Entry and Intracellular Localization of Brucella spp. in Vero Cells: Fluorescence and Electron Microscopy

Vet Pathol 2737-328 (990) Entry and Intracellular Localization of Brucella spp. in Vero Cells: Fluorescence and Electron Microscopy P. G. DETILLEUX, B. L. DEYOE, AND N. F. CHEVILLE US Department of Agriculture, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA Abstract. Vero cells were inoculated with the six species of Brucella (B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. suis, B. neotomae, B. canis, and B. ovis) and examined by fluorescence and electron microscopy. All Brucella spp. were internalized by Vero cells. In all cells except those inoculated with B. canis, the numbers of intracellular brucellae increased with time after inoculation. Intracellular brucellae were first seen within phagosomes and phagolysosomes. Subsequent localization within cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum was seen with all species of Brucella, except B. canis, which was restricted to phagolysosomes. Although rough brucellae were more adherent and entered a greater number of Vero cells, intracellular replication occurred in a larger percentage of cells with smooth rather than with rough brucellae. These results suggest that phagocytosed Brucella spp. are transferred ) to cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum, where unrestricted bacterial replication takes place; or 2) to phagolysosomes in which Brucella spp. fail to replicate. The various strains of Brucella spp. differ in their ability to induce their own transfer to the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Key words: Bacteria; Brucella; immunocytochemistry; in vitro; cell culture; ultrastructure. Bacteria of the genus Brucella are intracellular pathogens of human beings and animals, causing zoonoses of worldwide importance. Three principal species were originally differentiated on the basis of their major animal sources, i.e., goats for B. melitensis, cattle for B. abortus, and swine for B. s~is.~j* Cross-infections do occur, as most species of mammals are susceptible to Brucella. l8 Because it survives almost exclusively in animals, Brucella has the tendency to acquire different phenotypes when infecting new ho~ts.~,'~ This led to the description of three minor species, i.e., B. ovis in ~heep,~ B. canis in dogs,4 and B. neotomae in the desert wood rat,36 and of numerous variants, such as B. suis the rate limiting step in B. abortus infection of Vero cells and that brucellae that fail to enter the RER are destroyed or eliminated.9 In this morphologic study, we describe the penetration and intracellular localization of Brucella spp. in Vero cells. Our goals were to determine ) whether localization within RER is a characteristic of other species of Brucella, 2) how brucellae enter Vero cells, 3) how brucellae are transferred to the RER, and 4) the fate of internalized brucellae that fail to replicate within Vero cells. Materials and Methods biovar 2 that infect and B. suis biovar 4, nat- Eight strains representing the six species of ~ ~ were ~ ~ urally pathogenic for reindeer.24 used in this study (Table ). Except for B. ovis, cultures were Brucellae produce chronic infections with persistent grown On potato infusion agar slants for 48 hours at 37 c. Or recurrent bacteremia.'8 In Pregnant susceptible an- Brucella ovis was grown on tryptose agar slants containing imals, where it causes placentitis and abortion, the 5% bovine serum for 72 hours at 37 C in an atmosphere of organism replicates within placental trophoblasts. l8 5% CO,. Brucellae were harvested by gentle washing with Except for B. neotomae, each species of Brucella is sterile 0.85% NaCl and standardized turbidimetrically to a capable of intratrophoblastic replication in its natural concentration of x 0" bacteria/ml. For monolayer infechost.4,5,8,30,35 tion, bacterial suspension was diluted to a final concentration In ruminant trophoblasts, B. abortus replicates withof.o x lo9 bacteria/ml in Eagle's minimum essential medium (GIBCO Laboratories, Grand Island, NY) supplein cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum mented with L-glutamine (2 mm) and 0% fetal calf serum. (RER).'X~~ Similar intracellular localization is seen in Vera cells (African green monkey kidney fibroblasts), obchicken mesenchymal, yolk and tained from the National Veterinary Services Laboratories hepatic We Observed that in Vera cells, B. ahr- (Ames, IA), were used as host cells. Cell culture methods tus replicates within less than 20% Of the Cells it invades; within these cells, B. abortus is located within the RER.9 We suggested that transfer to the RER is 37 and infection procedure were as described.9 Briefly, subconfluent monolayers on coverslips were inoculated with 2 ml of Brucella suspension. The inoculum was centrifuged onto

