USE OF CALIFORNIA MASTITIS TEST, SOMATIC CELLS COUNT AND BACTERIOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN DIAGNOSTICS OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS

Similar documents
University of Missouri Extension Using the California Mastitis Test

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation

LOCAL TOLERANCE OF INTRAMAMMARY PREPARATIONS IN COWS

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Differential Somatic Cell Count with the Fossomatic 7 DC - a novel parameter

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 2, 2017,

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

AUTOMATIC MILKING SYSTEMS AND MASTITIS

Options for Handling Mastitis during Lactation in Modern Dairy Farms

The Bimeda Guide to Selective Dry Cow Therapy

Managing Mastitis in Dairy Heifers to Improve Overall Herd Health

Caused by microorganisms (usually bacteria) that invade the udder, multiply, and produce toxins that are harmful to the mammary gland

Summary. Table 1. Estimated infection prevalence and losses in milk production associated with elevated bulk tank somatic cell counts.

DRY YOUR BEST. The incidence and importance of milk leakage in the dry cow. Ana I. de Prado Corporate Technical Manager Ceva Santé Animale (France)

TECHNOTE 14. Decide dry cow management strategy DRYING OFF

Prevention of clinical and subclinical mastitis

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

Mastitis Prevention and Cure Rates in Heifers Treated with Spectramast Dry Cow Therapy and/or Orbeseal Dry Cow Teat Sealant

Detection of Mastitis

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

Somatic Cell Count: A Biomarker for Early Diagnosis and Therapeutic Evaluation in Bovine Mastitis

April Boll Iowa State University. Leo L. Timms Iowa State University. Recommended Citation

Mastitis control in bred heifers: Use of dry cow therapy and teat sealant for curing existing intramammary infections and preventing new ones

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

TREATMENT OF SUB-CLINICAL MASTITIS IN LACTATING COWS EVALUATION OF A NEW PROTOCOL CALLED "SIMULTANEOUS TREATMENT"

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Practical Strategies for Treating Mastitis Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

Mastitis Reminders and Resources LAURA SIEGLE EXTENSION AGENT VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AMELIA COUNTY

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

RISKS, REALITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH MASTITIS TREATMENTS

Last 2-3 months of lactation

Prevalence and herd-level risk factors for intramammary infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci in Dutch dairy herds

S. P. Oliver, R. A. Almeida, B. E. Gillespie, S. J. Ivey, H. Moorehead, P. Lunn, H. H. Dowlen, D. L. Johnson, and K. C. Lamar

Somatic Cell Count as an Indicator of Subclinical Mastitis. Genetic Parameters and Correlations with Clinical Mastitis

Guideline on the conduct of efficacy studies for intramammary products for use in cattle

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

29/11/2017. Best Milking Practices. Greg Strait- Fulton County Extension Amber Yutzy- Huntingdon County Extension

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

, Pamela L. Ruegg

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

Interpretation of Bulk Tank Milk Results

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

Influence of hygienic condition on prevalence

Mastitis in Dairy Goats 1

New Model. Digital Mastitis Detector. Reduce of risk at early stage

Understanding the Basics of Mastitis

Incidence of subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy heifers in the first 100 days in lactation and associated risk factors

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

A New Index for Mastitis Resistance

MASTITIS PATHOGENS IN MILK OF DAIRY COWS IN SLOVAKIA

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

Herd Navigator and mastitis management

Emerging Mastitis Threats on the Dairy Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM Dept. of Dairy Science

The association between the somatic cell count and isolated microorganisms during subclinical mastitis in heifers in Jordan

Summary. Introduction. Damage Caused by Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

Use of a novel adjuvant to enhance the antibody response to vaccination against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy heifers.

