VETERINARSKI ARHIV 86 (2), , 2016

Similar documents
There are two international organisations that set up guidelines and interpretive breakpoints for bacteriology and susceptibility

Lab Exercise: Antibiotics- Evaluation using Kirby Bauer method.

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Background and Plan of Analysis

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in Australian pigs and chickens

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(8):

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Common Bacterial Pathogens in Canine Urinary Tract Infections

Performance Information. Vet use only

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Project Summary. Impact of Feeding Neomycin on the Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance in E. coli O157:H7 and Commensal Organisms

DANMAP Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

Antibiotics: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Slides made by Special consultant Henrik Hasman Statens Serum Institut

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

56 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. All rights reserved.

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

ARCH-Vet. Summary 2013

GeNei TM. Antibiotic Sensitivity. Teaching Kit Manual KT Revision No.: Bangalore Genei, 2007 Bangalore Genei, 2007

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

Animal Antibiotic Use and Public Health

Objectives. Antibiotics uses in food animals 3/25/2018. California Dairy Productions. Antimicrobial Resistance in the Animal Production Environment

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Detection of Methicillin Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Using Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods in a Tertiary Care Hospital

BACTERIOLOGICALL STUDY OF MICROORGANISMS ON MOBILES AND STETHOSCOPES USED BY HEALTH CARE WORKERS IN EMERGENCY AND ICU S

Original Article. Hossein Khalili a*, Rasool Soltani b, Sorrosh Negahban c, Alireza Abdollahi d and Keirollah Gholami e.

Prevalence and Drug Resistance Patterns of Staphylococcus Aureus in Lactating Dairy Cow s Milk in Wolayta Sodo, Ethiopia

QUICK REFERENCE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.)

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

What s new in EUCAST methods?

Chapter 2. Disk diffusion method

Q1. (a) Clostridium difficile is a bacterium that is present in the gut of up to 3% of healthy adults and 66% of healthy infants.

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

Main objectives of the EURL EQAS s

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY PATTERN OF YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA ISOLATED FROM MILK AND DAIRY PRODUCTS*

Antibiotics. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/18/2017

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

RESISTANCE OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS TO VANCOMYCIN IN ZARQA, JORDAN

Microbiology : antimicrobial drugs. Sheet 11. Ali abualhija

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

Defining Resistance and Susceptibility: What S, I, and R Mean to You

Bacterial Pathogens in Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern from a Teaching Hospital, Bengaluru, India

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

VETERINARSKI ARHIV 81 (1), 91-97, 2011

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Principles of Antimicrobial Therapy

Antimicrobials & Resistance

Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter EURL AR activities in framework of the new EU regulation Lina Cavaco

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on Belgian pig farms

Antibiotic susceptibility of different lactic acid bacteria strains

MRSA surveillance 2014: Poultry

Volume-7, Issue-2, April-June-2016 Coden IJABFP-CAS-USA Received: 5 th Mar 2016 Revised: 11 th April 2016 Accepted: 13 th April 2016 Research article

Selective toxicity. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/17/2016

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

CROATIA TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

ESCHERICHIA COLI RESISTANCE AND GUT MICROBIOTA PROFILE IN PIGS RAISED WITH DIFFERENT ANTIMICROBIAL ADMINISTRATION IN FEED

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

SMART WORKFLOW SOLUTIONS Introducing DxM MicroScan WalkAway System* ...

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

Brief reports. Heat stability of the antimicrobial activity of sixty-two antibacterial agents

Detection and Quantitation of the Etiologic Agents of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Endotracheal Tube Aspirates From Patients in Iran

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN COMMENSAL E. COLI FROM LIVESTOCK IN BELGIUM: Veterinary Epidemiology

Evaluation of the BIOGRAM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test System

University Ss Cyril and Methodius in Skopje Faculty of veterinary medicine-skopje

Proceedings of the 19th American Academy of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics Biennial Symposium

Cipro for gram positive cocci in urine

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Quality Control Testing with the Disk Antibiotic Susceptibility Test of Bauer-Kirby-Sherris-Turck

CHARACTERIZATION AND ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERNS OF CATALASE-NEGATIVE GRAM-POSITIVE COCCI ISOLATED FROM BOVINE MASTITIS IN BRAZIL

Comparison of tablets and paper discs for antibiotic sensitivity testing

Antibiotic resistance of bacteria along the food chain: A global challenge for food safety

This document is protected by international copyright laws.

