ADC 2016 Report on Bacterial Resistance in Cultures from SEHOS and General Practitioners in Curaçao

Similar documents
Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

1. The preferred treatment option for an initial UTI episode in a 22-year-old female patient

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

A retrospective analysis of urine culture results issued by the microbiology department, Teaching Hospital, Karapitiya

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

Bacterial Pathogens in Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern from a Teaching Hospital, Bengaluru, India

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

MICRONAUT MICRONAUT-S Detection of Resistance Mechanisms. Innovation with Integrity BMD MIC

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

BACTERIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY REPORT: 2016 (January 2016 December 2016)

Chemotherapy of bacterial infections. Part II. Mechanisms of Resistance. evolution of antimicrobial resistance

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Summary of the latest data on antibiotic resistance in the European Union

Antibacterial Resistance In Wales

C&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 2013 December 2015

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

2015 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE SURVEILLANCE FROM SENTINEL PUBLIC HOSPITALS, SOUTH AFRICA, 2014

Recommendations for Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Restrictive Interventions in Acute Hospitals in Ireland

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in the Province of British Columbia

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

Leveraging the Lab and Microbiology Department to Optimize Stewardship

National Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance

Interactive session: adapting to antibiogram. Thong Phe Heng Vengchhun Felix Leclerc Erika Vlieghe

EARS Net Report, Quarter

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

INCIDENCE OF BACTERIAL COLONISATION IN HOSPITALISED PATIENTS WITH DRUG-RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS

Original Articles. K A M S W Gunarathne 1, M Akbar 2, K Karunarathne 3, JRS de Silva 4. Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health, 2011; 40(4):

5/4/2018. Multidrug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) Objectives. Outline. Define a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO)

Detection of ESBL Producing Gram Negative Uropathogens and their Antibiotic Resistance Pattern from a Tertiary Care Centre, Bengaluru, India

Presenter: Ombeva Malande. Red Cross Children's Hospital Paed ID /University of Cape Town Friday 6 November 2015: Session:- Paediatric ID Update

EUCAST Subcommitee for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms (ESDReM)

Mechanism of antibiotic resistance

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory

Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance from sentinel public hospitals, South Africa, 2013

Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in the Province of British Columbia. August Epidemiology Services British Columbia Centre for Disease Control

Protocol for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Urinary Isolates in Scotland

Antimicrobial Cycling. Donald E Low University of Toronto

Do clinical microbiology laboratory data distort the picture of antibiotic resistance in humans and domestic animals?

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

Imagine. Multi-Drug Resistant Superbugs- What s the Big Deal? A World. Without Antibiotics. Where Simple Infections can be Life Threatening

How is Ireland performing on antibiotic prescribing?

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

Antibiotic Updates: Part II

Table 2.01 Overview of Surveillance programs in the Netherlands. available since. GP, laboratories Decentral Hospital,

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) CHRISTUS SETX

Using Web-Based Instruction Modules to Improve Practitioner Knowledge at Yale New Haven Hospital on the Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance and

Antimicrobial Update. Alison MacDonald Area Antimicrobial Pharmacist NHS Highland April 2018

CUMULATIVE ANTIBIOGRAM

The β- Lactam Antibiotics. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The University of Jordan November 2018

Performance Information. Vet use only

Dr. Shaiful Azam Sazzad. MD Student (Thesis Part) Critical Care Medicine Dhaka Medical College

QUICK REFERENCE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.)

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

Antimicrobial Stewardship/Statewide Antibiogram. Felicia Matthews Senior Consultant, Pharmacy Specialty BD MedMined Services

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

Cipro for gram positive cocci in urine

New Opportunities for Microbiology Labs to Add Value to Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

DR. MICHAEL A. BORG DIRECTOR OF INFECTION PREVENTION & CONTROL MATER DEI HOSPITAL - MALTA

Michael Hombach*, Guido V. Bloemberg and Erik C. Böttger

Approach to pediatric Antibiotics

Einheit für pädiatrische Infektiologie Antibiotics - what, why, when and how?

