Water vole survey on Laughton Level via Mill Farm

Similar documents
Property and infrastructure 1. INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Background. 1.2 Survey Site. Date

Water Vole Translocation Project: Abberton ReservoirAbout Water Voles Population Dynamics

Mr T.B Brown. Land off Turweston Road, Northamptonshire REPTILE SURVEY REPORT

Appendix 8.B Great Crested Newt Survey Report

Rat Control & Water Vole Conservation

Water voles in the North Pennines. Where they can be found, what they need to survive and how you can help.

Appendix 6.4. Reptile Survey

REPTILE TRANSLOCATION REPORT. Hoggett s End, Bishop s Stortford, Hertfordshire

Reptile Method Statement

VIRIDOR WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITED. Parkwood Springs Landfill, Sheffield. Reptile Survey Report

London Wildlife Trust

A REPTILE SURVEY AT THE LAND AT HILL ROAD AND ELM TREE DRIVE, ROCHESTER, KENT,

Hallam Land Management, Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd, William Davis, Connolly Homes and. Bellcross Homes. South West Milton Keynes REPTILE REPORT

Slater M. (2007) 149 Norton Leys, Rugby CV22 5RS, UK SUMMARY

Native British Reptile Species

What is the date at which most chicks would have been expected to fledge?

Derwent Forest Reptile Survey Report. November 2009

Teynham, Sittingbourne,, Kent. Reptile Survey. 02 nd October 2015 / Ref No 2015/07/13 Client: Hobbs Parker Property Consultants LLP

Amphibians & reptiles. Key points

Introduction. Current Status

Water Vole Information and Education Pack

British Reptiles. By Sue Searle

Appendix 8.5 Reptile Survey Report

Volunteer Starter Pack Volunteer Health & Safety Guidance

Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 53, No th March, NOTICE THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE SPECIES (GREEN TURTLE) NOTICE, 2014

Physical Description Meadow voles are small rodents with legs and tails, bodies, and ears.

AUGUST 2016 Ashford Park Quarry Pest Plant and Animal Control Plan

The grey partridges of Nine Wells. A study of one square kilometre of arable land south of Addenbrooke s Hospital in Cambridge

Reptile Method Statement Land at the De Winton Hotel Llanbradach Caerphilly Dated September 2015

Padgbury Lane North, Congleton REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY

Survey Manual for Water Vole Spotters

Greenham Common, Crookham Common and Bowdown Wood Reptile Survey 2010

For further information on the biology and ecology of this species, Clarke (1995) provides a comprehensive account.

LAND AT REAR OF PARAPET HOUSE LENHAM KENT REPTILE SCOPING SURVEY

Breeding success of Greylag Geese on the Outer Hebrides, September 2016

Hares: Ecology and Survey

The role of trees in sheep farming

Bog Turtles: Muck, Man and Management. Pamela Shellenberger Biological Technician U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Site Risk Assessment Record

BOBWHITE QUAIL HABITAT EVALUATION

Appendix 8.18 Reptile Survey Report 2014

LITTLE ACRE 80 THE STREET KENNINGTON ASHFORD KENT: REPTILES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR A PRESENCE/ ABSENCE SURVEY FOR THE DESERT TORTOISE (Gopherus agassizii),

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE BROOD-REARING HABITAT MANIPULATION IN MOUNTAIN BIG SAGEBRUSH, USE OF TREATMENTS, AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY ON PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH

Woodcock: Your Essential Brief

The grey partridges of Nine Wells: A five-year study of a square kilometre of arable land south of Addenbrooke s Hospital in Cambridge

Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 53, No th March, NOTICE THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE SPECIES (OLIVE RIDLEY TURTLE) NOTICE, 2014

Raptor Ecology in the Thunder Basin of Northeast Wyoming

Nest Site Creation and Maintenance as an Effective Tool in Species Recovery

Inside this issue. Swallows and Martins in August

Gambel s Quail Callipepla gambelii

BASFORD EAST, CREWE GREAT CRESTED NEWT SURVEY

COUNTRY LEGISLATION GIVING PROTECTION SCHEDULE OR

SARG Guide Surrey Amphibian and Reptile Group. SARG Reptile Surveyor s Guide Using SARGWEB. April 2012 Version 1.0. Steve Langham

2012 Quail Season Outlook By Doug Schoeling, Upland Game Biologist Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

Reptile Survey. Boverton, Vale of Glamorgan. For. Barratt Homes South Wales. Project No.: ABAW105 / 007. May

Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis)

European Red List of Habitats

PROTOCOL FOR SETT MONITORS (checking setts)

