The genetic factors under consideration in the present study include black (+) vs. red (y), a sex-linked pair of alternatives manifesting

Similar documents
Biology 164 Laboratory

No tail (Manx) is a dominant trait and its allele is represented by M The presence of a tail is recessive and its allele is represented by m

Studying Gene Frequencies in a Population of Domestic Cats

Biology 201 (Genetics) Exam #1 120 points 22 September 2006

The Rest of the Story. Fine Points of Mendelian Genetics. Alleles don t necessarily come in two forms only! The Rest of the Story 3/9/11

Basic color/pattern genetics. Heather R Roberts 3 November 2007

The color and patterning of pigmentation in cats, dogs, mice horses and other mammals results from the interaction of several different genes

Phenotype Observed Expected (O-E) 2 (O-E) 2 /E dotted yellow solid yellow dotted blue solid blue

Was the Spotted Horse an Imaginary Creature? g.org/sciencenow/2011/11/was-the-spotted-horse-an-imagina.html

Mendelian Genetics SI

Today: Mendel s Technique: What Mendel Observes: Mendelian Genetics: Consider this. Mendelian Genetics and Problems (In-Class 6)

Incomplete Dominance and Codominance

Biology 2108 Laboratory Exercises: Variation in Natural Systems. LABORATORY 2 Evolution: Genetic Variation within Species

UNIT 6 Genes and Inheritance sciencepeek.com

B- indicates dominant phenotype

LINKAGE OF ALBINO ALLELOMORPHS IN RATS AND MICE'

Question 3 (30 points)

1 - Black 2 Gold (Light) 3 - Gold. 4 - Gold (Rich Red) 5 - Black and Tan (Light gold) 6 - Black and Tan

Genetics Lab #4: Review of Mendelian Genetics

Inheritance of the king coat colour pattern in cheetahs Acinonyx jubatus

Genetics Lab #4: Review of Mendelian Genetics

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

1. For each genotype, indicate whether it is heterozygous (HE) or homozygous (HO) Ii Jj kk Ll

PIGEONETICS LAB PART 1

Worksheet for Morgan/Carter Laboratory #9 Mendelian Genetics II: Drosophila

I the BUSSEY INSTITUTION of HARVARD UNIVERSITY, it was found that

GENETIC ANALYSIS REPORT

History of the Domestic Cat

Bi156 Lecture 1/13/12. Dog Genetics

Virtual Genetics Lab (VGL)

Genome 371; A 03 Berg/Brewer Practice Exam I; Wednesday, Oct 15, PRACTICE EXAM GENOME 371 Autumn 2003

Visit for Videos, Questions and Revision Notes.

Basic Terminology and Eyeband Colors

Different versions of a single gene are called allleles, and one can be dominant over the other(s).

Page 2. Explain what is meant by codominant alleles (1) Male cats with a tortoiseshell phenotype do not usually occur. Explain why. ...

SUNSHINE COLOUR IN SIBERIAN CATS

TRICOLOR IIVHERITANCE TORTOISESHELL CATS'

Problem 1. What is the simplest explanation for the inheritance of these colors in chickens?

Problem 1. What is the simplest explanation for the inheritance of these colors in chickens?

Practice Study Guide Genetics:

Genetics #2. Polyallelic Traits. Genetics can be very complicated.

GENETIC ANALYSIS REPORT

Problem 1. What is the simplest explanation for the inheritance of these colors in chickens?

TE 408: Three-day Lesson Plan

Sample Size Adapted from Schmidt, et al Life All Around Us.

Name Period G eni G ames Worksheet Packet 1

Genetics. What s Genetics? An organism s heredity is the set of characteristics it receives from its parents.

13. Cell division is. assortment. telophase. cytokinesis.

Blue is the New Black How genes can influence appearance.

THE EFFECTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ON CURLY EXPRESSIVITY IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGAST ER. Ken NOZAWA

Mendelian Genetics Problem Set

Inheritance of Livershunt in Irish Wolfhounds By Maura Lyons PhD

Monday, January 28, 13. Dominance and Multiple Allele Notes

PLEASE PUT YOUR NAME ON ALL PAGES, SINCE THEY WILL BE SEPARATED DURING GRADING.

Studying Mechanisms of Inheritance using Drosophila melanogaster

Genetic Notation Overview Phenotype Naming Conventions Angelfish Genetics Calculator

husband P, R, or?: _? P P R P_ (a). What is the genotype of the female in generation 2. Show the arrangement of alleles on the X- chromosomes below.

