Post Graduate Department of Zoology, Hislop College, Nagpur, , India;

Similar documents
Key for the Swedish damselflies

Species and sex biases in ectoparasitism of dragonflies by mites

Dragonflies. of Norfolk

The Dragonflies of. Bramshill. Site of Special Scientific Interest. Freshwater Habitats Trust. Author Ken Crick

(Anisoptera: Libellulidae)

Pictorial Handbook on

Report of Water Mite Larvae in the Esophagus and Stomach Walls of Mountain Whitefish in British Columbia

Attachment sites of Allothrombium pulvinum larvae (Acari: Trombidiidae) ectoparasitic on aphid hosts

CHAPTER 3. INSECTA (Aquatic Insects)

Top Ten Grape Insect Pests in Nebraska Chelsey M. Wasem and Frederick P. Baxendale Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

TWO NEW SPECIES OF WATER MITES FROM OHIO 1-2

SEASONAL CHANGES IN A POPULATION OF DESERT HARVESTMEN, TRACHYRHINUS MARMORATUS (ARACHNIDA: OPILIONES), FROM WESTERN TEXAS

The Armyworm in New Brunswick

Aquatic Macroinvertebrates

The effects of diet upon pupal development and cocoon formation by the cat flea (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae)

Wildlife Disease Study

Life Cycle of Carpophilus humeral is F. (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) in Puerto Rico 1 2

Dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) of Nagaland, with an addition to the Indian odonate fauna

Contents. Introduction 6. Chapter 1: Biological Control in the Garden 8. Chapter 2: Terms and Taxonomy 20. Chapter 3: Insect Life Stages 24

An Example of Classification

Mosquito Reference Document

TWO NEW SPECIES OF MITES OF THE FAMILY ACAROPHENACIDAE (ACARI, HETEROSTIGMATA) FROM CRIMEA (UKRAINE)

Proximate Constraints on Intruder Detection in the Dragonfly Perithemis tenera (Odonata: Libellulidae): Effects of Angle of Approach and Background

Nature Club. Insect Guide. Make new friends while getting to know your human, plant and animal neighbours!

Grasshopper Dissection

Insect vectors. Dr. Carmen E. Rexach Micro 1 Mt SAC Biology Department Internet version

Comparing Life Cycles

D. F. HARDWICK. Entomology Research Institute, Canada Dept. Agric., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

BIOLOGY OF THE ANGOUMOIS GRAIN MOTH, SITOTROGA CEREALELLA (Oliver) ON STORED RICE GRAIN IN LABORATORY CONDITION

ON A NEW SPECIES OF ICHTHYURUS (CHAULIOGNATHIDAE : COLEOPTERA) FROM SILENT VALLEY

Note: The following article is used with permission of Dr. Sonia Altizer.

Notes on Varanus salvator marmoratus on Polillo Island, Philippines. Daniel Bennett.

Eutetranychus orientalis

How to Dissect Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.) to Detect Tracheal Mites (Acarapis woodi Rennie) 1

posterior part of the second segment may show a few white hairs

Three new species of Microctenochira SPAETH from Brazil and Panama (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae)

Rhinocypha arguta n. sp., a new jewel-damselfly from north-east Thailand (Odonata: Chlorocyphidae) MATTI HAMALAINEN & SIRICHAI DIVASIRI

By H. G. JOHNSTON, Ames, Iowa.

An Outbreak of Caparinia tripilis in a Colony of African Pygmy Hedgehogs (Atelerix albiventris) from Korea

NEW SCENOPINIDAE (Diptera) FROM THE PACIFIC AREA 1

Laboratory 7 The Effect of Juvenile Hormone on Metamorphosis of the Fruit Fly (Drosophila melanogaster)

A COLLECTION OF TICKS (IXODIDAE) FROM SULAWESI UTARA, INDONESIA

A New Species of the Genus Asemonea (Araneae: Salticidae) from Japan

Periplaneta americana (American Cockroach)

The Diversity of the Dragonfly of Orthetrum Genus in Protected Area of Mount Prau, Central Java Indonesia

DESCRIPTIONS OF THREE NEW SPECIES OF PETALOCEPHALA STÅL, 1853 FROM CHINA (HEMIPTERA: CICADELLIDAE: LEDRINAE) Yu-Jian Li* and Zi-Zhong Li**

Description of Echo candens sp. nov. from western Yunnan, China (Odonata: Calopterygidae)

Notes on Central Asian dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata)

NOTES ON PSYLLIDE: LIVIA.]