EIDER JOURNEY It s Summer Time for Eiders On the Breeding Ground

Brownfields and Butterflies Workshop. Jane Ellis Regional Officer (Brownfields) Butterfly Conservation Bill Bacon (Chairman) East Midlands Branch

Naturalised Goose 2000

Scottish Natural Heritage Diversionary feeding of hen harriers on grouse moors. a practical guide

Habitats and Field Methods. Friday May 12th 2017

The abundance and distribution of British Greylag Geese on Orkney, August 2013

Habitats and Field Techniques

7550: THE PLOUGH INN, BRABOURNE LEES, KENT BRIEFING NOTE: KCC ECOLOGY RESPONSE 17/01610/AS

Site Risk Assessment Record

PEREGRINE FALCONS. Guidelines on Urban Nest Sites and the Law. Based on a document produced by the Metropolitan Police

LLWR Ecology Framework

An Invasive Species For more information: MyFWC.com/iguana

VANCOUVER ISLAND MARMOT

Feral Animals in Australia. An environmental education and sustainability resource kit for educators

Hydraulic Report. County Road 595 Bridge over Yellow Dog River. Prepared By AECOM Brian A. Hintsala, P.E

INVERCARGILL CITY COUNCIL. Bylaw 2018/2 Dog Control

FALL 2015 BLACK-FOOTED FERRET SURVEY LOGAN COUNTY, KANSAS DAN MULHERN; U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Wildlife Management Activity Book

Geoffroy s Cat: Biodiversity Research Project

Guidelines for management activities in Swamp Skink habitat on the Mornington Peninsula.

Acorn Ecology Certificate Course Self-Study Tutorial. British Reptile & Amphibian ID ( and a bit about surveying too!)

Name. Period. Student Activity: Dichotomous Key. 1a. 1b. 2a. 2b. 3a. 3b. 4a. 4b. 5a. 5b. 6a. 6b. 7a. 7b. 8a.

SPECIES AT RISK IN ALBERTA. Children s Activity Booklet

COMMUNITY PARK AUDIT TOOL

The effectiveness of reptile exclusion techniques as revealed by photorecognition

BASC Code of Practice for the Use of a Dog Below Ground in England and Wales

Survey options Toad surveys Great Crested Newt edna survey: Great Crested Newt full survey:

Biology and conservation of the eastern long-necked turtle along a natural-urban gradient. Bruno O. Ferronato

INFORMATION SHEET PROTECTION OF BLACK-COCKATOO HABITAT

Native lizards on the Kapiti Coast

NORFOLK BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Ref 1/S8 Tranche 1 Species Action Plan 8 GREY PARTRIDGE

There are many different habitats. When you visit Knowsley Safari you may talk about the Savannah Grasslands, the Rainforests and the Deserts.

Rabbits and hares (Lagomorpha)

HAT HILL DOG OFF-LEASH AREA MODIFICATIONS

( 142 ) NOTES ON THE GREAT NORTHERN DIVER.

Mexican Gray Wolf Endangered Population Modeling in the Blue Range Wolf Recovery Area

ESRM 350 The Decline (and Fall?) of the White-tailed Jackrabbit

10/11/2010. Kevin Enge

LEVEL 2 AWARD IN THE SAFE USE OF RODENTICIDES

For further information on the biology and ecology of this species, Clarke (1996) provides a comprehensive account.

This Coloring Book has been adapted for the Wildlife of the Table Rocks

Transcription:

Water vole survey on Laughton Level via Mill Farm Grid reference: TQ 4911 Mill Farm, Ripe, East Sussex November 2008 Hetty Wakeford Ecologist Sussex Ecology

Introduction The Ecologist undertook a water vole survey on the Laughton Level under the ownership of Mill Farm. It was found that there is a potential of water voles being present. This report is split into: Survey methods and site information (on page 3) which provides details of the habitat types, landscape, survey methods etc. Survey results and data (on page 4) which provide details of all water vole field signs. Survey analysis (on page 5) which provides the reader with a breakdown of the data collected and future directions. Discussion (page 6) Maps (on pages 8 to 10) showing general area and ditches surveyed. Appendixes 1 7 (pages 11 to 15) Appendix 1: Vegetation cover of each watercourse Appendix 2: Bank profiles, water depths etc of each watercourse Appendix 3: Water vole signs found on each ditch Appendix 4: Comparison with previous data. Appendix 5: Pictures of water vole field signs in general Appendix 6: Pictures of water vole field signs from survey site Appendix 7: Picture of good quality water vole habitat from site Acknowledgements I would like to thank the landowners for their help and support during the survey. I would like to thank staff at the Sussex Biological Records Centre and Sussex Wildlife Trust for the data provided. 2

