Source: Portland State University Population Research Center (

Similar documents
EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Update

Healthcare-associated Infections Annual Report December 2018

HEALTH SERVICES POLICY & PROCEDURE MANUAL

Safe Patient Care Keeping our Residents Safe Use Standard Precautions for ALL Residents at ALL times

4/3/2017 CLINICAL PEARLS: UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA DISCLOSURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Ca-MRSA Update- Hand Infections. Washington Hand Society September 19, 2007

Does Screening for MRSA Colonization Have A Role In Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Programs?

Community-Associated C. difficile Infection: Think Outside the Hospital. Maria Bye, MPH Epidemiologist May 1, 2018

1/30/ Division of Disease Control and Health Protection. Division of Disease Control and Health Protection

Annual Surveillance Summary: Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections in the Military Health System (MHS), 2016

Staph Cases. Case #1

Annual Surveillance Summary: Methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections in the Military Health System (MHS), 2017

Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: Emerging Bacterial Resistance

In-Service Training Program. Managing Drug-Resistant Organisms in Long-Term Care

Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in the Province of British Columbia

TACKLING THE MRSA EPIDEMIC

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Is Cefazolin Inferior to Nafcillin for Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia?

Mrsa abscess and cellulitis

Summary of the latest data on antibiotic resistance in the European Union

8/17/2016 ABOUT US REDUCTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE THROUGH THE USE OF AN ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM

In This Issue: Community-Associated MRSA Infection Surveillance in Washoe County Final Report For Health Care Providers

Surveillance of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms

Appropriate Antimicrobial Therapy for Treatment of

Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Site and Epidemiologic Classification, United States, 2005a. Copyright restrictions may apply.

Healthcare-associated infections surveillance report

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia differ depending on the control group chosen

Annual survey of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 2008

Meropenem for all? Midge Asogan ICU Fellow (also ID AT)

Le infezioni di cute e tessuti molli

MRSA Outbreak in Firefighters

Staphylococcus aureus and Health Care associated Infections

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in the Province of British Columbia. August Epidemiology Services British Columbia Centre for Disease Control

Felipe N. Gutierrez MD, MPH Chief, Infectious Diseases Phoenix VA Healthcare

Bacterial infections complicating cirrhosis

What bugs are keeping YOU up at night?

LINEE GUIDA: VALORI E LIMITI

Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) The drug resistant `Superbug that won t die

Infections caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus

Geoffrey Coombs 1, Graeme Nimmo 2, Julie Pearson 1, Samantha Cramer 1 and Keryn Christiansen 1

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

3/1/2016. Antibiotics --When Less is More. Most Urgent Threats. Serious Threats

Risk Factors for Persistent MRSA Colonization in Children with Multiple Intensive Care Unit Admissions

Proceedings of the 19th American Academy of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics Biennial Symposium

Healthcare-associated infections surveillance report

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

2017 SURVEILLANCE OF SURGICAL SITES INFECTIONS FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Pneumonia considerations Galia Rahav Infectious diseases unit Sheba medical center

03/09/2014. Infection Prevention and Control A Foundation Course. Talk outline

Preventing Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Infections. For National Patient Safety Goal

Doxycycline staph aureus

Appropriate Management of Common Pediatric Infections. Blaise L. Congeni M.D. Akron Children s Hospital Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in Ghana

UCSF guideline for management of suspected hospital-acquired or ventilatoracquired pneumonia in adult patients

Antibiotic Resistance in the Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Settings: Strategies for Stewardship

Perichondritis: Source: UpToDate Ciprofloxacin 10 mg/kg/dose PO (max 500 mg/dose) BID Inpatient: Ceftazidime 50 mg/kg/dose q8 hours IV

Multi-drug resistant microorganisms

RISK FACTORS FOR PENICILLIN-RESISTANT STREPTOCOCCUS PNEUMONIAE ACQUISITION IN PATIENTS IN BANGKOK

Central Nervous System Infections

GUIDE TO INFECTION CONTROL IN THE HOSPITAL. Antibiotic Resistance

Skin and Soft Tissue Infections Emerging Therapies and 5 things to know

Einheit für pädiatrische Infektiologie Antibiotics - what, why, when and how?

