Fecal shedding of Clostridium difficile in dogs: a period prevalence survey in a veterinary medical teaching hospital

Similar documents
PCR detection of Leptospira in. stray cat and

Enteric Clostridia. C. perfringens: general

The Epidemiology Of Clostridium Difficile Infections Among Oncology Patients

Clostridium difficile Colitis

Enteric Clostridia 10/27/2011. C. perfringens: general. C. perfringens: Types & toxins. C. perfringens: Types & toxins

Overview of C. difficile infections. Kurt B. Stevenson, MD MPH Professor Division of Infectious Diseases

Preventing Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI)

Community-Associated C. difficile Infection: Think Outside the Hospital. Maria Bye, MPH Epidemiologist May 1, 2018

Healthcare-associated Infections Annual Report December 2018

Evaluation of a computerized antimicrobial susceptibility system with bacteria isolated from animals

Clostridium Difficile Primer: Disease, Risk, & Mitigation

Microbiology : antimicrobial drugs. Sheet 11. Ali abualhija

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

MRSA surveillance 2014: Poultry

Quantitative Study of Antibiotic-Induced Susceptibility to

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(8):

General Approach to Infectious Diseases

Should we test Clostridium difficile for antimicrobial resistance? by author

11-ID-10. Committee: Infectious Disease. Title: Creation of a National Campylobacteriosis Case Definition

Healthcare-associated Infections Annual Report March 2015

Preventing Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Infections. For National Patient Safety Goal

Inappropriate Use of Antibiotics and Clostridium difficile Infection. Jocelyn Srigley, MD, FRCPC November 1, 2012

Project Summary. Emerging Pathogens in US Cattle

Biological Threat Fact Sheets

11/2/2015. Update on the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infections. Disclosure. Objectives

Diagnosing intestinal parasites. Clinical reference guide for Fecal Dx antigen testing

Diagnosing intestinal parasites. Clinical reference guide for Fecal Dx antigen testing

Running head: CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE 1

*Corresponding Author:

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE

ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY AND CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE INFECTION

Section 10: Antimicrobial Stewardship and Clostridium difficile Infection: A Primer for the Infection Preventionist

Clostridium difficile may be found in 1% to 3% of all

مادة االدوية المرحلة الثالثة م. غدير حاتم محمد

Healthcare-associated Infections Annual Report

Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) Alistair McGregor Hobart Pathology Royal Hobart Hospital TIPCU

Critical Appraisal Topic. Antibiotic Duration in Acute Otitis Media in Children. Carissa Schatz, BSN, RN, FNP-s. University of Mary

Evaluating the Role of MRSA Nasal Swabs

BIOLACTAM. Product Description. An innovative in vitro diagnostic for the rapid quantitative determination of ß-lactamase activity

Standing Orders for the Treatment of Outpatient Peritonitis

Taking Action to Prevent and Manage Multidrug-resistant Organisms and C. difficile in the Nursing Home: Part 1 Reviewing the organisms

Burn Infection & Laboratory Diagnosis

ECOLOGICAL IMPACT OF NARROW SPECTRUM ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS COMPARED TO BROAD SPECTRUM AGENTS ON THE HUMAN INTESTINAL MICROFLORA CARL ERIK NORD

FM - Male, 38YO. MRSA nasal swab (+) Due to positive MRSA nasal swab test, patient will be continued on Vancomycin 1500mg IV q12 for MRSA treatment...

Alfonso Torress-Cook, Dr.P.H. Director of Epidemiology/Patient Safety Pacific Hospital of Long Beach

Antibiotic therapy of acute gastroenteritis

Objectives. Basic Microbiology. Patient related. Environment related. Organism related 10/12/2017

Surveillance of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms

Biology 120 Lab Exam 2 Review

Rapid molecular testing to detect Staphylococcus aureus in positive blood cultures improves patient management. Martin McHugh Clinical Scientist

Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO)

Prevalence of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiogram in a tertiary care centre

Clostridium difficile infection: The Present and the Future

Outline 1/13/15. Range is mostly surrounding Puerto Rico Important for Tourism and ecological balance

Newsflash: Hospital Medicine JOHN C. CHRISTENSEN, MD FACP AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, UTAH CHAPTER SCIENTIFIC MEETING FEBRUARY 10, 2017

