Ultrasound affects minimal inhibitory concentration of ampicillin against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300

Similar documents
Tel: Fax:

Antibiotics in vitro : Which properties do we need to consider for optimizing our therapeutic choice?

Q1. (a) Clostridium difficile is a bacterium that is present in the gut of up to 3% of healthy adults and 66% of healthy infants.

Dynamic Drug Combination Response on Pathogenic Mutations of Staphylococcus aureus

ETX2514SUL (sulbactam/etx2514) for the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

Synergism of penicillin or ampicillin combined with sissomicin or netilmicin against enterococci

Antibacterial activity of Stephania suberosa extract against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

JAC Bactericidal index: a new way to assess quinolone bactericidal activity in vitro

Antibacterials. Recent data on linezolid and daptomycin

Principles of Antimicrobial therapy

SURVIVABILITY OF HIGH RISK, MULTIRESISTANT BACTERIA ON COTTON TREATED WITH COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

Inhibiting Microbial Growth in vivo. CLS 212: Medical Microbiology Zeina Alkudmani

Selective toxicity. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/17/2016

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

An Approach to Linezolid and Vancomycin against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

MICHAEL J. RYBAK,* ELLIE HERSHBERGER, TABITHA MOLDOVAN, AND RICHARD G. GRUCZ

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

The pharmacological and microbiological basis of PK/PD : why did we need to invent PK/PD in the first place? Paul M. Tulkens

Principles of Antimicrobial Therapy

Introduction to Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

New Antibiotics for MRSA

Occurrence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin in Srinagarind Hospital

Other β-lactamase Inhibitor (BLI) Combinations: Focus on VNRX-5133, WCK 5222 and ETX2514SUL

Background and Plan of Analysis

Isolation of antibiotic producing Actinomycetes from soil of Kathmandu valley and assessment of their antimicrobial activities

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

Consequences of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria. Antimicrobial Resistance. Molecular Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance. Topics to be Covered

Visit ABLE on the Web at:

MID 23. Antimicrobial Resistance. Consequences of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria. Molecular Genetics of Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial Resistance Acquisition of Foreign DNA

مادة االدوية المرحلة الثالثة م. غدير حاتم محمد

Principles of Anti-Microbial Therapy Assistant Professor Naza M. Ali. Lec 1

Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance on Human Health. Robert Cunney HSE HCAI/AMR Programme and Temple Street Children s University Hospital

against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria

RESISTANCE OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS TO VANCOMYCIN IN ZARQA, JORDAN

OPTIMIZATION OF PK/PD OF ANTIBIOTICS FOR RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS

MRSA surveillance 2014: Poultry

VLLM0421c Medical Microbiology I, practical sessions. Protocol to topic J05

Original Article. Hossein Khalili a*, Rasool Soltani b, Sorrosh Negahban c, Alireza Abdollahi d and Keirollah Gholami e.

Antibiotics: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Slides made by Special consultant Henrik Hasman Statens Serum Institut

A THREE DIMENSIONAL REVIEW ON HUMAN IGNORANCE REGARDING ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE

Antibiotics. Antimicrobial Drugs. Alexander Fleming 10/18/2017

Original Article. Suwanna Trakulsomboon, Ph.D., Visanu Thamlikitkul, M.D.

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Advance Access published August 26, 2006

Defining Resistance and Susceptibility: What S, I, and R Mean to You

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Why Don t These Drugs Work Anymore? Biosciences in the 21 st Century Dr. Amber Rice October 28, 2013

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Detection of Methicillin Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Using Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

Antibiotics & Resistance

The Disinfecting Effect of Electrolyzed Water Produced by GEN-X-3. Laboratory of Diagnostic Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University

Pharmacological Evaluation of Amikacin in Neonates

UDC: : :579.22/ :615.28

Testing for antimicrobial activity against multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. For. Forbo Flooring B.V. Final Report. Work Carried Out By

Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in Ghana

Mili Rani Saha and Sanya Tahmina Jhora. Department of Microbiology, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Mitford, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Annual Surveillance Summary: Methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections in the Military Health System (MHS), 2017

No-leaching. No-resistance. No-toxicity. >99.999% Introducing BIOGUARD. Best-in-class dressings for your infection control program

Marc Decramer 3. Respiratory Division, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Key words: Campylobacter, diarrhea, MIC, drug resistance, erythromycin

STAPHYLOCOCCI: KEY AST CHALLENGES

Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital

Title: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) Mediated Modulation of Bacterial Antibiotic

What Is Thought To Be The Problem?

Randall Singer, DVM, MPVM, PhD

In vitro Activity Evaluation of Telavancin against a Contemporary Worldwide Collection of Staphylococcus. aureus. Rodrigo E. Mendes, Ph.D.