Tel: Fax:

Antimicrobial Resistance: Do we know everything? Dr. Sid Thakur Assistant Professor Swine Health & Production CVM, NCSU

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

CRISPR Diversity and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Salmonella Isolates from Dairy Farm Environments in Texas

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE LEVEL IN STAPHYLOCOCCUS SPP. STRAINS ISOLATED FROM DOGS WITH OTITIS EXTERNA

VLLM0421c Medical Microbiology I, practical sessions. Protocol to topic J05

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella, 2016

Antimicrobial use in poultry: Emerging public health problem

Short Report. R Boot. Keywords: Bacteria, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, quality, diagnostic laboratories, proficiency testing

Campylobacter infections in EU/EEA and related AMR

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Lincomycin (as Lincomycin hydrochloride) Neomycin (as Neomycin sulphate) Excipients Disodium edetate

Exploring simvastatin, an antihyperlipidemic drug, as a potential topical antibacterial agent

Antibiotics & Resistance

Transcription:

. VETERINARSKI ARHIV 86 (2), 163-172, 2016 Antimicrobial susceptibility of milk bacteria from healthy and drug-treated cow udder Nevijo Zdolec 1 *, Vesna Dobranić 1, Ivan Butković 2, Ana Koturić 2, Ivana Filipović 1, and Vinko Medvid 3 1 Department of Hygiene, Technology and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia 2 students, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia 3 Veterinary Station d.o.o., Zaprešić, Croatia ZDOLEC,, N., V. DOBRANIĆ, I. BUTKOVIĆ, A. KOTURIĆ, I. FILIPOVIĆ, V. MEDVID: Antimicrobial susceptibility of milk bacteria from healthy and drug- treated cow udder. Vet. arhiv 86, 163-172, 2016. ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of milk microbiota, considering udder health status and drug treatment history. Composite milk samples were taken aseptically from healthy cows without any signs of mastitis (n = 17) and drug-treated cows with cured mastitis (n = 19). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for 56 enterococci, 30 Escherichia coli, 24 enterobacteria and 94 staphylococci. Depending on the bacterial group or species, the following antibiotic disks were used: ampicillin, rifampin, chloramphenicol, linezolid, tetracycline, erythromycin, nitrofurantoin, vancomycin, penicillin, trimethoprim, cefoperazone, kanamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, teicoplanin, sulfonamides, levofloxacin, clindamycin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. The occurrence of multiresistant E. coli and staphylococci was significantly higher (P<0.05) in the milk of drug-treated cows. The percentage ratio (drug-treated: healthy udders) of multiresistant E. coli was 56.3:0, enterobacteria 57.14:30 and staphylococci 56.5: 4.8. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the prevalence of multiresistant enterococci in the milk of healthy cows and cows with cured mastitis (87.2:73.7). The high prevalence of resistance in enterococci isolated from milk samples of healthy cows could be the result of animal cohabitation and cross-contamination. Key words: antimicrobial resistance, milk, enterococci, udder health Introduction Antimicrobial resistance is one of the leading public-health issues which is closely related to the interactions of farm animals, farmers, the environment and food of animal *Corresponding author: Assist. Professor Nevijo Zdolec, DVM, PhD, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Department of Hygiene, Technology and Food Safety, Heinzelova 55, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia, Phone +385 1 2390 199, E-mail: nzdolec@vef.hr ISSN 0372-5480 Printed in Croatia 163