American Journal of Infection Control

Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program 2018 SURVEILLANCE FOR HEALTHCARE ACQUIRED CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SHUNT ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority

PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS. Surname. Given name. Pacific Islander (non-maori) ADMISSION DETAILS

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Swabs as a Tool in Antimicrobial Stewardship

Burden of disease of antibiotic resistance The example of MRSA. Eva Melander Clinical Microbiology, Lund University Hospital

Antibiotic Stewardship in the LTC Setting

Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: How Do We Define them? How do We Stop Them?

GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA IN ADULTS

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

Epidemiology of early-onset bloodstream infection and implications for treatment

Curricular Components for Infectious Diseases EPA

Antimicrobial Stewardship/Statewide Antibiogram. Felicia Matthews Senior Consultant, Pharmacy Specialty BD MedMined Services

An Approach to Appropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in Outpatient and LTC Settings?

Implementing Antibiotic Stewardship in Rural and Critical Access Hospitals

New Antibiotics for MRSA

Healthcare-associated Infections Annual Report

Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-associated Infections in Europe

Treatment of Surgical Site Infection Meeting Quality Statement 6. Prof Peter Wilson University College London Hospitals

Antimicrobial resistance (EARS-Net)

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

11/10/2016. Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Disclosures. Educational Need/Practice Gap. Objectives. Case #1

DATA COLLECTION SECTION BY FRONTLINE TEAM. Patient Identifier/ Medical Record number (for facility use only)

Annual Report: Table 1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Results for 2,488 Isolates of S. pneumoniae Collected Nationally, 2005 MIC (µg/ml)

Development of Drugs for Skin Infections

MRSA What We Need to Know Sharon Pearce, CRNA, MSN Carolina Anesthesia Associates

Evolution of antibiotic resistance. October 10, 2005

Infectious Disease 101: Helping the Consultant Pharmacist with Stewardship Principles

Hospital Acquired Infections in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Hand washing/hand hygiene reduces the number of microorganisms on the hands and is the most important practice to prevent the spread of infection.

Antibiotic Resistances Profile in Iran, Clinical Implication and Prospect for Antibiotic Stewardship Jafar Soltani

MDRO in LTCF: Forming Networks to Control the Problem

Transcription:

Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Surveillance Report 2010 Oregon Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs) Office of Disease Prevention & Epidemiology Oregon Health Authority Updated: November 2011 Background The Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) program is a core component of the Emerging Infections Program (EIP) Network sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The purpose of the ABCs program is to determine the incidence and epidemiologic characteristics of invasive disease due to Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, group A streptococcus (GAS), group B streptococcus (GBS), Streptococcus pneumoniae, and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The entire EIP Network for invasive MRSA represents over 19 million persons in 10 surveillance areas around the United States. More information on the EIP/ABCs Network is found at: http://www.cdc.gov/abcs/index.html. In Oregon, the surveillance area for invasive MRSA comprises the tri county (Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington) Portland metropolitan area, with a 2010 estimated population of 1,644,536. More information on the Oregon ABCs program is found at: http://public.health.oregon.gov/diseasesconditions/communicabledisease/pages/abc.aspx. Methods An invasive MRSA infection is defined as the isolation of MRSA from a normally sterile body site in a tri county resident. Tri county hospital laboratories voluntarily submit all sterile site MRSA isolates to the Oregon State Public Health Laboratory (OSPHL). A subset is sent to CDC for further characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Additional cases are identified through regular laboratory record reviews. Health record reviews of each case allow standardized reports of demographic characteristics, clinical syndrome, underlying illnesses or conditions, healthcare associated risk factors, and illness outcome. Cases of invasive disease are classified into one of three epidemiologic classifications based on the presence or absence of established healthcare risk factors and time of culture collection in relation to hospital admission, as indicated in the medical record. Healthcare onset (HO ) MRSA infections are those in which the initial culture was collected >2 days after hospital admission. Source: Portland State University Population Research Center (http://www.pdx.edu/prc/) MRSA infection is the invasion of bacteria in the tissues of the host leading to clinical signs and symptoms of illness or infection whereas colonization refers to the presence of bacteria but without tissue damage and signs of illness or infection. Colonized patients are also known as asymptomatic carriers.

