STRAY DOGS SURVEY 2014 SUMMARY REPORT

Similar documents
STRAY DOGS SURVEY 2015

Stray Dog Survey A report prepared for: Dogs Trust. GfK NOP. Provided by: GfK NOP Social Research. Your contact:

Stray Dog Survey 2010

Dogs Trust Pawlicy Document

Teachers Notes Session 4 Plan your rescue centre

Microchipping where it matters most One year on

Battersea response to the Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee s call for evidence on the Control of Dogs (Scotland) Act 2010

Neighbourhood Manager, Neighbourhoods Business Manager, Neighbourhoods Services Manager, Care and Support Business Manager, Care and Support

MICROCHIPPING TWO YEARS ON WHERE IT MATTERS MOST

Microchipping where it matters most

JOINT BVA-BSAVA-SPVS RESPONSE TO THE CONSULTATION ON PROPOSALS TO TACKLE IRRESPONSIBLE DOG OWNERSHIP

GUIDE TO COMPULSORY MICROCHIPPING FOR WELFARE ORGANISATIONS

It s a dog s life: vet nursing at Dogs Trust centre, Leeds

Protect your dog against theft

1. Are all, some or none of the dogs/puppies in your care already/routinely microchipped? Please explain.

Kennel Club Response to the Home Affairs Committee s call for evidence on the draft Anti-Social Behaviour Bill.

Why should I Microchip my pet?

Why should I Microchip my pet?

Freedom of Information Request on Pet Shop Licensing 2016

RM Group/CWU Dog Awareness Week Monday 25 June to Saturday 30 June:

RSPCA report on animal outcomes from our shelters, care and adoption centres

RSPCA report on animal outcomes from our shelters, care and adoption centres

Companion Animal Management in Victoria

Holroyd City Council Low Kill Policy Brooke Littman, Environmental Health & Waste Education Officer, Holroyd City Council

Information Guide. Do you know dog law?

Responsible Pet Ownership Program Working Group Summary of Recommendations

The Scottish Government SHEEP AND GOAT IDENTIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY GUIDANCE FOR KEEPERS IN SCOTLAND

Annual Dog Control. Report to Secretary LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2016/17. Te Kaunihera o Papaioea Palmerston North City Council

RSPCA SA v Ross and Fitzpatrick Get the Facts

Rethinking RTOs: Identifying and Removing Barriers to Owner Reclaim, Part Two

Understanding the UK Dog Population

For publication. The Anti-social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014 Designation of the Public Spaces Protection Order (Dog control) (HW1140)

Pet Industry Association of Australia

The human-animal bond is well recognized in the

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE DOCKING OF WORKING DOGS TAILS (ENGLAND) REGULATIONS No. [XXXX]

Pet Ownership & Buyer Behaviour

PET OWNERSHIP GUIDE. It will also be helpful for residents who are having problems with a neighbour s pet.

Information Guide. Do you know dog law?

Q1 The effectiveness of the Act in reducing the number of out of control dogs/dog attacks in Scotland.

RURAL AFFAIRS, CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA. 2nd Meeting, 2016 (Session 4) Wednesday 20 January 2016

PETQUIP MARKETING PROJECT OF THE YEAR 2017

Moving house and travelling with dogs

Keeping Pets in Your Home

Canine bull types breed-specific UK legislation

...where to find us. DOG MANIFESTO v11:dog MANIFESTO v11 18/09/ :13 Page 1. Ballymena, Co Antrim Tel

Municipal Animal Control in New Jersey, Best Practices March 2018

Stockton Animal Shelter Operations. City Council May 23, 2017 Study Session

City of Burleson, Texas

LANAnC33 Plan and control the movement of animals

Animal Management( Cats & Dogs) Act Queensland Government s Managing Unwanted Cats and Dogs Strategy

Dog and Cat Management Board. Approval of Greyhound Muzzle Exemptions

LANAnC11 - SQA Unit Code HA75 04 Maintain the health and welfare of animals

Investigation of hand washing facilities and practices in various settings on the island of Ireland

How Pets Arrived at the SPCA

REQUEST TO RETIRE, EXPORT, TRANSFER OR EUTHANASE GREYHOUND

Third Party Sales of Puppies and Kittens

Domestic Animal Businesses

Sleep out at Battersea s iconic centre to raise funds for abandoned dogs and cats

Melanie Isaacs. Are the stray pets in our shelters really unloved, unwanted, neglected or abused? Or is there more to the story?