origin (GARIPCIN and SEKER, 2015). The connection between primary production at the farm level and food processing is particularly evident in the spread of antimicrobial resistance thorough the agri-food chain (ZDOLEC, 2016). The possibility of resistant organisms of animal origin becoming directly pathogenic to man, or transferring their resistance genes to pathogens of medical importance, is of particular concern (TEUBER, 2001). Due to the intensive use of antibiotics in public health and animal husbandry, antibiotic resistance in pathogens has been an increasing medical problem over the last decades. In addition to the spread of resistant zoonotic foodborne pathogens, there is also a possibility that food-related commensal bacteria or opportunistic pathogens are carriers of resistance genes, and therefore a potential hazard to consumers (SHARMA et al., 2014). With regard to dairy production, the most relevant are resistant mastitis-causing bacteria, such as staphylococci (PAJIĆ et al., 2014; ADEGOKE and OKOH, 2014), or resistant ubiquitous bacteria such as enterococci (GIMÉNEZ PEREIRA, 2005). Their presence in milk intended for human consumption or dairy products could be of public-health relevance. It is well known that coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are the most important bacteria involved in subclinical bovine mastitis, alongside Staphylococcus aureus (KALMUS et al., 2011). Their resistance to antimicrobial agents is common due to the high antibiotic pressure in conventional dairy farming. Usually different CoNS species from bovine milk differ significantly in their phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance profile, which is important for udder health management (SAMPIMON et al., 2011). Enterococci, on the other hand, have only limited clinical importance in dairy farming, but their ubiquitous nature and frequent carriage of resistance genes is a reason for concern. The results of many studies indicate the potential risk of acquired antimicrobial resistance in enterococci, and transfer of mobile genetic material to other bacteria, even in conditions of low antimicrobial pressure (COCCONCELLI et al., 2003). Antimicrobial resistance surveys in dairy production are mostly focused on udder pathogens and milk samples from drug-treated animals. However, it is also important to evaluate the presence of resistant bacteria in regularly collected raw milk samples from clinically healthy animals, in order to assess the potential spread of resistant strains from raw material to dairy products. Hence, the aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of resistant bacteria in milk samples from healthy, drug-untreated cows, which are farmed and milked in the same conditions together with drug-treated cows with cured bacterial mastitis. Materials and methods Milk sampling and microbiological analyses. Composite milk samples (n = 36) were collected from 4 different dairy farms, including both healthy udder milk samples (n = 17) and drug-treated udder milk samples (n = 19), from each farm. Samples from 164 Vet. arhiv 86 (2), 163-172, 2016

drug-treated cows were taken separately, i.e. on different sampling days than samples from healthy cows, in order to avoid potential cross-contamination. At the time of milk sampling the withdrawal period in the drug-treated group had expired. Before sampling, udder sanitation measures were implemented, and milk was taken aseptically in sterile microbiological tubes, stored at 4 C and transported to the laboratory. One ml of milk samples was decimally diluted in sterile salt peptone water to 10-8. Appropriate dilutions were chosen and 0.1 ml or 1 ml was used for staphylococci, Escherichia coli, enterococci and enterobacteria enumeration. Staphylococci were grown on Manitol Salt Phenol-red Agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 48 h at 37 C, E. coli on Rapid E. coli 2 Agar (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) for 24 h at 44 C, enterococci on Compass Enterococcus agar (Biokar Diagnostics, France) for 24 h at 44 C, and enterobacteria on Crystal-Violet Neutral-Red Bile Glucose Agar (Merck, Germany) for 24 h at 37 C. After incubation, colonies were selected for identification (Gram staining, oxidase, catalase, API STREP, API 20E and API Staph tests) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. A total of 56 enterococci (37 from milk of drugtreated udders and 19 from healthy udders), 24 enterobacteria (14 from milk of drugtreated udders and 10 from healthy udders), 30 E. coli and 94 staphylococci isolates (53 milk from drug-treated udders and 41 from healthy udders) were collected for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the disk diffusion method (ANONYMOUS, 2010). The number of tested bacterial isolates does not refer to the number of composite milk samples (n = 36), meaning that several strains of each bacterial group were randomly picked from the agar plates of the corresponding milk sample. Depending on the microbial group or species, the following antimicrobial disks (Bio-Rad, France) were used: ampicillin (10 μg), rifampin (5 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), vancomycin (30 μg), penicillin (10 IU), linezolid (30 μg), trimethoprim (5 μg), cefoperazone (75 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (25 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (10/300 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), sulfonamides (250 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), clindamycin (2 μg) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (30 μg). The bacterial culture (0.5 McFarland) was streaked on Mueller-Hinton agar (Bio-Rad, France) and max. 6 disks were used per plate by means of a disk dispenser (Bio-Rad, France). After incubation (35 C, 18-24 h), the zone diameter was measured and interpreted according to the CLSI document M100-S20. Vancomycin resistance in enterococci was tested by both the agar diffusion method and the E-test (AB BIODISK, biomérieux). Statistical analysis. Proportions of multiresistant bacterial groups and resistance to selected antimicrobial agents were compared using Chi-square test at P<0.05 probability level, by computer software (PREACHER, 2001). Vet. arhiv 86 (2), 163-172, 2016 165