38 Detilleux, Deyoe, and Cheville Table. Relative infectivity of different species of Brucella in comparison to B. abortus strain 2308s in Vero cells. Brucella Species Strain Natural Host Type Mean (Oh) Range (Oh) B. abortus 23088 Cattle Smooth oo* 45/20 Cattle Rough 9 (2)t 8-20 B. melitensis 6Mt Goat Smooth 32 () 30-32 B. suis biovar 330$ Swine Smooth 34 (2) 0-85 biovar 4 IB-2579 Reindeer Smooth 24 (2) 2-26 B. neotomae 48 Desert Wood Smooth 28 (2) 27-30 Rat B. canis RM6-66$ Dog Rough 0 () 0 B. ovis 692 Sheep Rough 2 (2) 2-3 * Results are expressed as percentage of strain 23083 (mean of two samples). t Number between parentheses indicates the number of determinations. $ Type strain (Bergey s Manual ). monolayers for 20 minutes at 550 x g. After 8 hours incubation at 37 C in a humidified incubator with an atmosphere of 5% CO,, the coverslips were washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and further incubated in fresh minimum essential medium supplemented with 0.25% fetal calf serum and 50 pg/ml gentamycin (Gentocin-Stering Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ), to kill extracellular bacteria. Medium was replaced at 24 hours. Four coverslips were sampled at 4, 8, 6, 24,36, and 48 hours after inoculation; the 4 hour and 8 hour coverslips were incubated in the presence of gentamycin for hour before further processing. Two coverslips were washed in PBS and incubated for 0 to 5 minutes in 2 ml of a 0.% solution of deoxycholate in distilled water to disrupt host cells. Samples of the Vero cell lysate were plated on tryptose agar containing 5% bovine serum. Brucella colonies were identified by colonial morphology and growth characteristics. The remaining coverslips were stained9 by indirect immunofluorescence using, as primary antibodies, a rabbit anti- B. abortus 23083 antiserum (smooth brucellae) or a rabbit anti-b. canis antiserum (rough brucellae), and as secondary antibody, a goat anti-rabbit FITC-conjugated antiserum (National Veterinary Services Laboratory, Ames, IA). To discriminate between extra- and intracellular bacteria, on coverslips sampled at 4, 8, 6, and 24 hours after inoculation, the primary antibody was applied for 30 minutes at 4 C before methanol-acetone fi~ation.~ After immunolabeling, all coverslips were treated for 5 minutes with a 25 pg/ml solution of Propidium iodide (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) to stain DNA and were then examined by epifluorescence microscopy (blue filter, excitation at 490 nm and emission at 5 5 nm). With this double fluorescence labeling technique, brucellae have an intense green-yellow fluorescence, while nuclei of eukaryotic cells fluoresce red (Figs. -4). When the primary antibody is applied before fixation, yellow-green fluorescence is restricted to extracellular organisms, while intracellular bacteria stain red (Figs. -4). The percentage of Vero cells containing 0,, 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 0, and more than 0 intracellular bacteria was estimated by examining, at a magnification of,000 x, a total of 200 cells on each of the two coverslips sampled at 4, 8, 6, and 24 hours after inoculation. In addition, for each of the two coverslips sampled 48 hours after inoculation, the number of cells per mm2 was estimated, at a total magnification of 400 x, by counting cell nuclei in five fields located along a diagonal across the coverslip ( 5 to 25 cell nucleilfield). The surface of the area was defined by a reticle in one eyepiece of the microscope. The number of infected cells per mm2 was then estimated, at a total magnification of loox, by counting the number of infected cells in 25 systematically selected fields, arranged in five rows and five columns (one to 20 infected cells/field). Results were expressed as percentage of infected cells. For ultrastructural studies, Vero cells, grown on microporous membranes in 2-mm Millicell-HA inserts (Millipore, Bedford, MA), were exposed to 0.8 ml of the various suspensions of Brucella, as described above for coverslips. Sterile minimum essential medium-inoculated inserts were controls. Two inserts were sampled at 8, 24, and 48 hours after inoculation, washed in cold PBS, and fixed for hour by immersion in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0. M sodium cacodylate buffer (ph 7.4) at 4 C. Following fixation, microporous membranes were removed from inserts and stored in 0. M sodium cacodylate buffer at 4 C. Four 2 mm2 pieces (sampled from the center of each membrane) were post-fixed in % osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in alcohols, cleared in propylene oxide, and embedded in epoxy resin. Embedding was done in rectangular rubber molds with the membranes being oriented so that sections would be cut perpendicularly to the Vero cell monolayers. Sections cut at pm and stained Figs. -4. Fluorescence micrographs. Vero cell monolayers, 24 (a), 36 (b), and 48 (c) hours after inoculation with various species of Brucella. Monolayers were stained by double immunofluorescence. The procedure to discriminate between intracellular (red) and extracellular (yellow-green) brucellae was applied to the 24-hour samples (a) in Figs. -3, and to all samples (a-c) in Fig. 4.

