Available online at Scholars Research Library. Der Pharmacia Lettre, 2017, 9 (1):85-92

Similar documents
Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Various Clinical Specimens

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at the tertiary care center, Dhiraj Hospital, Piparia, Gujarat

Prevalence of Extended Spectrum Beta- Lactamase Producers among Various Clinical Samples in a Tertiary Care Hospital: Kurnool District, India

Acinetobacter species-associated infections and their antibiotic susceptibility profiles in Malaysia.

Research Article. Drug resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates at PIMS Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan

Comparative Assessment of b-lactamases Produced by Multidrug Resistant Bacteria

Bacterial Pathogens in Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern from a Teaching Hospital, Bengaluru, India

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing microorganisms; state of the art. Laurent POIREL

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

Antimicrobial Resistance and Prescribing

RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF GRAM NEGATIVE BACILLI ISOLATES AMONG DIFFERENT CLINICAL SAMPLES FROM A DIAGNOSTIC CENTER OF KANPUR

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance and Sensitivity with Reference to Ages of Elders

Detection of Inducible AmpC β-lactamase-producing Gram-Negative Bacteria in a Teaching Tertiary Care Hospital in North India

Detection of ESBL Producing Gram Negative Uropathogens and their Antibiotic Resistance Pattern from a Tertiary Care Centre, Bengaluru, India

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Pathogens in Canine Urinary Tract Infections

Selective toxicity. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/17/2016

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.625, ISSN: , Volume 3, Issue 4, May 2015

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

PREVALENCE OF MULTI-DRUG RESISTANT (MDR) PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA

International Journal of Research in Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics

Isolation, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of uropathogens isolated at a tertiary care centre

2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report

Mechanism of antibiotic resistance

Prevalence of Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae Strains in Latvia

High Antibiotic Resistance Pattern Observed in Bacterial Isolates from a Tertiary Hospital in South East Nigeria

The First Report of CMY, AAC(6')-Ib and 16S rrna Methylase Genes among Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Iran

Antibiotic utilization and Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance in intensive care units

Inhibiting Microbial Growth in vivo. CLS 212: Medical Microbiology Zeina Alkudmani

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Study of Fluoroquinolone Usage Sensitivity and Resistance Patterns

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

Prevalence and Resistance pattern of Pseudomonas strains isolated from ICU Patients

Detection of Methicillin Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Using Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

Available online at ISSN No:

Sepsis is the most common cause of death in

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Aerobic bacterial infections in a burns unit of Sassoon General Hospital, Pune

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(3):

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL) TESTING

Isolation of Urinary Tract Pathogens and Study of their Drug Susceptibility Patterns

What does multiresistance actually mean? Yohei Doi, MD, PhD University of Pittsburgh

African Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Development

GeNei TM. Antibiotic Sensitivity. Teaching Kit Manual KT Revision No.: Bangalore Genei, 2007 Bangalore Genei, 2007

UDC: : :579.22/ :615.28

Antibiotics. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/18/2017

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(8):

BACTERIOLOGICALL STUDY OF MICROORGANISMS ON MOBILES AND STETHOSCOPES USED BY HEALTH CARE WORKERS IN EMERGENCY AND ICU S

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

Antibacterial Agents & Conditions. Stijn van der Veen

National Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Obtained from Intensive Care Unit Patients from 1993 to 2002

Original Articles. K A M S W Gunarathne 1, M Akbar 2, K Karunarathne 3, JRS de Silva 4. Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health, 2011; 40(4):

Volume-7, Issue-2, April-June-2016 Coden IJABFP-CAS-USA Received: 5 th Mar 2016 Revised: 11 th April 2016 Accepted: 13 th April 2016 Research article

Title: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) Mediated Modulation of Bacterial Antibiotic

The impact of antimicrobial resistance on enteric infections in Vietnam Dr Stephen Baker

Aerobic Bacterial Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Pus Isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Hadoti Region

An#bio#cs and challenges in the wake of superbugs

Prevalence and Susceptibility Profiles of Non-Fermentative Gram-Negative Bacilli Infection in Tertiary Care Hospital

β-lactams resistance among Enterobacteriaceae in Morocco 1 st ICREID Addis Ababa March 2018

Identification And Speciation Of Acinetobacter And Their Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Lab. General Microbiology

Outline. Antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial resistance in gram negative bacilli. % susceptibility 7/11/2010

Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Irrational use of antimicrobial agents often

Multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter (MDRA) Surveillance and Control. Alison Holmes

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Salmonella Typhi From Kigali,

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

Recommendations for Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Restrictive Interventions in Acute Hospitals in Ireland

Original Article. Ratri Hortiwakul, M.Sc.*, Pantip Chayakul, M.D.*, Natnicha Ingviya, B.Sc.**

Study of Bacteriological Profile of Corneal Ulcers in Patients Attending VIMS, Ballari, India

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Dr. C. MANIKANDAN, Director,

What is antimicrobial resistance?

