HONR219D Due 3/29/16 Homework VI

Similar documents
Anatomy. Name Section. The Vertebrate Skeleton

Biology 3315 Comparative Vertebrate Morphology Skulls and Visceral Skeletons

AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by

SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR. Nirina O. Ratsimbaholison, Ryan N. Felice, and Patrick M. O connor

Supplementary Information (ZHU and YU: A primitive fish close to the common ancestor of tetrapods and lungfish)

d a Name Vertebrate Evolution - Exam 2 1. (12) Fill in the blanks

Exceptional fossil preservation demonstrates a new mode of axial skeleton elongation in early ray-finned fishes

Phylogeny Reconstruction

ONLINE APPENDIX 1. Morphological phylogenetic characters scored in this paper. See Poe (2004) for

muscles (enhancing biting strength). Possible states: none, one, or two.

PEABODY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT, U.S.A. GLYPTOLEPIS FROM THE MIDDLE DEVONIAN OF SCOTLAND

Postilla PEABODY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT, U.S.A.

2. Skull, total length versus length of the presacral vertebral column: (0); extremely elongated neck (e.g. Tanystropheus longobardicus).

Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy

Mammalogy Laboratory 1 - Mammalian Anatomy

Test one stats. Mean Max 101

Williston, and as there are many fairly good specimens in the American

Mammalogy Lecture 8 - Evolution of Ear Ossicles

A new species of Hsisosuchus (Mesoeucrocodylia) from Dashanpu, Zigong Municipality, Sichuan Province

The cranial osteology of Belebey vegrandis (Parareptilia: Bolosauridae), from the Middle Permian of Russia, and its bearing on reptilian evolution

Geo 302D: Age of Dinosaurs LAB 4: Systematics Part 1

CRANIAL ANATOMY OF ENNATOSAURUS TECTON (SYNAPSIDA: CASEIDAE) FROM THE MIDDLE PERMIAN OF RUSSIA AND THE EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS OF CASEIDAE

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

8/19/2013. Topic 4: The Origin of Tetrapods. Topic 4: The Origin of Tetrapods. The geological time scale. The geological time scale.

Notes on Ceratopsians and Ankylosaurs at the Royal Ontario Museum

New Carnivorous Dinosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia

LABORATORY EXERCISE 6: CLADISTICS I

Fig. 5. (A) Scaling of brain vault size (width measured at the level of anterior squamosal/parietal suture) relative to skull size (measured at the

Biology 340 Comparative Embryology Lecture 12 Dr. Stuart Sumida. Evo-Devo Revisited. Development of the Tetrapod Limb

1/9/2013. Divisions of the Skeleton: Topic 8: Appendicular Skeleton. Appendicular Components. Appendicular Components

complex in cusp pattern. (3) The bones of the coyote skull are thinner, crests sharper and the

The Evolution of the Tetrapod Middle Ear in the Rhipidistian-Amphibian Transition

Cranial osteology of the African gerrhosaurid Angolosaurus skoogi (Squamata; Gerrhosauridae) HOLLY A. NANCE

Skulls & Evolution. 14,000 ya cro-magnon. 300,000 ya Homo sapiens. 2 Ma Homo habilis A. boisei A. robustus A. africanus

A new sauropod from Dashanpu, Zigong Co. Sichuan Province (Abrosaurus dongpoensis gen. et sp. nov.)

THE SKULLS OF ARAEOSCELIS AND CASEA, PERMIAN REPTILES

Comparative Zoology Portfolio Project Assignment

LABORATORY EXERCISE 7: CLADISTICS I

INQUIRY & INVESTIGATION

Lesson 16. References: Chapter 9: Reading for Next Lesson: Chapter 9:

v:ii-ixi, 'i':;iisimvi'\>!i-:: "^ A%'''''-'^-''S.''v.--..V^'E^'-'-^"-t''gi L I E) R.ARY OF THE VERSITY U N I or ILLINOIS REMO

A new carnosaur from Yongchuan County, Sichuan Province

Animal Diversity III: Mollusca and Deuterostomes

Muséum national d Histoire naturelle, F-75005, Paris, France c Karoo Palaeontology, Iziko South African Museum, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000, South

Introduction to Cladistic Analysis

Warm-Up: Fill in the Blank

What are taxonomy, classification, and systematics?

A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF AMERICAN THEROMORPHA

CRANIAL ANATOMY AND PHYLOGENETIC AFFINITIES OF THE PERMIAN PARAREPTILE MACROLETER POEZICUS

4. Premaxilla: Foramen on the lateral surface of the premaxillary body (Yates 2007 ch. 4) 0 absent 1 present

Human Evolution. Lab Exercise 17. Introduction. Contents. Objectives

A M E G H I N I A N A. Revista de la Asociación Paleontológia Argentina. Volume XV September-December 1978 Nos. 3-4

Supporting Online Material for

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Paleontology Commons

Characteristics of a Reptile. Vertebrate animals Lungs Scaly skin Amniotic egg

Modern Evolutionary Classification. Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview Modern Evolutionary Classification