Other Beta - lactam Antibiotics

21 st Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines Peer Review Report Antibiotics Review

Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial and Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in the Department of the Navy: Annual Report 2013

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

The UK 5-year AMR Strategy - a brief overview - Dr Berit Muller-Pebody National Infection Service Public Health England

Prevalence of Extended Spectrum Beta- Lactamase Producers among Various Clinical Samples in a Tertiary Care Hospital: Kurnool District, India

Recommendations on Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Ireland

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

Transcription:

ADC 216 Report on Bacterial Resistance in Cultures from SEHOS and General Practitioners in Curaçao Willemstad, November 217

Authors: Radjin Steingrover clinical microbiologist, head dpt. Microbiology ADC NV Elske Sieswerda clinical microbiology, resident epidemiologist VUMC Liane Virginia-Cova interim director ADC NV 1

Table of Contents ADC 216 Report on Bacterial Resistance in Cultures from SEHOS and General Practitioners in Curaçao... 1. Executive Summary... 3 2. Introduction... 4 3. Methods... 5 4. Results... 6 4.1. Isolates from blood cultures... 6 4.2. Results from urine cultures (clinic)... 15 4.3. Results from urine cultures (general practice)... 2 4. Discussion... 25 2

1. Executive Summary The department of Microbiology at ADC periodically reports on antibiotic resistance in the bacteria that are isolated from cultures received from the Sint Elisabeth Hospital (SEHOS) and from general practitioners. Analyzed and reported in a format that is similar to formats like WHONET, EARSS and NethMap, these data provide insight in the current state of antibiotic resistance in Curaçao. The data is primarily geared towards decision-making in the medical field: professionals who need to choose optimal empirical antibiotics for patients with life-threatening infections in the hospital as well as the general practitioner needing to know how effective empirical antibiotics for urinary tract infections are going to be. For policymakers at various levels, the data can be used to assess the efficacy of interventions in antimicrobial stewardship activities, assess the need for new antibiotics and compare the situation of Curaçao to other countries. Looking at the data in the 216 report, gram-positive bacteria, most notably MRSA, and gram-negative resistance are a reason for concern. The presence of MRSA in bloodcultures is indicative of a far larger reservoir of MRSA in patients. The prevalence of MRSA in patients has to be high in order to result in actual cases of MRSA sepsis. The data in this report suggest that efforts to counter MRSA in SEHOS indeed reduce the numbers of sepsis caused by MRSA. Gram-negative bacteria can become resistant to all antibiotics in the medical arsenal. The gram-negatives reported here indeed illustrate that ability. Carbapenems represent a last-resort antibiotic and resistance to carbapenem antibiotics should be a priority in any effort to counter antibiotic resistance. Clindamycin and ciprofloxacin data as well as 3 rd generation cephalosporins are all represented in this report. All have their own resistance rates and dynamics in time, when looking at the years under observation. It is currently not possible to expect efficacy from these antibiotics when, used empirically, due to the rates of resistance present. If resistance can be reduced effectively, these antibiotics may become a reliable empirical choice once again. It must be encouraging to all participants in the field of medicine that many trends indeed show improvement over the years reported here. It is a compliment to all who take care when prescribing antibiotics by doing this with caution and by adhering to guidance. It shows that all the effort to monitor and counter the spread of resistant bacteria is effective and indeed can reverse the trend of ever increasing resistance to antibiotics. If Curaçao keeps up its efforts to counter the threats of antibiotic resistance, physicians can keep on prescribing cheap and trusted antibiotics with good effects and avoid the dreadful post-antibiotic era where healthcare outcomes are severely impacted negatively by the evolving antibiotic resistance in our bacteria. 3

2. Introduction This is ADC s 216 annual report on bacterial resistance in Curaçao. It shows the presence of resistance to the most common antibiotics used in the local medical field. The report is meant to serve clinicians and policy-makers with periodical reports on bacterial resistance. Just like in the previous analysis, results from repeated testing were filtered out to avoid bias. Filtering for repeated cultures was done equal to WHONET or NethMap methods. Only the first species per material per person per year is included. This method delivers figures that are very suitable to base empirical therapies upon, in and outside the hospital. It does however underestimate the total burden of antibiotic resistance encountered in the clinic. Patients with infections that are more difficult to treat, are likely to visit their doctor more often and get cultured more frequently. Bacteria can acquire more resistance over the course of time, yet any isolates that were cultured later in time, are excluded from the analysis. The data reported here provides a basic understanding of antibacterial resistance rates that allows clinicians to choose the empirical therapies that they need to treat their patients safely. Also, with this data, local guidelines for antibiotic therapies can be optimized periodically. The year-to-year changes are visualized and can provide feedback for antimicrobial stewardship activities. 4