Brucella spp. in Vero Cells 39 Fig.. a-c. Vero cells inoculated with smooth B. abortus (23088). The number of intracellular brucellae increases sharply between 24 and 36 hours post-inoculation. At 36 and 48 hours post-inoculation, the cytoplasm of infected Vero cells is filled with intracellular organisms. Fig. 2. a-c. Vero cells inoculated with smooth B. suis biovar (330). The appearance of B. suzs-infected Vero cells at 36 hours post-inoculation (Fig. 2b) is similar to that of B. abortus-infected cells at 48 hours post-inoculation. Fig. 3. a-c. Vero cells inoculated with smooth B. melitensis (6M). Infected Vero cells contain fewer organisms than those infected with B. abortus (Fig. Ib, c) or B. suis (Fig. 2b, c). Fig. 4. a-c. Vero cells inoculated with rough B. canis (RM6-66). Note the few intracellular B. canis (arrows) and the lack of intracellular replication. Large numbers of extracellular brucellae adhere to Vero cells and directly to coverslips (open arrows).

320 Detilleux, Deyoe, and Cheville 4 Hours B. suis Biovar (330) 70 ' I 60 50 40 30 20 0 0 'I 4 Hours U. melitensis (6M) 8 Hours 24 Hours 60 50 40 30 20 0 0 0 2 3-5 6-0 >0 0 2 3-5 6-0 >0 0 2 3-5 6-0 >0 Number of Intracellular Brucellae I Vero Cell Fig. 5. Interactions of B. suis biovar (330) and B. melitensis (6M) with Vero cells after 4, 8, and 24 hours of incubation. Data are grouped according to the number of intracellular bacteria per cells, estimated for 200 Vero cells. Each 0 corresponds to specific sample values, and each represents the average of two samples. with toluidine blue were examined by light microscopy. One piece of membrane, which demonstrated an intact Vero cell layer and adherent or intracellular bacteria, was selected. Ultrathin sections were cut at 70 to 90 nm, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined with a Philips 4 0 transmission electron microscope. Brucellae were labeled on ultrathin sections of resinembedded Vero cell monolayers mounted on nickel grids using a post-embedding indirect immunogold labeling procedure. Primary antibodies were as described above for double fluorescence staining. The immunogold probe was a goat anti-rabbit antiserum coupled to 20 nm colloidal gold (AuroprobeOEM; Janssen Life Science Products, Olen, Belgium). Tris-buffered saline (ph 8.0) containing 0.05% triton-)(- 00, 0.5 M NaCl and % bovine serum albumin was used for diluting and washing solutions. Following etching for 0 minutes in 0% H,O,, sections were rinsed in ultra-distilled water and exposed for 0 minutes to % bovine serum albumin (BSA) to block nonspecific reactions. Excess BSA was blotted from sections and specimens were incubated for 2 hours with a /500 dilution of the primary antibody. After a 5 minute rinse in tris-buffered saline, sections were incubated for 2 hours with a /00 dilution of the immunogold probe. Sections were washed for 5 minutes in ultra-distilled water and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Results Pure cultures of Brucella were isolated from all inoculated Vero cell monolayers. The numbers of intracellular organisms increased markedly (from 00 to,000 times) over the 48 hour period, except for B. ovis whose numbers remained constant and B. canis whose numbers decreased slightly (data not shown). Fluorescence microscopic findings Smooth brucellae (B. abortus 2308S, B. melitensis, B. suis biovars and 4, B. neotomae) invaded and

Brucella spp. in Vero Cells 32 W - m al u a L (e 0 00 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 0 3 al P 0 G i g 00 5 W E L 90 E 80 n f 70 5 4 Hours I B. suis Biovar 4 (IAB2579) 8 Hours B. canis (RM6-66) 24 Hours 24 Hours 3 60 50 f 9 40 (e 0 30 $ 20 0 0 0 2 3-5 6-0 >0 0 2 3-5 6-0 >0 0 2 3-5 6-0 >0 Number of Intracellular Bacteria / Vero Cell Fig. 6. Interactions of B. suis biovar 4 (IAB 2579) and B. canis (RM6-66) with Vero cells after 4, 8, and 24 hours of incubation. Data are grouped according to the number of intracellular bacteria per cells, estimated for 200 Vero cells. Each 0 corresponds to specific sample values, and each represents the average