The Dangerous Dogs Control (Rural Municipalities) Regulations

Similar documents
93.02 DANGEROUS ANIMALS.

RESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance:

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF POWASSAN BY-LAW NO ***********************************************************************

CITY OF PITT MEADOWS Dog Control Bylaw

St. Paul City Ordinance

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

The Stray Animals Regulations, 1999

CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )

TOWN OF LANIGAN BYLAW 2/2004

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

ORDINANCE O AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE KEEPING OF PIT BULL BREED DOGS WITHIN THE CITY OF ARKADELPHIA, ARKANSAS.

TOWN OF COMOX DRAFT CONSOLIDATED BYLAW NO. 1322

Town of Niagara Niagara, Wisconsin 54151

TOWN OF LUMSDEN BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING, CONTROLLING, REGULATING AND IMPOUNDING OF DOGS.

PLEASE NOTE. authority of the Queen s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law.

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

TOWN OF LEROY BYLAW NO. 5/07 A BYLAW RESPECTING ANIMAL CONTROL

The Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 6, 2007

The Bison Breeder Associations Loan Guarantee Regulations

Chapter 6.08 ANIMAL CONTROL

Pit Bull Dog Licensing By-law

CORYELL COUNTY RABIES CONTROL ORDINANCE NO

Running at large prohibited. No cat shall be permitted to run at large within the limits of this City.

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF WARFIELD BYLAW 703

DISEASE CONTROL (EPIDEMIOLOGY) ANIMAL CONTROL REQUIREMENTS

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL 1 CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

The Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth

ANIMAL CONTROL CITY ANIMAL ORDINANCE

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS , AND CONSOLIDATED VERSION

CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW

LOCAL LAW NO. 1 DOG CONTROL LAW OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD

(3) BODILY INJURY means physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CORNWALL AS FOLLOWS:

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09

BY-LAW 560/ DOG TAG means a numbered metal tag issued by the Village when the Owner of a Dog licenses such Dog with the Town/Village.

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09 And AMENDMENT with BYLAW 428/11

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS BY-LAW NUMBER

ORDINANCE NO

Kokomo, IN Code of Ordinances CHAPTER 90: ANIMALS

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF HUMBOLDT BYLAW NO. 29/2013

Dangerous Dogs and Texas Law

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL


Chapter 506. Dangerous and Vicious Animals Adopted July 21, 2008

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

DANGEROUS DOGS AND WILD ANIMALS

Westwego, Code of Ordinances Page 1

TITLE 6 ANIMALS AND FOWL

Ordinance Amending the Animal Control and Protection Code Relating to Potentially Dangerous and Dangerous Animals

CHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF GEORGIAN BAY BY-LAW NO

BY THE TETON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

ANIMAL CONTROL IN BROWN COUNTY. Impoundment and Disposition of Animals Redemption and Destruction of Impounded Animals

DOG LICENCING BYLAW NO EFFECTIVE DATE JULY 24, 2000 CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY

CITY OF YORKTON SASKATCHEWAN BYLAW NO. 3/2003

TITLE 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 DOGS

TOWN OF PICTURE BUTTE BYLAW #690/92 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF PICTURE BUTTE TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING, CONTROL AND REGULATING DOGS.

ADDENDUM A CHAPTER 3 ANIMALS ARTICLE I - LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE

AND WHEREAS by motion 13-GC-253 the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Bracebridge deems it expedient to amend By-law ;

Page 47-1 rev

CHAPTER XII ANIMALS. .2 ANIMAL. Animal means every living creature, other than man, which may be affected by rabies.

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY COLORADO RESOLUTION NUMBER

Dog Licensing Regulation

SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO A Bylaw to regulate the keeping of dogs within the Keats Island Dog Control Service Area

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 411

County Board of County Commissioners to provide and maintain for the residents

APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE

TOWN OF POMFRET DOG ORDINANCE Originally Adopted May 22, 1984 Amended December 19, 2012 Amendment adopted October 1, 2014 Effective November 30, 2014

THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT DANGEROUS DOG CONTROL BYLAW NO. 2383

BYLAW NO TOWN OF VEGREVILLE

AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OR REGULATING THE OWNING OR KEEPING OF PIT BULL DOGS, PROVIDING FOR PERMITS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1063

TOWN OF LAKE LUZERNE Local Law # 3 of the Year Control of Dogs

R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER D.16

*State law reference(s)--rabies control, V.T.C.A., Health and Safety Code et seq.

