237.81 1 078.38 929.41 including premixes 826.88 851.25 798.34 710.8 671.29 641.57 651.84 621.41 705.57 618.33 514.30 Parenteral 167.41 169.11 166.13 158.39 152.55 140.88 143.11 145.54 133.84 133.27 125.15 Intra-mammary 12.82 13.29 12.70 12.76 12.76 11.26 11.17 10.84 10.36 10.37 8.55 External 6.03 5.65 5.71 5.34 5.25 4.52 4.6 4.47 4.55 4.47 4.23 Total (in tons) 1 322.07 1 391.70 1 385.87 1 341.18 1 315.25 1 284.21 1 329.47 1 265.19 1 386.56 1 226.49 1 067.35 During the 11 years survey, the total antimicrobial sales range between 1 067.35 and 1 391.70 tons. 2009 sales represent the lowest sales volume recorded during the 11 years period. In 2009, the total antimicrobials sales have decreased from 12.98 % compared to 2008 and from 19.27 % compared to 1999, these decrease is principally due to a decrease of oral administered antimicrobials. 3.1.2 Results expressed in weight of animal treated 4 The weight of animal treated can be calculated by active ingredients or by medicinal product. The calculation by active ingredient is an estimate of the exposure to each active ingredient and is representative of the exposure to antimicrobial or to the antimicrobial family considered. The calculation by medicinal product is an estimate of the number of treatments administered (a medicinal product may contain one or several antibiotics) and is representative of the number of prescriptions of medicinal products containing antimicrobials. The expression by medicinal product or by active ingredient has a low impact regarding the global evolution as shown when comparing for the parenteral route, weight of animal treated expressed by active ingredient or by medicinal product (annex 3). In the remainder of this report, results expressed in weight of animal treated (WAT) have been calculated for each active ingredient and are representative of the evolution of the exposure to antibiotics. 4 Excluding external route 18

Table 8. Evolution of WAT according to the route of administration WAT 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 In tons of WAT Oral 6 724 870 7 433 466 7 701 545 7 966 744 7 983 600 7 877 316 8 397 713 8 188 646 8 861 289 7953 422 7 585 251 including premixes 3 136 547 3 155 024 2 996 375 2 774 720 2 628 494 2 482 174 2 506 340 2 417 094 2 739 454 2 324 516 2 125 688 Parenteral 3 667 945 3 695 392 3 682 501 3 570 065 3 577 668 3 334 326 3 462 810 3 615 217 3 366 860 3 344 192 3 130 936 Total Oral + Parentéral 10 392 814 11 128 857 11 384 046 11 536 809 11 561 268 11 211 642 11 860 522 11 803 864 12 228 148 11 297 614 10 716 188 For intra-mammary products, results are expressed in number of animals treated by product. Table 9. Evolution of the number of animals treated by intra-mammary route In number of animals treated 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Intra-mammary 7 450 793 7 586 776 6 854 031 7 092 073 7 181 681 6 330 748 6 363 945 6 358 545 6 070 081 6 282 949 5 313 764 The weight of animal treated by parenteral route decreases from 14.6 % in 2009 compared to 1999. The weight of animal treated by oral route increases from 12.8 % in 2009 compared to 1999. However, a decrease is noticed for the 2 last years (a decrease of 14.4 % in 2009 compared to 2007). For the premixes, the decrease is of 32.2 % compared to 1999. The number of animals treated by intra-mammary route decreases of 15.4 % compared to 2008 and of 28.7 % compared to 1999. 19