of two samples. grew in Vero cells. Vero cells infected with the various species of smooth Brucella had similar morphology (Figs. -3). Depending on the strain of Brucella, 4 hours after inoculation, 25 to 40% of Vero cells contained one or more bacteria, and at the end of the inoculation period (8 hours after inoculation) 40 to 50% of Vero cells had intracellular brucellae (Figs. 5, 6). With all strains of Brucella, the number of cells containing at least one organism did not increase after 8 hours (Figs. 5, 6), except for a small proportion of these cells in which the number of intracellular bacteria increased sharply between 24 and 48 hours (Figs. -3). At 36 hours post-inoculation, the cytoplasm of Vero cells infected with B. suis biovar was filled with organisms (Fig. 2b). Similar brucellae-filled Vero cells were observed at 48 hours post-inoculation with B. abortus 23083, B. suis biovar 4, and B. neotomae (Fig. lc). In contrast, at both 36 and 48 hours post-inoculation, Vero cells infected with B. melitensis contained less bacteria than those infected with other brucellae (Fig. 3b, c). At 48 hours post-inoculation, the percentage of brucellae-filled Vero cells varied from to 9%; remaining Vero cells were either free of organisms or contained scattered clumps of intracytoplasmic Brucella-antigen. The largest percentage of infected Vero cells was found with B. suis biovar, followed by B. abortus 23083, B. melitensis, B. suis biovar 4, and B. neotomae (Table ). Most infected cells were in clusters of two to six cells. Infected cells in different phases of the mitotic cycle were frequent. Rough brucellae (B. abortus 45/20, B. ovis, B. canis) were markedly more adherent and, except for B. canis, more invasive than smooth brucellae. Numerous rough brucellae adhered to the surface of Vero cells and to

322 Detilleux, Deyoe, and Cheville Fig. 7. Electron micrograph. Vero cell monolayer 8 hours post-inoculation. Note B. abortus (45/20) attached to the basal surface of a Vero cell and enclosed by cytoplasmic extensions. Coated-pit is associated with partially surrounded B. abortus (arrow). Bar = 0.5 pm. areas of the coverslips not covered by Vero cells (Fig. 4). At 4 hours post-inoculation, 75% of Vero cells had six or more associated (extra- and intracellular) rough brucellae. With rough B. abortus 45/20 and B. ovis, some Vero cells were covered by extracellular bacteria. In the samples taken 4 to 24 hours after inoculation, the percentage of Vero cells containing intracellular brucellae was higher with B. abortus 45/20 and B. ovis than with brucellae of the smooth type. In contrast, intracellular B. canis were in a smaller percentage of Fig. 9. Electron micrograph. Vero cell monolayer 8 hours post-inoculation; B. abortus (23088) within a phagosome. Cytoplasmic process of Vero cell extends into microporous membrane. Note multivesicular bodies (arrows) and abundant microfilaments (arrowheads). Bar = pm. Vero cells (Fig. 6). Intracellular rough brucellae were frequently in clumps of five or more bacteria. At 36 and 48 hours post-inoculation, less than 0.5% of Vero cells had their cytoplasm filled with B. abortus 45/20 and B. ovis. Similarly infected Vero cells were not seen with B. canis. Fig. 8. Electron micrograph. Vero cell monolayer 8 hours post-inoculation. Note B. abortus (45/20) attached to the apical surface of a Vero cell. There is thickening of the plasma membrane adjacent to the B. abortus. Note coated-pit (arrow). Bar = 0.5 pm. Electron microscopic findings Intracellular brucellae were seen with all species of Brucella at all sampling times. Immunogold labeling of smooth brucellae was achieved using as primary antibody either anti-b. abortus 2308s (smooth) or anti- B. canis (rough) antisera. Attempts to label rough brucellae on thin sections were unsuccessful. At the end of the inoculation period (8 hours after inoculation), brucellae were seen in contact with Vero cell membranes, in different stages of engulfment by Vero cells, and intracellularly (Figs. 7-9). Adherent organisms were more frequent with rough brucellae. Most adherent brucellae were on the Vero cell surfaces

