National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Ave, Ft. Collins, CO, , USA

Similar documents
GnRH immunocontraception of male and female white-tailed deer fawns

GONACON (GNRH- HEMOCYANIN CONJUGATE) FORMULATIONS

Wildlife/Livestock Disease Investigations Team (WiLDIT) Brucellosis Research Update

Behavioral observations and physiological implications for white-tailed deer treated with two different immunocontraceptives

Oral fertility control for grey squirrels

Seven years of white-tailed deer immunocontraceptive research at Penn State University: A comparison of two vaccines

Brucellosis and Yellowstone Bison

Factors contributing to the success of a single-shot, multiyear PZP immunocontraceptive vaccine for white-tailed deer

Delivery of GonaCon -Equine to Feral Horses (Equus caballus) Using Prototype Syringe Darts

Reimmunization Increases Contraceptive Effectiveness of GonaCon-Equine Vaccine in Free-Ranging Horses (Equus caballus): Limitations and Side Effects

Fertility control to mitigate humanwildlife conflicts in an overcrowded world : an overview

Efficacy and Health Effects of a Wildlife Immunocontraceptive Vaccine on Fox Squirrels

Reproductive Vaccination- Deciphering the MLV impact on fertility

BISON VACCINATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Long-term fertility control in female cats with GonaCon, a GnRH immunocontraceptive

FERTILITY CONTROL IN URBAN DEER: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Fertility Control for Grey Squirrels : what do the next 5 years look like? Giovanna Massei National Wildlife Management Centre APHA

NIAA Resolutions Bovine Committee

PORCINE ZONA PELLUCIDA IMMUNOCONTRACEPTION OF SOUTHERN WHITE RHINOCEROS IN MANAGED CARE.

TREATMENT OF ANOESTRUS IN DAIRY CATTLE R. W. HEWETSON*

Accidental Exposure to Cattle Brucellosis Vaccines in Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho Veterinarians

Mexican Wolves and Infectious Diseases

NORGESTOMET IMPLANTS ENHANCE EMBRYO SURVIVAL IN POSTPARTUM COWS: A PRELIMINARY REPORT

Could current fertility control methods be effective for landscape-scale management of populations of wild horses (Equus caballus) in Australia?

Luteolysis and Pregnancy Outcomes in Dairy Cows after Treatment with Estrumate or Lutalyse

Revisiting Brucellosis in the Greater Yellowstone Area. Wyoming Brucellosis Coordination Team Meeting April 15, 2015

Effects of a GnRH vaccine on the movement and activity of free-living wild boar (Sus scrofa)

United States Department of Agriculture Marketing and Regulatory Programs Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Veterinary Services

K?3ST~RN STA TES AND PROV1IVCES DEER AND ELK WORKSHOP 5:11-21

Elk Brucellosis Survey and Research Summary

Purebred Cattle Series Synchronization of Estrus in Cattle

Effects of MGA on Prepubertal Beef Heifers

Applying an ecosystem approach to brucellosis control: can an old conflict between wildlife and agriculture be successfully managed?

NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, MARKETS & FOOD Division of Animal Industry 25 Capitol Street 2nd Floor P.O. Box 2042 Concord, NH

ANESTRUS BUFFALO TREATMENT SUCCESS RATE USING GNRH

Pesticide Fact Sheet: Mammalian Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) [GonaCon]

Effect of the GnRH vaccine GonaCon on the fertility, physiology and behaviour of wild boar

Arizona State Laws Affected by H.R. 4879

Elk Brucellosis Surveillance and Reproductive History

Calvin L. Duncan, B.S., Julie L. King, M.S., and Jay F. Kirkpatrick, Ph.D.

