Resolution Supporting Assembly Bill 2743, prohibiting the requirement of declawing or debarking of pets as a condition of tenancy

Similar documents
var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true}; The Ethics of Convenience By Eileen Jefferson, DVM December 6, 2011

CITY THE KITTY. the nonprofit. Strategic Plan

Position on Canine/Feline Devocalization ( Bark Softening, Voice Reduction )

EssayOnDeclawingCatsForStudents

Classification and Salary: Registered Veterinary Technician Classification

Medically Unnecessary Veterinary Surgery ( Cosmetic Surgery )

HOUSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY

Animals in Housing. Definition of Disability 10/5/2017. Disability (Handicap) means:

Canine Devocalization-Save The Voice

SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (SPCA) OF NORTH BREVARD May 26, 2009 POSITION STATEMENT

Policy. Pets in Strata Schemes

PET POLICY. Family Housing: Anderson Lane Apartments & Meadow Lane Apartments

DECLAWING THE LEGISLATURE: USING DIRECT INITIATIVE FOR THE BAN OR LIMITATION OF DECLAWING PRACTICES IN THE UNITED STATES BY: SAMANTHA PAYNE

REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION PET POLICY ELDERLY/DISABLED PROJECTS. Feeding of stray animals will be considered as having an unauthorized animal.

ASSEMBLY, No. 347 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

!! Equal Housing Opportunity

PET RULES. The Berkeley Housing Authority (BHA) prohibits the keeping of pets by tenants with the following exceptions:

Declawing is Cruelty. Imagine if it were a common procedure to have your child s fingers surgically removed.

This policy complies with the amended R.T.A. (January 1, 2004) which, as of that date, allows the administration and arbitration of a pet policy.

APPLICATION FOR RENTAL AGREEMENT & REGISTRATION

Russian Relief Association of St.Sergius of Radonezh

ASSISTANCE ANIMAL POLICY AND AGREEMENT

photo - Bob Crownfield

Cat Adoption Criteria

Requesting a the presence of a Service Animal or an Assistance Animal at EMCC

Name: Spouse/Partner s Name: Address: Home Phone: City/State/Zip: Work Phone: Address: Cell Phone: TX DL # : Employer:

Applicant #1: First Middle Last

Northwestern Michigan College Procedure for Service and Comfort Animals

FRISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY (Latest revision: 8/2017)

Adoption Application

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WILLIAMSON WILLIAMSON, WEST VIRGINIA PET OWNERSHIP POLICY

Chapter 10. PETS [24 CFR 5, Subpart C; 24 CFR 960, Subpart G]

CHAPTER 10: PETS [24 CFR 5, Subpart C; 24 CFR 960, Subpart G]

Services for Students with Disabilities Interpreting Services. Assistance Animal Policy

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Small Paws-Big Hearts

Neighbourhood Manager, Neighbourhoods Business Manager, Neighbourhoods Services Manager, Care and Support Business Manager, Care and Support

First Name: Last Name: Date:

Chapter 14 Pet Policy

FRANCISCAN VILLAGE ANIMAL OWNERSHIP RULES

Exhibit 6-2 Policy Overview

PET POLICY [24 CFR 5, Subpart C; 24 CFR 960, Subpart G]

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney REPORT NO.

PEOPLE CENTER ANIMAL POLICY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY

REPORT TO COUNCIL City of Sacramento

Pet Policy of the Stonehenge Subdivision

CAT ADOPTION APPLICATION

CAT ADOPTION APPLICATION

MONAHANS HOUSING AUTHORITY PET OWNERSHIP POLICY (Revised 6/14/2016)

Total number of children in your home: Ages of children:

Application For Adoption

A Guide for Landlords and Managing Agents. Tenants. Pets. with

A Guide for Landlords and Managing Agents. Tenants. Pets. with

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Dog Adoption Criteria

ADOPTION APPLICATION

Guideline to Supplement to Codes of Practice Greyhound Euthanasia

EXEMPTION FROM THE PET RULES FOR SERVICE AND COMPANION ANIMALS

CARMEN A. TRUTANICH City Attorney

ESA (Emotional Support Animal)

Adoption Application/Contract

Adoption Application Form and Contract

Introduction. What is a nuisance?

