FALL 2015 BLACK-FOOTED FERRET SURVEY LOGAN COUNTY, KANSAS DAN MULHERN; U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Similar documents
Big Chino Valley Pumped Storage Project (FERC No ) Desert Tortoise Study Plan

Result Demonstration Report

Table1. Target lamb pre-weaning daily live weight gain from grazed pasture

2012 Quail Season Outlook By Doug Schoeling, Upland Game Biologist Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

Raptor Ecology in the Thunder Basin of Northeast Wyoming

Board Meeting Agenda Item: 7.2 Paper No: Purpose: For Information. Healthcare Associated Infection Report

An audit of the quality of antimicrobial prescribing

Texas Quail Index. Result Demonstration Report 2016

A Case Study of the Effectiveness of TNR on a Feral Cat Colony

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR A PRESENCE/ ABSENCE SURVEY FOR THE DESERT TORTOISE (Gopherus agassizii),

Introduction. Background. Reggie Horel Field Research 1st and 2nd hour June 3rd, Red Fox Telemetry

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Rabbits and hares (Lagomorpha)

UK HOUSE MARTIN SURVEY 2015

Island Fox Update 2011

Livestock Guard Dog Case Study

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Investigations of Giant Garter Snakes in The Natomas Basin: 2002 Field Season

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Flexibility in sheep systems lessons learnt from EverGraze research at Wagga/Tarcutta Michael Friend, CSU

ESRM 350 The Decline (and Fall?) of the White-tailed Jackrabbit

Figure 1: Comparison of District Monthly Rainfall

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Figure 1: Comparison of District Monthly Rainfall

Texas Quail Index. Result Demonstration Report 2016

Figure 1: Comparison of District Monthly Rainfall

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Title: Sources of Genetic Variation SOLs Bio 7.b.d. Lesson Objectives

Result Demonstration Report

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Evaluation of large-scale baiting programs more surprises from Central West Queensland

Figure 1: Comparison of District Monthly Rainfall

2015 IOWA AUGUST ROADSIDE SURVEY

Effects of prey availability and climate across a decade for a desert-dwelling, ectothermic mesopredator. R. Anderson Western Washington University

FEBRUARY 2014 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Rapid City, South Dakota Waterfowl Management Plan March 25, 2009

Pygmy Rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis)

Result Demonstration Report

Primary Activity #1. The Story of Noir, the Black-footed Ferret. Description: Procedure:

Wolf Recovery Survey New Mexico. June 2008 Research & Polling, Inc.

ROAMING DOG POPULATION COUNTING PROTOCOL

Livestock Guard Dog Case Study

Montgomery County Animal Care and Control

Chickens and Eggs. May Egg Production Down 5 Percent

BOBWHITE QUAIL HABITAT EVALUATION

A Project of Peaceful Kingdom, a 501(c)3 organization

NICK CULLEN INTERIM DIRECTOR

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Feral Animals in Australia. An environmental education and sustainability resource kit for educators

Chickens and Eggs. January Egg Production Up 9 Percent

ODFW LIVESTOCK DEPREDATION INVESTIGATION REPORTS January - March 2019

Beefy and the beast Special edition, March 2010

Spotlight on rearing:apantesis nais (Drury) (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) in Louisiana by

Public Wishing to Address the Board. Legislative Regular Agenda

Chickens and Eggs. December Egg Production Down 8 Percent

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Distribution, population dynamics, and habitat analyses of Collared Lizards

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Chickens and Eggs. June Egg Production Down Slightly

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Monthly Economic Review November 2017

Animal Care, Control and Adoption

Research Summary: Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma

DISEASE MONITORING AND EXTENSION SYSTEM FOR THE SOUTH AFRICAN DAIRY INDUSTRY

Placer SPCA open admission shelter Annual total intake = ~4000 Annual cat intake = ~2400 For 2012: Total cat intake = 2411, adoptions = 1558 Average

EU Market Situation for Poultry. Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets 23 October 2014

Result Demonstration Report

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE BROOD-REARING HABITAT MANIPULATION IN MOUNTAIN BIG SAGEBRUSH, USE OF TREATMENTS, AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY ON PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH

Beef Calving Statistics (01/07/ /06/2016)

Coyote (Canis latrans)

Chickens and Eggs. November Egg Production Up Slightly

Background. Method. population that will carry a healthy-sized gene diversity. Diversity is essential to the survival of a speaes

Lizard Surveying and Monitoring in Biodiversity Sanctuaries

Start Smart. ELA: Big Book: Animals in the Park Read-Aloud Anthology You Are Beautiful As You Are

Water Vole Translocation Project: Abberton ReservoirAbout Water Voles Population Dynamics

4-H LIVESTOCK RECORD BOOK

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3 Population Size 450. Slide 4

Zimbabwe Poultry Association

Mexican Gray Wolf Reintroduction

FALLS CREEK ALPINE RESORT DOGS POLICY

TO THE TEACHER CONTENTS

Landfill Dogs by Shannon Johnstone

Drag spring forward, with Tyson.

Mauritania. 1 May 25 October Desert Locust Information Service FAO, Rome outbreak

PROGRESS REPORT OF WOLF POPULATION MONITORING IN WISCONSIN FOR THE PERIOD April-June 2000

Primary Activity #1. The Story of Noir, the Black-footed Ferret. Description: Procedure:

Yemen. JUNE Present. Desert Locust Information Service FAO, Rome 21 Feb 2014 update

Basin Wildlife. Giant Garter Snake

APPENDICES APPENDIX 1: TERRITORIALITY AND AGE AT FIRST BREEDING FOR O.N.E KIWI Age of first breeding (years)

Loss of wildlands could increase wolf-human conflicts, PA G E 4 A conversation about red wolf recovery, PA G E 8

Extending the season for prime lamb production from grass

Old Dominion University Tick Research Update Chelsea Wright Department of Biological Sciences Old Dominion University

Livestock Guard Dog Case Study

SEASONAL CHANGES IN A POPULATION OF DESERT HARVESTMEN, TRACHYRHINUS MARMORATUS (ARACHNIDA: OPILIONES), FROM WESTERN TEXAS

Altona Mosquito Control Policy 2016

Dryland Pastoral Research at Ashley Dene

GeesePeace a model program for Communities

How do dogs make trouble for wildlife in the Andes?

Transcription:

INTRODUCTION FALL 2015 BLACK-FOOTED FERRET SURVEY LOGAN COUNTY, KANSAS DAN MULHERN; U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE As part of ongoing efforts to monitor the status of reintroduced endangered black-footed ferrets at two sites in Kansas, the Kansas Field Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service coordinated a survey of the Butte Creek Ranch (formerly identified as the Haverfield/Barnhardt/Blank ranch) and TNC s Smoky Valley Ranch in fall 2015, conducted October 13-21. A total of 8 consecutive nights of survey effort were completed, with a partial ninth night that was cut short by rain. METHODS Since ferrets were first released on the two ranches in December 2007, they have comprised what was considered a single reintroduction/recovery site. That changed during 2015 when the Haverfield and Barnhardt families entered into a Safe Harbor Agreement (SHA) for their ranch, formally calling it the Butte Creek Ranch. All activities conducted as part of ferret recovery on this property will now fall under the purview of the range-wide SHA. Details of this SHA are not included with this report but are readily available from the Fish and Wildlife Service. The two ranches have been subdivided into individual pasture units for the purposes of surveying and reporting results (Figures 1 and 2). The standard protocol is to survey each pasture unit a minimum of three nights, with some smaller units grouped together for coverage by a single survey crew during a night s work. A thorough survey requires at least 27 vehicle-nights in order to complete the Butte Creek Ranch, with another 9 vehicle-nights required to complete the Smoky Valley Ranch. Despite rainfall eliminating the last scheduled night and essentially rendering the previous night s data unusable, the fall 2015 survey was still able to incorporate 51 vehicle-nights due to the adequate vehicle availability early in the survey. This included 39 nights on Butte Creek Ranch and 12 on Smoky Valley Ranch. The survey nights were completed under optimal survey conditions, with the exception of high winds on two nights. A standard survey crew follows a protocol worked out over 20 years at other black-footed ferret reintroduction sites in North America, and consists of a high-clearance vehicle occupied by two or more surveyors, outfitted with spotlights, GPS units, communications radios, and pasture maps and data sheets. By driving randomly-spaced routes around a pasture, surveyors observe eye-shine of ferrets and other species using the spotlights. Fifty-one people participated in one or more nights of this survey, providing approximately 350 vehicle-hours of effort.