Redescription of the Mongolian Sauropod NEMEGTOSAURUS MONGOLIENSIS Nowinski (Dinosauria:

The skull of Sphenacodon ferocior, and comparisons with other sphenacodontines (Reptilia: Pelycosauria)

Evolution of Tetrapods

Cranial osteology and phylogenetic relationships of Hamadasuchus rebouli (Crocodyliformes: Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Cretaceous of Morocco

Class Reptilia Testudines Squamata Crocodilia Sphenodontia

Tupilakosaurus heilmani Nielsen

Bulletin of Big Bend Paleo-Geo An Open Access Publication from Mosasaur Ranch Museum, Terlingua and Lajitas, Texas All rights reserved

SOME LITTLE-KNOWN FOSSIL LIZARDS FROM THE

OF THE TRIAS THE PHYTOSAURIA

VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA

8/19/2013. Topic 5: The Origin of Amniotes. What are some stem Amniotes? What are some stem Amniotes? The Amniotic Egg. What is an Amniote?

Marshall Digital Scholar. Marshall University. F. Robin O Keefe Marshall University,

Fig Phylogeny & Systematics

Man s Best Friend? Using Animal Bones to Solve an Archaeological Mystery*

CRANIAL OSTEOLOGY OF SCHIZOTHORAICHTHYS NIGER (MECKEL) MISRA (CYPRINIDAE: SCHIZOTHORACINAE). L NEUROCRANIUM

9. Summary & General Discussion CHAPTER 9 SUMMARY & GENERAL DISCUSSION

Supplementary Information for: 3D morphometric analysis of fossil canid skulls contradicts

VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA

Interpreting Evolutionary Trees Honors Integrated Science 4 Name Per.

Lab 2 Skeletons and Locomotion

A New Dromaeosaurid Theropod from Ukhaa Tolgod (Ömnögov, Mongolia)

Chapter 2 Mammalian Origins. Fig. 2-2 Temporal Openings in the Amniotes

Frog Dissection Information Manuel

AMERICAN MUSEUM. Novitates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET

A NEW SPECIES OF TROODONT DINOSAUR FROM THE

Species: Panthera pardus Genus: Panthera Family: Felidae Order: Carnivora Class: Mammalia Phylum: Chordata

The phylogeny and evolutionary history of tyrannosauroid dinosaurs

REVISION OF THE GENUS MARTINICHTHYS, MARINE FISH (TELESOSTEI, TSELFATIIFORMES) FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS OF KANSAS (UNITED STATES)

PALEONTOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Ch 1.2 Determining How Species Are Related.notebook February 06, 2018

NOTES ON THE FIRST SKULL AND JAWS OF RIOJASAURUS INCERTUS (DINOSAURIA, PROSAUROPODA, MELANOROSAURIDAE) OF THE LATE TRIASSIC OF LA RIOJA, ARGENTINA

Fish 2/26/13. Chordates 2. Sharks and Rays (about 470 species) Sharks etc Bony fish. Tetrapods. Osteichthans Lobe fins and lungfish

THE GORGONOPSIAN GENUS, HIPPOSAURUS, AND THE FAMILY ICTIDORHINIDAE * Dr. L.D. Boonstra. Paleontologist, South African Museum, Cape Town

Title: Phylogenetic Methods and Vertebrate Phylogeny

Vertebrate Evolution

Biology 1B Evolution Lecture 11 (March 19, 2010), Insights from the Fossil Record and Evo-Devo

A new deep-bodied Late Permian actinopterygian fish from the Beaufort Group, South Africa

What is the evidence for evolution?

A Fossil Snake (Elaphe vulpina) From A Pliocene Ash Bed In Nebraska

PALEONTOLOGY AND BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF MONGOLIA

Animal Form and Function. Amphibians. United by several distinguishing apomorphies within the Vertebrata

Supplementary Figure 1. Comparisons of the holotypes of Alioramus altai and Qianzhousaurus sinensis illustrating selected features that exhibit a

REVISION OF THE AQUATIC ERYOPID TEMNOSPONDYL GLAUKERPETON AVINOFFI ROMER, 1952, FROM THE UPPER PENNSYLVANIAN OF NORTH AMERICA

A Short Report on the Occurrence of Dilophosaurus from Jinning County, Yunnan Province

Transcription:

Part 1: Yet More Vertebrate Anatomy!!! HONR219D Due 3/29/16 Homework VI Part 1 builds on homework V by examining the skull in even greater detail. We start with the some of the important bones (thankfully few) that you actually need to recognize. We ve already examined the tooth bearing bones, and opercular series. Now let s look at the major bones of the dorsal surface of the dermal skull roof. Pictured are: Osteolepis, a classic aquatic sarcopterygian Panderichthys, an aquatic sarcopterygian with adaptations for shallow water. Ichthyostega, a mostly aquatic sarcopterygian with the ability to come onto land Paleoerpeton, a tetrapod. Some midline skull roof bones are visible in all of them: Parietals, which enclose the parietal foramen (the vertebrate third eye. ) Postparietals, located posterior to the parietals. Tabulars, which form the posterior corners of the skull roof and touch the postparietals. Some skull roof bones are visible only in the fully aquatic ones: Opercular series Extrascapulars bones that attach the pectoral girdle to the skull Others aren t clearly recognizable in Osteolepis but take on identity in some of the others: Frontals anterior to the parietals Nasals anterior to the frontals and near the external nostrils.

