83 DAFTAR PUSTAKA Agromedia. 2007. Sukses Beternak Puyuh. Jakarta: AgroMedia Pustaka. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis of the AOAC. Virginia: Inc. Arlington Asem E, Marrone BL, Hartelendy F. 1985. Steriodegenesis in ovarian cells of the japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). J Gen Comp Endocrinol 60(3): 353-360. Baksi SN, Kenny AD. 1981. Vitamin D metabolism in aged japanese quail: dietary calcium and estrogen effects. J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 241: 275-280. Balthazart, Jacques, Ball, Gregory F. 1998. Japanese quail as a model system for the investigation of steroid-cathecolamine interaction mediating appetitive and consumatory aspects of male sexual behaviour. Ann Rev: Sex Research. Barnette A. 2009. About japanese quail. http://lancester.unl.edu/4h/embryology (30 Juni 2009). Blaszczyk B, Tarasewic Z, Udala J, Gaczarzewizc D, Stankiewicz T. 2006. changes in the blood plasma testosterone and cholesterol concentrations during sexual maturation of pharaoh quail. Sci Am 24: 259 266. Cao J, Liu Z, Wang D, Xie D, Jia L, Chen Y. 2008. Green and blue monochromatic light promote growth and development of broilers via stimulating testosterone secretion and myofiber growth. J Appl Poult Res 17: 211-218. Cheeke PR. 2005. Applied Animal Nutrition Feed and Feedings. Ed ke-3. Harlow UK: Prentice Hall. Ciccone NA, Dunn IC, Boswell T, Tsutsuni K, UbukaT, Ukena K, Sharp PJ. 2004. Gonadotrophin inhibitory hormone depresses gonadotrophin α and follicle stimulating hormone β subunit expression in the pituitary of domestic chicken. J Neuroendocrinology 16: 999-1006. Dacke CG. 2000. The Paratiroids, Calcitonin, and Vitamin D. In GC Whittow. Sturkie s Avian Physiology. Ed ke-5. New York: Academic Press. Dalton MN. 2000. Effect of dietary fats on reproductive performance, egg quality. Fatty acid, composition of tissue and yolk and prostaglandin levels of embryonic tissues in japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) (Thesis). Blacksburg, Virginia: The Faculty of The Virginia Polytechnic and State University.
84 Dawson A, King MV, Bently GC, Ball GF. 2001. Photoperiodic control of seasonality in birds. J Bio Rhythms 16(4): 365-380. Denbow DM. 2000. Gastrointestinal Anatomy and Physiology. In GC Whittow. Sturkie s Avian Physiology. Ed ke-5. New York: Academic Press. Elert G. 2008. The nature of light. http://hypertexbook.com/physics/ (20 Pebruari 2008). Etches RJ. 1996. Reproduction in Poultry. Singapore: CAB International. Fairchild B. 2007. Lighting programs for backyard egg production. http://www.poultry.uga.edu/index.htm (30 Juni 2009). Foster RG, Grace MS, Provencio I, Degrip WJ, Jose M, Fernandez G. 1994. Identification of vertebrate deep brain photoreceptors. Neurosci and Biobehav Rev 18(4): 541-546. Foster RG, Soni BG.1998. Extraretinal photoreceptor and their regulation of temporal physiology. J Repro and Fert 3: 145-150. Furuse M, Muari A, Kita K, Okamamura. 1994. Lipogenesis depending on sexual maturation in female japanese quail. Comp Biochem and Physiol 100: 343-345. Gewehr CE, Cotta JT, Oliviera AIG, de Freitas HJ. 2005. Effect of lighting programs on the egg production of quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Agrotecnologia 29(4): 139-146. Gunes H, Cerit H. 2000. Interrelationships between age of sexual maturity, body weight and egg production in the japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Poult Sci 67: 463-469. Gunturkun O. 2000. Sensory Physiology: Vision. In G C Whittow. Sturkie s Avian Physiology. Ed ke-5. New York: Academic Press. Hafez ESE, Hafez B. 2000. Reproductin in Farm Animals. Edisi ke-7. Baltimore- Philadephia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Hart NS, Partrigde JC, Cuthill IC. 1999. Visual pigments, cone oil droplets, ocular media and predicted spectral sensitivity in the domestic turkey (Melleagris gallapavo). Vision Research 39(20): 3321-3328. http://chickscope.beckman.uiuc.edu/. 1998. Formation and part of the egg. (20 Pebruari 2008)
