Multiple Species Certification

Similar documents
RADAGAST PET FOOD, INC

The EFSA s BIOHAZ Panel perspective on food microbiology and hygiene

Salmonella Initiatives: SIP, Poultry Slaughter Rule, NRTE Comminuted Poultry

F7 RODENT AND PEST CONTROL

Originally posted February 13, Update: March 26, 2018

Microbial Hazards in Dairy Industry Ceren Zeytinci

3. records of distribution for proteins and feeds are being kept to facilitate tracing throughout the animal feed and animal production chain.

Food-borne Zoonoses. Stuart A. Slorach

FSIS DIRECTIVE /31/04

KESMAVET. Disiapkan oleh Prof.Dr.Pratiwi Ts, drh,ms. kesmavet 1-pts

Meat contamination by Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia enterocolitica and EHEC O157 in Belgium

11-ID-10. Committee: Infectious Disease. Title: Creation of a National Campylobacteriosis Case Definition

On-Farm Salmonella Control Measures For. Pest Control

Johne s Disease Control

Care and Handling of Pets

Best Practice on the Farm

Chapter 9 Food Quality and Safety

Guidance for FDA Staff

Zoonoses in the EU and global context

NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, MARKETS & FOOD Division of Animal Industry 25 Capitol Street 2nd Floor P.O. Box 2042 Concord, NH

Chemical and microbiological hazards in human food, introduced maliciously through animals in the farms

FDA Announcement. For Immediate Release. Contact. Announcement. February 13, Consumers

Campylobacter species

Animal Antibiotic Use and Public Health

Approved by the Food Safety Commission on September 30, 2004

Controlling Salmonella in Meat and Poultry Products

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

MICROBIOLOGY of RAW MILK

Project Summary. Emerging Pathogens in US Cattle

Feline zoonoses. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee 12/09

FACT SHEETS. On the Danish restrictions of non-therapeutical use of antibiotics for growth promotion and its consequences

Above: life cycle of toxoplasma gondii. Below: transmission of this infection.

Risk Analysis of Infections Caused by Zoonoses of Alimentary Origin in the Selected Region of the Czech Republic

Antibiotic Symposium National Institute of Animal Agriculture Atlanta, Georgia

DANMAP and VetStat. Monitoring resistance and antimicrobial consumption in production animals

FAO-APHCA/OIE/USDA Regional Workshop on Prevention and Control of Neglected Zoonoses in Asia July, 2015, Obihiro, Japan.

RADAGAST PET FOOD, INC

Zoonotic Diseases. Risks of working with wildlife. Maria Baron Palamar, Wildlife Veterinarian

Antibiotic Resistance in the European Union Associated with Therapeutic use of Veterinary Medicines

Antimicrobial Resistance at human-animal interface in the Asia-Pacific Region

Trends and sources of Campylobacter in the EU, covered by EFSA s Community zoonoses summary report

Opening the Gates for Farmer Health National Center for Farm Health October 13, 2010

The Norwegian Zoonoses Report

Enteric Clostridia. C. perfringens: general

Walid Alali Assistant Professor, Food Safety Epidemiology

Livestock(cloven-hoofed animals and their products) Health Questionnaire(in relation to Article 4)

Enteric Clostridia 10/27/2011. C. perfringens: general. C. perfringens: Types & toxins. C. perfringens: Types & toxins

MAIL ORDER HATCHERIES: OPERATIONAL AND DISTRIBUTION LOGISTICS, SALMONELLA INTERVENTION ACTIVITIES AIMED AT PREVENTION OF HUMAN SALMONELLOSIS

Biocontainment. Within populations. The Sandhills Calving System. Actions to prevent the spread of infectious agents.

Generic Environmental Impact Statement on Animal Agriculture:

BEEF QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Overview. Livestock. Introduction to Livestock Insurance The Current Portfolio Why Insure Livestock? AEGIS London Offering.

EN SANCO/745/2008r6 EN EN

& chicken. Antibiotic Resistance

DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Agricultural Species

Food waste and pigs. Ashley Jordan Veterinary Officer. Supporting your success

Food safety and animal production systems: controlling zoonoses at farm level

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol for Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria, including Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria

TOC INDEX. Salmonellosis in Feedlot Cattle. Jane Pritchard. Take Home Message. Introduction

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

Checklist. KRAV s Extra Requirements for Sheep and Goat Meat. For verifying KRAV s extra requirements in the KRAV standards chapter 16 (edition 2017).

CROATIA TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

Checklist. KRAV s Extra Requirements for Sheep and Goat Meat. For verifying KRAV s extra requirements in the KRAV standards chapter 16 (edition 2018).