German Shepherd Dog. Vulnerable Breed. Length of coat. Supposedly sheds? Town or Country. Minimum garden size

2015 No. 138 DOGS, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Dangerous Dogs Exemption Schemes (England and Wales) Order 2015

DOG CONTROL POLICY 2016

Higher National Unit specification: general information. Veterinary Nursing: Companion Animal Health and Welfare

LANGSTANE HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED PET POLICY

ANIMALS. Chapter 284 DOG - LICENSING - REGULATION CHAPTER INDEX. Article 1 INTERPRETATION. Article 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS

GIS Checklist. A guide to reducing shelter intake in your community For Use with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Shelter Research & Development

How Pets Arrived at The SPCA

Choosing the right dog

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1063

Pierce County. November 8, 2018

Mile High Weimaraner Rescue Surrender Packet

Dog Ownership. Barking. Health. Fouling. * Provide your dog with safe and. * Walk your dog at least twice a day * Keep your dog inside when you are

City of Burleson, Texas

CAT 16 FIV. The charity dedicated to helping sick, injured and homeless pets since 1897.

To them and all our supporters I say a massive THANK YOU. Have a fantastic Summer and hopefully I will see many of you at our various events.

Adopting a rescue dog

The Linacre Cats Protection Project 2015 final report

- litter bin policies, strategies and procedures. Briefing January Key issues

Dangerous Dogs and Safeguarding Children Contents

CAREERS INFORMATION. learnwithdogstrust.org.uk. Dogs Trust Registered Charity Nos and SC037843

LANAnC64 - SQA Unit Code HA8F 04 Carry out the implantation of a microchip in an animal

LANAnC15 - SQA Unit Code HA77 04 Handle and restrain animals

the first place redundant.

CONTROL OF DOGS (SCOTLAND) BILL ALEX NEIL MSP

Boxer. Varieties. Vulnerable Breed. Length of coat. Supposedly sheds? Town or Country. Minimum garden size. Bobtail

Racing Greyhound Population Trends In New Zealand

Animal rescue organization

QUEEN S CORGI OFF AT RISK LIST FOR FIRST TIME IN ALMOST A DECADE

The Way Back Home: The Problem. Reuniting Pets with Their People. The Way Back Home: Reuniting Lost Pets with Their People (Susan Taney)

ABOUT THE KENNEL CLUB AND EUKANUBA DISCOVER DOGS. WE ARE: The UK s largest organisation dedicated to the health and welfare of dogs.

GRATEFUL PAWS DOG & CAT RESCUE, INC. Tel Fax APPLICATION TO FOSTER

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Identifying Best Practice Domestic Cat Management in Australia

Travelling abroad with your dog

Overview of the U. S. Turkey Industry

Communicating VS activities on stray dogs to the general public Croatia national experience

Items included: Application for a Spay/Neuter Grant. Baseline data for all participating organizations. Contact information:

2016 No. 58 ANIMALS. The Microchipping of Dogs (Scotland) Regulations 2016

Information Guide. Find a rescue dog.

BY-LAW 560/ DOG TAG means a numbered metal tag issued by the Village when the Owner of a Dog licenses such Dog with the Town/Village.

