Phages. The Tbilisi phage (Vershilova and

Similar documents
Metabolic Characterization of Brucella Strains that

STUDIES ON BACTERIOPHAGE AND METABOLIC IDENTIFICATION OF BRUCELLA STRAINS *

Bovine Brucellosis Control of indirect ELISA kits

Antigens of Brucella abortus

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HUMAN BRUCELLOSIS IN

Resistance of Coagulase-Positive Staphylococci

Drd. OBADĂ MIHAI DORU. PhD THESIS ABSTRACT

and other serological tests in experimentally infected cattle

PROJECT FOR KEEPING LAYER Salient Features :- (i) The project report envisages reared each year.

Taxonomic Position in the Genus Brucella of the Causative Agent of Canine Abortion

B. suis and B. abortus and since completely satisfactory

Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals *** (To be filled up by the Nominee)

suis. The multiple amino acid media devised by these workers (KBD and MMHRB) contained cystine and methionine as organic sources of sulfur.

The Salmonella. Dr. Hala Al Daghisatni

Intracellular Production of Brucella L Forms

Recent Topics of Brucellosis

Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N. J.) All these cultures proved to be highly active against mycobacteria.

Radial Immunodiffusion Test with a Brucella Polysaccharide Antigen for Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Cattle

Federal Expert Select Agent Panel (FESAP) Deliberations

Brucellosis situation in Mongolia and Result of Bovine Brucellosis Proficiency Test

Curriculum Vitae. : AlBaha University, faculty of Science.

Salmonella. Serological. Salmonella. food poisoning. Use of pasteurized milk and milk products Improvement of hygiene. Proper storage of foods

SENSITIVE AND -RESISTANT TUBERCLE BACILLI IN LIQUID MEDIUM SENSITIVITY TESTS

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

Classification of the genus Brucella : the current position(*)

Ch. 7 BRUCELLOSIS REGULATIONS CHAPTER 7. BRUCELLOSIS REGULATIONS

UNCLASSIFIED AD ARMED SERVICES TECHNICAL INFORMATION AGENCY ARLINGTON HALL STATION ARLINGTON 12, VIRGINIA UNCLASSIFIED

Brucellosis in Ringed Seals and Harp Seals from Canada

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE

In Vitro Susceptibility of Brucella

Quad Plate User s Manual

A SEROLOGICAL INVESTIGATION ON ADULT CATTLE VACCINATED WITH BRUCELLA ABORTUS STRAIN 19

India s Trade Performance in Poultry Products

GROWTH IN THE LARVAE OF TENTHREDINIDAE

Surveillance of Brucella Antibodies in Camels of the Eastern Region of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Procedures for the Taking of Preventive and Eradication Measures of Brucellosis for Swine

Sudan Notes and Records

FINAL REPORT DESIGNING BEJAJO MALEM MAGAZINE AS TOURIST GUIDANCE TO PROMOTE NIGHT CULINARY PLACES IN PALEMBANG

Case Study Brucellosis: 2001 & Case Study Brucellosis: 2001 & Case Study Brucellosis: 2001 & Case Study Brucellosis: 2001 & 2002

VETERINARY BACTERIOLOGY FROM THE DARK AGES TO THE PRESENT DAY

Biological Threat Fact Sheets

Development and Characterization of Mouse Models of Infection with Aerosolized Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis

Hemolysis Test for Cattle Vaccinated and Infected with

The Report referred to in Article 5 of Directive 92/117/EEC

BRUCELLOSIS. Morning report 7/11/05 Andy Bomback

Outlines. Introduction Prevalence Resistance Clinical presentation Diagnosis Management Prevention Case presentation Achievements

Acquisition of antibiotic resistance by

Project Protocol Number UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE &USE COMMITTEE 2002 VERTEBRATE ANIMAL USE PROTOCOL FORM

A FAMILY OF SPOTTED Q. I. SIMPSON AND W. E. CASTLE1

University of Canberra. This thesis is available in print format from the University of Canberra Library.