Antimicrobial Cycling. Donald E Low University of Toronto

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(11):

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital

Detection and Quantitation of the Etiologic Agents of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Endotracheal Tube Aspirates From Patients in Iran

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Lack of Change in Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Pediatric Hospital Despite Marked Changes in Antibiotic Utilization

Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Salmonella species from various antibiotic

ESBL & AmpC detection in Klebsiella species by Non Molecular methods

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory

Internationally indexed journal

Bacteriological profile of burn patients and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of burn wound isolates

Transcription:

Available online at www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com Scholars Research Library Der Pharmacia Lettre, 2017, 9 (1):85-92 (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html) ISSN 0975-5071 USA CODEN: DPLEB4 Plasmid Profile Analysis of Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Clinical Samples of Hospitalized Patient in Dr M. Djamil Hospital, Padang, West Sumatera Rustini *, Jamsari, Marlina Zubir N Faculty of Pharmacy, Andalas University, Indonesia *Corresponding author: Rustini, Faculty of Pharmacy, Andalas University, Indonesia; Email: rustiniruslan@gmail.com ABSTRACT Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading causes of nosocomial infections and responsible for 10% of all hospitalacquired infections. P. aeruginosa nosocomial infections is generally difficult to killed because bacterial resistant mechanism. Increasing bacterial resistance to all antibiotics of different classes are often obtained and transmitted by conjugation, transformation, or plasmid transduction. The aimed was conducted to determine the antibiotic resistant patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical samples in West Sumatera, Indonesia. 95 clinical data were collected from M. Djamil Hospital, Padang (Indonesia). Antibiotic susceptibility was determined on Mueller Hinton agar using the disc diffusion method according to the modified Kirby-Bauer technique. Plasmid isolation was done using a commercial plasmid isolation kit QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit. The resultant plasmids were separated using gel electrophoresis. In this study, 34 (35.79%) of P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics. The plasmid analysis revealed that sixteen multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa isolates had a plasmid. A isolate with single plasmid band 300bp, twelve of the isolates had a single plasmid band >1kbp and two isolates (PASw7 and PASp11) had two plasmids band > 1kbp. KEYWORDS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacterial Resistance, Antibiotics, Plasmid INTRODUCTION Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a non-fermentative gram negative bacteria widely distributed in nature and can survive on a wide variety of surfaces and in hospital environment, as the wards encourage bacterial growth [1]. P. aeruginosa is an important opportunistic pathogens that cause nosocomial infections, especially in patients with decreasing of immune system [2]. P. aeruginosa is a leading cause of nosocomial infections and responsible for 85