Necturus maculosus Family Proteidae

ISSN (Online) Journal on New Biological Reports 1(1): (2012)

Field Observation of the Giant Shield Bug in Singapore

( ) w w w. l o y a l t y l a w n c a r e. c o m

Current Status of Amphibian Populations. Amphibian biology - characteristics making

Let s Learn About Insects!

Bugs, Brook Trout, and Water Quality: How Are They Connected?

A Life History Study of Caecilius Aurantiacus (Hagen) (Psocoptera: Caeciliidae)

of Easter Island P. flavescens. Poor larval INTRODUCTION 22.5 km, maximum width 11.5 km, shape triangular)

NOTES ON TWO ASTIGMATIC MITES (ACARI) LIVING IN BEEHIVES IN THAILAND

Leafhoppers in Manitoba; Biology, Behaviour and Potential for Vectoring Plant Diseases

4. List 3 characteristics of all arthropods. a. b. c. 5. Name 3 main arthropod groups.

Class Insecta: Order Hemiptera True Bugs

The meaning of the scientific names of Seychelles dragonflies (Odonata)

Reproductive success and symmetry in zebra finches

DISCOVERY OF GENUS PLATOLENES (COLEOP TERA : TENEBRIONIDAE) FROM INDIA WITH DESCRIPTION OF TWO NEW SPECIES G. N. SABA

Public Health Problem Related to Mosquito

However, until a full series showing the merging of the THE BREMUS RESEMBLING MALLOPHORE OF THE ASILID2E). BY S. W. BROMLEY, Amherst, Mass.

Title. Author(s)Nishijima, Yutaka. CitationInsecta matsumurana, 20(1-2): Issue Date Doc URL. Type.

Insects Associated with Alfalfa Seed Production

What is your minibeast?

Daylily Leafminer, Ophiomyia kwansonis Sasakawa (Diptera: Agromyzidae), new to North America, including Florida

Abstract Mosquito Control Through Education Directed at Elimination of Container Habitats.

THE ABSORPTION OF WATER BY THE EGGS OF CORIXA PUNCTATA ILLIG. (HEMIPTERA-CORIXIDAE) UNDER EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS

26. The Relationships between Oxygen Consumption and Duration o f Pupal-Adult Development in the Silkworm Bombyx mandarina

TWO NEW PINE-FEEDING SPECIES OF COLEOTECHNITES ( GELECHIIDAE )

EVALUATION OF A METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE LAYING RATE OF BROWN-HEADED COWBIRDS

Two new species of predator mites of the genus AmbZyseitcs

INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC BIOSPHERIC STUDIES CONFERENCE CENTER HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS

THE LIFE HISTORY OF THE BLACK MOUNTAIN RINGLET BUTTERFLY PERCNODAIMON PLUTO FEREDAY

Dragonflies and Damselflies of Southeastern New York. Alan & Della Wells

Pest Solutions. A Strategy for Flea Control

LABORATORY. The Arachnids. Introduction: Objectives: At the Bench. Laboratory 6 pg. 1

Version 1.1 (updated Dec 2001) For supplier of sweep nets, please see Appendix II. Quadrats are easily made from wood or metal.

Mosquito Activity Book

Dragonflies! Dragonflies! I L O LEVELED BOOK O

A NEW SPECIES OF AGRIOCNEMIS SELYS, 1869 (ZYGOPTERA: COENAGRIONIDAE) FROM EASTERN INDIA WITH REDESCRIPTION OF AGRIOCNEMIS KERALENSIS PETER, 1981

THREE NEW SPECIES OF SCHOENGASTIA (ACARI: TROMBICULIDAE) FROM PAPUA NEW GUINEA RODENTS WITH A KEY TO SCHOENGASTIA SPECIES REPORTED FROM NEW GUINEA 1

Three new hyporheic water mite species from Australia (Acari: Hydrachnidia)

NOTES ON THE APHIDIDAE. (I.) Observations on a Semi-aquatic Aphid, Aphis aquaticus n. sp.

