CONSOLIDATION OF DOG ACT. R.S.N.W.T. 1988,c.D-7. (Current to: May 29, 2011)

Similar documents
PLEASE NOTE. authority of the Queen s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law.

R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER D.16

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN BY-LAW NO As Amended by By-law No

WHEREAS, The Municipalities Act, 2005, provides that a Council may by bylaw:

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09

DOGS (JERSEY) LAW 1961

VILLAGE OF ROSEMARY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA BYLAW NO 407/09 And AMENDMENT with BYLAW 428/11

BY-LAW NUMBER WHEREAS The Corporation of the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville has pursuant to The Municipal Act, Section 354 (1), and Part 1

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RAMARA CANINE CONTROL BYLAW NO AS AMENDED BY BYLAWS , AND CONSOLIDATED VERSION

BY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW

BYLAW 837/12 Cat Control Bylaw

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE

Section 2 Interpretation

BERMUDA 2008 : 28 DOGS ACT 2008

ANIMAL CONTROL BY-LAW

TOWN OF COMOX DRAFT CONSOLIDATED BYLAW NO. 1322

BY- LAW 39 of 2008 OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF ST. MARYS

TOWN OF LAKE COWICHAN. Bylaw No

ANIMALS. Chapter 284 DOG - LICENSING - REGULATION CHAPTER INDEX. Article 1 INTERPRETATION. Article 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Be it enacted, by the Council of the Town of Wolfville under the authority of Sections 172 and 175 of the Municipal Government Act, as amended:

A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF LANGHAM TO REGULATE & LICENSE DOGS AND CATS

CYPRESS COUNTY BYLAW 2016/09 A BYLAW OF CYPRESS COUNTY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESTRAINING AND REGULATING DOGS.

VILLAGE OF ROSALIND BY-LAW A BYLAW OF THE VILLAGE OF ROSALIND IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONTROLLING OF DOGS.

RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF LAKEVIEW BY-LAW NO ************

SUMMER VILLAGE OF JARVIS BAY BY-LAW #

TOWN OF LANIGAN BYLAW 2/2004

SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO A Bylaw to regulate the keeping of dogs within the Keats Island Dog Control Service Area

TOWN OF ECKVILLE BYLAW #701/10 DOG CONTROL BYLAW

ATHABASCA COUNTY BYLAW NO

CITY OF LACOMBE BYLAW 265

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

CITY OF PITT MEADOWS Dog Control Bylaw

AND WHEREAS by motion 13-GC-253 the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Bracebridge deems it expedient to amend By-law ;

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE SALMO. BYLAW #585 As Amended by Bylaw #624, 2011

THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT DANGEROUS DOG CONTROL BYLAW NO. 2383

BYLAW NUMBER

RABIES ACT CHAPTER 365 CAP Rabies LAWS OF KENYA

VILLAGE OF ELNORA THE CAT CONTROL BYLAW BYLAW NUMBER

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman ADAM J. TALIAFERRO District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem)

Corporation of the Town of Bow Island Bylaw No

CHAPTER 2.20 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS DOGS

DOG BY LAW NO ADOPTED: October 28, 2013

CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs

CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW

LOCAL LAW. Town of Alfred. Local Law No. 2 for the year A Local Law Entitled Dog Control Law for the Town of Alfred

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HAWKESBURY

This bylaw may be cited as the Dog Control Bylaw.

ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATION

VILLAGE OF CHASE BYLAW NO DOG CONTROL AND IMPOUNDING BYLAW

BYLAW NO MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF NORTHERN LIGHTS NO.22 PROVINCE OF ALBERTA

BYLAW NUMBER

BYLAW NO. 1/2005 A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF REGINA BEACH FOR LICENSING DOGS AND REGULATING AND CONTROLLING PERSONS OWNING OR HARBOURING DOGS

BYLAW 836/12 Dog Control Bylaw

BYLAW NUMBER

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE

BY-LAW 560/ DOG TAG means a numbered metal tag issued by the Village when the Owner of a Dog licenses such Dog with the Town/Village.

MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF ANTIGONISH. By-law Being a By-Law Respecting the Responsible Ownership of Dogs

CITY OF HUMBOLDT BYLAW NO. 29/2013

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF WARFIELD BYLAW 703

TOWN OF MAIDSTONE BYLAW NO

TOWN OF LUMSDEN BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING, CONTROLLING, REGULATING AND IMPOUNDING OF DOGS.

The Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth

Attachment 4: Jurisdictional Scan

BE IT ENACTED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CORNWALL AS FOLLOWS:

TITLE 10 ANIMAL CONTROL CHAPTER 1 IN GENERAL

BYLAW NUMBER BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE AND CONTROL, LICENSE AND IMPOUND DOGS IN THE SUMMER VILLAGE OF WHITE SANDS.

Companion Animals Amendment Act 2013 No 86

BERMUDA DOGS ACT : 28

CITY OF POWELL RIVER CONSOLIDATED ANIMAL CONTROL BYLAW NO. 1979, 2003

TOWN OF LEROY BYLAW NO. 5/07 A BYLAW RESPECTING ANIMAL CONTROL

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF PORT HOPE BY-LAW NO. 48/2015

DISTRICT OF SOOKE BYLAW NO. 392

The Stray Animals Regulations, 1999

TOWN OF WAWOTA BYLAW NO. 2/2013

TOWN OF LAKE LUZERNE Local Law # 3 of the Year Control of Dogs

A LOCAL LAW SETTING FORTH DOG CONTROL REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN OF DRESDEN, N.Y., COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF NEW YORK

Dog Control Ordinance

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WELLINGTON NORTH

DISTRICTCITY OF POWELL RIVER ANIMAL CONTROL BYLAW NO. 1979, 2003 CONSOLIDATION

BYLAW NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Town of Banff, in the Province of Alberta, duly assembled, enacts as follows:

Chief Administrative Officer or CAO means the Chief Administrative Officer for the Village or their designate.

BYLAW NO SUMMER VILLAGE OF YELLOWSTONE DOG AND CAT CONTROL BYLAW

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 DOG *

This chapter will be known as the "Dogs and Other Animals Control Local Law of the Town of Skaneateles."

MAURITIUS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (OFFICERS POWERS AND PROTECTION) ACT

MUNICIPALITY OF EAST HANTS BYLAW NUMBER P-1000 A BYLAW AMENDMENT TO BYLAW 111-A, DOG BYLAW

Animal Control Ordinance

2015 No. 138 DOGS, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Dangerous Dogs Exemption Schemes (England and Wales) Order 2015

TMCEC Bench Book CHAPTER 17 ANIMALS. Dangerous Dogs. 1. Dogs that Are a Danger to Persons. Definitions:

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ENDERBY BYLAW NO. 1469

CITY OF MUSKEGO CHAPTER 13 - LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ANIMALS (Ord. # )

CITY OF MELVILLE BYLAW NO. 09/2008 A BYLAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING AND CONTROLLING OF CATS AND DOGS IN THE CITY OF MELVILLE.

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF GEORGIAN BAY BY-LAW NO

Animal Control Law Village of Bergen Local Law Number 2 of 2018

Draft for Public Hearing. Town of East Haddam. Chapter (Number to be Assigned) CONTROL OF ANIMALS ORDINANCE

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

CONTROL OF DOGS BYLAW

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 53, No. 17, 30th January, No. 1 of 2014

CURRENT TEXAS ANIMAL LAWS

ANIMAL CONTROL BY-LAW

Transcription:

CONSOLIDATION OF DOG ACT (Current to: May 29, 2011) AS AMENDED BY STATUTES ENACTED UNDER SECTION 76.05 OF NUNAVUT ACT: S.N.W.T. 1998,c.34 In force April 1, 1999 AS AMENDED BY NUNAVUT STATUTES: S.Nu. 2011,c.10,s.2 s.2 in force March 10, 2011 This consolidation is not an official statement of the law. It is an office consolidation prepared for convenience only. The authoritative text of statutes can be ascertained from the Revised Statutes of the Northwest Territories, 1988 and the Annual Volumes of the Statutes of the Northwest Territories (for statutes passed before April 1, 1999) and the Statutes of Nunavut (for statutes passed on or after April 1, 1999). A copy of a statute of Nunavut can be obtained from the Territorial Printer at the address below. The Annual Volumes of the Statutes of Nunavut and this consolidation are also available online at http://www.justice.gov.nu.ca but are not official statements of the law. Any certified Bills not yet included in the Annual Volumes of the Statutes of Nunavut can be obtained through the Office of the Clerk of the Legislative Assembly. Territorial Printer Legislation Division Department of Justice Government of Nunavut Tel.: (867) 975-6305 P.O. Box 1000, Station 550 Fax: (867) 975-6189 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Email: Territorial.Printer@gov.nu.ca

GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN CONSOLIDATIONS c. means "chapter". Miscellaneous CIF NIF means "comes into force". means "not in force". s. means "section" or "sections", "subsection" or "subsections", "paragraph" or "paragraphs". Sch. SI-005-98 SI-012-2003 means "schedule". means the instrument registered as SI-005-98 in 1998. (Note: This is a Northwest Territories statutory instrument if it is made before April 1, 1999, and a Nunavut statutory instrument if it is made on or after April 1, 1999 and before January 1, 2000.) means the instrument registered as SI-012-2003 in 2003. (Note: This is a Nunavut statutory instrument made on or after January 1, 2000.) Citation of Acts R.S.N.W.T. 1988,c.D-22 R.S.N.W.T. 1988,c.10(Supp.) S.N.W.T. 1996,c.26 S.Nu. 2002,c.14 means Chapter D-22 of the Revised Statutes of the Northwest Territories, 1988. means Chapter 10 of the Supplement to the Revised Statutes of the Northwest Territories, 1988. (Note: The Supplement is in three volumes.) means Chapter 26 of the 1996 Annual Volume of the Statutes of the Northwest Territories. means Chapter 14 of the 2002 Annual Volume of the Statutes of Nunavut.

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTERPRETATION Definitions 1 (1) Running at large (2) OFFICERS Appointment of officers 2 (1) R.C.M.P. (2) PROHIBITIONS Food and water 3 Punishment and abuse 4 Defined area 5 (1) Running at large (2) Dogs in harness 6 (1) Driving dogs on sidewalk (2) SEIZURE Seizure 7 (1) Recovery by owner (2) Sale by public auction (3) Distribution of proceeds (4) Where dog not claimed nor sold (5) Exigent destruction of dogs (6) No damages or compensation (6.1) By-laws of municipality (7) DESTRUCTION Where unable to seize 8 (1) No damages payable for destruction (2) PROTECTION FROM DOGS Destruction of dogs 9 Proceedings against owner 10 (1) Order (2) Action for damages not barred 11 Nature of proof in civil action 12 i

OFFENCE AND PUNISHMENT Offence and punishment 13 (1) Destruction order (2) REGULATIONS AND RULES Regulations and rules 14 ii

Definitions 1. (1) In this Act, DOG ACT INTERPRETATION "dog" includes male and female dogs and an animal that is a cross between a dog and a wolf; (chien) "muzzle" means to secure the mouth of a dog in such a fashion that it cannot bite anything; (museler) "officer" means a person appointed as an officer under subsection 2(1) and an officer by virtue of his or her office pursuant to subsection 2(2); (agent) "owner" means a person who owns, harbours, possesses or has control or custody of a dog. (propriétaire) Running at large (2) For the purposes of this Act, a dog is running at large if it is off the premises of its owner and is not (a) (b) muzzled; or under the physical control of a person. S.Nu. 2011,c.10,s.2(2). OFFICERS Appointment of officers 2. (1) The Minister may appoint persons to be officers for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this Act. R.C.M.P. (2) Every member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police is, by virtue of his or her office, an officer under this Act. S.Nu. 2011,c.10,s.2(3),(4). PROHIBITIONS Food and water 3. No owner shall allow a dog to remain unfed or unwatered sufficiently long (a) to amount to cruelty; or (b) to cause the dog to become a nuisance. Punishment and abuse 4. No person shall punish or abuse a dog in a manner or to an extent that is cruel or unnecessary. 1