3.2. Evolution of antimicrobial sales per antimicrobial class 3.2.1 Results expressed in weight of the active ingredient Table 10. Evolution of sales by antimicrobial class from 1999 to 2009 (Wacti in tons) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Aminoglycosides 81.52 89.78 92.31 90.25 84.08 81.38 82.11 81.25 110.95 107.13 71.40 Cephalosporins 1 & 2G 5.17 5.20 5.13 5.91 6.33 6.41 6.90 7.01 6.97 6.85 6.64 Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 0.89 1.03 1.00 1.15 1.26 1.36 1.60 1.87 2.00 2.12 1.83 Others 17.51 20.13 20.18 22.10 21.34 21.45 20.61 20.16 20.86 18.68 18.12 Fluoroquinolones 3.29 3.69 4.06 4.19 4.44 4.29 4.36 4.82 4.69 4.90 4.90 Furans 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Macrolides 77.29 89.58 102.34 109.29 103.41 97.52 100.91 104.15 94.90 92.34 80.45 Penicillins 113.16 120.59 117.99 122.76 116.48 106.04 110.08 114.05 115.44 105.52 105.89 Phenicols 4.74 5.12 4.94 5.95 4.63 5.21 5.01 6.39 6.18 5.30 5.02 Polymyxins 63.08 66.14 67.59 64.47 65.33 61.42 64.52 65.12 72.27 64.28 64.97 Quinolones 20.53 16.75 15.02 16.05 14.22 12.73 13.68 13.81 11.05 8.02 7.54 Sulfonamides 269.62 275.90 249.86 232.38 213.07 212.57 218.35 210.71 226.90 195.50 183.73 Tetracyclines 627.76 659.18 669.28 632.79 648.14 640.09 665.81 602.70 680.46 586.25 488.61 Trimethoprim 37.46 38.56 36.15 33.85 32.47 33.71 35.50 33.13 33.85 29.56 28.20 Total (in tons) 1 322.07 1 391.70 1 385.87 1 341.18 1 315.25 1 284.21 1 329.47 1 265.19 1 386.56 1 226.49 1 067.35 In 2009, the weight sold of antimicrobials have decreased of 13.0 % (159 tons) compared to 2008 and of 19.3 % (255 tons) compared to 1999. On the 11 years period, the 2 antimicrobial classes showing the more important decreases are Tetracyclines (decrease of 22.2 % corresponding to 139 tons) and Sulfonamides (decrease of 32.0 % corresponding to 86 tons) Compared to 1999, Fluoroquinolone sales have increased (48.94 % corresponding to 1.61 tons) while Quinolones sales have decreased (63.3 % corresponding to 12.99 tons). Compared to 2008, the sales of Fluoroquinolones have stabilized in 2009 (+0.09 %) Compared to 1999, 3 rd and 4 th generation Cephalosporins sales have increased (105.6 % corresponding to 0.94 ton) as well as 1 st and 2 nd generation Cephalosporins sales (28.4 % corresponding to 1.47 tons). Compared to 2008, the sales of 3 rd and 4 th generation Cephalosporins have decreased (- 13.7 corresponding to 0.29 ton). 20

3.2.2 Results expressed in weight of active ingredient related to animal population As figures concerning the animal population are usually expressed in number of animals, it is necessary to estimate a mean weight for each animal species in order to obtain the potential weight to be treated (WAP= Weight of Animal Population). Calculated WAP are provided in annex 1. Table 11. Evolution of weight of animal population for the main species (in tons) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Cattle 10 285 016 10 462 230 10 746 167 10 437 034 9 982 250 9 859 000 9 143 431 9 420 210 9 526 948 9 700 673 9 620 022 Swine 3 202 499 3 214 804 3 306 