Lithuania s biodiversity at risk

Similar documents
Cyprus biodiversity at risk

Romania s biodiversity at risk

ESIA Albania Annex 11.4 Sensitivity Criteria

IUCN SSC Red List of Threatened Species

International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)

Biodiversity and Extinction. Lecture 9

THE RED BOOK OF ANIMALS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA

The threats to Australia s imperilled species and implications for a national conservation response

European Red List of Habitats

Metadata Sheet: Extinction risk (Indicator No. 9)

AMITY. Biodiversity & Its Conservation. Lecture 23. Categorization of Biodiversity - IUCN. By Prof. S. P. Bajpai. Department of Environmental Studies

Black-footed Ferret Mustela nigripes

Madagascar Spider Tortoise Updated: January 12, 2019

Guidelines for including species of conservation concern in the Environmental Assessment process

Required and Recommended Supporting Information for IUCN Red List Assessments

Northern Copperhead Updated: April 8, 2018

Criteria for Selecting Species of Greatest Conservation Need

The GB Invasive Non-native Species Strategy. Olaf Booy GB Non-native Species Secretariat

GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF RED LIST DATA

Endangered and Endemic Species of India (8 Marks)

Striped Skunk Updated: April 8, 2018

IUCN Red List. Industry guidance note. March 2010

II, IV Yes Reptiles Marine Atlantic, Marine Macaronesian, Marine Mediterranean

Living Planet Report 2018

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

Erin Maggiulli. Scientific Name (Genus species) Lepidochelys kempii. Characteristics & Traits

November 6, Introduction

TURKISH RED LIST CATEGORIES OF LONGICORN BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) PART I SUBFAMILIES VESPERINAE AND PRIONINAE.

Lecture 15. Biology 5865 Conservation Biology. Ex-Situ Conservation

Eating pangolins to extinction

Tortoises And Freshwater Turtles: The Trade In Southeast Asia (Species In Danger) By Martin Jenkins READ ONLINE

Abbreviations and acronyms used by SSC and IUCN

The Importance Of Atlasing; Utilizing Amphibian And Reptile Data To Protect And Restore Michigan Wetlands

Key terms and concepts in the IUCN Red List Criteria. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

From raw data to Red List: The Red List assessment process and role of the Red List Assessor. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

General presentation of the OIE

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species - An Overview

Local Conservation Action leads to Breeding Success for Critically Endangered BAER S POCHARD at Hengshui Hu.

2019 Catalogue. For more information: Melissa Bauman Naturalist I (419) ext. 223

OIE Reference Centres : General Overview

Reptiles Notes. Compiled by the Davidson College Herpetology Laboratory

Malayan Tiger Updated: April 8, 2018

Some new species are found, but they are endangered too: A selective show and tell of Amphibians and Reptiles of the World.

A GLOBAL VETERINARY EDUCATION TO COPE WITH SOCIETAL NEEDS

PETITION TO LIST THE Virgin Islands Coqui (Eleutherodactylus schwartzi)

A.13 BLAINVILLE S HORNED LIZARD (PHRYNOSOMA BLAINVILLII)

July 28, Dear Dr. Nouak,

VANCOUVER ISLAND MARMOT

Ways to escape. EPP Congress 30 May 1 June, 2012, Vilnius,Lithuania

Role and responsibilities of the veterinarian in the aquatic sector The OIE perspective

THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES: STRATEGIC PLAN

THE JAPANESE CRANE. endangered species L ARCHE PHOTOGRAPHIQUE CHARACTERISTICS

OIE activities related to wildlife and biodiversity

Proponent: Switzerland, as Depositary Government, at the request of the Animals Committee (prepared by New Zealand)

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

European Facts & Figures

Council of the European Union Brussels, 13 June 2016 (OR. en)

PE1561/J. Ned Sharratt Public Petitions Clerks Room T3.40 The Scottish Parliament Edinburgh EH99 1SP. 11 December 2015.