Which came first, The Mosquito. Or the Egg?

Morphologic study of dog flea species by scanning electron microscopy

ACTIVITY 1 What happened to the holly leaf-miner?

The Arachnids. Be able to recognize a representative mite from each of the following 5 families: Dermanyssidae

FACTORS INFLUENCING EGG SURVIVAL OF SCOLYPOPA AUSTRALIS WALKER (HEMIPTERA-HOMOPTERA: RICANIIDAE) IN THE SYDNEY AREA (N.S.W.

Biology of Citrus Trunk Borer (Anoplophora versteegi Rits.) (Coleoptera : Cerambycidae) under Laboratory Conditions

Resolving Confusion in the Use of Concepts and Terminology in Intra-Puparial

SOME ERYTHRONEURA OF THE COMES GROUP (HOMOPTERA: CICADELLIDAE)

Provisional PDF. Damselflies (Zygoptera) as paratenic hosts for Serpinema trispinosum and its report from turtle hosts from Oklahoma, USA

FOUR NEW SPECIES AND A NEW RECORD OF CHIMARRA STEPHENS (TRICHOPTERA: PHILOPOTAMIDAE) FROM BOUGAINVILLE ISLAND, PAPUA NEW GUINEA

A NEW Plexippus SPIDER FROM THE WESTERN GHATS, KUMBAKARAI FALLS, THENI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU, SOUTH INDIA (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE: SALTICIDAE)

Transcription:

Acarina 20 (2): 194 198 Acarina 2012 ECTOPARASITISM OF ANISOPTERAN DRAGONFLIES (INSECTA: ODONATA) BY WATER MITE LARVAE OF ARRENURUS SPP. (ARACHNIDA: HYDRACHNIDA: ARRENURIDAE) IN CENTRAL INDIA R. J. Andrew, N. Thaokar and P. Verma Post Graduate Department of Zoology, Hislop College, Nagpur, 440 001, India; e-mail: rajuandrew@yahoo.com ABSTRACT: There is no report on the frequency, species selection and site specificity of water mites ectoparasitism within and among dragonfly species of India. Here, we present a field survey of the species selection and site specificity of ectoparasite larval arrenurid mites on anisopteran adults at Nagpur city of central India. Since the female odonates returns to water to oviposit, it would be of some advantage for the mite to show a female-biased parasitism in order to return to water easily and continue the remaining aquatic part of their life cycle. A total of 204 specimens of anisopteran odonates belonging to 11 species were examined for the presence of larval Arrenurus spp. as ectoparasites during the post-monsoon (August September 2010) and summer (March April 2011) months from a large pond in central India. Only 14 dragonflies specimens of six species (Acisoma panorpoides, Brachythemis contaminata, Crocothemis servilia, Diplacodes trivialis, Neurothemis t. tullia, and Trithemis pallidinervis) were found to be parasitized (overall prevalence of 6.86%). The prevalence for C. servilia was 28.6%, followed by Trithemis pallidinervis and Acisoma panorpoides at 21.4%. The total number of parasites recorded was 465 at an average of 33.26 per specimen. The parasite load per host species was the highest in T. pallidinervis (92.6) followed by C. servilia (24). In C. servilia, A. panorpoides and D. trivialis the mites were attached venterally to the thorax and were mostly arranged in a v or triangular shape, while in B. contaminata and T. pallidinervis the mites were found all over the ventral abdomen. In one T. pallidinervis male and one C. servilia female, mites were found both on the thorax as well as the abdomen. The maximum number of mites found on an individual dragonfly was on the female abdomen of T. pallidinervis (114), while only one mite was found on the thorax of a male C. servilia. Mite infestation was sex-biased 71.0% and 85.7% of infested odonates were females in August September and March April, respectively KEY WORDS: Dragonfly, Anisoptera, water mites, Central India, Arrenurus INTRODUCTION Several orders of insects with aquatic larvae and non-aquatic imagos, including Odonata, are parasitized by mites. Larvae of Arrenurus spp. are common and widespread ectoparasite of dragonflies and damselflies (Smith and Oliver 1986; Smith 2009). More than 55 species of the mite Arrenurus have been described as ectoparasites of Odonata (Corbet 1999). Arrenurid larvae are true parasites and exploit their odonates hosts for both food and dispersal. They also form a phoretic association with the last instar larvae of the host. As the host emerges out of water during the final metamorphosis, the mite larvae crawl from the exuvia to the newly emerged adult and become parasitic (Andre and Cordero 1998; Zawal 2004). They start penetrating the host cuticle and full engorgement of the mite larvae can be detected 48 hours later (Abro 1982). Mites remain attached to the host throughout the pre-reproductive period of the host and progressively change color almost in unison. They drop off in water when the odonate comes to copulate and oviposit in water. Mite parasitism can reduce host longevity and fecundity, because of fluctuating asymmetry of forewing length and cell number (Bonn et al. 1967). Their flight is less frequent and less brief while the infected odonates males compete less successfully for females and are also less likely to form a tandem (Forbes 1991a). Smith and Oliver (1976) and Smith (1988) examined and reviewed the host parasite interaction and impact of water mite on insect in general and the relationship between mites and odonates has been reviewed more recently by Corbet (1999). Most of the studies of the host parasite relationship in odonates deal with the population dynamics of this relationship in Zygoptera since the damselflies appear to be more often parasite by mites than the anisopteran dragonflies (Corbet 1999). Therefore, no major attempts have yet been made to study this relationship in anisopteran dragonflies. This paper describes species selection and site specificity of larval arrenurids on anisopteran adults during the summer and post-monsoon months in the city of Nagpur in central India. MATERIAL AND METHODS Dragonflies were collected during the months of August September, 2010 (post-monsoon) and March April, 2011 (summer) from the west border of Telenkhedi pond (20 o 9 N and 79 o 9 E) located on the foothills of the Seminary hillock of Nagpur city of central India. This section of the pond is covered with submerged (Hydrilla sp.), floating (Nymphea sp., Eichornnia sp.) and marginal (Ipomea sp., Eleocharis sp., Fimbristylis sp., Cleome sp., Alternanthera sp. and Eriocaulon sp.) aquatic flora. A total of 204 individuals of 11 spe- 194