Survey methods and site information The Field Ecologist undertook a water vole survey on land under the ownership of Mill Farm in October 2008. This site is not within a Site of Special Scientific Interest Area (SSSI). It is, however, within the Low Weald and Pevensey Natural Area. Surveys are undertaken between April and October. In general, each watercourse is searched over a distance of 500 m as a minimum. In this survey, the average ditch length was 200 m. In total, 3 adjacent ditches, 2 ponds and one main watercourse was surveyed. One bank of each watercourse was searched for field signs. The main signs that were looked for were feeding piles, latrines and burrows. Latrines are droppings left to mark territory boundaries and active burrows during the breeding season. Feeding piles are heaps of chewed vegetation which are left in favoured places. A standard water vole survey form is used to record information such as bank profile, water depth and flow, surrounding habitats and bank side vegetation types. The water levels of the ditches were assessed with the use of a 2 m stick where access was permitted. Information on watercourses with health and safety concerns and/or poor access was obtained from the relevant landowners. Surveys were undertaken in good weather conditions. This is particularly important as field signs are washed away in very wet weather. Surrounding habitats were grasslands for grazing, temporary/permanent grassland and arable land. 3

Survey results and data All water vole field signs found ditches and ponds were recorded using a GPS 10 figure grid reference. These are outlined below. Survey results from 21 st October 2008 Grid ref Ditch no Field signs found TQ 5012211450 Ditch 1 Old feeding pile (unconfirmed) TQ 5011811454 Ditch 1 Chewed vegetation (unconfirmed) TQ 5009311483 Ditch 1 Chewed vegetation (unconfirmed) Ditch 2 Not surveyed due to poor access Ditch 3 Not surveyed due to poor access Pond 1 Not surveyed due to poor access Pond 2 Not surveyed due to poor access Pond 3 Not surveyed due to poor access 4

Survey analysis The survey has revealed that there is potential of water vole being present. The presence of water voles at a site is determined by a number of factors including suitability of habitat, absence of mink and the presence of other water vole colonies nearby. Some of these factors are discussed below. Water voles require bankside and marginal vegetation such as tall grasses, rushes, sedges and herbs. They require a large amount of plant cover. This provides them with food and shelter from predators. Scattered bankside trees/shrubs are important as these provide the voles with food over the winter, notably willow. Ditches which have become overgrown and scrubbed over are generally avoided. Water voles do not tolerate fluctuating water levels such as prolonged flooding or drought. Overall, the ditches under the ownership of Mill Farm were considered to be good quality habitat for water vole. This was based on the fact that there was abundant growth of reed, sedges, rushes, tall grasses, herbs and scattered bushes. Some potential signs were found on Ditch 1. However, the signs were insufficient to confirm the presence of water vole. This was based on the fact that no latrines were found. It is possible that the weather conditions may have influenced the survey results eg cold weather, wet conditions. However, this is unlikely as the survey was undertaken in mild weather with no recent precipitation. A search undertaken by Sussex Biological Records Centre revealed that there was a sighting reported in 2001 in the general area (approx 2 km). In 2005 there was a sighting reported near Glynde Reach (approx 2.5 km) [source Natural England]. Mink is a non-native species which has a major impact on water vole populations as a predator. Mink are believed to be present in the general area although no signs were found during the survey. 5

Summary There is potential of water voles being present on land under the ownership of Mill Farm. This has been based on the fact that field signs found were insufficient. There are other reports of water vole in the general area in 2001 and 2005. Future directions There is scope for repeating the survey to confirm the presence of water vole. I would suggest a survey in 2 3 years time. Water vole protection Water voles have undergone one of the fastest declines of any British mammal. Their numbers have crashed drastically over the last 25 years. Reasons for this decline include habitat loss, development, pollution and predation by mink. The water vole received limited legal protection in April 1998 through its inclusion in Schedule 5 of the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) for some offences. This protection has been extended (April 2008), so the water vole is now fully protected under Section 9. Legal protection makes it an offence to: intentionally kill, injure or take (capture) a water vole; possess or control a live or dead water vole, or any part of a water vole; intentionally or recklessly damage, destroy or obstruct access to any structure or place which water voles use for shelter or protection or disturb water voles while they are using such a place; sell, offer for sale or advertise for live or dead water voles. 6

Discussion The survey revealed that there is a potential of water voles being present. This has been based on the fact that no latrines were present on one ditch. Therefore, more evidence is required to confirm that water voles are definitely present. The majority of water vole field signs were present on one ditch. Water voles are known to move around a site depending on habitat management and water levels. It is possible that this is a factor influencing some survey results. The presence of water voles at a site is determined by a number of factors such as the availability of suitable habitats. It is likely that this is a factor as it was felt that the ditches were considered to be suitable habitat. Some ditches were considered unsuitable as they had dried out or were scrubbed over. Water voles are known to move into sub-optimal habitats later in the year as the best areas become full. Although no signs were found on these ditches, it is possible that water voles may use them as a migratory route. One ditch had poached banks on one side. Poaching of banks by livestock is detrimental to water voles as it results in the collapse of burrows and the bank profile is often altered. On sites which are heavily grazed bankside vegetation becomes sparse.

