HERITABILITY AND REPEATABILITY ESTIMATES OF REPRODUCTION TRAITS IN PUREBRED PIGS

Similar documents
Genetic parameters of number of piglets nursed

Genetic parameters and breeding value stability estimated from a joint evaluation of purebred and crossbred sows for litter weight at weaning

Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. Vol. 23, No. 5 : May

Body length and its genetic relationships with production and reproduction traits in pigs

TEKS: 130.2(C)(12)(C)

Genotypic and phenotypic relationships between gain, feed efficiency and backfat probe in swine

Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters for sow productivity traits in South African Large White pigs

A Summary of Swine Crossbreeding Research at. Auburn University. Bulletin 595 September 1988 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station.

4-H Swine Bowl Learning Information

Course: Principles of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. Instructor: Ms. Hutchinson. Objectives:

REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE FOR FOUR BREEDS OF SWINE: CROSSBRED FEMALES AND PUREBRED AND CROSSBRED BOARS

Breeding for both animal welfare and production efficiency. T. Aasmundstad, E. Grindflek & O. Vangen

PSS is an abbreviation for?

PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF LONGEVITY IN LORI-BAKHTIARI SHEEP**

Genetic analysis of swine production traits

FINAL REPORT OF RABBIT PROJECTS

Preweaning litter growth and weaning characteristics among inbred and cross bred native by exotic piglet genotypes

4-H PORK PRODUCTION MANUAL

A National System for Recording Conformation Traits

Variation in Piglet Weights: Development of Within-Litter Variation Over a 5-Week Lactation and Effect of Farrowing Crate Design

Robust breeds for organic pig production. Tove Serup National specialist

Daryl L. Kuhlers 3, Steve B. Jungst 3 and J. A. Little 4. Auburn University 3, AL ABSTRACT

Veterinary Science. Swine Unit Handouts

UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES & AGRIBUSINESS DISCIPLINE OF ANIMAL AND POULTRY SCIENCE EXAMINATIONS: NOVEMBER 2010

QMS Pigs Assurance Scheme Compliance Version July Name and postcode of unit.. Name of unit(s)... QMS membership number(s).. Slap mark(s)..

Selection of Gilts Biomechanics. Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

2014 Iowa State FFA Livestock Judging Contest 8/23/2014 LIVESTOCK EVALUATION TEST

Correlated response in litter traits to selection for intramuscular fat in Duroc swine

Growth and Mortality of Suckling Rabbits

Sheep Breeding. Genetic improvement in a flock depends. Heritability, EBVs, EPDs and the NSIP Debra K. Aaron, Animal and Food Sciences

Crossbreeding to Improve Productivity ASI Young Entrepreneur Meeting. David R. Notter Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences Virginia Tech

PG 600. S ame time. same place. The management tool in swine reproduction

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF MEAT OF LAYING HENS IN ALTERNATIVE REARING SYSTEMS

Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation a tool for practical breeding with red breeds

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG WEIGHTS AND CALVING PERFORMANCE OF HEIFERS IN A HERD OF UNSELECTED CATTLE

Exploring the Swine Industry

Introduction to Animal Science

THE EFFECT OF THE AGE АT CONCEIVING ON THE PRODUCTIVITY TRAITS AT DAIRY EWES IN BULGARIA

Analysis of genetic improvement objectives for sheep in Cyprus

EC Crossbreeding Systems for Commercial Pork Production

1 of 9 7/1/10 2:08 PM

EVALUATION OF PUREBREDS AND TWO- BREED CROSSES IN SWINE: REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE

COURSE SYLLABUS. Course name: Animal Breeding and Production (3 rd semester) Academic year

DOI: /AVB H UDK :579.84:

A New Index for Mastitis Resistance

GENETIC TYPE AND GROWTH INFLUENCE ON THE PRODUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF LIGHT LINE HEN HYBRIDS**

4-H Swine Proficiency Program A Member s Guide

4-H Swine Proficiency

Development of a Breeding Value for Mastitis Based on SCS-Results

EFFECTS OF POSTNATAL LITTER SIZE ON REPRODUCTION OF FEMALE MICE 1

UNDESIRABLE DESIRABLE UNDESIRABLE. Round, bunchy muscle Long, smooth, muscle Light, thin muscle

Ram Buyers Guide.

