Including data call, instructions for participating laboratories, data definition, reporting procedure.

Similar documents
EARS-Net Belgium Data call for 2016: Instructions for participating laboratories, including data definition. (version 4, 20/3/2017)

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) reporting protocol TESSy - The European Surveillance System

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) reporting protocol TESSy - The European Surveillance System

EARS-Net REPORTING PROTOCOL. Version 2, 2012

EARS Net Report, Quarter

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

What s new in EUCAST methods?

EUCAST-and CLSI potency NEO-SENSITABS

National Clinical Guideline Centre Pneumonia Diagnosis and management of community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Main objectives of the EURL EQAS s

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

9.4 Antimicrobial Resistance

Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program 2018 SURVEILLANCE FOR HEALTHCARE ACQUIRED CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SHUNT ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS

9.5 Antimicrobial Resistance

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

TECHNICAL REPORT External quality assessment of laboratory performance European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net), 2017

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Summary of the latest data on antibiotic resistance in the European Union

PROTOCOL for serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella test strains

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Introduction. Antimicrobial Usage ESPAUR 2014 Previous data validation Quality Premiums Draft tool CDDFT Experience.

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing microorganisms; state of the art. Laurent POIREL

Antibacterial Resistance In Wales

Mechanism of antibiotic resistance

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

UNDERSTANDING YOUR DATA: THE ANTIBIOGRAM

Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance from sentinel public hospitals, South Africa, 2013

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

Non-Susceptibility of Bacterial Pathogens Causing Hospital-Onset Pneumonia UK and Ireland,

SMART WORKFLOW SOLUTIONS Introducing DxM MicroScan WalkAway System* ...

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Antimicrobial resistance (EARS-Net)

Streptococcus pneumoniae. Oxacillin 1 µg as screen for beta-lactam resistance

1 INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES OUTLINE OF THE SALM/CAMP EQAS

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE SURVEILLANCE FROM SENTINEL PUBLIC HOSPITALS, SOUTH AFRICA, 2014

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Update on Resistance and Epidemiology of Nosocomial Respiratory Pathogens in Asia. Po-Ren Hsueh. National Taiwan University Hospital

Interpreting Microbiology reports for better Clinical Decisions Interpreting Antibiogrammes

HUSRES Annual Report 2007 Martti Vaara.

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

21 st Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines Peer Review Report Antibiotics Review

Defining Extended Spectrum b-lactamases: Implications of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration- Based Screening Versus Clavulanate Confirmation Testing

EUCAST Subcommitee for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms (ESDReM)

Recommendations for Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Restrictive Interventions in Acute Hospitals in Ireland

Surveillance for Antimicrobial Resistance and Preparation of an Enhanced Antibiogram at the Local Level. janet hindler

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

Service Delivery and Safety Department World Health Organization, Headquarters

Antibacterial Resistance In Wales

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

How is Ireland performing on antibiotic prescribing?

Quality assurance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing

BACTERIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY REPORT: 2016 (January 2016 December 2016)

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Measuring Antibiotic Use in NHSN

Approach to pediatric Antibiotics

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

Antimicrobial Resistance Strains

INCIDENCE OF BACTERIAL COLONISATION IN HOSPITALISED PATIENTS WITH DRUG-RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS

Antibiotic Usage Guidelines in Hospital

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Urine - Gram Positive Susceptibility Reporting 1 Staphylococcus species, MRSA...11

Antimicrobial Update. Alison MacDonald Area Antimicrobial Pharmacist NHS Highland April 2018

Background and Plan of Analysis

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(3):

Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter EURL AR activities in framework of the new EU regulation Lina Cavaco

Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR)

Jean-Winoc Decousser 1*, Paul-Louis Woerther 1, Claude-James Soussy 1, Marguerite Fines-Guyon 2 and Michael J. Dowzicky 3

PIPERACILLIN- TAZOBACTAM INJECTION - SUPPLY PROBLEMS

CONSUMPTION OF ANTIMICROBIAL DRUGS AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN PROBLEMATIC FOR HOSPITAL INFECTIOUS PATHOLOGY BACTERIA