Healthcare associated, community onset (HACO ) MRSA infections are those in which the initial culture was collected 2 days after hospital admission or evaluation, and the medical chart indicates one or more of the following risk factors: o A history of hospitalization, surgery, dialysis, or residence in a long term care facility in the previous year, or o Presence of a central vascular catheter 2 calendar days prior to collection of initial culture. Community associated (CA ) MRSA infections are those in which none of the previously mentioned criteria are met. Additional technical information on surveillance methodology, including data elements collected, healthcare risk factors, clinical manifestations, and underlying diseases and conditions can be found at the CDC EIP/ABCs Network website listed above. Surveillance Results Descriptive Epidemiology In 2010, we identified 239 cases of invasive MRSA disease for an overall incidence of 14.5/100,000 persons (Figure 1). Of these, 36 (15%) cases had recurrent disease, defined as isolation of MRSA from a normally sterile site 30 or more days after any previous initial MRSA culture. Since the beginning of surveillance in 2004, when 405 cases were reported (26.6/100,000), the incidence of invasive MRSA disease has decreased 45 percent. The mean and median ages of cases reported in 2010 were 60 and 59 years, respectively (range: 8 95 years). Sixty one percent of all reported cases were male. Race was reported for 144 cases; of these, 82% were white, 13% were black, and 5% were of another race. The highest incidence of invasive MRSA disease occurred among residents of Multnomah county (20.3/100,000); followed by residents in Washington (10.3/100,000) and Clackamas (9.4/100,000) counties. Thirty two cases were fatal, for mortality and case fatality rates of 1.9/100,000 and 13%, respectively. The case fatality rate has decreased 12% since 2004. The mean and median ages of death due to invasive MRSA infection were 60 and 59 years, respectively, with a range of 8 to 95 years. Risk of death was associated with increasing age (p=0.0247). Among those who died, 59% were 65 and older, and 81% were 50 and older. There were two deaths among those younger than 35 years of age. One was a 31 year old with a history of injection drug use, presenting with endocarditis, septic shock, and septic emboli. The other was a 10 year old without any notable underlying conditions, presenting with septic shock. 2

Epidemiologic Classifications Of the 239 total cases reported, Figure 1: Incidence of Invasive MRSA Cases in Tri county Area 30 (13%) were HO (1.8/100,000); HO HACO CA Overall 134 (56%) were HACO 30.0 (8.1/100,000); and 75 (31%) were CA (4.6/100,000). Since 25.0 2004, the incidence of HO has 20.0 decreased 71 percent, that of HACO has decreased 44 percent 15.0 and that of CA has decreased 19 10.0 percent (Figure 1). HO cases have comprised a decreasing 5.0 proportion of all MRSA cases, 0.0 from 24 percent in 2004 to 13 percent in 2010 (test for trend, p<0.0001), while CA cases have comprised an increasing proportion of all MRSA cases, from 21 percent in 2004 to 31 percent in 2010 (p=0.0001). The proportion of HACO cases has not changed significantly over time. Incidence per 100,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Epidemiologic classification of cases as HO, HACO, or CA MRSA was associated with age (Figure 2). The mean and median ages for CA infections (53 and 54, respectively) were significantly lower than those seen for HACO (63 and 62, respectively) and for HO infections (62 and 64, respectively). Classification was not associated with sex or race. Incidence per 100,000 60.0 40.0 20.0 Figure 2: Incidence of Invasive MRSA by Infection Type and Age 2010 HO HACO CA Mortality was highest among HACO cases (0.97/100,000), followed by CA (0.55/100,000) and HO (0.43/100,000); case fatality was highest among HO (23%), followed by HACO and CA (13% each). 0.0 0 4 5 17 18 34 35 49 50 64 65 79 80+ 3