International sheep session Focus on Iceland Eyþór Einarsson 1, Eyjólfur I. Bjarnason 1 & Emma Eyþórsdóttir 2 1

Crossbreeding for the Commercial Beef Producer

Overview of some of the latest development and new achievement of rabbit science research in the E.U.

Chapter 1 Introduction

EAAP 2011 Stavanger, Norway Session 52: Causes and consequences of mortality and premature culling of breeding animals

COURSE SYLLABUS. Academic year

INFLUENCE OF COAT COLOUR, SEASON AND PHYSIOLOGICAL STATUS ON REPRODUCTION OF RABBIT DOES OF AN ALGERIAN LOCAL POPULATION.

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF. for the. presented. Title: SOME GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AFFECTING PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS MEASUREMENTS

Pig Handling & Behaviour Lecture 2 ANS101/Vet

Factors Affecting Calving Difficulty and the Influence of Pelvic Measurements on Calving Difficulty in Percentage Limousin Heifers

Physical Characteristics of Animals. Intact Males More muscle Larger in stature Grow faster than females Extra muscle in the neck area

How to accelerate genetic gain in sheep?

Genetics of temperament: What do we know about the back test?

STRATEGY FOR DEVELOPING RABBIT MEAT PRODUCTION IN ALGERIA : CREATION AND SELECTION OF A SYNTHETIC STRAIN

Fun Facts About Pork!

Selection for Egg Mass in the Domestic Fowl. 1. Response to Selection

The change in the New Zealand flock and its performance

De Tolakker Organic dairy farm at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Utrecht, The Netherlands

Steven M. Jones Associate Professor L:ivestock

Web Site / Site Internet :

ESTIMATION OF PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC TRENDS OF THE GROWTH TRAITS IN LIPSKA AND SVRLJIG SHEEP

Key words : rabbit synthetic line local population reproduction - adaptation hot climate. Introduction

Body weight, feed coefficient and carcass characteristics of two strain quails and their reciprocal crosses

7. Flock book and computer registration and selection

Proven. Progressive. Purebreds.

Tail biting What we do and do not know from a genetics perspective. N. Duijvesteijn and E.F. Knol

HOW CAN TRACEABILITY SYSTEMS INFLUENCE MODERN ANIMAL BREEDING AND FARM MANAGEMENT?

MANAGING REPRODUCTION - CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS IN EXCEEDING 30 PIGS PER SOW PER YEAR

NSIP EBV Notebook June 20, 2011 Number 2 David Notter Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences Virginia Tech

Individual and maternal heterosis estimated from single crosses and backcrosses of swine

Selection for increased number of piglets at d 5 after farrowing has increased litter size and reduced piglet mortality 1

Health traits and their role for sustainability improvement of dairy production

Crusader Meat Rabbit Project Which Breed and How to Use Different Breeds SJ Eady and KC Prayaga

Genetic improvement For Alternative Hen-Housing

Genetic approaches to improving lamb survival under extensive field conditions

LANLP3 SQA Unit Code H5AX 04 Establish and confirm pregnancy in livestock

A note on the Bulgarian Danube White pig reproduction, fattening and slaughter indicators

University of Wyoming, Laramie

Registration system in Scandinavian countries - Focus on health and fertility traits. Red Holstein Chairman Karoline Holst

OVULATION RATE AND LITTER SIZE OF BARBADOS, TARGHEE AND CROSSBRED EWES'

Colorado Agriscience Curriculum

Selection for prolificacy: New prospects for an ever-interesting objective

Experiences with NSIP in the Virginia Tech Flocks Scott P. Greiner, Ph.D. Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