Novel Management Methods: Immunocontraception and Other Fertility Control Tools

USING TEST AND SLAUGHTER TO REDUCE PREVALENCE OF BRUCELLOSIS IN ELK ATTENDING FEEDGROUNDS IN THE PINEDALE

Free-Ranging Wildlife. Biological Risk Management for the Interface of Wildlife, Domestic Animals, and Humans. Background Economics

Proceedings, The Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle Workshop, September 5-6, 2002, Manhattan, Kansas

Simulating sterilization, vaccination, and test-and-remove as brucellosis control measures in bison

Review of Fertility Control Research

1 of 18 PA Dept. of Agriculture

Beef Cattle Handbook

ABSTRACT. The effect of exogenous oxytocin injected on different days of estrus cycle and pregnancy on uterine PGF 2a

PHYSIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING SYNCHRONIZATION OF ESTRUS

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

Brucellosis Remote Vaccination Program for Bison in Yellowstone National Park

Targeted Elk Brucellosis Surveillance Project Comprehensive Report

A flexible, reversible alternative to surgical castration

Payback News. Beef Herd Nutrition Challenges

United States Department of the Interior. National Park Service P.O. Box 168 Yellowstone National Park Wyoming ELECTRONIC COPY ONLY

Overview PHYSIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING SYNCHRONIZATION OF ESTRUS

Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD)

A-l. Students shall examine the circulatory and respiratory systems of animals.

UNDERSTANDING FIXED-TIME ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION (FTAI) A GUIDE TO THE BENEFIT OF FTAI IN YOUR HERD DAIRY CATTLE

Board on. A Report of

South Dakota State Laws Affected by H.R I. Food a. None

Experimental tests of nonsurgical reproductive inhibitors to prevent coyote reproduction

and other serological tests in experimentally infected cattle

Brucellosis in Captive Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis) Caused by Brucella abortus Biovar 4

1 of 22 PA Dept. of Agriculture

Georgia Department of Agriculture

Estrumate Prostaglandin in Beef Herds

Michigan State Laws Affected by H.R. 4879

Controlled-release components of PZP contraceptive vaccine extend duration of infertility

Efficacy of SpayVac W as a Contraceptive in Feral Horses

WHY DO DAIRY COWS HAVE REPRODUCTIVE PROBLEMS? HOW CAN WE SOLVE THOSE REPRODUCTIVE PROBLEMS? Jenks S. Britt, DVM 1. Why Manage Reproduction?

Ch. 7 BRUCELLOSIS REGULATIONS CHAPTER 7. BRUCELLOSIS REGULATIONS

Physiological Effects of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Immunocontraception on White-Tailed Deer

Overview. Mike Smith presentation Oct. 8, 2014 ARSBC PHYSIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING SYNCHRONIZATION OF ESTRUS

Maryland State Laws Affected by H.R. 4879

Considerations Related to Heifer Management. Heifer Management CONTROL OF ESTRUS IN HEIFERS

EBA Series FOOTHILL ABORTION UPDATE: PART I: THE TICK

Correlation of. Animal Science Biology & Technology, 3/E, by Dr. Robert Mikesell/ MeeCee Baker, 2011, ISBN 10: ; ISBN 13:

Case Study: Dairy farm reaps benefits from milk analysis technology

MP383 Synchronization of Estrus in Cattle

BSE Update Meat Industry Perspective. Randall Huffman, Ph.D. V.P. Scientific Affairs American Meat Institute Foundation

Kansas Department of Agriculture Division of Animal Health

Estrous Synchronization Systems for Beef Heifers. Bob L. Larson, DVM, PhD, ACT

Effectiveness of a Presynchronization Program Implemented on a Modern Dairy Facility. R. E. Thommen

Arkansas State Laws Affected by H.R. 4879

Alabama D E E R A S S O C I AT I O N

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

Washington State Laws Affected by H.R. 4879

Nebraska State Laws Affected by H.R I. Food a. None. a. None

Indiana State Laws Affected by H.R. 4879

Controlled Breeding Programs for Heifers

Mastitis and the link to infertility

Useful Contacts. Archie Ballantyne Monitor Farmer

REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON BRUCELLOSIS Chair: Marty Zaluski

