Staphylococcus aureus with the Disc

Similar documents
Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to

of Staphylococcus aureus

Susceptibility Tests for Methicillin-Resistant (Heteroresistant) Staphylococci

Aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci

Acquired and Native Resistance of Staphylococcus

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Resistance to cloxacillin among hospital staphylococci.

Disk Susceptibility Studies with Cefazolin and Cephalothin

Resistance of Coagulase-Positive Staphylococci

Evaluation of MicroScan MIC Panels for Detection of

Determination of antibiotic sensitivities by the

Synergism of penicillin or ampicillin combined with sissomicin or netilmicin against enterococci

Comparison of tablets and paper discs for antibiotic sensitivity testing

Methicillin-Resistant, Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci:

RELIABLE AND REALISTIC APPROACH TO SENSITIVITY TESTING

Pharmacological Evaluation of Amikacin in Neonates

In Vitro Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, and Amikacin

Tel: Fax:

against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus : a multicentre study

Quality Control Testing with the Disk Antibiotic Susceptibility Test of Bauer-Kirby-Sherris-Turck

New Method for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Reassessment of the "Class" Concept of Disk Susceptibility Testing

available. and P. aeruginosa resistant to gentamicin by standardized disk testing (1) in the Microbiology Laboratory

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

Comparative Activity of Netilmicin, Gentamicin, Amikacin, and Tobramycin Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae

Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility results obtained with Adatab* and disc methods

GeNei TM. Antibiotic Sensitivity. Teaching Kit Manual KT Revision No.: Bangalore Genei, 2007 Bangalore Genei, 2007

Penicillinase-Resistant Penicillins and Cephalosporins

Factors affecting plate assay of gentamicin

Effeet on Bacterial Growth

Staphylococcus aureus

by adding different antibiotics to sera containing

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Therapy of Staphylococcal Infections in Monkeys

Activity of Three Aminoglycosides and Two Penicillins Against

Comparison of Clindamycin, Erythromycin, and Methicillin in Streptococcal Infections in Monkeys

Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital

6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

MICHAEL J. RYBAK,* ELLIE HERSHBERGER, TABITHA MOLDOVAN, AND RICHARD G. GRUCZ

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli

Susceptibility of Respiratory Tract Anaerobes to Orally Administered Penicillins and Cephalosporins

Q1. (a) Clostridium difficile is a bacterium that is present in the gut of up to 3% of healthy adults and 66% of healthy infants.

Detection of Methicillin Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Using Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods in a Tertiary Care Hospital

2 0 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr. 8 hr. 10 hr. 12 hr.14 hr. 16 hr. 18 hr. 20 hr. 22 hr. 24 hr. (time)

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern in Bacterial Endocarditis

Susceptibility and Synergy Studies of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis

Susceptibility Testing

Fluoroquinolones resistant Gram-positive cocci isolated from University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Effects of Minocycline and Other Antibiotics on Fusobacterium necrophorum Infections in Mice

Evaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test System

Discrepancy Between Carbenicillin and Ampicillin Activities Against Enterococci and Listeria

Ciprofloxacin, Enoxacin, and Ofloxacin against Aerobic and

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. CRL Training course in AST Copenhagen, Denmark 23-27th Feb.

Mechanism of Chloramphenicol-Cephaloridine Synergism on Enterobacteriaceae

NAFCILLIN AND OXACILLIN COMPARATIVE ANTISTAPHYLOCOCCAL ACTIVITY IN MICE. J. A. YURCHENCO, M. W. HOPPER, T. D. VINCE and G. H.

Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Serratia:

VLLM0421c Medical Microbiology I, practical sessions. Protocol to topic J05

Improved Susceptibility Disk Assay Method Employing an

Prevalence and Drug Resistance Patterns of Staphylococcus Aureus in Lactating Dairy Cow s Milk in Wolayta Sodo, Ethiopia

Saxena Sonal*, Singh Trishla* and Dutta Renu* (Received for publication January 2012)

There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

Lactose-Fermenting Bacteria Isolated from

Synergy Between Cephalosporin and Aminoglycoside

Lactose-Fermenting Bacteria Isolated from Burni Patients

Penicillin, and Rifampin

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in dermatology and burn wards

IN VITRO COMBINATION EFFECTS OF NORFLOXACIN, GENTAMICIN, AND Ĉ- LACTAMS ON Ĉ- LACTAM RESISTANT PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA

Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic System for Susceptibility Testing of Aminoglycosides and Gram-Negative Bacilli

RESISTANCE OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS TO VANCOMYCIN IN ZARQA, JORDAN

Eradicating Carrier State of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus

The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal, 2018, 5(1): Research Article

ISOLATION AND ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF CEFAZOLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS, COMPARED WITH COAGULASE- NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI

Original Article. Hossein Khalili a*, Rasool Soltani b, Sorrosh Negahban c, Alireza Abdollahi d and Keirollah Gholami e.

