Case 3:16-cv JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 9

Similar documents
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS

ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS

Argued May 9, 2017 Decided September 5, Before Judges Messano and Espinosa.

APPENDIX B TOWN OF CLINTON DOG ORDINANCE

Subject ANIMAL BITES, ABUSE, CRUELTY & SEVERE NEGLECT. 12 August By Order of the Police Commissioner

District Attorney s Office

Use of a Police dog during an arrest in Titahi Bay

LOCAL LAW. Town of Alfred. Local Law No. 2 for the year A Local Law Entitled Dog Control Law for the Town of Alfred

IN THE JUSTICE COURT/CITY COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF GALLATIN, MONTANA ************************************************

ANTI-DOG ENFORCEMENT - What Every Dog Owner Needs to Know

IN THE LINE OF DUTY. What Dogs Try To Tell Cops

IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 2:07-cr MMB Document 39 Filed 06/23/08 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOINT PROPOSED PRETRIAL ORDER. This parties do not dispute that the court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331

CHAPTER 604 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

INFORMATION TO HELP WITH BARKING DOGS IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX

The Corporation of the Town of Essex. Appeal Hearing with Resped to a Notice to Muzzle

General Offense Information. Offenses (Completed/Attempted) Related Event(s) Related Person(s) AURORA POLICE DEPARTMENT

Use of Police dog during arrests in Auckland

Kachenkov v Vadala 2013 NY Slip Op 30971(U) May 3, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 12736/11 Judge: Bernice Daun Siegal Republished from New

Dep t of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Schoentube OATH Index No. 1677/17 (Mar. 10, 2017)

TROPIC TOWN ORDINANCE NO

WOODSTOCK DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE Approved 3/30/1992 Amended 3/26/2007. Definitions, as used in this ordinance, unless the context otherwise indicates.

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF GALLIPOLIS, onto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Richmond Division VERIFIED COMPLAINT IN REM

ESWDA. Police Service Test

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY COLORADO RESOLUTION NUMBER

TOWN OF GORHAM ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

TOWN OF LUDLOW, VERMONT DOG ORDINANCE

Initial Investigation Report Date: February 1, 2015 Department Case # New World Case #

Animal Control Law Village of Bergen Local Law Number 2 of 2018

SANDUSKY POLICE DEPARTMENT Non Offense Detailed SPD ANIMALBITE - Animal Bite Printed On: 05/27/2015 4:03 PM

Investigative Report City of Salem

Animal Control Ordinance

SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO A Bylaw to regulate the keeping of dogs within the Keats Island Dog Control Service Area

The Story of Steven Avery s 1985 Conviction for Rape, Exoneration and the 2005 Arrest for the Murder of Teresa Halbach

Hear 911 call: Witness tried to stop fatal attack b

City of San Mateo BARKING DOG COMPLAINTS

RESOLUTION: BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED That the City of Shelton adopt the Vicious Dogs "Gracie's Law" Ordinance as follows following Ordinance:

DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

Defendant, an assistant dog warden, is charged with negligently administering an intramuscular

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION NO. 2:15-CV-42-BO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TOWN OF WOODSTOCK ORDINANCE REGULATING DOGS AND WOLF-HYBRIDS

FACTS Investigation at the scene

TEXAS DOG BITE CLAIMS

MINUTES Administrative Board of Appeals December 18, 2017

DOGBITES - LOS ANGELES TIMES. Los Angeles Times - Valley Section October 12, 1998 p. B1. Man's Best Friend a Worst Nightmare

ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF BURKE ADOPTED: OCTOBER 1, 2001 EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 1, 2001 ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

TMCEC Bench Book CHAPTER 17 ANIMALS. Dangerous Dogs. 1. Dogs that Are a Danger to Persons. Definitions:

1 SB By Senators Livingston and Scofield. 4 RFD: Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry. 5 First Read: 25-JAN-18.