MLA and AWI Wool and Sheepmeat Survey Report - Sheepmeat November, 2017 Prepared by Kynetec

Transcription:

STRAY DOGS SURVEY 2014 SUMMARY REPORT A report prepared for Dogs Trust Prepared by: Your contacts: GfK NOP Social Research Elisabeth Booth / Rachel Feechan 020 7890 (9761 / 9789) elisabeth.booth@gfk.com / rachel.feechan@gfk.com Version: FINAL DRAFT, August 2014

Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 2 1.1 Background and Methodology 2 1.2 Objectives 4 1.3 Definition of regions 4 1.4 Interpretation of the data 4 2 Summary of findings... 5 2.1 The number of stray dogs handled 5 2.2 Seizing stray dogs 7 2.3 What happens to the UK s stray dogs? 8 2.4 Micro-chipping 9 2.5 Ways in which dogs were reunited with their owners 10 2.6 Current set up of dog warden services 11 2.7 Status dogs 11 2.8 Conclusions 11 3 Regional figures... 13 Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 1

1 Introduction 1.1 Background and Methodology Dogs Trust commissions an annual survey of local authority dog wardens and environmental health officers, in order to investigate what happens to the nation s stray dogs. GfK NOP Social Research has been running the Stray Dogs survey since 2003, and was again chosen in 2014. The research consisted of two stages: an initial telephone sweep of local authorities was carried out between 1 st and 4 th April 2014, to update contact details and collect email addresses. For those with email addresses, initial email invitations were sent to all named individuals. If no email address had been supplied, postal questionnaires were sent out to named respondents. These invitations were sent to all 371 local authorities with responsibility for environmental health in Great Britain in the week commencing 21 st April 2014. Two options for completion were made available to respondents to enable them to go through the survey in the most convenient way for them. They could either complete the survey online, or complete a paper version which was to be returned to GfK NOP via a free post envelope, fax or email. Following postal, email and telephone reminders, 333 questionnaires were returned by the deadline (13 th June 2014), giving a response rate of 90% across England, Scotland and Wales (Great Britain). Table 1 shows the response rate broken down by TV region, campaign region and country. Local authorities within Northern Ireland were contacted separately (directly by Dogs Trust) and their data was later merged with the Great Britain data set. As with previous years, all of the 26 authorities in Northern Ireland responded, giving an overall response rate of 90% across all 397 local authorities in the UK. Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 2

Table 1: Response rates TV Region Authorities Responding Total Authorities Response Rate % Tyne Tees (North East) 15 16 94 Granada (North West) 33 35 94 Yorkshire (Yorkshire) 20 21 95 Central (Midlands) 56 65 86 HTV (Wales and West) 28 29 97 Anglia (East & Anglia) 28 37 76 Carlton (London) 66 70 94 Meridian (Southern) 39 44 89 West Country (South West) 16 17 94 Border (Borders) 7 7 100 Grampian (Northern Scotland) 7 9 78 STV Central (Central Scotland) 18 21 86 Ulster (Northern Ireland) 26 26 100 Wales 22 22 100 Tyne Tees & Border 22 23 96 GADAL North East 26 27 96 GADAL North West 35 37 95 GADAL Wales 22 22 100 GADAL Northern Ireland 26 26 100 England 285 318 90 Scotland 26 31 84 Northern Ireland 26 26 100 Wales 22 22 100 Total 359 397 90 Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 3