3. Methods Cultures with a positive result from January 1 st, 21 up to December 31 st, 215 were extracted from the laboratory information system at ADC. The cultures were categorized based on the requesting entity (either SEHOS or general practice), using the Instellingfield in the database, selecting 'HA' or 'KLIN'. This approach does omit cultures from sources like specialist outpatients or long stay facilities which could be relevant populations. Bias from repeated testing was avoided by applying filtering according to the NethMap methodology. This means that only the first bacterial species per material, per patient, per year is entered. Repeatedly cultured organisms from persistent or recurrent infections in the same year are thus effectively filtered to show only the first E. coli K. pneumoniae, etc. of the year in a single patient. Susceptibility was tested on the automated VITEK II system with S/I/R interpretations based on yearly updated Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria. Most amoxicillin susceptibility tests are based on ampicillin as an indicator antibiotic according to CLSI guidelines. Flucloxacillin susceptibility in staphylococci is determined by cefoxitin testing, the most sensitive marker for the detection of PBP2a phenotypes like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Piperacillin has shown erratic patterns of susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa for which no explanation was found after an investigation that was done together with the manufacturer. It was decided not to report any piperacillin results in the analysis. Previous experience indicated a clinically relevant role for the AmpC-positive Enterobacteriaceae (type-ii Enterobacteriaceae). These bacteria carry a chromosomal resistance gene that makes them resistant to penicillins and 2 nd and 3 rd generation cephalosporins. The inducible nature of this chromosome makes susceptibility testing unreliable for these betalactam antibiotics. The most important representative species of this class of bacteria appears to be Enterobacter cloacae. Apart from its AmpC-related resistance, it can carry all the genes for resistance to other classes of antibiotics too. It is associated with carbapenem resistance in part due to carbapenemases other than the typical KPC or NDM-1 carbapenemases. In the 215 analysis, E. cloacae isolates from blood cultures were added to the graphical reports because of these concerns. 5

4. Results 4.1. Isolates from blood cultures Blood cultures are an important marker for severe infection since they are the consequence of infections that cause a large enough bacteremia to be detected by the blood culture system. Usually these infections are sepsis and septic shock or endovascular infections like endocarditis. Over one third of blood cultures showed skin flora like coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) or diphtheroid rods, making the CNS the numerically largest group of bacteria in blood cultures (data not shown). These nonpathogens are only relevant in specific clinical entities like central venous catheterrelated blood stream infections and are not part of this report. The most relevant grampositive pathogens in clinical and numerical ways, that are included in this analysis, are Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. For the gram-negatives, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are included. 212 213 214 215 216 S. aureus 62 58 48 52 63 E. faecalis 21 23 28 21 14 E. coli 81 97 75 93 18 K. pneumoniae 52 65 61 64 62 E. cloacae 2 22 21 21 29 P. mirabilis 17 17 19 17 13 P. aeruginosa 23 14 2 34 32 6

4.1.1. Results from blood cultures, gram-positives Representative gram-positive bacteria from bloodcultures are Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. All E. faecalis are vancomycin susceptible and over 9% is susceptible to amoxicillin, a pattern that was stable over the observed timeframe. S. aureus showed resistance to some degree to all antibiotics reported. Before 215 no data was available for gentamicin, nor for tetracycline, the marker antibiotic for doxycycline. The 215 and 216 data show a small percentage resistant to cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole). Vancomycin resistance in 215 was due to VISA/GISA-like isolates and not due to VRSA. Vancomycin resistance disappeared again in 216. The most important trend up to 215 was the increasing presence of MRSA, indicated by the percentage of flucloxacillin resistant isolates. In blood cultures, the percentage rose during the previous five years from to 9% in 214. This very alarming trend appeared to regress in 215 and is still improving in 216 compared to 214. Efforts to counter MRSA in SEHOS were actively continued in 215 and 216. For macrolides and lincosamides like erythromycin and clindamycin, there is substantial resistance in 216 around 15%. For empirical coverage of S. aureus, resistance to clindamycin should be taken into consideration. Severe infections which require empirical S. aureus coverage should be commenced with intravenous flucloxacillin and vancomycin, optionally combined with gentamicin. Empirical therapy for milder S. aureus infections should preferably include agents like cotrimoxazole and doxycycline. Empirical coverage of Enterococcus faecalis species is effectively achieved in most cases with amoxicillin and ultimately with vancomycin. 7