BYLAW NO. 1/2005 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF REGINA BEACH FOR LICENSING DOGS AND REGULATING AND CONTROLLING PERSONS OWNING OR HARBOURING DOGS

Loretto City Code 600:00 (Rev. 2010) CHAPTER VI ANIMALS. (Repealed, Ord ) Added, Ord )

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

BY-LAW A By-law of the town of Rothesay Respecting Animal Control, Enacted Under the Municipalities Act, Section 96(1), R.S.N.B. 1973, c.

SUMMER VILLAGE OF WAIPAROUS BYLAW NO

TOWN OF CABOT, VERMONT ORDINANCE FOR THE CONTROL OF DOGS & WOLF-HYBRIDS

Ordinance for the Control of Dogs

A Bylaw to regulate and prohibit the keeping of Animals and to provide for the licencing, seizure, and impoundment of animals.

DISTRICT OF SOOKE BYLAW NO. 392

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

CITY OF SOUTHGATE CAMPBELL COUNTY, KENTUCKY ORDINANCE 18-15

K E N N E L L I C E N S E A P P L I C A T I O N

CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS. Owner: Any person, group of persons, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring animals.

Town of Whitby By-law #

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 92 OF TITLE IX OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF EAST GRAND RAPIDS

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO.

Transcription:

DANGEROUS DOGS CONTROL 1 The Dangerous Dogs Control (Rural Municipalities) Regulations Repealed by Chapter M-36.1 Reg 1 (effective January 1, 2006). Formerly Chapter R-26.1 Reg 7 (effective November 4, 1992) as amended by an Errata Notice (Gazetted December 31, 1992). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been incorporated for convenience of reference and the original statutes and regulations should be consulted for all purposes of interpretation and application of the law. In order to preserve the integrity of the original statutes and regulations, errors that may have appeared are reproduced in this consolidation.

2 Table of Contents DANGEROUS DOGS CONTROL 1 Title 2 Interpretation 3 Criteria for enclosure for dangerous dogs 4 Criteria for muzzle and leash for dangerous dogs 5 Insurance 6 Signs 7 Quarantine of dogs 8 Inoculation of dogs 9 Rabies test of dogs 10 Tattoo on dogs Appendix

DANGEROUS DOGS CONTROL 3 CHAPTER The Rural Municipality Act, 1989 Title 1 These regulations may be cited as The Dangerous Dogs Control (Rural Municipalities) Regulations. Interpretation 2 In these regulations: (a) Act means The Rural Municipality Act, 1989; (b) enclosure includes a dwelling place; (c) veterinarian means a member in good standing of the Saskatchewan Veterinary Medical Association. 20 Nov 92 cr-26.1 Reg 7 s2. Criteria for enclosure for dangerous dogs 3 The following criteria are prescribed for enclosures in which dogs declared to be dangerous pursuant to section 218 of the Act shall be kept: (a) the enclosure shall be constructed of wood or any other building material of sufficient strength and in a manner adequate to: (i) confine the dog; and (ii) prevent the entry of children of tender years; (b) the entrances and other areas by which entry to or exit from the enclosure may be made shall be locked or fastened in a manner adequate to prevent the dog from escaping from the enclosure; (c) the enclosure shall be at least 3 metres in length, 1.5 metres in width and 1.8 metres in height; (d) the enclosure shall have a top secured to the sides of the enclosure; (e) the enclosure shall: (i) have a floor secured to the sides of the enclosure; or (ii) have sides that are embedded in the ground to a depth of at least 0.6 metres; and (f) the enclosure shall: (i) provide protection from the elements for the dog; (ii) provide adequate light and ventilation for the dog; and (iii) be kept in a sanitary and clean condition. 20 Nov 92 cr-26.1 Reg 7 s3.

