Title. Author(s)Bayoumi, Mohamed A.; Amer, Ibrahim H.; Mansour, Moha. CitationJapanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 64(Suppleme. Issue Date

Similar documents
Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

Milk Quality Management Protocol: Fresh Cows

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 2, 2017,

Prototheca Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Understanding the Basics of Mastitis

Milk quality & mastitis - troubleshooting, control program

Detection of Mastitis

Minna Koivula & Esa Mäntysaari, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Jokioinen, Finland

Lactation. Macroscopic Anatomy of the Mammary Gland. Anatomy AS 1124

Strep. ag.-infected Dairy Cows

Caused by microorganisms (usually bacteria) that invade the udder, multiply, and produce toxins that are harmful to the mammary gland

Somatic Cell Count: A Biomarker for Early Diagnosis and Therapeutic Evaluation in Bovine Mastitis

Mastitis MANAGING SOMATIC CELLS COUNTS IN. Somatic Cell Count Are Affected by. Somatic Cells are NOT Affected by:

ENVIRACOR J-5 aids in the control of clinical signs associated with Escherichia coli (E. coli) mastitis

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

AUTOMATIC MILKING SYSTEMS AND MASTITIS

Presented at Central Veterinary Conference, Kansas City, MO, August 2013; Copyright 2013, P.L Ruegg, all rights reserved

Influence of Experimentally- induced clinical mastitis on Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cattle

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

Milk Quality Evaluation Tools for Dairy Farmers

LOOKING FOR PROFITS IN MILK QUALITY

Options for Handling Mastitis during Lactation in Modern Dairy Farms

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Veterinaria.com.pt 2009; Vol. 1 Nº 1: e13 (publicação inicial em Julho de 2008) Disponível em

Guideline on the conduct of efficacy studies for intramammary products for use in cattle

TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING

, Pamela L. Ruegg

CLINICAL MASTITIS PERCEPTIONS OF KANSAS DAIRY PRODUCERS. J.R. Roberson 1

STUDY ON CLINICAL MASTITIS IN BUFFALOES CAUSED STAPHYLOCOCCAL SPECIES

Controlling Contagious Mastitis

Premiums, Production and Pails of Discarded Milk How Much Money Does Mastitis Cost You? Pamela Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

1. Introduction. (Received 18 June 2015; received in revised form 1 August 2015; accepted 12 August 2015)

Subclinical mastitis in small ruminants: prevalence, comparative aspects and prevention

Dairy/Milk Testing Report Detecting Elevated Levels of Bacteria in Milk-On-Site Direct- From-The-Cow Within Minutes as Indicator of Mastitis

Herd Navigator and mastitis management

MASTITIS. Therefore, mastitis is an inflammation of the mammary gland.

2012 Indiana Regional Dairy Meetings. Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine Dr. Jon Townsend Dairy Production Medicine

Mastitis in ewes: towards development of a prevention and treatment plan

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

MASTITIS CASE MANAGEMENT

The organism Infection process Tissue reaction SCC response Prevention Treatment

How to Decrease the Use of Antibiotics in Udder Health Management

Transition cows have decreased immune function. The transition period. Inflammation, Immune Function, and the Transition Cow.

Validation of the PathoProof TM Mastitis PCR Assay for Bacterial Identification from Milk Recording Samples

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences ISSN

Outline MILK QUALITY AND MASTITIS TREATMENTS ON ORGANIC 2/6/12

A New Index for Mastitis Resistance

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

F-MC-2: Dealing with Streptococcus agalactiae Mastitis

Low Somatic Cell Count: a Risk Factor for Subsequent Clinical Mastitis in a Dairy Herd

Using DHIA and bacteriology to investigate herd milk quality problems.