Chapter 8 Livestock Board Import Rules Statement of Reasons

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

On farm risks associated with the prevalence of resistant strains of Escherichia coli: a pilot study

Overview of animal and human brucellosis in EU: a controlled disease?

Conservation of Butterflies in South Africa s SA Entomological Journal - Invertebrates. Vol. 1 Pages 8-12 Ramsgate September 2004

Testimony of the Natural Resources Defense Council on Senate Bill 785

Infecting Anopheles stephensi With Rodent Malaria Parasites Alida Coppi & Photini Sinnis

VALUE OF FLUORESCENCE POLARISATION ASSAY IN COMPARISON TO TRADITIONAL TECHNIQUES IN DIAGNOSIS OF PORCINE BRUCELLOSIS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Unit G5 - Veterinary Programmes

reviewed. One is associated with recovery from natural or experimental infection

Cercetări bacteriologice, epidemiologice şi serologice în bruceloza ovină ABSTRACT

Xochitl Morgan: The human microbiome; the role of commensals in health and disease.

Growth Performance and Mortality in Hybrid Converter Turkeys Reared at High Altitude Region

Seroprevalence of human brucellosis in Erbil city

SERVICE ANIMALS. I. Policy Section Risk Management. Policy Subsection Service Animals. Policy Statement

Diagnosis of human brucellosis caused by Brucella canis

A collaborative effortan investigation of suspect canine brucellosis

Ampicillin in the treatment of brucellosis

Veterinary Science Preparatory Training for the Veterinary Assistant. Floron C. Faries, Jr., DVM, MS

Comparative Evaluation of Microagglutination Test and Serum Agglutination Test as Supplementary Diagnostic Methods for Brucellosis

Media Issued by: LABORATORY MANAGER Original Date: April 11, 2001 Approved by: Laboratory Director Revision Date: February 27, 2004

Bovine Mastitis Products for Microbiological Analysis

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Gye and Cramer (1919) found that the ionizable salts of calcium injected together with the washed spores of Cl. tetani or of certain

Ayurlog: National Journal of Research in Ayurved Science. Review on description of Seasons in Charakasamhita

NOTES IMMUNOGENICITY IN MONKEYS OF A COMBINED TOXOID FROM THE MAIN TOXIC PRINCIPLES SEPARATED FROM HABU SNAKE VENOM

Sera from 2,500 animals from three different groups were analysed:

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

2012 Work Programme of the

Surveillance of animal brucellosis

Brucellosis surveillance and control in Zimbabwe: bacteriological and serologies~ investigation in dairy herds

GENTAMICIN: ACTIVITY IN VITRO AGAINST GRAMNEGATIVE ORGANISMS AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCES IN THE TREATMENT OF URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS

FELINE CORONAVIRUS (FCoV) [FIP] ANTIBODY TEST KIT

The Use of Homologous Antigen in the Serological Diagnosis of Brucellosis Caused by Brucella melitensis

ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS: TRIAL IN LATIN AMERICA

Brucellosis of Cattle' (Bang's Disease)

ANTIMICROBIAL TESTING. with ALKA VITA (ALKAHYDROXY ) ESCHERICHIA COLI STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS (MRSA) PSEUDOMONA AERUGINOSA ENTEROBACTER CLOACAE

Wildlife/Livestock Disease Investigations Team (WiLDIT) Brucellosis Research Update

The Effect of Enzyme Treatments on Brucella abortus Cell Walls

The Menace of Typhoid / Paratyphoid Fever The Abuja Experience: A 5 Year Retrospective Study

THE EFFECT OF INADEQUATE RATIONS ON THE PRODUCTION AND HATCHABILITY OF EGGS

Board of Directors Meeting Thursday, May 14th, 2018

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS INTRODUCTION TO VETERINARY TECHNOLOGY

CHALLENGE SET EXERCISE FALL 2008

Applied Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology: Identification of aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria

of Staphylococcus aureus

370 LOOMIS, The Galapagos Albatross.

BROOD REDUCTION IN THE CURVE-BILLED THRASHER By ROBERTE.RICKLEFS

Resistance to cloxacillin among hospital staphylococci.