APPENDIX III - DOUBLE DISK TEST FOR ESBL

Available online at ISSN No:

The UK 5-year AMR Strategy - a brief overview - Dr Berit Muller-Pebody National Infection Service Public Health England

Original Articles. K A M S W Gunarathne 1, M Akbar 2, K Karunarathne 3, JRS de Silva 4. Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health, 2011; 40(4):

Bacterial Pathogens in Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern from a Teaching Hospital, Bengaluru, India

Transcription:

EARS-Net Belgium 2016 - Protocol: Including data call, instructions for participating laboratories, data definition, reporting procedure. (version 7, 6/7/2017) Questions on this document can be directed towards: Karl Mertens Scientific Institute for Public Health (WIV-ISP) Rue Juliette Wytsmanstraat 141050 Brussels Tel 026425795, email: karl.mertens@wiv-isp.be 1

Introduction This document gives instructions to laboratories within Belgium to submit data for 2016 to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). EARS-Net is the main EU epidemiologic surveillance system for Anti-Microbial Resistance (AMR), and data reported from the network serve as important indicators on the occurrence and spread of AMR in European countries (Ref 1). On a yearly basis, EARS-Net collects and reports across European countries data on AMR against relevant agents within commonly occurring pathogens isolated from clinical invasive samples in humans. National data collection and submitting to EU for BE is organized by the Healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance service of the Scientific Institute of Public Health (IPH/NSIH, Brussels, BE). Participation to EARS-Net BE for the year 2016 is voluntary. This document relies on the standards and definitions that are laid out by EARS-Net (Ref 2) and summarizes these for participating laboratories. Differences with previous versions of the annual EARS- Net data call for BE are as follows: Addition of objectives; Addition of case definition for AMR and inclusion criteria for tests, samples, isolates; Addition of Data definition following the one of EARS-Net; Removal of the MS Excel template for submitting data, this is replaced by general instructions on the file format and description of variables and code values. Addition of procedure for submitting EARS-Net data by national reference laboratories; Addition of procedure for External Quality Assessment. EARS-Net Case definition for AMR and inclusion criteria EARS-Net uses the following case definition for AMR (see Ref 2 pages 26-28 for full details). The bacterial species under surveillance are Streptococcus pneumonia (STRPNE), Staphylococcus aureus (STAAUR), Enterococcus faecalis (ENCFAE), Enterococcus faecium (ENCFAI), Escherichia coli (ESCCOL), Klebsiella pneumonia (KLEPNE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSEAER), Acinetobacter spp (ACISPP). All isolates from blood (STRPNE, STAAUR, ENCFAE, ENCFAI, ESCCOL, KLEPNE, PSEAER, ACISPP) and/or cerebrospinal fluid (STRPNE, ESCCOL, KLEPNE, PSEAER, ACISPP), for which a susceptibility test has been performed, have to be included. A pathogen is defined as clinically susceptible, clinically intermediate or clinically resistant to an antibiotic agent according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, Ref 3) clinical breakpoints, i.e. clinical MIC breakpoints and their inhibition zone diameter correlates. Although EARS-Net encourages the use of EUCAST clinical breakpoints, laboratories using other guidelines are still welcome to submit data if the use of clinical guidelines is specified on the level of the AMR test (variable 37 ReferenceGuidelinesSIR of Table 3). The combinations of microorganisms x sample types x AMR tests that should be included in EARS-Net data are given in Table 1, these 2

