STAT170 Exam Preparation Workshop Semester

Similar documents
Section: 101 (2pm-3pm) 102 (3pm-4pm)

Pete s Eats Alan s Diner Sarah s Snackbar Total Dissatisfied Satisfied Total

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia.

Section A. Answer all questions. Answer each question in the space provided for that question. Use 90 and Over on page 2 of the Data Sheet.

September Population analysis of the Akita breed

September Population analysis of the Beagle breed

September Population analysis of the Whippet breed

September Population analysis of the Schnauzer breed

September Population analysis of the Bearded Collie breed

September Population analysis of the Fox Terrier (Wire) breed

September Population analysis of the Giant Schnauzer breed

September Population analysis of the French Bulldog breed

September Population analysis of the Miniature Schnauzer breed

September Population analysis of the Rhodesian Ridgeback breed

September Population analysis of the Norwegian Buhund breed

September Population analysis of the Australian Shepherd breed

September Population analysis of the Boxer breed

September Population analysis of the Great Dane breed

September Population analysis of the Mastiff breed

September Population analysis of the Maltese breed

September Population analysis of the Anatolian Shepherd Dog breed

September Population analysis of the Neapolitan Mastiff breed

September Population analysis of the Old English Sheepdog breed

September Population analysis of the Airedale Terrier breed

September Population analysis of the Spaniel (English Springer) breed

September Population analysis of the Poodle (Standard) breed

September Population analysis of the Soft-Coated Wheaten Terrier breed

September Population analysis of the Cairn Terrier breed

September Population analysis of the Shih Tzu breed

September Population analysis of the Irish Wolfhound breed

September Population analysis of the Glen of Imaal Terrier breed

September Population analysis of the Dalmatian breed

September Population analysis of the Borzoi breed

September Population analysis of the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel breed

Exit Ticket 89 Chapter 6 Quiz Review. 1. Three classes took the same test. Here is a box-and-whisker plot showing each class s scores.

Supplement of Changes in soil carbon and nutrients following 6 years of litter removal and addition in a tropical semi-evergreen rain forest

Phenotypic and Genetic Variation in Rapid Cycling Brassica Parts III & IV

SCIENTIFIC REPORT. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in turkey flocks, in the EU,

Adjustment Factors in NSIP 1

Relationship Between Eye Color and Success in Anatomy. Sam Holladay IB Math Studies Mr. Saputo 4/3/15

Dominance/Suppression Competitive Relationships in Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Plantations

Rosenberger et al.: Capercaillie eggshell pigmentation, maculation and thickness

Lab 7. Evolution Lab. Name: General Introduction:

WisGraph 8.0 Interpretive Manual

STATISTICAL REPORT. Preliminary Analysis of the Second Collaborative Study of the Hard Surface Carrier Test

Variation in Piglet Weights: Development of Within-Litter Variation Over a 5-Week Lactation and Effect of Farrowing Crate Design

Biol 160: Lab 7. Modeling Evolution

Building Rapid Interventions to reduce antimicrobial resistance and overprescribing of antibiotics (BRIT)

Australian and New Zealand College of Veterinary Scientists. Membership Examination. Veterinary Epidemiology Paper 1

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Abstract

Answers to Questions about Smarter Balanced 2017 Test Results. March 27, 2018

Multiclass and Multi-label Classification

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia.

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia.

Predictors of the Diagnosis and Antibiotic Prescribing to Patients Presenting with Acute Respiratory Infections

Subdomain Entry Vocabulary Modules Evaluation

Comparative Evaluation of Online and Paper & Pencil Forms for the Iowa Assessments ITP Research Series

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROWTH OF SUFFOLK RAMS ON CENTRAL PERFORMANCE TEST AND GROWTH OF THEIR PROGENY

Genotypic and phenotypic relationships between gain, feed efficiency and backfat probe in swine

WisGraph 7.0 Interpretive Manual

Supporting Information

Spatial distribution and larval biology of Spirobranchus giganteus

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia.

Student Exploration: Rainfall and Bird Beaks

Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Site and Epidemiologic Classification, United States, 2005a. Copyright restrictions may apply.

Supplementary Fig. 1: Comparison of chase parameters for focal pack (a-f, n=1119) and for 4 dogs from 3 other packs (g-m, n=107).

Types of Data. Bar Chart or Histogram?

Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. Vol. 23, No. 5 : May

PARADE COLLEGE Mathematics Methods 3&4-CAS Probability Analysis SAC 2

17 th Club Phase 1 Annual Meeting April 5, Pierre Maison-Blanche Hopital Bichat, Paris, France

Objectives. Materials TI-73 CBL 2. Strainer. Gravel

Analysis of Veterinary Workforce in Thailand National Veterinary Education sub committee Gr.1

An alternative method for estimating bycatch from the U.S. shrimp trawl fishery in the Gulf of Mexico,

The Force Concept Inventory (FCI) is currently

Supporting Online Material for

Relationship between hatchling length and weight on later productive performance in broilers

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG WEIGHTS AND CALVING PERFORMANCE OF HEIFERS IN A HERD OF UNSELECTED CATTLE

The relation of body score (body height/body length) and haplotype E on Phu Quoc Ridgeback dogs (Canis familiaris)

Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) are breeding earlier at Creamer s Field Migratory Waterfowl Refuge, Fairbanks, AK

GENETIC DRIFT Carol Beuchat PhD ( 2013)

Supplementary material to Forecasting with the Standardized Self-Perturbed Kalman Filter

A Few Economic and Management Considerations for Dairy Heifers

[ 144 ] THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF MICE IN THREE CLIMATIC ENVIRONMENTS

Level 3 Statistics and Modelling, 2009

2013 Holiday Lectures on Science Medicine in the Genomic Era

ESTIMATING NEST SUCCESS: WHEN MAYFIELD WINS DOUGLAS H. JOHNSON AND TERRY L. SHAFFER

Antibiotic Use and Childhood Body Mass Index Trajectories

Kennelbuild Bespoke & Modular Kennel & Cattery Systems

Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes

Faculty of Biomedical & Life Sciences

Lakeland Terrier Pedigree Breed Health Survey

Naked Bunny Evolution

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PERFORMANCE TRAITS, INDIVIDUAL EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES AND SALE PRICES OF CENTRALLY TESTED BULLS

Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis

Golden Retriever Pedigree Breed Health Survey

EVOLUTION IN ACTION: GRAPHING AND STATISTICS

Evolution in Action: Graphing and Statistics

Econometric Analysis Dr. Sobel

Level 2 Mathematics and Statistics, 2017

Selection for Egg Mass in the Domestic Fowl. 1. Response to Selection

Transcription:

Study Information STAT Exam Preparation Workshop Semester Our sample is a randomly selected group of American adults. They were measured on a number of physical characteristics (some measurements were not recorded for some of the participants) and the data was coded. The variables collected are listed below. Sex Height Wingspan Forearm Hand Forearmhand Weight BMI Sex of respondent: = Male, = Female Height measured in cm Wingspan measured in cm Forearm length measured in cm Hand length measured in cm Forearm plus hand length measured in cm Weight measured in kg BMI: = underweight = normal = overweight = obese Question a) Which of the variables above are nominal, ordinal and numerical? b) Indicate a graphical display which could be constructed from the variables listed for the following scenarios: i. Compare the heights of males and females ii. Determine whether BMI is associated with sex iii. Examine the relationship between the height and wingspan of an individual Question (c) The following data shows the ages of some of the respondents to the survey above. Use the data to answer the following questions: 7 7 9 6 i. What is the mean and the standard deviation of this data set? ii. What is the median? iii. What are the upper and lower quartiles? iv. Are there any outliers? v. Sketch a boxplot based on this data.

Question The heights of adult American males are believed to follow a normal distribution with a mean of 7.8 cm and a standard deviation of.9 cm. a) What is the probability of finding an adult American male with a height of 7cm or more? b) In a group of adult males how many would you expect to have a height of less than 68 cm? c) A random sample of adults is selected. What is the probability that their average height is less than 7 cm? d) What is the probability that a group of males lying head to feet will end up forming a line more than metres long? Question Is the mean ratio of human forearm plus hand length to forearm length.68? The ratio of the human forearm plus hand length to their forearm length is believed to be.68. Our random sample of adults Americans had their forearm plus hand and forearm measurements taken, the ratio was then calculated for each adult and these ratios were found to have a mean ratio of.7 with a standard deviation of.6. Histogram of Forearm+ hand to forearm ratio 6.6.67.7.7.7.77 Forearm+ hand to forearm ratio.8.8 a) Use the information given to construct and interpret a 9% confidence interval for the true mean ratio of forearm plus hand length to forearm length. b) Using the confidence interval you have just constructed, write a conclusion to the research question above.