SIBERIAN SUNSHINE. The new colour which came in from the cold? Eleonora Ruggiero Silvia Perego v.2017

Genetics Intervention

Genetics Problems. Character Dominant Recessive

The purpose of this lab was to examine inheritance patters in cats through a

Pointer Coat Color Genetics

INHERITANCE OF COAT COLOR AND COAT PATTERN IN THE DOMESTIC CAT By Rosemonde S. Peltz, M.D.

Sections 2.1. and 2.2. (Single gene inheritance, The chromosomal basis of single-gene inheritance patterns)

ECONOMIC studies have shown definite

Breeding Icelandic Sheepdog article for ISIC 2012 Wilma Roem

1/27/10 More complications to Mendel

THE MASKING OF SEPIA BY WHITE, TWO RECESSIVE

Inheritance of coat and colour in the Griffon Bruxellois dog

Punnett square practice Honors KEY

6. Show the cross for one heterozygous short hair cat and a long haired cat. What percentage of the offspring will have short hair?

Cow Exercise 1 Answer Key

1 This question is about the evolution, genetics, behaviour and physiology of cats.

Two-Factor Crosses. All of the resulting F 1 offsrping had round yellow peas (RrYy).

Cardigan Welsh Corgi Coat Color Genetics. a report to the Cardigan Welsh Corgi Club of America

TOPIC 8: PUNNETT SQUARES

Genetics Extra Practice Show all work!

Complex Patterns of Inheritance. Reading Preview. Incomplete Dominance. Codominance. Essential Questions

GENETIC DRIFT Carol Beuchat PhD ( 2013)

Seed color is either. that Studies Heredity. = Any Characteristic that can be passed from parents to offspring

Coat Colour. Lakeland Terrier

AS91157 Demonstrate understanding of genetic variation and change. Punnett Squares

GENE FREQUENCIES IN ICELANDIC CATS. NEIL B. TODD Carnivore Genetics Research Center, P.O. Box 5, Newtonville, Massachusetts ROBERT M.

Genetics and Probability

Genetics & Punnett Square Notes

The Hypostatic Genotype of the Recessive White Prat Breed of Chickens

NON MENDELIAN INHERITANCE PART III

Station 1 Background Information: Punnett Square Problem: Questions:

Karyotypes Pedigrees Sex-Linked Traits Genetic Disorders

A cat that has two colours (or three in the case of torties) i.e. white and any other solid (or tortoiseshell) colour.

Chapter 11 Mendel and Punnett Squares

9-2 Probability and Punnett. Squares Probability and Punnett Squares. Slide 1 of 21. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

Students will be able to answer their genetic questions using other inheritance patterns.

GENETICS PRACTICE 1: BASIC MENDELIAN GENETICS

GENETICS 310 PRACTICE EXAM I-1 ANSWERED

W. E. CASTLE. Received, July 21, 1950

Incomplete Dominance, Co-Dominance, and Sex-linked dominance NON-MENDELIAN GENETICS

Biology 100. ALE #8. Mendelian Genetics and Inheritance Practice Problems

Independent Practice: Red throated booby bird R = red throat r = white throat. 1. Cross RR with rr. 2. Cross Rr with RR.

GCCF REGISTRATION POLICY FOR BRITISH SHORTHAIR CATS. Proposal for Revision 2012

Transcription:

GENE FREQUENCES N BOSTON'S CATS NEL B. TODD* The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 218 Received 29.Vi.6 1. NTRODUCTON THREE previous papers have appeared on gene frequencies in domestic cat populations. These present data on the cats of London (Searle, 1949), Mishima and Gotemba, Japan (Komai, 1952), and Singapore (Searle, '959). The genetic factors under consideration in the present study include black (+) vs. red (y), a sex-linked pair of alternatives manifesting lack of dominance towards one another; agouti or tabby (+ ) vs. self or non-tabby (a); striped tabby (+t) vs. blotched tabby (t6); black and/or red (+") vs. blue and/or cream dilution (d); and dominant white (W) vs. pigmented (+tv) With the exception of the black-red alternatives the other factors are autosomal with presumably i per cent. penetrance. n addition, some comments will be made on white spotting (S), polydactyly (P) and long-hair (1). A comprehensive discussion of these characters will be found in Robinson (1959). 2. SAMPLE SOURCE The present sample represents stray or unwanted animals turned over to the Animal Rescue League (ARL) and the Angell Memorial Hospital, Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (MSPCA), Boston, Massachusetts; surgical and clinical cases at the MSPCA; and experimental animals at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, Massachusetts. Two questions arose concerning the validity of considering these groups as a single population. The first was the possible selective destruction of cats at the MSPCA and the second concerned the cats of MGH which were supplied by a Rhode sland dealer some 5 miles south of Boston. The phenotypic distributions of the sex-linked alternatives black and red (table i) were used to compare these groups. No significant difference was found when all cats from ARL and MSPGA, with the exception of the morgue cats, were compared by a x2homogeneity test with the morgue cats (x2 o4; o9o>p>o75). A similar test comparing the MGH group to ARL and MSPCA also showed no significant difference (x2 = P12; o75>p>o5o). Siamese and other obviously "fancy" cats were eliminated from this sample on the assumption that they do not share a common gene pool with it by virtue of their supervised breeding. This survey was carried out between May, 1961 and January, 1962. * Present address: Animal Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 2115. 47