April Boll Iowa State University. Leo L. Timms Iowa State University. Recommended Citation

New Model. Digital Mastitis Detector. Reduce of risk at early stage

Quality Milk on Pasture Based Dairy Farms. Scott E. Poock, DVM University of Missouri Clinical Assistant Professor DABVP Beef and Dairy Cattle

DeLaval Cell Counter ICC User Strategies Guide

Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation

Advanced Interherd Course

Mastitis cows and immunization

Mastitis Prevention and Cure Rates in Heifers Treated with Spectramast Dry Cow Therapy and/or Orbeseal Dry Cow Teat Sealant

Field Efficacy of J-VAC Vaccines in the Prevention of Clinical Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

MASTITIS DNA SCREENING

29/11/2017. Best Milking Practices. Greg Strait- Fulton County Extension Amber Yutzy- Huntingdon County Extension

Last 2-3 months of lactation

Management Practices and Intramammary Infections: New Ideas for an Old Problem

Isolation and identification of major causing bacteria from bovinemastitis R. Lakshmi 1 and K.K. Jayavardhanan 2

Somatic Cell Count as an Indicator of Subclinical Mastitis. Genetic Parameters and Correlations with Clinical Mastitis

Prevention of clinical and subclinical mastitis

Interpretation of results from milk samples tested for mastitis bacteria with Mastit 4 qpcr test from DNA Diagnostic

Mastitis in Dairy Goats 1

Genetic parameters for pathogen specific clinical mastitis in Norwegian Red cows

Mycotoxins, Mastitis and Milk

On-Farm Antibiotic Testing

Mastitis Management and SCC Control in Once a Day Herds. Don Crowley- Teagasc

EUROPEAN MASTITIS PANEL CALLS FOR APPLICATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND TOOLS FOR PRACTICE

MSU Extension Publication Archive

Subclinical mastitis assessed by deviations in milk yield and electrical resistance

Interpretation and Use of Laboratory Culture Results and the Characteristics of Various Mastitis Pathogens

Differential Somatic Cell Count with the Fossomatic 7 DC - a novel parameter

Genetic and Genomic Evaluation of Mastitis Resistance in Canada

Evaluation of Regular Teat Sanitization Control Measures for Prevention of Sub Clinical Mastitis in Cattle

Use of a novel adjuvant to enhance the antibody response to vaccination against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy heifers.

LOCAL TOLERANCE OF INTRAMAMMARY PREPARATIONS IN COWS

Proper Dry-Off Procedures to Prevent New Infections and Cure Existing Cases of Mastitis. Stephen C. Nickerson University of Georgia

Lactoferrin Concentrations in Milk from Normal and Subclinical Mastitic Cows

Case Study: Dairy farm reaps benefits from milk analysis technology

Evaluation of intervention strategies for subclinical and clinical mastitis

Mastitis in non-bovine dairy species, companion animals and breastfeeding mothers. Chris Knight

Milking behaviour in dairy cows naturally infected with clinical mastitis

Efficacy of a composite formulation (masticure ) as an adjunct therapy in the treatment of mastitis in bovines

Comparison of different methods to validate a dataset with producer-recorded health events

Practical Strategies for Treating Mastitis Pamela L. Ruegg, DVM, MPVM University of Wisconsin, Madison

Mastitis in Dairy. Cattle. Oregon State System of Higher Education Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College JOHN 0.

Responsible Use of Antimicrobials in Dry Cow Strategies

The use of animal activity data and milk components as indicators of clinical mastitis. Andrea Renee Tholen

Best practice guide for on-farm mastitis control

Summary. Table 1. Estimated infection prevalence and losses in milk production associated with elevated bulk tank somatic cell counts.

New York State Cattle Health Assurance Program Fact Sheet Udder Health Herd Goals

8. MILK Udder health and milk quality is important to farm productivity and profitability. Every farm stands to gain from less mastitis.

Transcription:

Title Comparative evaluation of Interleukin-6, somatic cel subclinical mastitis in dairy Buffaloes Author(s)Bayoumi, Mohamed A.; Amer, Ibrahim H.; Mansour, Moha CitationJapanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 64(Suppleme Issue Date 2016-04 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/62011 Type bulletin (article) File Information p.s155-160 Mohammed A. Bayoumi.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Aca

Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research 64(Supplement 2): S155-160, 2016 Comparative evaluation of Interleukin-6, somatic cell count and electrical conductivity as predictive tools for subclinical mastitis in dairy Buffaloes Mohamed A. Bayoumi *), Ibrahim H. Amer, Mohamed A. Mansour and Sara A. Handousa Food Control Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt. *Corresponding author Email: mbayoumi@zu.edu.eg Abstract Due to the economic and public health importance of mastitis, the present study was designed to evaluate the use of new sensitive subclinical mastitis detection system in dairy buffaloes in comparison to well-established used methods. The new method involved the specific quantification of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in buffaloes milk using ELISA specific for bovine IL-6. 36 out of 50 buffaloes milk samples were found to be subclinicaly mastitic with a mean interleukin-6 value of 51.3±4.9 ng/ml. IL-6 determination showed great superiority and sensitivity for detection of subclinical mastitis in comparison to somatic cell count and electrical conductivity. Milk IL-6 determination comprises a valuable candidate for prediction of subclinical mastitis in dairy buffaloes. Key Word: Buffaloes milk, interleukin-6, subclinical mastitis, somatic cell count. Introduction Mastitis is an inflammatory condition of the udder caused mainly by invasion of a mastitisassociated pathogen 23). Mastitis is fairly the main costly disease affecting dairy cattle, due to its frequent recurrence in addition to constituting a potential health risk for other cows. Moreover, mastitis constitutes a major source of economic losses for dairy industry due to its detrimental effects on both milk quality and yield. In turn, it lowers the quality of most manufactured milk products 20). Furthermore, mastitis additionally worsens the economic losses via extra costs of treatments 6). Milk antibiotics residues constitute other public health concerns that arise due to extensive use of mastitis therapeutics. Thus, the cruciality of early detection of mastitis cases can be easily inferred from the above-mentioned problems. Detection of both types of mastitis, clinical and subclinical, is of great importance to maintain the dairy herd at best production capacity. Early detection of subclinical mastitis would surely help in limiting associated cost and bad prognosis of mastitis cases. Several diagnostic methods are being used to detect subclinical mastitis through milk quality, mammary gland status and detection of causative agents of mastitis. Nowadays, somatic cell count (SCC), in-line electrical conductivity (EC) sensors, and California mastitis test are being widely used 12). Recently, inflammatory indicators as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factors-α were proved to be one of the reliable techniques for the early detection of subclinical mastitis in cows 29). Whereas cows represent the largest sector of milk

S156 production worldwide, those aforementioned tests had been developed mainly for detection of mastitis in dairy cows. However, at certain countries like India, Egypt, Italy, Pakistan and China, dairy buffaloes herds represent a large segment of milk production 5). Similar to cows, mastitis is also representing an eminent economic-costing disease to dairy buffaloes 4). In the view of the unavailability of specific detection methods for subclinical mastitis in dairy Buffaloes, this study was designed to evaluate a newly developed method that allows the specific detection of IL-6 in buffalo milk samples for detection of subclinical mastitis. This was accomplished by using ELISA specific for bovine IL-6 to quantify the IL-6 in whey of raw dairy buffalo milk and to compare the new test s result with some established methods for detection of subclinical mastitis. Materials and methods Samples: Fifty raw buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) quarter s milk samples were collected from many buffaloes dairy farms and from individual owners at different regions of Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. Samples were collected in 50 ml screw capped sterilized bottles. All possible precautions were taken to avoid external contamination at the time of samples collection and during processing. Buffalo-cows showed any clinical sign of mastitis (udder or teat swelling, redness, pain, hotness and/ or curdled milk) was excluded from this study. Routine subclinical mastitis detection tests:milk samples were initially warmed to 35 C for 5 minutes and their somatic cell contents were counted automatically using Somatic cell counter (DeLaval cell counter). While for electrical conductivity, milk samples were cooled to 18 C and measurement was done using LactoscanLA TM (Milkotronic). Results were expressed as millisimens/cm (ms/cm). Interleukin-6 determination: IL-6 was determined in milk samples using IL-6 ELISA Reagent Kit, Bovine (Thermo Scientific). Briefly, milk samples were centrifuged (2500 RCF for 20 min at 4 C and the cell-free aqueous whey fractions were collected as described by Nakajima et al. 16). Whey samples were then frozen at-30 C until use. A sandwich ELISA using bovine antibodies specific for IL-6 was used to determine the concentrations of IL-6 in the whey samples following the manufacturer protocol. Statistical analysis: Presented data are the means ± SEM of three independent trails. The statistical significance of differences in IL-6 concentrations in the whey samples was determined by Student s t-test and one-way ANOVA. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted between SCC, EC and IL-6 at a probability level of p <0.05. Results and Discussion Many negative consequences are associated with mastitis. For instance, milk production losses and quality impairment, labor and veterinary expenses 25,28). In addition, various mastitis milkoriginated pathogens may find their way to persist at dairy environment, which will represent an imminent health threat 19). Thus, detection systems for subclinical mastitis should be developed and incorporated in milking lines to facilitate early intervention. In addition, an effective subclinical mastitis detection system should be able to combine the acceptable sensitivity and accuracy. Currently, many methods are available for detection of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. In contrast, approved detection systems of subclinical mastitis in dairy buffalo are much was less in comparison to cows. In this study, we aimed to assess new testing technique and comparing its result against well-established method.