Staphylococcus aureus

Transcription:

DIFFERENTIATION OF BRUCELLAE BY THE AID OF PHAGES J6ZEF PARNAS Department of Microbiology, Academy of Medicine, Lublin, Poland ABSTRACT PARNAS, J6ZEF (Academy of Medicine, Lublin, Poland). Differentiation of brucellae by the aid of phages. J. Bacteriol. 82:319-325. 1961.-There appears to be no absolute specificity of phages for the three species of the genus Brucella. The phage test is only supplementary to biochemical and serological methods for species differentiation. Pickett and Nelson (1950) were the first to examine brucellaphage. Drozewkina, Uralewa, and Czerczenkowa (1955) made fundamental examinations of brucellaphages that they isolated. Others (Mamacaszwili, 1958; Vershilova and Ostrowskaja, 1956; Dubrovskaia, Ostrovskaia, and Glubdzina, 1958) also made important observations on brucellaphage. In 1956 I obtained from the Institute of Gamaleja the "Tbilisi" phage which, according to Vershilova and Ostrowskaja (1956), lysed cultures of Brucella abortus but not Brucella suis or Brucella melitensis. This was an important observation and use of the standard World Health Organization strains (B. melitensis strain 16M, B. suis strain 1330, and B. abortus strain 544) confirmed the action of "Tbilisi" phage (Parnas, 1957). Accordingly, at the request of the World Health Organization, the Tbilisi phage was sent to Stableforth at the Central Veterinary Laboratory (Weybridge, England), van Drimmelen at the University of Pretoria, Stinebring and Braun at Rutgers University, and Jones at the University of Wisconsin. Data from these laboratories (Brinley-Morgan, Kay, and Bradley, 1960; Stinebring and Braun, 1959; van Drimmelen, 1959; Jones, 1960) are in general accord with the observations on Tbilisi phage; that is, this brucellaphage selectively lysed B. abortus and is useful in differentiating B. abortus from B. melitensis and B. suis. However, Brinley-Morgan et al. (1960) isolated from cattle in England 40 strains of Brucella which were B. melitensis Received for publication December 2, 1960 319 when tested by the methods of Huddleson (1943) and Wilson and Miles (1932), yet they were lysed by Tbilisi phage. This observation was also made by Jones (1960). The purpose of the present paper is to present data on examinations made from 1957 to 1960 of 44 brucellaphages on over 329 cultures of brucellae from my own collection. After examination of such a large number of brucellae, the initial optimism concerning the possibility of the use of phages to differentiate the species of the genus Brucella appears not to be entirely justified. Brucellaphage is useful in differentiating the brucellae, but only as a supplement for the methods of Huddleson (1943) and Wilson and Miles (1932), not as the sole determinative test. MATERIALS AND METHODS Phages. The Tbilisi phage (Vershilova and Ostrowskaja, 1956), phages P, Mp1p, and 2XIt (Drozewkina et al., 1955), and 34 other phages were isolated in my laboratory. (I omit data in this communication on other phages isolated by me.) Brucella cultures. Nearly 329 cultures from my collection and from foreign culture collections were used. The cultures were in the smooth phase when tested against the phages. All 329 strains were subjected to virulent phages. Not all strains were used in the tests on the activity of individual phages, and the differeniees are explained by the numbers enclosed in the text and in the tables. Isolation of brucellaphages. Phages were isolated from stock cultures 6 months old or older and, in five cases, from manure gathered from farms on which there were Brucella-infected animals. To these materials was added liver broth at ph 7.0 to 7.2 in the proportion of 1:10. This was kept in an incubator at 37 C for 10 days. The ph was adjusted to 7.0 to 7.2 and the broth then filtered, first through a Berkefeld (57 mm) filter and then through a Chamberland (160 mm)