Amoxicillin Vancomycin Flucloxacillin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Erythromycin Clindamycin Tetracycline Vancomycin Staphylococcus aureus - blood - adults 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Enterococcus faecalis - blood - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 8

Amoxicillinclavulanic acid Cefuroxime Cefotaxime Nitrofurantoin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Norfloxacin Ciprofloxacin Tobramycin Meropenem 4.1.2. Results from blood cultures, E. coli Gram-negative bacteria from blood cultures are represented in this report by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Overall, 216 showed more resistance than 215 in E. coli isolates. Resistance to 3 rd generation cephalosporins like cefotaxime, indicative of the presence of ESBL enzymes, was over 15% and resistance to fluoroquinolones like ciprofloxacin was highly prevalent with 3% being resistant to ciprofloxacin. No carbapenem resistance was detected in 216. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Escherichia coli - blood - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 9

Amoxicillinclavulanic acid Cefuroxime Cefotaxime Nitrofurantoin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Norfloxacin Ciprofloxacin Tobramycin Meropenem 4.1.3. Results from blood cultures, K. pneumoniae Overall, K. pneumoniae is more resistant than E. coli. Up to 25% is resistant to 3 rd generation cephalosporins, indicative of ESBL. Susceptibility to fluoroquinolones was between 7% and 8% for norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Meropenem susceptibility was reduced in the years of the KPC carbapenemase outbreak, 212 and 213. 216 shows a 1% susceptibility to meropenem indicating a reduction of carbapenemases present in sepsis patients. The continued efforts to reduce meropenem use and isolate patients with carbapenem-resistant bacteria, are likely to contribute to the observed reduction of carbapenem resistant isolates in blood cultures. K. pneumoniae is intrinsically resistant to amoxicillin which is not included in this report. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae - blood - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 1

Nitrofurantoin Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Norfloxacine Ciprofloxacine Tobramycin Meropenem 4.1.4. Results from blood cultures, E. cloacae Enterobacter species are intrinsically resistant to penicillins and cephalosporins due to the presence of a chromosomal betalactamase, called AmpC. Enterobacteriaceae species with chromosomal AmpC grouped together are referred to as 'type II Enterobacteriaceae'. This group of bacteria shares the inducible AmpC phenotype susceptibility pattern, leaving fewer options for antibiotic therapy. High-risk wards like ICU and NICU commonly experience a high colonization pressure from type II Enterobacteriaceae due to the frequent use of penicillin-inhibitor combinations (like amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) and cephalosporins. The presence of AmpC or ESBL readily warrants the use of carbapenems for antibiotic therapy. Susceptibility of E. cloacae to meropenem was notably reduced in 215 but not in 216. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Enterobacter cloacae - blood - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 11

Amoxicillinclavulanic acid Cefuroxime Cefotaxime Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Norfloxacine Ciprofloxacine Tobramycin Meropenem 4.1.5. Results from blood cultures, P. mirabilis Clinical isolates of P. mirabilis, showed less overall resistance than any of the other enterobacteriaceae. Quinolone resistance was absent in 216 isolates. Meropenem resistance was detected and confirmed in some isolates (but not all) in 215 and 216. The application of additional meropenem MIC testing is of additional value to distinguish with certainty between true carbapenemase producers and false high meropenem MIC s reported by the VITEK II expert system. Proteus are intrinsically resistant to nitrofurantoin, which is not included in the graph. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Proteus mirabilis 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 12

Ceftazidime Meropenem Ciprofloxacine Tobramycin 4.1.6. Results from blood cultures, P. aeruginosa Isolates of P. aeruginosa showed high rates of susceptibility to all antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity in 215 and 216. For ceftazidime and gentamicin, susceptibility clearly improved when compared to the years 21 and 211. For both ceftazidime and meropenem, less than 9% of isolates were susceptible. The aminoglycosides showed over 95% susceptibility, as did the only oral agent for pseudomonas: ciprofloxacin. Piperacillin susceptibility was omitted from the report due to irrational results. Piperacillin is easily replaced by ceftazidime for pseudomonal coverage in clinical practice. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa - blood - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 13

