EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR A PRESENCE/ ABSENCE SURVEY FOR THE DESERT TORTOISE (Gopherus agassizii),

Similar documents
RECOMMENDED STANDARD MITIGATION MEASURES FOR PROJECTS IN SONORAN DESERT TORTOISE HABITAT

Appendix D-18. Desert Tortoise Survey 2011

Big Chino Valley Pumped Storage Project (FERC No ) Desert Tortoise Study Plan

May Dear Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Surveyor,

American Rescue Dog Association. Standards and Certification Procedures

Desert Tortoise Surveys on the Precision Impact Range Area October 2006, Edwards Air Force Base, California

APPENDIX F. General Survey Methods for Covered Species

OPINIONS BY MARK C. JORGENSEN MAY 2, 2012

STATUS OF THE DESERT TORTOISE AND CRITICAL HABITAT. Status of the Desert Tortoise

Protocol for Responding to Cold-Stunning Events

A REPTILE SURVEY AT THE LAND AT HILL ROAD AND ELM TREE DRIVE, ROCHESTER, KENT,

In 1990, Caltrans erected tortoise-proof fencing and culverts along Hwy 5& on a portion that was schedulgd t be widened from two lanes to a four-lane,

DESERT TORTOISE SIGN RECOGNITION INITIAL REQUIREMENTS DESERT TORTOISE SIGN RECOGNITION. Find Sign in the Open INITIAL REQUIREMENTS.

CHAPTER 14: MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF LISTED SPECIES

FALL 2015 BLACK-FOOTED FERRET SURVEY LOGAN COUNTY, KANSAS DAN MULHERN; U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

REFERENCE - CALIFORNIA LAW: Pet Boarding Facilities, effective January 1, 2017 (2016 SB 945, Senator William Monning)

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 2007 DEVELOPMENT CODE

1.0 SUMMARY OF THE ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE ENVIRONMENT: PROJECT OBJECTIVES, SOLUTIONS AND ACHIEVEMENTS

Greenham Common, Crookham Common and Bowdown Wood Reptile Survey 2010

TITLE XVII HUNTLEY CEMETERY GUIDELINES. Updated and Approved Ordinance (O)

Distribution, population dynamics, and habitat analyses of Collared Lizards

LAND AT REAR OF PARAPET HOUSE LENHAM KENT REPTILE SCOPING SURVEY

K E N N E L L I C E N S E A P P L I C A T I O N

2014 BOBCAT MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES

Water vole survey on Laughton Level via Mill Farm

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

LEON COUNTY Reference: Reference: COMPREHENSIVE STATE NATIONAL EMERGENCY CEMP RESPONSE PLAN MANAGEMENT PLAN ESF 17 ANNEX 17 ANIMAL ISSUES

PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF ROADS AND ASSOCIATED VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ON SNAKE POPULATIONS IN EASTERN TEXAS

Raptor Ecology in the Thunder Basin of Northeast Wyoming

University of Nevada, Las Vegas Policy on Laboratory Animal Care and Use

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE BROOD-REARING HABITAT MANIPULATION IN MOUNTAIN BIG SAGEBRUSH, USE OF TREATMENTS, AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY ON PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH

General Prevention Practices for Beef and dairy Producers

Alberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report

318.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

Gambel s Quail Callipepla gambelii

27% 79K CAYUGA COUNTY, NY: PROFILE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS

A MODEL TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE: RAISING AND KEEPING OF CHICKENS 1

HAT HILL DOG OFF-LEASH AREA MODIFICATIONS

Versatile Coir Wattles Offer Cost-Effective Sediment Control at Construction Sites

Teynham, Sittingbourne,, Kent. Reptile Survey. 02 nd October 2015 / Ref No 2015/07/13 Client: Hobbs Parker Property Consultants LLP

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Dall s Sheep Distribution and Abundance Study Plan Section Initial Study Report

THE LAWNS CEMETERY 1 FILEY TOWN COUNCIL

Desplaines Valley. Mosquito Abatement District. Prepared by the Desplaines Valley Mosquito Abatement District PROVISO LYONS OAK PARK RIVERSIDE

Human Impact on Sea Turtle Nesting Patterns

More panthers, more roadkills Florida panthers once ranged throughout the entire southeastern United States, from South Carolina

Mission Partnering for over Twenty Years: Flat-tailed Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii) Management. Robert E. Lovich & Michel Remington

Southborough Town Council. Burial Ground Regulations

Signature: Signed by ES Date Signed: 06/02/2017

GAO Earned Value Management (EVM) Audit Findings

Municipal Animal Control in New Jersey, Best Practices March 2018

Franklin County Animal Protection Plan Draft

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

HAMILTON COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ANNEX K - EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION #11 AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS

Gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) are a keystone species in Florida scrub habitats.