combinations serve the full set of microorganism/antimicrobial group combinations that are under regular surveillance by EARS-Net as displayed in Table 2. Following the above case definition for AMR, the participating laboratory should prepare and submit annual EARS-Net data for 2016 in the form of an electronic data file in which each individual observation holds info on a particular isolate x sample x AMR test result on a sample that was taken in 2016. All results belonging to a combination of isolates (pathogens), sample types and AMR tests given in Table 1 should be submitted. Next to these AMR tests, supplementary info on confirmation tests for selected pathogens is collected as well. These are tests for detection of PCR meca-gene (Table 3 variable 20) and detection of PBP2a-agglutination (Table 3 variable 21) of Staphyloccocus aureus isolates, for serotype (Table 3 variable 22) of Streptococcus pneumonia isolates, and for detection of Extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL, Table 3 variable 23) and detection of Carbapenemases (Table 3 variable 24) of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia isolates. All laboratories in BE that performed susceptibility tests corresponding to the above defined sample types, isolates and AMR (or confirmation) tests are invited to participate. EARS-Net defines no other inclusion criteria besides the ones of the two previous paragraphs. Importantly, no restrictions are placed on the type of patients to include. te however that several variables are collected describing sample and patient characteristics such as a patient s hospitalization status or the ward in the hospital in which a sample was taken (see variables 15, 16, 17, 19 of Table 3). EARS-Net data definition The data file of a particular laboratory will contain variables on the isolate and AMR test level. That is, it will include the info on a particular AMR test as a separate observation, and repeat all info on the level of the isolate over all included AMR tests. Tables 3 and 4 give the data collection definition for isolate and AMR test info, respectively. Variables are numbered and named according to the EARS-Net reporting protocol (Ref 2). Sometimes, old variable names are given as well. Participating laboratories should only submit data on variables for which information can be collected and submitted. Variables 7 (sample date), 9 (laboratory code), 10 (sample type), 11 (patient id), 18 (pathogen), 25 (AMR test) and 26 (test result) are mandatory variables (= Yes ), files without at least these variables cannot be processed by IPH/NSIH. Next to these mandatory variables, other variables are labeled recommended (=, but recommended ) because they contain important characteristics of the patient or the hospital stay if the sample was taken in a hospital. The rest of the variables in Tables 3 and 4 specify information on supplementary tests on the isolate and on quantitative susceptibility of the AMR test or guidelines used to perform this test, and are optional. The data definition of Tables 3 and 4 should be taken as a guideline, and does not need to be followed 100% strictly. Possible alterations that are accepted: 3

Participating laboratories are free to use any of these variable names or code values, or use their own nomenclature providing they can provide correspondence with this data definition. The use of uppercase and lowercase characters in variable names and code values should be ignored, as everything will be converted to lowercase. rules to avoid duplicate observations are defined for the data submitted by the laboratory; these will be implemented by IPH/NSIH during preparation of national EARS-Net data. AMR tests for which results are submitted need not be limited to the ones shown in Table 1; after conversion, IPH/NSIH will only keep the ones belonging to the requested combinations. A participating laboratory can submit its results on the AMR test level in horizontal format as opposed to the vertical manner of the data definition of Table 4. In such horizontal format, the AMR test results for a particular isolate will be displayed in columns side-by side (each column representing an AMR test), instead of as separate observations. Also, when submitting horizontal AMR test data, please make sure to indicate info on variable 37 ReferenceGuidelinesSIR separately should a particular AMR test not follow EUCAST guidelines. During preparation of national EARS-Net data, IPH/NSIH will try to merge the AMR test data from a local laboratory with the data provided by the national reference laboratory and done on the same sample isolate. To make this possible, the local and reference laboratories need to submit EARS-Net data in which identifiers of exchanged isolates are constructed exactly the same; these are variables Patient ID (variable 11) and Isolate ID (variable 14). Furthermore, the national reference laboratory needs to submit EARS-Net data containing a clear identifier of the local laboratory (variable 7) providing each sample. Submitting EARS-Net data for 2016 and further treatment of data Data needs to be submitted to IPH/NSIH in the form of a flat-text data file, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format or similar. If MS Excel is used, the use formatting such as calculated fields or hiding of columns or rows should be avoided. MS Access files are not accepted. Data files may not exceed 40Mb, please spread the data file over multiple messages if this is the case. Submitting EARS-Net data proceeds by sending an email with attachment to nsihdata@wiv-isp.be. Please make sure to indicate the full laboratory name and address in the mail message. A laboratory that tested zero isolates in 2016 for a particular pathogens or series of pathogens (with no resulting AMR data), is invited to report this in the mail message as well. Please refer to the EARS-NET BE webpage on http://www.nsih.be for the deadline for submitting laboratory data. Reporting procedure 4