10% of all hospital-acquired infections [3]. Infections caused by P. aeruginosa are often severe and life threatening and difficult to treat because of the limited susceptibility to antimicrobial agents and the high frequency of an emergence antibiotic resistance during therapy, thus resulting in severe adverse outcomes [4]. P. aeruginosa nosocomial infections is generally difficult to killed because of the possibility intrinsic resistance and its ability to obtain faster resistance mechanism against many groups of antimicrobials [5]. P. aeruginosa is naturally resistant to B-Lactams. Furthermore, they easily acquire resistance to new antibacterial agents by mutational changes or acquisition of genetic material. In other study, P. aeruginosa strains isolated was presented resistance to carbenicillin and gentamicin. P. aeruginosa is intrinsically less susceptible to the fluoroquinolones and usually it is moderately susceptible or resistant [6]. Multi Drug Resistant P. aeruginosa (MDRPA) is a condition that bacteria resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics such as penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactam, carbapenem, aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. Inappropriate antibiotics administration can cause P. aeruginosa resistant to several classes of antibiotics [7]. MDRPA cases reported varied from 0.6% - 32% according to various research studies conducted in various regions. MDRPA prevalence increased during the last decade and has become a major concern among patients who were hospitalized [8]. Increasing bacterial resistance to all antibiotics of different classes are often obtained and transmitted by conjugation, transformation, or transduction plasmid [9]. DNA plasmid are extra chromosomal element of finite size, usually stably inherited within a bacterial cell line and potentially capable of transfer between strains, species, or genera [10]. They were discovered in enteric bacteria for the first time and from the late 1950s onwards were increasingly associated with antibiotics resistance. Its main function is to carry antibiotics resistant genes, which are responsible for the increase pathogenicity of most bacteria [11]. Therefore, this study is aimed to determine the percentage of multidrug resistance of P. aeruginosa strains that are plasmid mediated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Isolated Bacteria A total of 95 clinical data were collected from M. Djamil Hospital, Padang (Indonesia). All of specimens were cultured on Cetrimide agar in order to isolate P. Aeruginosa strains. Then plates were incubated at 37 C for 24 h [12]. Identification of P. aeruginosa Isolates Cetrimide Agar is used for the identification of P. aeruginosa. Sample to be tested inoculate by spreading on the surface of the plates. Incubate for 24 hours at 37 0 C. The presence of growth is indicative of a positive reaction. Examine colonies under short wavelength (254nm) ultraviolet light for the presence of fluorescein. 86

Kirby- Bauer Disc Diffusion method Antibiotic susceptibility was determined on Mueller Hinton agar using the disc diffusion method according to the modified Kirby-Bauer technique. All of isolated P. aeruginosa strains were tested for their sensitivity to the following Antibiotics: Cephalosporin (Ceftazidime 30 g, Cefotaxime 30 g, Ceftriaxone 30 g, dan Cefoperazone 30 g), Quinolon (Ciprofloxacin 5 g, Levofloxacin5 g, dan Ofloxacin 5 g), Aminoglycoside (Gentamicin 10 g dan Amikacin 30 g), Penicillin (Piperacillin 100 g dan Ticarcillin 75 g), dan Carbapenem (Meropenem 10 g dan Imipenem 10 g). Isolates were considered multidrug resistant if they showed resistance to 3 or more of the tested antibiotics [13]. Plasmid Isolation and Profiling Plasmid isolation was done using a commercial plasmid isolation kit QIAprep Spin Minipep Kit according to the manufacturer instructions. Gel Elecetrophoresis The resultant plasmids were separated using gel electrophoresis. Agarose gel (1,5%) in 1X TBE Buffer were prepared and placed in gel electrophoresis tank containing 1X TBE buffer. The current supplied about 100V for 30 minutes and the resulting bands were visualized under Gel Documentation and compared with 100 bp and 1kb ladder [14]. RESULTS Among the 95 P. aeruginosa isolates 35 (36,84%) were from sputum, 22 (23,16%) from swab, 23 (24,21%) from pus, 10 (10,53%) from urine, 2 (2,10%) from feces and 3 (3,16%) from blood samples. All the isolates were found to be resistant to Ceftazidime, Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, Cefoperazone, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Ofloxacin, Gentamicin, Amikacin, Piperacillin, Ticarcillin, Meropenem and Imipenem. The results of antibiotic susceptibility testing are shown in Table 1. Maximum resistance was seen to ceftriaxone (43,16%) and cefotaxime (42,16%) followed by cefoperazone (36,84%), Ofloxacin (31,58%) and Ciprofloxacin (28,42%). Minimum resistance was seen to amikacin (8,42%). In this study, 34 (35.79%) of P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics. The isolates were the antibiotic resistant profile of 34 P. aeruginosa isolates shown in Table 2. Isolates number PAU2, PASp26, and PASw21 were resistant with all antibiotic tested. Plasmid mediated analysis of different multidrug resistant P. Aeruginosa from clinical samples were observed by agarose gel which showed plasmid bands in different combinations (Figure 1-3). The plasmid analysis revealed that sixteen multidrug resistant P. Aeruginosa isolates had plasmid. A isolate with single plasmid band 300bp, Twelve of the isolates had single plasmid band >1kbp and two isolates (PASw7 and PASp11) had two plasmids band > 1kbp (Table 3). 87