Home Range, Habitat Use, Feeding Ecology and Reproductive Biology of the Cuban Boa (Chilabothrus angulifer) at Naval Station Guantánamo Bay, Cuba

High Risk Behavior for Wild Sheep: Contact with Domestic Sheep and Goats

Rethinking RTOs: Identifying and Removing Barriers to Owner Reclaim, Part Two

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Secretariat provided by the United Nations Environment Programme

PET RULES. The Berkeley Housing Authority (BHA) prohibits the keeping of pets by tenants with the following exceptions:

BBBEVENTEENTH ANNUAL INTRODUCTION TO SURVEYING, MONITORING AND HANDLING TECHNIQUES WORKSHOP

Investigations of Giant Garter Snakes in The Natomas Basin: 2002 Field Season

Snowy Plover Management Plan Updated 2015

Steps Towards a Blanding s Turtle Recovery Plan in Illinois: status assessment and management

Rules and Regulations Oakridge Cemetery Marshall, Michigan

Policy Number: L Approved Date: March 6, 2017 Review Date: March 6, Leeward Community College Animals on Campus Policy

Mt Porter. Standard Operating Procedure Flora and Fauna Identification. July 2016 Ark Mines Limited

Snapping Turtle Monitoring Program Guide

GENERAL PREVENTION PRACTICES CHECKLIST FOR SHEEP AND GOAT PRODUCERS

POLICY. Number: Animals on Campus Responsible Office: Administrative Services I. PURPOSE & INTENT

Western Painted Turtle Monitoring and Habitat Restoration at Buttertubs Marsh, Nanaimo, BC

Page 1 of 5. Town of Ashburnham CEMETERY RULES REGULATIONS. Effective January 1,2007 Main Street, Ashburnham, MA 01430

DOG CONTROL POLICY 2016

2017 Great Bay Terrapin Project Report - Permit # SC

Highway Mortality in Desert Tortoises and Small Vertebrates: Success of Barrier Fences and Culverts

Functional Exercise: Foot and Mouth Disease at the County Fair. Local Preparedness and Response for Animal Disease Emergencies

TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE BLACK-LEGGED TICK, IXODES SCAPULARIS, IN TEXAS AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH CLIMATE VARIATION

Grant ID: 220. Application Information. Demographics.

Our Neighbors the Coyotes. Presented by: First Landing State Park

CLARE CEMETERY REGULATIONS. Burial Authority Aims

Dr Kathy Slater, Operation Wallacea

Rapid City, South Dakota Waterfowl Management Plan March 25, 2009

Managing Uplands with Keystone Species. The Case of the Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus)

Lee County Procurement Management 1500 Monroe 4th Floor Fort Myers, FL (239)

Appendix 6.4. Reptile Survey

OIE Standards on biosecurity and compartmentalisation

VIRIDOR WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITED. Parkwood Springs Landfill, Sheffield. Reptile Survey Report

Report to the Raleigh Parks, Recreation and Greenway Advisory Board: Off-leash Dog Areas. Background

Winooski Municipal Code Chapter 16. Parks and Recreation. Parks and Recreation

ROAMING DOG POPULATION COUNTING PROTOCOL

APPENDIX C. Burleigh County Housing Authority (BCHA) Dwelling Lease Addendum Pet Policy and Policy for Assistance Animals (Auxiliary Aides)

Chapter 14 Pet Policy

Bolson Tortoise Gopherus flavomarginatus Fact Sheet

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ARISING FROM THE RESCUE OF ANIMALS AFFECTED BY A NATURAL DISASTER

AUGUST 2016 Ashford Park Quarry Pest Plant and Animal Control Plan

Mexican Gray Wolf Reintroduction

WHO (HQ/MZCP) Intercountry EXPERT WORKSHOP ON DOG AND WILDLIFE RABIES CONTROL IN JORDAN AND THE MIDDLE EAST. 23/25 June, 2008, Amman, Jordan

UNIVERSITY POLICY ON THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH AND TEACHING.

