POPULATION DYNAMICS OF BREEDING SOUTH POLAR SKUAS OF UNKNOWN AGE ROBERT C. WOOD

Similar documents
1. Adélie Penguins can mate for life or at least try to find the same mate every year.

TIMING OF NEST RELIEF AND ITS EFFECT ON BREEDING SUCCESS IN ADELIE PENGUINS (PYGOSCELIS ADELIAE)

ACTIVITY PATTERNS AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR OF NON-BREEDING ADkLIE PENGUINS

3. Chicks weigh 86 grams when they hatch and gain 100 grams a day until they are about 50 days old when they are ready to take care of itself.

Demography and breeding success of Falklands skua at Sea Lion Island, Falkland Islands

Adélie Penguin Bird Count

AGE AT FIRST BREEDING AND CHANGE IN PLUMAGE OF KELP GULLS LARUS DOMINICANUS IN SOUTH AFRICA. R. J. M. CRAWFORD*, B. M. DYER* and L.

The South Polar Skua (Catharacta maccormicki) A study of past research and future opportunity

BEHAVIOR OF THE ADkLIE PENGUIN CHICK

DO DIFFERENT CLUTCH SIZES OF THE TREE SWALLOW (Tachycineta bicolor)

EXERCISE 14 Marine Birds at Sea World Name

THE BLUE PENGUIN (Eudyptula minor) AT TAIAROA HEAD, OTAGO,

BROOD REDUCTION IN THE CURVE-BILLED THRASHER By ROBERTE.RICKLEFS

COMMISSION FOR THE CONSERVATION OF ANTARCTIC MARINE LIVING RESOURCES

PROBABLE NON-BREEDERS AMONG FEMALE BLUE GROUSE

(199) THE HATCHING AND FLEDGING OF SOME COOT

Breeding Activity Peak Period Range Duration (days) Laying May May 2 to 26. Incubation Early May to mid June Early May to mid June 30 to 34

6 Month Progress Report. Cape vulture captive breeding and release programme Magaliesberg Mountains, South Africa. VulPro NPO

Tristan Darwin Project. Monitoring Guide. A Guide to Monitoring Albatross, Penguin and Seal Plots on Tristan and Nightingale

Intraspecific relationships extra questions and answers (Extension material for Level 3 Biology Study Guide, ISBN , page 153)

Analysis of Nest Record Cards for the Buzzard

Multiple broods from a hole in the wall: breeding Red-and-yellow Barbets Trachyphonus erythrocephalus in southeast Sudan

SEASONAL PATTERNS OF NESTING IN THE RED-WINGED BLACKBIRD MORTALITY

CARCASSES OF ADELIE PENGUINS AS A FOOD SOURCE FOR SOUTH POLAR SKUAS: SOME PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS

Summary of 2017 Field Season

BREEDING ECOLOGY OF THE LITTLE TERN, STERNA ALBIFRONS PALLAS, 1764 IN SINGAPORE

The Recent Nesting History of the Bald Eagle in Rondeau Provincial Park, Ontario.

Osprey Watch Osprey Monitoring Guidelines

THE BREEDING BIOLOGY OF LEACH'S PETREL, OCEANODROMA LEUCORHOA HENRY M. WILBUR

For further information on the biology and ecology of this species, Clarke (1995) provides a comprehensive account.

PROTECTING MANLY S PENGUINS

EFFECTS OF THE WATER-OFFLOADING TECHNIQUE. GRAHAM ROBERTSON, SHARON KENT, AND JULIAN SEDDON Australia n Antarctic Division

Chapter 7 Breeding and Natal Dispersal, Nest Habitat Loss and Implications for Marbled Murrelet Populations

The Long-term Effect of Precipitation on the Breeding Success of Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos homeyeri in the Judean and Negev Deserts, Israel

Falkland Island Seabird Monitoring Programme Annual Report 2007/2008

PENGUIN AND SOME OTHER PENGUINS. A. E. Bu}mE} AND A. J. WILLIAMS

pasture and gray birch and white pine woods adjoin on the north,

GNARALOO TURTLE CONSERVATION PROGRAM 2011/12 GNARALOO CAPE FARQUHAR ROOKERY REPORT ON FINAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY (21 23 FEBRUARY 2012)

Motuora island reptile monitoring report for common & Pacific gecko 2016

C OLONIAL sea birds are characteristically long lived once they have fledged,

Breeding White Storks( Ciconia ciconia at Chessington World of Adventures Paul Wexler

Emperor Penguin. Emperor Penguin : Assembly Instructions. Papercraft Mini-book / Assembly Instructions. Canon is a registered trademark of Canon Inc.

What is the date at which most chicks would have been expected to fledge?