Results The occurrence of multiresistant E. coli and staphylococci was significantly higher (P<0.05) in the milk of drug-treated cows (Table 1). The percentage ratio (drug-treated: healthy udders) of multiresistant E. coli was 56.3:0, enterobacteria 57.14:30 and staphylococci 56.5:4.8. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the prevalence of multiresistant enterobacteria in milk from drug-treated udders and the milk of healthy cows, despite the evidently higher percentage in drug-treated samples. Interestingly, the percentage ratio of multiresistant enterococci in drug-treated udder milk samples and milk from healthy udders was quite similar, 87.2:73.7 % and the difference was not significant (P<0.05). Table 1. Percentage of multiresistant strains related to udder health status and distribution of multiresistance toward antimicrobial agents Microorganisms Multiresistant strains (%) Number of antimicrobial agents Drug- treated udder Healthy udder 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Enterococci 87.2 a 73.7 a Number of resistant strains (healthy udder/drug-treated udder) 2/3 1/1 1/4 6/7 4/10 0/6 0/3 - - - Enterobacteria 57.14 a 30 a 2/2 0/1 1/2 1/1 0/2 0/1 1/1 - - - E. coli 56.3 a 0 b 2/2-0/1 0/1 0/1 - - - 0/2 0/4 Staphylococci 56.6 a 4.8 4.8 b 5/5 1/2 0/6 0/7 1/7 0/3 0/5 - - - a, b - values with different letters in same row are significantly different (P<0.05) In our study, staphylococci isolated from drug-treated udder milk samples were most frequently resistant to clindamycin, penicillin, ampicillin, linezolid and erythromycin. An evidently lower proportion of resistant staphylococci was found in milk samples from healthy udders (Fig. 1) where the most common resistance was found to penicillin (14.6 %), erythromycin and kanamycin (12.2 %). The occurrence of resistance in staphylococci to clindamycin, penicillin, ampicillin, linezolid, teicoplanin, rifampin, tetracycline and erythromycin was significantly higher (P<0.05) in milk samples from drug-treated udders. There was no difference (P>0.05) in the presence of resistance to chloramphenicol, kanamycin or sulphonamides in the staphylococci between the two groups. 166 Vet. arhiv 86 (2), 163-172, 2016

Fig. 1. Percentage of resistant staphylococci depending on the cow udder health status In the present survey, more than 80 % of enterococci strains from drug-treated udders were resistant to penicillin, chloramphenicol and nitrofurantoin. However, the proportion of enterococci resistant to the same antimicrobials from healthy udders ranged from 50-60 % (Fig. 2). No difference in the occurrence of strains resistant to these antimicrobials was found (P<0.05) between healthy and drug-treated udders. Using the agar disk diffusion method, 19 enterococci with intermediate vancomycin zones were found. However, the E-test did not show any MIC above 32 μg/ml indicating the absence of phenotypically vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Fig. 2. Percentage of resistant enterococci depending on the cow udder health status Vet. arhiv 86 (2), 163-172, 2016 167