Received 10 November 2006/Returned for modification 9 January 2007/Accepted 17 July 2007

In Vitro Susceptibility of Brucella

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Advance Access published August 26, 2006

Performance Information. Vet use only

Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Branhamella catarrhalis

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

University, New York, New York Received for publication 7 May was measured by the broth dilution method as previously

SAMPLE. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals

Emergence of Gentamicin- and Carbenicillin-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Hospital Environment

Bacteria Isolated from Clinical Specimens1

Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

Detection of vancomycin susceptibility among clinical isolates of MRSA by using minimum inhibitory concentration method

Original Article. Suwanna Trakulsomboon, Ph.D., Visanu Thamlikitkul, M.D.

TOLYPOMYCIN, A NEW ANTIBIOTIC. V IN VITRO AND IN VIVO ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY. Masahiro Kondo, Tokiko Oishi and Kanji Tsuchiya

Antibacterial activity of Stephania suberosa extract against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Tobramycin. Received for publication 5 December 1974

Visit ABLE on the Web at:

Acquisition of antibiotic resistance by

MRSA surveillance 2014: Poultry

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

Volume-7, Issue-2, April-June-2016 Coden IJABFP-CAS-USA Received: 5 th Mar 2016 Revised: 11 th April 2016 Accepted: 13 th April 2016 Research article

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(8):

Principles and Practice of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Microbiology Technical Workshop 25 th September 2013

Version 1.01 (01/10/2016)

Transcription:

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, May 1972, p. 422-426 Vol. 1, No. 5 Copyright 1972 American Society for Microbiology Printed in U.S.A. Identification of Cephalosporin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with the Disc Diffusion Method HANS 0. HALLANDER AND GUNNAR LAURELL einstitute of Medical Microbiology, Department of Clinical Bacteriology, Untiversity of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden Received for publication 7 January 1972 Methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, in total 84, representing 16 laboratories in 8 different countries were all resistant to 32,ug of cephalothin per ml with the same typical heteroresistant pattern. With the disc diffusion method, they were easily detected when cephalexin discs were used. With cephalothin discs, on the other hand, 26 to 49% would have been falsely categorized as Group I or II after 24 hr. It is recoended that susceptibility testing of S. aureus to cephalosporins by using the paper disc method be performed with 30-,ug cephalexin discs on Mueller- Hinton agar without blood. With an inoculum of 106 bacteria/ml, an incubation temperature of 30 C, and an incubation time of 24 hr, a of less than 10 indicates presumptive heteroresistance. This corresponds to the international recoendation with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 32 Ag/ml as the upper limit of Group I. Genetic as well as clinical evidence indicates cross-resistance between penicillinase-stable penicillins and cephalosporins in Staphylococcus aureus (3-5, 8, 11-14, 17). This resistance has also been shown to be heterogeneous (3, 11) in that the majority of bacteria may be susceptible whereas a smaller proportion is highly resistant. The minority of organisms resistant to methicillin typically appear as slow-growing microcolonies, which are more easily detected after incubation at 30 C or on hypertonic medium (1, 9, 10). This highly resistant minority, when selected out and transferred to medium without antibiotics, reverts to the original state within a few generations and then usually grows at the normal rate (9). According to recoendations given by a World Health Organization-sponsored group (6), S. aureus strains with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) above 2,g of methicillin per ml should be presumed heteroresistant with an all-or-none interpretation in the disc diffusion test. However, susceptibility to cephalosporin is still given in four categories which may be explained by the fact that the categorization is also printed for species other than S. aureus. The purpose of this paper is to define technical modifications ofthe disc method to make it more suitable for detection of cephalosporin-resistant strains of S. aureus. MATERIALS AND METHODS Strains. Eighty-four coagulase- and penicillinasepositive strains of methicillin-resistant staphylococci and 49 coagulase-positive and methicillin-susceptible ones, 30 of which also produced penicillinase, were analyzed with regard to cephalosporin resistance. Methicillin resistance was determined by growth in the presence of 12.5,ug/ml after 48 hr at 30 C (1, 15). Seventy of the methicillin-resistant strains were supplied from 16 laboratories in 8 different countries. Fourteen of the methicillin-resistant strains represented six epidemic outbreaks in five Swedish hospitals. The 49 methicillin-susceptible strains were isolated from clinical material at the University Hospital of Uppsala, Sweden. All were susceptible to 2,g/of methicillin per ml. Media. The following disc diffusion experiments were carried out: (i) Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar (BBL) with 5% defibrinated sheep blood; (ii) Mueller- Hinton agar (Difco); (iii) Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco) with 5% defibrinated sheep blood. Plate dilution experiments were carried out with: 0.3% meat extract (Difco), 1% peptone (Difco), 1.5% agar (Difco) and 0.5% NaCl in 1,000ml of distilled water; ph 7.3 to 7.4. Nutrient broth experiments were carried out in the same medium as the plate dilution experiments, except that the agar was omitted. Antibiotics. The antibiotics used were as follows: (i) sodium methicillin (Belfacillin, Astra), stored at -20 C in distilled water, 0.1 g/ml (each sample thawed and used only once); (ii) sodium cephalothin (Keflin, Eli Lilly & Co.), stored as methicillin; (iii) 422