BY-LAW 48 DOG CONTROL BY-LAW

+ PLUS. feature. legal advice K-9 and Public Relations. featured department $9.95. Meet the Trainer The Navy SEAL Way: A One-on-One with Mike Ritland

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

Draft for Public Hearing. Town of East Haddam. Chapter (Number to be Assigned) CONTROL OF ANIMALS ORDINANCE

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

CITY OF MEADOW LAKE BYLAW #18/2012 DOG BYLAW

CORYELL COUNTY RABIES CONTROL ORDINANCE NO

Notice to Muzzle Dog Pursuant to City of London By-Law PH 4. Address: 203 Grenfell Place London, Ont., Postal Code: NSX 3B7

POLICE K9 UNIVERSITY 2016 NINO DROWAERT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Town of Northumberland LOCAL LAW 3 OF 2010 DOG CONTROL LAW

Be it enacted, by the Council of the Town of Wolfville under the authority of Sections 172 and 175 of the Municipal Government Act, as amended:

TITLE 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 DOGS

TOWN OF SUMNER DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Richmond Division

CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF HUNTSVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER Being a By-law for the Control and Licensing of Dogs

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Hamilton (hereinafter referred to. as the City ) is empowered to enact ordinances to protect

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

Connecticut Police Work Dog Association

FRANCISCAN VILLAGE ANIMAL OWNERSHIP RULES

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) ) ) Plaintiff ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) J. Keenan Sprague, for the Plaintiff REASONS FOR DECISION

NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 4.8

Reptiles on the Prowl

ANIMALS ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL

PROPOSED LOCAL LAW #1 FOR THE YEAR 2014 LICENSING & CONTROL OF DOGS IN THE TOWN OF TAYLOR

CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS. Owner: Any person, group of persons, or corporation owning, keeping or harboring animals.

LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 2010 LICENSING AND SETTING LICENSING FEES OF DOGS

Service Animals and the ADA: What You Need to Know. April 2014 Seyfarth Shaw LLP

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D09-588

1 Pursuant to City of London By-law PH

Article VIII. Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Vicious Dogs

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

PLEASE NOTE. authority of the Queen s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law.

GENERAL ORDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. February 18, 2005 Rescinds General Order RAR (Canine Teams) [Effective Date: October 7, 2002] I.

Title 6 ANIMALS. Chapter 6.04 ANIMAL CONTROL

3. Dog Box - 37 ½ inches wide by 42 inches long.

LAW AND ORDER CODE Title 16 Animal Control

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

MUST REGISTER IN PERSON AT:

FEBRUARY 2014 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

D. August 1, 2017 Minutes 11:30am approval was deferred due to missing testimony and reference to the closing arguments.

MILLER V. CLARK COUNTY United States Court of Appeals, 9 th Circuit (August 21, 2003) Dad: Please get citation!

Evidence Search. By Deborah Palman, Maine Warden Service

Dog Licensing Regulation

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS WITNESS STATEMENT

September 25, Glynn County Board of Commissioners. Matt Doering, Chief of Police

TITLE 5 ANIMALS ANIMALS 1

Transcription:

Case 3:16-cv-00105-JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION GABRIEL STEELE, individually, and as Executor of the Estate of AUTUMN STEELE, and as next of friend for minor G.S., Sean Schoff, as next of friend for minor K.S., and GINA COLBERT, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF BURLINGTON and JESSE HILL, Civil No. 3:16-cv-105 *FILED UNDER SEAL* DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. COME NOW, Defendants, City of Burlington and Jesse Hill, by and through their attorneys, Betty, Neuman & McMahon, P.L.C., and for their Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Southern District of Iowa Local Rule 56 state: 1. On January 5, 2015, Gabriel Steele called 9-1-1 for police assistance at his residence at 104 South Garfield Avenue, Burlington, Iowa, for a domestic disturbance with his wife, Autumn Steele. (Appendix 9-18). 2. Gabriel informed the responding Burlington police officers that Autumn struck him with a metal spatula during an argument, leaving red marks and an outline of the spatula on his body. (Appendix 9-18). 3. Autumn was arrested and was taken to jail on January 5, 2015 for domestic assault. (Appendix 9-18). 1