Four E. coli strains were resistant to 11 antimicrobials, and three enterococci and five staphylococci were resistant to 8 antimicrobial agents. E. coli strains from drugtreated udders were mostly (>50 %) resistant to trimethoprim, streptomycin, tetracycline, sulfonamides and chloramphenicol. Half of the tested E. coli strains from healthy udder milk samples were also resistant to trimethoprim. Enterobacteria isolated from drugtreated udders were mostly resistant to tetracycline, trimethoprim and streptomycin (>40 %), while in healthy-udder isolates the most common was tetracycline resistance (40 %). Gentamicin resistant strains were only isolated from untreated animals. Discussion The presence of milk bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents is known as an important public-health issue and is mainly related to the treatment of mastitis. The aim of the present study was to gain insight into potential risks in terms of the potential occurrence of resistant bacteria in regularly collected milk originating from healthy cows cohabitating with drugtreated cows (with cured mastitis). There is a lack of similar studies performed in raw milk from healthy cows, whereas antimicrobial resistance has been surveyed in milk from mastitic cows with Staphylococcus aureus or CoNS (BENIĆ et al., 2012). JURMANOVIĆ et al. (2012) reported that S. aureus isolates from mastitic cows in Croatia are resistant to β-lactam antibiotics, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, oxytetracyclin, fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides. The results of their 9-year survey showed the increase in resistance of S. aureus (n = 2719) towards kanamycin, neomycin, enrofloxacin, lincomycin and penicillin. More recently, LESKOVEC et al. (2015) reported a significant increase in the resistance of S. aureus from mastitic cows to penicillin, ampicillin, neomycin, streptomycin and tetracycline, compared to previous reports in Croatia (BENIĆ et al., 2003). FREY et al. (2013) reported coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) from mastitic cows mostly resistant to oxacillin (47.0 % of the isolates), fusidic acid (33.8 %), tiamulin (31.9 %), penicillin (23.3 %), tetracycline (15.8 %), streptomycin (9.6 %), erythromycin (7.0 %), sulfonamides (5 %), trimethoprim (4.3 %), clindamycin (3.4 %), kanamycin (2.4 %), and gentamicin (2.4 %). In Croatia, resistance of CoNS was recently evaluated in pasteurizedmilk cheeses, and most strains were resistant to erythromycin (38.46 %), penicillin (23.07 %) and tetracycline (5.12 %), with common multidrug resistance (ZDOLEC et al., 2013). Erythromycin and penicillin resistance were also found to be dominant in staphylococci from raw milk (this study). MIKULÁŠOVÁ et al. (2014) also found high multiresistance in CoNS from Bryndza, a traditional Slovak cheese. Multidrug resistant staphylococci are frequently found in ready-to-eat food, including cheeses (CHAJĘCKA -WIERZCHOWSKA et al., 2014). Considering E. coli resistance patterns, SRINIVASAN et al. (2007) reported that most strains from cow mastitis are resistant to ampicillin (98.4 %) and frequently resistant to streptomycin (40.3 %), sulfisoxazole (34.1 %), and tetracycline (24.8 %). Less than 20 % were resistant to carbenicillin, gentamicin, cephalothin, trimethoprim, 168 Vet. arhiv 86 (2), 163-172, 2016

and amikacin. KALMUS et al. (2011) reported ampicillin, streptomycin and tetracycline resistance among E. coli isolates in 24.3 %, 15.6 % and 13.5 % of cases, respectively. The effect of antibiotic pressure is typically evident in Escherichia, which is presented in our study by the wide multiresistance patterns in strains from drug-treated animals only. Enterococci are a quite controversial food-related microbial group, with both beneficial (food fermentation, production of enterocins) and potentially hazardous characteristics (biogenic amine producers, carriers of antimicrobial resistance genes). In our study, an equal distribution of resistant enterococci was present in both milk samples from healthy cow udders and drug-treated udders (P>0.05). Such a high proportion of resistant enterococci in both cow populations could be the result of animal cohabitation and cross contamination. Vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE), as the clinically most relevant enterococci, were absent in both cow groups, based on E-test results. Similarly, JIMÉNEZ et al. (2013) reported the absence of VRE in ovine, feline, canine, porcine and human milk. The most isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol and tetracycline, and frequently resistant to erythromycin, which is partially presented in our study. Over the last few years, a low occurrence of VRE in raw milk has been reported by other authors (ÇETINKAYA et al., 2013; KROČKO et al., 2011). Dairy products, primarily cheeses, are more frequently positive to VRE strains (FURLANETO-MAIA, 2014). Enterococci of food origin are not a direct cause of resistant enterococci in humans, but they may transfer resistance determinants to human-adapted bacteria (ECONOMOU and GOUSIA 2015). Their frequent presence in raw cow milk collected for human consumption should be considered a potential risk, primarily when milk is consumed without any thermal treatment. Conclusion The presence of bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents in the primary production of milk is a significant public health issue due to the spread of resistance determinants to consumers. It is expected, in the conditions of higher antibiotic pressure, that more (multi) resistant bacteria will be found in animals, milk and the environment. Our study emphasizes another fact: the equal prevalence of resistance in enterococci isolated from milk samples of both healthy and drug-treated cows. Acknowledgements This research was supported by the University of Zagreb, Program Contract 2, in the project: Antimicrobial resistance of pathogens from food of animal origin. Vet. arhiv 86 (2), 163-172, 2016 169