New French genetic evaluations of fertility and productive life of beef cows

Sow and Litter Performance of Pure Bred and Cross Bred Pigs in Sri Lanka,

THE INDIVIDUALITY OF SOWS IN REGARD TO SIZE OF LITTERS

MANY PEOPLE feel that

CHARACTERIZATION OF GENETIC RESOURCE IN CHICKEN OF ORAVKA BREED

Transcription:

Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 28 (3), p 455-462, 2012 ISSN 1450-9156 Publisher: Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun UDC 636.082 4 DOI: 10.2298/BAH1203455V HERITABILITY AND REPEATABILITY ESTIMATES OF REPRODUCTION TRAITS IN PUREBRED PIGS V. Vidovic 1, D. Lukac 1, M. Stupar 1, V. Višnjic 2, J. Krnjaic 3 1 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 8, 21 000 Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia 2 SIZIM DOO, Veliki Otok bb, 48 317 Legrad, Croatia 3 Delta Agrar, Napredak AD, Golubinacki put bb, 22300 Stara Pazova, Republic of Serbia Corresponding author: vidovic.vitomir@gmail.com Original scientific paper Abstract: Research was performed on four farms, on 2434 highly fertile females Landrace and Yorkshire, and 28 boars of Danish origin, or 7684 consecutive parities, in period 2009-2012. Study of genetic parameters of conventional breeds Landrace and Yorkshire were conducted on 3964 females who mated with 49 males or 15764 litters in the same period. Estimates of genetic parameters for litter size show the same tendency as the legality of the purebred sows that produce 11-14 weaned piglets less per sow per year. Environmental factors, HYS, food technology and management expressed no significant effect on traits. Heritability and repeatability of live and still born piglets, litter size and the live at day 5 after birth and the number of piglets weaned in category of low hereditary traits whose values vary within the limits of 0.07 to 0.12 for the heritability and from 0.15 to 0.19 for the repeatability. There was tendency of lower values of genetic parameters in the conventional compared to highly fertile sows, which is considered to be the effect of selection on gene frequency for the observed traits. Key words: genetic parameters, reproduction traits, pigs Introduction The genetic parameters are used by producers and breeders, primarily to study the natural action of genes, namely additive ones. Also that can be used for modelling of selection criteria, and selection direction of breeding. The nucleus of the farms is genetically superior material, completely healthy and used to produce desirable effects in the selection of pure breed and hybrid animals of both sexes. The current strategy of selection and crossbreeding showed significant improvement when talking about litter size at birth and weaning. This is obtained by selecting Landrace and Yorkshire pigs, particularly those originating from Denmark, which produce 11-14 more weaned piglets per sow per year over the

456 V. Vidovic et al. existing selection. The selection in our conditions showed almost identical pattern. A similar trend was also observed in hybrid sows. We analysed the value of population genetic parameters in sows that were highly fertile sows and the same breed, national - conventional selection, which produce significantly less piglets per unit of time. The purpose of study is to estimate and compare values of genetic parameters for traits like: litter size and weight at birth and weaning in female with such a high level of fertility compared to the conventional local selection of the same breed. Materials and methods Research was performed on 2434 female Landrace and Yorkshire animals, and 28 boars of Danish origin, born locally, or 7684 consecutive parities, in the period 2009-2012. Study of the genetic parameters of conventional Landrace and Yorkshire breeds were conducted on 3964 females who mated with 49 boars and produced 15764 litters in the same period. Mixed model equations (MME) was used to analyse available data, the model 1. Y ijkl = µ + K i + GS ij + P ijk * E ijkl Y ijkl the observed traits; µ - general mean value; K i random sire effect; GS ij fixed effect of differences between farms, years and seasons; P ijk effect of farrowing (parity); E ijkl random error. Analysed traits are: age of sows at first farrowing, number of live and still born pigs, live born piglets five days after birth, litter size and weight at weaning. Duration of lactation was 28 days. Diet of lactating sows was ad libitum and determined within the efficient technology, according to stage of lactation and production. Technology diet was the same at all stages of production. Results and Discussion The results are shown in Tables 1-9. Age of sows at first farrowing was 366 in Landrace and 372 days in Yorkshire breed. Sows conventional Landrace and Yorkshire were younger 32 and 42 days compared to highly fertile animals. Indirectly, conventional sows were lighter before the insemination and farrowing for 29-32 kg body weight (Table 1).

