Somatic Cell Count as an Indicator of Subclinical Mastitis. Genetic Parameters and Correlations with Clinical Mastitis

Similar documents
Genetic parameters for pathogen specific clinical mastitis in Norwegian Red cows

Comparison of different methods to validate a dataset with producer-recorded health events

A retrospective study of selection against clinical mastitis in the Norwegian dairy cow population

Breeding for health using producer recorded data in Canadian Holsteins

Development of a Breeding Value for Mastitis Based on SCS-Results

Genetic Variability of Alternative Somatic Cell Count Traits and their Relationship with Clinical and Subclinical Mastitis

Genetic and Genomic Evaluation of Mastitis Resistance in Canada

Genetic Evaluation of Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

Statistical Indicators E-27 Breeding Value Udder Health

Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation a tool for practical breeding with red breeds

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Genetic Relationships between Milk Yield, Somatic Cell Count, Mastitis, Milkability and Leakage in Finnish Dairy Cattle Population

A New Index for Mastitis Resistance

, Pamela L. Ruegg

Management traits. Teagasc, Moorepark, Ireland 2 ICBF

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

Section 2: KPI Results for the year ending 31/08/2017

New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program Fact Sheet Udder Health Herd Goals

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

Genetic Relationship between Clinical Mastitis and Several Traits of Interest in Spanish Holstein Dairy Cattle

Last 2-3 months of lactation

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Herd Navigator and mastitis management

Index for Mastitis Resistance and Use of BHBA for Evaluation of Health Traits in Canadian Holsteins

Environmental and genetic effects on claw disorders in Finnish dairy cattle

Genetics, a tool to prevent mastitis in dairy cows

Simultaneous genetic evaluation of simulated mastitis susceptibility and recovery ability using a bivariate threshold sire model

Assessment of the Impact of Somatic Cell Count on Functional Longevity in Holstein and Jersey Cattle Using Survival Analysis Methodology

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

Genetic Achievements of Claw Health by Breeding

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

Milking behaviour in dairy cows naturally infected with clinical mastitis

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG WEIGHTS AND CALVING PERFORMANCE OF HEIFERS IN A HERD OF UNSELECTED CATTLE

Bivariate threshold models for genetic evaluation of susceptibility to and ability to recover from mastitis in Danish Holstein cows

The mastitis situation in Canada where do you stand?

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

Summary. Table 1. Estimated infection prevalence and losses in milk production associated with elevated bulk tank somatic cell counts.

HOW CAN TRACEABILITY SYSTEMS INFLUENCE MODERN ANIMAL BREEDING AND FARM MANAGEMENT?

Genetic parameters of number of piglets nursed

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. August 1, Zoetis Genetics 333 Portage Street Kalamazoo, MI KEY POINTS

GENETIC SELECTION FOR MILK QUALITY WHERE ARE WE? David Erf Dairy Technical Services Geneticist Zoetis

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

Norwegian mastitis control programme

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

The Bimeda Guide to Selective Dry Cow Therapy

VIKRANK Customized index

Registration system in Scandinavian countries - Focus on health and fertility traits. Red Holstein Chairman Karoline Holst

J. Dairy Sci. 94 : doi: /jds American Dairy Science Association, 2011.

Heritability of Intramammary Infections at First

1. Introduction. (Received 18 June 2015; received in revised form 1 August 2015; accepted 12 August 2015)

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in Finnish dairy cows: changes during recent decades and impact of cow and herd factors

GENETIC IMPROVEMENT OF UDDER HEALTH. J.C.M. Dekkers1,2, P.J. Boettcher1, and B.A. Mallard3

Study of the relationship between certain environment and genetic factors with the different forms of mastitis by cows for milk

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

GENETICS AND BREEDING

Evaluation of a new qpcr test to specify reasons behind total bacterial count in bulk tank milk

Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation

Genetic and Genomic Evaluation of Claw Health Traits in Spanish Dairy Cattle N. Charfeddine 1, I. Yánez 2 & M. A. Pérez-Cabal 2

Key words: mastitis, dairy, fertility, animal reproduction

* Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Animal Welfare Program,

OUTSTANDING TEAM OF NORWEGIAN RED SIRES NOW AVAILABLE FROM GENETICS AUSTRALIA. Writes John Harle

Mastitis cows and immunization

New French genetic evaluations of fertility and productive life of beef cows

University of Missouri Extension Using the California Mastitis Test

Advanced Interherd Course

Low Somatic Cell Count: a Risk Factor for Subsequent Clinical Mastitis in a Dairy Herd

Caused by microorganisms (usually bacteria) that invade the udder, multiply, and produce toxins that are harmful to the mammary gland

