Moorhead, Minnesota. Photo Credit: FEMA, Evaluating Losses Avoided Through Acquisition: Moorhead, MN

Similar documents
27% 79K CAYUGA COUNTY, NY: PROFILE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS

Parley s Historic Nature Park Management Plan

Characterizing Social Vulnerability: a NFIE Integration

Park, Recreation & Open Space Master Plan 2015

Background, Key Issues, SLC Policies, Existing Parks, National Comparison. Voice & Tag Program, Fee Program, Limited Hours, Volunteer Roles

Agency Profile. At A Glance

NCDA&CS, Veterinary Division, Animal Welfare Section

MINUTES TOWN BOARD MEETING AUGUST 20, 2018

EXCLUSIVE INVESTMENT SUMMARY 1453 DIAMOND HILL ROAD WOONSOCKET, RHODE ISLAND

OUTAGAMIE COUNTY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS / PROPOSAL FOR PARK PLANNING AND PRE DESIGN SERVICES DUE BY: MARCH 12, 2018

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

Nesting Swainson s Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) in the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Area 2003 Annual Survey Results

110th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1464

5 September 10, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

2013 AVMA Veterinary Workforce Summit. Workforce Research Plan Details

Progress at a Turtle s Pace: the Lake Jackson Ecopassage Project. Matthew J. Aresco, Ph.D. Lake Jackson Ecopassage Alliance

4MRVWG Dog Park Committee

Who Am I? What are some things you can do to help protect my home? Track: Ohio Department of Natural Resources Photo: Cottonwood Canyons Foundation

TRANSIT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Summary Thursday January 13, 2011

Managing Uplands with Keystone Species. The Case of the Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus)

Woonsocket Data in Your Backyard

2014 Albany Residents Community Survey

GAO Earned Value Management (EVM) Audit Findings

SOSSAMAN CLOUD PARK. Site Conditions

Reasons: Why consider allowing backyard chickens in the urban and suburban areas of Saanich?

Tick Surveillance in Loudoun County, VA Spring Lauren Lochstampfor Andy Lima VMCA, February 12, 2014

The Importance Of Atlasing; Utilizing Amphibian And Reptile Data To Protect And Restore Michigan Wetlands

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

MOORHEAD. Logo Usage Guide. City of Moorhead

The Economic Impacts of the U.S. Pet Industry (2015)

Versatile Coir Wattles Offer Cost-Effective Sediment Control at Construction Sites

Cache Community Dog Park Logan, Cache County, Utah A Proposal to Develop an Off-Leash Dog Park in Cache Valley By the Cache Humane Society

St. Clair Reservoir Rehabilitation: Proposed Changes to Sir Winston Churchill Park Dogs Off-Leash Area and Tennis Courts

North Star K9 Training Association. Trailing Certification Testing

Action Requested ACTION STEPS:

CHAPTER 3 POLICE REGULATIONS 343. LIMITATIONS ON THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS AS PETS

2014 BOBCAT MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES

2017 ANIMAL SHELTER STATISTICS

Embracing the Open Pet Pharmaceutical Transition

Skilled Occupation List

Policy Number: L Approved Date: March 6, 2017 Review Date: March 6, Leeward Community College Animals on Campus Policy

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. December 11-13, 2017

MINUTES PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING February 18, 2015 Chino Hills Government Center City Center Drive, Chino Hills, California

Feral Poultry: How to Construct a User-Friendly Trap

Findings from the 2014 Rhode Island Kids Count Factbook

A REGULATION OF THE CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU, ALASKA

CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION April 21, :00 p.m. Wheat Ridge Recreation Center Dahlia Room, 4005 Kipling Street AGENDA

Initiatives for Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance in the Environment. Executive Summary

Site Selection and Environmental Assessment for Terrestrial Invertebrates, Amphibians and Reptiles

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. January 19 and 24-25, 2018

Dog Parks. Every dog deserves a great day at the park!