85 Ieda T, Takahashi T, Saito N, Yosuoka T, Kawashima M, Shimada K. 2000. Changes in parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptor binding in the shell gland of lying hens (Gallus domesticus) during oviposition Cycle. Gen and Comp Endocrinol. Johnson AL. 2000. Reproduction in Female. In GC Whittow. Sturkie s Avian Physiology. Ed ke-5. New York: Academic Press. Kim SF. 2000. Coturnix quail: the nutrition and management of japanese (Coturnix) quail in the tropic. http://www.thatquailplace.com/coturnix/ (30 Juli 2009). King MW. 2008. Steroid hormone. www. miking.at.iupui.edu (20 Juni 2008). Klasing KC. 2006. Comparative Avian Nutrition. London: CAB International. Lewis P, Perry GC, Morris T, English J. 2001. Supplemetary dim light differentially influences sexual maturity, oviposistion time, and melatonin rhythms in pullets. Br Poult Sci 80: 1723-1728. Lewis P, Morris T. 2006. Poultry Lighting: The Theory and Practice. Hampshire UK: Northcot. Lewis P, Caston L, Leeson S. 2006. Green light during rearing does not significantly affect the performance of egg-type pullet in the lying phase. Br Poult Sci 78(1): 125-132. Linder CL. 1992. Biokima Nutrisi dan Metabolisme dengan Pemakain Secara Klinis. Alih Bahasa: Amwila AW. Jakarta: UI Press. Listiyowati E, Roospitasari K. 2007. Puyuh Tata Laksana Budi Daya Secara Komersial. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya. Mabayo RT, Furuse M, Muari A, Okamamura. 1994. Interaction between medium chain and long chain triacylglicerols in lipids and energy metabolims in growing chicks. Lipids 29: 139-144. Martoharsono S. 2006. Biokimia. Jilid 2. Yogyakarta: UGM Press. Mattjik AA, Sumertajaya IM. 2006. Perancangan Percobaan dengan Aplikasi SAS dan Minitab. Bogor: IPB Press. Maywood. 2005. Serotonin: the chemistry of well-being. http://pagead2.googlessyndication.com.pagead/ (2 April 2008). McCarthy MM. 2008. Estradiol and the developing brain. Physiol Rev 88: 91-134.
86 Meddle SL, Follet BK. 1997. Photoperiodically driven changes in fos expression within tuberal hypothalamus and median eminence of japanese quail. J Neurosci 17: 8909-8918 Mellor S. 2001. Lighting schedule for broilers. World Poult Sci 17 (1): 33-35. Menegristek. 2008. Budidaya burung puyuh (Coturnix coturnix japonica). http://www.ristek.go.id (15 Januari 2008). Morris TR. 1967. The Effect of light intensity on growing and laying pullets. World s Poult Sci 23: 245-252. Nalbandov AV. 1990. Fisiologi Reproduksi pada Mamalia dan Unggas. Jakarta: UI Press. Nassauw LV, Schrenens A, Harrison F, Callebaut M. 1996. Localization of EGC and TGF-β in the quail ovary. 6 th International Symposium on Avian Endokrinology. Onagbesan OM, Peddie MJ. 1988. Steroid secretion by ovarian cells of the japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). J Gen Comp Endocrinol 72(2): 272-281. Ormsbee HS, Fondacaro JD. 2004. Action of serotonin on gatrointestinal tract. Experimental Biology and Medicine 178: 248-250. Pageaux JF, Laugier C, Pacheco H. 1984. Developmnent of the oviduct in quail during sexual maturation in relation to plasma concentrations of oestradiol and progesterone. J Endocrinol 63: 167-173. Palmiter RD. 1972. Regulation of protein synthesis in chick oviduct: independent regulation of ovalbumin, conalbumin, ovomuciod and lysosyme induction. J Biol Chem 247: 6450-6461. Prayitno DS, Phillips CJ, Omed H. 2006. The effect color of lightting on behaviour and production of meat chickens. J Appl Poult Res 15: 110-116. Priel A. 2007. Broilers and layers respond differently to coloured light. World poult Sci 23(4): 17. Randall M, Bolla G. 2008. Raising Japanese Quail. Ed ke-2. New South Walles: PrimefactHome. http://www.publish.csiro.au/hid/22/pid/3451.htm/ (17 Maret 2008). Roodenboog H, Noord P, Oost G, Slagharen T. 2001. Sodium, green, blue, cool or warm white light. World Poult Sci 17(12): 128-134.