Upon reception, laboratory data will be converted and standardized by the IPH-NSIH unit to the EARS- NET 2016 data definition. In an intermediate step, the laboratory might be contacted for validation of unclear test (and other) codes should these occur. Only laboratory data standardized towards the (Pathogen, Specimen, Antibiotic) combinations of Table 1 of this protocol are kept for further treatment and analysis. De-duplication of annual laboratory data goes as follows: For each laboratory and pathogen: (1) Aggregating all tests results (variable Antibiotic) within the same isolate (variable IsolateId), prioritizing test results (variable SIR) according to R>I>S. (2) For each patient (variable PatientCounter), results on the first occurring specimen (variables SampleDate, Specimen) within the study year are then kept. In case of multiple samples on the same date for the same patient, prioritize on sample type (CSF>BLOOD), and on test results (R>I>S) after that. De-duplicated laboratory data is then analyzed and reported in the form of a MS Excel (XLS) file. Analysis occurs always for a particular pathogen, results of which are given in the relevant worksheet of the report file. Both indicators on sample or patient characteristics as well as on resistance (or nonsusceptibility) rate for relevant antibiotic groups are calculated. Indicators for sample characteristics are similar for each pathogen, these are Number of Samples, Percentage of BLOOD samples, Percentage of Female Patients, Percentage of Patients Aged>75, Percentage of Patients Aged>85 and Percentage of Hospitalized Patients. For each indicator, the annual result for the laboratory is given in column #,% Ind=True/Tot, with further specification of the total number of samples and number of samples corresponding to the particular indicator, and the binomial 95% confidence interval in case the indicator is a proportion. Indicators for antibiotic resistance follow those of Table 2. This table follows the EU EARSNET protocol (Ref 2) as a basis, and is updated with following supplementary indicators that take into account results of confirmation tests for specific pathogens. These supplementary indicators are MRSA accounting for detection of MecA-gene and/or PBP2a-agglutination (Staphylococcus aureus), % Positive ESBL within samples Resistant to Third-Generation Cephalosporins (Escherichia Coli, Klebsiella Pneumoniae), % Positive Carbapenemase within samples Resistant to Carbapenems (Escherichia Coli, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp). National results for these last two indicators are only calculated within the group of laboratories that submitted results for confirmation tests ESBL and/or Carbapenemases. Rates for antimicrobial resistance are always reported in the form of a percentage (column % (I)R/SIR ), that is the number of samples that tested R=Resistant (or IR=n- Susceptible if specified in the antimicrobial group) over 100 samples that were tested for the antimicrobials of a particular antimicrobial group. In separate columns, the number of the tested samples ( # SIR ), the number of resistant or non-susceptible samples ( # (I)R ), as well as the binomial 95 % Confidence Interval ( % 95% CI ) are given as well. Inspection and validation by the laboratory of the results displayed in the XLS Laboratory file is a crucial step in obtaining reliable national results on Antimicrobial resistance. One important error that might 5

occur is that not all tests for which results were submitted by the laboratory are accounted for in the XLS report, and this due to improper or insufficient standardization of laboratory-specific antimicrobial test codes. For example, a wrong standard test code might be assigned to a particular laboratory-specific test description, which can result in susceptibility results becoming unavailable for the specific Pathogen x Antimicrobial group combination relying on this specific test. The prevent this error, the laboratory should carefully verify the correspondence between the total number of samples that were submitted for a particular pathogen and the total number of tests that were done for a particular Antimicrobial group, as shown in cells C7 and C17:C22 of the XLS report respectively. Any difference between these should be verified to be due to laboratory policy or the possibility of wrongly standardized test codes. To facilitate this verification, the Tests worksheet of the XLS report shows all test codes isolated from the laboratory data and how these were standardized to the EARS NET BE 2016 definition, showing both overall totals as well as totals by Pathogen. Any errors in this standardization should be reported back to EARSNET BE national coordinator at IPH/NSIH for immediate correction and subsequent recreation of the XLS laboratory report. te also that the Data worksheet shows the laboratory data standardized according to the EARS NET 2016 definition, with addition of a set of N000* variables identifying the original patient variables used by the laboratory. Next to the results of a particular laboratory, the relevant results of the national distribution of laboratory resistance rates is given under heading BE, and this in the form of number of laboratories submitting samples, total number of samples ( # SIR ), total number of resistant or non-susceptible samples ( # (I)R ), the database mean ( % Mean (db) ), mean of laboratory means ( % Mean (of LAB means) ), and percentiles 10, 25, 50 (median), 75 and 90. These results are also available for the indicators on sample characteristics. Finally, the results on Antibiotic resistance for each pathogen and its relevant antimicrobial groups are shown visually as well, and this in form of the Laboratory resistance rate and its 95% Confidence interval (in red), and a modified Box&Whisker (BW) plot of the national distribution of the Laboratory means and percentiles (in grey). External Quality Assessment (EQA) All laboratories reporting data to EARS-Net will be invited to participate in the annual EQA. This is a service contracted by ECDC with United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (UK NEQAS) at Public Health England. The annual procedure for this EQA is as follows: UK NEQAS contacts the coordinator of EARS-Net BE at NSIH/IPH once a year, to update the contact details of participating laboratories and compile a final list of addresses of laboratories to be included in the EQA for BE. 6