Colorado State Laws Affected by H.R. 4879

REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON BRUCELLOSIS. Chair: Glenn E. Plumb, Yellowstone Park, WY Vice Chair: Claude E. Barton, Nashville, TN

Vaccination to Improve Reproductive Health. Cow/Calf Meetings. Sandy Stuttgen, DVM UWEX Agriculture Educator, Taylor County

Immunocontrol of reproductive rate of African elephant cows using porcine zona pellucida vaccine on seven private game reserves in South Africa

May 4-6, 2004 University of Arkansas

Transcription:

1 RH: KILLIAN ET AL. Short Communications Observations on the Use of GonaCon TM in Captive Female Elk (Cervus elaphus). Gary Killian, 1,3 Terry J. Kreeger, 2 Jack Rhyan, 1 Kathleen Fagerstone, 1 and Lowell Miller 1 1 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Ave, Ft. Collins, CO, 80521-2154, USA 2 Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 2362 Highway 34, Wheatland, WY 82201, USA 3 Corresponding author: Gary Killian USDA-APHIS-WS 7225 Las Vistas Drive Las Cruces, NM 88005 Email: garykillian@gmail.com 575 636-3151 1

2 Abstract: Overabundant populations of elk (Cervus elaphus) raise concern in the western United States because of habitat damage and transmission of Brucella abortus. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contraceptive efficacy of a single-dose GnRH vaccine (GonaCon TM ) in female elk. For females given 1,000 µg GonaCon TM the percentages that were pregnant for 2005, 2006 and 2007were 14%, 10% and 0% respectively, compared to 10%, 0% and 0% for females given 2,000 µg GonaCon TM and 77%, 75%, and 100% for controls. Key words: elk, Cervus elaphus, GnRH vaccine, GonaCon TM, immunocontraception In previous studies, we demonstrated that the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) vaccine, GonaCon TM is highly effective for preventing pregnancy in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and other species (Miller et al., 2008). Nevada mustangs (Equus caballus; Killian et al., 2004; 2006a), domestic and feral swine (Sus scrofa; Miller et al., 2003; Killian et al., 2006b), bison (Bison bison; Miller et al., 2004a.) as well as several other species (Levy et al., 2004; Miller et al., 2004b; Nash et al., 2004). In female deer and horses, a single intramuscular injection of GonaCon TM was effective for up to 5 years (Killian et al., 2006a). GonaCon TM stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies against GnRH, a small peptide protein produced by the hypothalamus. When sufficient antibody is present, the antibody complexes with and inactivates GnRH, and prevents it from stimulating reproductive hormone and gamete production until the antibody titer declines to an ineffective level. In safety and toxicity studies with female white-tailed deer, GonaCon TM had no adverse effects based on blood chemistry, post mortem and histopathology evaluations (Killian et al., 2006c). Contraceptive vaccines can be used as a tool to manage overabundant wildlife populations where lethal means of management are not possible or feasible (Fagerstone et al., 2002), such as in national parks or urban or suburban areas. Miller et al. (2004a) and Killian et al. (2006) introduced the concept that brucellosis transmission could be limited by preventing 2

3 pregnancy in conjunction with a Brucella vaccination campaign in bison and feral swine. Contraception could prevent pregnancy, and thus abortion, of Brucella-infected elk until they cleared the bacteria. We undertook the present study to evaluate the contraceptive efficacy of two doses of GonaCon TM, given as a single injection to captive female elk. The study was conducted at the Sybille Wildlife Research Unit of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department (Wheatland, Wyoming, USA; 41º 45.778' N, 105º 22.605' W) from 2004-2007. In February 2002, female elk calves were captured in corral traps at the National Elk Refuge (Jackson, Wyoming, USA) and transported to Sybille. There, elk were housed in 0.4-ha corrals and fed alfalfa hay supplemented with a pelleted ration. Water and a trace mineral block were provided ad libitum. Chronic wasting disease has existed in the Sybille facility for over 15 years and captive cervids often contract the disease, probably from a contaminated environment (Miller et al., 2004c). The GonaCon TM vaccine consisted of GnRH peptide conjugated to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH; Miller et al.,2004b, 2008) made into an emulsion with AdjuVac TM adjuvant (Pocatello Supply Depot, Pocatello, Idaho USA). In September 2004, 12 females received a 1 ml injection of 1,000 µg GonaCon TM, 10 females received a 1 ml injection of 2,000 µg GonaCon TM, 13 control females received a 1 ml injection of the adjuvant-buffer emulsion, and two control cows were untreated. All elk were intermingled at random with 1-3 per pen so that there would not be a pen effect. Intramuscular injections were delivered remotely by darts equipped with biodegradable barbs (Pneu-Dart, Inc., Williamsport, Pennsylvania USA). At the beginning of November 2004, 2005, and 2006 females were grouped with males for breeding. Males were exchanged among the females groups every other week for three months to maximize conception. Blood samples were collected in February or March of 2005, 3