1.2 Objectives This survey aims to provide information about the number of stray dogs handled by local authorities, the methods they used for dealing with these dogs, and the ways in which they were reunited with their owners. Data is collated at both a regional and a national level. In order to track data from year to year, the questionnaire was kept largely the same as in previous years. In 2014, a number of changes were made to the questionnaire. A new question asking about changes in the number of dogs with foreign microchips was added and the questions on expected changes to the service offered were amended to ask about current practices. 1.3 Definition of regions The findings are analysed according to the 13 ITV regions throughout the UK. The definitions are as follows: Tyne Tees (North East), Granada (North West), Yorkshire (Yorkshire), Central (Midlands), HTV (Wales and West), Anglia (East and Anglia), Carlton (London), Meridian (Southern), West Country (South West), Border (Borders), Grampian (Northern Scotland), STV Central (Central Scotland), and Ulster (Northern Ireland). Since 2009, reference has also been made to the newly formed TV regions of Tyne Tees and Border (incorporating Tyne Tees and Border regions), and to Wales and West as two separate regions. Findings are also analysed by four campaign regions GADAL North East, GADAL North West, GADAL Wales and GADAL Northern Ireland. 1.4 Interpretation of the data In order to maintain comparability with methods used in previous surveys, the national total is calculated separately from the regional totals. As a result, the individual region figures do not always equal the all UK total. Some of the findings in this report are based on actual numbers reported by each authority; however, at some points reference is made to estimated figures. We have grossed up the reported figures to make estimates for each TV region based on the assumption that the authorities responding are representative of authorities as a whole. Due to high levels of non-response at some questions it is not viable to provide information in terms of percentages (as we do not know for certain whether a non-response means there is no information available, that zero dogs would fit into that category, or in face something else) and so we have focused on reported numbers rather than reported percentages at some points during the report. Where figures are shown for Wales, West and Tyne Tees & Border TV regions these are additional to, and do not make up part of, the overall UK totals. It is also worth noting that the 26 authorities within Northern Ireland only provide data on the numbers of strays handled by the local authority, put to sleep, reunited with their owners and passed on to welfare organisations. They do not provide information on micro-chipping, reasons strays were put to sleep, and their handling of status dogs. Where these figures are reported, they are based on the 333 responding authorities in Great Britain. Comparisons are made with previous surveys where appropriate in this report. Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 4

Estimated number of strays 2 Summary of findings 2.1 The number of stray dogs handled Based on all 359 authorities who responded to this survey, an estimated 110,675 stray dogs were handled by local councils across the UK between 1 st April 2013 and 31 st March 2014. This represents a 1% decrease from the estimate of 111,986 dogs handled during the same period in 2012 to 2013. Chart 1 shows the estimated number of stray dogs handled annually across the UK since 1997. Chart 1: Estimated number of stray dogs in the UK since 1997 140,000 135,000 130,000 136,500 135,000 133,500 125,000 120,000 115,000 110,000 105,000 100,000 95,000 122,000 113,500 117,500 105,000 111,000 105,000 105,000 102,000 122,000 97,000 107,000 126,000 118,000 111,000 110,000 90,000 Year Base: All local authorities in the UK (397) Using the latest available census data (recorded in 2011) we are able to estimate the number of people per stray dog across the UK. This year local authorities across the UK handled an average of one stray for every 571 people. It is worth noting, however, that there are significant regional variations. For instance, in the Central STV region local authorities dealt with one stray dog for every 1,229 people on average; whilst in the Tyne Tees region, there is an estimated average of 281 people per stray dog. Table 2 provides the full regional breakdown in terms of the number of strays to people across the UK. The regional differences in the number of stray dogs reported by different authorities will reflect a number of factors, including the population size and the number of dogs owned in the area. Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 5

Table 2: Estimated number of people per stray dog by TV region TV Region Estimated number of strays 2013-2014 Total authorities in region Estimated strays per authority Estimated number of people per stray Tyne Tees 9,899 16 619 281 Granada 15,762 35 450 445 Yorkshire 9,612 21 458 670 Central 18,798 65 289 487 HTV 10,573 29 365 526 Anglia 6,269 37 169 726 Carlton 13,131 70 188 909 Meridian 9,419 44 214 644 West Country 3,902 17 230 470 Border 1,417 7 202 446 Grampian 1,490 9 166 933 STV Central 3,238 21 154 1,229 Ulster 5,886 26 226 311 Wales 8,140 22 370 376 Tyne Tees & Border 11,183 23 486 305 UK Total 110,675 397 279 571 Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 6