48 NEL B. TODD TABLEi Distribution of black, tortoiseshell and red phenotypes among the sub-groups comprising the population under consideration. See text for discussion Females +y+y +t,, jy Males + y Unsexed or Unclassified Total ARL.... MSPCA... (excluding morgue) MSPCA... (morgue) MGH.. ii 55 i8 i8 8 19 9 12 2 5 15 2 i6 5 4 9 8 5 152 49 6 Total... 48 4 99 28 i8 299. RESULTS Sex distribution: among the sexed animals there were x 6o females and 1 males. This distribution fits an expected i :x with a probability of 1-2 per cent. (x2 = 248). TABLE 2 Determination of randomness of breeding by comparison of theoretical distributions computed from gene frequencies with observed phenotype distributions ndividuals Observed Y alleles ndividuals Expected +"+" +'Y Jy+y 12 48 4 99 28 48 8 28 o29 4797 74 1248 2452 Total 281 84 Gene frequencies:y = 19 and + = o8o7; X5 1.17; N = a; 7>P>5o. Randomness of breeding in this population was determined by the method employed by Searle (i949, 1959), i.e. calculation of the gene frequency of black (+") and red (j) in the population and comparison of the theoretical distribution of black, tortoiseshell and red phenotypes with the observed phenotype frequencies. These data are summarised in table 2. The correspondence of fit is o.7o>.p>o.5o(x2 = 17; d.f. = 2). The gene frequency fory is o9. On the assumption that the population is random breeding the frequencies of the following alleles were calculated.

GENE FREQUENCES N CATS 49 Agouti (tabby) vs. self (non-tabby): Classification with respect to this character was not possible in dominant white individuals, some tortoiseshell females, and in animals with extreme white spotting. n addition red individuals were rejected because of the epistasis of red to the agouti self alternatives. The total classified was 28, of which 98 were self (aa). Therefore, the combination frequency (c.f.) is aa = 412 and the gene frequency (g.f.) is a = o'642, and + O58. These data are summarised in table. Striped vs. blotched tabby: Classification for these alternatives was not possible in many non-tabby individuals as the homozygous recessive condition at the agouti, self locus is generally epistatic to the striped or blotched pattern. However, so-called "ghost" markings were visible in some self individuals and where striped could be distinguished TABLE Phenotype frequencies and gene frequencies of agouti, tabby, blue dilution and dominant white. There are no sign/icant differences between males and females in the distributions of any pair of alternatives Allele Females Males Unsexed Total Combination Frequency Gene Frequency +a +jb +d W + 78 6i 64 15 226 28 6 254 6 5 68 i8 15 2! 7 226 2 6 14 98 15 52 2 286 588 42 84 196 o8r8 182 44 956 O58 642 557 44 o 574 426 22 O978 from blotched the animals were classified. Cats with extensive white spotting and some tortoiseshells could not be classified. n addition 6 animals had patterns not clearly classifiable as striped or blotched. A third dominant allele at this locus, Abyssinian (t'-) was not present. The total classified was therefore i68. Among these animals were blotched tabbies (tbtb). Therefore, c.f. tbll = 196, g.f. t' = 44, and + = O557 (table ). Black and/or red vs. blue and/or cream dilution: Only the dominant white cats could not be classified with respect to this character. From a total of 286 animals classified, 52 individuals were dilute (dd). Therefore, c.f. dd = o182, g.f. d = o426, and +" = o574 (table ). Dominant white vs. pigmented: All cats (299) were classified according to this character. Two individuals had a small patch of pigmented hair, greyish to black in appearance on the top of the head. This is attributed, on the basis of independent breeding evidence, to incomplete penetrance of dominant white rather than to a spotting allele. There were 286 pigmented individuals. Therefore, c.f. = O956, g.f. + = o 978, and W = O22 (table ). D