399 3 247 556 3 219 822 3 174 154 3 110 997 3 086 594 3 100 280 3 100 153 3 049 116 Poultry 2 421 512 2 470 977 2 536 974 2 335 402 2 285 308 2 289 904 2 315 744 1 932 728 2 025 204 1 942 188 1 886 008 Fish 57 320 59 630 59 050 59 800 56 500 59 500 59 500 48 467 48 959 48 872 48 872 Cat-dog 156 300 157 500 169 600 170 380 167 800 167 410 167 410 161 360 161 360 159 800 159 800 Sheep-goat 749 764 757 235 741 735 728 090 713 644 704 974 718 011 704 067 673 747 653 805 641 911 Rabbit 112 038 109 133 108 549 106 489 100 312 103 170 102 401 101 516 103 136 102 972 92 471 Others 224 878 257 788 261 240 257 977 262 136 264 983 239 346 237 066 262 983 259 503 260 470 Total 17 209 326 17 489 296 17 929 713 17 345 728 16 787 772 16 623 095 15 882 603 15 717 771 15 877 027 15 967 966 15 758 670 Table 12. Evolution of sales by antimicrobial class from 1999 to 2009 related to weight of animal population (Wacti/WAP) mg/kg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Aminoglycosides 4.74 5.13 5.15 5.20 5.01 4.90 5.17 5.17 6.99 6.71 4.53 Cephalosporins 1 & 2G 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.34 0.38 0.39 0.43 0.45 0.44 0.43 0.42 Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.12 Other 1.02 1.15 1.13 1.27 1.27 1.29 1.30 1.28 1.31 1.17 1.15 Fluoroquinolones 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.31 0.30 0.31 0.31 Furans 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Macrolides 4.49 5.12 5.71 6.30 6.16 5.87 6.35 6.63 5.98 5.78 5.11 Penicillins 6.58 6.89 6.58 7.08 6.94 6.38 6.93 7.26 7.27 6.61 6.72 Phenicols 0.28 0.29 0.28 0.34 0.28 0.31 0.32 0.41 0.39 0.33 0.32 Polymyxins 3.67 3.78 3.77 3.72 3.89 3.69 4.06 4.14 4.55 4.03 4.12 Quinolones 1.19 0.96 0.84 0.93 0.85 0.77 0.86 0.88 0.70 0.50 0.48 Sulfonamides 15.67 15.78 13.94 13.40 12.69 12.79 13.75 13.41 14.29 12.24 11.66 Tetracyclines 36.48 37.69 37.33 36.48 38.61 38.51 41.92 38.35 42.86 36.71 31.01 Trimethoprim 2.18 2.20 2.02 1.95 1.93 2.03 2.23 2.11 2.13 1.85 1.79 Total (in mg/kg) 76.82 79.57 77.29 77.32 78.35 77.25 83.71 80.49 87.33 76.81 67.73 21

In 2009, sales correspond to an equivalent of 67.73 mg/kg of animal weight produced. Results expressed in weight of active ingredient taking into account the animal population show nearly the same trends than results expressed in weight of active ingredient. The sales of 1 st and 2 nd generation Cephalosporins increase of 40.5 %, the sales of 3 rd and 4 th generation Cephalosporins increase of 124.3 % and the sales of Fluoroquinolones increase of 62.6 %. For all the antimicrobial classes; except Penicillins, Fluoroquinolones and Polymyxins, the sales expressed in weight of active ingredient related to the animal population have decreased between 2008 and 2009. 22

3.2.3 Results expressed in Weight of animal treated (WAT) Table 13. Evolution of sales by antimicrobial class from 1999 to 2009 expressed in Weight of animal treated (WAT) in tons (parenteral and oral treatments only) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Aminoglycosides 922 440 988 743 989 469 962 768 889 765 887 627 881 302 872 726 996 212 952 316 739 166 Cephalosporins 1 & 2G 6 925 6 917 7 863 8 060 8 691 9 026 9 811 9 807 9 805 9 544 9 121 Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 73 