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Recommended for Implementation at Step 7 of the VICH Process on 15 December 2004 by the VICH Steering Committee

EXCEDE Sterile Suspension

Assessment of ultrasound irradiation on inactivation of gram negative and positive bacteria isolated from hospital in aqueous solution

Burn Infection & Laboratory Diagnosis

Cefazolin vs. Antistaphyloccal Penicillins: The Great Debate

In vitro effect of some Indian honeys on Staphylococcus aureus from wounds

Typhoid fever - priorities for research and development of new treatments

Dual Antibiotic Delivery from Chitosan Sponges Prevents In Vivo Polymicrobial Biofilm Infections

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

Antimicrobials & Resistance

Antimicrobial Selection to Combat Resistance

DETERMINANTS OF TARGET NON- ATTAINMENT IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS RECEIVING β-lactams

Brief Report THE DEVELOPMENT OF VANCOMYCIN RESISTANCE IN A PATIENT WITH METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS INFECTION

ETX0282, a Novel Oral Agent Against Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

LINEE GUIDA: VALORI E LIMITI

ANTIMICROBIAL TESTING. with ALKA VITA (ALKAHYDROXY ) ESCHERICHIA COLI STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS (MRSA) PSEUDOMONA AERUGINOSA ENTEROBACTER CLOACAE

SESSION XVI NEW ANTIBIOTICS

ETX2514: Responding to the global threat of nosocomial multidrug and extremely drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens

Annual Surveillance Summary: Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections in the Military Health System (MHS), 2016

SELECT NEWS. Florfenicol Monograph: Injectable Therapy for Cattle

Antimicrobial Resistance

Challenges Emerging resistance Fewer new drugs MRSA and other resistant pathogens are major problems

International Journal of Advances in Pharmacy and Biotechnology Vol.3, Issue-2, 2017, 1-7 Research Article Open Access.

Comparison of Clindamycin, Erythromycin, and Methicillin in Streptococcal Infections in Monkeys

Antibiotics in the future tense: The Application of Antibiotic Stewardship in Veterinary Medicine. Mike Apley Kansas State University

Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: How Do We Define them? How do We Stop Them?

Annual Report: Table 1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Results for 2,488 Isolates of S. pneumoniae Collected Nationally, 2005 MIC (µg/ml)

Transcription:

Short communication Ultrasound affects minimal inhibitory concentration of ampicillin against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 Laura Selan a, Rosanna Papa a, Gaetano Barbato b, Gian Luca Scoarughi b, Gianluca Vrenna a, Marco Artini a* a Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy b Promedica Bioelectronics s.r.l., Rome, Italy Running Title: Ultrasound effect on MRSA susceptibility to ampicillin SUMMARY Antimicrobial resistance is one of the most serious global public health problems. Therefore, novel strategies are needed to counteract bacterial resistance development. The aim of the present study was to enhance the activity of antibiotics to bacteria by using ultrasound. Ultrasound reduced the dosage of ampicillin required to impair bacterial viability. Key words: MRSA; ultrasound; ampicillin; antimicrobial; sonowell * Corresponding author: Marco Artini Sapienza University, Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy. Tel.: +39 0649694261; fax: +39 0649694298.e-mail address: marco.artini@uniroma1.it

The widespread use of antibiotics has resulted in a growing problem of antimicrobial resistance in community and hospital settings (Mai et al., 2017). Antimicrobial classes for which resistance has become a worrisome problem include β-lactams, glycopeptides, and fluoroquinolones (Rice, 2012). Therefore, novel antimicrobial drugs are needed to counteract bacterial resistance development (Klahn et al., 2017). However, the increasing outbreak of various multidrug-resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus aureus strains has resulted in treatment difficulties, which imposes a burden on health-care systems and intensities the need for new antimicrobial agents (Dudhagara et al., 2014). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) causes numerous infections ranging from mild cellulitis to life-threatening sepsis. (Stryjewski et al., 2014; Mlynek et al., 2016). Furthermore S. aureus can invade eukaryotic cells and so evade antimicrobial therapy (Artini et al., 2011; Papa et al., 2013; Selan et al., 2017). Although many MRSA infections are health-care associated, the increasing incidence of communityacquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections represents a growing public health concern (Otto, 2013). CA-MRSA USA300 is responsible for many kinds of infections of skin and soft-tissue. Previous experiments reported in literature have shown a synergistic effect between ultrasound and antibiotics in killing bacteria belonging to Gram positive and Gram negative (Rediske et al., 35 1998; Carmen et al., 2004). A recent review addresses that the effect of ultrasound on reduction of MIC depends both on bacterial species and on antibiotic class (Cai Y et al., 2017) rather than Gram positive and negative distinction. In the present work we used a novel instrument (SonoWell, Promedica Bioelectronics srl, Italy) designed specifically to work on cell cultures grown in plates. The instrument is equipped with 4 flat ultrasound transducers operating respectively at 0.65, 1.0, 2.4 and 4.5 MHz driven by 4 parallel channels each able to generate and amplify its respective ultrasound frequency. Suitable protocols varying the spatial peak temporal average intensity (ISPTA) from 0.2 mw/cm 2 up to 12 W/cm 2 for each channel were devised to deliver similar acoustic pressures at the different operating frequencies. Peak pressures (in kpa) delivered vs ISPTA within the well were measured with hydrophones (Precision Acoustics, UK) to establish reference calibration curves. The instrument described in this manuscript represents a novel apparatus where the frequencies, the acoustic pressure and the time of exposure are completely different from data reported in literature. To assess the influence of ultrasound on the bacterial tolerance to antibiotics, we adopted a condition of sonication that doesn't influence bacterial viability. A residual vitality of at least 90% of bacterial cells was the criterion adopted to find the cut-off value for maximal sonication intensity. The bacterial strain used was MRSA USA300 (Papa et al., 2013; Kaïret et al., 2017). Overnight bacterial culture of USA 300 grown in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth at 37 C under vigorous