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

The organism Infection process Tissue reaction SCC response Prevention Treatment

How to Decrease the Use of Antibiotics in Udder Health Management

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement

Veterinaria.com.pt 2009; Vol. 1 Nº 1: e13 (publicação inicial em Julho de 2008) Disponível em

Lactation. Macroscopic Anatomy of the Mammary Gland. Anatomy AS 1124

Best practice guide for on-farm mastitis control

Isolation and identification of major causing bacteria from bovinemastitis R. Lakshmi 1 and K.K. Jayavardhanan 2

Low Somatic Cell Count: a Risk Factor for Subsequent Clinical Mastitis in a Dairy Herd

Subclinical mastitis in small ruminants: prevalence, comparative aspects and prevention

ENVIRACOR J-5 aids in the control of clinical signs associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) mastitis

Mastitis Management and SCC Control in Once a Day Herds. Don Crowley- Teagasc

Prevalence of sub clinical mastitis in small holder dairy farms in Selale, North Shewa Zone, Central Ethiopia

MALLA HOVI & STEVE RODERICK, Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics Unit, University of Reading, PO Box 236, READING RG6 6AT

Update on Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis. John R. Middleton College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia

Bovine subclinical mastitis caused by different types of coagulase-negative staphylococci

Effect of dry cow therapy on incidence of clinical mastitis, milk yield and composition in crossbred cows

Bovine Mastitis: Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus Aureus in Small Holder Herds of Bench Maji Zone, Southern Ethiopia

A Cross Sectional Study on the Prevalence of Sub Clinical Mastitis and Associated Risk Factors in and Aronund Gondar, Northern Ethiopia

1 st EMP-meeting: European boom in AMS and new tools in mastitis prevention

Milk Secretion and Quality Standards

Mastitis in Dairy. Cattle. Oregon State System of Higher Education Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College JOHN 0.

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program Fact Sheet Udder Health Herd Goals

MILK QUALITY PROGRAMS FOR TRANSITION COWS AND HEIFERS. Leo Timms Iowa State University, Ames IA

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Bovine Mastitis Products for Microbiological Analysis

Transcription:

Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 26 (1-2), p 65-74, 2010 ISSN 1450-9156 Publisher: Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun UDC 614..9 DOI: 10.2298/BAH1002065V USE OF CALIFORNIA MASTITIS TEST, SOMATIC CELLS COUNT AND BACTERIOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN DIAGNOSTICS OF SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS N. Varatanović 1, M. Podžo 1, T. Mutevelić 1, K. Podžo 1, B. Čengić 1, A. Hodžić 2, E. Hodžić 2 1 Department for Obstetrics and Udder Disease, Veterinary faculty Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2 Federal Institute of Agriculture Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Coresponding author: porodiljac@yahoo.com Original scientific paper Abstract: We have performed diagnostics of sub clinical mastitis in three different cow breeds with comparison of California mastitis test results, somatic cells count at quarter level and with bacteriological findings confirmation in order to justify their appliance in mastitis diagnostics. In total, 90 cows or 360 quarters of mammary gland have been examined. In 63.3 % of the examined cows, with different racial origin, positive reaction to California mastitis test have been established. Usually, positive reaction have been found in milk of one and two quarters, with reaction intensity of one and two plus. SSC higher than 200.000 in 1 ml is established in 60 % of cases and the most often causes of mastitis were staphylococcae, streptococcae and mixed infections. With continuous use of this methods it is possible to timely detect presence of sub clinical mastitis and so to obtain satisfactory results in prevention and therapy of mastitis, as well as improvement in amount and quality of milk. Key words: sub clinical mastitis, California mastitis test, somatic cells count, cow Introduction Inflammation of mammary gland or mastitis is response of mammary gland to action of different internal and extrenal factors. During last few decades mastitis has become very expensive disease of dairy cows (Kossabiati et al., 1997; Fourichon et al., 2001; Bennett et al., 2002). It is established that there is high risk of developing subclinical mastitis in period of early lactation and high procent of intramammary infections in postpartum period (De Viegher et al., 2005; Oliver et al., 2003; Trinidad et al., 1990). In researches efforts are directed to improve