Evaluation of the use of dry cow antibiotics in low somatic cell count cows

Veterinaria.com.pt 2009; Vol. 1 Nº 1: e13 (publicação inicial em Julho de 2008) Disponível em

Mastitis Reports in Dairy Comp 305

RISKS, REALITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH MASTITIS TREATMENTS

Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation for Docility in Irish Suckler Beef Cattle

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

Proper Dry-Off Procedures to Prevent New Infections and Cure Existing Cases of Mastitis. Stephen C. Nickerson University of Georgia

Guideline on the conduct of efficacy studies for intramammary products for use in cattle

AUTOMATIC MILKING SYSTEMS AND MASTITIS

Genetic Evaluation of Susceptibility toand Recoverability from Mastitis in Dairy Cows

A Partial Budget Model to Estimate Economic Benefits of Lactational Treatment of Subclinical Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis

ENVIRACOR J-5 aids in the control of clinical signs associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) mastitis

1/1/ K BEAT IT!

Updated guidelines for the recording, evaluation, and genetic improvement of udder health in dairy cattle

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Mastitis in ewes: towards development of a prevention and treatment plan

Actions and Outcomes of Wisconsin Dairy Farms Completing Milk Quality Teams

Incidence of subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy heifers in the first 100 days in lactation and associated risk factors

Controlling Highly Prevalent Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis from the Dairy Farm

Case Study: Dairy farm reaps benefits from milk analysis technology

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

Mastitis Reminders and Resources LAURA SIEGLE EXTENSION AGENT VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AMELIA COUNTY

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Transcription:

Somatic Cell Count as an Indicator of Subclinical Mastitis. Genetic Parameters and Correlations with Clinical Mastitis Morten Svendsen 1 and Bjørg Heringstad 1,2 1 GENO Breeding and A.I. Association, P.O Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway. 2 Dep. of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences. P.O Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway. Phone: +47 64965227 Fax: +47 64965101 E-mail: morten.svendsen at umb.no Phone: +47 64965117 Fax: +47 64965101 E-mail: bjorg.heringstad at umb.no Key words: Dairy cattle; somatic cell count; mastitis; binary trait; multivariate; sire model 1. Introduction Both clinical mastitis (CM) and soma-tic cell count (SCC) have complex biological background. Schukken et al. (1997) reviewed defence mechanisms against mastitis, such as mechanical prevention of microorganisms entering the udder; cellular innate immunity for immediate response to infection; and adaptive immunity involving antibody producing B-lymfocytes and T-lymfocytes. Bacteria causing intramammarian infection can be grouped in three major classes. Gramnegative bacteria like E.coli; S.aureus; and non-agalactiae streptococci (S.uberis and S.dysgalactiae), the last two groups being gram-positive. These bacteriaclasses differ with regard to prevalence through lactation, ability to cause clinical symptoms, defense mechanisms activated in the udder, and pattern in SCC response (de Haas et al., 2002; Schukken et al., 1997). Heringstad et al. (2004) analyzed CM by dividing each of the first 3 lactations into 4 periods, treating each period as a binary CM trait. Genetic correlations varying from.24 to.73 indicate that CM should not be regarded as the same trait in different parts of lactation or in different lactations. The Norwegian mastitis index has now been expanded to include both early and late lactation traits in 3 lactations (Svendsen and Heringstad, 2006). SCC has so far not been used in genetic evaluation of mastitis in Norway. In the Norwegian Dairy Herd Recording System milk yield is recorded every month, but samples for analysis of milk constituents and SCC are only mandatory every second month. With such long intervals between testdays, SCC can t be expected to reflect well the frequency of clinical mastitis. Especially not short term infections. Subclinical and chronic infections however, could cause longterm elevated SCC (de Haas et al., 2002) covering several testdays. Our objective was to express sub-clinical and chronic mastitis as a binary trait based on prolonged elevated SCC and estimate genetic parameters and correlation to clinical mastitis for such trait. 2. Material and Methods Data were from the Norwegian Dairy Herd Recording System and included mastitis information and testday SCC for the first 3 lactations of cows with first calving from 1988 to 1997 in herd by year classes of at least five. Clinical mastitis (CMi) was defined as a binary trait within each of seven intervals (i=1,..,7) such that first lactation was divided in 3 intervals: (-15 to 30), (31 to 120), and (121 to 305), whereas second and third lactations were divided in 2 intervals: (-15 to 30) and (31 to 305) days postpartum. Number of observations and proportion of treated cows for each trait can be found in Svendsen and Heringstad (2006). Subclinical or chronical mastitis (SM) was defined as a binary trait within each lactation. 12