Case 3:16-cv-00105-JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 2 of 9 4. The next morning, January 6, 2015, Gabriel was shoveling snow at their 104 South Garfield Avenue residence. (Appendix 19-20). 5. Autumn returned to the residence while Gabriel was shoveling snow. (Appendix 20-21). 6. An argument ensued between Gabriel and Autumn. (Appendix 21). 7. While they were arguing, Gabriel called 9-1-1 and requested police assistance from the dispatcher. (Appendix 1; 21). 8. Gabriel told the dispatcher Autumn was trying to take [their] son and asked for the police to hurry to his residence. (Appendix 1). 9. Burlington Police Officers Jesse Hill and Timothy Merryman responded to the Steele residence to investigate the domestic disturbance reported by Gabriel. (Appendix 2-3; 25-27). 10. After placing the 9-1-1 call, Gabriel picked up their minor son, G.S., and proceeded to exit the residence. (Appendix 22-24). 11. Autumn followed Gabriel outside and began physically striking Gabriel while he was holding their child, G.S. (Appendix 22-24). 12. Officer Hill was the first officer to arrive at the Steeles residence. (Appendix 2-3; 26). 13. Officer Hill observed Gabriel walking away from his residence on a nearby sidewalk while holding a minor child and Autumn was following Gabriel. (Appendix 26). 14. Officer Hill observed Autumn was holding the back of Gabriel s coat and striking him multiple times with an opened and closed fist against his head and neck area. (Appendix 26). 2

Case 3:16-cv-00105-JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 3 of 9 15. Officer Hill further observed an unrestrained black and brown German Shepherdlooking dog near the Steeles during the altercation. (Appendix 26). 16. Officer Hill exited his vehicle and activated his body camera. (Appendix 26). 17. Officer Hill informed dispatch that the Steeles were fighting and proceeded on foot towards the Steeles. (Appendix 2, 0:00 0:01 1 ; 26). 18. Approximately four seconds after activating his body camera, Officer Hill reached Autumn s location and verbally ordered her to stop assaulting Gabriel. (Appendix 2, 0:04). 19. Officer Hill further began to place both of his hands on Autumn s shoulders to prevent her from further assaulting Gabriel. (Appendix 2, 0:04; 26). 20. Approximately four-to-five seconds after activating his body camera, the Steeles dog, Sammy, barks near Officer Hill. (Appendix 2, 0:04 0:05). 21. Around the time he was attempting to physically remove Autumn away from Gabriel, Officer Hill recalls feeling the sensation of being bitten in his upper left thigh area by the Steeles dog. (Appendix 26). 22. Officer Hill then verbally commanded the Steeles to get [their] dog. (Appendix 2, 0:05 0:06; 26). 23. Immediately after Officer Hill ordered the Steeles to get their dog, the dog, Sammy, began barking more intensely and growling near Officer Hill. (Appendix 2, 0:05 0:07). 24. Officer Hill attempted to backpedal away from the dog. (Appendix 26). 1 All specific time-stamp references regarding Appendix 2 begin at the start of the video file, 0:00. 3