87 Saito N, Kinzler S, Koike TI. 1990. Arginine vasotocin and mesotocin levels in theca and granulosa layers of ovary during the oviposisition cycle in hen. Gen Comp Endocrinol 79: 54-63. Satterlee DG, Marin RH. 2004. Pubic spread development and first egg lay in japanese quail. Poult Sci 13: 207-212. Siopes TD, Wilson WO. 1980. Participation of the eyes in photosexual response of japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). J Biol Reproduct 23: 352-357. Siswantoro. 2007. Sistem reproduksi ayam betina. Web Laboratorium Unggas UGM. http://chickaholic.wordpress.com (5 Mei 2008). Squires EJ. 2003. Apllied Animal Endocrinology. Wallingford UK: CABI Publishing. Stear J. 2005. Circadian organization in japanese quail. Circadiana. http://circadiana.blogspot.com (5 Mei 2008). Suprijatna E, Atmomarsono U, Kartasudjana R. 2005. Ilmu Dasar Ternak Unggas. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya. Swenson MJ. 1984. Duke s physiology of domestic animal. Ed ke-10. London: Comstock Publishing Assosiation. Tamzil MH. 1995. Pengaruh pembatasan pakan terhadap umur masak kelamin itik lokal (Tesis). Bogor: Fakultas Peternakan, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Tanabee Y, Nakamura. 1980. Endocrine mechanism in chicken (Gallus domesticus), quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) and duck (Anas plathyrhynchos domestika). Biological Rythms in Birds. Japan Scientific Societies Press. Tsutsui K, Li D, Ukena K, Kikuchi M, Ishii S. 1998. Developmental changes in galanin receptors in quail oviduct and effect of ovarian sex steroids on galanin receptor induction. J Endocrinol 139(10): 4230-4236. Underwood H, Groos G. 1982. Vertebrate circadian rhythms: retinal and extraretinal photoperception. J Cell and Molec Life Sci 38(9): 1013-1021. Vali N. 2008. The japanese quail: review. J Poult Sci 7(9): 925-931. Woodard AE, Abplanalp H, Wilson WO, Vohra P. 1973. Japanese quail husbandry in the laboratory. www.iacuc.arizona.edu/poultry/species.html. 2008. Learning module: species information chicken and turkeys (10 April 2008).