Estimated number of strays 2.2 Seizing stray dogs The survey asked local authorities to detail the number of stray dogs that were seized or taken in between 1 st April 2013 and 31 st March 2014. This was broken down across a number of key sources including: seized by the local authority as strays, brought in by the general public and brought in by the police. As in previous years local authorities themselves were responsible for seizing the majority of stray dogs, accounting for 76% of those reported; an increase from 70% last year. Seventeen per cent of stray dogs were brought in by the general public, a figure that has remained stable over recent years. Chart 2 shows the trends in how stray dogs are being seized since 1997. Chart 2: How stray dogs were brought to the local authorities 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 78% 78% 77% 77% 77% 77% 76% 73% 73% 75% 75% 71% 72% 70% 70% 70% 69% 68% 12% 11% 12% 13% 14% 17% 18% 15% 19% 15% 18% 19% 18% 14% 16% 15% 16% 17% 10% 11% 11% 10% 9% 10% 9% 10% 10% 12% 13% 13% 14% 7% Local Authority Public Other 15% 14% 7% 7% Year Base: All local authorities in the UK (397) The other figure shown in Chart 2 accounts for a variety of sources including dogs brought in by the police (1%), seized under the Dangerous Dogs Act (1%) and dogs already in local authority kennels on 1st April 2013 (1%). Transfers from vets, the RSPCA, dog wardens, out of hour s contractors, and other agencies each accounted for less than 1% of reported strays. Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 7

2.3 What happens to the UK s stray dogs? Local authorities were also asked to provide details on what happened to the stray dogs taken in between 1 st April 2013 and 31 st March 2014. An estimated 50% of stray dogs were reunited with their owners in this period, either by being reclaimed during the statutory local authority kennelling period (35%) or returned directly to their owner without entering a kennel (15%). These figures have remained in line with last year s estimates. The reported number of stray dogs re-homed by local authorities across the UK has fallen from 9,877 in 2013 to 8,906 this year. This accounts for the same proportion re-homed by local authorities as last year (9%) due to the decrease in the estimated total number of strays. A quarter (26%) were passed on to welfare organisations or dog kennels after the statutory period. This proportion remains the same as last year and is in line with estimates over the last 10 years. The estimated proportion of stray dogs being put to sleep was 7%, a slight decrease from 8% last year. This year 7,058 stray dogs were reported as having been put to sleep by authorities taking part in this survey (7,319 last year). From this figure we can estimate that approximately 7,805 dogs were put to sleep across the UK during the period of 1 st April 2013 to 31 st March 2014. This compares with an estimated 8,985 put to sleep last year. Amongst the authorities responding, details were given for around half of reported destructions (55%). It was reported that 2,083 dogs were put to sleep due to behavioural problems or aggression, 1,042 due to ill health, and 755 under the Dangerous Dogs Act. Chart 3 shows the trends in how stray dogs have been handled since 1997. Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 8

Proportion of stray dogs Chart 3: What happens to stray dogs? 60% 50% 51% 48% 46% 48% 48% 49% 50% 46% 48% 48% 44% 44% 51% 50% 48% 47% 48% 40% 42% 30% 20% 10% 0% 27% 23% 21% 21% 22% 23% 24% 24% 25% 25% 25% 24% 25% 26% 21% 22% 22% 19% 15% 14% 14% 15% 16% 17% 17% 16% 16% 13% 13% 16% 11% 10% 16% 8% 9% 9% 9% 14% 13% 6% 11% 9% 9% 8% 8% 8% 9% 7% 6% 7% 7% 8% 7% Year Returned to owner Rehomed by LA Passed on to Welfare Organisation Put to sleep Base: Responding local authorities in the UK (359) In addition to these key outcomes, 1% of strays were also reported as still being in the local authority kennels after 31st March 2013. A variety of other outcomes were also mentioned, including strays being kept or retained by finders (161 dogs), and dogs being dead when found or dying whilst in the kennels (18 dogs). Details were not given to account for all stray dogs. 2.4 Micro-chipping This year dog wardens reported that 16,443 of the dogs taken in were already micro-chipped compared to 10,213 last year and 5,920 in the 2011-2012 period 1. In the 2014 survey, a new question was added which asked whether the number of dogs with foreign micro-chips taken in had increased or decreased since last year. Twenty six per cent of the 313 LAs who answered this question said that the number of dogs with foreign micro-chips taken in has increased (4% said it had increased significantly, compared to 22% who said it had increased slightly). Six per cent said the number had decreased, with 2% saying it had decreased significantly. A quarter (24%) said the amount had stayed the same, and 44% of LAs had not kept data relating to this. Local authorities in Northern Ireland did not answer this question. 1 These figures should, however, be treated with some caution as details were only given for around one in six reported strays. This has improved on previous years, however, with details only given for one in ten reported strays last year. Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 9