Brucella spp. in Vero Cells 323 Fig. 0. Electron micrograph. Vero cell monolayer 24 hours post-inoculation. Note B. canis (RM6-66) attached to the apical surface of a Vero cell and within phagolysosomes. Multilaminar membranous structures (myelin figures) are associated with intra-phagolysosomal brucellae (arrows). Bar = pm. Fig.. Electron micrograph. Vero cell monolayer 24 hours post-inoculation. Intraphagosomal B. melitensis (6M) surrounded by immunogold-labeled, membranous structures. Bar = 0.5 pm. facing the insert s microporous membrane (Fig. 7). Brucellae attached to the luminal surface of Vero cells were only seen with rough strains (Fig. 8). Several Vero cells had cytoplasmic processes that partially surrounded individual brucellae (Fig. 7); cytoplasmic membranes directly adjacent to brucellae were frequently thicker and occasionally formed coated-pits (Figs. 7, 8). Intracellular brucellae were within phagosomes, most of which contained only one morphologically intact bacterium (Fig. 9). Some brucellae, however, especially with rough strains, were within phagolysosomes. These contained one to 5 intact organisms as well as electron dense material, membrane debris, and myelin figures. Autophagic vacuoles and multivesicular bodies were frequent within Vero cells of infected monolayers, especially in cells containing intracellular brucellae. These structures were rare in control monolayers. At 24 hours post-inoculation, phagosomes and phagolysosomes containing morphologically intact brucellae were seen with all species of Brucellu (Fig. 0). Isolated organisms within ribosome-lined cisternae were in Vero cells inoculated with B. abortus 2308S, B. suis biovars and 4 and with B. neotomue. Brucellae attached to Vero cells luminal or basal surfaces were only observed with rough strains of Brucellu (Fig. 0). Intra-phagosomal and phagolysosomal smooth brucellae were frequently surrounded by concentric membranous structures similar to myelin figures (Figs. 0, ); in immunogold labeled samples, these structures were lined by gold particles (Fig. ). At 48 hours post-inoculation, both smooth and rough brucellae (except B. canis) were within cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (Figs. 2-4). The membranes of brucellae-filled cisternae were discontinuously lined by ribosomes and were continuous with membranes of normal-appearing rough endoplasmic reticulum (Figs. 3-6). In the most heavily infected cells, brucellae were also in perinuclear spaces (Fig. 2). Evidence of cellular degeneration (cell swelling and

324 Detilleux, Deyoe, and Cheville Fig. 2. Electron micrograph. Vero cell monolayer 48 hours post-inoculation. Vero cell contains numerous B. suis biovar ( 330) within cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum and within pennuclear envelope (arrow). Bar = pm. vacuolation) was minimal, although some heavily infected cells were necrotic with increased cytoplasmic electron-density and loss of structural detail. Clusters of two to ten brucellae were also found within phagolysosomes, especially with B. cunis and other rough brucellae (Fig. 5). While most smooth brucellae were morphologically intact, half the rough organisms appeared degraded (Figs. 5, 6). Myelin figures were frequent in association with intact and degraded brucellae in phagolysosomes (Fig. 6). Membrane-bound brucellae within mitotic cells were seen with B. abortus 2308S, B. suis biovar, B. neotomue, and B. ovis (Fig. 6). Discussion This comparative study indicates that all species of Brucellu attach to the surface of Vero cells and are internalized by phagocytosis. We believe that Brucellucontaining phagosomes can follow one of two routes: ) they can fuse with cisternae of the rough endoplas- mic reticulum (RER), transferring organisms to the lumen of this organelle, where unrestricted bacterial replication occurs, or 2) they can fuse with lysosomes forming phagolysosomes in which brucellae fail to replicate and are eventually destroyed (Fig. 7). Brucellu