831 111 297 119 836 136 105 156 278 165 155 197 707 242 681 261 260 285 150 239 780 Other 175 196 197 055 207 472 227 324 209 858 202 052 214 846 225 313 234 244 230 645 223 510 Fluoroquinolones 191 422 200 098 248 429 286 614 312 744 298 586 317 789 343 131 327 917 341 044 339 440 Furans 1 168 1 104 956 867 873 796 710 646 657 602 489 Macrolides 608 368 651 987 697 082 767 132 747 607 722 773 778 189 777 012 679 574 736 774 691 295 Penicillins 1 999 127 2 157 071 2 131 015 2 119 091 2 114 225 1 901 595 1 980 102 2 042 995 2 065 517 1 876 987 1 864 915 Phenicols 108 003 116 246 110 959 140 365 107 774 122 729 117 544 146 391 134 945 114 232 114 179 Polymyxins 2 073 832 2 278 841 2 372 841 2 379 767 2 469 545 2 387 275 2 598 247 2 675 125 2 829 216 2 689 975 2 735 746 Quinolones 230 536 202 622 185 702 187 012 168 192 150 209 159 541 161 560 130 806 96 102 93 375 Sulfonamides 1 015 580 1 068 486 976 088 935 771 851 094 860 377 892 264 880 057 1 011 015 879 127 782 311 Tetracyclines 2 415 219 2 552 947 2 743 673 2 797 483 2 963 281 2 934 857 3 123 866 2 887 756 3 013 761 2 606 784 2 420 927 Trimethoprim 571 169 595 441 592 658 588 451 561 339 568 583 588 603 538 663 533 218 478 333 461 934 In tons of WAT 10 392 814 11 128 857 11 384 046 11 536 809 11 561 268 11 211 642 11 860 522 11 803 864 12 228 148 11 297 614 10 716 188 When comparing 2009 and 1999 results, the weight of animal treated (WAT) increases of 3.1 %. Compared to 1999, the weight of animal treated with Fluoroquinolones has increased of 77.3 %, and the weight of animal treated with first generation Quinolones has decreased of 31.9 %. Compared to 1999, the weight of animal treated with 3 rd & 4 th generation Cephalosporins has increased of 224.8 % and of 31.7% for 1 st and 2 nd generation Cephalosporins. Results expressed in WAT show also a decrease for all classes of antimicrobials in comparison to 2008, except for Polymyxins (increase of 1.7 %). In 2009 and compared to 2008, the weight of animal treated with Fluoroquinolones and with 3 rd & 4 th generation Cephalosporins both have decreased (minus 0.47 % for Fluoroquinolones, and minus 15.9 % for 3 rd & 4 th generation Cephalosporins). 23

3.2.4 Results expressed as Animal Level of Exposure to Antimicrobials (ALEA) Table 14. Evolution of sales by antimicrobial class from 1999 to 2009 expressed in ALEA (oral and parenteral routes only) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Aminoglycosides 0.054 0.057 0.055 0.056 0.053 0.053 0.055 0.056 0.063 0.060 0.047 Cephalosporins 1 & 2G 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 0.004 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.010 0.012 0.015 0.016 0.018 0.015 Other 0.010 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.014 0.014 0.015 0.014 0.014 Fluoroquinolones 0.011 0.011 0.014 0.017 0.019 0.018 0.020 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.022 Furans 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Macrolides 0.035 0.037 0.039 0.044 0.045 0.043 0.049 0.049 0.043 0.046 0.044 Penicillins 0.116 0.123 0.119 0.122 0.126 0.114 0.125 0.130 0.130 0.118 0.118 Phenicols 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.008 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.007 Polymyxins 0.121 