References N. Zdolec et al.: Antimicrobial susceptibility of raw milk bacteria ADEGOKE, A. A., A. I. OKOH (2014): Species diversity and antibiotic resistance properties of Staphylococcus of farm animal origin in Nkonkobe Municipality, South Africa. Folia Microbiol. 59, 133-140. ANONYMOUS (2010): Performance Standards for Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twentieth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S20. Wayne, PA. BENIĆ, M., B. HABRUN, G. KOMPES (2012): Clinical and epidemiological aspects of cow mastitis caused by S. aureus and its methicillin-resistant strains. Rad Hrvatske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti, Medicinske znanosti, Rad 511, 37, 113-122. BENIĆ, M., M. LOJKIĆ, D. MAJNARIĆ, Ž. MIHALJEVIĆ (2003): In vitro sensibility of mastitis causes on antimicrobial substances. Proceedings 4 th Middle East Buiatric Congress, 23-27 April, Lovran, Croatia, pp. 125-130. CHAJĘCKA-WIERZCHOWSKA, W., A. ZADERNOWSKA, B. NALEPA, M. SIERPIŃSKA, L. LANIEWSKA-TROKENHEIM (2014): Retail ready-to-eat food as a potential vehicle for Staphylococcus spp. harboring antibiotic resistance genes. J. Food Protect. 77, 993-998. COCCONCELLI, P. S., D. CATTIVELLI, S. GAZZOLA (2003): Gene transfer of vancomycin and tetracycline resistances among Enterococcus faecalis during cheese and sausage fermentations. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 88, 315-323. ÇETINKAYA, F., T. ELAL MUŞ, G. E. SOYUTEMIZ, R. ÇIBIK (2013): Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in animal originated foods. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 37, 588-593. ECONOMOU, V., P. GOUSIA (2015): Agriculture and food animals as a source of antimicrobialresistant bacteria. Infect. Drug Resist. 8, 49-61. FREY, Y., J. P. RODRIGUEZ, A. THOMANN, S. SCHWENDENER, V. PERRETEN (2013): Genetic characterization of antimicrobial resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci from bovine mastitis milk. J. Dairy Sci. 96, 2247-2257. FURLANETO-MAIA, L., K. R. ROCHA, E. C. HENRIQUE, A. GIAZZI, M. C. FURLANETO (2014): Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus sp. isolated from soft cheese in Southern Brazil. Adv. Microbiol. 4, 175-181. GARIPCIN, M. E. SEKER (2015): Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and farm workers in Turkey. Vet. arhiv 85, 117-129. GIMÉNEZ PEREIRA, M. L. (2005): Enterococci in milk products. M.S. Thesis, Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand. JIMÉNEZ, E., V. LADERO, I. CHICO, A. MALDONADO-BARRAGÁN, M. LÓPEZ, V. MARTÍN, L. FERNÁNDEZ, M. FERNÁNDEZ, M. A. ÁLVAREZ, C. TORRES, J. M. RODRÍGUEZ (2013): Antibiotic resistance, virulence determinants and production of biogenic amines among enterococci from ovine, feline, canine, porcine and human milk. BMC Microbiol. 13:288. JURMANOVIĆ, J., B. BAČANEK, I. PAVLJAK, T. SUKALIĆ, V. JAKI, D. MAJNARIĆ, A. KONČURAT, J. SOKOLOVIĆ (2012): Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus strains 170 Vet. arhiv 86 (2), 163-172, 2016