Defined area 5. (1) The Commissioner may define an area within which a dog is not permitted to run at large. Running at large (2) No owner shall permit a dog to run at large (a) within any area that is defined by the Commissioner under subsection (1); or (b) contrary to a municipal by-law. Dogs in harness 6. (1) No person shall leave a dog in harness within a settlement or within one kilometre of a settlement unless the dog is (a) (b) muzzled; or under the custody and physical control of a person over 16 years of age who is capable of ensuring that the dog will not harm the public or create a nuisance. Driving dogs on sidewalk (2) No person shall drive a dog or dog team on a sidewalk situated on the street or road of a settlement. SEIZURE Seizure 7. (1) An officer may seize a dog from a person whom the officer (a) finds contravening this Act; or (b) has good cause to suspect of having contravened or being about to contravene this Act. Recovery by owner (2) Subject to subsection (6), an officer who has seized a dog under subsection (1) may, in the officer's discretion, restore possession of the dog to its owner where (a) the owner claims possession of the dog within five days after the date of seizure; and (b) the owner pays to the officer all expenses incurred in securing, caring for and feeding the dog. Sale by public auction (3) Where, at the end of five days, possession of a dog has not been restored to the owner under subsection (2), the officer may sell the dog at public auction. Distribution of proceeds (4) The proceeds of a sale of a dog by public auction shall be distributed as follows: 2

(a) (b) (c) all expenses incurred in securing, caring for and feeding the dog shall be paid to the officer; the expenses of the public auction shall be paid; any balance shall be paid to the owner or, if the owner cannot be found within a reasonable period of time after the sale, shall be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund. Where dog not claimed nor sold (5) An officer may, as the officer considers appropriate, destroy or dispose of a dog seized under this section where (a) the dog has not been claimed under subsection (2), within five days after the seizure; and (b) no bid has been received at a sale by public auction under subsection (3). Exigent destruction of dog (6) An officer may destroy a dog seized under this section, as soon after the seizure as the officer thinks fit, without permitting any person to claim the dog under subsection (2) or offering it for sale by public auction under subsection (3), where, in the opinion of the officer, the dog (a) (b) is injured; or should be destroyed without delay for humane reasons or for reasons of safety. No damages or compensation (6.1) No damages or compensation may be recovered on account of the destruction or disposal of a dog pursuant to subsections (5) or (6). By-laws of municipality (7) Where the seizure of a dog is made for contravention of a municipal by-law respecting dogs, the provisions of the by-law respecting the impounding, selling or destruction of dogs apply instead of the provisions of this section. S.Nu. 2011,c.10,s.2(5). DESTRUCTION Where unable to seize 8. (1) Where an officer is unable to seize a dog that is running at large contrary to this Act, or an order, rule or regulation made under this Act, the officer may destroy the dog. No damages payable for destruction (2) No damages or compensation may be recovered on account of the destruction of a dog by an officer under subsection (1). 3

PROTECTION FROM DOGS Destruction of dogs 9. A person may kill a dog that is running at large and in the act of pursuing, attacking, injuring, damaging, killing or destroying (a) a person; (b) another dog that is tethered; (c) a food cache, harness or other equipment; or (d) cattle, horses, sheep, pigs, poultry or animals on a fur farm. Proceedings against owner 10. (1) On complaint made on oath before a justice of the peace that an owner has a dog that has, while running at large, committed any of the acts set out in section 9, the justice may issue a summons directed to the owner of the dog requiring the owner to appear before the justice at a time and place stated in the summons to answer the complaint. Order (2) On summary conviction on the evidence of one or more credible witnesses other than the complainant, the justice of the peace may make an order for the destruction of the dog within three days and where the dog is not destroyed pursuant to the order, the justice may, in his or her discretion, impose a fine not exceeding $20 on the owner. Action for damages not barred 11. No conviction or order under section 10 bars the owner of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs, poultry, animals on a fur farm, a tethered dog, a food cache, harness or other equipment from bringing an action for the recovery of damages for injury done to these animals or things by a dog. Nature of proof in civil action 12. It is not necessary for the plaintiff in an action referred to in section 11 to prove that the defendant knew of the propensity of the dog to pursue, worry, injure or destroy animals and the liability of the defendant does not depend on previous knowledge of that propensity. OFFENCE AND PUNISHMENT Offence and punishment 13. (1) Every person who contravenes this Act is guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $25 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 30 days. Destruction order (2) The presiding judge or justice of the peace may, on conviction of an owner for an offence under this Act, order the destruction of any dog of that owner that the judge or 4

justice considers should be destroyed for humane reasons or for the safety of the general public. S.N.W.T. 1998,c.34,Sch.C,s.7. REGULATIONS AND RULES Regulations and rules 14. The Commissioner, on the recommendation of the Minister, may make regulations and rules for carrying out the purposes and provisions of this Act. PRINTED BY TERRITORIAL PRINTER FOR NUNAVUT 2011 5