Mohamed A. Bayoumi et al. S157 Table (1): Statistical analytical results of SCC, EC and IL-6 of examined samples. SCC EC IL-6 Statistical Normal Mastitic parameter ( 2.0 10 5 (>2.0 10 5 Normal Mastitic Normal ( ( 5 ms/cm) (>5 ms/cm) 3.6 ng/ml) * Mastitic(> 3.6 ng/ml) * /ml.) /ml.) No. (%) 19(38) 31(62) 25(50) 25(50) 14(28) 36(72) 2.9 10 Mean ±SEM 4 1.6 10 7 ±0.4 10 4 ±0.08 10 7 3.92±0.19 7.65±0.45 2.5 ± 0.3 51.3 ± 4.9 Min. 3.8 10 3 7.1 10 5 3.56 5.97 1.92 8.5 Max. 8.7 10 4 1.5 10 8 4.83 9.12 3.44 99.5 * According to Sakemi et al., 2011. Initially, the competency of using common bovine reagents in studying IL-6 in both buffalo and cattle species was proved previously (Premraj et al. 21) noticed a great similarity between IL-6 gene of both cow and buffalo species). Accordingly, commercial bovine IL-6 ELISA kit was used in this study. According to Sakemi et al. 24), a level of 3.6 ng/ml was used to be the threshold to discriminate mastitic from normal cases. Data presented in table (1) showed that 72% of examined samples were found to be mastitic according to IL-6 determination (with a mean value of 51.3 ± 4.9 ng/ ml). Intramammary infections induce different alterations in milk composition. Rather than chemical composition, inflammatory proteins like interleukins and acute phase proteins are significantly increased 2). Sakemi et al. 24) experimentally established that inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 are immediately associated with inflamed mammary glands at the onset of mastitis. Besides, IL-6 concentrations positively correlate with the severity of inflammation. In another report, Nayan et al. 17) reported that in subclinical mastitis, IL-1β and IL-6 expression was higher compared to control samples. However, higher expression of IL-1β and IL-6 was evident in clinical samples compared to sub-clinical samples. While according to other established methods for detection of subclinical mastitis, 50 and 56 % of samples were found positive according to EC and SCC. These figures of values evince the significant sensitivity of IL-6 determination in the detection of subclinical mastitis rather than SCC and EC. Furthermore, the detection of IL-6 in milk indicated subclinical mastitis earlier than the detection of elevated SCC did. Thus, the detection of IL-6 in milk could be a future prediction marker for subclinical mastitis. Regarding SCC, it was found that the mean SCC of examined buffaloes milk samples was 2.9 10 4 in case of normal milk samples, while in case of mastitis positive samples, the mean value was 1.6 10 7 ±0.08 10 7 (Table 1). Milk SCC is now considered as a sensitive monitoring technique for udder health and milk quality in dairy buffaloes 26). Somatic cells consist typically of neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes 11). During the early onset of mastitis, SCC increased steadily due to the high flow of neutrophils into milk 27). Jones 10) reported an obvious correlation between SCC and probability of pathogens contamination of raw milk. Moreover, elevated SCC may demonstrate the unhygienic conditions under which raw milk is produced. In addition to the indicatory aspect of elevated SCC, it is also rendering the suitability of raw milk for subsequent dairy products manufacture. Milk from normal uninfected quarters generally contains below 200,000 somatic cells/ml. An elevation of SCC to 300,000 and above is an indication of inflammation in the udder. Concerning EC, Data present in table (1) showed that the minimum EC % was 5.97; the