66 N. Varatanović et al. success of clinical mastitis treatment and supervision of subclinical mastitis in wish to obtain milk of high quality (Febre et al., 1999; Hillerton et al., 1998). Identification and removing of intramammary infections in early period of lactation are significantly economically usefull. The occurrence of mastitis according to Barkem at al. (1999) special influence have management of the herd, including housing, diet and udder management. Status of udder infection can be expressed as clinical and subclinical mastitis. Clinical mastitis is characteristic by visible changes in milk with appearance of flakes or blobs and with appearance of oedema and pain in the udder. Subclinical mastitis has been defined as inflammation without clear signs. Forms of subclinical mastitis are: disorder od secretion, latent infection and chronically cataral mastitis. Subclinical mastitis is widespread disease in milk production where at every clinical case of mastitis, 15-40 subclinical cases appears (Kelly et al., 2002). Inflammation of mammary gland is followed with increase of somatic cells count in milk (Rodriguez et al., 2000). In milk from healthy quarters (Antunac et al., 1997) somatic cells count (SCC) is less than 200.000 cells/ml, and it is made of epithelium cells and leukocytes (polimorphonuclear neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages and other cells). For detection of subclinical mastitis there are series of methods and tests, but the simplest and practically reliable is California Mastitis Test (CMT), (Dingvell et al., 2003; De Viegher et al., 2005) as determination of somatic cells by electronic counters. Purpose of this research was to compare results of California Mastitis Test, findings of SCC and microbiological findings of mammary gland secretion from different breeds of cows as method for control and diagnostics of subclinical mastitis. Materials and Methods Researches were performed in three herds in: black east friesean cows in large farm breeding near Sarajevo, simental cows in privat mini farm near Ilijaš and hereford cows in Han Pijesak farm whose milk is used only for feeding of calves by suckling without milking. Out of every breed 30 cows has been examined. Control of mammary gland health we performed with clinical examination of udder, milk testing from every quarter of udder using CMT as with milk sampling for SCC and bacteriological search. Using clinical methods of examination all changes which are incurred in tissue of mammary gland with acute or chronical inflammatory process are established. By inspection we looked at asimetry of quarters and differences in shape, development and teats position. With palpation from tip of the teats over milk cistern, we established irregularity of teat tip, thickening and swelling in teat channel and parenchyma comparing quarters between themselves. After clinical examination of mammary gland we performed milk testing from every quarters by CMT (SOMA TEST and test plate manufactured by FARM

Use of california mastitis test... 67 d.o.o.vrbanovac RH). We have performed test during months April and May directly in test plates in stables, with cows immediately after clinical examination and before morning milking. Reagent is mixed with aproximate same quantity of milk (1-2 ml) and with light circular motions of test plate results of changes are readable within 1-2 minutes. Milk samples rich with cellular elements gave visible changes within few seconds. Presentation of reaction was: negative ( - ) in cases where we had mixture of milk and reagent as homogenous transcendentally, suspected ( ± ) appearance of blobs and flakes which with further mixing disappear, positive ( + ) appearance of flakes that with further mixing concentrate in the middle, very positive reaction ( ++ ) where during mixing of reagent and milk thick viscous mass is created with separation of clear liquid and extremely positive reaction ( +++ ) where gelatine mass was created. Before taking samples for BSS determination and microbiological analysis teats were washed and desinfected with 70% alcohol and in a sterile container intended for SCC analise we took 25 ml of milk and in a special sterile test tubes samples for microbiological examination. Each container and beaker are marked with number of udder quarter and number of animal.. Samples were taken from every udder quarter regardless whether CMT reacted positively or negatively. Analysis of SCC we have worked in Federal institute for agriculture Sarajevo using Fusomatic FC 6200 device with method of flow cytometry and microbiological milk examination with common methods. All obtained results we processed with the method of absolute and relative frequency and their testing is done with Z test for comparison at the level of significance α = 0,05 Results Research consisted of 90 cows of different breeds (Table 1). From the total number of examined cows positive reaction of California mastitis test was determined at 57 or 63.33% cows. Table 1. Number and percentage of cows according to breeds that positively reacted to the CMT Breeds of cows Number of examined cows Positive reaction % positive Simmental 30 16 53.3 Hereford 30 22 73.3 East Frisian 30 19 63.3 Total 90 57 63.3