Standing Orders for the Treatment of Outpatient Peritonitis

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Medical Genetics and Diagnosis Lab #3. Gel electrophoresis

Lactose-Fermenting Bacteria Isolated from

FDA Announcement. For Immediate Release. Contact. Announcement. February 13, Consumers

Molecular Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus of Camel (Camelus dromedarius) Skin Origin

Antibiotic Stewardship in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Objectives. Background 4/20/2017. Natasha Nakra, MD April 28, 2017

Overview. There are commonly found arrangements of bacteria based on their division. Spheres, Rods, Spirals

Author - Dr. Josie Traub-Dargatz

Test Method Modified Association of Analytical Communities Test Method Modified Germicidal Spray Products as Disinfectants

Georgia State University. Georgia State University. Zirka Thompson. Spring

Give the Right Antibiotics in Trauma Mitchell J Daley, PharmD, BCPS

SOFT Movement Survey of FMT Programs

OPTIMIZATION OF PK/PD OF ANTIBIOTICS FOR RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(3):

amoxycillin/clavulanate vs placebo in the prevention of infection after animal

Taking Action to Prevent and Manage Multidrug-resistant Organisms and C. difficile in the Nursing Home: Part 2 Understanding the spread

SESSION XVI NEW ANTIBIOTICS

Q1. (a) Clostridium difficile is a bacterium that is present in the gut of up to 3% of healthy adults and 66% of healthy infants.

USA Product Label CLINTABS TABLETS. Virbac. brand of clindamycin hydrochloride tablets. ANADA # , Approved by FDA DESCRIPTION

Co-transfer of bla NDM-5 and mcr-1 by an IncX3 X4 hybrid plasmid in Escherichia coli 4

Recommended for Implementation at Step 7 of the VICH Process on 15 December 2004 by the VICH Steering Committee

Bacterial infections in the urinary tract

Diabetic Foot Infection. Dr David Orr Consultant Microbiologist Lancashire Teaching Hospitals

BMC Infectious Diseases

Florida Health Care Association District 2 January 13, 2015 A.C. Burke, MA, CIC

Learning Objectives 6/1/18

ESBL Producers An Increasing Problem: An Overview Of An Underrated Threat

Multiple drug resistance pattern in Urinary Tract Infection patients in Aligarh

Short information about the ZOBA. Participating on proficiency tests. Monitoring programme

Typhoid fever - priorities for research and development of new treatments

Urinary Tract Infection Workshop

Detection of Methicillin Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Using Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Antibiotic Prophylaxis Update

Clinical Spectrum of Disease. Clinical Features. Risk Factors. Risk of CDAD According to Antibiotic Class. Fluoroquinolones as Risk Factor for CDAD

Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Salmonella species from various antibiotic

Raw Meat Diet. Transcript:

Does Screening for MRSA Colonization Have A Role In Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Programs?

Antibiotics & Resistance

We Check Your Pets For Internal Parasites

Coccidia and Giardia Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment

Visit ABLE on the Web at:

Comparative Assessment of b-lactamases Produced by Multidrug Resistant Bacteria

The prevalence of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin in dogs with acute diarrhea in southwestern Iceland.

Principles of Antimicrobial therapy

Transcription:

J Vet Diagn Invest 6:342-347 (1994) Fecal shedding of Clostridium difficile in dogs: a period prevalence survey in a veterinary medical teaching hospital Andrea L. Struble, Yajarayma J. Tang, Philip H. Kass, Paul H. Gumerlock, Bruce R. Madewell, Joseph Silva, Jr. Abstract. The goal of this study was to determine the fecal prevalence of Clostridium difficile in dogs who were patients at a veterinary medical teaching hospital. Stool specimens collected from 152 dogs (in- and outpatients) were analyzed for the presence of C. difficile. An additional 42 stool specimens were collected and examined from dogs recently housed at local animal shelters. Following culture on selective medium, C. difficile was identified by a latex agglutination test, and the presence of the toxin A and B genes was determined individually by polymerase chain reaction. Clostridium difficile was isolated from the feces of 28 of the veterinary hospital patients (18.4%); isolates from 14 of these patients (50.0%) were toxigenic. Diarrhea was a clinical finding in 5 (35.7%) of the dogs carrying toxigenic isolates of C. difficile, whereas diarrhea was noted in only 2 of 14 dogs (14.3%) shedding nontoxigenic isolates. Three of 14 dogs (2 1.4%) shedding toxigenic isolates of C. difficile were receiving antibiotics at the time of stool collection, whereas 5 of 14 dogs (37.5%) shedding nontoxigenic strains of C. difficile were receiving antibiotics. The carriage rate of C. difficile was significantly higher for animals categorized as inpatients of the veterinary hospital. The carriage rate also provided evidence for an increased risk for fecal shedding with increasing age. Clostridium difficile was not isolated from any of the 42 dogs recently housed at local animal shelters. This study confirms the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in dogs at a veterinary teaching hospital. Additional studies will be required to determine whether prior antibiotic treatment increases the frequency of C. difficile fecal shedding from dogs and whether colonized dogs are a risk for transmission of the organism to susceptible human populations. In human patients, Clostridium difficile is the major cause of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. 3 Clostridium difficile is a large gram-positive anaerobic spore-forming motile rod. Most isolates of C. difficile associated with enterocolitis produce two types of toxins, which damage colonic epithelium: toxin A (enterotoxin) and toxin B (cytotoxin). Toxin A causes hemorrhagic fluid accumulation in rabbit ileum and detachment of its epithelial cells. Toxin B acts synergistically with toxin A as a cytotoxin only after the epithelium has been injured by toxin A. 15 As a result, there is a extravasation of plasma proteins and alteration of water and electrolyte transport. 14 Clinical consequence of infection in humans ranges from asymptomatic carriage to cholera-like diarrhea with as many as 20 watery stools per day. 2,19 The great majority of human C. difficile infections appear to be acquired from the environment. Relapses following treatment for human C. difficile-associated From the Departments of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences (Struble, Madewell) and Population Health and Reproduction (Kass), School of Veterinary Medicine, and the Cancer and Molecular Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine (Tang, Gumerlock, Silva), University of California, Davis, CA 95616. Received for publication November 12, 1993. 342 diarrhea occur in 15-20% of patients, and these relapses have been attributed to persistence of the infectious agent in the patient in the spore form. 11 It is also possible that these patients are being infected from a different exogenous source or reinfected. In a study of 11 patients with diarrheal recurrences associated with C. difficile, 5 of those patients had new strains of the bacteria, as determined by chromosomal restriction endonuclease analysis. In contrast, the other six patients had relapses with the same strain of the organism. 11 In another study, 75% of diarrheal relapse patient specimens demonstrated new strains of the organism. 17 Clostridium difficile infections have been documented from both exogenous and endogenous sources. Exogenous sources include soil, peat, and marine sediments. Animals may be reservoirs of human disease. 5 Clostridium difficile has been demonstrated in the stools of domestic animals, including camels, cattle, horses, donkeys, and hamsters, and of a snake and a sea1. 13 Household pets have also been described to shed the organism in their feces. Infection rates of 23% and 39.5% were reported in two separate studies in dogs, and both toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains were isolated. 5,18 Diarrhea was a clinical finding in several infected dogs. 4 The data from those surveys were incomplete, however, with respect to associations between