spp. clearly replicated within cisternae of the RER but not within phagolysosomes, i.e., heavily infected Vero cells had massive numbers of Brucellu within the RER without corresponding numbers in phagolysosomes. Localization within RER may provide a favorable environment that enhances Brucella growth. On primary isolation, most Brucellu strains are fastidious organisms requiring complex media containing several amino acids.7 Although brucellae do not require active protein synthesis by the host cell for intracellular replication,'o within the RER they may catabolize nascent polypeptides and incorporate liberated amino acids into bacterial proteins. Findings from this study confirm our suggestions that transfer to the RER, not internalization, is the

Brucella spp. in Vero Cells 325 Fig. 3. Electron micrograph. Vero cell monolayer 48 hours post-inoculation. Immunogold-labeled B. melitensis ( 6M) within cisternae of rough endoplasmic reticulum. A section of normal rough endoplasmic reticulum leads directly (arrow) into Brucella-containing cisternae. Bar = pm. Fig. 4. Electron micrograph. Vero cell monolayer 48 hours post-inoculation. Note B. ovis (692) within cisternae of rough endoplasmic reticulum. A section of normal rough endoplasmic reticulum leads directly (arrow) into Brucellucontaining cisterna. Bar = pm. limiting step for replication of Brucella spp. in Vero cells. Also, differences in infectivity for Vero cells between the various species of Brucella seem to correlate with differences in their ability to enter the RER. Intracisternal B. suis biovar 4 and B. abortus 2308S, which infected the largest percentage of Vero cells, were predominantly within cisternae of the RER. In contrast, intracellular B. canis, which failed to replicate in Vero cells, were within phagolysosomes. As reported for Brucella-infected trophoblasts in vivo, Itz2 Brucella spp. were not highly cytopathic for Vero cells, i.e., evidences of Vero cell degeneration were minimal even in heavily infected cells. The presence of numerous brucellae within mitotic Vero cells is additional evidence that intracellular Brucella interfere minimally with Vero cell metabolism. Brucellae are likely released when infected Vero cells disintegrate because of excessive intracellular bacterial replication. In contrast, intracellular pathogens like Listeria monocytogene~~~ and Shigella dysenteriae l6 cause rapid cytolysis of infected host cells. In contrast to L. monocytogenes, z7 the lack of cytopathogenicity of Brucella may be responsible for the delayed onset of abortion following experimental inoculation of pregnant ruminants with Brucella spp.,28-30 Bacteria-induced receptor-mediated vesicular transport is probably involved in Brucella spp. transfer to the RER. Because Brucella resides within the RER of different cell type^,^,^,^*^^ we believe that this process is bacterium-induced. Although smooth and rough brucellae differ in lipopolysaccharide ~tructure,~ they possess similar outer membrane most of which are conserved throughout the gen~s.~jl.~~ Since most Brucella spp., including rough variants, enter the RER, we suggest that the recognition signal is provided by a bacterial protein. The concentric membranous structures (myelin figures) that surrounded intra-phagosomal and phagolysosomal brucellae were of bacterial origin, as demonstrated by immunogold labeling. Similar structures have been described in phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells infected with B. abortus.7j9,23 Although some of these structures might be derived from dead brucellae, others may have resulted from de novo membrane synthesis by Brucella. Microorganisms can produce new surface proteins in response to changes in their envi- r~nrnent.'~,'~,~~ Within minutes of entry into macrophages, Toxoplasma gondii secrete a protein rich intraphagosomal membrane network that is believed to interfere with phagosomal microbicidal c Fig. 5. Electron micrograph. Vero cell monolayer 48 hours post-inoculation. Note intact and degraded B. ovis (692) within phagolysosomes. Bar = pm.

