CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Similar documents
CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

Mercy Medical Center Des Moines, Iowa Department of Pathology. Microbiology Department Antibiotic Susceptibility January December 2016

CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology

INFECTIOUS DISEASES DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY NEWSLETTER

2016 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

2015 Antibiotic Susceptibility Report

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Advanced Course

2010 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Children s Hospital

2012 ANTIBIOGRAM. Central Zone Former DTHR Sites. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Aberdeen Hospital. Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns For Commonly Isolated Organisms For 2015

2017 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

2016 Antibiogram. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services. including. Red Deer Regional Hospital. St. Mary s Hospital, Camrose

2009 ANTIBIOGRAM. University of Alberta Hospital and the Stollery Childrens Hospital

2015 Antibiogram. Red Deer Regional Hospital. Central Zone. Alberta Health Services

Concise Antibiogram Toolkit Background

Understanding the Hospital Antibiogram

Table 1. Commonly encountered or important organisms and their usual antimicrobial susceptibilities.

Childrens Hospital Antibiogram for 2012 (Based on data from 2011)

BACTERIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY REPORT: 2016 (January 2016 December 2016)

RCH antibiotic susceptibility data

Antibiotic. Antibiotic Classes, Spectrum of Activity & Antibiotic Reporting

Help with moving disc diffusion methods from BSAC to EUCAST. Media BSAC EUCAST

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Summary 2011

Recommendations Regarding Use of Rapid Blood Pathogen Identification Panel Data

CUMULATIVE ANTIBIOGRAM

C&W Three-Year Cumulative Antibiogram January 2013 December 2015

Leveraging the Lab and Microbiology Department to Optimize Stewardship

BactiReg3 Event Notes Module Page(s) 4-9 (TUL) Page 1 of 21

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Summary 2012

UNDERSTANDING THE ANTIBIOGRAM

Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) CHRISTUS SETX

جداول میکروارگانیسم های بیماریزای اولویت دار و آنتی بیوتیک های تعیین شده برای آزمایش تعیین حساسیت ضد میکروبی در برنامه مهار مقاومت میکروبی

UNDERSTANDING YOUR DATA: THE ANTIBIOGRAM

Antimicrobial susceptibility

a. 379 laboratories provided quantitative results, e.g (DD method) to 35.4% (MIC method) of all participants; see Table 2.

Suggestions for appropriate agents to include in routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing

QUICK REFERENCE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Pseudomonas sp. Xantomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter sp. & Flavomonas sp.)

EUCAST recommended strains for internal quality control

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

What s new in EUCAST methods?

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Mark Your Calendars Now! Next Event Ships: September 14, 2015

Principles of Infectious Disease. Dr. Ezra Levy CSUHS PA Program

microbiology testing services

THE NAC CHALLENGE PANEL OF ISOLATES FOR VERIFICATION OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING METHODS

The β- Lactam Antibiotics. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The University of Jordan November 2018

Routine internal quality control as recommended by EUCAST Version 3.1, valid from

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: The Basics

Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy: Antibiograms

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

The Basics: Using CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards

January 2014 Vol. 34 No. 1

Compliance of manufacturers of AST materials and devices with EUCAST guidelines

Intrinsic, implied and default resistance

Guidelines for Laboratory Verification of Performance of the FilmArray BCID System

The Nuts and Bolts of Antibiograms in Long-Term Care Facilities

Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital Antimicrobial Criteria Updated 11/16/16

Preserve the Power of Antibiotics

Interpreting Microbiology reports for better Clinical Decisions Interpreting Antibiogrammes

SHC Clinical Pathway: HAP/VAP Flowchart

Educating Clinical and Public Health Laboratories About Antimicrobial Resistance Challenges

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Summary 2017

4 th and 5 th generation cephalosporins. Naderi HR Associate professor of Infectious Diseases

EARS Net Report, Quarter

Solution Title: Antibiotic Stewardship: A Journey Toward the Triple Aim

DISCLAIMER: ECHO Nevada emphasizes patient privacy and asks participants to not share ANY Protected Health Information during ECHO clinics.

HUSRES Annual Report 2007 Martti Vaara.

Approach to pediatric Antibiotics

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy in HAP: What does this mean?