Augmentin + Augmentin + Amikacin Cefuroxime + Cefuroxime + Amikacin Cefotaxime + Cefotaxime + Amikacin 4.1.7. Combined Efficacy of Betalactam plus Aminoglycoside Antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae Species Sepsis treatment is nearly always started empirically without having culture results to guide therapy. Gram-negative sepsis may require the combined use of a betalactam antibiotic with an aminoglycoside. For the combined susceptibility, the Enterobacteriaceae species were selected from the dataset using the same filtering for repeated cultures as previously described. Genera included are Escherichia, Klebsiella, Citrobacter, Salmonella, Raoultella, Proteus, Serratia, Morganella, and Providencia. Isolates were regarded susceptible when either one drug in the combinations was tested as susceptible. If both drugs resulted in resistant or partial resistant, the combined result was regarded as resistant. As can be seen, the combinations yielded high percentages of susceptibility. Combinations with amikacin resulted in over 95% susceptibility, combinations with gentamicin resulted in lower percentages. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Main Enterobacteriaciae species 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 14

4.2. Results from urine cultures (clinic) Clinical urine cultures represent rather routinely taken cultures as well as cultures from patients suspected or diagnosed with urosepsis and urinary tract infections. The most frequent uropathogens are E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis and P. aeruginosa. The various uropathogens showed quite similar distribution over the years reported. 212 213 214 215 216 E. coli 254 29 31 272 284 K. pneumoniae 145 135 155 147 135 P. mirabilis 56 51 62 52 5 P. aeruginosa 38 35 54 39 39 15

Amoxicillin Amoxicillinclavulanic acid Cefuroxime Cefotaxime Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Nitrofurantoin Norfloxacin Ciprofloxacin Tobramycin Meropenem 4.2.1. Results from urine culture (clinic), E. coli Resistance to 3 rd generation cephalosporins, indicative for the presence of ESBL enzymes, decreased further to 13% in 216. Carbapenem susceptibility was 1% in reported isolates in 215 and 216. Other than meropenem, no single antibiotic was effective enough by itself. This warrants the use of cephalosporin plus aminoglycoside in empirical therapy for patients with severe urinary tract infection or urosepsis. Norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin show trends over time in opposing directions with norfloxacin susceptibility decreasing and ciprofloxacin susceptibility increasing. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Escherichia coli - urine clinic - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 16

Amoxicillinclavulanic acid Cefuroxime Cefotaxime Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Nitrofurantoin Norfloxacin Ciprofloxacin Tobramycin Meropenem Suscpetible (%) 4.2.2. Results from urine cultures (clinic), K. pneumoniae K. pneumoniae isolates from urine show similar patterns as in blood cultures with overall high levels of resistance. K. pneumoniae is overall more resistant than E. coli. Meropenem resistance is present in all the years, except 211, indicating the continued circulation of carbapenemase-positive species. The majority of those are of the KPC genotype and, infrequently, of the NDM-1 genotype. Resistance to 3 rd generation cephalosporins, indicative of ESBL enzymes, is over 3% in 216. K. pneumoniae is intrinsically resistant to amoxicillin which is not included in this report. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae - urine clinic - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 17

Amoxicillinclavulanic acid Cefuroxime Cefotaxime Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Norfloxacine Ciprofloxacine Tobramycin Meropenem 4.2.3. Results from urine cultures (clinic), P. mirabilis Cultures of P. mirabilis showed far less resistance overall than K. pneumoniae and E. coli. Meropenem resistance increased notably in the years 214 to 216. In P. mirabilis, meropenem susceptibility testing with the VITEK II system requires confirmatory testing with e-testing and the carbapenem inhibition test (CIT) for the presence of carbapenemases. Except for the cephalosporins, all reported antibiotics showed marked decreases in susceptibility in 216. This downward trend in susceptibility contrasts with the other uropathogens reported. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Proteus mirabilis - urine clinic- adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 18