VOL. 1, 1972 IDENTIFICATION OF CEPHALOSPORIN-RESISTANT S. AUREUS 423 cephaloridine (Kefpor, Eli Lilly & Co.), stored as methicillin; (iv) cephalexin (Cephalexin, Glaxo), stored as methicillin but in samples of 0.01 g/ml. Susceptibility tests. (i) The plate dilution test was carried out as follows. A wire loop was dipped into 10 colonies from an overnight blood-agar plate and used to inoculate 10 ml of broth. After 18 hr at 37 C on a shaking machine, 0.1-ml portions of the undiluted cultures or of 10-fold dilutions in nutrient broth were spread onto nutrient agar plates containing serial dilutions of antibiotic. The results were registered after 24 and 48 hr at 30 or 37 C. (ii) The paper disc test was performed by the method of Ericsson et al. (6). Inocula of 106, 10, or 101 bacteria/ml prepared from 20 to 25 colonies were flooded over the plate. Viable count was made of the inoculum for each experiment. Bacteria at 106 ml gave dense but confluent growth. The plates were incubated at 37 or 30 C with cephalothin and cephalexin discs of 15 and 30,g and methicillin discs of 10 Ag each (Biodisk, Sweden). Since these experiments were performed, international and Swedish recoendations about disc content and upper limits of susceptibility have appeared (6). Zone sizes were recorded after 24 hr and were interpreted according to internationally recoended regression curves as reported by Ericsson and Sherris (6) and as shown in Table 1. The regression curve for cephalothin was y = -2.9 x + 52.9 where y is size in millimeters and x is 2log MIC. Penicillinase was assayed as described by Perret (16). RESULTS MIC values and heteroresistance to cephalosporins of methicillin-resistant S. aureus determined with the plate dilution method. When tested for cephalosporin resistance, all 84 methicillinresistant strains grew in the presence of 32,g of cephalothin or cephalexin per ml and all but 7 TABLE 1. Intterniational and Swedish recoendations of disc conztent and upper limits of susceptibility Antibiotic Disc MIC, upper limit (ug/ml) content (ug/ml) Group I Group II Group III Methicillin International 10 2 -a Swedish 10 2 -a -a (10 )6 Cephalothin International 10 4 32 128 Swedish 30 2 16 128 (24 ) (15 ) (9 ) Cephalexin International 10 Swedish 30 2 16 128 (25 ) (15 ) (6 ) 4 The agent not recoended for use ini this group. h Growth at 30 C. grew at 32,ug of cephaloridine per ml. These strains, however, grow at 16,g/ml. Twenty-five out of the 84, with at least one strain from each represented laboratory, were further studied with regard to heteroresistance to cephalothin, cephaloridine, cephalexin, and methicillin. Heteroresistance was expressed as the ratio between the number of colonies growing at various concentrations of antibiotic in the medium and the total number of colonies growing without antibiotic. As this part of the study was performed before the international recoendations, the substances were diluted 12.5:25:50 instead of 16:32:64. A varying degree of heteroresistance was documented for all the strains tested (Table 2). For cephalothin, methicillin, and cephalexin, there was a decreasing proportion of resistant organisms with increasing concentration of antibiotic. The MIC values were at 100,ug/ml or more except for two strains, which did not grow at 100 Ag of cephalothin per ml. Cephaloridine turned out to be most effective. As for the median strain, a minority of bacteria grew at 25,g/ml but not at 50 jug/ml. All strains grew in the presence of 12.5 Ag/ml. A final MIC for cephaloridine was, however, difficult to obtain for many of the strains. At 50,ug/ml, for example, there was often an almost confluent growth of microcolonies with the heaviest inoculum, whereas a 1: 10 dilution of the inoculum resulted in no growth. To be recorded as "growth" on medium with cephaloridine at a certain concentration of the agent, 100 colonies or less were required on each plate. This inoculum effect may well be due to the formation of penicillinase (2). Zone sizes and MIC values for cephalosporins given by the paper disc method. Figure 1 presents the inhibition s of 84 cephalosporin-resistant strains in the disc diffusion test performed as recoended by Ericsson and Sherris (6), with Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco) containing 5% sheep blood, an inoculum of 106 bacteria/ml, and 30-,ug discs of cephalothin and cephalexin. The plates were incubated at 30 C, and they were read TABLE 2. Heteroresistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin antd various cephalosporinis; median of 25 strains (for cephalexin, median of 17) Antibiotic No. of colonies growing at various concn of antibiotic in the medium (Ag/ml)/no. of colonies growing without antibiotic 12.5 25 50 100 Methicillin. 1/10 1/10 1/10 1/10 Cephaloridine.. 1/105 l/107 0 0 Cephalothin. 1/10 1/10 1/103 1/106 Cephalexin. 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/10