Recognizing that the government of Mexico lists the loggerhead as in danger of extinction ; and

5/10/2013 CONSERVATION OF CRITICALLY ENDANGERED RUFFORD SMALL GRANT. Dr. Ashot Aslanyan. Project leader SPECIES OF REPTILES OF ARARAT VALLEY, ARMENIA

VANCOUVER ISLAND MARMOT

Supplemental Information for the Sims Sink/Santa Fe Cave Crayfish Biological Status Review Report

The Pacific islands: an analysis of the status of species as listed on the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

4 Many species of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish 940L. Source 1 Habitats

Current Status of Amphibian Populations. Amphibian biology - characteristics making

The European AMR Challenge - strategic views from the human perspective -

Anas clypeata (Northern Shoveler)

Ssssneaky, Pesssky, S speciesss! Objectives: Sneak Peek Aligned with the following Sunshine State Standards and FCAT Benchmarks for grades 6-8:

Transfer of the Family Platysternidae from Appendix II to Appendix I. Proponent: United States of America and Viet Nam. Ref. CoP16 Prop.

Introduction. Chapter 1

Writing: Lesson 31. Today the students will be learning how to write more advanced middle paragraphs using a variety of elaborative techniques.

EurEau s Contribution to the European Commission s Strategic Approach on Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in the Environment

Promoting One Health : the international perspective OIE

110th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1464

Commercial Collection. & Pit Fall Trap Updates. Jason L. Jones Herpetologist 23 June 2017 Commission Update

State of the Turtle Raising Awareness for Turtle Conservation

Small-mouthed Salamander Ambystoma texanum

Council Conclusions on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) 2876th EMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL POLICY, HEALTH AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS Council meeting

Natural Selection. What is natural selection?

Surveys for Giant Garter Snakes in Solano County: 2005 Report

Reptiles of Mauritius

GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF IUCN RED LIST DATA

A.13 BLAINVILLE S HORNED LIZARD (PHRYNOSOMA BLAINVILLII)

A Bycatch Response Strategy

WILDLIFE HEALTH AUSTRALIA (WHA) SUBMISSION: AUSTRALIA S STRATEGY FOR NATURE (DRAFT)

Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 53, No th March, NOTICE THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE SPECIES (GREEN TURTLE) NOTICE, 2014

CONTRIBUTION TO THE RED LIST OF PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY OF ASTRAGALUS GAHIRATENSIS ALI (FABACEAE-PAPILIONOIDEAE)

The Australian Freshwater Turtle Catalogue. Edition

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of the Middle-European Population of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda)

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ADMINISTRATIONS [1], ASSOCIATIONS AND OTHER ORGANISATIONS

REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF INTEREST SOUTH FLORIDA-CARIBBEAN CESU NETWORK NUMBER W912HZ-16-SOI-0007 PROJECT TO BE INITIATED IN FY 2016

African Chelonian Institute: aims for conservation of turtles, tortoises and terrapins on the African continent

The general Information of the OIE (Organization, Roles, Mandate, Functions and 5 th Strategic Plan)

Steps Towards a Blanding s Turtle Recovery Plan in Illinois: status assessment and management

Table of Threatened Animals in Amazing Animals in Australia s National Parks and Their Traffic-light Conservation Status

ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF A EUROPEAN GOOSE MANAGEMENT PLATFORM UNDER AEWA ( )

SLOW DOWN, LOVE WIZARD. HERE S WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE HORNED LIZARD.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Transcription:

Lithuania s biodiversity at risk A call for action Lithuania hosts a large proportion of the species that are threatened at the European level, and has the important responsibility for protecting these species within its territory. Species in Lithuania require greater action to improve their status. While many species already receive some conservation attention, others do not. Species can be saved from extinction but this requires a combination of sound research and carefully coordinated efforts. Lithuania as an EU Member State has committed to halting biodiversity loss by 2020 but urgent action is needed to meet this target and better monitoring capacity is required to measure if the target is met. Considerable conservation investment is needed from Lithuania to ensure that the status of European species improves in the long term. This document provides an overview of the conservation status of species in Lithuania based on the results of all European Red Lists completed to date. It does not provide the status of the species in the country, therefore we invite the reader to cross check national and subnational Red Lists. Together, they can be used to help guide policies and local conservation strategies. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES

The European Red List The European Red List of Species is a review of the conservation status of more than 6,000 species in Europe according to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria and the regional Red Listing guidelines. It identifies species that are threatened with extinction at the European level so that appropriate conservation actions can be taken to improve their status. The geographical scope is continent-wide, including European parts of the Russian Federation and Turkey as well as the Macaronesian Islands. The Caucasus region is not included. To date, European regional assessments have been completed for all mammals, reptiles, amphibians, butterflies, dragonflies, freshwater fishes and freshwater molluscs and a selection of saproxylic beetles, terrestrial molluscs, and vascular plants. Assessments of pollinators, medicinal plants, birds and marine fishes are currently under development. The European Red List is compiled by IUCN Global Species Programme, with funding from the European Commission. Conservation status Lithuania is host to an estimated 30,000 species of animals and plants. This number represents 19% of the total species described for Europe and could represent more than 2% of the species in the world. According to the table below, approximately 13% of the species assessed by the European Red List of Species are present in Lithuania. For some of the taxonomic groups, the percentages of European species that occur in Lithuania are particularly high; such as dragonflies, butterflies and mammals. European status of species in Lithuania Of the 779 species assessed that occur in Lithuania, the groups comprising the highest number of species are vascular plants, dragonflies, butterflies and saproxylic beetles. Of the total number of species assessed in the country 3%* are considered threatened and at least 6% are Near Threatened at the European level. Many of these species are endemic to Europe and are found nowhere else in the world. Species that are considered threatened at the European level and occur in Lithuania are found mostly in wetlands, forests and grasslands. These ecosystems require particular attention in order to ensure the habitats of these sensitive species remain. Number of species assessed within each IUCN Red List category at the European level Species group No. of sp. in Europe No. of sp. in Lithuania % of European sp. occurring in Lithuania No. of threatened sp. in Lithuania (status at European level) CR EN VU Mammals 233 63 27% 0 1 3 Reptiles 140 7 5% 0 0 0 Amphibians 83 11 13% 0 0 0 Freshwater fishes 522 50 10% 1 0 1 Butterflies 435 116 27% 0 2 5 Dragonflies 137 137 45% 0 0 1 Saproxylic beetles** 431 107 25% 0 1 2 Terrestrial molluscs** 1,233 36 3% 0 0 2 Freshwater molluscs 854 64 7% 1 0 1 Vascular plants** 1,826 264 14% 0 1 1 TOTAL 5,894 779 13% 2 5 16 **Not comprehensively assessed, selected species only. This table does not include the Not Applicable (NA) species in Europe (species introduced after AD 1500 or species of marginal occurrence). The data are based on the results of the European Red List (European region wide assessment). 2

Major threats Habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation are the most significant threats at the European level to species that occur in Lithuania. For freshwater species, major threats include pollution due to agricultural and forestry effluents, abstraction of water from underground or from the streams. Other major threats come from logging and wood harvesting and residential and commercial development. Major threats at the European level to species occurring in Lithuania 3

Mammals Lithuania hosts 27% of all the mammals that occur in Europe. Of these 63 species of mammals, 7%* are threatened at the European level and at least an additional 5% are considered Near Threatened. The major threats at the European level that can possibly (or potentially) affect mammals in Lithuania are invasive and other problematic species, both native and non-native. Mammal populations are also highly threatened mainly by habitat degradation due to agriculture expansion and intensification. Natural system modifications, urban development and pollution caused by industrial and agricultural effluents. Reptiles Reptile species in Lithuania represent 5% of all the reptiles in Europe. The conservation status of reptiles in Lithuania based on the European Red List data is relatively good since none of them are considered threatened and only 14% are classified as Near Threatened. Habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation especially due to agricultural intensification and urbanization are the main threats to this group at the European level. It is also interesting to note that at least 29% of the reptile species in Lithuania may be threatened by human persecution and control, especially snakes. 4

Amphibians Amphibians in Lithuania represent 13% of all amphibians occurring in Europe. The conservation status of amphibians in Lithuania based on the European Red List data is relatively good since none of them are considered threatened and all are classified as Least Concern. The main threat to this group at the European level is the loss and degradation of suitable breeding habitat mainly due to agricultural activities and water pollution by agrochemicals. LC 100% Freshwater fishes Freshwater fishes are one of the most threatened groups at the European level. Four percent* of the species that occur in Lithuania are threatened at the European level, while the percentage of total threatened species that is observed in the European region is 40%*. Additionally, freshwater fishes have a high percentage of endemism in the European region: up to 80%. The most important threat to this group at the European level is water pollution, specially the one coming from agricultural and industrial effluents. Change of water flow patterns due to dam construction, Invasive and other problematic species, both native and non-native also pose serious threats to freshwater fishes in the country. 5