October 1, 2013 Work Session Discussion Item Potential Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment relating to Animals Animal ordinance research provided by staff

Canada Goose Management Practices Jake Nave

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Ecological Studies of Wolves on Isle Royale

City of Port Moody Minutes

North Florida. Agricultural, Recreational & Development Tracts. Bank Owned. Suwannee County, FL

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. January 8-11, 2019

4-H Dog Obedience Proficiency Program A Member s Guide

A MODEL TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE: RAISING AND KEEPING OF CHICKENS 1

NH Reptile and Amphibian Reporting Program (RAARP) & NH Wildlife Sightings

1.0 SUMMARY OF THE ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE ENVIRONMENT: PROJECT OBJECTIVES, SOLUTIONS AND ACHIEVEMENTS

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1999 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 1184

Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska Parks & Recreation Department

North Star K9 Training Association Trailing Urban Certification Testing

Humber Bay Park Project Survey Online Summary of Findings Report

Report to the Raleigh Parks, Recreation and Greenway Advisory Board: Off-leash Dog Areas. Background

REPORT OF ACTIVITIES TURTLE ECOLOGY RESEARCH REPORT Crescent Lake National Wildlife Refuge 31 May to 4 July 2017

CERTIFIED ASSISTANCE DOG TRAINER

What is targeting? Focusing limited resources in a geographic area of high need in order to maximize impact.

7550: THE PLOUGH INN, BRABOURNE LEES, KENT BRIEFING NOTE: KCC ECOLOGY RESPONSE 17/01610/AS

Steps Towards a Blanding s Turtle Recovery Plan in Illinois: status assessment and management

Cayuga County Shared Services Plan. PANEL MEETING 5 JULY 13, 2018 Cayuga-Onondaga BOCES Aurelius

2017 Regional Envirothon

EGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Dearborn, Michigan. March 07, 2016

COUNTY OF LINCOLN, NORTH CAROLINA

Ottawa Urban Turtle Sanctuary. Finding and fighting for road-free refuges. in the National Capital Region

Friends of Lake Claremont News

RESPONSIBLE ANTIMICROBIAL USE

FDA Consumer Antimicrobial Handwash Proposed Rule: What Does It Mean and Does It Impact Healthcare or Not? Megan J. DiGiorgio MSN, RN, CIC

Meeting Notes: Project team gave a presentation to provide background; available at

University Council on Animal Care

K E N N E L L I C E N S E A P P L I C A T I O N

Basin Wildlife. Giant Garter Snake

Chapter 190 URBAN CHICKEN

The No Kill Equation

Personal Protection: Topical Repellents

The story of Solo the Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge Male Swan

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Study Objectives: 1. To determine annually an index of statewide turkey populations and production success in Georgia.

Structured Decision Making: A Vehicle for Political Manipulation of Science May 2013

Attend TRAINING for Your Volunteer Position You will meet with a designated staff member or volunteer who will train you in your new role.

Gulf Oil Spill ESSM 651

Pets for Life. Door-to-door owner support services within underserved communities

Mayflower, Arkansas Comprehensive Plan 2012

ROGER IRWIN. 4 May/June 2014

Western Painted Turtle Monitoring and Habitat Restoration at Buttertubs Marsh, Nanaimo, BC

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 11/18/16 Page 1 of 11

NASDN TASK BOOK K9 MANTRAILING

GREATER SAGE-GROUSE BROOD-REARING HABITAT MANIPULATION IN MOUNTAIN BIG SAGEBRUSH, USE OF TREATMENTS, AND REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY ON PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH

EAGLE RIVER/CHUGIAK PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT

Transcription:

Moorhead, Minnesota Photo Credit: FEMA, 2010. Evaluating Losses Avoided Through Acquisition: Moorhead, MN