68 N. Varatanović et al. The percentage of positive cows within the breed ranges from 53.3% to 73.3%. Results indicate the relative uniformity regardless of the obvious differences between breeds. Table 2. Number and percentage of udder quarters with positive reaction to the CMT Breed of cows Number of positive cows Examined Number of cows with Negative Positive quarters udder positive reaction by quarter quarters quarters One Two Three Four number % number Simmental 16 64 6 7 2 1 30 46.8 34 Hereford 22 88 2 10 7 3 55 62.5 33 East Frisian 19 76 4 10 1 4 43 56.0 33 Total 57 228 12 27 10 8 128 56.1 100 From the total number of examined quarters 128 has reacted positive to CMT or 56.1% of cases (Table 2). The most positive reactions were found in the milk of two quarters and least in milk of all four quarters. Within individual breeds, reaction of California mastitis test was quite uniform. Table 3. Reaction intensity of CMT in relation to the cow breeds and quarters Breed of Total Quarters of the udder according to intensity of the test cows examined - ± + ++ +++ quarters No. % No. % No. % No. % No % Simmental 64 34 53.1 2 3.1 14 21.8 13 20.3 1 1.5 Hereford 88 33 37.5 6 6.8 31 35.2 15 17.0 3 3.4 East Frisian 76 33 43.4 3 3.9 22 28.9 16 21.0 2 2.6 Total 228 100 43.8 11 4.8 67 29.3 44 19.3 6 2.6 Reactions of the California mastitis test with mark ± (doubtful reaction) were represented in 4.8% of cases (Table 3). The greatest percentage of positive quarters was with one or two plus and it was 29.3% and 19.3% and the lowest positive percentage was recorded at the most intensive reaction with three plus, out of 2.6% From the total number of tested quarters 43.8% showed a negative reaction. Viewed by breed most positive reactions to the mastitis test was recorded at Hereford cows.

Use of california mastitis test... 69 Table 4. Relationship between CMT and SCC in milk from quarters of different breed cows in % Breed of cows Total examined quarters Quarters of the udder according to intensity of the test - ± + ++ +++ No % No % No % No % No % Simmen. 64 34 53.1 2 3.1 14 21.8 13 20.3 1 1.5 Heref. 88 33 37.5 6 6.8 31 35.2 15 17.0 3 3.4 East. Frisi. 76 33 43.4 3 3.9 22 28.9 16 21.0 2 2.6 Total 228 100 43.8 11 4.8 67 29.3 44 19.3 6 2.6 Breed of cows Total examined quarters Quarters of the udder according to number of somatic cells in 1 ml. 200.000 200.000-400.000 500.000-1.500.00 2.000.000-5.000.000 Over 5.000.000 No % No % No % No % No % Simmen. 64 32 50.0 6 9.3 11 9.3 14 21.8 1 1.5 Heref. 88 28 31.8 8 9.0 30 34.0 17 19.31 5 5.6 East. Frisi. 76 31 40.7 5 6.5 22 28.9 15 19.7 3 3.9 Total 228 91 39.9 19 8.3 63 27.6 46 20.7 9 3.9 Reaction of the mastitis test with the mark ++ and +++ (Table 4) shows that in milk there is more than 500.000 thousand somatic cells and with mark ± and + less than the specified limits. From 228 samples of milk 100 of them gave a negative reaction to mastitis test and 91 samples were in limits up to 200.000 somatic cells in 1ml of milk. From the breeds, largest number of samples whose had over 200.00 somatic cells in 1ml is registered in Hereford breed which agrees with the reaction of CMT. Viewed by percentage difference between mastitis test, which amounted 56.1% and number of somatic cells larger than 200.000 in value of 60.0% talk about coincidences and justification of these methods in diagnostics of mastitis with obligatory bacteriological analysis of milk.