Proportion of stray dogs 2.5 Ways in which dogs were reunited with their owners The survey also asked about methods by which stray dogs had been successfully reunited with their owners 2. This year the method responsible for reuniting dogs with their owners was given for 25,937 strays, which accounts for 52% of all dogs that were returned to or reunited with their owner (49,964). It was reported that 9,506 dogs were reunited due to the owner contacting the local authority or pound directly. Microchips alone accounted for 10,084 reunions (a figure which has increased year-on-year since 2011: see Chart 4), ID disks for 1,110 reunions and the combination of the two for 882 reunions. In addition, it was also reported that 1,090 dogs were reunited due to already being known to the dog warden. Chart 4: Ways in which dogs were reunited with their owners 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 9,946 10,084 9,480 9,127 9,177 8,231 8,469 8,346 9,506 8,185 6,589 8,288 7,098 6,774 6,683 6,137 6,218 5,891 5,516 5,353 4,118 3,038 3,621 2,491 2,538 2,854 2,456 2,396 2,107 1,833 1,965 2,669 1,097 1,359 995 1,110 1,567 1,533 1,354 1,604 1,703 1,222 1,053 1,221 658 876 888 1,090 Year Microchipping ID Disk Owner contacting LA Dog known to warden Base: Responding local authorities in Great Britain (333) Other reasons for dogs being returned to their owners included the dog having a collar (206) or the dog having an identifying tattoo (55 dogs). It was also reported that this information was not available or had not been kept for 2,706 dogs. 2 It is worth noting that these figures refer only to instances where the methods used to reunite stray dogs have been identified and that unspecified methods of tracing owners have been excluded from this calculation. As a result, figures cannot accurately be compared to previous years. Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 10

2.6 Current set up of dog warden services This year, three new questions were introduced to investigate the set-up of the dog warden services in local authorities in England, Scotland and Wales. They were asked how their dog warden service is employed, who handles their strays, and the hours in which their dog warden service operates 3. Amongst those answering, 63 authorities said their dog warden was employed directly by them, compared to 24 authorities who contracted the service out. Fifty eight authorities said that a private boarding kennels handled their strays, whereas 14 authorities used a council-owned pound and 11 used welfare charity kennels to house their stray dogs. The remaining 5 authorities said that they used an alternative option for handling their strays. Amongst those responding, 291 local authorities reported that their dog warden services were operational during working hours, Monday to Friday and 94 during working hours on Saturdays and Sundays. In addition, 126 LAs had a dog warden service which worked oncall out of working hours, Monday to Friday and 133 authorities operated an on-call service out of hours on weekends. Details were not given by all local authorities. 2.7 Status dogs This year s survey again included a number of questions about status dogs. The media often refers to status dogs as those whose looks or breed type are thought to convey a particular impression of their owner - such as Bull breeds, Rottweilers, Akitas or crosses of these. These questions were not asked of authorities in Northern Ireland. Across the 333 authorities in Great Britain, a reported 22,350 status dogs were handled between 1 st April 2013 and 31 st March 2014. This accounts for 22% of all strays reported in Great Britain, although some authorities did not provide figures. This figure has increased slightly since last year when 18,093 status dogs were reported (accounting for 20% of all strays). Of the 22,350, a reported 1,814 status dogs (8%) were put to sleep during this period due to aggression. Although the number of status dogs reportedly put to sleep was lower last year at 1,525, this still represented 8% of the 18,093 status dogs handled in 2013. 2.8 Conclusions The number of stray dogs reported by UK authorities overall has decreased by one percentage point since 2013. The grossed number now stands at an estimated 110,675 stray dogs across the UK. Reported figures suggest that the majority (76%) of these dogs were seized directly by the local authority as strays, with a further 17% surrendered by the general public. 3 Analysis of these questions is based only on those LAs who answered each question. Just 87 (24%) LAs gave information about how their dog warden is employed, with 86 (24%) providing information about who handles their strays. As a result of the low base sizes at this question it is not practical to provide a discussion of these questions on an individual TV region basis. Figures for each TV region can be supplied in tabular format if needed. A total of 322 (90%) of LAs gave information about the operating hours of their dog warden service, and so it is possible to give a breakdown on this for some, but not all, individual TV regions. Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 11