National Clinical Guideline Centre Pneumonia Diagnosis and management of community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults

Performance Information. Vet use only

Principles of Antibiotics Use & Spectrum of Some

1. The preferred treatment option for an initial UTI episode in a 22-year-old female patient

Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in the Province of British Columbia

Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program 2018 SURVEILLANCE FOR HEALTHCARE ACQUIRED CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SHUNT ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS

Advanced Practice Education Associates. Antibiotics

GENERAL NOTES: 2016 site of infection type of organism location of the patient

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

Chemotherapy of bacterial infections. Part II. Mechanisms of Resistance. evolution of antimicrobial resistance

York Chairman David B. Jones, MD

5/4/2018. Multidrug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) Objectives. Outline. Define a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO)

Antimicrobial Resistance Advisory Workgroup (ARAW) Members

Penicillins - EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints (version 1.3)

Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics

Helen Heffernan and Rosemary Woodhouse Antibiotic Reference Laboratory

Perichondritis: Source: UpToDate Ciprofloxacin 10 mg/kg/dose PO (max 500 mg/dose) BID Inpatient: Ceftazidime 50 mg/kg/dose q8 hours IV

Bugs and Drugs Handbook 2017

Similar to Penicillins: -Chemically. -Mechanism of action. -Toxicity.

Antibiotic Abyss. Discussion Points. MRSA Treatment Guidelines

Surveillance for Antimicrobial Resistance and Preparation of an Enhanced Antibiogram at the Local Level. janet hindler

Medicinal Chemistry 561P. 2 st hour Examination. May 6, 2013 NAME: KEY. Good Luck!

Bacterial Pathogens in Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern from a Teaching Hospital, Bengaluru, India

ADC 2016 Report on Bacterial Resistance in Cultures from SEHOS and General Practitioners in Curaçao

OCTOBER 7-10 PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

EUCAST-and CLSI potency NEO-SENSITABS

Super Bugs and Wonder Drugs: Protecting the One While Respecting the Many

Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in the Province of British Columbia. August Epidemiology Services British Columbia Centre for Disease Control

* gender factor (male=1, female=0.85)

Transcription:

VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology Bugs and Drugs Elaine Dowell SM MLS (ASCP), Marti Roe SM MLS (ASCP), Sarah Parker MD, Jason Child PharmD, and Samuel R. Dominguez MD PhD Antibiogram Tables The 2013 Microbiology Laboratory antibiogram is also published within the Bugs and Drugs Handbook. Copies are available from Microbiology or Epidemiology (720-777-6412) and internally on the Pathology Webpage at: (http://prdplanetcf02.thechildrenshospital.org/apps/cm/files/21799.pdf). Items of importance from this year s data are highlighted here. With the exception of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, these changes reflect decreases in susceptibility for the organisms isolated in the CHCO microbiology laboratory. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia demonstrates an increase in trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole susceptibility. Our percentage matches the rate seen in other institutions nationwide. There is no increase in non-urine ESBL isolation; however a decrease in gentamicin susceptibility is noted among our isolates. Haemophilus influenzae isolates are more ampicillin resistant. Viridans streptococci are significantly more resistant to penicillin. S. anginosus demonstrates a shift to higher MICs with more intermediate interpretations reported. S. aureus susceptibility to clindamycin decreased by about 10% for both MSSA and MRSA. Isolation of VRE increased from one in previous year to five this past year. A footnote was added to Table 2 Indicating that non-meningeal S. pneumoniae infections may be treated with amoxicillin, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and cefuroxime. Rapid Blood Culture ID Panel (BCID) This spring, the Microbiology Lab implemented the BCID panel which is a multiplex PCR consisting of 8 gram positive targets, 11 gram negative targets, 5 yeast targets and 3 resistance mechanisms. When blood culture bottles arrive in the Microbiology Lab, they are placed on the Bactec blood culture analyzer and continuously monitored during their 5 day incubation. When the blood culture becomes positive, a Gram stain is performed and a phone call is made within 30 minutes to a physician caring for the patient to report the critical value in Microbiology. Then, the blood culture bottle is tested using the BCID panel. Within about an hour, results are reported with a second phone call to the clinician caring for the patient. In many cases, the organism will be definitively identified by BCID. In the case of an organism that is not represented on the panel, a report will be issued that indicates BCID organisms were not identified. In the case of mixed blood cultures, one organism may be detected and a second may not, yielding variable results. The test is kept in preliminary status until the traditional culture result is available. Occasionally, a corrected report may be issued when definitive culture results do not correlate with the BCID. The intent of performing and reporting the BCID is to allow the clinician the fastest results available, allowing for appropriate antimicrobial adjustments so that patients are treated appropriately in the best available time frame. Rapid reporting of organism identification holds the potential to bring savings to the institution through de-escalation of antimicrobials and avoiding readmission of patients with positive blood cultures deemed likely contaminants. VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 Page 1