424 HALLANDER AND LAURELL ANTIMICROB. AG. CHEMOTHER. 12 6Number of strains II Cephalotindiscs 30 mcg M.H. DIFCO, 300.Ln 0 22 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 o 2 4 68 0 12 14 16 8 20 22 24 26 2 30 32 c3 Cephalexin,andmindiscshi0 mcg, M.H. DIFCO 30 b a 2 4 6 a lo 12 14 10 18 20 22 ~24 26 20 30 3 2 recorded as susceptible with cephalothin discs and 16 jig/ml as upper limit (Fig. 2). Corresponding figures with cephalexin discs were two (2 %). All but six of the strains grew up to the cephalexin disc, giving no inhibition at all. For methicillin, 42 of the 84 strains were recognized as susceptible compared with three at 30 C. Influence of incubation time. As longer incubation increases the chance for resistant microcolonies to appear, the plates were read again after 48 hr. The number of strains recognized as Group I or II at 30 C was reduced from 22 to 11 with the Swedish and from 41 to 26 with the international recoendations. Influence of medium. According to recoendations by the World Health Organization group, Mueller-Hinton medium with 5% defibrinated sheep blood was used throughout this study. There was no significant difference of results on Difco Mueller-Hinton and BBL Mueller-Hinton medium. When blood was excluded there was, however, a tendency towards larger s around the cephalothin discs, 42% of the investigated strains giving s of 30 or more at 30 C and 24 hr. For cephalexin, on the other hand, the results were not significantly influenced by the exclusion of blood. ciphalexin, detrcimeinedi with mcgjmtg discs. Wth Number of strains I Cephalotindiscs, 30 mcg M.H. DIFCO, 370 cephalothin discs, microcolonies coonly appeared as an inner. Zone measurement was always made within these colonies, but this phenomenon sometimes caused difficulties in estimating limits. According to the regression curve of Ericsson, 16 ytg of cephalothin per ml as the upper limit of susceptibility should correspond to 15 and 32,ug/ml to 12. With cephalothin discs, 22 of the 84 strains (26%) would have been categorized as Group I or II if the Swedish recoendations were used (MIC 2 and 2 16ug/ml, respectively) and 41 (49%) if the international recoendations were used (MIC < 4 and 32,ug/ml, respectively). With cephalexin discs, on the other hand, heteroresistance was detected for all strains. Only one strain gave a measurable of 8. Influence of incubation temperature. When the plates were incubated at 37 C instead of 30 C, 70 of the strains (83%) should have been falsely 0 2 4 6 8 20 '2 14 6 l8 22 2 24 26 28 30 32 zon one 78 IIE Cephalexindiscs, 30 mcg, M.H. DIFCO, 37 10 0 4 21j1 O24 6 8 10 12 14 '6 '8 2 2 4 26 28 3 0 3 2 In -.. Metheti ci 11 in di s cs,i1o m cg, M H - I - - 1 D FC o, 3 7 ' 1:7 0 8 0 2 14668 20 23 26 28 28 0 362 2 FIC;. 2. Same a1s Fig. I bhlt iolciibationz at 37 C.