0.130 0.132 0.137 0.147 0.144 0.164 0.170 0.178 0.168 0.174 Quinolones 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.010 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.006 Sulfonamides 0.059 0.061 0.054 0.054 0.051 0.052 0.056 0.056 0.064 0.055 0.050 Tetracyclines 0.140 0.146 0.153 0.161 0.177 0.177 0.197 0.184 0.190 0.163 0.154 Trimethoprim 0.033 0.034 0.033 0.034 0.033 0.034 0.037 0.034 0.034 0.030 0.029 ALEA 0.604 0.636 0.635 0.665 0.689 0.674 0.747 0.751 0.770 0.708 0.680 When comparing 2009 and 1999 results, the ALEA index, irrespective of classes and species, increases of 12.6 %. Compared to 2008, the ALEA index decreases of 3.9 %. The exposure to all generation Cephalosporins, Fluoroquinolones, Macrolides, Phenicols, Polymyxins and Tetracyclines has increased; the exposure to Aminoglycosides, Quinolones, Sulfonamides and Trimethorpim has decreased compared to 1999. Compared to 1999, the level of exposure to Fluoroquinolones has increased of 93.6 %, in the same time the exposure of Quinolones has decreased to 53.8 %. Compared to 2008, the level of exposure to Fluoroquinolones has decreased of 0.85 %. Compared to 1999, the level of exposure to 3 rd & 4 th generation Cephalosporins has increased of 254.7 % and the level of exposure to 1 st and 2 nd generation Cephalosporins, has increased of 43.8 %. Compared to 2008, the level of exposure to 3 rd & 4 th generation Cephalosporins has decreased of 14.8 %. 24

3.2.5 Comparison of different outputs to describe the evolution of antimicrobial sales Table 15. Comparison between 2009 and 1999 sales with different indicators Wacti Wacti/WAP WAT ALEA Aminoglycosides -12.42% -4.35% -19.87% -12.49% Cephalosporins 1 & 2G 28.62% 40.46% 31.72% 43.85% Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 105.44% 124.35% 224.77% 254.67% Others 3.45% 12.97% 27.58% 39.32% Fluoroquinolones 48.91% 62.62% 77.33% 93.65% Furans -53.20% -48.89% -58.16% -54.31% Macrolides 4.09% 13.67% 13.63% 24.09% Penicillins -6.42% 2.19% -6.71% 1.87% Phenicols 5.91% 15.66% 5.72% 15.45% Polymyxins 2.99% 12.47% 31.92% 44.06% Quinolones -63.25% -59.87% -59.50% -55.77% Sulfonamides -31.86% -25.58% -22.97% -15.88% Tetracyclines -22.17% -15.00% 0.24% 9.46% Trimethoprim -24.72% -17.79% -19.12% -11.68% Evolution in 2009 related to 1999-19.27% -11.83% 3.11% 12.60% Table 15bis. Comparison between 2009 and 2008 sales with different indicators Wacti Wacti/WAP WAT ALEA Aminoglycosides -33.36% -32.47% -22.38% -21.35% Cephalosporins 1 & 2G -3.04% -1.75% -4.43% -3.16% Cephalosporins 3 & 4G -13.73% -12.59% -15.91% -14.79% Others -3.01% -1.72% -3.09% -1.81% Fluoroquinolones 0.03% 1.36% -0.47% 0.85% Furans -13.96% -12.81% -18.89% -17.81% Macrolides -12.88% -11.72% -6.17% -4.93% Penicillins 0.35% 1.69% -0.64% 0.68% Phenicols -5.29% -4.03% -0.05% 1.28% Polymyxins 1.07% 2.41% 1.70% 3.05% Quinolones -5.96% -4.71% -2.84% -1.55% Sulfonamides -6.02% -4.77% -11.01% -9.83% Tetracyclines -16.65% -15.55% -7.13% -5.90% Trimethoprim -4.61% -3.34% -3.43% -2.15% Evolution in 2009 related to 2008-12.98% -11.82% -5.1% -3.9% The comparison of sales, between 1999 and 2009 show different evolutions according to the output chosen. When comparing 2009 with 1999 results, the sales volume decreases of 19.27 %. When taking into account the weight of the animal population potentially treated, the decrease is only of 11.83 %. When expressing results in WAT, an increase of 3.11 % is seen. The ALEA index representing the animal exposure shows an increase of 12.6 %. 25