clinical signs and antibiotic exposures of the infected animals. Another study demonstrated the presence of C. difficile in both dogs and cats, but association of clinical signs with the presence of C. difficile was not clear. 20 The authors concluded that C. difficile was not highly associated with clinical signs; 9.3% of dogs with enteric signs and 2.7% of dogs without enteric signs were positive for the organism. That study did not investigate whether the isolates of C. difficile carried the toxin A and B genes. In the present study, we investigated the possibility that C. difficile was shed in feces from canine patients at the University of California Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital and, when present, determined if the organisms were toxigenic using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). 8 The role of several factors that could influence risk for C. difficile infection, namely, age of the animal, concurrent use of antibiotic or immunosuppressive agents, and overnight stay in the hospital, was also evaluated. Materials and methods Animals. The dogs studied were part of the clinical population of the University of California Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Davis. Fecal samples were collected from 152 dogs, including both inpatients and outpatients. An inpatient was defined as an animal admitted to the teaching hospital and hospitalized for at least 1 day. An outpatient was defined as an animal never placed in a ward or admitted to the hospital. Forty-two dogs housed recently at local animal shelters were also investigated. The animals all were housed for at least 2 days at a facility on campus away from the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital and were previously housed for an unknown period at local shelters. Culture and identification of C. difficile. Fecal samples were obtained from the dogs either digitally or by retrieval soon after defecation and immediately frozen at -20 C until analysis was performed. Clostridium difficile was cultured from fecal specimens in plates containing cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA), a medium selective for the organism. 7 The medium was prereduced for 5 hr before use. The cultures were anaerobically incubated at 37 C for 36-48 hr. All C. difficile strains were maintained in cooked meat broth. Clostridium difficile strains were identified using a commercial latex agglutination test. b DNA extraction and amplification. DNA from an isolated colony was extracted by boiling the colony in 100 µl sterile distilled deionized water for 10 min followed by centrifuging for 5 min at 3,000 rpm to remove cellular debris. The DNA content in the supernatant was quantitated by spectrophotometry at 260 nm, setting 1 A 260 unit equal to 50 µg/ml. The sequences of the oligonucleotide primers for the toxin B gene were 5'-GGTGGAGCTTCAATTGGAGAG-3' (YT- 17; downstream) and 5'-GTGTAACCTACTTTCATAA- CACCAG-3' (YT-18; upstream). 10 The sequences of the primers used to amplify the toxin A gene were 5'-GCAT- GATAAGGCAACACAGTGG-3' (YT-28; downstream) and 5'-GAGTAAGTTCCTCCTGCTCCATCAA-3' (YT-29; up- Clostridium difficile shedding in dogs 343 stream) (Y. J. Tang et al., unpublished data). A previously described method was used for PCR amplification employing the thermostable DNA polymerase 16 (rtaq). c The PCR profile used in these experiments included a denaturing step at 95 C for 30 sec followed by annealing of the primers at 55 C for 30 sec with an extension for 30 sec at 72 C. All amplifications were done for 40 cycles in a DNA thermal cycler. c In all cases, 1 µg DNA was used for each reaction. All PCR analyses were done with positive (known human isolates) and negative (no DNA) controls. All isolates negative for amplification of toxin gene sequences were further confirmed as C. difficile by PCR using primers directed at specific sequences in the C. difficile 16S rrna gene; 5'-CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT-3' (downstream; B), and 5'-CTCTTGAAACTGGGAGACTTGA-3' (upstream; PG-48) as previously reported. 9 Detection of amplified products. Amplification products were resolved on 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and photographed under ultraviolet light. Southern blot analysis. After visualization of the PCR products, confirmation that these products were derived from toxin gene sequences was done by Southern blotting using internally positioned oligonucleotides as probes and a nonradioactive enzyme chemiluminescence detection system, d as previously described. 9 Hybridization of the blot was done with 10 pmol of probe YT-20 for toxin B (5'-GTGGAGTGT- TACAAACAGGTG-3') 10 and YT-30 for toxin A (5'- ACTGGAGCAGTTCCAGGTTTAAGATC-3') (Y. J. Tang et al., unpublished data). The blots were then incubated with strepavidin-horseradish peroxidase, washed, and developed as described previously. 9 The blots were exposed to radiographic film e for 30 min. The film was developed, and the results interpreted. Statistical analysis. Data were analyzed with logistic regression using methods employing exact conditional inference on the parameters. f Results Fecal samples from 152 dogs from the University of California Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital and from 42 dogs housed recently at local animal shelters were examined for the presence of C. difficile. Twenty-eight (18.4%) of the samples from the teaching hospital contained C. difficile by CCFA direct plating and confirmation by a latex particle agglutination test (Table 1). Fourteen (50.0%) of these samples contained the genes for toxins A and B as determined by PCR analysis with confirmation by Southern blot hybridization (Fig. 1). Clostridium difficile was not isolated from any specimen from the 42 dogs from the local animal shelters. Diarrhea was a clinical finding in 42 (27.6%) of the 152 hospital cases. Seven (16.7%) of these 42 samples contained C. difficile. Of these 7, 5 (7 1.4%) contained toxigenic C. difficile. Diarrhea was not a clinical sign in any shelter animal. The frequency of shedding of C. difficile from dogs with and without diarrhea was not significantly different. Diarrhea was also not found to