70 N. Varatanović et al. Table 5. Results of CMT and bacteriological findings Total examined quarters Bacteriological findings % of matching CMT Simmen. negative microccocae Nonpathogen staphilococce Staph. aureus streptococcae Streptococcus.agalactie Mixed infection Accordance of results - 34 32 1 1 2 5.8 ± 2 1 1 1 50.0 + 14 1 2 1 6 1 2 1 13 92.8 ++ 13 1 2 1 4 1 4 13 100.0 +++ 1 1 1 100.0 64 34 3 4 8 5 4 6 31 48.4 Hereford - 33 28 2 1 3 5 15.1 ± 6 2 2 1 1 4 66.6 + 31 5 4 7 5 3 2 5 26 83.8 ++ 15 1 2 7 1 1 3 14 93.3 +++ 3 2 1 3 100.0 88 36 6 11 15 4 4 12 52 59.0 East Fris. - 33 31 1 1 2 6.0 ± 3 3 3 100.0 + 22 1 3 1 7 2 3 5 21 95.4 ++ 16 2 3 4 6 1 16 100.0 +++ 2 2 2 76 32 6 7 11 10 3 7 44 57.8 Total 228 101 15 22 34 20 11 25 127 55.7 Bacteriological findings (Table 5) confirmed the validity of application CMT in detection of subclinical mastitis. Of the total 228 samples 43.8% gave a negative reaction to CMT of which 75 had a positive bacteriological finding what draws our attention to the latent infection of the udder. Analyzing positive reactants on CMT out of them 128 only 8.5% gave a negative bacteriological findings. Most common cause of the mastitis were staphylococcae. streptococcae and mixed infections.

Use of california mastitis test... 71 Discussion Past efforts in supression of mastitis and control of mammary gland health status are based on detection of animals with disturbed secretion and identifying causes of such conditions. To prevent and reduce infections of mammary gland with pathogenic bacterias from environment it is necessary to take care of the complete production management (Ferguson et al.. 2006; Kelmus et al.. 2006; Compton et al.. 2007) what we support. Inflammation of the mammary gland is usually characterized by increase of somatic cells in milk. At the level of cow (quarter) SCC is 200.000/ml in healthy non-infected quarter and can be lower than 100.000/ml (Echlenbach et al.. 1971). About 50% non-infected cows have SCC under 100.000/ml and 80% to 200.000 cells/ml. Every increase of SCC is considered as abnormal and indicate a mammary gland inflammation what is confirmed by our research. Comparing CMT and SCC (Sargeant et al.. 2001). CMT represent a suitable test for herd inspection and detection of subclinical mastitis caused by mastitis agents in 84% of cases. Bacteriological findings indicates that increase of CMT reaction increase also probability of infection and (Pyrola et al.. 2003) even in negative CMT reaction 25% of quarters are infected. suspicious 50%. positive 75%. very positive 90% and extremly positive 90-100% what is somewhat in consent with our research. Relationship of reaction correspondence between CMT and bacteriological findings range from 70 to 86% depending on the causative agent (Sanford et al.. 2006) while Bastan at al. (2008) gives data of correspondence of 85%. In our research percentage of correspondence between CMT and bacteriological findings is 55.7%. As most common isolated causative agents series of authors (Bradley. 2002; Dingvell et al.. 2003; Fatur et al.. 2000; Milne et al.. 2002; Schukken et al.. 1989; Sol et al.. 2002) cite staphylococcae and streptococcae. Our research coincide with studies by these authors but we noted in addition to listed pathogens mixed infection in 10.8% of cases. Conclusion Based on the analysis of secretion from mammary gland using CM. determining SCC and bacteriological findings it can be concluded that: CMT as SCC findings represent valuable diagnostic methods in detection of cows with secretion disorder. whose show no clinical signs of disease. Secretion disorder of mammary gland is detected by CMT in 63.3% of cows. Difference between reaction of CMT and SCC at quarter level of 3.9% talks about justification of these methods in detection of mammary gland disorders and subclinical mastitis.