isolated from bovine intramammary infections to different antimicrobial agents. Rad Hrvatske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti, Medicinske znanosti, Rad 511, 37, 105-110. KALMUS, P., B. AASMÄE, A. KÄRSSIN, T. ORRO, K. KASK (2011): Udder pathogens and their resistance to antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Estonia. Acta Vet. Scand. 53:4. KROČKO, M., M. ČANIGOVÁ, V. DUCKOVÁ, A. ARTIMOVÁ, J. BEZEKOVÁ, J. POSTON (2011): Antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus species isolated from raw foods of animal origin in South West Part of Slovakia. Czech J. Food Sci. 29, 654-659. LESKOVEC, P., D. BENDELJA LJOLJIĆ, M. BENIĆ, A. KOSTELIĆ, Ž. CVETNIĆ, N. ANTUNAC (2015): Sensitivity of selected mastitis pathogens to antimicrobial agents. Mljekarstvo 65, 149-158. MIKULÁŠOVÁ, M., J. VALÁRIKOVÁ, R. DUŠINSKÝ, R. CHOVANOVÁ, A. BELICOVÁ (2014): Multiresistance of Staphylococcus xylosus and Staphylococcus equorum from Slovak Bryndza cheese. Folia Microbiol. 59, 223-227. PAJIĆ, M., Z. RAŠIĆ, B. VELEBIT, S. BOBOŠ, M. MIHAJLOVIĆ-UKROPINA, M. RADINOVIĆ, A. GALFI, J. PETKOVIĆ, S. TROJAČANEC (2014): The prevalence of methicillin resistance and Panton-Valentine leukocidin synthesis genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates of bovine and human origin. Vet. arhiv 84, 205-214. PREACHER, K. J. (2001): Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence (Computer software). Available from http://quantpsy.org SAMPIMON, O. C., T. J. G. M. LAM, D. J. MEVIUS, Y. H. SCHUKKEN, R. N. ZADOKS (2011): Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine milk samples. Vet. Microbiol. 150, 173-179. SHARMA, P., S. K. TOMAR, P. GOSWAMI, V. SANGWAN, R. SINGH (2014): Antibiotic resistance among commercially available probiotics. Food Res. Int. 57, 176-195. SRINIVASAN, V., B. E. GILLESPIE, M. J. LEWIS, L. T. NGUYEN, S. I. HEADRICK, Y. H. SCHUKKEN, S. P. OLIVER (2007): Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolated from dairy cows with mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 124, 319-328. TEUBER, M. (2001): Veterinary use and antimicrobial resistance. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4, 493-499. ZDOLEC, N. (2016): Antimicrobial resistance of fermented food bacteria. In: Fermented Foods, Part I: Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Montet, D., R. C. Ray, Eds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 263-281. ZDOLEC, N., V. DOBRANIĆ, G. ZDOLEC, D. ĐURIČIĆ (2013): Antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci and lactic acid bacteria from industrially produced dairy products. Mljekarstvo 63, 30-35. Received: 23 March 2015 Accepted: 10 December 2015 Vet. arhiv 86 (2), 163-172, 2016 171

ZDOLEC,, N., V. DOBRANIĆ, I. BUTKOVIĆ, A. KOTURIĆ, I. FILIPOVIĆ, V. MEDVID: Osjetljivost na antimikrobne tvari bakterija izdvojenih iz mlijeka zdravih i liječenih vimena krava. Vet. arhiv 86, 163-172, 2016. SAŽETAK Cilj je ovog rada bio istražiti osjetljivost na antimikrobne tvari mikroflore mlijeka s obzirom na zdravstveni status vimena i izloženost antimikrobnim tvarima. Uzorci mlijeka sterilno su uzeti od zdravih krava bez znakova mastitisa (n = 17) i liječenih krava s preboljelim mastitisom (n = 19). Istražena je osjetljivost 56 izolata enterokoka, 30 Escherichia coli, 24 enterobakterija i 94 stafilokoka. Sukladno bakterijskoj vrsti ili skupini, korišteni su diskovi ampicilina, rifampina, kloramfenikola, linezolida, tetraciklina, eritromicina, nitrofurantoina, vankomicina, penicilina, trimetoprima, cefoperazona, kanamicina, trimetoprim/sulfametoksazola, nalidiksične kiseline, ciprofloksacina, gentamicina, teikoplanina, sulfonamida, levofloksacina, klindamicina i amoksicilina s klavulanskom kiselinom. Pojavnost višestruko otpornih izolata E. coli i stafilokoka bila je značajno veća (P<0,05) u mlijeku liječenih krava. Postotni odnos (liječene:zdrave krave) višestruko otpornih izolata E. coli bio je 56,3:0, enterobakterija 57,14:30, te stafilokoka 56,5:4,8. Nije bilo značajne razlike (P>0,05) u pojavnosti rezistencije enterokoka u mlijeku između zdravih i liječenih krava. Visoka učestalost otpornosti na antimikrobne tvari enterokoka u mlijeku zdravih krava može biti posljedica kohabitacije životinja i križnog onečišćenja. Ključne riječi: antimikrobna rezistencija, mlijeko, enterokoki, zdravlje vimena 172 Vet. arhiv 86 (2), 163-172, 2016