S158 maximum was 9.12 with a mean value of 7.65±0.45 ms/cm. Nearly similar findings were reported by El-barawy and Ali 3 ). Higher findings were reported by Mansell and Seguya 13). The changes in the EC of milk from infected quarter may depend on the specific pathogen causing subclinical mastitis. Conductivity increased in cows subclinically infected with Staphylococcus aureus but it was not detectably increased in intramammary infections caused by Streptococcus uberis 14). bacteriological and cytological tests 15,18), while others consider this method to be insufficiently sensitive 7,22). Further analysis of normal samples according to SCC and EC using IL-6 revealed that varying numbers among them were mastitic (above 3.6 ng/ml IL-6) (Figure 1). The mean level of IL-6 of mastitic samples according to IL-6 was 68.2 ng/ ml among SCC normal buffalo milk samples, while it was 64.7 among EC normal samples. Table (2): Correlation coefficients between IL-6 and SCC and EC of examined buffalo s milk samples. IL-6 SCC EC IL-6 1 0.917 * 0.656 SCC 0.917 * 1 0.842 EC 0.656 0.842 1 *: Significant (P<0.05). Figure (1): Distribution of examined samples according to IL-6 standard value among SCC and EC normal samples. Pearson s correlations between IL-6 and SCC and EC of buffalo s milk samples are illustrated in table 2. Results of the crosstabulation table showed that subclinical mastitis prediction accuracy based on IL-6 concentration was almost equal or superior to subclinical mastitis prediction accuracy based on SCC and significantly superior to that of EC. This certainly will have a great concerns about the credibility of using EC in detection of subclinical mastitis. EC of milk is controlled by sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chlorine, and other ions 1,8). During mastitis, changes occur in these ions concentration due to increased permeability of blood capillaries and impaired active transport system. However, data on the diagnostic value of this method is contradictory. According to some researchers 7,9), EC of healthy cow milk is 4.0-5.5 ms/cm. When EC increases to 6.0 ms/cm or more, pathological processes in the udder tissue may be suspected. Some authors point to a good correlation between EC and Conclusion From the above-mentioned results, the detection of IL-6 in buffaloes milk could be a future prediction marker for subclinical mastitis in buffaloes. IL-6 detection in milk showed great sensitivity and superiority in comparison to well established SCC and EC. Further conformational studies are required for different buffaloes breeds to ensure test applicability for all breeds.