If SCC on 2 testdays 2 mo apart both were above a fixed threshold the binary variable was defined as 1, 0 otherwise. In herds with monthly milk samples, three consecutive testday SCC had to be above the threshold. Four thresholds were investigated, 50,000, 100,000, 150,000, and 200,000 cells/ml. Only testdays between 30 and 270 days in milk were considered. Numbers of observations were 566,000, 392,000 and 241,000 in first, second and third lactation, respectively. The proportions of cows with SM defined by the 4 SCC thresholds are given in Table 1. The gaussian linear sire model used for analysis had fixed effects of age at calving in months and year by month of calving, and random effects of herd by year, sire, and residual. Acceptable age at calving was 21 to 31 mo at first calving; 32 to 47 mo at second calving; and 43 to 61 mo at third calving. Pedigrees of sires were traced at least 3 generations. Variance components were estimated from bivariate models using the dmuai program (Madsen and Jensen, 2005). Expected genetic progress in each binary trait from progeny testing of bulls was calculated using selection index theory (Lin, 1978). Assumed information sources and datastructure were as in Svendsen and Heringstad (2006). Bivariate estimates from SCC-threshold of 100,000 cells/ml were combined with CM estimates into 10-variate positive semidefinite covariance matrices by using the itsumcov program (Henshall and Meyer, 2002). 3. Results and Discussion The distribution of testday SCC across first lactation is depicted in Figure 1. During the first month there were many high SCC records, but the situation improved after peak lactation before getting worse in the last trimester. Fifteen to twenty percent of the samples had SCC below 20,000 cells/ml and about half of the samples were below 50,000 cells/ml. Percentile 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 60 5 40 3 20 00 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 160 Days in milk Figure 1. Testday SCC (10 3 cells/ml) in first lactations since 2001. Percentiles calculated for 10 days periods throughout the lactation. The proportions of affected cows were higher for SM (Table 1) than for CM (Svendsen and Heringstad, 2006) which is advantageous when analyzing a binary trait with a Gaussian linear model. For thresholds of 50,000 and 100,000 cells/ml the heritability estimates were between.076 and.086 (Table 1) which were close to those found for liability of CM in a Bayesian threshold model (Heringstad et al., 2004). SM defined by 200,000 cells/ml showed higher heritabilities than CM traits (Svendsen and Heringstad, 2006) with similar proportions affected cows. Within lactations, SM traits were automatically correlated as the lower SCC threshold included all affected cows of the higher SCC threshold. The genetic correlations between the most different traits defined by 50,000 and 200,000 cells/ml were between.89 and.92. Bull ranking will there-fore not be severely affected by choice of SCC threshold. Herd by year correlations were between.74 and.79, and the residual correlations ranged from.31 to.37. 1 70 13

Table 1. Subclinical mastitis defined by SCC threshold in first, second, and third lactation. Proportion of affected cows (p), variance ratios of herd by year (c 2 ) and sire times four (h 2 ) in %. SCC threshold p c 2 h 2 10 3 cells/ml 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 50 45.5 62.5 69.8 5.9 7.0 7.3 8.6 8.2 7.6 100 25.2 37.1 43.4 4.2 5.6 6.3 7.8 7.7 7.7 150 16.5 25.1 29.6 3.4 4.9 5.6 5.9 5.9 6.1 200 11.6 18.1 21.7 2.9 4.2 4.8 4.5 4.9 5.1 Table 2. Residual correlation (r e ), herd by year correlation (r c ) and genetic correlation (r g ) between subclinical mastitis, defined by the same SCC threshold across lactations. SCC threshold 10 3 cells/ml 1-2 r e 2-3 1-3 1-2 r c 2-3 1-3 1-2 r g 2-3 1-3 50.28.32.18.80.95.77.90.99.83 100.28.33.19.75.91.73.94.98.87 150.25.31.17.71.92.69.96.98.90 200.23.29.15.71.92.70.96.98.91 For SM defined by the same SCC threshold across lactations (Table 2), second and third lactation were slightly higher correlated than first to second and first to third lactation. The genetic correlations between SM traits varied between.83 and.99 and were slightly higher than what was found between CM traits by Svendsen and Heringstad (2006). Correlations between SM and CM in the same lactation are given in Table 3. Resid-ual correlations were all close to zero. Herd by year correlations were slightly negative with CM in early lactation. In herds with high frequency of early CM, carry over effects of treatments, dried up quarters and early culling may reduce high SCC later in lactation. Genetic correlations tended to be higher when the SCC threshold defining SM was higher (Table 3). The average result for 200,000 cells/ml was similar to the estimated genetic correlation between lactation SCC and CM of 0.53 in a recent Norwegian study (Ødegård et al., 2004). The correlations were stronger to CM in late lactation (CM2, CM3, CM5 and CM7) than to CM in early lactation. This was consistent over all SCC thresholds and lactations. This may be because mastitis caused by gram-positive bacteria are more frequent in late lactation and these bacteria often cause chronic infections with high SCC. Adaptive immunity plays a major role to fight these infections, whereas innate immunity and mechanical defense are most important factors to prevent E.coli infections from reaching a clinical stage in early lactation (Schukken et al., 1997). If these mechanisms show independent inheritance, low genetic correlation is to be expected. The new Norwegian mastitis index (Svendsen and Heringstad, 2006) is expected to give genetic progress for SM (Table 4) almost at the same rate as for CM in late lactation. However, including the SM traits (New+SM in Table 4) does not improve the CM traits and does only marginaly improve the SM traits themselves. 14