In line with last year, half (50%) of the estimated stray dogs handled in the UK between 1 st April 2013 to 31 st March 2014 were reunited with their owners, and a quarter (26%) were passed on to a welfare organisation or dog kennel for possible rehoming. A further 9% were re-homed by the local authority. When methods used to return stray dogs to their owners have been identified (for 25,937 dogs), this year it was reported that 10,084 reunions were due to microchips. This compares to 7,098 last year. An estimated 7% of strays were put to sleep this year, a slight decrease of 1% since last year. Amongst those answering, most (63) authorities reported that their dog warden was employed directly by them and that they used private boarding kennels to handle their strays (58). The majority (291) reported that their dog warden service operated during working hours Monday to Friday, with 94 operating during these hours on the weekend. In addition, 126 said their service operated on-call out of working hours during the week and 133 offered this service over the weekend. The number of status dogs handled overall has increased by 4,257 to 22,350 from 18,093 in 2013. This equates to 22% of all strays in 2013, compared with 20% in 2012. This increase was seen in 12 of the 14 TV regions that were asked about status dogs, by an average of 365 dogs per region. Larger increases were seen in the Granada and Meridian TV regions, with 921 and 1,083 dogs per person respectively. The number of status dogs handled in Yorkshire and Anglia regions had decreased by an average of 197 dogs per person. There has also been an increase in the number of status dogs destroyed due to aggression, with 1,814 put to sleep this year, compared with 1,525 in 2013. However, this equates to 8% of all strays in both years and is still in line with the 1,848 reported in 2012. These increases were seen in 9 of the 14 regions asked about status dogs, and the number put to sleep had increased by an average of 24 dogs per all of the 14 regions. The increase in the number of status dogs put to sleep averaged 57 dogs by the nine regions that reported an overall increase, but the greatest increase was seen in the Central TV region, which put 317 more status dogs to sleep this year due to aggression. Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 12

3 Regional figures Table 4: Key estimated figures by TV region Total* Tyne Tees Granada Yorkshire Central HTV Anglia Carlton Meridian West Country Border Grampian Base 359 15 33 20 56 28 28 66 39 16 7 7 18 26 22 22 Response rate (%) Total strays Put to sleep Reunited with owner Passed on to welfare orgs People per stray 90 94 94 95 86 97 76 94 89 94 100 78 86 100 100 96 110,675 9,889 15,762 9,612 18,798 10,573 6,269 13,131 9,419 3,902 1,417 1,490 3,238 5,886 8,140 11,183 7,805 429 1,279 1,351 1,396 460 325 1,083 378 67 70 40 70 690 364 493 55,253 4,982 7,120 4,279 9,903 4,827 3,722 6,527 6,313 1,967 644 840 1,579 2,244 3,493 5,557 29,236 3,604 3,489 2,629 6,344 2,803 2,056 3,278 1,358 495 461 96 676 1,661 2,415 4,015 571 281 445 670 487 526 726 909 644 470 446 933 1,229 311 376 305 STV Central Ulster Wales Tyne Tees & Border *Please note: in order to maintain comparability with methods used in previous surveys, the national total is calculated separately from the regional total. Therefore totals do not always equal the sum of all regions. All figures shown have been grossed up to represent 100% of authorities within each region. Tyne Tees & Border is calculated separately in this way and so may not directly reflect combined figures from the Tyne Tees region and Border region Dogs Trust Stray Dogs Survey 2014 Summary Report August 2014 13