Ceftazidime Meropenem Ciprofloxacin Tobramycin 4.2.4. Results from urine cultures (clinic), P. aeruginosa Isolates of P. aeruginosa from clinical urine cultures showed an increase of all reported antibiotics when compared to 215. All antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity showed an increase of susceptibility to 9% or higher. Meropenem resistance in P. aeruginosa is frequently caused by other mechanisms than the activity of carbapenemases. The ADC has a procedure in place since 216, for the detection of metallo-betalactamase type carbapenemases. These were not detected. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa - urine clinic - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 19

4.3. Results from urine cultures (general practice) Cultures from general practice provide data on the resistance present in uropathogens. Numerically dominated by E. coli, other species like K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis and P. aeruginosa are far less frequently encountered. Common uncomplicated cystitis is a frequent infectious entity in general practice and is often treated with empirical antibiotic therapy. The data presented in this section show the susceptibility data that determines the efficacy of empirical choices for antibiotic therapy. Nitrofurantoin remains highly effective for the number one pathogen E. coli but is ineffective for P. mirabilis and more than half of K. pneumoniae isolates. Fosfomycin susceptibility was tested for only a selection of isolates and is not included in this report. 212 213 214 215 216 E. coli 312 324 282 272 251 K. pneumoniae 76 72 65 6 55 P. mirabilis 37 4 51 24 35 P. aeruginosa 15 8 16 7 5 2

Amoxicillin Amoxicillinclavulanic acid Cefuroxime Cefotaxime Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Nitrofurantoin Norfloxacin Ciprofloxacin Tobramycin Meropenem 4.3.1. Results from urine cultures (general practice), E. coli E. coli in general practice shows less resistance than the selection of clinical isolates. Nitrofurantoin susceptibility is just under 9% in 215, with lower rates of susceptibility for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and even lower rates for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin. 3 rd generation cephalosporin resistance is 1% in 216, an improvement from 215. Carbapenem resistance was detected in this population only in 214. Norfloxacin showed a marked decrease in susceptibility with 58% of isolates testing susceptible. A notable decrease in norfloxacin susceptibility was also detected in E. coli derived from clinical urine cultures. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Escherichia coli - urine GP - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 21

Amoxicillinclavulanic acid Cefuroxime Cefotaxime Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Nitrofurantoin Norfloxacin Ciprofloxacin Tobramycin Meropenem Suscpetible (%) 4.3.2. Results from urine cultures (general practice), K. pneumoniae Appearing in less cultures than E. coli, K. pneumoniae has a smaller impact on the overall resistance in uropathogens. K. pneumoniae is intrinsically resistant to amoxicillin and in over half of the isolates resistant to nitrofurantoin. Combined with the intrinsic resistance of P. mirabilis to nitrofurantoin, this is a factor to consider for patients in whom nitrofurantoin for cystitis does not work. Meropenem susceptibility remained at 1% in 215 and 216. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae - urine GP - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 22

Amoxiicillin Amoxicillinclavulanic acid Cefuroxime Cefotaxime Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole Norfloxacin Ciprofloxacin Tobramycin Meropenem 4.3.3. Results from urine cultures (general practice), P. mirabilis Cultured less frequently than E. coli, P. mirabilis has a smaller share in the burden of antibiotic resistance in urinary tract infections. It is intrinsically resistant to nitrofurantoin and adds to the nitrofurantoin resistant infections together with K. pneumoniae. 216 isolates of P. mirabilis showed an 82% susceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and over 9% susceptibility to cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. Resistance to meropenem was detected in 214, 215 and in 216, indicating the circulation of carbapenemases in this population. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Proteus mirabilis - urine GP - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 23

Ceftazidime Meropenem Ciprofloxacin Tobramycin 4.3.4. Results for urine cultures (general practice), P. aeruginosa P. aeruginosa is infrequently cultured in urine samples in the general practice. Ciprofloxacin, the only oral antipseudomonal antibiotic was tested susceptible in all five isolates from 216. The overall susceptibility was very similar to the isolates from clinical cultures. The number of included isolates is small and the results may be susceptible to the influence of chance. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa - urine GP - adults 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 24

