EUCAST Workshop: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with EUCAST breakpoints and methods

Similar documents
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing challenges. Linda Joyce St Vincent s Hospital Melbourne

M45: INFREQUENTLY ISOLATED OR FASTIDIOUS BACTERIA

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

What s new in EUCAST methods?

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

James H. Jorgensen 1 and Janet F. Hindler 2. L. Barth Reller and Melvin P. Weinstein, Section Editors

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

What is new in 2011: Methods and breakpoints in relation to subcommittees and expert groups. by author. Gunnar Kahlmeter, Derek Brown

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

EUCAST-and CLSI potency NEO-SENSITABS

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

SAMPLE (DO NOT COPY)

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

Background and Plan of Analysis

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Mark Your Calendars Now! Next Event Ships: September 14, 2015

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Streptococcus pneumoniae. Oxacillin 1 µg as screen for beta-lactam resistance

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

Vitek QC Sets. Vitek 2 Identification QC Sets

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

BactiReg3 Event Notes Module Page(s) 4-9 (TUL) Page 1 of 21

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

National Clinical Guideline Centre Pneumonia Diagnosis and management of community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults

Advanced Practice Education Associates. Antibiotics

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Einheit für pädiatrische Infektiologie Antibiotics - what, why, when and how?

EUCAST Subcommitee for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms (ESDReM)

Performance Information. Vet use only

Recommendations to take it forward!

against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria

Principles and Practice of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Microbiology Technical Workshop 25 th September 2013

Practical approach to Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and quality control

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Quality assurance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Towards Rational International Antibiotic Breakpoints: Actions from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Urine - Gram Positive Susceptibility Reporting 1 Staphylococcus species, MRSA...11

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 8)

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

HARDYDISK ANTIMICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST (AST) only

SEA-HLM-415 Distribution: General. Establishment of national laboratory-based surveillance of antimicrobial resistance

Version 9.1 March 2010

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library EUCAST The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing September 2010

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Defining Resistance and Susceptibility: What S, I, and R Mean to You

Interactive session: adapting to antibiogram. Thong Phe Heng Vengchhun Felix Leclerc Erika Vlieghe

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli

HUSRES Annual Report 2007 Martti Vaara.

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

microbiology testing services

Medicinal Chemistry 561P. 2 st hour Examination. May 6, 2013 NAME: KEY. Good Luck!

Surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in Australian pigs and chickens

Version 7, January 2008

Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR)

TECHNICAL REPORT External quality assessment of laboratory performance European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net), 2017

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. CRL Training course in AST Copenhagen, Denmark 23-27th Feb.

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

Design of antimicrobial susceptibility testing programmes relevant to aquaculture and aquacultural products

Main objectives of the EURL EQAS s

DISCLAIMER: ECHO Nevada emphasizes patient privacy and asks participants to not share ANY Protected Health Information during ECHO clinics.

C&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 2013 December 2015

Source: Portland State University Population Research Center (

21 st Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines Peer Review Report Antibiotics Review

This review is intended d to be a reference to describe the potential. Antimicrobial Efficacy

1 INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES OUTLINE OF THE SALM/CAMP EQAS

Antimicrobial Agents 101. SWACM 2011 Christopher Doern, Ph.D., D(ABMM)

Preliminary investigation of antibiotic resistant and susceptible Campylobacter in retail ground beef in the United States.

Penicillins - EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints (version 1.3)

Appropriate Management of Common Pediatric Infections. Blaise L. Congeni M.D. Akron Children s Hospital Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases

Version 8 January 2009

Version 1.01 (01/10/2016)

Version 13 January 2014

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

Fundamental Concepts in the Use of Antibiotics. Case. Case. TM is a 24 year old male admitted to ICU after TBI and leg fracture from MVA ICU day 3

GROUP 4: ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING FOR SELECETED SPECIES

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

EUCAST 2016/17 and what to do when there are no breakpoints and if the UK should exit EU

University Ss Cyril and Methodius in Skopje Faculty of veterinary medicine-skopje

SAMPLE VET08. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals.

Antimicrobials. Antimicrobials

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY CURRENT METHODS IN ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING

This document is protected by international copyright laws.

Leveraging the Lab and Microbiology Department to Optimize Stewardship

Transcription:

EUCAST Workshop: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with EUCAST breakpoints and methods Susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated fastidious organisms Luis Martinez-Martínez Service of Microbiology Univ. Hosp. Marqués de Valdecilla Dpt. Molecular Biology, Univ. Cantabria Santander, Spain Barcelona, 10 May 2014

FASTIDIOUS Bacteria and SUSCEPTIBILITY Testing Fastidious: lat. Fastidiosus (fastidium = Loathing) Organisms needing media supplemented with blood (or blood components) and possibly needing an atmosphere other than ambient air for satisfactory growth [ when performing susceptibility testing]

NOT TO BE CONSIDERED Fastidious & Frequent ( Traditionally well recognized bacteria): Streptococcus pneumoniae Streptococcus spp. other than S. pneumoniae Neisseria gonorrhoeae --N. meningitidis Haemophilus influenzae -- H. parainfluenzae Uncommon & Non-fastidious: Bacillus spp. [Aeromonas spp.] Plesiomonas shigelloides Vibrio spp.

