Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Similar documents
Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

Genetic parameters for pathogen specific clinical mastitis in Norwegian Red cows

Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Validation of the PathoProof TM Mastitis PCR Assay for Bacterial Identification from Milk Recording Samples

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

Understanding the Basics of Mastitis

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING

Innovation in Mastitis Treatment

A PRACTISING VETS APPROACH TO THE HIGH CELL COUNT HERD

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

MASTITIS PATHOGENS IN MILK OF DAIRY COWS IN SLOVAKIA

Emerging Mastitis Threats on the Dairy Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM Dept. of Dairy Science

IDENTIFICATION OF MASTITIS ETIOLOGIC AGENTS IN LITHUANIAN CATTLE HERDS

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Interpretation of results from milk samples tested for mastitis bacteria with Mastit 4 qpcr test from DNA Diagnostic

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Lincomycin (as Lincomycin hydrochloride) Neomycin (as Neomycin sulphate) Excipients Disodium edetate

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation

Analysis of the microbial population that most often causes mastitis in dairy cows

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

Trouble-Shooting a Mastitis Problem Herd 1

Lactation. Macroscopic Anatomy of the Mammary Gland. Anatomy AS 1124

Options for Handling Mastitis during Lactation in Modern Dairy Farms

Mastitis cows and immunization

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

Sources of Different Mastitis Organisms and Their Control

Subclinical mastitis in small ruminants: prevalence, comparative aspects and prevention

Practical Strategies for Treating Mastitis Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

, Pamela L. Ruegg

Prevention of clinical and subclinical mastitis

Somatic Cell Count as an Indicator of Subclinical Mastitis. Genetic Parameters and Correlations with Clinical Mastitis

Veterinaria.com.pt 2009; Vol. 1 Nº 1: e13 (publicação inicial em Julho de 2008) Disponível em

New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program Fact Sheet Udder Health Herd Goals

Proper Dry-Off Procedures to Prevent New Infections and Cure Existing Cases of Mastitis. Stephen C. Nickerson University of Georgia

Responsible Use of Antimicrobials in Dry Cow Strategies

Bulk Milk Data and Udder Health

Update on Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis. John R. Middleton College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia

Quad Plate User s Manual

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Mastitis: The Canadian Perspective

MILK QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR TRANSITION COWS AND HEIFERS. Leo Timms Iowa State University, Ames IA

Best practice guide for on-farm mastitis control

Mastitis Management and SCC Control in Once a Day Herds. Don Crowley- Teagasc

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

TREATMENT DECISIONS FOR MILD AND MODERATE CASES OF CLINICAL MASTITIS. Carolina Pinzón-Sánchez

Bovine Mastitis: Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus Aureus in Small Holder Herds of Bench Maji Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

MASTITIS AND ITS CONTROL

Milking Management II - Mastitis 1

Improve performances in Dairy farms, an efficient and global hygiene method.

Mastitis what is it?

Evaluation of a new qpcr test to specify reasons behind total bacterial count in bulk tank milk

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

Norwegian mastitis control programme

Mastitis and On-Farm Milk Cultures - A Field Study - Part 1

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2016 Project Report

A Partial Budget Model to Estimate Economic Benefits of Lactational Treatment of Subclinical Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis

USING MANURE SOLIDS AS BEDDING Final Report. CORNELL WASTE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE Ithaca, NY

MICROBIOLOGY of RAW MILK

Selective Antibiotic Treatment for Dairy Cow Mastitis 1

Gina M Pighetti & Raul Almeida. University of Tennessee

Herd Navigator and mastitis management

Association between teat skin colonization and intramammary infections with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae

MSU Extension Publication Archive

Last 2-3 months of lactation

Milking behaviour in dairy cows naturally infected with clinical mastitis

Udder Health in an International Perspective

Registration system in Scandinavian countries - Focus on health and fertility traits. Red Holstein Chairman Karoline Holst

2. BOVINE MASTITIS. Bovine mastitis is a worldwide phenomenon with integrated economic

The organism Infection process Tissue reaction SCC response Prevention Treatment

ISOLATION, IDENTIFICATION AND ANTIBIOTICS TREATMENT OF SOME BACTERIAL STRAINS CAUSED BOVINE MASTITIS IN LIBYA

29/11/2017. Best Milking Practices. Greg Strait- Fulton County Extension Amber Yutzy- Huntingdon County Extension

Efficacy of On-Farm Programs for the Diagnosis and Selective Treatment of Clinical and Subclinical Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

Lactoferrin Concentrations in Milk from Normal and Subclinical Mastitic Cows

cure was 0.79 for ceftiofur-treated cows and 0.76 for control-treated cows, whereas the overall bacteriological