Ectoparasitism of anisopteran dragonflies by water mite larvae of Arrenurus spp. Table 1. Infected odonates observed during August September, 2010 (post monsoon) and March April, 2011 (summer). The number of infected host specimens is given in parentheses. No. Species August September 2010 March April 2011 Total number observed 1 Acisoma panorpoides 12 (1) 9 (2) 21(3) 2 Brachythemis contaminata 20 (1) 12 (1) 42 (2) 3 Bradinopyga geminata 3 3 4 Crocothemis servilia 14 (4) 10 24 (4) 5 Diplacodes trivialis 12 14(1) 26 (1) 6 Neurothemis t. tullia 27 (1) 5 32 (1) 7 Orthetrum. s. sabina 15 12 27 8 Rhyothemis v. variegata 6 10 16 9 Tramea basilaris 3 3 10 Trithemis aurora 2 0 11 Trithemis pallidinervis 10 8 (3) 18 (3) Total 121 (7) 83 (7) 204 (14) Host species Table 2. Distribution of parasitic mites Arrenurus by host species and sex. Infected hosts Number of mites Acisoma panorpoides 3F 0 22 Brachythemis contaminata 2F 0 63 Crocothemis servilia 3F, 1M 1 86 Diplacodes trivialis 1F 0 4 Neurothemis t. tullia 1M 11 0 Trithemis pallidinervis (F) 2F, 1M 1 208 Total 14 82 383 M F cies of anisopteran dragonflies were netted (Acisoma panorpoides, Brachythemis contaminata, Bradinopyga geminata, Crocothemis servilia, Diplacodes trivialis, Neurothemis tullia tullia, Orthetrum. sabina sabina, Rhyothemis variegata variegata, Tramea basilaris, Trithemis aurora and Trithemis pallidinervis). Only those individuals infested with arrenurids were photographed and fixed in the Bouins fluid for further studies. Uninfected individuals were set free after noting their reproductive status for a different popular dynamic study. OBSERVATION From a total of 204 host specimens belonging to 11 species, only 14 specimens of six species (Acisoma panorpoides, Brachythemis contaminata, Crocothemis servilia, Diplacodes trivialis, Neurothemis t. tullia and Trithemis pallidinervis) were parasitized. The overall prevalence was 6.86% (Table 1). The prevalence of the dragonfly C. servilia was 28.6%, followed by T. pallidinervis and A. panarpoides at 21.4%. The total number of parasites recorded was 465, with an average of 33.21 per host specimen. The highest parasite load per individual host species was in T. pallidinervis (92.6), followed by Crocothemis servilia (24). In C. servilia, A. panorpoides and D. trivialis the mites were attached venterally to the thorax, forming a v or triangule, while in B. contaminata and T. pallidinervis the mites were found all over the ventral abdomen. In one Tritthemis pallidinervis male and one Crocothemis servilia female, mites were found on the thorax and abdomen. The maximum number of mites found on an individual dragonfly was 114 (female T. pallidinervis, abdomen), while only one mite was found on the thorax of a male of C. servilia. Mite distribution on hosts was female-biased, from August to September 71.0% of collected mites were found on host females, while from March April, 85.7% of infested hosts were females (Tables 2 4). 195

R.J. Andrew, N. Thaokar, P. Verma Table 3. Mite attachment sites on odonate hosts collected in August September, 2010. No Host species Mite colour Mite number Attachment site wings thorax abdomen 1 Acisoma panorpoides (F) orange 1 mid-thorax 2 Brachythemis contaminata (F) greenish black 42 3 rd to 6 th abdominal segment (Fig. 1) 3 Crocothemis servilia (M) black 1 mid-thorax (Fig. 2) 4 Crocothemis servilia (F) orange 8 arranged in V-shaped 5 Crocothemis servilia (F) black 24 6 Crocothemis servilia (F) orange 54 cluster (Fig. 3) arranged in V-shape (Fig. 4) 1 st and 5 th abdominal segment 7 Neurothemis t. tullia (M) greenish black 11 arranged in V-shape No Species Table 4. Collection of mite infested dragonflies during the months of March April, 2011. Arrenurus spp. Host region colour No. wings thorax abdomen 1 Acisoma panorpoides (F) orange 13 arranged in V-shape 2 Acisoma panorpoides (F) orange 8 arranged in V-shape 3 Brachythemis contaminata (F) bottle green 21 4 Diplacodes trivialis (F) brownish black 4 shape 5 Trithemis pallidinervis (F) orange 94 2 nd to 6 th abdominal segment all over the abdomen (Fig. 5) 6 Trithemis pallidinervis (F) orange 114 all over the abdomen 7 Trithemis pallidinervis (M) pale orange 70 shape all over the abdomen (Fig. 6) DISCUSSION Although arrenurid mites do not have speciesspecific hosts, resource partioning may occur since their choice of attachment sites is conspicuous (Davids 1997; Baker et al. 2007). In the present study, Arrenurus spp. larvae are found attached to the ventral side of the thorax and abdomen of their hosts, anisopteran dragonflies. In C. servilia, A. panarpoides and D. trivialis they were attached only to the thorax and were mostly arranged in a v or triangule, while a few were found on the anterior abdominal segments probably due to overcrowding. In Coenagrion puella the mite Arrenurus maculator, although typically occurring at the posterior end of thorax, is also found on the first abdominal segment, suggesting that overcrowding on its favoured site may lead to occupation of an adjacent area (citation). In contrast, the mite Arrenurus claviger, although invariably found on the abdomen, was also occasionally found, in small numbers, further forward on the thorax (Botman et al. 2002; Zawal 2006). In Coenagrion pulchellum, Ischnura elegans and Erythromma najas water mites always appear on the thorax. In Enallagma cyathigerum and Erythromma najas greater intensity of infestation by water mites is also found on the thorax than on the abdomen (Zawal 2006; Zawal and Dyatlova 2006). In Brachythemis contaminata and Trithemis pallidinervis mites were found all over the ventral abdominal region. Similarly, in Lestes sponsa, water mites are almost exclusively attached to the abdomen. Zawal (2004, 2006) proposed that the posture of the host during oviposition determines the location of the mite on the body, while Mitchell (1969 a,b) observed that the part of the body (thorax or abdomen) that comes out of the exuvia most slowly during adult eclosion determines the segregation of mites on the specific site. According to Smith (1998) each species of 196