Clinical Manifestations The most common (reported in at least 10% of 2010 cases) clinical manifestations of invasive MRSA infections are displayed in Table 1. Since 2004, the proportion of each of these clinical syndromes has not changed significantly over time, with the exception of non skin abscesses. The proportion of abscess cases has increased significantly over time (p=0.0080). CA cases were more likely to manifest as an abscess from a normally sterile site (OR 3.2; CI 1.7, 6.2) than cases with healthcare associated risk factors (HO and HACO cases). Other syndromes were reported similarly across infection types. Table 1: Common Clinical Manifestations of Invasive MRSA Cases by Epidemiologic Classification, 2010 Clinical Manifestations HO n=30 HACO CA n=75 Total n=239 Bacteremia 22 (73) 117 (87) 55 (3) 194 (81) Abscess (not skin) 5 (17) 17 (13) 25 (33) 47 (20) Pneumonia* 9 (30) 17 (13) 12 (16) 38 (16) Osteomyelitis 1 (3) 21 (16) 10 (13) 32 (13) Cellulitis 2 (7) 12 (9) 12 (16) 26 (11) Septic shock 6 (20) 14 (10) 4 (5) 24 (10) None 1 (3) 3 (2) 2 (3) 6 (3) Some cases report more than 1 syndrome. * Only those cases of pneumonia with a sterile site isolate are included. Sputum or endotracheal aspirates are not considered sterile sites. Underlying Conditions Almost all (95%) invasive MRSA cases were in individuals reporting one or more underlying diseases or conditions (Table 2). Based on univariate analyses, cases with healthcare associated risk factors (including HO and HACO) were more likely to report renal failure (OR 4.4; CI 1.9, 10.2) and decubitus ulcer (OR 3.2; CI 1.1, 9.5), and less likely to report abscess/boils (OR 0.3; CI 0.2, 0.7), intravenous drug use (IVDU) (OR 0.3; CI 0.1, 0.8), and smoking (OR 0.4; CI 0.2, 0.7) than CA cases. After controlling for age, none of the underlying conditions were individually associated with fatal outcome. Table 2: Common Underlying Conditions Reported Among Invasive MRSA Cases by Epidemiologic Classification, 2010 Underlying Conditions HO n=30 HACO CA n=75 Total n=239 Diabetes 10 (33) 58 (43) 22 (29) 90 (38) Cardiovascular disease 12 (40) 45 (34) 9 (12) 66 (28) Smoking 4 (13) 28 (21) 29 (39) 61 (26) Chronic skin breakdown 7 (23) 40 (30) 13 (17) 60 (25) Chronic renal insufficiency 9 (30) 42 (31) 7 (9) 58 (24) Obesity 5 (17) 24 (18) 11 (15) 40 (17) 4

Underlying Conditions HO n=30 HACO CA n=75 Total n=239 Abscess/boil 2 (7) 16 (12) 20 (27) 38 (16) Immunosuppressive therapy 6 (20) 21 (16) 7 (9) 34 (14) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 4 (13) 19 (14) 7 (9) 30 (13) Solid organ malignancy 6 (20) 21 (16) 5 (7) 32 (13) Stroke/CVA 3 (10) 21 (16) 6 (8) 30 (13) Asthma 3 (10) 17 (13) 8 (11) 28 (12) Decubitus/pressure ulcer 1 (3) 24 (18) 4 (5) 29 (12) Intravenous drug use 0 (0) 13 (10) 15 (20) 28 (12) Peripheral vascular disease 4 (13) 17 (13) 3 (4) 24 (10) Dementia 0 (0) 16 (12) 3 (4) 19 (8) Alcohol abuse 2 (7) 4 (3) 8 (11) 14 (6) Cirrhosis 2 (7) 9 (7) 2 (3) 13 (5) None 3 (10) 3 (2) 5 (7) 11 (5) Some cases report more than 1 syndrome. Antibiotic Susceptibilities By definition, all MRSA isolates are resistant to β lactam antibiotics, including penicillin and methicillin. Additionally, among isolates tested, a proportion displayed intermediate/full resistance or decreased susceptibility to several commonly assayed antibiotics in 2010, including: erythromycin (92%, n=238), levofloxacin (72%, n=61), clindamycin (44%, n=237), tetracycline (7%, n=181), and trimethoprim sulfa (3%, Percentage 100 80 60 40 20 0 Figure 3: Percentage of Invasive MRSA Isolates with Decreased Susceptibility (Intermediate or Full Resistance) to Select Antibiotics Erythromycin Levofloxacin Clindamycin Tetracycline TMP SMX Rifampin Daptomycin 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 n=237). None of the tested isolates in 2010 were resistant to daptomycin, linezolid, rifampin, or vancomycin. Since 2004, the percentages of invasive MRSA isolates with decreased susceptibility to these select antibiotics have remained relatively stable (Figure 3). No isolates during this time period have displayed decreased susceptibility to linezolid or vancomycin. 5