4 2006 and 2007 from the jugular vein while females were restrained in a chute. After clotting, the serum was harvested by centrifugation and kept stored frozen at -20C until assay. Serum was used to determine antibody titers to GnRH and progesterone concentration using methods described elsewhere (Miller et al., 2000, 2004b). Assays for pregnancy specific protein B were performed by BioTracking (Moscow, Idaho USA). Their data are reported as either pregnant or not pregnant based on an internal cutoff set by the Bio-Tracking. Significant differences among treatments and controls for percentages pregnant were determined by Chi Square. Differences between treatments for antibody titers and serum progesterone concentrations were determined by Students T test. Antibody titers for females treated with 1,000 µg of GonaCon TM averaged 1.04 x 10 5 five months after the immunization. Average titers were maintained for the 1,000 µg group at.78 and.85 x 10 5 in 2006 and 2007 respectively. Females receiving the 2,000 µg dose of GonaCon TM had an average titer of 1.29 x 10 5 in 2005 which was less (P = 0.016) than the average titers of 1.48 and 1.44 x 10 5 in 2006 and 2007. These data suggest that there may be an advantage of using the 2,000 µg dose of GonaCon TM over the 1,000 µg dose to provide significantly greater titers. Compared to the control animals, both doses of the GonaCon TM vaccine were highly effective in preventing pregnancy in elk during the three year study (P < 0.0001). Annual pregnancy rates were greatest in the control animals where 77% (11/15), 75% (6/8) and 100% (6/6) were pregnant in 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively. In contrast, 8% (1/12), 10% (1/10), and 0% (0/8) were pregnant in the group receiving 1,000 µg of GonaCon TM and 10% (1/10), 0% (0/8), and 0% (0/6) were infertile in the group receiving the 2,000 µg dose of GonaCon TM. 4

5 Although antibody titers were greater in females treated with the 2,000 µg dose of GonaCon TM, there was no difference in rates of pregnancy between the 1,000 µg and 2,000 µg GonaCon TM groups (P = 0.697) over the three breeding seasons studied. This outcome could change in future years if there is a greater decline in titers for the 1,000 µg group compared to the 2,000 µg group. Taken together, these results suggested that a single injection of either dose of GonaCon TM could be used for elk herds where population management by non-lethal means is desired. Although some progesterone is secreted during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle, maximal serum concentrations of progesterone are produced by the corpus luteum during pregnancy. Control animals, most of which were pregnant when the blood samples were taken in February or March, had greater average concentrations of serum progesterone (P < 0.0001) than cows treated with GonaCon TM. A challenge in managing elk in the GYA is that most herd sizes are over management objectives. Because GonaCon TM significantly reduced pregnancies for three breeding seasons, we suggest that it may prove useful in infected elk herds on winter feedgrounds in the GYA by reducing pregnancies and thereby reducing exposure to B. abortus. Of the 37 females which began the study in the fall of 2004, only 20 were alive when blood samples were taken in April of 2007. The cause of death in every instance was CWD, diagnosed by immunohistochemistry. Despite these animal losses, results of this study indicated that both doses of GonaCon TM were effective in preventing pregnancy of elk for at least three years. We conclude that GonaCon use for population management of elk warrants further investigation as part of strategies to control overabundant populations and potentially the diseases associated with these high density populations. 5