Service and Assistance Animal Policy

Section I. Definitions

Mexican Gray Wolf Endangered Population Modeling in the Blue Range Wolf Recovery Area

Transcription:

C.5 Desert Tortoise

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR A PRESENCE/ ABSENCE SURVEY FOR THE DESERT TORTOISE (Gopherus agassizii), on the proposed Alta Oak Creek Mojave Wind Generation Project near Mojave, Kern County, California June 2009 Prepared for: CH2MHill, Inc. West Region, Environmental Services 2485 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 600 Sacramento, California 95833 Prepared by: Sundance Biology, Inc. 179 Niblick Rd. PMB 272 Paso Robles, CA 93446

ALTA OAK CREEK MOJAVE PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Desert Tortoise Survey Summary and Mitigation Recommendations As recommended in the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Survey Protocol for any Non Federal Action that may Occur within the Range of the Desert Tortoise, (January 1992), a desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) presence or absence survey was conducted at the proposed Alta Oak Creek Mojave Project site 3 miles west of SR 14 and 3 miles south of SR 58, near the Oak Creek area of eastern Kern County, California. The approximately 9,200 acre site was assessed for suitable desert tortoise habitat. All potentially suitable habitat on the site was surveyed for presence of desert tortoise, totaling 8,436 acres. The site consists of three named sub areas, CPC East, CPC Proper, and Ward. After surveying, it was deemed that suitable tortoise habitat occurs only within the CPC East sub area and the southeastern portion of the CPC Proper sub area. Thirty foot wide belt transects were conducted between April 15 and May 27, 2009, using preprogrammed transects loaded onto Lowrance i Finder handheld GPS units. No zone of influence transects were conducted because access off site was not available, however surveys were conducted by SBI on adjacent proposed project sites, however this information is currently not public (Vaughn, 2009). Two individual tortoises were found on the site, and some desert tortoise sign was found scattered throughout the site as well as off the site during surveys for adjacent proposed projects (Figure 1, Table 1). The site lies at the far western edge of the geographic range for the desert tortoise. During the spring 2009 survey the understory vegetation was very dense as a result of significant winter precipitation, making locating tortoise sign difficult. However, if the site were inhabited by a large number of tortoises more sign would have been present. Based on the two individual tortoises found and the nominal amount of sign, it is probable that the proposed project site is supporting a very low density population which may or may not be viable. This assumption is based on the finding of a possible juvenile burrow and fresh scat from an immature sized tortoise, evidence that reproduction and recruitment has taken place in recent years. The dominant vegetation community within the suitable tortoise habitat areas of the site is creosote bush bursage desert scrub with areas of Joshua tree woodland. This habitat is present at CPC East (6,465 acres) and the far southeastern portion of CPC Proper, (538 acres) (Figure 1). Human impacts on the site include widespread, heavy sheep grazing, off highway vehicle (OHV) use, shooting, and trash dumping. The habitat is of poor to moderate quality for desert tortoises as a result of these impacts, with the most devastating being sheep grazing. DESERT TORTOISE MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS While it is typical to seek off site mitigation lands for projects impacting desert tortoise habitat, it is recommended that the Agencies strongly consider on site mitigation for the Alta Oak Creek Mojave Project. Desert tortoises remaining west of SR 14 and south of SR 58 are essentially isolated by both highways as well as railroad tracks to the east and unsuitable habitat to the west and south (south of Rosamond Blvd). The quality of the habitat on site is already challenged by the above noted human

impacts as well as invasive plant species, which is exacerbated by grazing. Even with all the odds against them, a few tortoises are still managing to survive and reproduce. The site may be an ideal area to consider headstarting with juvenile tortoises in an attempt to recover these extreme western populations. The limited surface impacts of constructing wind generation facilities may allow for the coexistence of desert tortoises and wind turbines. However these impacts combined with the current land uses (sheep grazing and OHV use) will most certainly and significantly reduce any chance for these very low density populations to recover, unless a properly executed mitigation plan is executed. The concept of mitigation lands being purchased off site and conserved in perpetuity is appropriate when dealing with significant reduction in high quality habitat inhabited by stable populations. Additionally, the ownership of mitigation lands does not guarantee that conservation efforts are being undertaken nor that recovery of the species is occurring. The Alta Oak Creek Mojave site and other similar sites are unique in their needs for conservation. Within the far western edge of the species geographic range, isolated by anthropogenic features, and with very low population densities, the greatest opportunity for recovery these tortoise populations may have is to minimize the threats they currently face while still allowing the proposed project to move forward. Because of the very low densities of desert tortoise on the site and the proposed disturbance of between 6 10 % of the surface area for construction of the project it is of low likelihood that a tortoise will be seen within a construction area. Based on this it is not recommended that a Take Permit for desert tortoise be acquired at this time. In the event a desert tortoise is encountered during construction and on a construction area, the project proponent will immediately contact the USFWS and CDFG for further consultation. Though desert tortoise densities are very low the proposed project may result in both direct and indirect impact to the desert tortoises in the area. In order to minimize indirect impacts through loss of habitat the following measures are recommended. Mitigation Recommendations for Habitat Enhancement: a. Terminate existing grazing leases. b. Fence an agreed upon acreage of suitable desert tortoise habitat to keep out sheep and OHV activity for the life of the project and constructing the fence to allow tortoises to move freely to maintain genetic exchange. With such a measure the wind farm may, in fact, be beneficial for the conservation of the tortoise as well as other desert wildlife species. c. Revegetation of denuded areas and areas temporarily used during construction to improve habitat for desert tortoises. d. Use existing roads whenever possible in order to minimize new surface disturbance.