In 2010, HO and HACO cases, combined, were almost three times more likely to display decreased susceptibility to clindamycin (95% CI 1.6, 5.2) than community associated cases (Figure 4). Other differences were not statistically significant or were unable to be tested due to insufficient sample size. Percentage 100 80 60 40 Figure 4: Percentage of Invasive MRSA Isolates with Decreased Susceptibility (Intermediate or Full Resistance) to Select Antibiotics by Infection Type, 2010 Erythromycin Levofloxacin Clindamycin Tetracycline TMP SMX Rifampin Daptomycin Expanded HACO Analysis The distribution of healthcare risk factors among HACO cases is shown in Table 3. HACO infections are those in which the initial MRSA culture was collected 2 days after hospital admission or evaluation, and the medical chart indicates a history of hospitalization, surgery, residence in a long term care facility, dialysis in the previous year, or the presence of a central vascular catheter 2 calendar days prior to collection of initial culture. Among HACO cases in 2010, 20 0 HO HACO CA Table 3: Distribution of Healthcare Risk Factors Among HACO Risk Factors 2010 2009 Hospitalization 2 125 (93) 121 (90) Surgery 2 86 (64) 76 (58) LTCF Residence 2 41 (31) 52 (39) Dialysis 2 20 (15) 24 (18) Central Venous Catheter 1 19 (14) 28 (21) 1 In place 2 calendar days prior to initial culture 2 Within year before date of initial culture 33 (25%) had one healthcare risk factor; 54 (40%) had two; 39 (29%) had three; 7 (5%) had four; 1 (1%) had five. Since 2004, we have identified 294 (14%) patients with invasive MRSA who underwent dialysis within the year before their initial culture date. Of these individuals, 64 percent were male, 85 percent were hospitalized, 14 percent had a fatal outcome, 87 percent were classified as having a HACO infection, and 63 percent of 123 cases with known PFGE pattern were considered to be of healthcare origin (i.e. USA100, USA200, USA500). The mean and median ages were both 61 years, respectively (range: 14 90 years). Beginning in 2009, our surveillance program began collecting information on current chronic dialysis. Of the 44 (9%) patients who underwent chronic dialysis at time of culture collection, all had hemodialysis treatment, with the exception of one patient who underwent peritoneal dialysis. Of the 43 hemodialysis patients, 48 percent had an AV fistula, 45 percent had a central vascular catheter, and the remaining had unknown access type. The definition of this variable changed in 2009. Old definition: Surgery within year before index culture date. New definition: Surgery within year before initial culture date. The definition of this variable changed in 2009. Old definition: Central vascular catheter in place at time of admission/evaluation. New definition: Central vascular catheter in place at any time in the 2 calendar days prior to initial culture. 6

Discussion Seven full years of surveillance have allowed for a better characterization of the epidemiology of invasive MRSA disease in the Portland tri county metropolitan area. Over this time, the incidence of invasive MRSA disease has decreased substantially, with the greatest decrease seen among HO cases. Results from 2010 are consistent with previous years, in that invasive MRSA disease including community associated cases manifests largely in those with an underlying condition or behavior that is related to their infection. Almost all cases in those with healthcare defining risk factors were in those with underlying chronic diseases, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, renal failure, etc., that require frequent encounters with the healthcare system or invasive medical procedures. Invasive MRSA cases generally increase with age and occur primarily among those 65 and older. The more frequent susceptibility of CA MRSA isolates to clindamycin is consistent with the fact that a greater proportion of these are USA300 PFGE type, which usually carries fewer resistance genes than healthcare associated PFGE types. Clindamycin is not generally used as primary therapy for invasive MRSA disease. Intermediate or full resistance to vancomycin has not been detected among invasive MRSA isolates in Oregon, based on accepted breakpoint minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. There are numerous reports in the medical literature of possible decreasing effectiveness of vancomycin due to small but significant increases in resistance of MRSA to this drug, reflected in slowly rising MIC values. However, since methods for determining MICs may vary between laboratories, and isolates are generally reported as either susceptible or not, the extent vancomycin MICs have been increasing over time among MRSA isolates in Oregon is unclear. Additional characterization of the MRSA isolates is required to answer this question. The use of molecular strain type information has demonstrated an increase in the traditional community associated USA300 strain among cases classified epidemiologically as healthcareassociated. This finding raises two possibilities: The frequency of transmission of USA300 strains within the healthcare setting could be increasing (an observation supported in recentlypublished literature); or cases may be misclassified as healthcare associated, due to the presence of the established risk factors, when colonization or infection was actually acquired in the community. 2,3 Although both factors likely play some role, further investigation will be needed to better understand the dynamics of MRSA transmission between healthcare and community settings. References 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Invasive Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections Among Dialysis Patients United States, 2005. MMWR 2007;56:09. Available via the Internet: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5609a3.htm. Accessed 4 Nov 2011. 2. Popovich KJ, Weinstein RA, Bota B. Are community associated Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains replacing traditional nosocomial MRSA strains? Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:787 94. 3. Boyce JM. Community associated Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a cause of healthcareassociated infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:795 8. 7