Butterflies Lithuania hosts 27% of all butterfly species in Europe and 7%* of them are considered threatened at the European level. The conservation status of butterflies in Lithuania based on the European Red List data is relatively good since 6% of butterfly species are classified as Near Threatened, and 88% are considered as Least Concern. Butterflies have very specific food and habitat requirements at different stages of their life cycle so they are very sensitive to changes in their environment. Habitat degradation caused by inappropriate ecosystem management and agriculture intensification, increasing droughts and fires are the main threats to this group. Dragonflies Forty-five percent of all the dragonflies in Europe are present in Lithuania. Two percent* of the dragonflies that occur in Lithuania are considered threatened at the European level. This group is adversely affected by desiccation caused by dry weather and increased water abstraction of ground water. River species are also affected by water quality deterioration due to agricultural effluents and habitat degradation as a result of agricultural expansion and intensification. 6

Saproxylic beetles Twenty-five percent of the beetle species assessed by the European Red List are present in Lithuania. Approximately 3%* of the species in this group are considered threatened at the European level, which is less than half of the percentage of threatened saproxylic beetle species in Europe, and none of them are Critically Endangered. Twelve percent of them are considered as Near Threatened. The saproxylic beetles are very dependent on the dynamics of tree aging and wood decay processes. The major threat to this group is logging and wood harvesting; therefore these beetles require sensitive conservation management of tree populations irrespective of their situation. Terrestrial molluscs Six percent* of the terrestrial molluscs assessed that are present in Lithuania are threatened and 6% are Near Threatened at the European level. The major threat to this group at the European level is habitat loss and degradation as a result of agricultural expansion and intensification and natural or semi natural ecosystem management. 7

Freshwater molluscs Seven percent of all the freshwater molluscs in Europe are present in Lithuania. Three percent* of the species in this group are considered threatened and 6% are classified as Near Threatened at the European level. Water pollution, especially the one coming from agricultural effluents and domestic and urban wastewater is the main threat to this group at the European level. Modification of the physical and chemical characteristics of freshwater rivers and lakes due to dam construction and other ecosystem modifications are also one of the major threats. Vascular plants At European level, priority crop wild relatives, aquatic plants and all species included in the annexes of the Habitats Directive, Bern Convention and CITES have been assessed. A total of 264 species are found in Lithuania, which represent 14% of the total of species assessed in Europe. One percent* of the 264 vascular plant species assessed in Lithuania are considered threatened at European level. For terrestrial plants, poor management of natural ecosystems and urban development have the worst impacts. For aquatic species, water quality deterioration caused by agricultural and forestry effluents are the main threats. 8

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE May 2013 Document prepared by Andrea Pino del Carpio, Silvia Sánchez, Ana Nieto and Melanie Bilz European Union Representative Office Boulevard Louis Schmidt 64 1040 Brussels, Belgium +32 2 739 03 13 For more information please contact: ana.nieto@iucn.org http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist and http://www.iucnredlist.org/europe The European Red List is a project funded by the European Commission. Cover photo by Amadej Trnkoczy (Agrimonia eupatoria) REFERENCES Bilz, M., Kell, S. P., Maxted, N. and Lansdown, R.V. 2011. European Red List of Vascular Plants. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Cox, N.A. and Temple, H.J. 2009. European Red List of Reptiles. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Cuttelod, A., Sheddon, M and E. Neubert. 2011. European Red List of Non-marine Molluscs. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Freyhof, J. and Brooks, E. 2011. European Red List of Freshwater Fishes. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Kalkman, V.J., Boudot, J-P., Bernard, R., Conze, K-J., De Knijf, G., Dyatlova, E., Ferreira, S., Jović, M., Ott, J., Riservato, E. and Sahlén, G. 2010. European Red List of Dragonflies. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Nieto, A and Alexander, K.N.A. 2009 European Red List of Saproxylic Beetles. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. van Swaay, C., Cuttelod, A., Collins, S., Maes, D., López Munguira, M., Šašić, M., Settele, J.,Verovnik, R., Verstrael, T., Warren, M., Wiemers, M. and Wynhoff, I. 2010. European Red List of Butterflies. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Temple, H.J. and Terry, A. 2009. The status and distribution of European mammals. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Temple, H.J. and Cox, N.A. 2009. European Red List of Amphibians. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. *The proportion of threatened species in this document is calculated as follows: (EW + CR + EN + VU) / (total number of species assessed - EX - RE - DD). Since the number of threatened species is often uncertain because it is not known whether DD species are actually threatened or not, this formula considers that DD species are equally threatened as data sufficient species.