320 PARNAS [VOL. 82 filter. The filtrate was examined for the presence of brucellaphage by placing some filtrate on the surface of medium containing 1.4% agar after the surface had been seeded with a culture of Brucella. World Health Organization standard strains used were: melitensis 16M, suis 1330, bovis 544, and other indicated strains, with slight sensitivity to phage activity. The phages were also titrated in this manner. In this way one phage from manure and 33 phages from old cultures were isolated. The phages were propagated on the indicated Brucella cultures in liver broth at ph 7.2. The phages were preserved by freezing at -20 C, and diluted 10-3 to 10-9 for determination of activity on various cultures of brucellae. RESULTS The Tbilisi phage lysed the standard B. abortus strain 544, but not B. melitensis strain 16M and B. suis strain 1330 (Table 1). The use of Tbilisi phage for the examination of 236 cultures of brucellae showed that the specificity of the phage for B. abortus was not absolute because only 101 TABLE 1. Action of Russian phages on Brucella cultures Lysis of standard strains No. of cultures lysed/no. examined Phage Phage source B. mel- B. abortus B. melitensis B. suir B.a- B. el- B. bortus den- ss 544 16M 1330 Typical AtYi- Typi- AtYja- Typical AtYyi- Tbilisi Vershilova, and Ostrow- - - 101/164 9/23 6/13 4/4 14/22 3/10 skaja, 1956 P 89/130 14/27 2/14 2/9 22/46 4/18 Mt Drozewkina et al., 1955 - - 87/130 12/27 2/14 2/9 24/46 0/18 Mp 5/130 3/30 0/14 0/9 0/43 0/18 TABLE 2. Examination of Brucella strains with 14 phages isolated in Poland, 1957-58 No. of cultures lysed/no. examined Phage no. Phage source B. abortus B. melitensis B. suis Typical Atypical Typical Atypical Typical Atypical I1* Bovis typical 103/121 8/9 3/3 4/4 13/20 9/11 II Bovis typical 28/121 7/9 2/3 4/4 13/20 8/11 IX Mixture of strains 84/121 8/9 3/3 1/4 11/20 8/11 VIIa Mixture of strains 102/121 8/9 3/3 2/4 16/20 8/11 VI/10 Mixture of strains 102/121 7/9 1/3 2/4 16/20 6/11 XIVa Mixture of strains 81/121 7/9 0/3 2/4 11/20 5/11 VIlla Mixture of strains 94/121 6/9 0/3 3/5 12/20 7/11 XVI Mixture of strains 97/121 7/9 0/3 2/3 13/20 7/11 VII Mixture of strains 90/121 7/9 3/3 1/4 13/20 8/11 VIII Mixture of strains 96/121 8/9 3/3 3/4 16/20 7/11 XIa Bovis typical 101/121 8/9 0/3 3/4 16/20 9/11 IV/10 Mixture of strains 95/121 8/9 0/3 3/4 16/20 8/11 XI Mixture of strains 98/121 8/9 1/3 2/4 16/20 9/11 XIV Mixture of strains 109/121 8/9 0/3 3/4 18/20 11/11 * Each Roman numeral corresponds to a group of ten muzeal strains-determined as "mixture strains." Each means that in a group of ten strains there were different variants: bovis, melitensis, and suis typical and atypical.