1. Judging from the figure above, what changes occur in the relative length of the front and back of the skull during the transition from water to land? 2. Osteolepis and Panderichthys clearly possess an opercular series, and Paleoherpeton clearly does not. Identify, circle, and label the remnant of the opercular series in Ichthyostega. 3. The image at right shows the skull of Protocaptorhinus, a Permian age sauropsid. Identify and label the following elements in at least one each of the drawings: - premaxilla - maxilla - parietals - frontals - nasals For 2 pts extra credit, are postparietals or tabulars present? If you think you see either, label them. Skull openings: There are some of these that all bony vertebrates have: Nares (sing. naris) for the nostrils. Orbits for the eyeballs. These are clearly visible in Protocaptorhinus above. Others only occur in some groups: Supratemporal fenestra paired openings in the skull roof behind the orbits Infratemporal fenestrae paired openings in lateral surface behind the orbits. Antorbital fenestrae openings in the side of the snout Mandibular fenestrae openings in the side of the jaw.

4. The sketch at right by Evan Dahm shows the skull of the dinosaur Allosaurus in an oblique view. In it, identify and label the following: - Naris - Orbit (careful!) - Antorbital fenestra - Supratemporal fenestra - Infratemporal fenestra - Mandibular fenestra These openings may or may not be present in a given vertebrate. If present, they may have combined with other openings or been modified in other ways. Sometimes, their homologies can be truly difficult to decipher. 5. In the image of the skull of the mosasaur Clidastes at right, skull roof bones are white or light gray and internal braincase elements are dark. See how many of the openings discussed in Q 4 you can identify. Which are absent? For 2 pts extra credit, how has one of the openings been significantly modified from its ancestral form (like shown in the example)?

To understand a skull s anatomy, you have to look at it in ventral view. A palatal view shows the skull with the lower jaws removed. For example, the palatal view of Crassigyrinus. This reveals: Ventral edges of the bones of the skull roof. (Like the maxillae and premaxillae.) Midline bones of the braincase Paired bones that from or around the palatoquadrate. (Shaded in.) Two of interest: Pterygoids: (dermal) cover much of the surface of the palate and enclose a midline space that can be narrow or wide. Quadrates: (endochondral) form the knobs to which the lower jaw articulates. Together the palatoquadrate bones and the skull roof enclose subtemporal fenestrae meat-holes through which the muscles that close the jaws pass. In palatal view, one often glimpses the inner surface of the bones of the skull roof through various openings. 6. At right is the palatal view of the early amphibian Nigerpeton. Identify and label its: Quadrates Pterygoids Braincase elements Subtemporal fenestrae Be careful. The exact shapes and proportions of these elements are slightly different than in the example above, but the basic geometry of the skulls is similar.

Part 2: Consensus in cladograms. Now we return to phylogenetic systematic methods to address a problem. Often, a parsimony analysis will identify more than one most parsimonious tree. It frequently happens that there are too many of these to be able to describe or even talk about them all. When that happens, we need a way of presenting a synopsis of the information that they contain. We do this by means of consensus algorithms, whose results are given as consensus trees. In the example above, three trees have identical numbers of steps but tell subtly different stories of evolution. We can t convey all of that information in one cladogram, but we can convey the parts on which the three trees agree, using a consensus tree like the example at right. This tree reflects the facts that: In all the trees, B, C, and D are closely related. A always branches toward the bottom of the tree E shows up all over the place. But the problem: There are different methods for producing these. In the following questions, you will explore them. Strict consensus: If you want to be absolutely rigorous about it, you would use the strict consensus method. A strict consensus tree shows only the monophyletic groups that appear in all of the most parsimonious trees. 7. Your first task is to figure out what those are. So first, identify the monophyletic groups occurring in each tree using the following simple shorthand. Tree one is already done for you: Tree one: (A, B, C, D, E) (B, C, D, E) (C, D, E) (D, E) Tree two: Tree three:

8. Circle or indicate the monophyletic groups that appear in all three trees. Now draw a cladogram showing only the groups that you circled. Anything else must be shown as a polytomy. (If, for example, the only group that the trees had in common were the in-group, you would show A E emerging from a basal polytomy.) Majority Rule consensus: If you are willing to sacrifice a little rigor in order to preserve information, you can use the majority rule consensus. 9. Step one: Refer back to your list of monophyletic groups in question seven. For each one, indicate the percentage of trees in which it was found. (Should be 100%, 67%, or 33% in each case.) 10. List only the monophyletic groups that appear in at least 50% of the trees. Now, draw a consensus tree showing the groups on your list. Next to each node, indicate the percentage of trees in which it occurs. (Hint: You should end up with one polytomy somewhere.) Extra credit 5pts. Was the consensus tree example given above generated using either the strict or majority rule method?