SUBCHAPTER 52K ANIMAL EXHIBITIONS SECTION.0100 PURPOSE AND SCOPE SECTION DEFINITIONS

Drd. OBADĂ MIHAI DORU. PhD THESIS ABSTRACT

Antibiotic resistance and the human-animal interface: Public health concerns

Surveillance programmes Summary of results

Human health impacts of antibiotic use in animal agriculture

Typically When & Whom?? When it first starts getting cold and other food sources are becoming scarce. Typically for us that is about mid-november. Whe

Addressing Antibiotic Resistance: Local Leadership Opportunities


Equine Husbandry and Preventive Health Care

THE BOVINE MILK MICROBIOME. Mark McGuire

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol Vegetative Bacteria

Recommended for Implementation at Step 7 of the VICH Process on 15 December 2004 by the VICH Steering Committee

Modernisation of meat inspection: Danish experience regarding finisher pigs

Biosecurity at the Farm Level. Dr. Ray Mobley Extension Veterinarian Florida A&M University. Introduction

Aide mémoire for environmental conditions and treatment of biological models

Food borne diseases: the focus on Salmonella

CALIFORNIA EGG LAWS & REGULATIONS: BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Reference Manual & Workbook JULY 2018

Salmonella Dublin: Clinical Challenges and Control

The Norwegian Zoonoses Report

ANNEX. to the COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

2010 EU Summary Report on Zoonoses: overview on Campylobacter

Colorado State Laws Affected by H.R. 4879

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) APPROVING INVESTIGATOR MANAGED USE SITES AND HOUSING AREAS

Preventable Practices

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Mexican Wolves and Infectious Diseases

LIVESTOCK BIOSECURITY

United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Inspection Report. Customer ID:

Infection Control and Standard Precautions

U.S. ORIGIN HEALTH CERTIFICATE FOR EXPORT OF RESEARCH RODENTS TO JAPAN

OIE Standards for Animal feed and food safety: terrestrial and aquatic animals

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 152(4)(b) thereof,

GENERAL PREVENTION PRACTICES CHECKLIST FOR SWINE PRODUCERS

Appendix II (Concerning the Article 21): Biosecurity Standards 3. Chickens, ducks, quail, pheasant, ostriches, guinea fowl and turkeys

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SUMMERLAND COUNCIL REPORT

DANMAP Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme

Transcription:

Section 10.3 Multiple Species Certification REFERENCED IN THIS SECTION: Number/ Identifier Name Importance STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 10.3 Multiple Species Manure Management Mandatory, if applicable FACT SHEET F-8 Toxoplasma

MULTIPLE SPECIES CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 1. If cats are kept in the barn, the following measures must be in place: a. Personnel must be trained on the additional risk associated with having cats in the barn and the implementation of good production practices to mitigate the risk of toxoplasmosis. b. Cats must be vaccinated for rabies. c. Only mature and neutered/spayed cats must be allowed in the barn or on-farm feed mill d. Feed carts and feeders must be covered. e. A litter box must be present in an area accessible only to cats (and humans) and kept clean. 2. Dogs must be kept out of the barn/building and on-farm feed mill. 3. Measures must be implemented that ensure wildlife is kept out of the barn/building and on-farm feed mill. 4. For cattle, other ruminants, horses and other non-avian species: a. Those species must be penned separately from pigs, and; b. An SOP must be adequately implemented and must include how the manure-management system can mitigate the risk of pathogen cross-contamination due to exposure to the fecal material of other species. 5. For poultry, fowl, and other avian species: a. Those species must not be housed in the same rooms as pigs, and; b. An SOP must be adequately implemented and include how the ventilation and manure-management system can mitigate the risk of pathogen cross-contamination. RATIONALE a. Toxoplasmosis i. Toxoplasmosis is one of the most significant parasitical diseases in humans living in developed countries, both in term of occurrence and health consequences. ii. The main reason why toxoplasmosis is still associated with pigs raised in closed facilities is the presence of cats. Pigs in direct contact with cat feces that contain the eggs of this parasite are believed to be the most common source of infection. It is also established in the scientific literature that finisher pigs raised in pasture are at risk of Toxoplasma infections (Wallander et al., 2016). iii. A significant proportion of infection in humans may occur after consumption of contaminated undercooked meat. This parasite presents a greater risk when immunosuppressed people or pregnant women are exposed for the first time. [10-3] 2