UK NEQAS then contacts the potential EQA participants with information on EQA reporting requirements and timelines, the provisions for intellectual property, data ownership and sharing, and planned post-eqa activities such as reports and publications. At the time of the actual EQA (most often early autumn), UK NEQAS prepares one package for each laboratory, containing a set of at least 6 bacterial isolates, safety instructions, and detailed information about routines for reporting of results. In addition to collection of EQA results, information on the use of methods (i.e. automated systems, disc diffusion, E-test etc.) and guidelines for clinical breakpoints as well as on the availability of and the requirement and/or obligation to participate to a national EQA scheme should be collected from the laboratories (type of EQA, mandatory, voluntary etc.). The packages (already labeled with the specific local laboratory address) are sent to the coordinator of EARS-Net BE. Laboratories register their results in an on-line database provided by UK NEQAS. The results will be compiled and analyzed by UK NEQAS, which will provide individual feed-back of the results to each participating laboratory; country reports to each national EQA coordinator providing all EQA results from the laboratories in the country. The report should include the results from all participating laboratories (including a national summary and results for each individual laboratory) and include a short conclusion on the capacity of participating laboratories and if needed, recommendations for improvement. Restrictions and confidentiality measures IPH/NSIH applies the same restrictions and confidentiality measures to EARS-Net data for 2016 of a particular laboratory and its contents as done with all other IPH/NSIH surveillances. This means that a particular laboratory s data (or its contents) will only serve the objectives stated in the EARS-Net protocol. When institute (laboratory or hospital)-specific results are reported or presented, the identity of a particular institute will be only disclosed to the designated contact person(s) of the institute itself. References Ref 1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2015. Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). Stockholm: ECDC; 2017. (http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/publications/antimicrobial-resistanceeurope-2015.pdf ) Ref 2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. TESSy - The European Surveillance System. EARS-Net reporting protocol 2017. Stockholm: ECDC; 2017. (http://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/ears-net-reporting-protocol-2017.pdf ) 7

Ref 3. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines and breakpoints to determine clinical antimicrobial susceptibility (available at http://www.eucast.org/ ). 8