VOL. 1, 1972 IDENTIFICATION OF CEPHALOSPORIN-RESISTANT S. AUREUS Influence of disc content. Discs containing 15,ug of cephalothin and cephalexin, respectively, gave results comparable with 30-,ug discs. A large number of strains were recorded as susceptible. As no regression curves were given by the manufacturer, the difference could not be analyzed in more detail. MIC values to cephalosporins of 49 methicillinsusceptible S. aureus determined with the plate dilution method. The effect of various cephalosporins on methicillin-susceptible strains is shown in Table 3. Cephalothin was most effective with MIC values below 2 uig/ml for the great majority of strains. Only one grew at 2,ug/ml. For cephaloridine, on the other hand, MIC values of 2 Ag! ml or more were recorded for 13 strains, all penicillinase producers. This is in contrast to the results with methicillin-resistant strains, which are all penicillinase producers but were more TABLE 3. MIC values of various cephalosporins for 49 strains of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Antibi otic MIC at < 2 Ag/ml 2-8 jg/ml > 16 ug/ml Cephalothin 48 1 0 Cephaloridine 36 12 1 Cephalexin 6 24 19 425 susceptible to cephaloridine. To cephalexin only 30 of the 49 strains were recorded as susceptible or fairly susceptible to cephalexin according to the Swedish recoendations. Zone sizes for cephalexin given by the paper disc method. As cephalexin evidently offered the greatest chance to detect staphylococcal heteroresistance to cephalosporins, it was of interest to study the cephalexin s with cephalosporinsusceptible strains as a control. Therefore, the 49 strains were analyzed under the same conditions as given for the results in Fig. 1, with the exception that no blood was added to the medium. As seen in Fig. 3, there was a range between 20 and 35. The s for cephalothin were 30 or more for all strains. DISCUSSION The results of this report support the suggestion of a close association between methicillin and cephalosporin resistance in S. aureus, with heteroresistance as a typical trait. The strains used represent 16 laboratories in 8 different countries. For methicillin, an MIC of 2 pg/ml has been recoended as limit for presuming heteroresistance in S. aureus. Susceptibility is recorded as resistant or sensitive (6). Our results indicate that similar recoendations should be given for cephalosporins. If cephalothin were to be used as prototype agent, the same limit could probably be used. In M.H. DIFCO without blod Cephalotindisc, 30 mcg,306,m.h. DIFCO, without blod 10 2 n 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 26 30 Inhibition s for 49 methicillin-susceptible strains with cephalothin and cephalexin discs after incuba- FIG. 3. tion at 30 C on Mueller-Hinton agar without blood. flbin rinn 32 34 36 36 40 42