Background Moorhead is a midsize city (pop. 38,065) in Clay County, Minnesota. The largest city in the northwest of the state, Moorhead is bordered on the west by the Red River. Across the river lies the city of Fargo, North Dakota. The land around the Fargo and Moorhead area is among the flattest and most fertile in the world due to its location on the lakebed of glacial Lake Agassiz, which drained between 9,900 and 11,000 years ago. Although agriculture is prominent in the area, Moorhead is also home to notable corporate, manufacturing and distribution industries. The unemployment rate in Moorhead is consistently below the national average and property values are stable in the area. Figure 1: Location of Moorhead, Minnesota History of Flooding and Mitigation The City of Moorhead has experienced its fair share of flooding, given its location along the Red River. Flooding occurred in 1993, 1994, 1997, 2002, 2006, 2009, 2010 and 2011. In 1993, an unusual weather pattern generated drenching rains in the Northern Mississippi River valley. With already saturated soil from a large snow pack the previous winter, combined with a very rainy April, conditions were ripe for a major flood. Over Mother s Day weekend, heavy rainfall caused flooding that continued through much of the summer, causing widespread flooding in Minnesota. Table 1: Moorhead Demographic Info Moorhead Minnesota

Population (2010) 38,065 5,303,925 Median age 28.3 37.4 Housing units 15,274 2,347,201 Owner occupied (%) 61.2 72.1 Black (%) 2.0 5.2 White (%) 90.7 85.3 Hispanic or Latino (%) 4.1 4.7 High school degree (%) 93.8 92.3 Bachelor s degree (%) 34.0 33.2 Median household income $49,514 $60,828 Poverty rate 15.9 11.5 Source: US Census, 2010 and American Community Survey 2014 Table 1 compares demographics of the city to the state. Moorhead compares to the state for the factors of education and the percentage of HIspanics or Latinos. In contracts, population percentages of White and Black residents differ, as does the median age, median income, and poverty rates. In 1997, heavy winter snow and ice accumulations, in addition to a rapid thaw in the spring, resulted in catastrophic flooding of the Red River. The river crested at 39.5 feet, flooding homes and businesses in the community. In following years, major flooding recurred in 2001, 2006, 2009 and 2010. Flooding along the Red River Photo credit: FEMA, 2010 Loss Avoidance Study In 2006, the fifth highest flood on record hit the Moorhead area. This time damage from floodwaters along the Red River was minimal thanks to buyouts and a sandbag dike. Between 1994-2002, the city had acquired 26 homes along the river. Furthermore, in 2006, approximately 100 homeowners built dikes to the 38-foot flood height to protect their properties. The 2006 floods were, at the time, the fourth highest on record. However, in 2009 the area experienced record flooding which reached a height of 40.84 feet. After years of annual community sandbagging efforts, Moorhead decided to pursue extensive buyouts. As a result, extensive areas along the river have been transferred from private property to public use, primarily for flood protection and recreation. Figure 2 shows the location of levees and sandbag barriers put in place along the Red River, in the northern section of Moorhead, during the 2009 flood. Source: City of Moorhead Maps: http://www.ci.moorhead.mn.us/home/showdocument?id=286

The primary goal of the buyouts was to create open space for the development of flood barriers in the form of levees and floodwalls (Figure 2). As a result, Moorhead targeted riverfront properties and initially prioritized homes with the smallest difference between first floor elevation and the elevation of the highest adjacent grade. Over time Moorhead shifted to a neighborhood-based approach and prioritized one area north of town and one area to the south. Figure 2: Levees and Sandbags on the Red River The Buyout The buyout began in 2010, and 264 homes were acquired in total. HMGP funds from FEMA were used to purchase two homes, while the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Funds and local matching funds were used to acquire the remaining 262 homes. The state funds had local match requirement equal to 2% of median household income multiplied by the number households. Although the minimum match requirement at this time was $12 million, Moorhead ultimately provided approximately $33 million. State funding was $72 million, adding to a total of $105 million. By using state and local funds, Moorhead was able to greatly expedite the buyout process and avoid lengthy delays associated with getting FEMA approval of HMGP projects. It also gave them greater flexibility in how they could utilize and manage the properties after acquisition. Specifically, it freed them from HGMP rules prohibiting the construction of levees and floodwalls on buyout lands. In addition, few of the homes had a recent history of flooding due to sandbagging and many would not have qualified for HMGP funds. This was a voluntary program and the city found that, on average, appraised values were equal to 108 percent of the tax assessed value. To expedite the process, offers were made based on 108 percent of the assessed value. This process was used between 2010 and 2013. Since 2013, Moorhead has used appraisals to determine purchase price. The city lacked programs to encourage participants to relocate to other locations in the city and it did not track