Heritability and repeatability... 457 Table 1. Age at 1 st farrowing, body weight at insemination and farrowing of prolificacy and conventional selection of Landrace and Yorkshire Traits Prolificacy Conventional Landrace Yorkshire Landrace Yorkshire Age at 1 st farrowing 366 372 334 330 Weight at insemination 138 142 109 110 Weight at farrowing 188 195 156 163 Litter size at farrowing and weaning did not differ significantly in some farrowings between the two breeds, but within the breed with the expected trend, and therefore have identical criteria for selection. There were no differences in weight or the number of piglets at weaning. Number of piglets five days after birth was less than the number of live born to 0.7. These differences are small pigs, which are the result of high selection pressure by increasing the genotype of this traits, i.e., more piglets at farrowing, and the possibility of optimal nutrition in piglets to be uniform on born. Also, this is partly a consequence of the lack of milk for such a large number of piglets born. These two traits are important and open questions for future work of breeders and nutritionists (Table 2 and 3). Almost the same is the case in conventional breeds. However, the highly fertile breed, in average, has higher values of genetic parameters for all analysed properties which is considered the contribution of selection. Table 2. Litter size of prolificacy and conventional selection of Landrace Farrowing Prolificacy Conventional Alive born Still born Weaned Alive born Still born Weaned 1. 13.8 2.3 13.1 10.8 0.9 9.3 2. 14.3 2.4 13.6 11.3 1.3 10.6 3. 15.0 2.8 13.8 11.6 1.3 10.8 4. 14.4 2.7 13.6 11.9 1.7 11.0 5. 14.1 2.6 13.4 12.1 1.9 11.1 1+2+3+4+5 14.4 2.5 13.6 11.4 1.6 10.9 Table 3. Litter size of prolificacy and conventional selection of Yorkshire Farrowing Prolificacy Conventional Alive born Still born Weaned Alive born Still born Weaned 1. 13.6 2.4 12.9 10.0 0.9 9.0 2. 14.3 2.4 13.7 10.2 1.3 10.0 3. 14.9 2.6 13.9 11.1 1.6 10.3 4. 14.0 2.3 13.5 11.3 1.8 10.6 5. 14.8 2.8 13.8 11.1 2.4 10.4 1+2+3+4+5 14.5 2.5 13.5 10.6 1.9 10.2

458 V. Vidovic et al. All the factors (sire, FYS and farrowing) have a significant influence on observed traits. Similar results have been reported by (Vidovic et al., 2011a; Vincek 2005; Radojkovic et al., 2005: Vidovic, 1976). This indicator shows that despite the modern conditions of keeping pigs in a farm where automatic control of production parameters such as light, humidity and temperature, are not balanced with females genome, which means that research is needed to improve the environment. Farrowing had a significant impact on the observed traits of both conventional as and highly fertile sows meaning that further studies are needed to stabilize the genome of these breeds. Table 4. The heritability of litter size of prolificacy Landrace 1. 0.15 0.12 0.05 0.10 0.11 2. - 0.11 0.02 0.09 0.10 3. - 0.09 0.05 0.08 0.10 4. - 0.09 0.03 0.08 0.09 5. - 0.09 0.04 0.10 0.08 1+2+3+4+5-0.10 0.03 0.09 0.10 Heritability and repeatability were not significantly different compared to conventional selection of breeds which have much lower genetic potential (Vidovic et al., 2011b; Vidovic et al., 2011c; Tretinjak et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2003; Lucia et al., 2002; Crump et al., 1997; Gordon 1997; Hue et al., 1993, Petrovic et al.,1991). This justifies the use of new knowledge in the area optimization of environment, optimization technology feeding sows and age with weight the introducing of the reproduction. Table 5. The heritability of litter size at conventional selection of Landrace Born 1. 0.12 0.10 0.05 0.11 0.10 2. - 0.09 0.02 0.09 0.10 3. - 0.09 0.02 0.09 0.09 4. - 0.08 0.04 0.11 0.11 5. - 0.07 0.05 0.10 0.11 1+2+3+4+5-0.10 0.04 0.11 0.11