88 www.quailsforafrica.com.html. 2008. History of the japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) (10 April 2008). Yu JY, Marquardt RR. 1973. Development, cellular growth, and function of the avian oviduct. J Bio Repro 8: 283-298. Yuwanta T. 2004. Dasar Ternak Unggas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
89 Lampiran 1. Analisis ragam dan uji lanjut kontras ortogonal pada umur masak kelamin Anova umur masak kelamin Class Level Information Class Levels Values perlakuan 9 P01 P02 P03 P11 P12 P21 P22 P31 P32 Anova umur masak kelamin Dependent Variable: respons Number of Observations Read 204 Number of Observations Used 204 Source DF Sum of Mean F Value Pr > F Squares Square Model 8 1568.344118 196.043015 54.08 <.0001 Error 195 706.950000 3.625385 Corrected Total 203 2275.294118 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE respons Mean 0.689293 4.421961 1.904044 43.05882 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F perlakuan 8 1568.344118 196.043015 54.08 <.0001 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F perlakuan 8 1568.344118 196.043015 54.08 <.0001 Contrast DF Contrast SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F p01 vs p02,p03,p11,p12,p21,p22,p31,p32 1 13.1018564 13.1018564 3.61 0.0588 p02 vs p03,p11,p12,p21,p22,p31,p32 1 199.5613160 199.5613160 55.05 <.0001 p03 vs p11,p12,p21,p22,p31,p32 1 0.0406757 0.0406757 0.01 0.9158 p11 vs p12,p21,p22,p31,p32 1 28.3253549 28.3253549 7.81 0.0057 p12 vs p21,p22,p31,p32 1 114.9314430 114.9314430 31.70 <.0001 p21 vs p22,p31,p32 1 516.6406368 516.6406368 142.51 <.0001 p22 vs p31 & p32 1 521.3355171 521.3355171 143.80 <.0001 p31 vs p32 1 118.9872004 118.9872004 32.82 <.0001
90 Level of N respons perlakuan Mean Std Dev P01 4 41.2500000 0.50000000 P02 27 40.5185185 1.39698495 P03 27 43.4074074 2.09870398 P11 24 42.4583333 1.38247310 P12 20 41.5500000 1.53811231 P21 27 48.0000000 3.13785816 P22 24 46.6666667 1.71100445 P31 24 42.5416667 1.86452387 P32 27 39.4814815 1.36917635 Uji Duncan Duncan's Multiple Range Test for respons Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 48 Error Mean Square 6.269508 Harmonic Mean of Cell Sizes 5.141585 Number of Means Critical Range 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3.140 3.302 3.409 3.486 3.546 3.593 3.631 3.663 Means with the same letter are not significantly different Duncan Grouping Mean N Perlakuan A 46.818 11 P21. A 46.000 6 P22 B 42.500 8 P31 B 42.000 5 P11 B 41.500 2 P01 B 41.500 8 P03 B 41.000 7 P12 B 39.800 5 P02 B 39.000 5 P32
91 Lampiran 2. Analisis ragam pada kadar estrogen Anova kadar estrogen puyuh umur 5 minggu Class Level Information Class Levels Values perlakuan 9 P01 P02 P03 P11 P12 P21 P22 P31 P32 Number of Observations Read 27 Number of Observations Used 27 Anova kadar hormon estrogen puyuh umur 5 minggu Dependent Variable: respons Source DF Sum of Mean Square F Value Pr > F Squares Model 8 9.35383467 1.16922933 2.02 0.1032 Error 18 10.43441064 0.57968948 Corrected Total 26 19.78824532 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE respons Mean 0.472697 22.53684 0.761373 3.378350 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F perlakuan 8 9.35383467 1.16922933 2.02 0.1032 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F perlakuan 8 9.35383467 1.16922933 2.02 0.1032 Level of N respons perlakuan Mean Std Dev P01 3 2.38619447 0.07819166 P02 3 3.17349845 0.56952733 P03 3 4.19843023 0.78248033 P11 3 4.15389625 1.11387565 P12 3 3.22159083 0.73520666 P21 3 2.61705178 0.27397074 P22 3 3.35091811 0.73213506 P31 3 3.47406527 0.79360302 P32 3 3.82950656 1.11907072
92 Lampiran 3. Analisis korelasi pada kadar estrogen dan panjang saluran telur pada puyuh umur 7 minggu Analisis korelasi Simple Statistics Variable N Mean Std Dev Sum Minimum Maximum Panjang oviduct 27 20.61852 10.29473 556.70 2.00 32.500 Estrogen 27 40.46207 28.74410 1092 5.65300 136.11400 Pearson Correlation Coefficients, N = 27 Prob > r under H0: Rho=0 Panjang oviduct Estrogen Panjang oviduct 1.00000 0.44738 0.0193 Estrogen 0.44738 0.0193 1.00000