where participants moved. The City Engineers Office and the Planning Department oversaw the buyout program. Figure 3 shows two areas where buyouts occurred along the Red River in Moorhead. Acquired parcels are outlined in red. Parcels highlighted in orange indicate where property owners rejected an offer to participate in the buyout, while those marked in green indicate where new homes were constructed, 27 in all, in the floodplain since the buyouts occurred. Figure 3: Buyouts in Moorhead Current Status Moorhead has acquired approximately 226 acres of riverfront property since 1990. In terms of current land usages, the most restrictive are on the 20.7 acres acquired with FEMA funds. These areas can only be used for open space, recreational or wetland management purposes, dictated by FEMA restrictions. The remaining land can be used for public utility infrastructure and flood control structures. Table 3: Total Number and Value of Homes Removed

Total homes in Moorhead 15,274 Homes acquired in buyout 264 Total cost of buyout $105,000,000 Average cost per home $397,727 Homes remaining in flood hazard area N/A Value of homes remaining in flood hazard area N/A In Moorhead, levees and floodwalls were built as far from the river as possible. Much of this land between the river and the flood control structures has been allowed to return to its natural state. Wild turkeys and deer were seen during the site visit. The City of Moorhead completed Master Plan for the Red River Corridor in 2014. The plan presents a long term vision and strategy to guide the management and use of the Red River Corridor in Moorhead (https://www.cityofmoorhead.com/home/showdocument?id=956). The vision includes flood management, recreation, connectivity and habitat enhancement. The goal of habitat enhancement is to increase the area of native vegetation through preservation and restoration. Habitats proposed for restoration include prairie, oak savanna and floodplain forest. Integration with Hazard Mitigation Plan The Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation plan lists flooding as one of the hazards that present the highest risk to the state and the greatest potential for mitigation. In addition, the City of Moorhead states that its floodplain management goals are to minimize risk to life, health, safety, commerce, and governmental services and to avoid extreme public expenditures and impairment to the tax base. Its buyout program, coupled with the construction of levees, protects property and minimizes the risk of future flooding along the river. Integration with Land Use Plan The Clay County Community-Based Comprehensive Plan, which serves Moorhead, does not reference the buyout program in its planning framework for land use and growth. Conclusion Moorhead's buyout program, financed with state and local funds, led to the expedited removal of 264 homes from the floodplain, with the objective of freeing space to build levees and floodwalls and reducing future flood risk. Moorhead's strategy to prioritize the removal of riverfront properties, later amended to focus on a neighborhood-based approach, helped avoid the piecemeal approach that limits many buyouts. A number of homeowners rejected the buyout, thus limiting recreational uses along the river (e.g., a continuous, uninterrupted walking trail along the river) and compromises efforts to restore and link wildlife habitat as well.

As a result of the buyouts, the city has acquired 226 acres of riverfront property that can now be used for open space, recreation, and wetland management (where regulated by FEMA) and for public utility infrastructure and flood control (where not regulated by FEMA). Moorhead's river corridor master plan, completed in 2014, further refines the city's strategy to manage and maintain the Red River Corridor in the event of future flooding. References Cited City of Moorhead and Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments. 2014. Moorhead River Corridor Master Plan. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2010. Evaluating Losses Avoided Through Acquisition Projects: Moorhead, Minnesota.