326 Detilleux, Deyoe, and Cheville Fig. 6. Electron micrograph. Vero cell monolayer 48 hours post-inoculation. Membrane-bound and intraphagolysosoma B. abortus (23088) are within a Vero cell in mitosis. Note chromosome (X), centriole (arrow) and spindle microtubules (arrowheads). Bar = pm. Phagosomal acidification may have triggered the formation of these membranous structures by Brucella. The presence of coated-pits, in association with brucellae attached at the surface of Vero cells, may indicate that Brucella uptake is receptor-mediated. This would confirm the observation that monodansylcadaverine, an inhibitor of receptor-mediated endocytosis, prevents the infection of Vero cells by B. abortus. lo Similarly, coated-pits are seen in association with adherent invasive Yersinia enterocoliticu26 and Shigellu jlexneri, l 5 but not with adherent non-invasive Escherichia coli.26 Since coated-pits were frequent at the surface of Vero cells and because bacterial engulfment involves the internalization of large areas of the cell surface, we cannot rule out that the association of coated-pits with attached brucellae was coincidental. Marked adhesiveness of B. abortus 45/20, B. ovis, and B. canis for Vero cell surfaces was probably the result of higher hydrophobicity due to the rough characteristics. Cultures of B. ovis and B. canis are always in the rough or mucoid phase, even on primary isolation from infected animal^.^ Adherence to cell surfaces is profoundly affected by electrostatic charge and hydrophobicity of both host-cells and ba~teria.*~,~~,~~ Correlation between bacterial hydrophobicity and the degree to which they associate with cells in culture has Fig. 7. Diagram that summarizes the infection of a Vero cell by Brucella spp. as determined in this study. () Brucellae adherent to the cytoplasmic membrane are internalized by phagocytosis. Some intraphagosomal brucellae (2) induce their transfer to cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (3) where unrestricted replication occurs (4). (5) Following massive intracisternal replication, some brucellae are within perinuclear envelope. Other Brucella-containing phagosomes (6) fuse with lysosomes forming phagolysosomes (7) in which brucellae fail to replicate and are eventually destroyed (8).

Brucella spp. in Vero Cells 327 been demonstrated for various bacterial pathogen^,^^,^^ including B. abort^.^ Loss of polysaccharide side chains increases the hydrophobicity of rough bacteria; this was reported for S. typhimurium2' and E. coli3' and was recently confirmed for B. abortu~.~ Failure to immuno-label rough brucellae on ultrathin sections probably resulted from the loss of antigenic reactivity during sample processing, perhaps due to the lack of 0 polysaccharide side chains in rough organisms. Immunogold labeling of surfaces of smooth B. abortus in ultrathin sections was observed using polyclonal anti-b. canis antiserum (anti-rough brucellae) as the primary antibody. This indicates that within the wall of smooth brucellae, some of the antigenic determinants recognized by this antiserum are not destroyed. Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the technical assistance of H. Persons (cell culture), J. Stasko (immunofluorescence and immunogold), K. Meredith (bacterial cultures), and J. Fagerland, M. Brack, and R. Kappmeyer (electron microscopy). This paper is part of a dissertation submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree in Veterinary Pathology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. References Anderson TD, Cheville NF, Meador VP: Pathogenesis of placentitis in the goat inoculated with Brucella abortus.. Ultrastructural studies. Vet Pathol23:227-239, 986 2 Bricker BJ, Tabatabai LB, Deyoe BL, Mayfield JE: Conservation of antigenicity in a 3 -kda Brucella protein. Vet Microbiol 8:33-325, 988 3 Buddle MB: Studies on Brucella ovis (nsp.), a cause of genital disease of sheep in New Zealand and Australia. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol54:35-364, 956 4 Carmichael LE, Kenney RM: Canine abortion caused by Brucella canis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 52:605-66, 968 5 Christiansen MJ, Thomsen A: Histologische Untersuchungen iiber Brucella suis-infektion bei Schweinen. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 8:64-85, 934 6 Cook I, Campbell RW, Barrow G: Brucellosis in north Queensland rodents. Aust Vet J 42:5-8, 966 7 Corbel MJ, Brinley-Morgan WJ: The genus Brucella. In: Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, ed. Krieg NR and Holt JG, pp. 377-388. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 984 8 Detilleux PG, Cheville NF, Deyoe BL: Pathogenesis of Brucella abortus in chicken embryos. Vet Pathol25: 38-46, 988 9 Detilleux PG, Deyoe BL, Cheville NF Penetration and intracellular growth of Brucella abortus in non-phagocytic cells in vitro. Infect Immun 58:2320-2328, 990 0 Detilleux PG, Deyoe BL, Cheville NF Penetration and intracellular growth of Brucella abortus in Vero cells: effects of endocytic and metabolic inhibitors. Am J Vet Res (in press) Douglas JT, Rosenberg EY, Nikaido H, Verstraete DR, Winter AJ: Porins of Brucella species. Infect Immun 44: 6-2, 984 2 Finlay BB, Heffron F, Falkow S: Epithelial cell surfaces induce Salmonella proteins required for bacterial adherence and invasion. Science 243:940-943, 989 3 Gaillard JL, Berche P, Mounier J, Richard S, Sansonetti P: In vitro model of penetration and intracellular growth of Listeria monocytogenes in the human enterocyte-like cell line Caco-2. Infect Immun 552822-2829, 987 4 Griffiths E, Stevenson P, Joyce P: Pathogenic Escherichia coli express new outer membrane proteins when growing in vivo. FEMS Microbiol Lett 6:95-99, 983 5 Hale TL: Invasion of epithelial cells by shigellae. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 37A:3-3 4, 986 6 Hale TL, Formal SB: Cytotoxicity of Shigella dysenteriae for cultured mammalian cells. Am J Clin Nutr 33: 2485-2490, 980 7 Hatten BA, Huang SY, Schulze ML, Sulkin SE: Electron microscopy of tissue culture cells infected with Brucella abortus. J Bacteriol 08:535-544, 97 8 Jubb KVF, Kennedy PC, Palmer N: Pathology of Domestic Animals, 3rd ed., vol. 3, pp. 345-35. Academic Press, London, England, 985 9 Karlsbad G, Kessel RWI, de Petris S, Monaco L: Electron microscope observations of Brucella abortus grown within monocytes in vitro. J Gen Microbiol35:383-390, 964 20 Kihlstrom E, Edebo L: Association of viable and inactivated Salmonella typhimurium 395 MS and MR 0 with HeLa cells. Infect Immun 4:85-857, 976 2 Magnusson KE, Johansson G: Probing the surface of Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella minnesota SR and R bacteria by aqueous biphasic partitioning in systems containing hydrophobic and charged polymers. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2:225-228, 977 22 Meador VP, Deyoe BL Intracellular localization of Brucella abortus in bovine placenta. Vet Pathol26:5 3-55, 989 23 Meador VP, Deyoe BL, Cheville NF Pathogenesis of Brucella abortus infection in the mammary gland and supramammary lymph node in the goat. Vet Pathol26: 357-368, 989 24 Meyer ME: Identification and virulence studies of Brucella strains isolated from eskimos and reindeer in Alaska, Canada, and Russia. Am J Vet Res 27:353-358, 966 25 Miller JF, Mekalanos JJ, Falkow S: Coordinate regulation and sensory transduction in the control of bacterial virulence. Science 243:9 6-922, 989 26 Miller VL, Falkow S: Evidence for two genetic loci in Yersinia enterocolitica that can promote invasion of epithelial cells. Infect Immun 56: 242-248, 988 27 Molello JA, Jensen R: Placental pathology. IV. Placental lesions of sheep experimentally infected with Listeria monocytogenes. Am J Vet Res 2544449, 963 28 Molello JA, Flint JC, Collier JR, Jensen R: Placental pathology.. Placental lesions of sheep experimentally infected with Brucella melitensis. Am J Vet Res 24:905-93, 963 29 Molello JA, Jensen R, Collier JR, Flint JC: Placental pathology.. Placental lesions of sheep experimentally

328 Detilleux, Deyoe, and Cheville infected with Brucella abortus. Am J Vet Res 24:95-92, 963 30 Molello JA, Jensen R, Flint JC, Collier JR: Placental pathology. I. Placental lesions of sheep experimentally infected with Brucella ovis. Am J Vet Res 24:897-903, 963 3 Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E: Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 9:29-33, 980 32 Santos JM, Verstraete DR, Perera VY, Winter AJ: Outer membrane proteins from rough strains of four Brucella species. Infect Immun 46: 88-94, 984 33 Schiemann DA, Crane MR, Swanz PJ: Surface prop- erties of Yersinia species and epithelial cell interactions in vitro by a method measuring total associated, attached and intracellular bacteria. J Med Microbiol24:205-2 8, 987 34 Sibley LD, Krahenbuhl JL, Adams GW, Weidner E: Toxoplasma modifies macrophage phagosomes by secretion of a vesicular network rich in surface proteins. J Cell Biol 03:867-874, 986 35 Smith T: A characteristic localization ofbacillus abortus in the bovine fetal membranes. J Exp Med 29:45 457, 99 36 Stoenner HG, Lackman DB: A new species of Brucella isolated from the desert wood rat, Neotoma lepida Thomas. Am J Vet Res 8:947-95, 957 Request reprints from Dr. P. G. Detilleux, National Animal Disease Center, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 5000 (USA).