Ectoparasitism of anisopteran dragonflies by water mite larvae of Arrenurus spp. Figs 1 6. Arrenurus sp. mite infestation (arrows) on anisopteran dragonflies: 1 Brachythemis contaminata female with heavy infestation over the abdomen; 2 Crocothemis servilia male with a single Arrenurus sp. mite attached to the thorax; 3 Crocothemis servilia female with a cluster of Arrenurus mites on the thorax (note the triangular shape of the cluster); 4 same as previous (note the V-shaped cluster); 5 Trithemis pallidinervis female abdomen loaded with Arrenurus mites; 6 Trithemis pallidinervis male with heavy infestation of Arrenurus mites on the thorax and abdomen. mite has a clearly defined attachment site but initial contact could be made at an alternative site. The mites tend to occupy species-specific attachment site, rather than choosong a random site. Choice of different sites reduces interspecific competition for feeding and growing space. Although in some Anisoptera, like Sympetrum fonscolombeii and Sympetrum meridionale, mites are always located on the wings (Abro 1982; Corbet 1999), such condition was never observed in the 204 dragonflies observed in the present investigation. The abundance of parasitic larvae on the bodies of adult odonates varied distinctly according to the time of collection. In the present study, the higher number of larvae were recorded in March April then in August September. In conrast, Zawal (2004, 2006), recorded the greatest number of larvae in June July. During the post-monsoon season, a total of 141 mites were found on 7 individuals (20 per individual), whereas in the summer collection a total of 324 mites were found on 7 individuals (46.3 per individual). Heavy parasitism was observed in Trithemis pallidinervis and Crocothemis servilia in March April and August September. According to Corbet (1999) mites infest male and female Odonata apparently without 197