This latter output shows that the exposure to 3 rd & 4 th generation Cephalosporins has been multiplied by 3.5 between 1999 and 2009, and the exposure of animals to Fluoroquinolones has been multiplied by 2. When comparing 2009 results with 2008 results, the sales volume decreases of 12.98 %. When taking into account the weight of animal population potentially treated, the decrease is only of 11.82 %. When expressing results in WAT representing the number of treatments, a decrease of 5.1 % is seen. The ALEA index representing the animal exposure shows a decrease of 3.9 %. 3.3. Evolution of Antimicrobial sales per animal species for the oral and parenteral routes Results expressed in Weight of animal treated for the main target species Details figures regarding the evolution of sales by antimicrobial classes in weight of animal treated for cattle, cats and dogs, swine and poultry productions are provided in annex 5.. 26

Table 16. Evolution of the use of antimicrobial classes in cattle (except external and intramammary routes) 1999 20000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Aminoglycosides 16.71% 16.96% 16.68% 15.54% 15.39% 15.81% 14.84% 14.74% 18.19% 18.24% 13.81% Cephalosporins 1 & 2G - - - - - - - - - - - Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 1.73% 2.62% 2.90% 3.25% 3.98% 4.31% 4.83% 5.27% 5.52% 6.35% 5.84% Other 1.57% 1.45% 1.21% 1.21% 1.30% 1.30% 1.20% 1.11% 1.08% 1.07% 1.03% Fluoroquinolones 2.38% 2.33% 3.42% 4.27% 5.19% 4.75% 4.98% 5.54% 5.06% 5.32% 5.67% Furans - - - - - - - - - - - Macrolides 10.96% 11.00% 11.23% 12.08% 12.87% 12.47% 13.13% 12.52% 10.35% 12.39% 13.47% Penicillins 31.57% 30.94% 30.61% 27.50% 25.12% 25.06% 24.26% 23.99% 22.91% 22.02% 23.36% Phenicols 3.08% 3.20% 3.08% 3.82% 3.11% 3.61% 3.30% 4.02% 3.69% 3.14% 3.08% Polymyxins 8.46% 8.69% 9.08% 9.55% 9.81% 9.52% 9.76% 9.99% 10.21% 10.42% 11.65% Quinolones 1.76% 1.75% 1.64% 1.49% 1.43% 1.25% 1.44% 1.43% 1.06% 0.78% 0.92% Sulfonamides 6.21% 6.12% 5.64% 5.26% 4.93% 5.23% 5.23% 5.14% 6.73% 6.84% 5.54% Tetracyclines 14.02% 13.48% 12.81% 14.10% 15.01% 14.73% 15.21% 14.61% 13.77% 11.82% 13.91% Trimethoprim 1.56% 1.46% 1.70% 1.93% 1.86% 1.96% 1.82% 1.65% 1.44% 1.60% 1.70% Percentage 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Bovine: distribution of antimicrobial classes in WAT % 35,00% 30,00% 25,00% 20,00% 15,00% 10,00% 5,00% 0,00% According to the estimations, during the last 11 years, the parts of Aminoglycosides, Penicillins, and Quinolones in the bodyweight of bovines treated with antimicrobials have decreased, whereas the parts of 3 rd and 4 th generation Cephalosporins, Fluoroquinolones, Macrolides and Polymixins increased. 27