72 N. Varatanović et al. When negative reaction by CMT occured. bacteriological analysis has found 7% infected quarters which indicates the presence of latent mastitis and in 8.5% of cases with positive reactions to CMT involved secretion disorder because bacteriological findings were negative. The percentage of matching between CMT and bacteriological findings was 55.7%. According to the types of isolated pathogens in the first place are staphylococcae. streptococcae and mixed infections. We believe that with this method of mammary gland health status control and better participation of complete management in production it is possible to obtain satisfactory results in improving quantity and quality of milk and suppression of chronical and decrease of acute mastitis numbers. Primena kalifornija mastitis testa. broja somatskih stanica i bakterološkog nalaza u dijagnostici subkliničkih mastitisa N. Varatanović. M. Podžo. T. Mutevelić. K. Podžo. B. Čengić. A. Hodžić. E. Hodžić Rezime Dijagnostiku supkliničkih mastitisa kod tri različite pasmine krava vršili smo upoređivanjem rezultata Kalifornija mastitis testa. broja somatskih ćelija na nivou četvrti uz potvrdu bakteriološkim nalazom u cilju opravdanosti njihove primene u dijagnostici mastitisa. Ukupno je pregledano 90 krava ili 360 četvrti mlečne žlezde. U 63.3% slučajeva pregledanih krava različitog pasminskog porekla utvrđena je pozitivna reakcija na Kalifornija mastitis test. Najčešče smo pozitivnu reakciju ustanovili u mleku jedne i dve četvrti sa intenzitetom reakcije od jednog i dva plusa. BSS veći od 200.000 u 1 ml je ustanovljen u 60% slučajeva. a najzastupljeniji uzročnici mastitisa su bili stafilokoke. streptokoke i mešane infekcije. Kotinuiranom upotrebom ovih metoda moguće je blagovremeno otkriti prisutnost supkliničkih mastitisa i tako dobiti zadovoljavajuće rezultate u prevenciji i terapiji mastitisa kao i povećanju količine i poboljšanju kvaliteta mleka. References ANTUNAC N.. LUKAČ-HAVRENEK JASMINA. SAMARŽIJA DUBRAVKA (1997): Somatske stanice i njihov utjecaj na kakvoču i preradu mlijeka. Mljekarstvo: proizvodnja. proučavanje i tehnologija mlijeka i mliječnih proizvoda. 47. 3. 183-193.

Use of california mastitis test... 73 BARKEMA H.W.. VAN DER PLOEG J.D.. SCHUKKEN Y.H.. LAM T.J..BENEDICTUS G.. BRAND A (1999): Management style and its association with bulk milk somatic cell count and incidence rate of clinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci.. 82. 1655-1663. BASTAN A.. KACAR C.. ACAR B.D.. SAHIN M.. CENGIZ M. (2008): Investigation of the Incidence and Diagnosis of Subclinical Mastitis in Early Lactation Period Cows. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci.. 32. 2. 119-121. BENNETT R.M.. CHRISTJANSEN K.. CLIFTON-HADLEY R.S. (1999): Estimating the costs associated with endemic diseases of dairy cattle. J.Dairy Res. 66. 455-459. BRADLEY A.J. (2002). Bovine mastitis:an evolving disease. The Veterinary journal. 164. 116-28. COMPTON C.W.. HEUER C.. PARKER K.. MCDOUGALL S. (2007): Epidemiology of mastitis in pasture grazed peripartum dairy heifers and its effects on productivity. J. Dairy Sci.. 90. 9. 4157-4170. DE VIEGHER S.. BARKEMA H.W.. STRYHN H.. OPSOMER G.. DE KRUIF A. (2005): Impact of early lactation somatic cell count in heifers on milk yield over the first lactation. J. Dairy Sci.. 88. 938-947. DINGVELL R.T.. LESLIE K.E.. SCHUKKEN Y.H.. SARGEANT J.M.. TIMMS L.L. (2003): Evaluation of the California mastitis test to detect an intramammary infection with a major pathogen in early lactation dairy cows. Can. Vet. J.. 44. 413-416. ECHLENBACH E.. WITT W. (1971): Analysis of disease prevelance in intenzive dairy cattle units. Monatschr. Vet. Med.. 26. 561-563. FABRE J.M.. BERTHELOT X.. BOUSQUET E.. BOSQUET G.. LAUMONNIER G.. SEEGERS H.( 1999): Traitement des mammites subcliniques en lactation: expérimentation d'un nouveau protocole dit "traitement en parallèle". Bulletin des GTV. 1. 49-58. FATUR B.. MAVSAR N.. VERDNIK M. (2000): Sezonska pojavnost subkliničkih mastitisa. XXII Savjetovanje s međunarodnim učešćem. Pliva i stočarska proizvodnja-govedarstvo. Supetar. FERGUSON J.D.. AZZARO G.. GAMBINA M.. LICITRA G. (2007): Prevalence of mastitis pathogens in Ragusa. Sicily from 2000 to 2006. J. Dairy Sci.. 90. 12. 5798-5813. FOURICHON C.. BEUDEAU F.. BAREILLE N.. SEEGERS H.( 2001): Incidence of health disorders in dairy farming systems in western France. Liwestock Prod. Sci.. 68. 157-170. HILLERTON J.E. (1998): Mastitis therapy is necessary for animal welfare. Bulletin of the IDF. 330. 4-5. KELLY A.L. (2002): Test metods and standards. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. Academic Press. 3. 1995 2002.