Table 1: Microorganism, specimen source and antimicrobial agent combinations under surveillance by EARS-Net Microorganism Specimen source Antimicrobial test Streptococcus pneumoniae (STRPNE) blood (BLOOD); cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Azithromycin (AZM) Cefotaxime (CTX) Ceftriaxone (CRO) Clarithromycin (CLR) Erythromycin (ERY) Levofloxacin (LVX) Moxifloxacin (MFX) rfloxacin (NOR) Oxacillin (OXA) Penicillin (PEN) Staphylococcus aureus (STAAUR) blood (BLOOD) Cefoxitin (FOX) Cloxacillin (CLO) Ciprofloxacin (CIP) Daptomycin (DAP) Dicloxacillin (DIC) Flucloxacillin (FLC) Levofloxacin (LVX) Linezolid (LNZ) Meticillin (MET) rfloxacin (NOR) Ofloxacin (OFX) Oxacillin (OXA) Rifampin (RIF) Vancomycin (VAN) MecA-gene (MECA) PBP2A-agglutination (PB2A) Enterococcus faecalis (ENCFAE) blood (BLOOD) Ampicillin (AMP) Amoxicillin (AMX) Gentamicin-High (GEH) Linezolid (LNZ) Teicoplanin (TEC) Vancomycin (VAN) Enterococcus faecium (ENCFAI) blood (BLOOD) Ampicillin (AMP) Amoxicillin (AMX) Gentamicin-High (GEH) Linezolid (LNZ) Teicoplanin (TEC) Vancomycin (VAN) Escherichia coli (ESCCOL) blood (BLOOD); cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Amikacin (AMK) Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC) Ampicillin (AMP) Amoxicillin (AMX) Cefepime (FEP)* Cefotaxime (CTX) Ceftazidime (CAZ) Ceftriaxone (CRO) Ciprofloxacin (CIP) Colistin (COL) Ertapenem (ERT) Gentamicin (GEN) Imipenem (IPM) Levofloxacin (LVX) Meropenem (MEM) Moxifloxacin (MFX) Netilmicin (NET) rfloxacin (NOR) Ofloxacin (OFX) Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) 9

Microorganism Specimen source Antimicrobial test Polymyxin B (POL) Tigecycline (TCG) Tobramycin (TOB) Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) Carbapenemase (CPE) Klebsiella pneumoniae (KLEPNE) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSEAER) Acinetobacter spp. (ACISPP) blood (BLOOD); cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) blood (BLOOD); cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) blood (BLOOD); cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Amikacin (AMK) Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC) Cefepime (FEP) Cefotaxime (CTX) Ceftazidime (CAZ) Ceftriaxone (CRO) Ciprofloxacin (CIP) Colistin (COL) Ertapenem (ERT) Gentamicin (GEN) Imipenem (IPM) Levofloxacin (LVX) Meropenem (MEM) Moxifloxacin (MFX) Netilmicin (NET) rfloxacin (NOR) Ofloxacin (OFX) Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) Polymyxin B (POL) Tigecycline (TCG) Tobramycin (TOB) Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) Carbapenemase (CPE) Amikacin (AMK) Cefepime (FEP) Ceftazidime (CAZ) Ciprofloxacin (CIP) Colistin (COL) Gentamicin (GEN) Imipenem (IPM) Levofloxacin (LVX) Meropenem (MEM) Netilmicin (NET) Piperacillin (PIP) Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP) Polymyxin B (POL) Tobramycin (TOB) Carbapenemase (CPE) Amikacin (AMK) Ciprofloxacin (CIP) Colistin (COL) Gentamicin (GEN) Imipenem (IPM) Levofloxacin (LVX) Meropenem (MEM) Netilmicin (NET) Polymyxin B (POL) Tobramycin (TOB) Carbapenemase (CPE) 10

Table 2: Microorganism and antimicrobial group combinations under EARS-Net BE surveillance Microorganism Antimicrobial group Antimicrobial agents Escherichia coli Aminopenicillins AMX, AMP (ESCCOL) Fluoroquinolones CIP, OFX, LVX, MFX, NOR Third-generation cephalosporins CTX, CRO, CAZ Third-generation cephalosporins, ESBL+ CTX, CRO, CAZ, ESBL Aminoglycosides GEN, TOB, NET Carbapenems IPM, MEM Carbapenems, CPE+ IPM, MEM, CPE Polymyxins POL, COL Klebsiella pneumoniae Fluoroquinolones CIP, OFX, LVX, MFX,NOR (KLEPNE) Third-generation cephalosporins CTX, CRO, CAZ Third-generation cephalosporins, ESBL+ CTX, CRO, CAZ, ESBL Aminoglycosides GEN, TOB, NET Carbapenems IPM, MEM Carbapenems, CPE+ IPM, MEM, CPE Polymyxins POL, COL Pseudomonas aeruginosa Piperacillin-tazobactam TZP (PSEAER) Ceftazidime CAZ Fluoroquinolones CIP, LVX Aminoglycosides GEN, TOB, NET Carbapenems IPM, MEM Carbapenems, CPE+ IPM, MEM, CPE Amikacin AMK Polymyxins POL, COL Acinetobacter spp Fluoroquinolones CIP, LVX (ACISPP) Aminoglycosides GEN, TOB, NET Carbapenems IPM, MEM Carbapenems, CPE+ IPM, MEM, CPE Amikacin AMK Polymyxins POL, COL Streptococcus pneumonia Penicillins PEN, OXA (STRPNE) Macrolides ERY, CLR, AZM Fluoroquinolones LVX, NOR, MFX Third-generation cephalosporins CTX, CRO Staphylococcus aureus MRSA MET, OXA, FOX, FLC, CLO, DIC (STAAUR) MRSA, CON+ MET, OXA, FOX, FLC, CLO, DIC, MECA, PBP2A Rifampicin RIF Fluoroquinolones CIP, OFX, LVX, NOR Linezolid LNZ Vancomycin VAN Daptomycin DAP Enterococcus faecalis High-level aminoglycoside resistance GEH (ENCFAE) Vancomycin VAN Enterococcus faecium Aminopenicillins AMX, AMP (ENCFAI) Teicoplanin TEC Linezolid LNZ 11