agitation (180 rpm) was diluted 1:100 in 24-wells and subsequently treated. The sonication conditions are shown in Table 1. Sonications were performed with all four transducers, each one was used at three different acoustic intensities (ISPTA), resulting in three different acoustic pressures (Table 1). Each well was sonicated for 180 seconds with an ON/OFF time of 15/5 ms, Duty Cycle 75%. Furthermore, the cavitation effect for the experimental conditions here adopted is neglectable. Figure 1 shows the spatial distribution in the multi-well plate of the experimental conditions described above. To avoid interference between adjacent wells, the non-sonicated controls (NT) were centrally placed (Figure 1). Each well was inoculated with a bacterial suspension of 10 5 in a total volume of 1 ml. The plate was kept at 37 C throughout the experimental phase. After sonication the content of each well was recovered and appropriate dilutions were seeded on an agar plate. After overnight incubation at 37 C, the plates were retrieved and the colony forming units (CFUs) were measured. The results obtained demonstrated that there are no interference effects between adjacent wells. The adopted experimental conditions were compatible with bacterial viability. However, in the extreme condition (acoustic pressure 500 kpa - 4.5 MHz transducer) a not statistically significant 1-log reduction of bacterial load was observed. On the basis of the results obtained in preliminary experiments, we used 4.5 MHz transducer at acoustic pressure of 250 kpa. Only this transducer induced a reduction of bacterial viability after acoustic pressure increase from 250 to 500 kpa. Then the defined sonication conditions were tested on the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ampicillin on MRSA USA 300. Ampicillin has been chosen for different reasons: i) MRSA USA300 is normally resistant to it: ii) it irreversibly impairs the cell wall synthesis; iii) it is a broad-spectrum antibiotic. Logarithmic-phase culture of S. aureus USA300 was added to each well to achieve 10 6 CFU/tube. The multiwell was incubated at 37 C for 18 h. After incubation the MIC was recorded as the lowest concentration of antibiotic that completely inhibits visible growth of the organism (according to NCCLS). Ampicillin MIC value for MRSA USA 300 is 10 mg/ml. The experiment was carried out using scalar dilutions of ampicillin starting from 10 mg/ml. Wells were sonicated as described above. To amplify the sonication effect, the treatment was repeated three times on the same well at intervals of 15 minutes. Immediately, after sonication, the content of each well was recovered and appropriate dilutions were seeded on agar plate. After overnight incubation at 37 C, CFU counts on the plates were measured.

Each data point was obtained from six independent experiments, each performed at least as quadruplicates. Results obtained showed a reduction of MIC value from 10 mg/ml to 5 mg/ml in three out of six performed experiments. In order to improve the activity of ampicillin on the cells after sonication, we used the 4.5 MHz transducer with an acoustic pressure of 500 kpa. Six independent experiments were performed in quadruplicates also in this case. Data obtained showed a reduction of MIC value in six experiments out of six, and specifically to 2.5 mg/ml (four experiments) and to 5 mg/ml (two experiments), respectively. The differences obtained in MIC values for 4,5 MHz transducer at the various power levels are statistically significant (p value < 0,05). Results are summarized in Figure 2. Results obtained demonstrated that US is able to reduce the effective dosage of ampicillin to impair the bacterial viability. This effect is correlated to the frequencies of US used, though in this field of application, further studies are needed. Furthermore, it is important to underline that the intensity of ultrasounds used in these experiments are absolutely safe for human tissue. The British Medical Ultrasound Society published the guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound equipment. Ultrasound is considered safe up to a mechanical index (MI) value < 0,7. In our equipment, using the 4,5 MHz transducer at 500 kpa, the MI is 0,23, notably lower than the MI reported in the guidelines. In order to obtain an effective improvement of the bacterial response to antibiotic is important to find a right combination between acoustic pressure and frequency because a high power does not necessarily correspond to a better microbiological effect. Application of ultrasound in combination with antibiotic therapy could therefore lead to better treatment of bacterial infections. Acknowledgments This work was supported by grant of Ministero dell Istruzione dell Università e della Ricerca: PON Ricerca e Competitività 2007 2013, D.D. Prot. 1/Ric 18/01/2010 (Progetto PON01_01059: Development of a new technological platform based on focused ultrasounds for non invasive treatment of tumors and infections). Competing interests The authors have no competing interests to declare.