Case 3:16-cv-00105-JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 4 of 9 25. Officer Hill observed that the Steele s dog was advancing towards him with its teeth showing. (Appendix 26). 26. As he was backpedaling, Officer Hill drew his service weapon, pointed it at the dog, and discharged a round at a downward angle towards the dog. (Appendix 2, 0:07; 26). 27. As he was shooting at the dog Officer Hill lost his footing on the snow-covered sidewalk, began to fall backwards, and discharged another round towards the dog. (Appendix 2, 0:07; 26). 28. While shooting and falling backwards, Officer Hill perceived the Steeles dog was still advancing towards him. (Appendix 2; 26). 29. Both rounds fired by Officer Hill were discharged in less than a second of each other. (Appendix 2, 0:07). 30. Officer Hill testified that, at the time of discharging his weapon towards the Steeles dog, he was fearful for his safety and well-being against bodily injury from the dog. (Appendix 28-30). 31. Approximately eight seconds elapsed between the time that Officer Hill activated his body camera and the time the last round was discharged from his service weapon. (Appendix 2, 0:00 0:08). 32. Autumn, Gabriel and G.S. did not state anything to Officer Hill prior to the discharge of his firearm that they would restrain their dog, Sammy. (Appendix 2, 0:00 0:07). 33. Prior to firing any shots from his firearm, Officer Hill did not issue any commands to Gabriel or G.S. indicating that they were not free to leave the area or that they were being detained or placed under arrest. (Appendix 2, 0:00 0:07; 31-32). 4

Case 3:16-cv-00105-JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 5 of 9 34. Officer Hill also did not physically touch Gabriel or G.S. at any point in time on January 6, 2015. (Appendix 2). 35. After both rounds from Officer Hill s service weapon were discharged, Gabriel asked Autumn if Officer Hill shot her. (Appendix 2, 0:10). 36. Gabriel then asked Officer Hill if he shot Autumn. (Appendix 2, 0:13). 37. Officer Hill responded to Gabriel s question by stating Did I? Oh my god. (Appendix 2; 0:14). 38. Gabriel then asked Autumn again if she had been shot. (Appendix 2, 0:15). 39. Gabriel then exclaimed to Officer Hill that he had shot Autumn. (Appendix 2, 0:22). 40. Officer Hill responded to Gabriel s statement by stating Did I--Did I really? (Appendix 2, 0:23 0:24). 41. Officer Hill began to investigate whether Autumn was struck by any rounds discharged from his firearm and requested an ambulance to arrive at the scene. (Appendix 2, 0:28 0:33). 42. Officer Merryman arrived to the scene after Officer Hill s shots had been fired. (Appendix 2). 43. Officer Hill informed Officer Merryman that the dog attacked him, he pulled his service weapon to shoot the dog, and that Autumn appeared to have been struck. (Appendix 2, 1:02 1:06). 44. Officers Hill and Merryman began to administer emergency aid to attempt to resuscitate Autumn. (Appendix 2-3). 45. Additional police officers and paramedics arrived to the scene. (Appendix 2-3). 5

Case 3:16-cv-00105-JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 6 of 9 46. Shortly after the shooting incident occurred, G.S. was taken across the street to a neighbor s house. (Appendix 3, 7:03 7:08 2 ; 58). 47. Autumn was placed into an ambulance to receive medical treatment from paramedics. (Appendix 2-3). 48. Officer Merryman spoke to Gabriel after the incident and asked Gabriel whether the dog was attacking Officer Hill at the time of the shooting. (Appendix 3, 5:25 5:58) 49. In response to Officer Merryman s questions, Gabriel stated that their dog was going towards [Officer Hill], yeah. (Appendix 3, 5:57 5:58). 50. Gabriel further told Officer Merryman that Officer Hill drew his pistol and shot at their dog when it was going towards him. (Appendix 3, 6:01 6:04). 51. Gabriel later made a telephone call to another individual in the presence of Officer Merryman. (Appendix 3, 14:30). 52. While recounting the shooting incident to the person on the phone in front of Officer Merryman, Gabriel stated the dog tried to attack Officer Hill. (Appendix 3, 14:50 14:58). 53. Gabriel testified during his deposition that, to him, the phrase that a dog attacked a person means the dog bit or mauled the person. (Appendix 7-8). 54. Gabriel and G.S. were not struck by any rounds discharged from Officer Hill s service weapon on January 6, 2015. (Appendix 2-3). 55. Gabriel and G.S. were not told by any Burlington police officers that they were being detained, arrested, or were not free to leave the scene on January 6, 2015. (Appendix 2-3). 2 All specific time-stamp references to Appendix 3 begin at the start of the video file, 0:00. 6