1961] PHAGE DIFFERENTIATION OF BRUCELLAE 321 of 164 cultures of B. abortus were lysed. Thirtytwo strains of B. suis and 17 of B. melitensis were not lysed. Parnas (1958) reported that atypical Brucella strains behaved differently with Tbilisi phage. The data from the examination of phages P, Mt, and Mp on 250 strains of brucellae are given (Table 1). Table 2 shows the results of the examination of Brucella strains collected from 1957 to 1958 with 14 phages isolated from typical and atypical strains of Brucella bovis and B. suis. In 1959, I isolated 17 phages from old Brucella cultures (strains bovis and suis), and these were tested on standard strains of brucellae (Table 3). In addition, ten phages were tested on 205 brucellae strains (Table 4). Table 5 gives data on three phages isolated. When these were tested on the standard cultures, the phages acted like the Tbilisi phage, and, when tested on a great number of other brucellae, they were found to lyse some strains of species other than B. abortus. But the greatest percentage of cultures lysed with B. abortus. The photographs presented here illustrate some problems. In Fig. 1 the action of three phages (10/I, 24/II, and 212/XV) is visible on typical strains of B. bovis. Figure 2 illustrates the action of phages 212/XV and 24/II on typical strains of B. bovis. Phage 24/II in the titer 10-3 is especially strong. In the last sector (E) on the right in Fig. 2 there is complete stoppage of growth. Figures 3 and 4 show the action of phages 24/II and 212/XV on the standard strains, B. melitensis 16M, B. bovis 544, and B. suis 1330. Only the bovis strain shows sensitivity in the presence of the phages. On this basis, we can confirm that both phages are able to differentiate Brucella types. But this is an illusion only. When a greater number of strains Examination of Brucella strains with 17 phages isolated in Poland TABLE 3. Phage no. S 4/I 7/I 18/Il 21/II 92/VII 99/VIII 100/VIII 106/VIII 112/IX 116/IX 187/XIV 202/XV 205/XV 219/XVI 220/XVI 222/VIII Phage source manure * s.a. m.t. s.t. s.t. b.a. b.a. R. abortus 544 Lysis of standard strains B. melitensi.s 16M B. suis 1330 B. abortus 19 * = bovis typical, b.a. = bovis atypical, s.t. = suis typical, s.a. = suis atypical, m.t. = melitensis typical. TABLE 4. Examination of ten of my own phages on 205 Brucella strains Phage no. Source of No. of cultures lysed/no. examined phage Bovis Melitensis Suis Bovis Melitensis Stuis typical typical typical atypical atypical atypical 7/I * 97/205 4/205 10/205 10/205 1/205 3/205 18/II 77/205 4/205 7/205 8/205 1/205 5/205 21/II 109/205 2/205 13/205 8/205 1/205 1/205 112/VIII 62/205 2/205 2/205 5/205 1/205 2/205 187/VIII 7/205 0/205 0/205 0/205 0/205 0/205 202/XIV 76/205 1/205 5/205 7/205 1/205 1/205 205/XV s.t. 20/205 3/205 3/205 3/205 0/205 0/205 219/XVI b.a. 70/205 1/205 5/205 8/205 0/205 5/205 222/XVI b.a. 89/205 1/205 24/205 11/205 1/205 5/205 S manure 58/205 2/205 1/205 4/205 1/205 4/205 * = bovis typical, s.t. = suis typical, b.a. = bovis atypical.

322 PARNAS [VOL. 82 TABLE 5. Examination of Brucella strains with three phages isolated in Poland Lysis of standard strains No. of cultures lysed/no. examined Phage no. source B. abor- B. mel- B. B. abortus B. melilensis B. suis tus itensis suis 544 16'M 1330 Typical Atypical Typical Atypical Typical Atypical 10/I _ - 100/162 11/28 5/28 2/10 20/59 5/23 24/II _ 97/162 14/28 5/28 2/10 15/59 2/23 212/XV s.t. 0-- 18/162 10/28 4/28 1/10 17/59 6/23 * = bovis typical, s.t. = typical. FIG. 1. Six strains of Brucella bovis treated with brucellaphages 10/1 (sectors A), 24/II (sectors B), and 212/XV (sectors C). is examined, the sensitivity is variable and has no regularity. CONCLUSIONS In old cultures of brucellae, we frequently found phages. Certain phages showed lytic activity for Brucella abortus and these same phages often would not lyse Brucella melitensis or Brucella sutis. The brucellae that are atypical for a species behaved somewhat differently than did typical cultures. The Tbilisi phage of Vershilova lysed most but not all B. abortus strains and no B. suis or B. melitensis. Phages P and AMt of Drozewkina lysed some typical and atypical strains of B. abortus, B. suis, and B. melitensis, whereas phage Mp lysed a few B. abortus and atypical B. abortus. In this