General area Ordnance Survey Crown Copyright (2008). All rights reserved. Licence number 100048403

Section adjacent to Cleaver s Bridge and Mark s Cross Blue = water voles not present; no signs found Green = water voles may be present (signs found have not been confirmed as water vole) Yellow = ditch/pond not surveyed due to poor access and/or health and safety concerns Ordnance Survey Crown Copyright (2008). All rights reserved. Licence number 100048403

Section adjacent to Lulham Cottage and Bridge Cottage Blue = water voles not present; no signs found Green = water voles may be present (signs found have not been confirmed as water vole) Yellow = ditch/pond not surveyed due to poor access and/or health and safety concerns Ordnance Survey Crown Copyright (2008). All rights reserved. Licence number 100048403 10

Appendix 1: vegetation cover present on each watercourse GRID REF Ditch no Bankside trees VEGETATION TYPES (DAFORN) Bushes Herbs Submerged Reeds/sedges weed Tall grasses Water voles present TQ500114 Ditch 1 Abundant Abundant Abundant None Frequent Abundant Unconfirmed TQ495109 Ditch 2 Rare Rare Abundant Occasional Abundant Abundant Unknown TQ497108 Ditch 3 Dominant Dominant Rare None None None Unknown TQ496112 Pond 1 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown TQ499116 Pond 2 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown TQ494108 Pond 3 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown KEY TO VEGETATION TYPES (DAFORN): Dominant = 81 100% cover Abundant = 61 80% cover Frequent = 41 60% cover Occasional = 21 40% cover Rare = 1 20% cover None = 0%

Appendix 2: Bank profiles, water depths and water flows of each watercourse Grid ref Ditch no Water depth Water flow Bank profile Shorebank type Bank fenced? Water voles present TQ500114 Ditch 1 1 2 m Slow Steep Earth Part Unconfirmed TQ495109 Ditch 2 1 2 m Static Steep Earth No Unknown TQ497108 Ditch 3 < 0.5 m Static Steep Earth Yes Unknown TQ496112 Pond 1 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown TQ499116 Pond 2 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown TQ494108 Pond 3 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown

Appendix 3: Field signs of water vole found on ditches GRID REF Ditch no Latrines Feeding piles Burrows Pathways in vegetation TQ 5012211450 Ditch 1 Old feeding pile (unconfirmed) TQ 5011811454 Ditch 1 Chewed vegetation (unconfirmed) TQ 5009311483 Ditch 1 Chewed vegetation (unconfirmed) Sighting 13

Appendix 4: Comparison of data with other years Grid ref Ditch no (2008) TQ 500114 Ditch 1 No records for this ditch. However, sighting reported in 2001 (approx 2 km away). Previous surveys* 2008 survey Data analysis and assumption Potential field signs found at TQ5012211450, TQ5011811454, TQ5009311483 Water vole known to be present in the general area. TQ 495109 Ditch 2 No records for this ditch. However, sighting reported (2 km away) in 2005 [source Natural England]. *Source of data: Sussex Biological Records Centre Section of ditch under ownership of Mill Farm not surveyed due to poor access. However, ditch was assessed as being good quality water vole habitat further downstream. Water vole known to be present in the general area.

Appendix 5: Water vole field signs Latrines and droppings Droppings vary in colour from green, brown or black depending on what has been eaten. They are always cylindrical with blunted ends. These are usually 8 12 mm long and 4 5 mm wide. Latrines are droppings which are deposited at maintained latrine sites between March to October. Latrines are left to mark territory boundaries and active burrows during the breeding season This picture was taken on a sluice pipe although latrines may be found on bare mud, along runs and outside burrows. Feeding piles Feeding piles are left in favoured places. They are neat piles of chopped vegetation. Vegetation is usually up to 10 cm long. Water vole will usually leave an angle at the end of the vegetation (but not always). Although this picture does not show it clearly, there are bits of vegetation with the typical angle. Field vole feeding remains are usually a few centimeters long and do not show the angle made by water vole. Photo: Hetty Wakeford Photo: Hetty Wakeford Please note that these pictures were not taken from the survey site. The latrine picture was taken on a site on Isle of Sheppey in 2005 and the feeding pile picture was taken at a site near Rye in 2007.