5 NEL B. TODD Dominant white spotting vs. non-spotted: No effort was made to distinguish between the degrees of spotting present. As some of the animals classified were surgical cases viewed in cages, it was not possible to examine them for distribution of spotting. The figures given here therefore, are minimum values for spotting. Dominant white individuals were not classified leaving a total of 286 of which 91 were classed as non-spotted. Therefore, c.f. ++ = O8, and g.f. = = O564, and S = o46. Short hair vs. long hair: Among 249 animals classified for hair length 25 were long haired. Therefore c.f. ii = oo91, and g.f. 2. Linkage: Linkage between two mutant alleles would not of necessity be detectable through comparison of predicted and actual simultaneous occurrence based on combination frequencies of individual mutants in a population (Robinson, 1959). The number of markers is yet too limited to detect loose linkages in small samples, and the ratios of recombinant alternatives in a population might obscure any linkage. As a matter of curiosity dilute was compared with long hair and polydactyly, and the predicted and expected values for simultaneous occurrence concurred closely. 4. DSCUSSON n comparing the Boston population to those of London, Singapore and Mishima, a number of interesting points are noted. The gene frequencies of mutants in these populations are summarised in table 4. TABLE 4 Frequencies of non-wild type alleles in four cat populations. See text for discussion Allele Boston London Singapore Mishima ) a jl t" d W S.19.64 o.ooo 44 4 22 44 76 oo2 o8i 14 OO4 '8 O o6o 2.ii 1 12 5 O9 79 O'o15 The gene frequency for red in Boston stands between that of London and Singapore, differing significantly from both (x2 and 15 8 respectively). Beyond saying that the frequency of this allele may vary widely (perhaps due to human preference, Searle, 1959) the interpretation of these differences is open to speculation. Searle (i 959) suggests that the incidence of red increases from Western Europe to Eastern Asia. Whether Boston fits into this clime by virtue of non- English contributions or differs because of some local pressure remains to be seen. The incidence of the self (non-tabby) allele in Boston's population

GENE FREQUENCES N CATS 51 is high, as in the case in London, Singapore and Mishima. n the combination frequency of self, both Boston and Singapore (which do not differ significantly from one another) differ significantly from London and Mishima (between which there is no significant difference). Such comparisons, however, are complicated by the fact that the expression of tabby (+t, tb) is independent of the condition of the agouti, self locus in a red animal. Hence the phenotype frequency of tabby will be dependent upon the gene frequency of red. Therefore, the differences between Boston and Singapore on the one hand and London on the other will be accentuated while the apparent correspondence of London and Mishima will be minimised. A further consequence of the expression of tabby in all red individuals is that the frequency of tabby among males may be significantly higher than in females, e.g. in Boston the phenotype frequency of non-tabby in females is o42 while in males it is o28. Nevertheless, it appears that the agouti, self-alternatives have little differential advantage under a wide range of environmental situations. n contrast to the relatively uniform distribution of agouti and self, the striped, blotched and Abyssinian alternatives are very different. Especially interesting is the low frequency of blotched tabby (t") in Boston compared to London. The combination frequency difference is highly significant (x2 88.5). This is a second indication that Boston's cat population is unrelated to that of London, although not necessarily to England, as Searle (personal communication) has suggested that London may be atypical for England. Clarification of these differences must await sampling of other English and American cities and repetition of the survey of London to ascertain whether the frequency f1b is increasing, decreasing, or static. The frequency of d dilution is remarkably high in Boston. This may be due to human selection, since so-called" Maltese" cats appear to be popular with the local citizenry. This factor and polydactyly, also locally prized, are the only characters noted which distinguish Boston clearly from all other cities yet studied. 5. SUMMARY A group of 299 cats from Boston, Massachusetts and vicinity were found to represent a random breeding population. The gene frequencies of eight mutants were computed. Differences and similarities between this population and those of London, Singapore and Mishima, Japan are discussed. 6. REFERENCES KOMA, T. 1952. ncidence of the genes for coat color in Japanese cats. Annot. Zool. Japonenses, 25, 29-21. ROBNSON, ROY. 1959. Genetics of the domestic cat. Bibliographia Genet., 8, 27-62. SEARLE, A. G. 1949. Gene frequencies in London's cats. Jour. Genet., 214-22. SEARLE, A.. 1959. A study of variation in Singapore cats. Jour. Genet., 56, 1 128.