Table 3: Epidemiological variables at isolate level (variables in grey are required) 7 SampleDate (SamplingDate) Date when sample was taken. This date should fall in 2016. Yes Date Exact date only, YYYY-MM-DD 9 - Laboratory (LabId) Laboratory code unique for each laboratory within the country, assigned by national EARS-Net coordinator within IPH te: this is not the IPH/NSIH hospital code; Contact the national EARS-Net coordinator within IPH if unknown. need to provide this code if fixed for the entire file, in this case please provide the code as part of the email exchange For data submitted by a national reference laboratory: this is the code of the local laboratory that provided the sample. Yes d Value 10 - Specimen (SampleType) Isolate source The source of the isolate (i.e. blood) Yes. d Value Enter data corresponding to the requested combination of Pathogen, Specimen and Antibiotic in Table 1 Microorganism, specimen source and antimicrobial agent combinations under surveillance by EARS-Net. BLOOD = blood CSF = Cerebrospinal fluid 11 PatientId used by the lab to specify patient. te: this code should identify the patient, not the admission within a hospital. Upon processing by IPH/NSIH, this code will be converted to an anonymous (patientcounter) numeric code. Yes Text 12 - Gender Gender, but recommended d Value M = Male F = Female O = Other UNK = Unknown 13 - Age (DateBirth) Age of the patient when the sample was taken, Alternatively, provide that patient s birth date. 12

, but recommended Numeric Integer 14 IsolateId Isolate ID; for each isolate, unique within lab and year Text code assigned by lab to specify isolate, but recommended Text 15 Hospital Identifier for the hospital where the sample was taken. Use a national hospital code (NSIH or RIZIV/INAMI for example), or simply the name of the hospital if unknown. te: this is not the laboratory code!, but recommended Text 16 - PatientType (AdmissionType) Origin of patient. Is the patient at the moment the sample is taken admitted in a hospital (inpatient), or not (outpatient). Patients that go to the hospital for Dialysis, other Day Hospital Care and to Emergency room should be classified as O for the field PatientType. All other patient that are admitted in the hospital as inpatients should be classified as INPAT., but recommended d Value INPAT= Admitted (Inpatient) OUTPAT= Outpatient O =Other (e.g. emergency room) UNK=Unknown 17 - HospitalUnitType Hospital department (at time of sample collection), but recommended d Value INTMED =Internal Medicine PEDS =Paediatrics/neonatal PEDSICU=Paediatrics/neonatal ICU SURG =Surgery ONCOL=Haematology/Oncology OBGYN=Obstetrics/Gynaecology ICU=Intensive Care Unit ED=Emergency Department URO=Urology Ward INFECT=Infectious Disease Ward O =Other UNK=Unknown 18 - Pathogen Pathogen Species and genus of the pathogen which has been isolated from the sample. Yes 13