1.1 This policy sets out Peabody s approach to pet ownership within our properties.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY OF RICE (REGULATING DOGS & CATS)

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

A DIRECTOR S GUIDE TO PETS IN CONDOMINIUMS

Office of Disability Support Services dss.catholic.edu Guidelines for Support Animals

Laredo Animal Protective Society 2500 Gonzalez Street Laredo, TX (956)

Everybody needs good neighbours

Dog Adoption Application for

Owner The Owner is the student who has requested the accommodation and has received approval to bring an ESA into University Housing.

MEMORANDUM JOHN ROGERS, RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR HEATHER WHITHAM, CITY ATTORNEY DAVID HIRSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

FINAL DECISION AND SECTION 43 STATEMENT TO THE VETERINARY COUNCIL BY THE COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE Dr B. CAC (Complaint by Mr A)

CHRONIC NON-HEALING STUMP GRANULOMA ON A DOCKTED TAIL OF A DOBERMAN PINTURE

Remember all animals must be PRE-APPROVED!

BYLAW NO SUMMER VILLAGE OF YELLOWSTONE DOG AND CAT CONTROL BYLAW

Dog Ownership. Barking. Health. Fouling. * Provide your dog with safe and. * Walk your dog at least twice a day * Keep your dog inside when you are

At what phone number(s) may we reach you in case of emergency?

Companion Animal Welfare Student Activities

Total number of children in your home: Ages of children:

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Identifying Best Practice Domestic Cat Management in Australia

DOG ADOPTION APPLICATION

Animal Rights IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR INSIDE. Municipal Laws Provincial Laws Criminal Law Questions and Answers Adoption and Rescue Centres

Questionaire Please complete prior to calling about adult. adoptionnaire. For Adult Adoption Only Adoption

Section 1. The Revised General Ordinances of the Township of West Orange are amended and supplemented to read as follows:

ITEM NO H yn/frc. Committ. Council File No: Submitted in. Date:

Keeping Pets in Your Home

Bylaw No. 641, Amendment to 605 Dog Control Bylaw

MANDATORY SPAY/NEUTER ORDINANCE FOR CATS AND DOGS OVER 4 MONTHS

Tell us about your family or household

Action Item. Board of Trustees and Superintendent of Schools. James Koenig, Director Student Support Services

Service and Assistance Animal in Housing Packet

Chapter 10. PETS [24 CFR 5, Subpart C; 24 CFR 960, Subpart G]

Virtual Shelter Project You Can Save Your Pet s Life Without A Shelter.

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

CAT ADOPTION APPLICATION

GREYHOUND ADOPTION APPLICATION

IACUC Policy on Humane Endpoints in Animal Use Proposals

Transcription:

Jesse Arreguín Councilmember, District 4 CONSENT CALENDAR June 22, 2010 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Subject: Councilmember Jesse Arreguín Resolution Supporting Assembly Bill 2743, prohibiting the requirement of declawing or debarking of pets as a condition of tenancy RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution supporting Assembly Bill 2743, introduced by Assemblymember Pedro Nava, prohibiting property owners from requiring tenants to declaw or debark their pets as a condition of tenancy. BACKGROUND: Some residential building owners and landlords will only consider renting to a potential tenant if their pet is declawed or debarked. Declawing or onychectomy, is an operation to surgically remove an animal s claws by means of amputating all of or part of the distal phalanx, or end bones, of the animal s toes. Eight local governments in California, including the City of Berkeley, have recently banned the practice of cat declawing, recognizing the practice as inhumane. Physical problems and surgical complications are associated with declawing, including hemorrhage, infection, chronic pain, and lameness and scientific studies have shown that declawed cats have an increased tendency to bite after being declawed. Devocalization also known as debarking, bark softening, ventriculocordectomy and vocal cordectomy, is a surgical procedure applied to dogs and cats, where tissue is removed from the animal s vocal cords in order to permanently reduce the volume of their vocalizations. Multiple physical and behavioral symptoms are associated with devocalizing, including the increased risk of aspiration pneumonia, breathing difficulties, chronic coughing and gagging, and increased risk of threats to physical safety because of the inability to ward off threats by vocalizing. These outcomes do not support the intended purpose of declawing an animal in order to protect people and furnishings or the intended purpose of devocalization to reduce the degree of disturbance a pet causes. 2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 Tel: (510) 981-7140 TDD: (510) 981-6903 Fax: (510) 981-7144 E-Mail: jarreguin@cityofberkeley.info