74 N. Varatanović et al. KELMUS P.. VILTROP A.. AASMÄE B.. KASR K. (2006). Occurence of clinical mastitis primiparous Estonian dairy cows in different housing conditions. Acta. Vet. Scand.. 10. 1186/1751-0147-48-21. KOSSABIATI M.A.. ESSLEMONT R.J. (1997). The costs of producrion diseases in dairy herds in England. Vet. J.. 154. 41-51. MILNE M.H.. BARRET D.C.. FITZPATRICK J.L.. BIGGS A.M. (2002): Prevalence and aetiology of clinical mastitis on dairy farms in Devon. Veterinary Record.. 151. 241-243. OLIVER S.P.. LEWIS M.J.. GILLESPIE B.E.. DOWLEN H.H. (1992): Influence of prepartum antibiotic therapy on intramammary infections in primigravid heifers during early lactation. J. Dairy Sci.. 75. 406-408. PYROLA S. (2003): Indicator of inflamation in diagnosis of mastitis. Vet. Res.. 34. 565-578. RODRIGUEZ-ZAS S.L.. GIANOLA D..SHOOKG E. (2000): Evaluation of models for comatoc cell score lactation patterns in Holsteins Livest. Prod. Sci.. 67. 19-30. SANFORD C.J..KEFFE G.P.. SANCHEZ J.. DINGWELL R.T.. BARKEMA H.W.. LESLIE K.E.. DOHOO I.R. (2006). Test characteristics from latent-ciass models of the California Mastitis test. Prevent. Vet. Medicine. 77. 1-2. 96-108. SARGEANT J.M.. LESLIE K.E.. SHIRLEY J.E.. PULKRABEK B.J. ET AL. (2001): Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell count and California Mastitis Test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci.. 84. 2018-2024. SCHUKKEN Y.H.. SMIT J.A.H.. GROMMERS J.. VANDEGEER D.. BRAND A. (1989): Effect of freezing on bacteriologic culturing of mastitis milk samples. J. Dairy Sci.. 72. 1900-1906. SOL J.. SAMPIMON O.C.. HARTMAN E.. BARKEMA H.W. (2002): Effect of preculture feezing and incubation on bacteriological isolation from subclinical mastitis semples. Vet. Microbiol.. 85. 241-49. TRINIDAD P.. NICKERSON S.C.. ALLEY T.K. (1990): Prevalence of intramammary infection and teat canal colonisation in unbred and primigravid dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci.. 73. 107. Received 13 October 2009; accepted for publication 03 February 2010