Antimicrobial Stewardship Combines Forces with Microbiology Antimicrobial Stewardship works closely with the microbiology laboratory in an effort to improve patient care. The stewards work to decrease antibiotic pressure within CHCO, in order to decrease antimicrobial resistance, C. difficile infections and adverse drug events, and to improve antimicrobial dosing and efficacy. In order to harness maximal benefit from BCID, the second call described above may be placed by one of the antimicrobial stewards; the stewards will report the BCID result, and are available to field general questions on antimicrobial dose and choice. When highly resistant organisms occur, the stewards are available to help with optimal choice and dosing strategies. Sputum Sample Rejection Criteria Criteria for sputum sample rejection criteria are currently in place. When submitted for bacterial culture, sputa that contain >10 squamous epithelial cells observed per oil immersion field are rejected. This criteria was established by our accrediting agency and is a marker for oral flora contamination. Culture results from specimens that are heavily contaminated in this way are unreliable and will not be cultured. Specimens for Cystic Fibrosis Culture are exempt from this protocol by special request because they are surveillance cultures designed to isolate certain types of bacteria and results are not typically affected by normal oral flora contamination. 2013 Annual Antibiogram Tables 1-7 TABLE 1. Antimicrobial Susceptibilities at Children s Hospital Colorado 2013 Staphylococcus (% susceptible) TESTED Oxacillin* Trimethoprim / Sulfa Clindamycin Vancomycin Staph aureus (MSSA) 806 100 99 78 100 Staph aureus (MRSA) 478 R 99 69 100 Staph epidermidis 206 38 72 100 * Includes agents: Nafcillin/Dicloxacillin/Methicillin Oxacillin resistance predicts resistance to ALL beta-lactams (including penicillin, extended spectrum penicillins and cephalosporins (MRSA) Confirmation of MRSA by PBP2 or Microscan Panel Other antimicrobials tested by Microscan panels VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 Page 2

TABLE 2. Antimicrobial Susceptibilities at Children s Hospital Colorado 2013 Streptococcus (% susceptible) Penicillin Cefotaxime S I R S I R S. pneumoniae 1 Meningeal (2011-2013) (10) 60 40 90 10 100 S. pneumoniae 1 Non-meningeal 137 96 3 1 93 6 1 67 91 68 * 100 Viridans Strep 1 Group - Invasive 81 45 38 17 25 89 83 100 Strep. anginosus Group 1 - Invasive 41 85 13 2 80 88 95 100 Beta Strep Group A 1 Invasive (21) S 100 100 S Beta Strep Group B 1 (10) S 2 S Beta Strep Group B 1 (prenatal screens) 505 S 51 57 100 Enterococcus faecalis 2 145 100 100 Enterococcus faecium 2 54 56 100 Vanc Resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE) ** 5 R R 1 Testing by E-test. Testing by Microscan panel. ( ) = small numbers S = Always susceptible to penicillin, ampicillin and cephalexin. **Five new VRE patient identified in 2013 for therapy choices, ID consult recommended. * S. pneumoniae isolates that are susceptible to penicillin are also susceptible to ampicillin. S. pneumoniae infections may be treated with amoxicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefepime. Cefotaxime susceptibility does not imply susceptibility to oral cephalosporins. Gentamicin Synergy Screen E. faecalis = 94% Susceptible Gentamicin Synergy Screen E. faecium = 91% Susceptible Gentamicin Synergy Screens on VRE isolates show 100% Susceptible at CHCO Combination therapy should be used in serious Enterococcus spp. infection (endocarditis & bacteremia). Gentamicin synergy screen predicts synergy of aminoglycosides with cell wall active agents. Erythromycin Clindamycin Trimethoprim/Sulfa Cefotaxime Ampicillin/ Amoxicillin Vancomycin VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 Page 3

TABLE 3. Antimicrobial Susceptibilities at Children s Hospital Colorado 2013 Gram Negative Organisms, non urine (% susceptible) Ampicillin / Amoxicillin Cefazolin Cefotaxime/ Ceftriaxone Gentamicin Trimethoprim / sulfa Ciprofloxacin Meropenem Cefepime Haemophilus species (29) 21 100 69 E. coli 89 43 93 98 91 65 90 100 100 Enterobacter cloacae 48 R R 90 100 88 96 100 100 Klebsiella pneumoniae 42 R 100 100 100 83 100 100 100 Klebsiella oxytoca (24) R 75 100 100 83 92 100 100 Serratia marcescens (20) R R 100 100 85 85 95 100 Citrobacter freundii 35 R R 84 96 84 100 100 100 Salmonella species 54 85 96 96 Shigella species* (25) 70 100 70 ( ) = small numbers * = Data combined 2012 2013 R = Resistant (Intrinsic) Haemophilus spp. tested by E-test. All other testing by Microscan panel. 5 non-urine ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae were isolated not included in above data. VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 Page 4