344 Struble et al. of C. difficile than were outpatients (OR = 6.0, 95% CI = [0.97, 37.301). The hospital dogs were divided into three subgroups based on their age (<2 years old, 2-8 years old, and >8 years old). Of the 41 dogs less than 2 years old, none carried C. difficile. Sixty-three dogs were 2-8 years old and 15 (23.8%) of these dogs were positive for C. difficile, with 6 (40.0%) of these shedding toxigenic isolates. Forty-eight dogs were older than 8 years, and 13 (27.1%) carried C. difficile, with 8 (6 1.5%) of these carrying toxigenic strains. These data provide evidence for a statistically increased risk for colonization with increasing age (OR = 17.45, 95% CI = 2.81, not calculable). The shelter animals were all adult animals of unknown age and thus could not be evaluated for age/ carriage analysis. be a risk factor for predicting whether the isolates of C. difficile were toxigenic or nontoxigenic. The concurrent use of antibiotics was not found to be significantly different between animals that were C. difficile positive or negative and between the toxigenic and C. difficile nontoxigenic isolates. Forty-one (27.0%) of the original 152 canine patients received antibiotic therapy; 8 (19.5%) shed C. difficile, and of these 3 (37.5%) shed toxigenic strains. Dogs from the local animal shelters were not concurrently being administered any medications. Twenty-six ( 17.1%) of the dogs studied were receiving immunosuppressive drug therapy. Two (7.7%) of these dogs shed nontoxigenic C. difficile as demonstrated by neither isolate carrying the genes for toxin A or B. No significant association was found between concurrent immunosuppressive drug therapy and C. difficile carriage. Animals from the local animal shelters had not received any immunosuppressive therapy. The hospital status of the animals was also examined. Eighty-six (56.6%) of the 152 dogs were classified as inpatients: 19 (22.1%) of these inpatients shed C. difficile. Twelve (63.2%) of these C. difficile-positive inpatients carried toxigenic strains. The carriage rate of C. difficile was significantly higher for animals categorized as inpatients when compared to those categorized as outpatients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75, 4.28). Inpatients were also more likely to be colonized with toxigenic strains Discussion Clostridium difficile is the major cause of antibioticassociated diarrhea and colitis (AAC) in humans. 1 Relapse of diarrheal disease occurs in 15-20% of human patients following antimicrobial treatment for C. difficile. In 1 study, more than half of the relapses were due to infection with a new strain of organism. 17 It has been previously suggested that household pets may play a role in the infection and/or reinfection of humans. 5 Three previously published studies have reported the presence of C. difficile in dogs, although none of the studies were conducted in the United States. Isolation frequencies of 6%, 21%, and 40% were reported 5,18,20 In the present study C. difficile was isolated from 18% of the feces examined; this figure was derived from culture of single fecal samples, which may be relatively insensitive for detection of an enteric bacterial pathogen, and a higher rate of isolation may have been obtained by repeated samplings. These differences in isolation frequencies can be explained as a reflection of the different techniques for isolation of the organism, the small sample sizes, different prevailing risk factors, or the different geographic locations of the animals. In a previous study, differences in isolation frequencies between two veterinary hospitals were significant. l8 The additional observation in this study that no shelter dogs harbored C. difficile deserves further study. In the present study, 50% of the isolates were toxigenic. This finding is similar to that of 1 previous study, 18 whereas other studies have demonstrated mostly nontoxigenic strains. 5,20 In those studies, the presence of toxin B was detected using labor-intensive methods such as bovine embryonic lung fibroblastic cell neutralization or the ability to induce fatal ileocaecitis in hamsters. In this study, the PCR, employing