DISCUSSION P. aeruginosa isolates were identified using media Cetrimide Agar (CA), which is a selective medium for the bacteria growth. All Cetrimide Agar media isolates can change to green or greenish yellow indicates that the positive isolates of P. aeruginosa. Media Cetrimide Agar contains Cetrimide (cetyltrimethylammonium ammonium bromide) is quartener ammonium can inhibit growth of other microorganisms by breaking (lysis) of the bacterial cell. Cetrimide also can increase of the production of pigment P. aeruginosa is pyosianin and pyoverdine that would cause a greenish or greenish-yellow color [15]. The result of antibiotic activity testing showed 34 (35.79%) isolates was MDRPA, marked with the isolates were resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics. This result is higher than Akin bade research at 2012 which 20% of isolates was MDRPA [13]. Plasmid known as one factor that can lead bacterial resistance to antibiotics in the presence of R plasmids that carry genes for resistance and become a medium to facilitate the rapid spread of bacterial resistance of antibiotics, thereby its contribute resulting MDRPA [10]. Plasmid identification of 34MDRPA isolates showed that 16 isolates had plasmid and characterized by band plasmid fluoresce under UV light and Gel Documentation instrument. The amount 13 isolates had a band with a size above 1 kb, PASp29 isolates had a band with a size of 300 bp, and 2 isolates (PASw7 and PASp11) had 2 plasmids with two band of different sizes above 1 kb (Figure 2). It shown that almost all MDRPA isolates had plasmid with band size exceeding 1 kb which shows that plasmids are large. PAU2 isolate had a band with 1 kb size was resistant to all antibiotics tested, while PAU6, PAP9 and PAP17 isolates was resistant to 8 antibiotics tested and PASw2 and PAP16 isolates resistant to 7 antibiotics tested. PASp29 isolate had plasmid with band 300 bp was resistant to 12 antibiotics tested, whereas PASw7 and PASp11 isolates that has two band of plasmids with different sizes above 1 kb was resistant to 8 and 11 antibiotics. The results obtained that the plasmid size does not ensure high or low the antibiotic resistance. The number of antibiotic resistant genes contained in plasmid which can affect more or at least the bacteria resist to antibiotics. Overall, all plasmid MDRPA isolates was resistant to the class of cephalosporins, such as ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and sefoperazon. The results of this study indicate that 47.06% MDRPA isolates had a plasmid, the plasmids can cause resistance of bacteria to antibiotics (extra chromosomal resistance) and accelerate the spread of antibiotics resistance that will cause MDRPA. Conversely, 18 MDRPA isolates with no plasmid showed that the isolates were resistant not caused by extra chromosomal resistance, but due to other resistance mechanisms, such as non-genetic, chromosomal resistance or cross-resistance. Plasmids are DNA circular element lies free in a bacterial cell (extra chromosomal) which replicates itself independently and not depend on the bacterial chromosome [10]. Plasmid known as a mediator that facilitates the rapid spread of bacterial resistance to antibiotics because it can be transferred not only in one species of bacteria, but also in one genus [9]. Bacteria that had plasmid (R plasmid) had two groups of genes, which includes the factor of resistance transfer genes for plasmid replication &conjugation and determinant R that have the resistance gene and encode the production of enzymes for inactivation of antibiotics. The study on the burn unit patients at University Hospital Menoufiya showed a total of 18 isolates (39.1%) of the total 46 isolates have the plasmid, of which 8 strains (44.4%) 88

had 3 plasmids, 7 strains (38.9%) had one plasmid, 2 strains (11.1%) has 2 plasmids and one strain (5.5%) had 5 plasmids [16]. The result of that study as lower than this study (47.06% isolates had plasmid) Other studies on the surgical unit patients of the teaching hospital Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, 14 strains known to had the plasmid in which eight strains had the same pattern of plasmid with 1-3 band [18]. The results of another study in South West Nigeria, the determination of plasmid using Miniprep kit and a 0.8% agarose gel result 8 strains (36.4%) of the total 22 strains had plasmid band, 6 strain has a single plasmid band and two strains has two band with sizes ranging from 662 to 830bp [13]. From this study result, the case of MDRPA resistance which had plasmid was high in patients of Dr. M. Djamil hospital. It was happened because R plasmid can be transferred horizontally by conjugation method so that the recipient cell will be resistance, similar to the donor cell. The plasmid displacement occurs not only in one species of bacteria but also can occur in a single genus, with the result that increase bacterial resistance and reduce the effectiveness of treatment. Early detection will greatly assist in the control of hospital infections caused by these bacteria [19]. Tabel-1: Antibiotic resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates No. Antibiotic Resistant No. Percentage (%) 1 Ceftazidime(CAZ) 24 25.26 2 Cefotaxime(CTX) 40 42.10 3 Ceftriaxone(CRO) 41 43.16 4 Cefoperazone(CFP) 35 36.84 5 Ciprofloxacin (CIP) 27 28.42 6 Levofloxacin (LEV) 19 20.00 7 Ofloxacin (OFX) 30 31.58 8 Gentamicin (CN) 27 28.42 9 Amikacin (AK) 8 8.42 10 Piperacillin (PRL) 14 14.74 11 Ticarcillin (TIC) 22 23.16 12 Meropenem (MEM) 23 24.21 13 Imipenem (IPM) 22 23.16 89