References Artini M., Scoarughi G.L., Papa R., Cellini A., Carpentieri A., et al. (2011). A new anti-infective strategy to reduce adhesion-mediated virulence in Staphylococcus aureus affecting surface proteins. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 24, 661-72. Cai Y, Wang J, Liu X, Wang R, Xia L. (2017). A review of the combination therapy of low frequency ultrasound with antibiotics. Biomed Res Int. 2017, 2317846 Carmen J.C., Roeder B.L., Nelson J.L., Beckstead B.L., Runyan C.M., et al. (2004). Ultrasonically enhanced vancomycin activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms in vivo. J Biomater Appl. 18, 237-245. Dudhagara P.R., Ghelani A.D., Patel R.K. (2014). Phenotypic characterization and antibiotics combination approach to control the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from the hospital derived fomites. Asian J Med Sci. 2, 72 78. Kaïret K., Ho E., Van Kerkhoven D., Boes J., Van Calenbergh S., et al. (2017). USA300, A strain of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, crossing Belgium's borders: outbreak of skin and soft tissue infections in a hospital in Belgium. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 36, 905-909. Klahn P., Brönstrup M. (2017). Bifunctional antimicrobial conjugates and hybrid antimicrobials. Nat Prod Rep. 34, 832 885. Mai B., Gao Y., Li M., Wang X., Zhang K., et al. (2017). Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy for Staphylococcus aureus and multidrug-resistant bacterial burn infection in vitro and in vivo. Int J Nanomedicine. 12, 5915-5931. Mlynek K.D., Callahan M.T., Shimkevitch A.V., Farmer J.T., Endres J.L., et al. (2016). Effects of low-dose amoxicillin on Staphylococcus aureus USA300 biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 60, 2639-2651. Otto M. (2013). Community-associated MRSA: what makes them special? Int J Med Microbiol. 303, 324-330. Papa R., Artini M., Cellini A., Tilotta M., Galano E., et al. (2013). A new anti-infective strategy to reduce the spreading of antibiotic resistance by the action on adhesion-mediated virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus. Microb Pathog. 63, 44-53. Rediske A.M., Hymas W.C., Wilkinson R., Pitt W.G. (1998). Ultrasonic enhancement of antibiotic action on several species of bacteria. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 44, 283-288. Rice L.B. (2012). Mechanisms of resistance and clinical relevance of resistance to β-lactams, glycopeptides, and fluoroquinolones. Mayo Clinic Proc. 87, 198 208.

Selan L., Papa R., Ermocida A., Cellini A., Ettorre E., et al. (2017). Serratiopeptidase reduces the invasion of osteoblasts by Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 30, 423-428. Shi S.F., Zhang X.L., Zhu C., Chen D.S., Guo Y.Y. (2013). Ultrasonically enhanced rifampin activity against internalized Staphylococcus aureus. Exp Ther Med. 5, 257-262. Stryjewski M.E., Corey G.R. (2014). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an evolving pathogen. Clin Infect Dis. 58 Suppl 1, S10-19.

Table 1: Summary of sonication conditions. Transducer Acoustic Pressure Peak (kpa) Acoustic Intensity ISPTA (W/cm 2 ) WELL- TIME (sec) DUTY CYCLE DEAD TIME (sec) 0,65 MHz 30 0.29 180 75% 10 0,65 MHz 500 4.66 180 75% 20 0,65 MHz 1000 9.10 180 75% 120 1 MHz 30 0.29 180 75% 10 1 MHz 500 4.77 180 75% 20 1 MHz 1000 9.10 180 75% 120 2,4 MHz 30 0.25 180 75% 10 2,4 MHz 500 4.24 180 75% 20 2,4 MHz 1000 8.84 180 75% 120 4,5 MHz 30 0.29 180 75% 10 4,5 MHz 250 2.41 180 75% 20 4,5 MHz 500 5.20 180 75% 120

Figure 1 Spatial distribution of the different experimental conditions in the 24-well plate. Each well was seeded with 1mL of bacterial culture (10 5 /ml). NT indicates not sonicated controls.

Figure 2 Effect of ultrasounds on ampicillin MIC of MRSA S. aureus USA300. Bars correspond to weighted averages, error bars represent standard deviations.