Clostridium difficile shedding in dogs 345 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Figure 1. PCR products of DNA extracted from C. difficile isolates from dogs. A, B. Ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gel (A) and Southern blot (B) analysis of PCR products amplified with primers directed at the toxin A gene (602 bp). Lane 1. 123-bp DNA marker ladder. Lanes 2, 3. No toxin A gene sequences detected, Lanes 4-7. Toxin A gene sequences amplified in the strains. Lane 8. Blank. C, D. Ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gel (C) and Southern blot (D) analysis of PCR products amplified with primers directed at the toxin B gene (399 bp). Lane 1. Blank. Lanes 2, 3. No toxin B gene sequences detected. Lanes 4-7. Toxin B gene sequences amplified from the strains. Lane 8. 123-bp DNA marker ladder. amplimers targeted to specific segments of the C. dif- clinical specimens. 10 Previous work determined the ficile toxin genes, was used to identify toxigenic iso- sensitivity of this assay to be 10-100-fold greater than lates. The PCR approach is a highly specific, sensitive, that of the traditional clinical assays for C. difficile. 7,9,10 and rapid assay for identifying toxigenic C. difficile in In contrast to C. difficile infections in humans, canine

346 Struble et al. ceiving either vincristine, adriamycin, or cyclophos- most of these dogs were phamide therapy. Further-more, treated as outpatients, without overnight hospitalization. In humans, there appears to be an age-related susceptibility to clinical signs associated with C. diffcile infection. Children often are colonized with toxigenic C. difficile with no clinical signs. 2 Lower prevalence rates of colonization with the organism are found when the intestinal flora changes at 6-12 months of age. Older children develop AAC infrequently, even after exposure to antibiotics. 2 Adults appear to be much more susceptible to the deleterious effects of C. difficile and its toxins. In the present study, no young dogs (< 2 years of age) were found to be colonized with C. difficile. In contrast, a previous study reported C. difficile isolates in 5.1% of dogs under 12 months of age and 7.6% in dogs > 1 year old. 20 The apparent increased risk for fecal shedding of C. difficile in the dog with increasing age, as noted here and in previous studies, must be interpreted cautiously until the effects of additional risk factors such as diet, location of patient in the hospital, and others are examined critically. The patient status of the animal was also investigated to determine if hospitalization could be a factor in acquiring C. difficile colonization. In this study, an inpatient was at an increased risk of carrying the organism, possibly because of spores in the environment, carriage of the organism on the hands/clothing of personnel, and/or transmission from patient to patient. Clostridium difficile was not isolated from any of the animals from the local animal shelters. All of the dogs had normal appearing feces and were not currently receiving any medications, either antibiotic or immunosuppressive. All animals were adult, although exact ages were not known. The importance of this animal reservoir in human disease has yet to be determined. Prospective studies should be aimed at identifying dogs and humans colonized with C. difficile and sharing the same environment and then to determine whether the strains isolated from the animals and humans are the same or different. Alternatively, it might be determined that enteric colonization of the dog with C. difficile is an indication of contamination ofthe environment. This possibility might be studied by serial cultures of dogs after their discharge from the hospital environment. Sources and manufacturers C. difficile carriage does not appear to be highly correlated with clinical diarrheal disease, even amongst animals from which toxigenic strains were isolated. A previous study demonstrated that approximately 3% of healthy adults and 10-25% of hospitalized patients harbored C. difficile as part of their normal intestinal flora, and these infections were not associated with diarrhea. 2 Diarrhea was a clinical finding in 42 of the 152 hospital cases studied herein, and 7 (16.7%) of these 42 samples contained C. difficile. Of these 7 C. difficile-positive samples, 5 contained toxigenic C. difficile. Diarrhea was not a clinical finding in any of the C. difficile-colonized dogs examined in 1 study, although toxigenicity was not examined. 5 A different study also reported that only 2.7% of the studied clinical patients with diarrhea shed C. difficile in their feces, whereas 9.3% of the dogs without diarrhea cultured positive for the organism, 2 of which were toxigenic. 20 The use of antibiotics and animal age were also investigated in this study. Antibiotic-associated colitis can be induced by almost any oral, parenteral, or topical antibiotic therapy, although the antibiotics most frequently implicated include clindamycin, ampicillin, and the cephalosporins (these have a broad spectrum of aerobic and anerobic activity). 6 A short duration of antibiotic exposure (such as when given for perioperative prophylaxis and therapy as much as 6 weeks previously) has been shown to increase risk for C. difficile infection. 6 Concurrent antibiotic therapy in this study did not appear to correlate with an increased carriage rate: 8.5% of the dogs currently receiving antibiotics cultured positive for C. difficile, whereas 6.2% of the dogs with no current antibiotic exposure were culture positive. These findings are in contrast to those described in 1 study showing an association between C. difficile infection and antibiotic exposure. 18 The types and/or length of antibiotic treatments may be a determining factor in the carriage prevalence. In one study, 18 the antibiotics used were primarily penicillin and streptomycin, whereas in our study various antibiotics were used. Dogs carrying C. difficile had been treated with enterofloxin, cephalothin, or nafacillin, whereas the treated dogs in which C. difficile was not found had been given a wide variety of antibiotics. Further studies should be done to determine if there are specific antibiotics that place dogs at an increased risk for colonization with C. difficile and if the route and frequency of administration are also factors that influence risk for fecal shedding of organisms. AAC in human patients has also been associated with the administration of cancer chemotherapy. 12 particularly methotrexate and fluorouracil. 2 In the present study, immunosuppressive therapy did not appear to increase the risk for C. difficile carriage in the dog. Most of the dogs studied were lymphosarcoma patients re- a. Central Media, Sacramento, CA. b. Culturette Brand CDT, Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD. c. Perkin Elmer-Cetus, Norwalk, CT. d. Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL. e. Kodak, XAR film, Rochester, NY. f. Cytel Software, Cambridge, MA.