Table 17. Evolution of the use of antimicrobial classes in dogs and cats (except external route) 1999 2000 Aminoglycosides 8.25% 8.76% Cephalosporins 1 & 2G 3.25% 3.40% Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 0.00% 0.00% Other 12.59% 10.80% Fluoroquinolones 17.12% 16.66% Furans 0.55% 0.54% Macrolides 2.77% 3.19% Penicillins 37.98% 38.51% Phenicols 0.22% 0.21% Polymyxins 0.86% 0.85% Quinolones 0.12% 0.40% Sulfonamides 10.61% 11.00% Tetracyclines 3.78% 3.83% Trimethoprim 1.92% 1.86% Percentage 100.00% 100.00% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8.47% 8.01% 7.16% 7.56% 6.41% 5.60% 5.18% 5.01% 4.40% 3.86% 3.75% 3.56% 3.67% 3.54% 3.15% 2.92% 2.82% 2.63% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.20% 1.11% 1.32% 1.46% 9.93% 12.70% 11.68% 12.38% 18.84% 23.99% 25.35% 27.18% 27.65% 20.51% 21.91% 18.75% 20.37% 16.51% 13.51% 14.33% 13.81% 15.20% 0.47% 0.40% 0.36% 0.32% 0.26% 0.21% 0.20% 0.18% 0.14% 3.21% 3.64% 2.62% 2.76% 2.29% 2.69% 1.75% 1.64% 1.53% 37.47% 34.38% 43.41% 40.10% 41.42% 41.70% 40.47% 39.81% 39.90% 0.22% 0.21% 0.19% 0.18% 0.17% 0.15% 0.13% 0.11% 0.09% 0.81% 0.73% 0.67% 0.58% 0.51% 0.44% 0.34% 0.35% 0.30% 0.33% 0.47% 0.32% 0.24% 0.23% 0.03% 0.10% 0.02% 0.05% 9.42% 8.89% 7.23% 7.71% 5.87% 5.12% 4.91% 4.81% 3.92% 3.67% 3.57% 3.12% 3.20% 3.28% 2.64% 2.72% 2.50% 2.35% 1.64% 1.33% 0.94% 0.93% 0.67% 0.56% 0.50% 0.45% 0.38% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Dogs and cats : Distribution of antimicrobial classes expressed in WAT % 45,00% 40,00% 35,00% 30,00% 25,00% 20,00% 15,00% 10,00% 5,00% 0,00% According to the estimations, during the last 11 years, the parts of 3 rd and 4 th generation Cephalosporins, of others antimicrobials and of Penicillins in the bodyweight of dogs and cats treated with antimicrobials have increased. 28

Table 18. Evolution of the use of antimicrobial classes in pigs (except external route) 1999 2000 Aminoglycosides 5.19% 5.47% Cephalosporins 1 & 2G - - Cephalosporins 3 & 4G 0.32% 0.38% Other 1.86% 2.34% Fluoroquinolones 1.06% 1.13% Furans - - Macrolides 3.96% 4.16% Penicillins 12.81% 13.11% Phenicols 0.00% 0.00% Polymyxins 29.84% 29.52% Quinolones 2.64% 1.66% Sulfonamides 7.69% 7.47% Tetracyclines 28.66% 29.05% Trimethoprim 5.99% 5.72% Percentage 100.00% 100.00% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 5.59% 5.56% 5.10% 4.98% 4.88% 4.64% 4.19% 4.06% 4.22% - - - - - - - - - 0.36% 0.42% 0.48% 0.52% 0.68% 1.28% 1.28% 1.39% 1.35% 2.65% 2.98% 2.64% 2.44% 2.20% 1.91% 1.76% 1.82% 1.69% 1.19% 1.36% 1.49% 1.48% 1.69% 1.76% 1.39% 1.82% 1.94% - - - - - - - - - 4.83% 5.57% 5.19% 5.17% 5.11% 5.41% 4.81% 4.81% 4.89% 12.65% 12.97% 11.72% 11.54% 11.48% 12.01% 11.43% 10.94% 12.45% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% 0.47% 29.70% 29.41% 31.75% 31.27% 31.45% 31.74% 33.32% 33.84% 33.73% 1.12% 1.00% 0.77% 0.89% 0.90% 0.84% 0.74% 0.72% 0.61% 6.67% 6.78% 6.00% 6.53% 6.30% 6.66% 6.79% 6.98% 7.02% 29.83% 28.31% 29.68% 29.59% 30.04% 28.35% 28.97% 28.07% 26.09% 5.40% 5.64% 5.18% 5.59% 5.29% 5.40% 5.32% 5.52% 5.54% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Porcine: Distribution ofantimicrobial classes expressed in WAT % 35,00% 30,00% 25,00% 20,00% 15,00% 10,00% 5,00% 0,00% According to the estimations, during the last 11 years, the parts of Aminoglycosides, of Sulfonamides, Trimethoprim, Penicillins, Quinolones and Tetracyclines in the bodyweight of pigs treated with antimicrobials have decreased, whereas the parts of 3 rd and 4 th generation Cephalosporins, Fluoroquinolones, Macrolides, Phenicols and Polymixins have increased. 29