R.J. Andrew, N. Thaokar, P. Verma bias. Rolff (2000) and McKef et al. (2003) also found unbiased distribution of mites on odonates. In the present study 71% of the August September collection of infested odonates were females. In March April 87.7% infested odonates were females. Robb and Forbes (2006), Lajeunesse et al. (2004) and Forbes et al. (2004) and this study found significant differencesin numbers, with mites apparently preferring females to males (p=10%). There are probably two major reasons for this: on host males mites mature early and detach readily from the body in humid conditions, probably when they fly over a water body (Rehfeldt, 1995); host females have to return to water to oviposit, while the males may or may not accompany females [depending upon the male guarding (contact and non-contact) and solitary oviposition behavior during oviposition]. Therefore it would be of major advantage for the mites to show a female-biased parasitism in order to return to water easily and continue the aquatic part of their life cycle. All the infected dragonflies species described in this paper (A. panorpoides, B. contaminata, C. servilia, D. trivialis, N. t. tullia and T. pallidinervis) exhibit solitary or non-contact guarding behaviour during oviposition. REFERENCES Abro, A. 1982. The effect of parasitic water mite larvae (Arrenurus spp.) on Zygopteran imagoes (Odonata). J. Invertebr. Pathol, 39: 373 381. Andre, J. and Cordero, A. 1998. Effects of water mite on damselfly Ceriagrion tenellum. Ecol. Ent., 23: 103 109. Bakers, R.L., Forbes, M.R. and Rutherford, P.L. 2007. Do larval damselflies make adaptive choices when exposed to both parasites and predators? Ethology, 113: 1073 1080. Bonn, A., Gasse, M., Rolff, J., and Martens, A. 1996. Increase fluctuation asymmetry (FA) in the damselfly Coenagrion puella correlated with ectoparasite water mites: implication for fluctuation asymmetry theory. Oecologia, 108: 596 598. Botman, G., Coenen, L. and Lanciani, C.A. 2002. Parasitism of Ichnura posita (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) in Florida by two species of water mites. Fla Ent., 85: 279 280. Corbet, P.S. 1999. Dragonflies: behavior and ecology of Odonata. Harley Books, England. 829 pp. Davids, C. 1997. The influence of larval parasitism on life history strategies in water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia). Arch. Hydrobiol., 141: 35 43. Forbes, M.R. 1991. The use of parasitic mites to age dragonflies. Am. Midl. Nat., 82: 359 366. Forbes, M.R., Muma, K.E. and Smith, B.P. 2004. Recapture male and female dragonflies in relation to parasitism by mites, time of season, wing-length and wing cell asymmetry. Exp. Appl. Entomol., 34: 79 93. Lajeunesse, M.J., Forbes, M.R. and Smith, B.P. 2004. Ectoparasitism of damselflies by water mite in central Florida. Florida Entomology, 90 (4): 643 649. McKef, D., Harvey, L., Thomas, M., and Sherratt, T.N. 2003. Mite infestation of Xanthocnemis zealandica in a Chritschurch pool. N. Z. J. Zool., 30: 17 20. Mitchell, R.D. 1969a. A model accounting for sympatry in water mites. Am. Nat., 104: 425 431. Mitchell, R.D. 1969b. Population regulation of larval water mites. In: G.O. Evans (Ed.). Proc. 2 nd Int. Congress of Acarology. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, p. 99 102. Münchberg, P. 1935. Zur Kenntnis der Odonaten-Parasiten, mit ganz besonder Berückischtigung der Ökolong der in Europa an Libellen schmarotzenden Wassermibelarven. Arch. Hydrobiol., 29: 1 122. Smith, I.M. and Oliver, D.R. 1976. The parasitic associations of larval water mites with imaginal aquatic insect, especially Chironomidae. Can. Ent., 108: 1427 1442. Smith, I.M. and Oliver, D.R. 1986. Review of parasitic associations of larval water mites (Acari: Parasitengona: Hydrachnidia) with insect host. Can. Ent., 118: 407 472. Smith, I.M. 1988. Host parasite interaction and impact on larval water mite on insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 33: 487 507. Rehfeldt, G. 1995. Naturliche Feinde, Parasiten und Fortpflanzen von Libellen. Wolfram Schmidt, Braunschweig. Rolff, J. 2000. Water mites parasitism in damselflies during emergence: two hosts, one pattern. Ecography, 23 (3): 273 282. Robb, T. and Forbes, M.R. 2006. Sex basis in parasitism of newly emerged damselflies. Ecosci., 13: 1 4. Rutherford, P.L., Baker, R.L. and Forbes, M.R. 2007. Do larval damselflies make adaptive choices when exposed to both parasites and predators? Ethology, 113: 1073 1080. Zawal, A. 2004. Parasitizing of dragonflies by water mite larvae of the genus Arrenurus in the neighborhood of the Barlinek (NW Poland). Zool. Poloniae, 49: 37 45. Zawal, A. 2006. Phoresy and parasitism: water mite larvae of the genus Arrenurus (Acari: Hydrachnidia) on Odonata from Lake Binowskie (NW Poland). Biological letters, 43 (2): 257 276. Zawal, A. and Dyatlova, E.S. 2006. Preliminary data for parasitizing on Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden, 1820) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) by Arrenurus (Acari: Hydrachnidia) larvae from Odessa province (Southwestern Ukraine). Proc. II Int. Sympo. Ecol. Montenegro: 17 20. 198