Heritability and repeatability... 459 Table 6. The heritability of litter size of prolificacy Yorkshire Born 1. 0.21 0.12 0.03 0.07 0.10 2. - 0.09 0.02 0.08 0.10 3. - 0.10 0.04 0.09 0.12 4. - 0.09 0.03 0.09 0.08 5. - 0.09 0.02 0.07 0.11 1+2+3+4+5-0.11 0.03 0.08 0.11 Table 7. The heritability of litter size of conventional selection of Yorkshire Born farrowing A Live born Still born 5 th day Weaned 1. 0.14 0.12 0.04 0.10 0.10 2. - 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.08 3. - 0.09 0.02 0.09 0.09 4. - 0.09 0.03 0.07 0.07 5. - 0.11 0.03 0.07 0.09 1+2+3+4+5-0.10 0.03 0.08 0.09 Table 8. The repeatability of litter size of prolificacy Landrace 1. 0.20 0.16 0.09 0.17 0.18 2. - 0.16 0.08 0.15 0.18 3. - 0.18 0.09 0.16 0.17 4. - 0.18 0.07 0.18 0.17 5. - 0.18 0.08 0.17 0.16 1+2+3+4+5-0.17 0.09 0.17 0.17 Table 9. The repeatability of litter size of conventional selection of Landrace Born 1. 0.19 0.18 0.07 0.16 0.16 2. - 0.16 0.08 0.16 0.15 3. - 0.17 0.08 0.17 0.16 4. - 0.17 0.07 0.15 0.18 5. - 0.18 0.07 0.15 0.20 1+2+3+4+5-0.18 0.07 0.16 0.19

460 V. Vidovic et al. Conclusion There are statistically significant differences for number of alive, still born and weaned piglets between prolificacy and conventional Landrace and Yorkshire breeds. No differences within prolificacy are for the same traits. Prolificacy s L and Y gilts were heavier at the entrance to the production, which guarantees the continuity of a stable production of pigs and optimal replacement. Conventional selection of the same L and Y breeds were, by selection criteria and technology, at least one month younger and with smaller size. These indicate shorter life production and smaller litter size. Genetic parameters indicate that reproduction belong to low hereditary traits regardless of the level of genetic potential and significantly larger litters than the conventional selection of these breeds in our conditions. Even statistically significant differences on phenotypic level, the estimation of genetic parameters for both indicated they are belonging to low heritage group of traits. Knowing that ovulation rate belong to middle heritage trait (h 2 0.40) it is necessarily to use different management in feeding regime of females and age with weight of gilts. Research justifies the use of new information technologies in the area of feeding sows, and optimization of production conditions, e.g. humidity, air velocity, temperature and light, which significantly affect the development of the genome. A particularly important aspect is the adaptation of modern management aspects in production management at the farm. As expected evaluations the repeatability values were significantly higher than heritability. The differences between genetic parameters of prolificacy and conventional purebred L and Y belong to selection efficiency during generation. Heritabilnost i ponovljivost reprodukcijskih svojstava svinja čistih rasa V. Vidović, D. Lukač, M. Stupar, V. Višnjić, J. Krnjaić Rezime Istraživanja su izvedena na 4 farme na kojima su krmače podeljene u dve grupe: visokoplodne i konvencionalne sa znatno nižom plodnošću. Broj visokoplodnih iznosio je 2.434 krmača rase landras i jorkšir koje su parene sa 28 nerastova,svi Danskog porekla ili, 7.684 legla iz prvih 5 prašenja a u periodu 2009. 2012. Uporedo su izvedena i istraživanja na plotkinjama koje su odabirane koristeći konvencionalne selekcsijske kriterijume, rasa landras i jorkšir, koja su obuhvatila 3.964 krmače parene sa 49 nerastova, i koje su proizvele 15.764 legla u istom periodu. Na obe selekcije, visokoplodne i konvencionalne, primenjeni su