b. Domesticated Animals and Wildlife i. Dogs and cats may be actively infected carriers of many other human pathogens, such as Salmonella, and mechanical carriers of swine pathogens (e.g., transmissible gastroenteritis and porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED)). ii. Other cloven-hooved animals (e.g., cattle) may be carriers of foreign animal diseases and some microbes, such as E. coli O157:H7, that are not normally present in pigs. iii. Other types of wild animals and domesticated birds, such as poultry, can also transmit pathogens to pigs. GUIDANCE a. Multiple Species i. Generally speaking, in closed and well-maintained facilities, pigs harbour minimal contamination of the pathogenic bacteria (except Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica) that have the most significant impact on human health such as E. coli O157:H7 (and other shiga toxin producing E. coli), Campylobacter jejuni and Listeria monocytogenes. ii. For example, E. coli O157:H7, the bacteria that causes the well-known (beef) hamburger disease, is observed almost exclusively in cattle and other ruminants in Canada. It has very rarely been associated with swine and, when it was, it was often because of contact between pigs and live cattle or cattle feces. iii. Another example is Campylobacter jejuni, the most significant food-borne bacteria in terms of impact on human health. It is very commonly observed in poultry and cattle. iv. Keeping various animal species such as poultry and pigs within the same herd raises the very real concern of the possible emergence of new epidemic strains of influenza. New epidemic strains of human influenza emerge, usually, where poultry and pigs are raised close to each other and when humans are in regular contact with these animals. While it has little impact on food safety, the possibility that new pandemic strains could emerge cannot be ignored. b. Toxoplasma i. Although cats are considered by some people to be good rodent-control tools, cats and rodents often carry the same microbes. Therefore, when cats ingest rodents, there is an increased possibility that cats will become positive and shed even more parasites in the environment. ii. Cats are the definitive host of Toxoplasma and may shed the parasites in their feces and contaminate pigs that would otherwise be free. iii. Cats can carry, without any clinical signs, many microbes that may be harmful for humans, such as Salmonella and Toxoplasma. iv. Infections by Salmonella and Toxoplasma can both be transmitted to humans either directly through contact with feces (employees) or by meat (consumers). v. Although many people with toxoplasmosis show no symptoms, a significant proportion of infected people will experience clinical signs ranging from a flu-like syndrome to permanent eye diseases or even infant death. vi. Consult the Toxoplasma fact sheet for more details. [10-3] 3

AUDIT QUESTIONS Q# Audit Questions and Interpretations Verification Compliant NC-Minor NC-Major N/A Q10.3.1 If cats are kept in the barn or on site, verify whether the following measures have been implemented: a. Personnel have received training on the additional risks associated with having cats in the barn and on implementing good production practices to mitigate the risk of toxoplasmosis. b. Cats (part of the site population) have been vaccinated for rabies and vaccine certificates are available to demonstrate this. Only mature and neutered cats (part of the site population) are allowed in the barn or in the on-farm feed mill. There is proof that cats have been neutered or spayed (invoice, certificate). c. Feed carts and feeders are covered. d. A cat litter is located in an area accessible only to cats (and people) and is kept clean. Have the following measures been implemented if cats are kept in the barn or on site: R-B: Training Record invoice, certificate verification interview Q10.3.2 Q10.3.3 a. Have personnel received training on the additional risks associated with having cats in the barn and on implementing good production practices to mitigate the risk of toxoplasmosis? b. Have the cats been vaccinated for rabies? c. Are only mature and neutered cats allowed in the barn and near the on-farm feed mill? d. Are feed carts and feeders covered? e. Is the cat litter located in an area accessible only to cats (and people) and kept clean? Verify whether dogs are kept out of the barn/building and away from the on-farm feed mill. Are dogs kept out of the barn/building and/or on-farm feed mill? Verify whether measures that ensure wildlife is kept out of the barn/ building and on-farm feed mill have been implemented. Examples: a. doors b. fences in doors c. wire fence or screens in windows. Have measures ensuring that wildlife is kept out of the barn/ building and the on-farm feed mill been implemented? interview [10-3] 4

Q# Audit Questions and Interpretations Verification Compliant NC-Minor NC-Major N/A Q10.3.4 Q10.3.5 If cattle, other ruminants, horses and other non-avian species are kept in the same barn/ building verify that: a. these species are penned separately from pigs b. an SOP has been implemented that includes how the manure-management system can mitigate the cross-contamination of pathogens. Types of measures in place: a. Verify that a different manure management system is in place for each species. b. Describe how you mitigate the risk of other species feces contaminating the pig pen. For cattle, other ruminants, horses and other non-avian species: a. Are cattle, other ruminants and horses penned separately from pigs? b. Has an SOP that includes how the manure-management system can mitigate the cross-contamination of pathogens been adequately implemented? If poultry and other avian species are kept in the same barn/building, verify that a. poultry and other avian species are housed in a room that is separate from the pigs, and b. an SOP that includes how the ventilation and manuremanagement system can mitigate the cross-contamination of pathogens has been adequately implemented. Types of measures in place: a. The ventilation system is separate for each species. b. A different manure-management system is in place for each species. For poultry and other avian species: a. Are poultry and other avian species housed in a room that is separate from the pigs? b. Has an SOP that includes how the ventilation and manuremanagement systems can mitigate the cross-contamination of pathogens been adequately implemented? SOP 10.3: Multiple Species Manure Management SOP 10.3: Multiple Species Manure Management N/A = not applicable; SOP = standard operating procedure. [10-3] 5

LEVELS OF COMPLIANCE EXAMPLES COMPLIANT All appropriate measures for keeping cats in the barn are being followed. No dogs are in the barn or near the on-farm feed mill. A written SOP is in place if other species are kept in the same barn. MINOR NON-COMPLIANCE Not applicable. MAJOR NON-COMPLIANCE Timeline: 60 days Appropriate measures for keeping cats in the barn are not being followed. Other species are being kept in the same barn and no written SOP is in place. Dogs have access to the barn and the on-farm feed mill. [10-3] 6