Mohamed A. Bayoumi et al. S159 References 1) Barth, k. and Worstorff, H. 2000. Influence of different milking intervals on electrical conductivity before alveolar milk ejection in cows. Milchwissensch, 55: 363-365. 2) Eckersall, P. D., Young, F. J. and McComb, C., Hogarth, C. J., Safi, S., Weber, A., McDonald, T., Nolan, A. M. and Fitzpatrick, J. L. 2001. Acute phase proteins in serum and milk from dairy cows with clinical mastitis. Vet. Record., 148: 35-41. 3) El-barawy, A. M and Ali, M. A. 2011. Biochemical aspects of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. Zagazig Vet. J., 39: 54-65. 4) Fagiolo, A. and Lai, O. 2007. Mastitis in buffalo. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 6(Suppl. 2): 200-206. 5) FAO, 2004. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO Statistical Database (http://www.fao.org/faostat) 6) Guérin-faublée, V. Tardy, F. Bouveron, C. and Carret G. 2002. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus species isolated from clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents., 19: 219-226. 7) Hamann, J. and Gyodi, P. 2000. Somatic cells and electrical conductivity in relation to milking frequency. Milchwissensch, 55: 303-307. 8) Hamann, J. and Zecconi, A. 1998. Evaluation of the electrical conductivity of milk as a mastitis indicator. Bull. Int. Dairy Fed., 334: 5-22. 9) Hillerton, J. E. and Walton, A. W. 1991. Identification of subclinical mastitis with a hand-hold electrical conductivity meter. Vet. Rec., 128: 513-515. 10) Jones, G. M. 2006. Understanding the basics of mastitis. Virginia Cooperative Extension. Publication No. 404-233. Virginia State University, USA, pp: 1-7. 11) Khan, M. Z. and Khan, A. 2006. Basic facts of mastitis in dairy animals: a review. Pakistan Vet. J., 26: 204-208. 12) Kivaria, F. M., Noordhuizen, J. P. and Nielen, M. 2007. Interpretation of California mastitis test scores using Staphylococcus aureus culture results for screening of subclinical mastitis in low yielding smallholder dairy cows in the Dar es Salaam region of Tanzania. Prev. Vet. Med., 78: 274-285. 13) Mansell, P. D. and Seguya, A. 2003. The use of a hand-held conductivity meter for the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows during late lactation. New Zealand Vet. J., 51: 21-25. 14) Milner, P. K. L., Page, A. W. and Hillerton, J. E. 1996. Detection of clinical mastitis by changes in electrical conductivity of fore milk before visible changes in milk. J. Dairy Sci., 79: 83-86 15) Musser, J. M., Anderson, K. L. and Caballero, M. 1998. Evaluation of a hand-held electrical conductivity meter for detection of subclinical mastitis in cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res., 59: 1087-1091. 16) Nakajima, Y., Mikami, O., Yoshioka, M., Motoi, Y., Ito, T., Ishikawa, Y., Fuse, M., Nakano, K. and Yasukawa, K. 1997. Elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) activities in the sera and milk of cows with naturally occurring coliform mastitis. Res. Vet. Sci., 62: 297-298. 17) Nayan, V., Phulia, S. K., Bhardwaj, A., Jerome, A. and Singh, D. 2012. Transcripts of interleukins in mastitis affected and oxytocin administered buffaloes: Clinical significance and prognostic value. J. Biotechnol. Biomat., / S1: 2155-952X-S1.021-27/Special Issue. doi: 10.4172/2155-952X.S1.021 18) Nielen, M., Schukken, Y. and Brand, A. 1995. Detection of subclinical mastitis from on-line milking parlor data. J. Dairy Sci., 78: 1039-1049. 19) Oliver, S. P., Jayarao, B. M. and Almeida, R. A. 2005. Foodborne pathogens in milk and the dairy farm environment: food safety and public health implications. Foodborne Path. Dis., 2: 115-29. 20) Politis, I. and Ng-kawai-hang, K. F. 1988.

S160 Effects of somatic cell count and milk composition on cheese composition and cheeses making efficiency. J. Dairy Sci., 71: 1711-1719. 21) Premraj, A., Sreekumar, E., Nautiyal, B. and Rasool, T. J. 2006. Molecular characterization and prokaryotic expression of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Interleukin-6. Mol. Immunol., 43: 202-209. 22) Pyoral, A. S. 2003. Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Vet. Res., 34: 565578. 23) Rinaldi, M., Li, R. W. and Capuco, A.V. 2010. Mastitis associated transcriptomic disruptions in cattle. Vet. Immun. Immunopathol., 138: 267-279. 24) Sakemi, Y., Tamura, Y. and Hagiwara, K. 2011. Interleukin-6 in quarter milk as a further prediction marker for bovine subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Res., 78: 118-121. 25) Santos, J. E. P., Cerri, R. L. A., Kirk, J. H., Juchem, S. O. and Villasenor, M. 2004. Effect of prepartum milking of primigravid cows on mammary gland health and lactation performance. Livestock Prod. Sci., 86: 105-116. 26) Sharif, A., Ahmad, T., Bilal, M. Q., Yousaf, A. and Muhammad, G. 2007. Effect of severity of sub-clinical mastitis on somatic cell count and lactose contents of buffalo milk. Pakistan Vet. J., 27: 142-144. 27) Sharma, N., Singh, N. K. and Bhadwal, M. S. 2011. Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: an overview. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 24: 429-438. 28) Singh, R. S. and Bansal, B. K. 2004. Variation in selected components of milk among different milk fractions and its relevance to diagnosis of mastitis in buffaloes. Buffalo J., 20: 213-224. 29) Wang, J. Y., Xiao, H. B., Sun, Z. L. and Zhang, D. S. 2015. Angiopoietin-like protein 2 may mediate the inflammation in murine mastitis through the activation of interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-α. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 31: 1235-1240.