Case 3:16-cv-00105-JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 7 of 9 56. Gabriel voluntarily stayed near the shooting scene on January 6, 2015 and voluntarily responded to questions asked by Burlington police officers regarding his observations of the shooting incident. (Appendix 2-3). 57. Gabriel and G.S. were not physically restrained by any Burlington police officers on January 6, 2015. (Appendix 2-3). 58. Autumn was fatally wounded on January 6, 2015. (Complaint Docket#1, 27). 59. The Iowa Department of Criminal Investigations ( DCI ) investigated the January 6, 2015 shooting incident involving Officer Hill and the Steeles. (Appendix 35-36). 60. The investigating DCI agents were unable to determine from their investigation if Autumn was struck by the first or second round fired by Officer Hill. (Appendix 36). 61. DCI agents determined that the Steeles dog, Sammy, was a German Shepherdmix weighing approximately eighty (80) pounds. (Appendix 39). 62. DCI agents further determined that the Steeles dog, Sammy, sustained a gunshot wound to its right shoulder which appeared to be a grazing wound. (Appendix 39-41). 63. After the shooting incident, Officer Hill was treated by Dr. Brandon Beauchamp at Great River Medical Center in West Burlington, Iowa. (Appendix 42-43). 64. Officer Hill was diagnosed with and provided treatment for a dog bite injury to his left lower extremity. (Appendix 42-43). 65. Dr. Beauchamp testified that, while providing treatment to Officer Hill, he found evidence of a dog bite in the form of an abrasion to Officer Hill s left anterior thigh. (Appendix 47-48). 66. Dr. Beauchamp further testified that the abrasion appeared to be relatively new. (Appendix 49). 7

Case 3:16-cv-00105-JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 8 of 9 67. On November 14, 2016, Plaintiffs filed the above-captioned lawsuit against Defendants City of Burlington and Officer Jesse Hill. (Complaint Docket #1). 68. Burlington Police Department s written Use of Force policy, in relevant part, authorizes its officers to use deadly force only when the officer reasonably believes the action is: (a). In defense of human life, including officer s life or (b). In defense of any person in immediate danger of serious physical injury (Appendix 59-60). BETTY, NEUMAN & McMAHON, P.L.C. By: /s/ Martha L. Shaff Martha L. Shaff #AT0007215 By: /s/ Brandon W. Lobberecht Brandon W. Lobberecht #AT0011918 1900 East 54 th Street Davenport, IA 52807-2708 T: 563-326-4491 F: 563-326-4498 E: mls@bettylawfirm.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, CITY OF BURLINGTON and JESSE HILL 8

Case 3:16-cv-00105-JEG-SBJ Document 102 Filed 09/12/18 Page 9 of 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR ELECTRONIC FILINGS I hereby certify that on January 12, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using the ECF system and a true copy of the foregoing was served either electronically or by U.S. First Class Mail upon the following: David A. O Brien Dave O Brien Law 1500 Center St NE Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402 T: 319-861-3001 F: 319-861-3007 E: dave@daveobrienlaw.com John M. Shelnutt Shulnutt Law Firm 601 S 5th Gadsden, AL 35901 T: 256-547-4988 E: jms@shelnuttlaw.com Adam J. Klein Law Offices of Adam J. Klein 6 Concourse Parkway, Suite 2920 Atlanta, GA 30328 T: 678-825-5529 F: 404-475-3091 E: aklein@adamkleinlaw.com Trent A. Henkelvig Henkelvig Law 314 N. 4th St. Burlington, IA 52601 T: 319-753-5411 F: 866-255-4581 E: TAHenkelvig@iabar.org /s/ Brandon W. Lobberecht 9