4 DANGEROUS DOGS CONTROL Criteria for muzzle and leash for dangerous dogs 4 Where a dog that has been declared to be dangerous pursuant to section 218 of the Act is not in an enclosure, the dog shall be equipped with a muzzle and be secured by a leash in accordance with the following criteria: (a) the dog shall be fitted with a collar or a harness for the body that is properly placed and fitted on the dog; (b) the movement of the dog shall be controlled by a person by means of a leash attached to the collar or harness on the dog; (c) the leash shall not exceed 1.2 metres in length and shall be constructed of a material having a tensile strength of at least 140 kilograms; (d) the muzzle on the dog shall be properly fitted on the dog to prevent it from biting any animal or person; and (e) the muzzle shall be fitted on the dog in such a manner that it will not interfere with the vision or respiration of the dog. 20 Nov 92 cr-26.1 Reg 7 s4. Insurance 5(1) Where a dog has been declared to be dangerous pursuant to section 218 of the Act, the owner of the dog, within 10 days of the date of the order, shall provide proof to the administrator of the municipality that the owner has obtained liability insurance in an amount not less than $300,000 for any bodily injury to or death of any person or domestic animal, or for damage to property, caused by the dog. (2) The owner shall maintain the insurance required by subsection (1) unless a judge waives that requirement pursuant to subsection 218(9) of the Act. 20 Nov 92 cr-26.1 Reg 7 s5. Signs 6(1) Where a dog has been declared to be dangerous pursuant to section 218 of the Act, the owner of the dog, within 10 days of the date of the order of the judge declaring the dog to be dangerous, shall display a sign on the owner s premises in the form illustrated in the Appendix warning of the presence of the dog. (2) A sign required by subsection (1) shall be placed at each entrance to the premises where the dog is kept and on the enclosure in which the dog is confined. (3) A sign required by subsection (1) shall be clearly visible and capable of being read from any adjacent public road. 20 Nov 92 cr-26.1 Reg 7 s6. Quarantine of dogs 7 Where a dog has bitten a person or a domestic animal, the owner of the dog shall, unless the dog is ordered to be destroyed, quarantine the dog for observation for symptoms of rabies for a period of not less than 10 days in accordance with the Animal Disease and Protection Act (Canada). 20 Nov 92 cr-26.1 Reg 7 s7.

DANGEROUS DOGS CONTROL 5 Inoculation of dogs 8(1) Where a dog has been declared to be dangerous pursuant to section 218 of the Act, the owner of the dog shall, within five days after the date of the order of the judge declaring the dog to be a dangerous dog, have the dog inoculated against rabies by a veterinarian and provide proof to the administrator of the municipality that the dog has been so inoculated. (2) Where the owner of a dog provides proof that the dog has been inoculated against rabies during the period of 12 months prior to the date of the order mentioned in subsection (1), the owner is not required to comply with that subsection until the expiration of 12 months after the date of inoculation of the dog. (3) The owner of a dog shall have the dog inoculated within each 12-month period following the inoculation mentioned in subsection (1) or (2) during the lifetime of the dog. 20 Nov 92 cr-26.1 Reg 7 s8. Rabies test of dogs 9(1) Every person who destroys a dog following the non-fatal biting of a person or domestic animal, whether the destruction is pursuant to an order of a judge or court or at the decision of the owner of the dog, shall, if the destruction is carried out before the completion of the quarantine period mentioned in section 7, retain the head of the dog in a manner usable for testing the dog for rabies. (2) Where a person destroys a dog in the circumstances described in subsection (1), the person shall immediately notify a veterinarian or a peace officer that he or she is in possession of the head of a dog to be tested for rabies. 20 Nov 92 cr-26.1 Reg 7 s9. Tattoo on dogs 10 Where a judge orders an owner of a dog to have the dog tattooed pursuant to section 218 of the Act, the owner shall, at his or her own expense and within 10 days of the date of the order, cause the dog to be tattooed on its ear or inside flank by a veterinarian by means of indelible or permanent ink with the number assigned to the dog by the municipality. 20 Nov 92 cr-26.1 Reg 7 s10.

6 DANGEROUS DOGS CONTROL Appendix 20 Nov 92 cr-26.1 Reg 7; 31 Dec 92 Errata. REGINA, SASKATCHEWAN Printed by the authority of THE QUEEN S PRINTER Copyright 1996