FASTIDIOUS & UNCOMMON BACTERIA LIMITATIONS FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING Infections may respond well (Legionella spp., Bordetella spp.) to the usually recommended drugs of choice Little microbiological, clinical and pharmacological information. Special media required: Technical difficulties Breakpoints often based on interpretive criteria defined for other organisms (published literature and/or personal experience) [Some organisms ( i.e., Bacillus, Corynebacterium, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc) can represent environmental bacteria or normal microbiota]

Campylobacter coli, C. jejuni Corynebacterium jeikeium, C. urealyticum, C. striatum, C. amycolatum Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae Leuconostoc spp, Peidococcus spp. [Lactobacillus spp.] HACEK group Pasteurella spp. Moraxella catarrhalis Fquinolone/Macrolide Resistance Multiresistance Glycopeptide Resistance Clavulanate-Inhibited β-lactamase H. pylori Metronidazole/ Macrolide/Fquinolone Resistance

2010

Organism Abiotrophia, Granulicatella CLSI M45-A2 X EUCAST 2014 Corynebacterium spp./coryneform bacteria X [X] Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae Facultatively anaerobic Lactobacillus spp. Leuconostoc spp, Pediococcus spp. [Listeria monocytogenes] X X Campylobacter coli, C. jejuni X X Aggregibacter-Cardiobacterium-Eikenella- Kingella [ HACEK group] [Moraxella catarrhalis] X X Pasteurella spp. X X Helicobacter pylori X X Brucella spp. Francisella tularensis X X X X X X X

Organism COMMITTEE METHOD MEDIUM ATMOS. Tº TIME (h) Corynebacterium spp. Listeria monocytogenes METHODOLOGY EUCAST DD MH-F 5%CO 2 35±1 18±2 // (40-48) CLSI M45-A BMD CAMHB+LHB Ambient 35 [20]-24 (48) EUCAST DD MH-F 5%CO 2 35±1 18±2 CLSI M45-A BMD CAMHB+LHB Ambient 35 [20]-24 (48)

Organism COMMITTEE METHOD MEDIUM ATMOS. Tº TIME (h) C. coli, C. jejuni EUCAST DD MH-F A Microae. 41±1 24 // (40-48) CLSI M45-A2 DD BMD B MHA-5%SB CAMHB+LHB Microae. 36-37 // 42 48 // 24 M. catarrhalis EUCAST DD MH-F 5%CO 2 35±1 18±2 Pasteurella spp. A pre-dried plates CLSI M45-A2 DD BMD C MHA CAMHB 5%CO 2 Ambient 35 20-24 EUCAST DD MH-F 5%CO 2 35±1 18±2 CLSI M45-A2 B Agar dilution (animal isolates) DD D BMD C MHA-5%SB CAMHB+LHB Ambient 35 C Nitrocefin assay for β-lactamase: A positive result predicts resistance to Penicilin/Ampicillin-Amoxycillin, BUT A negative result does not implies susceptibility to these agents (other mechanisms!) D When 5% CO 2 is required for growth, test by BMD METHODOLOGY 16-18 18-24

Organism Helicobacter pylori A aged plates METHODOLOGY COMMITTEE METHOD MEDIUM ATMOS. Tº TIME (h) EUCAST MIC method Breakpoints based on ECOFFs CLSI M45 A2 Agar Diluton MHA-SB A Microae. 35±2 72

Organism COMMITTEE METHOD MEDIUM ATMOS. Tº TIME (h) Abiotrophia CLSI M45-A2 BMD CAMHB+LHB Granulicatella +pyridoxal Ambient 35 20-24 E. rhusiopathiae CLSI M45-A2 BMD CAMHB+LHB Ambient 35 20-24 Lactobacillus spp. CLSI M45-A2 BMD CAMHB+LHB 5%CO 2 35 24-48 Leuconostoc spp. Pediococcus spp. METHODOLOGY CLSI M45-A2 BMD CAMHB+LHB Ambient 35 20-24

METHODOLOGY Organism COMMITTEE METHOD MEDIUM ATMOS. Tº TIME (h) HACEK CLSI M45-A2 BMD CAMHB+LHB 5%CO 2 35 24-48 Brucella spp. CLSI M45-A2 BMD Brucella broth (adj. ph) [Ambient] 35(±2) 48 Francisella spp. CLSI M45-A2 BMD CAMHB+DGS Ambient 35(±2) 48 Yersinia pestis CLSI M45-A2 BMD CAMHB Ambient 35±2 24 (48)

BP-CORYNEBACTERIA EUCAST 2014 CLSI M45-A2 S R S (<=) R (>=) Penicillin 0,12 0,12 1 4 Cefepime, Cefotaxime Ceftriaxone 1 4 Imipenem 4 16 Meropenem 4 16 Vancomycin 2 2 2 - Daptomycin 1 - Gentamicin 1 1 4 16 Erythromycin 0.5 2 Clindamyicn 0.5 0.5 Ciprofloxacin 1 1 1 4 Moxifloxacin 0.5 0.5 Doxycycline 4 16 Tetracycline 2 2 4 16 Cotrimoxazole 2/38 4/76 Rifampin 0.06 0.5 1 4 Quinupristin-Dalf. 1 4 Linezolid 2 2 2 -

Gradient Diffusion Method for susceptibility testing of fastidious bacteria? An easy practical approach. Allows media supporting growth of the tested organism and different incubation conditions Limitation: Not standardized by EUCAST/ CLSI Results should be interpreted with caution A comment can be considered when preparing the clinical report

Other (unresolved) issues related to susceptibility testing of fastidious bacteria? Uncommon bacteria still to be considered by the CLSI (and EUCAST) Reliability (and usefulness) of data obtained with automated method or with a methodology different of the standardized one ((i.e. C. striatum etc.!) Intracellular bacteria Uncultivable bacteria

FINAL REMARKS Both CLSI and (to a lesser extent by the moment) EUCAST have defined technical conditions and evaluation criteria for susceptibility testing of fastidious & uncommon bacteria However, as for other organisms, different methods and breakpoints have been defined by both committees Multiple issues remain to be solved when considering susceptibility testing of fastidious organisms, and much more studies are needed before they can be reliably solved.