Heritability and repeatability... 461 različiti kriterijumi selekcije (danski i srpski) tokom godina proizvodnje sa očekivanim efektima. Za korekciju uticaja sistematskih i slučajnih faktora korišćen je mešoviti model ocene. Razlika u broju zalučene prasadi između visokoplodnih i konvencionalnih selekcija bila je signifikantna, a varirala je u granicama 11-14 zalučene prasadi na godišnjem nivou. Ocene heritabilnosti varirale su u granicama 0.07 0.12 dok su vrednosti koefcijent ponovljivosi bile veće i to za nivo dodatnih informacija iz modela. Varirale su u granicama 15 19 procenata. Selekcijski kriterijumi u konvencionalnih selekcija nisu bili efikasni prema očekivanju. Bili su pristrasni. Visokoplodne životinje pokazale su genetsku superiornost ali je udeo aditivnih gena bio gotovo identičan kao u konvencionalni selekcija obe rase. Reference CHEN P., BASS T. J.,MABRY J. W., KOEHLER K. J., DEKKERS C. M. (2003): Genetic Parameters and Trends for Litter in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace Pigs. J. Anim Sci., 81, 46-53. CRUMP R. E., HALEY C. S., THOMSON R., MERCER J. (1997): Individual Animal Model Estimates of Genetic Parameters for Reproduction Traits of Landrace Pigs Performance Tested in a Commercial Nucleus Herd. J. Animal Sci., 65, 285-290. GORDON I. (1997): Controlled Reproduction in Pigs. Oxon, CAB International, pp. 247. HUE L. L., DIAL G. D., MARSH W. E., DAVIES P. R., MOMONT H. W. (1993):Influence of Lactation Length on Sow Productivity. Livest. Prod. Sci.,34, 253-265. LUCIA T. J., CORREA N. M., DESCHAMPS C. J., BIANCHI I., DONIN A. M., MACHADO C. A., MEINCKE W., MATHEUS E. M. J. (2002): Risk Factors for Stillbirths in Two Swine Farms in the South of Brazil. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 53, 285-292. PETROVIC M., LATINOVIC D., STOJIC P., KOSOVAC O. (1991): Uticaj genetskih i faktora okoline na varijabilnost rezultata performans testa nazimica. Biotehnologija u stočarstvu, 7, (1-2): 25-32. RADOJKOVIC D., PETROVIC M., MIJATOVIC M., RADOVIC I. (2005): Phenotypic and Genetic Correlation of Fertility Traits of Swedish Landrace. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 21 (3-4): 79-88. TRETINJAK M., SKORPUT D., DJIKIC M., LUKOVIC L. (2009): Veličina legla u krmača na obiteljskim gospodarstvima u republici Hrvatskoj. Stočarstvo, 63, 175-185. VIDOVIC V., VIŠNJIC V., JUGOVIC D., PUNOS D., VUKOVIC N. (2011a): Praktično svinjarstvo. APROSIM. Novi Sad, pp. 287. VIDOVIC V., LUKAC D. (2010): Genetika životinja, Poljoprivredni fakultet Novi Sad, pp 361.

462 V. Vidovic et al. VIDOVIC V. (1997): Poređenje ocene genetskih parametara za reprodukcijske osobine svinja gajenih u čistoj rasi i ukrštanju. Doktorska disetacija, Biotehnički fakultet, Ljubljana. VIDOVIC V., LUKAC D., STRBAC LJ., STUPAR M. (2011b): Effect of age and weight of Yorkshire gilts at mating on litter size and longevity. Stočarstvo, 65, 3-12. VIDOVIC V., STRBAC LJ., LUKAC D., STUPAR M. (2011c): Influence of age and weight of Landrace gilts at fertile insemination on litter size and longevity. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 27, 75-85. VINCEK D.(2005): Veličina legla majčinskih linija uzgojnog programa u svinjogojstvu. Stočarstvo, 59, 13-21. Received 16 may 2012; accepted for publication 15 August 2012