Isolation and identification of major causing bacteria from bovinemastitis R. Lakshmi 1 and K.K. Jayavardhanan 2

Environmental Streptococcal and Coliform Mastitis

RISKS, REALITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH MASTITIS TREATMENTS

Selective Dry Cow Therapy

University of Missouri Extension Using the California Mastitis Test

Transcription:

M6.4. minna.koivula@mtt.fi Pathogen records as a tool to manage udder health Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, 31600 Jokioinen, Finland

Objectives To descripe: new data recording system to be used in udder health management the preliminary results from the collected data

Clinical mastitis (CM) is an inflammation of one or more quarters of the udder, usually caused by bacteria over 100 different micro-organism can cause mastitis most important species are staphylococci, streptococci and coliform bacteria

Mastitis pathogens can be divided: environmental pathogens survive and multiply outside the cow's body eg. in soil and beddings (coliform bacteria) contagious pathogens live in the udder and skin and the infection is normally spread from cow to cow during milking (e.g. S. aureus)

Distribution of mastitis during lactation 1. lactation 2. lactation Frequency (%) of CM 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 25 53 81 109 137 165 193 221 249 277 305 333 361 Days in milk

Lactation curve for somatic cell count (SCC) logscc 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1. lactation 2. lactation 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 Days in milk

Mastitis has remained one of the major diseases in dairy herds causing profound economic losses to whole milk production chain strategies to reduce mastitis are important management practices and genetic selection Only Nordic countries have national health recording system only countries including CM directly into selection objectives of dairy cattle in most countries SCC is used as an indirect selection tool

SCC indicates both resistance and susceptibility of cow to CM CM indicates clinical cases and SCC both clinical and sub-clinical cases indicators of different aspects of udder health

Genetic resistance to different mastitis types may be based on different mechanisms and the resistance to different pathogens may differ between cow families selection for SCC may not affect all pathogens equally Important to estimate the true relationship between mastitis and SCC We need information on pathogen specific mastitis and SCC

Database containing pathogen information on an individual cow basis information can be used on more targeted treatment and breeding programs unique data Reliable pathogen information requires standard bacteriological methods use of animal and herd identifications sampling date

Pathogen records collected from laboratories analysing mastitis milk samples recording practice starts when veterinarians send milk samples from infected cows to laboratories after the analyses, bacteriological results are automatically sent to the database permission for data from milk producers currently data collected only from the largest mastitis laboratories

After the first year of full operation information from about 58 900 milk samples was entered to the database bacteriological information of 27 945 cows from 4867 herds (ca. 1/3 of dairy herds in Finland) according to sampling dates, 81.6 % of cows sampled for bacteriology once, 14.1 % twice, and rest of the animals three or more times 68.8 % of the cows only one quarter was sampled at a time. All four quarters were sampled in 11.0 % of the cases

CNS 21.5 % Staphylococcus aureus 16.2 % Streptococcus uberis 11.9 % Streptococcus dysgalactiae 7.7 % Streptococcus agalactiae 0.2 % Other streptococci 0.8 % Corynebacterium 2.4 % Escherichia coli 3.3 % Other coliform 1.8 % Mixed culture 4.2 % Other bacteria 2.5 % Culture-negative samples 27.8%

The percentage of culture-negative samples was 27.8 % low concentration of pathogens in the milk sample because: the pathogen is either eliminated from the mammary gland (e.g. E. coli) the pathogen has invaded into mammary epithelial (S. aureus) infection caused by virus or other non-bacteria some samples taken also from the non-infected quarters

Percentage of mastitis samples analysed in different months 14 12 10 % 8 6 4 2 0 January February March April May June July August September October November December - Most calvings in winter and early autumn

Season may have influence on the mastitis prevalence of mastitis pathogens varies at different time of year (Chisq=929.02, df=121, p< 0.001)

Proportion of pathogens in different months % 100 % 80 % 60 % 40 % 20 % Coliform Coryneform Str.dysg. Str.uberis Other bacteria S.aureus CNS Culture-negat. 0 % January February March April May June July August September October November December

Prevalence of pathogens was studied in different parts of Finland by dividing Finland into five regions: west, south, central, east and north The prevalence of pathogens differs within and among areas (Chisq=2506.19, df=44, p< 0.001)

Proportion of pathogens in different parts of Finland South Central West East North 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0 % CNS S.aureus Str.agal. Str.dysg. Str.uberis Other str. Coryneform E.coli Other coliform Other infection Culture-negat.

Future plans Pathogen data will be joined together with other recording data genetic parameters for pathogen specific CM and SCC Combining health records, SCC and bacteriological information gives a more effective tool for the udder health program and for the selection of more resistant animals enables the epidemiological study of mastitis