.S....i t FIG. 2. Five strains of Brucella bovis infected with brucellaphages 212/IV (sectors A, B, and C) and 24/II (sectors D and E). FIG. 3. Action of brucellaphage 24/lI on Brucella suis strain 1330 (upper three areas of growth), Brucella bovis strain 544 (middle three areas of growth), and Brucella melitensis strain M16 (lower three areas of growth. 323

324 PARNAS [VOL..82 FIG. 4. Action of brucellaphabe 212/XV on Brucella suis strain 1330 (upper three areas of growth), Brucella bovis strain 544 (middle three areas of growth), and Brucella melitensis strain M16 (lower three areas of growth). respect phages P and Mt are polyvalent but phage Mp is monovalent. My own phages, 10/I, 24/1I, and 212/XV, appeared to be specific for B. abortus when tested on the standard strains, but were polyvalent when tested on a large number of typical and atypical strains of the three Brucella species. In conclusion, there appears to be no absolute specificity of phage to species. The phage test is useful as a supplementary test to the biochemical and serological methods (Huddleson, 1943; Wilson and Miles, 1932) of species differentiation. Examination by phage of more brucellae strains from all parts of the world is necessary. LITERATURE CITED BRINLEY-MORGAN, W. J., D. KAY, AND D. E. BRADLEY. 1960. Brucella bacteriophage. Nature 188:74-75. DROZEWKINA, M. S., W. S. URALEWA, AND N. A. CZERCZENKOWA. 1955. Opyt promienienija bruceloznowo bakteriofaga dlja idientifikacji hemokultur, wydielennych ot bolnoj bruciellozomljudiej. Trudy Rost. Gosud. Naucz. Islied. Prot. Inst., IX:133-140. DUBROVSKATA, I. I., N. N. OSTROVSKAIA, AND A. I. GLUBOKINA. 1958. Izmenenie khimicheskogo sostava brutesell pod viliianiem faga. Biokhimiya 23: 523-536. HUDDLESON, B. F. 1943. Brucellosis in man and animals, p. 23. Commonwealth Fund, New York. JONES, L. M. 1960. Comparison of phage typing with standard methods of species differentiation in brucellae. Bull. World Health Organization 23:130. MAMACASZWILI, E. G. 1958. Brucelloznyj bakteriofag. Med. Zurn. Uzbechistana. 1:28. PARNAS, J. 1957. La diff6renciation des vari6tes de brucella A l'aide du phage. Bull. World Health Organization/Bruc/177, Lima, Peru. PARNAS, J. 1958. Nouvelles recherches sur la variabilit6 des Brucella. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis 35:179. PICKETT, M. J., AND E. L. NELSON. 1950. Brucella bacteriophage. J. Hyg. 48: 500-503.

19611 PHAGE DIFFERENTIATION OF BRUCELLAE 325 STINEBRING, W. R., AND W. BRAUN. 1959. Brucella phage. J. Bacteriol. 78:736-737. VAN DRIMMELEN, G. C. 1959. Bacteriophage typing applied to strains of Brucella organism. Nature 184 (suppl. 14):1079. VERSHILOVA, P. A., AND N. N. OSTROWSKAJA. 1956. Personal communication. Moscou. WILSON, G. S., AND A. A. MILES. 1932. The serological differentiation of smooth strains of the Brucella group. Brit. J. Exptl. Pathol. 13:1.