References 11. 1. Bartlett JG: 1990, Clostridium difficile: clinical considerations. Rev Infect Dis 12:s243-s251. 2. Bartlett JG: 1992, Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 15:573-581. 3. Bartlett JG, Chang TW, Gurwith M, et al.: 1978, Antibioticassociated pseudomembranous colitis due to toxin-producing Clostridia. N Engl J Med 298:531-534. 4. Berry AP, Levett PN: 1986, Chronic diarrhea in dogs associated with Clostridium difficile. Vet Rec 118: 102-103. 5. Borriello SR, Honour P, Turner T, Barclay F: 1983, Household pets as a potential reservoir for Clostridium difficile infection. J Clin Pathol 36:84-87. 6. Fekety R, Shah AB: 1993, Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis. J Am Med Assoc 269:71-75. 7. George WL, Sutter VL, Citron D, Finegold SM: 1979, Selective and differential medium for isolation of C. difficile. J Clin Microbiol 9:214-219. 8. Gumerlock PH, Tang YJ, Silva J: 1993, PCR detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. In: Diagnostic molecular microbiology, ed. Persing DH, pp. 288-295. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. 9. Gumerlock PH, Tang YJ, Meyers FJ, Silva J: 1991, Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the specific and direct detection of Clostridium difficile in human feces. Rev Infect Dis 13:1053-1060. 10. Gumerlock PH, Tang YJ, Weiss JB, Silva J: 1993, Specific detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 31:507-511. Clostridium difficile shedding in dogs 347 Johnson SJ, Adelman A, Clabots CR, et al.: 1989, Recurrences of Clostridium difficile diarrhea not caused by the original infecting organism. J Infect Dis 159:340-343. 12. Kamthan AG, Bruckner HW, Hirschman SZ, Agus SG: 1992, Clostridium difficile diarrhea induced by cancer chemotherapy. Arch Inter Med 152:1715-1717. 13. Levett PN: 1986, Clostridium difficile in habitats other than the human gastrointestinal tract. J Inf Dis 12:253-256. 14. Lyerly DM, Krivan HC, Wilkens TD: 1988, Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins. Clin Microbiol Rev 1:1-18. 15. Mitchell TJ, Ketley JM, Haslam SC: 1986, Effect of toxin A and B of Clostridium difficile on rabbit ileum and colon. Gut 27:78-85. 16. Mullis KB, Faloona FA: 1987, Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol 155:335-350. 17. O Neill GL, Beaman MH, Riley TV: 1991, Relapse versus reinfection with Clostridium difficile. Epidemiol Infect 107:627-635. 18. Riley TV, Adams JE, O Neill GL, Bowman RA: 1991, Gastrointestinal carriage of Clostridium difficile in cats and dogs attending veterinary clinics. Epidemiol Infect 107:659-665. 19. Riley TV, Wetherall F, Bowman J, et al.: 1991, Diarrheal disease due to Clostridium difficile in general practice. Pathology 23:346-349. 20. Weber A, Kroth P, Heil G: 1989, Untersuchungen zum Vorkommen von Clostridium difficile in Kotproben von Hunden und Katzen. J Vet Med B36:568-576.