TABLE 4. Antimicrobial Susceptibilities at Children s Hospital Colorado 2013 Gram Negative Organisms isolated from Urine (% susceptible) Ampicillin / Amoxicillin Ampicillin/Sulbactam Cephalothin** Cefuroxime Cefotaxime/ Ceftriaxone Gentamicin Nitrofurantoin Trimethoprim / sulfa Ciprofloxacin Ceftazidime Levofloxacin Cefepime E. coli 1290 55 60 74 99 99 94 99 73 94 E. coli ESBL* (23) R 4 R R R 65 100 39 30 R R Enterobacter cloacae 39 R R R 33 64 97 44 82 100 Klebsiella pneumoniae 104 R R 90 91 100 98 63 88 95 Klebsiella oxytoca 35 R R 74 89 100 100 97 91 100 Proteus mirabilis 60 87 95 95 97 98 92 R 83 97 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 49 61 76 65 76 ( ) Small number of isolates R = Resistant (Intrinsic) Testing by Microscan panel **Cephalothin results can be used as a surrogate to predict susceptibility to the oral cephalosporin agents: cefdinir, cefpodoxime, cephalexin. *Note: Patients with ESBL producing organisms isolated from urine who have uncomplicated UTI may respond to therapy with beta-lactam agents. VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 Page 5

TABLE 5. Antimicrobial Susceptibilities at The Children s Hospital 2013 Non-Enterobacteriaceae (% susceptible) Ticarcillin/clavulanic acid Ceftazidime Aztreonam Levofloxacin Tobramycin Meropenem Piperacillin / Tazobactam Minocycline Trimethoprim / Sulfa Ciprofloxacin Gentamicin Cefepime Pseudomonas aeruginosa Non CF 2 149 95 83 95 97 89 74 86 CF-mucoid 1 32 81 78 66 75 84 76 CF-nonmucoid 1 44 75 77 70 73 75 77 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 1 65 18 17 49 R 92 96 1 2 Cystic fibrosis (CF) isolates performed by E-test. Non-CF testing performed by Microscan panel. VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 Page 6

TABLE 6. Antimicrobial Susceptibilities at Children s Hospital Colorado 2013 Candida species (# of isolates susceptible) Antifungal # Tested # Susceptible # SDD # Resistant Amphotericin 13 13 Micafungin 13 13 Fluconazole 12 12 Voriconazole 13 13 Testing performed by UTHSC at San Antonio Fluconazole comments: SDD - Susceptible Dose Dependent C. glabrata treatment with fluconazole requires maximum dosages when the MIC is < 32 ug/mll, ID consult is recommended. *C. krusei is intrinsically resistant to fluconazole (isolates not tested). Candida spp. isolates included in data: (12 blood isolates) C. albicans 4 C. parapsilosis 5 C. lusitaniae - 2 C. krusei - 0 C. glabrata - 1 C. tropicalis 1 VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 Page 7

Table 7. Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Report for Anaerobic Organisms Isolates collected from US hospitals January 1, 2007 December 31, 2009 ANAEROBIC Ampicillin-sulbactam (Unasyn) Piperacillin/tazobactam (Zosyn) Cefoxitin Ertapenem Meropenem Penicillin/ampicillin Clindamycin Metronidazole Percent Susceptible (%S) and %S %R %S %R %S %R %S %R %S %R %S %R %S %R %S %R Percent Resistant (%R) Fusobacterium nucleatum- 44 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 * 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 necrophorum Anaerobic gram- positive 168 98 1 100 0 100 0 100 0 * 0 96 3 78 20 98 1 cocci P. acnes 34 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 * 0 100 0 91 3 3 97 B. fragilis group 1580 86 4 95 2 65 9 97 1 98 1 50 39 100 0 *% S for meropenem is not reported due to lack of data and breakpoints are not well established. Data adapted from CLSI M100-S23 January 2013. VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 Page 8

We are modifying our distribution process for Contagious Comments. If you wish to receive this publication please provide us with your E mail address below. Name: E mail Address: Both the Contagious Comments and Bug Watch publications are always posted on Children s Hospital Colorado website at: http://www.childrenscolorado.org/news/publications/index.aspx Please return your E mail address to: Carolyn Brock, Children s Hospital Colorado, Epidemiology Box B276, 13123 E. 16 th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045 or E mail address: carolyn.brock@childrenscolorado.org. Thank you for your interest in our publication. CONTAGIOUS COMMENTS Department of Epidemiology EDITOR: Carolyn Brock, Program Assistant Children s Hospital Colorado, Dept. of Epidemiology, B 276 13123 E. 16th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045 Phone: (720) 777 6412; FAX: (720) 777 7295 carolyn.brock@childrenscolorado.org www.childrenscolorado.org ** We Recycle! ** VOLUME XXIX NUMBER 3 November 2014 Page 9