One of the purposes of the annual fall survey is to locate and count as many first-year kits as possible, which necessitates capturing animals for individual identification. For each ferret that was observed at or entering a specific burrow, a live trap was then placed on this burrow, and checked frequently during the remainder of the night. A trap is typically left unattended for no more than one hour at a time to prevent over-cooling or other danger to a trapped ferret. A GPS reading is taken at the location, and a reflector stake is left at the burrow, both to aid in relocating the site. Once a ferret is captured, it is transported immediately to a central processing site nearby. It is anesthetized, given a thorough veterinarian exam, vaccinated against canine distemper, given a passive integrated transponder (PIT) chip, if it does not already have one, and a temporary dye mark on the throat. This latter mark enables surveyors to determine whether an animal has already been trapped without having to get it in hand again. Post-processing of the data involves comparing PIT numbers read with a list of all previouslymarked ferrets, as well as trying to determine whether uncaptured animals were new individuals or repeat observations of a previously-seen ferret. For example, if two ferret observations occur less than a mile or so apart on different nights, there is a possibility they are of the same animal and only counted as a single individual, unless capture clearly identifies them as separate. RESULTS Butte Creek Ranch A total of 11 different black-footed ferrets were observed during the survey on the Butte Creek Ranch. Nine of these ferrets were captured, and the remaining two were uncaptured but determined to be unique individuals. The nine captured ferrets were identified as three adult males, one adult female, two juvenile males, and three juvenile females. The remaining two ferrets were not captured, and were determined to be separate individuals based on the timing and location of their observation. See Table 1 for information on where ferrets were observed on this site. Smoky Valley Ranch Two black-footed ferrets were observed during the survey on the Smoky Valley Ranch, and neither was captured. Therefore, we have no idea if there are any first-year kits, which would indicate successful reproduction. See Table 2 for information on where these animals were observed on the ranch.

DISCUSSION Three years of drought were broken by good rainfall in spring and early summer across the area including these two reintroduction ranches. However, as indicated by Matt Bain, Ranch Manager at Smoky Valley Ranch, the timing was such to encourage growth of purple three-awn, a grass inedible to most grazing species, including cattle and prairie dogs. So while vegetation coverage appeared improved over 2014, much of it was unsuitable habitat. Habitat on the Butte Creek Ranch was further reduced by a large growth of forbs such as sunflower and snow-on-themountain. In areas where these tall forbs were numerous we observed very little prairie dog activity. The spread of yucca appears to continue to be an issue on both ranches. In areas of good coverage of buffalograss or blue grama, prairie dogs appeared numerous and active. During the little time crew members spent on site during daylight hours, prairie dogs appeared numerous and in in good body condition in these micro-areas. As part of the Butte Creek Ranch SHA, additional prairie dog control was conducted within the boundary of the property in fall 2014-2015. The purpose of this increased control was to reduce the pressure from prairie dogs emigrating off this property onto neighboring lands where they are not well tolerated. The Service s goal was to ensure that intentional prairie dog poisoning would never bring the prairie dog area on the ranch below 6,400 acres, the baseline at which this project began. Beginning with approximately 7,800 acres in 2014, the Service and USDA targeted nearly 1,000 acres for treatment in addition to the 90-foot buffer which is always managed for zero prairie dog occupancy. While this targeted treatment was intended to reduce overall prairie dog occupancy to 6,800 acres, habitat surveys in July 2015 indicated the total is now between 6,300 and 6,400 acres. The extra reduction in about 450 acres of prairie dogs is attributed to the increase in undesirable vegetation ranch-wide. Because of the levels currently existing, there will be no additional interior prairie dog reduction actions taken on the Butte Creek Ranch this treatment season. For the third consecutive year, numbers of other mesocarnivores appear to still be very high on both ranches, although animal numbers other than ferrets are anecdotal reports. Coyotes, badgers, skunks and swift fox in particular were common and in some locations numerous. Swift fox, surprisingly, are still abundant on both ranches despite the spike in coyote numbers. Conversely, numbers of both rabbit species, cottontail and jackrabbit, appeared reduced. What this may say about the prey base on these sites, or how, if at all, it may affect ferret population growth, cannot be determined at this time. Finding only 13 ferrets across the two sites in Logan County was a sign that things have not yet recovered from the population crash that started in 2011. This is especially true when considering that 19 new ferrets were released on the Butte Creek Ranch following the 2014 survey, which should have increased that site s total to 27. The large growth of vegetation made