Validation rule Validation rule Validation rule Validation rule d Value Provide data corresponding to the requested combination of Pathogen, Specimen and Antibiotic of Table 1 Microorganism, specimen source and antimicrobial agent combinations under surveillance by EARS-Net. STRPNE=Streptococcus pneumoniae STAAUR=Staphylococcus aureus ENCFAE=Enterococcus faecalis ENCFAI=Enterococcus faecium ESCCOL=Escherichia coli KLEPNE=Klebsiella pneumoniae PSEAER=Pseudomonas aeruginosa ACISPP=Acinetobacter spp. 19 - DateOfHospitalisation (AdmissionDate) Date of admission in hospital Date Exact date only, YYYY-MM-DD 20 - ResultPCRmec Detection of PCR meca-gene d Value POS=positive NEG=negative UNK=unknown To be reported only if Pathogen=STAAUR. 21 - ResultPbp2aAggl Detection of PBP2a-agglutination d Value POS=positive; NEG=negative; UNK=unknown To be reported only if Pathogen=STAAUR. 22 - Serotype Serotype/group of the pathogen isolated from the sample. Reference: Danish Kauffman-Lund scheme from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Pneumococci at the Danish Serum Institute. d Value Contact the national EARSNet BE coordinator within IPH/NSIH for a detailed list of codes To be reported only if Pathogen=STRPNE. 23 - ESBL Detection of ESBL d Value POS=positive NEG=negative UNK=unknown To be reported only if Pathogen= ESCCOL or KLEPNE. 24 - ResultCarbapenemases Detection of Carbapenemases. This refers to phenotypic test for carbapenemase activity (e.g. the Modified Hodge Test - MHT). 14

Validation rule d Value POS=positive NEG=negative UNK=unknown To be reported only if Pathogen= ESCCOL or KLEPNE or PSEAER or ACISPP 15

Table 4: Epidemiological variables at AMR test level (variables in grey are required) 25 - Antibiotic (AntibioticECDC) Antimicrobial code Yes d Value, Provide data corresponding to the requested combination of Pathogen, Specimen and Antibiotic of Table 1 Microorganism, specimen source and antimicrobial agent combinations under surveillance by EARS-Net. 26 - SIR (TestResult) Final interpretation result of all different susceptibility tests performed Yes d Value S=susceptible; I=intermediate; R=resistant 27 - ResultZoneSign Zone test operator (> < =). This field can indicate if a value of the zone diameter of the disk test is less than" (<); equal to or less than (< =); "equal to" (=); equal to or greater than (>=); or "greater than" (>) the value indicated in the following field. d Value < <= = >= > 28 - ResultZoneValue Zone test Value in mm. Numeric Integer 29 - ResultZoneSIR Zone test interpretation. d Value S=susceptible; I=intermediate; R=resistant 30 - ResultMICSign MIC test operator (> < =). type < <= = >= This field can indicate if a value of the zone diameter of the MIC test is less than" (<); equal to or less than (< =); "equal to" (=); equal to or greater than (>=); or "greater than" (>) the value indicated in the following field. d Value 16

> 31 - ResultMICValue MIC test value in mg/l. Text If <1 then float, if >=1 then integer 32 - ResultMICSIR MIC test interpretation. d Value S=susceptible; I=intermediate; R=resistant 33 - ResultEtestSign Gradient strip test operator (> < =). This field can indicate if a value of the zone diameter of the gradient strip is less than" (<); equal to or less than (< =); "equal to" (=); equal to or greater than (>=); or "greater than" (>) the value indicated in the following field. d Value < <= = >= > 34 - ResultEtestValue Gradient strip test value (Value in mg/l). Text If <1 then float, if >=1 then integer. The value 1.5 is also allowed. 35 - ResultEtestSIR Gradient strip test interpretation. d Value S=susceptible; I=intermediate; R=resistant 36 - DiskLoad Disk content (only if Zone test). This field can be used to mention the load of the antimicrobial disk used. Please mention the value and the Units (e.g. mcg, Units or IU). Text Value and units: i.e. UI, mcg. 37 - ReferenceGuidelinesSIR To differentiate use of CSLI and EUCAST guidelines for determining clinical breakpoint for antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolate 17

d value EUCAST = European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing CLSI = Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute NAT = National O = Other 18