Question Is there a difference between the wingspan and the height of an adult? N Mean StDev SE Mean wingspan (cm) 7..9.8 height (cm) 68.8 9..88 Difference.6.6.8 Boxplot of wingspan (cm), height (cm) Data wing span (cm) heig ht (cm) Histogram of height (cm) 7 Histogram of wingspan (cm) 8 Histogram of Differences (with Ho and 9% t-confidence interval for the mean) 6 7 6 _ X height (cm) wingspan (cm) - -. -. Ho... Differences 7... In Da Vinci s analysis of the human body we are told that the wingspan (fingertip to fingertip with arms outstretched horizontally) of a human being is the same as their height. For our sample of American adults we measured their wingspan and their heights and obtained the following summaries. Use the summaries above with an appropriate hypothesis test to determine whether or not there is a difference in the wingspan and height of an adult. Hypothesis test

Question Is there an association between sex and BMI rating? A sample of adult Americans also had their weights recorded and their BMIs calculated. Of the 7 men in the sample had low to normal BMIs and the rest were considered either overweight or obese according to the BMI index. Of the females sampled 9 had low to normal BMIs and the rest were overweight or obese according to the BMI index. Use the information above and any other calculations necessary to carry out an appropriate hypothesis test to answer the research question. Hypothesis test Question 6 It is believed that 7% of American adults are either overweight or obese. Using the information in the previous question, answer the following questions. a) Estimate the proportion of American adults who are either overweight or obese? b) Do an appropriate hypothesis test to answer the research question above. Hypothesis test Are 7% of American adults either overweight or obese?

Question 7 Is there a difference between the forearm lengths of adult males and the forearm lengths of adult females? The output below shows a comparison between the forearm lengths of males in our sample and the forearm lengths of females in our sample. Use the output to answer the research question above. You may assume normality and equal variances for the forearm lengths of adult males and females. Two-sample T for forearm sex N Mean StDev SE Mean 6.7....88.6 Difference = µ () - µ () Estimate for difference:.7 9% CI for difference: (.6,.7) T-Test of difference = (vs ): T-Value = * P-Value = * DF = * Both use Pooled StDev =.8 Hypothesis Test

Which measurements are useful predictors of an adult s wingspan? Question 8 We will examine the relationships between the wingspan of an adult and the length of their forearms, the length of their hands and their heights. All measurements are in centimetres. Scatterplot of wingspan (cm) vs forearm H istogram (response is wingspan (cm)) 6 wingspan (cm) 6 7 8 - - forearm Residual Scatterplot of forearm versus wingspan histogram of residuals residuals versus fitted values Regression Analysis: wingspan (cm) versus forearm Model Summary S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 7.9 7.9%.% 6.% Coefficients Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value Constant.6 6.9.88.9 forearm.68... Regression Equation wingspan (cm) =.6 +.68 forearm The output above relates to the relation between forearm length and wingspan. Does the person with the smallest forearm also have the smallest wingspan? What is the approximate wingspan of the person with the shortest forearm? Comment on the appropriateness of using the length of a person s forearm to predict their wingspan. Your comments must include references the model assumptions and the relevant plots above.

Question 8 continued Regression Analysis: wingspan (cm) versus hand Model Summary S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred).6 7.69% 7.9% 7.99% Coefficients Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value Constant.8..97.7 hand 6.76.8 8.. Regression Equation wingspan (cm) =.8 + 6.76 hand Scatterplot of wingspan (cm) vs hand wingspan (cm) 6 7 8 hand 9 The output above represents the relation between the hand length of adults and their wingspan. Draw the fitted line on the scatter plot above. The adult with the largest residual has a hand length of 7 cm and a wingspan of 9. cm. Calculate the residual. Construct and interpret a 9% confidence interval for the population slope for the relation between hand length and wingspan. You may assume that the assumption checks are reasonable. Interpret the goodness of fit statistic from the regression model for the relationship hand length and wingspan.

Question 8 continued Regression Analysis: wingspan (cm) versus height (cm) Model Summary S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred).997 8.% 8.% 8.% Coefficients Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value Constant -8..8 -..99 height (cm).77.9 * * Regression Equation wingspan (cm) = -8. +.77 height (cm) Fitted Line Plot wingspan (cm) = - 8. +.7 height (cm) S.997 R- Sq 8.% R- Sq(adj) 8.% wingspan (cm) height (cm) The output above represents the relation between the height of adults and their wingspan. For American adults is their height a useful predictor for their wingspan? Conduct an appropriate hypothesis test. Hypothesis Test What is the correlation coefficient? What does it measure? The sum of the residuals must be zero. What is the other requirement on the residuals when finding the Least Squares Regression line? Where possible, use the regression output given and the analyses you have made to make the following predictions. If not possible explain why not: i. Mary has a hand of length cm, what do we expect her wingspan to be? ii. Chris has a wingspan of 8 cm, what do we expect his forearm length to be? iii. Jane is 6 cm tall, what do we expect her wingspan to be? Which is the better predictor of wingspan, the length of an adult s forearm, the length of their hand or their height?