In order to mitigate potential direct impacts, the following measures will help minimize the potential for take of tortoises during and after construction. Develop a biological monitoring plan in consultation with the USFWS and the CDFG. This plan would describe all measures to be implemented prior to, during and post construction, which would include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. All land survey crews on site prior to construction be escorted by a qualified desert tortoise biologist (approved by USFWS and CDFG). Land survey crews frequently travel cross country in vehicles prior to construction and a qualified tortoise monitor should clear the path immediately in front of the survey crew. b. All vehicular traffic with limited visibility related to the project during construction, be it on existing roads or cross country be escorted by a qualified biologist unless temporary tortoise proof fencing is erected in these areas. c. Site access should be limited to designated access roads so as to avoid take on unmonitored roads. d. Project speed limit not to exceed 15 MPH during construction and operations. e. Temporary tortoise proof fencing (1 x 2 mesh hardware cloth) may need to be erected and maintained between the interface of the project construction areas and any remaining desert tortoise habitat prior to initiating construction and clearance surveys for desert tortoises on site. The fence will prevent tortoises from wandering onto the wind turbine sites. Ongoing maintenance of the fencing would be recommended with oversight by an authorized biologist. Fence installation should be monitored by a qualified tortoise biologist. f. Tortoise clearance surveys should be conducted at 15 foot intervals. It is recommended that two desert tortoise surveys without finding any tortoises or new tortoise sign be conducted prior to declaring the fenced construction sites free of tortoises. All burrows that could provide shelter for a desert tortoise should be excavated during the first clearance survey. If a tortoise is encountered while conducting a clearance survey or during burrow excavation the tortoise will not be handled but will be monitored from a distance to ensure its safety. The temporary tortoise proof fencing will be removed, and no further construction will occur in the area until the tortoise has moved on its own out of the area. g. All construction personnel should undergo desert tortoise awareness training. h. After the tortoise proof fence is erected a qualified biologist(s) should remain onsite until all vegetation is cleared and, at a minimum, conduct site and fence inspections on a bi weekly basis throughout construction in order to maintain compliance with mitigation measures. i. A qualified biologist(s) should be onsite to survey for tortoises immediately in front of vegetation clearance activities in the event a tortoise was inadvertently missed during clearance surveys.

j. A biologist should remain on call throughout construction in the event a tortoise wanders onto a construction site. k. A raven management plan should be developed for the project site. l. Maintain an environmental awareness training program for all maintenance employees. m. Provide post construction reports to USFWS and CDFG within 90 days of completion of construction documenting any tortoise or tortoise sign encounters as well as measures taken. Table 1. Desert Tortoise Sign found on the Alta Oak Creek Project Sign Type Easting Northing Comments TORTOISE 380652 3875591 Found south of cement factory. Missing left side of gular. No obvious signs of disease. Was alert and active. TORTOISE 384030 3873782 Found on aqueduct road. BURROW 381060 3877253 Old non active burrow. BURROW 381128 3877396 Old burrow located in side train track berm. BURROW 381155 3875250 Old burrow. BURROW 385032 3876926 Facing east. BURROW 380658 3875654 BURROW 380183 3873343 Old burrow. SCAT 384463 3873516 This year. SCAT 384515 3873550 This year. SCAT 380658 3875603 This year. On old road. 3 pieces. SCAT 380675 3875549 This year. 1 Piece in Joshua tree debris. NOTES: 1. UTM coordinates in NAD 83 Zone 11S 2. 18 additional burrows were found on this and adjacent projects, which at one time may have been used by tortoises, but have become unsuitable due to modification from mammals, and weathering. These have not been mapped.

Figure 1. Desert Tortoise Sign mapped on the CPC East and southeastern portion of CPC Proper sub areas of the Alta Oak Creek Project site.