426 HALLANDER AND LAURELL ANTIMICROB. AG. CHEMOTHER. the plate dilution test, all methicillin-susceptible strains were inhibited by 2.gg/ml or less, whereas all resistant strains grew in the presence of 32 Aggml. Cephalothin is, however, not ideal, as many resistant cultures will give s falsely indicating susceptibility in the disc diffusion test. This problem was further exaggerated when blood was excluded from the medium. With cephalexin, MIC values of 16 Aggml or more in plate dilution were recorded for many of the methicillin-sensitive S. aureus strains. On the other hand, more clear-cut results were obtained in the paper disc method with s of 20 or more for sensitive and no or small s for resistant ones. These results were not significantly influenced whether blood was present or not in the medium. As the detection of heteroresistance is probably of primary importance, cephalexin is recoended as prototype cephalosporin. No discs were coercially available for cephaloridine. However, this drug was the most active on cephalosporin- or methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains which were all penicillinasepositive, but it was less effective than cephalothin on penicillinase-producing methicillin-susceptible strains. From a practical point of view, incubation time and temperature turned out to be essential, whereas disc content or manufacturer of Mueller- Hinton agar seemed to be of less importance. Whether the laboratory findings are applicable to in vivo conditions cannot be fully evaluated. It is true that intermittent administration of 3 g of cephalothin every 6 hr may give serum peaks of 200,ug/ml and that some of the resistant strains tested did not grow at 100 jg/ml. In vitro, however, organisms with higher resistance are easily selected in the presence of cephalosporin. Literature is controversial on this point. Although Eriksen (7) found methicillin-resistant strains resistant to cephalexin in vitro, he stated that "cephalexin as well as other cephalosporins can be expected to have a clinical effect on methicillin-resistant staphylococci." Kayser (11), on the other hand, thinks "it is impossible to decide which in vitro conditions are relevant. Therefore, methicillinresistant staphylococci should be regarded as resistant to all penicillins and cephalosporins." Chabbert (3) reported clinical failure of high-dose treatment with methicillin and cephalothin in heteroresistant strains. LIT'ERATURE CI'I'ED 1. Annear, D. 1. 1968. The effect of temlperaiture on resistance of StaphylococcuLs aireus to methicillini and some other antibiotics. Med. J. Aust. 1:444-446. 2. Benner, E. J., J. S. Brodie, aind W. M. M. Kirby. 1966. Laboratory and clinicatl comparison of cephaloridine and cephalothin. Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 1965, p. 888-893. 3. Chabbert, Y. A., J. F. Acar-, and P. Courvalin. 1971. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcemina: bacteriological faiilure of treatment with cephalosporins. Antimicr-ob. Ag. Chemother. 1970, p. 280--285. 4. DornbuLsch, K. 1971. Genetic aspects of methicillin resistanec and toxin production in a strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Ann. N.Y. Acatd. Sci. 182:91-97. 5. Dornbusch, K., H. 0. Hallander., and F. Ldfqluist. 1969. Extrachromosomal control of imiethicillin resistance and toxin production in Staphylococcus atiureus. J. Bacteriol. 98:351-358. 6. Ericsson, H. M., aind J. C. Sherris. 1971. Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of all international collaborative study. Acta Paithol. Microbiol. Sciand. Sec. B, Suppl. 217. 7. Eriksen, K. R. cus aureus. 1971. The action Symiiposium of cephalexin on Staphylococ- on cephalexin in cliniical practice. Excerptla Medica. Amsterdainm. 8. Eykyn, S. 1971. Use aind control of cephalosporins. J. Clin. Pathol. 24:419-429. 9. Hallanider, H. O., G. Laurell, and K. Dornbusch. 1969. Determination of imiethicillin-resistanec of Staphylococcus aureus. Heter-ogeneity anid its iniflueclce on the disc diffusion method. Scaind. J. Infec. Dis. 1:169-174. 10. Hewitt, J. H., A. W. Coe, anid M. T. Parker. 1969. The detection of methicilliin resistanlce in Staphylococcus auireus. J. Med. Microbiol. 2:443 456. 11. Kayser, F. H. 1971. In vitro activity of cephalosporin antibiotics against grarm-positive bacteria. Postgrad. Med. J. 47(Suppl.) :14-18. 12. Kayse-, F. H., E. J. Betioner, and P. D. Hoeprich. 1970. Acquired aind native resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to cephalexin and other 0-lactatmi1 antibiotics. Appl. Microbiol. 20:1-5. 13. Kind, A. C., D. G. Kcstle, H. C. Standiford, P. Freetnan, and W. M. M. Kirby. 1969. Development of staphylococci cross-resistant to ccphalexin and imiethicillin. Anitimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 1968. p. 405-409. 14. Michaeli, D., B. Meyers, and L. Weinstein. 1969. In vitro studies of the activity of coumermycin-a, against stapphylococci resistant to methicillin and cephalothini. J. Infec. Dis. 120: 488-490. 15. Parker, M. T., and P. M. Jevonis. 1964. A survey ofrnethicillin resistance itn Staphylococcus aujreus. Postgrad. Med. J. 40 (Suppl.) :1 70. 16. Perret, C. J. 1954. lodometric assay of penicillinase. Nature (London) 174:1012-1013. 17. Smith, I. M. 1971. Cephalospor-in therapy of staphylococcal infections in adults. Postgrad. Med. J. 47(Suppl.) :78-87.