4. Discussion The 216 report on antibiotic resistance shows concerning rates of resistance in the blood and urine cultures of Curaçao. MRSA was present in bloodcultures from three patients. 215 and 216 saw less MRSA than 214 which is an encouraging trend. MRSA in bloodcultures can be regarded as the very tip of the iceberg of the total burden of MRSA in the population. The number of patients with MRSA in bloodcultures is vastly outnumbered by the asymptomatic MRSA carriers. Most of the control measures to contain the spread of MRSA in SEHOS concerns these numerous carriers in effort to prevent MRSA infections like the three patients in the 216 data set. Despite significant efforts in SEHOS to isolate and eradicate MRSA carriers, some infections were still observed in 216. Further decrease in MRSA infections seems possible and efforts to contain the spread of MRSA need to continue. The rate of resistance in E. coli for 3 rd generation cephalosporins relates to the presence of ESBL enzymes and is near 15% in the hospital isolates and near 1% in GP-derived isolates. In isolates of K. pneumoniae, the rate of ESBL is twice as high. ESBL carriership in admitted patients warrants isolation measures to control spread inside the institution. ESBL-carriers that present with infection in the clinic drive a large proportion of the intramural the meropenem prescriptions. Meropenem usage in turn invites the selective outgrowth of K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-positive (KPC) and other carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae. A constant threat is carbapenem resistance in the gram-negative bacteria of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Carbapenem-resistant isolates can spread within healthcare facilities and counter the efficacy of the last resort antibiotic meropenem. After the 212 KPC outbreak, KPC transmission inside the hospital has largely been halted but KPC and other carbapenemases including NDM-1 are still detected among patients inside and outside SEHOS. Current carbapenemase screening and confirmation is aimed at the detection of two potent carbapenemases: KPC and NDM-1. Less potent carbapenemases of the OXA family are more difficult to detect. Updating of the carbapenemase screening and confirmation algorithm according to the guidelines of CSLI and NVMM complemented with meropenem and imipenem etesting as well as the Carbapenem Inhibition Test (CIT) took place in 217. The CIT replaces the modified Hodge test for two reasons. The CIT has superior sensitivity, repeatability and CIT applies to non-fermenters like Pseudomonas aeruginosa as well. The carbapenem meropenem will remain the mainstay reserve antibiotic in infections with ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae and the AmpC-positive type II Enterobacteriaceae. Any lack of meropenem efficacy in gram-negative bacteria is always alarming and should trigger infection control measures for hospitalized patients. 25

KPC-positive isolates are susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam (Avycaz) but not to aztreonam, whereas NDM-1 positive-isolates ought to be susceptible to aztreonam but not to ceftazidime-avibactam. PCR-based confirmation of the two enzymes is locally available but hardly ever requested. Neither of these two antibiotics are currently stocked because the number of patients that would require treatment with these drugs is (luckily) very small. Ad-hoc ordering usually takes longer than clinical relevancy lasts. Another option would be oral or intravenous fosfomycin which is supported by a growing base of evidence. Local fosfomycin susceptibility among the Enterobacteriaceae is unknown but will be included in the 217 report. Aminoglycosides like gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin are obvious effective and cheap antibiotics to complement cephalosporins and carbapenems. Their use is restricted due to the lack of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in Curaçao and the number of patients with renal disease. This situation puts patients at risk for toxicity resulting in severe and permanent side effects rendering patients deaf or dialysis dependent. TDM of gentamicin was introduced by ADC and SEHOS independently and facilitates the safe use of this aminoglycoside. resistance is considerable and some KPC-positive strains test only susceptible to amikacin and colistin. The 216 report on antimicrobial resistance both underscores and supports the continuing effort to counter antimicrobial resistance in Curaçao. The standardized periodic reporting of resistance in the most common bacterial pathogens is important to monitor effectiveness of current policies. It allows physicians to estimate the efficacy of empirical therapies. Although colistin and amikacin were not included in the 216 report, resistance to both drugs was detected and will be included in the 217 report. The data presented in this report call for action to counter antimicrobial resistance. Resistance rates tend to decrease (except for P. mirabilis) or at least are stable which is a strong support to the ongoing efforts to control the spread of resistance. Some territories remain uncharted, notably the long-stay facilities in Curaçao. Expansion of antimicrobial stewardship inside and outside of SEHOS may further enhance the upward trend in susceptibility as noted in this report. The implementation of a National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (NAP-AMR) should further resolve gaps in surveillance and control in Curaçao. Failure to do so may result in regression in current trends and would likely require far more expensive antibiotic drugs to be introduced into the Curaçao healthcare system in the near future. 26