Declawing and/or devocalization of animals is associated with significant human health and safety concerns as well as making an animal more likely to lose its home because of the unintended consequences that often result from these practices. Assembly Bill (AB) 2743, introduced by Assemblymember Pedro Nava, would make it illegal in the State of California for a landlord to require declawing or devocalization as a condition of tenancy. A civil fine of $2,500 would be assessed for each instance of declawing or devocalization as a result of a landlord-tenant agreement. AB 2743 is supported by a broad coalition including the Humane Society of the United States; the Paw Project; Companion Animal Protection Society; the California Apartment Association; the Western Center on Law and Poverty; the City of West Hollywood and the City of Santa Monica. Berkeley has a long history of advocating for the fair treatment of animals and should join other cities in expressing its support for AB 2743 to prevent the inhumane practice of declawing and debarking and promote a better quality of life for animals. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: NONE CONTACT PERSON: Jesse Arreguín, Councilmember, District 4 981-7140 Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Copy of Assembly Bill 2743

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S. SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY BILL 2743 PROHIBITING THE REQUIREMENT OF DECLAWING OR DEBARKING OF PETS AS A CONDITION OF TENANCY WHEREAS, some residential building owners and landlords will only consider renting to a potential tenant if their pet is declawed or debarked ; and WHEREAS, "declawing" or onychectomy, is an operation to surgically remove an animal's claws by means of amputating all of or part of the distal phalanx, or end bones, of the animal's toes; and WHEREAS, eight local governments in California, including the City of Berkeley, have recently banned the practice of cat declawing, recognizing the practice as inhumane; and WHEREAS, physical problems and surgical complications are associated with declawing, including hemorrhage, infection, chronic pain, and lameness and scientific studies have shown that declawed cats have an increased tendency to bite after being declawed; and WHEREAS, "devocalization" (also known as debarking, bark softening, ventriculocordectomy and vocal cordectomy) is a surgical procedure applied to dogs and cats, where tissue is removed from the animal's vocal cords in order to permanently reduce the volume of their vocalizations; and WHEREAS, multiple physical and behavioral symptoms are associated with devocalizing, including the increased risk of aspiration pneumonia, breathing difficulties, chronic coughing or gagging, and increased risk of threats to physical safety because of the inability to ward off threats by vocalizing; and WHEREAS, these outcomes do not support the intended purpose of declawing an animal in order to protect people and furnishings or the intended purpose of devocalization to reduce the degree of disturbance a pet causes; and WHEREAS, the declawing and/or devocalization of animals is associated with significant human health and safety concerns as well as making an animal more likely to lose its home because of the unintended consequences that often result from these practices; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill (AB) 2743, introduced by Assemblymember Pedro Nava, would make it illegal in the State of California for a landlord to require declawing or devocalization as a condition of tenancy; and WHEREAS, a civil fine of $2,500 will be assessed for each instance of declawing or devocalization as a result of a landlord-tenant agreement; and

WHEREAS, AB 2743 is supported by a broad coalition including the Humane Society of the United States; the Paw Project; Companion Animal Protection Society; the California Apartment Association; the Western Center on Law and Poverty; the City of West Hollywood and the City of Santa Monica; and WHEREAS, the City of Berkeley has a long history of advocating for the fair treatment of animals and should joins other cities in expressing its support for AB 2743 to prevent the inhumane practice of declawing and debarking and promote a better quality of life for animals. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Berkeley hereby supports AB 2743, introduced by Assemblymember Pedro Nava, to prohibit the requirement of declawing or debarking of pets as a condition of tenancy. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be sent to Senate President Pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg, Senator Loni Hancock, Assembly Speaker John A. Perez and Assemblymember Nancy Skinner.