Table 3. Residual correlations (r e ), herd by year correlations (r c ), and genetic correlations (r g ) between subclinical mastitis defined by SCC thresholds (SM) and clinical mastitis traits (CMi) in the same lactation. Threshold 10 3 cells/ml CM1 CM2 CM3 SM2 CM4 SM2 CM5 SM3 CM6 SM3 CM7 r g 50.26.49.40.31.41.32.38 100.29.52.45.42.50.39.47 150.33.58.51.46.57.38.57 200.35.61.56.47.62.42.61 r c 50 -.21.02 -.02 -.09.00 -.10.04 100 -.19.03.01 -.13.02 -.07.02 150 -.16.01.03 -.14.01 -.08.01 200 -.14.02.04 -.15 -.01 -.12.00 r e 50 -.04.03.08 -.02.06 -.02.05 100 -.03.04.09 -.01.09 -.01.08 150 -.02.05.10.00.10.01.09 200 -.01.05.11.01.10.02.10 Table 4. Expected genetic gain in CM and SM traits from selection based on the new mastitis index (1/3 CM1 + 1/3 CM2 + 1/3 CM3) with different sources of information, relative to expected gain of 100 in the old mastitis index (0.7 CM1 + 0.3 CM2). Traits providing information are underlined. Mastitis index CM1 CM2 CM3 CM4 CM5 CM6 CM7 SM2 SM3 Old 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 New 93.9 120.4 129.9 100.0 128.6 100.0 122.3 119.7 121.3 123.4 New +SM 93.9 120.4 129.9 100.0 128.6 100.0 122.3 121.9 123.1 126.0 New -CM 20.4 56.3 57.4 34.4 65.7 38.0 51.4 202.1 202.8 221.4 Because of few SCC testdays, the SM traits were constructed at the end of lactation. Therefore no records from own daughters would be available at the time of first evaluation. In a situation where only SM is available (New CM in Table 4), the rate of improvement would double for SM, but only half the progress in late lactation CM and a third in early lactation CM would be achieved. 4. Conclusions Choice of SCC-threshold defining SM will not severly affect bull ranking. Genetic correlations between SM in different lactations were high. Genetic correlations between SM and CM were stronger with higher SCC thresholds defining SM and with CM in late lactation. Including information from SM in the mastitis index will only yield a marginal improvement. 5. Acknowledgement The Norwegian Dairy Herd Recording System and the Norwegian Cattle Health Ser-vice are acknowledged for providing access to data. Dr. Erling Sehested and Dr. Astrid Karlsen are acknowledged for preparing the testday SCC data. 15

6. References de Haas, Y., Barkema, H.W. & Veerkamp, R.F. 2002. The effect of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on the lactation curve for somatic cell count. J. Dairy Sci. 85, 1314-1323. Henshall, J.M. & Meyer, K. 2002. PDMATRIX Programs to make matrices positive definite. In Proceedings of the 7 th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Communication No. 28-12. Heringstad, B., Chang, Y.M., Gianola, D. & Klemetsdal, G. 2004. Multivariate threshold model analysis of clinical mastitis in multiparous Norwegian Dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 87, 3038-3046. Lin, C.Y. 1978. Index selection for genetic improvement of quantitative characters. Theor. Appl. Genet. 52, 49-56. Madsen, P. & Jensen, J. 2005. A user s guide to DMU - A package for analyzing multivariate mixed models. Version 6, release 4.5. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, Denmark, 25 pp. Ødegård, J., Heringstad, B. & Klemetsdal, G. 2004. Short communication: Bivariate genetic analysis of clinical mastitis and somatic cell count in Norwegian Dairy Cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 87, 3515-3517. Schukken, Y.H., Lam, T.J.G.M. & Barkema, H.W. 1997. Biological basis for selection on udder health traits. Interbull Bulletin 15, 27-33. Svendsen, M. & Heringstad, B. 2006. New genetic evaluation for clinical mastitis in multiparous Norwegian Red cows. Proceedings Interbull Open Meeting, June 4-6, 2006, Kuopio, Finland. Interbull Bulletin 35, 8-11. 16