6 Literature cited CHEVILLE, N. F., D. R. MCCULLOUGH, AND L. R. PAULSON. 1998. Brucellosis in the Greater Yellowstone Area. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C. 186 pp. GIONFRIDDO, J. P. 2006. Field test of GonaCon TM immunocontraceptive vaccine in free-ranging whitetailed deer. Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings 22: 78-81. FAGERSTONE, K. A., COFFEY, M.A., CURTIS, P.D., DOLBEER, R.A., KILLIAN, G.J., MILLER, L.A. AND WILMOT, L.M. 2002 Wildlife Fertility Control. Wildlife Society Technical Review. 02-2, 29 pp. KILLIAN, G., L A. MILLER, N. K. DIEHL, J. RHYAN, AND D. THAIN. 2004. Evaluation of three contraceptive approaches for population control of wild horses. Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings 21: 263-268., D. WAGNER, AND L. MILLER. 2005. Observations on the use of the GnRH vaccine GonaCon in male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Wildlife Damage Management Conference 11:256-263., L. A. MILLER, N. K. DIEHL, J. RHYAN, AND D. THAIN. 2006a. Long-term efficacy of three contraceptive approaches for population control of wild horses. Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings 22: 67-71.,, J. RHYAN, AND H. DOTEN. 2006b. Immunocontraception of Florida feral swine with a single-dose GnRH vaccine. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 55: 378-384., J. D. EISEMANN, K. J. SULLIVAN, R. S. HEALEY, AND L. A. MILLER. 2006c. Safety and toxicity evaluation of GonaConTM immunocontraceptive vaccine in whitetailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings 22:82-87. KREEGER, T. J. (ed.). 2002. Brucellosis in elk and bison in the Greater Yellowstone Area. Greater Yellowstone Interagency Brucellosis Committee, Jackson, Wyoming, 171 pp., AND S. OLSEN. 2002. Brucellosis vaccination in elk. In Kreeger, T. J. (ed.). Brucellosis in elk and bison in the Greater Yellowstone Area. Greater Yellowstone Interagency Brucellosis Committee, Jackson, Wyoming, pp. 43-50. LEVY, J. K, L. A. MILLER, C. CRAWFORD, M. K. ROSS, K.A. FAGERSTONE, AND H.L. JORDAN. 2004. GnRH immunocontraception of male cats. Theriogenology 62: 1116-1130. Miller, L.A., B.E. Johns and G.J. Killian. 2000. Immunocontraception of White-tailed deer with GnRH vaccine. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 44(5) 266-274., J. RHYAN, AND G. KILLIAN. 2003. Evaluation of GnRH contraceptive vaccine using domestic swine as a model for feral hogs. Proceedings of the Wildlife Damage Management Conference 10: 120-127.,, AND M. DREW. 2004a. Contraception of bison by GnRH vaccine: A possible means of decreasing transmission of brucellosis in bison. Journal of Wildlife Disease 40: 725-730.,, AND G. KILLIAN. 2004b. GonaCon TM : A versatile GnRH contraceptive for a large variety of pest animal problems. Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings 21:269-273., K. FAGERSTONE, J. RHYAN, AND G. J. KILLIAN. 2008. The single shot GnRH 6

7 immunocontraceptive vaccine (GonaCon TM ) in white-tailed deer: comparison of several GnRH preparations. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. In Press. MILLER, M. W., E. S. WILLIAMS, N. T. HOBBS, AND L. L. WOLFE. 2004c. Environmental sources of prion transmission in mule deer. Emerging Infectious Diseases 10: 1003-1006. NASH, P. B., D. K. JAMES, L. HUI, AND L. A. MILLER. 2004. Fertility control of California ground squirrels using GnRH immunocontraception. Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings 21: 274-278. 7