Figure-1: Plasmid profiles of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates 1: DNA Ladder; 2: PASp22 isolate; 3: PAP7isolate; 4: PAU3 isolate; 5: PAP12isolates; 6: PASp16 isolate; 7: PAP13 isolate;8: PAP22 isolate;9: PAD3 isolate;10: PASp26 isolate; 11: PAU6 isolate;12: PAP17 isolate;13: PAP18 isolate) Figure-2: Plasmid profiles of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates 1: DNA Ladder; 2: PASw2 isolate; 3: PASp2isolate; 4: PAP8 isolate; 5: PAP9isolates; 6: PASp9 isolate; 7: PAP21 isolate; 8: PASp34 isolate; 9: PAP14 isolate;10: PAP16 isolate; 11: PASp28 isolate; 12:PASp30 isolate; 13:PAP19 isolate. 90

Figure-3: Plasmid profiles of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1: DNA Ladder; 2: PASw1 isolate; 3: PASw4isolate; 4: PAP3 isolate; 5: PASw7isolates; 6: PASw21 isolate; 7: PAU2 isolate; 8: PASp11 isolate;9: PASp35 isolate; 10: PASp26 isolate; 11: PASp29 Table-3: Plasmid profiles of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates No Isolates Plasmid band number Band size 1 PASw2 1 > 1kbp 2 PASw7 2 > 1kbp 3 PASw21 1 > 1kbp 4 PAU2 1 > 1kbp 5 PAP9 1 > 1kbp 6 PASp11 2 > 1kbp 7 PASp35 1 > 1kbp 8 PAP14 1 > 1kbp 9 PAP22 1 > 1kbp 10 PAD3 1 > 1kbp 11 PASp26 1 > 1kbp 12 PAP16 1 > 1kbp 13 PAU6 1 > 1kbp 14 PASp29 1 300 bp 15 PAP17 1 > 1kbp 16 PAP18 1 > 1kbp 91

REFERENCES 1. Arora D, et al. Int J Pharm Sci, 2011, 3(2), 1488-1491. 2. Vahdani M, et al. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2012, 25(2), 78-81. 3. National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System. Am J Infect Control, 2004, 32, 470-485. 4. Carmeli YN, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999, 43, 1379-1382. 5. Strateva T, Yordanov D, J of Medical Microbiology 2009, 58: 1133-1148. 6. Araque M, Velazco E, Int Care Med, 1998, 24(8), 839-844. 7. Japoni A, et al. Iranian Red Crescent Med J, 2009, 11(3), 244-253. 8. Kalaivani R, et al. Int J Cur Res Rev, 2013, 5(17), 28-35. 9. Raj A, Univers JEnvironRes Technol, 2012, 2(3), 18-324. 10. Alan V, et al. J Gen Virol, 2001, 147, 4763-4780. 11. Datta N, Hughes VM, Nature 1983, 306, 616-613. 12. Chessebrough M, Medical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries Vol. II Microbiology, Butterworth Heinemann Ltd, 1993, 264-265. 13. Akingbade OA, et al. World ApplSci J, 2012, 20(6), 766-775. 14. Bikandi JR, et al. Bioinformatics, 2004, 20, 798-799. 15. Brown A, Microbiological applications lab manual, 8 th Ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2001, 153-159. 16. Koura BA, et al. Molecular Diagnosis and Vaccines, 2003, 1(1), 59-70. 17. Mahmoud AB, et al. Journal of Virology & Microbiology, 2013, 1, 1-13. 18. Olayinka AT, et al. International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, 2009, 1(3), 79-83. 19. Elias HM, et al. International Journal of Microbiology and Immunology Research, 2013, 1(8), 80-86. 92