visual observations much more difficult, and the fact that much of this increased growth is unsuitable habitat for prairie dogs compounds the problem. The ability of either ranch to address this issue and bring about an increase in more favorable grass species will be crucial in determining future ferret population growth. See Table 3 for the cumulative numbers since project initiation. Table 1. Butte Creek Ranch, KS Black-Footed Ferret Fall 2015 Survey Results; October 13-21, 2015. Numbers indicate unique individual observed ferrets. PASTURE Adult Male Adult Female Juv Male Juv Female Unknown TOTAL Cake Bin 0 0 0 0 1 1 East 1 0 0 0 0 1 W Drive + NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 House N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blank + SW 2 1 2 3 1 9 Barnhardt 0 0 0 0 0 0 S Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3 1 2 3 2 11 Table 2. Smoky Valley Ranch, KS Black-Footed Ferret Fall 2015 Survey Results; October 13-21, 2015. Numbers indicate unique individual observed ferrets. PASTURE Adult Male Adult Female Juv Male Juv Female Unknown TOTAL East + Long 0 0 0 0 0 0 River + Horse 0 0 0 0 1 1 West + Far West 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 2 2

Table 3. Logan County, Kansas Black-footed Ferret Numbers since Reintroduction Began Date Event Adult Male Adult Female Juv Male Juv Female Unknown CUMULATIVE MINIMUM TOTAL Dec 2007 Release 0 5 10 9 0 24 Mar 2008 Spotlight 3 5 0 0 0 8 Aug 2008 Spotlight 2 4 1 0 9 16 Oct 2008 Release 0 0 18 19 0 53 Nov 2008 Release 0 1 6 6 0 66 Mar 2009 Spotlight 6 7 0 0 6 19 Aug 2009 Spotlight 2 8 1 1 14 26 Dec 2009 Snowtrack?? 0 0 20 20 Mar 2010 Spotlight 13 19 0 0 4 36 Sep 2010 Release 3 4 4 3 0 14 Sep 2010 Spotlight 7 9 15 17 16 78 Nov 2010 Release 0 3 11 11 0 103 Jan 2011 Spotlight 0 0 0 0 3 106 Mar 2011 Spotlight 17 15 0 0 11 43 Aug-Sep 2011 Spotlight 9 7 2 3 17 38 Mar 2012 Spotlight 5 3 0 0 14 22 Jul-Aug 2012 Spotlight? 4?? 18 (13 juv) 22 Sep-Oct 2012 Spotlight 7 9 6 8 9 39 Oct 2012 Release 0 2 6 4 0 51 Mar-Apr 2013 Spotlight 3 3 0 0 5 11 Aug 2013 Spotlight 0 0 0 0 5 5 Oct 2013 Spotlight 4 0 2 4 12 22 Mar 2014 Spotlight 2 3 0 0 1 6 Oct 2014 Spotlight 2 2 2 2 3 11 Oct 2014 Release 6 4 6 3 0 30 Oct 2015 Spotlight 3 1 2 3 4 13 *Minimum total of 269 BFF released & born between Dec '07 and Oct. 2015-13 SURVIVORS* SURVIVING

Figure 1. Pasture map of the Butte Creek Ranch. All units are managed for prairie dogs and ferrets and are available during surveys.

Figure 2. Pasture map of TNC s Smoky Valley Ranch. Only the central pastures (named in Table 1) are managed for prairie dogs and ferrets and are included in surveys.