Co-operative breeding by Long-tailed Tits

Temperature Gradient in the Egg-Laying Activities of the Queen Bee

The behaviour of a pair of House Sparrows while rearing young

Injuries of Webs on the Feet of South Polar Skuas Catharacta Maccormicki: Results of Studying Active Obliged Aggregations

The Peregrine Falcon. BY: Alicia Saichareune

BLUEBIRD NEST BOX REPORT

Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus) Productivity and Home Range Characteristics in a Shortgrass Prairie. Rosemary A. Frank and R.

Physical Description Meadow voles are small rodents with legs and tails, bodies, and ears.

King penguin brooding and defending a sub-antarctic skua chick

Pikas. Pikas, who live in rocky mountaintops, are not known to move across non-rocky areas or to

(135) OBSERVATIONS IN A ROOKERY DURING THE INCUBATION PERIOD C. M. OGILVIE.

Wilson Bull., 103(4), 199 1, pp

BLACK OYSTERCATCHER NEST MONITORING PROTOCOL

By Hans Frey ¹ ² & Alex Llopis ²

Breeding Activity Peak Period Range Duration (days) Egg laying Early April Mid-March to early May 3 to 12

Adélie Penguin Family Life Cycle

The Power of Observation Webcam technology helps students investigate the wonder of Adélie penguin breeding near Palmer Station, Antarctica

Great Blue Heron Chick Development. Through the Stages

DRAFT Bell et al (POP2012/03: Black Petrels)

Thefirst attempt at Brood Manipulation of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos in Japan

Adjustments In Parental Care By The European Starling (Sturnus Vulgaris): The Effect Of Female Condition

Polar Biol (1994) 14: Springer-Verlag 1994

Key concepts of Article 7(4): Version 2008

Similipal Tiger Reserve, Baripada, Orissa

Red Crowned Parakeet (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae) health, disease and nesting study on Tiritiri Matangi 2014/2015. Emma Wells on behalf of

BEHAVIOR AND NESTING SUCCESS RELATIVE TO NEST LOCATION IN ADSLIE PENGUINS (PYGOSCELIS ADELIAE)

376 BRITISH BIRDS. [VOL. xu.

Tuning a nose to forage: Evidence for olfactory learning in a procellariiform seabird chicks

Aggressiveness in king penguins in relation to reproductive status and territory location

Post Point Heron Colony

T HE recent and interesting paper by Alexander F. Skutch (1962) stimulated

Short Report Key-site monitoring on Hornøya in Rob Barrett & Kjell Einar Erikstad

Birds of the Palmer Station area

Pairing and breeding o f Mute Swans

OBSERVATIONS OF HAWAIIAN

Factors Influencing Local Recruitment in Tree Swallows, Tachycineta bicolor

Ernst Rupp and Esteban Garrido Grupo Jaragua El Vergel #33, Santo Domingo Dominican Republic

Breeding Activity Peak Period Range Duration (days) Site occupation and territorial display Early April Mid-March to early May

Population dynamics of small game. Pekka Helle Natural Resources Institute Finland Luke Oulu

DAILY NEST ATTENDANCE AND BREEDING PERFORMANCE IN THE LITTLE PENGUIN EUDYPTULA MINOR AT PHILLIP ISLAND, AUSTRALIA

Bell et al (POP2013/04: Black Petrels) 1 Wildlife Management International Limited, PO Box 607, Blenheim 7240, New Zealand,

Rock Wren Nesting in an Artificial Rock Wall in Folsom, Sacramento County, California

Survivorship. Demography and Populations. Avian life history patterns. Extremes of avian life history patterns

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

CHINSTRAP PENGUIN (PYGOSCELI$ ANTARCTICA): A FIELD EXPERIMENT

The story of Solo the Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge Male Swan

OBSERVATIONS ON SWALLOWS AND HOUSE- MARTINS AT THE NEST. BY

( 162 ) SOME BREEDING-HABITS OF THE LAPWING.

Afring News. An electronic journal published by SAFRING, Animal Demography Unit at the University of Cape Town

Thurs Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Weds 7/9 7/10 7/11 7/12 7/13 7/14 7/15

RE-INTRODUCTION OF THE ORIENTAL PIED HORNBILL IN SINGAPORE, WITH EMPHASIS ON ARTIFICIAL NESTS

Cape Hatteras National Seashore Resource Management Field Summary for July 15 July 21, 2010 (Bodie, Hatteras and Ocracoke Districts)

Removal of Alaskan Bald Eagles for Translocation to Other States Michael J. Jacobson U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, Juneau, AK

Short Report Key-site monitoring on Hornøya in Rob Barrett & Kjell Einar Erikstad

When am I going to return to normal? Percy Penguin asked His mother. What are you talking about, my dear? Our feathers!! We are shedding them all over

Pup 61 within seconds of being born in South Haven, 22 September 2012

Fun Penguin Facts. Instructions. All About Reading Extension Ideas: All About Spelling Extension Ideas:

Transcription:

POPULATION DYNAMICS OF BREEDING SOUTH POLAR SKUAS OF UNKNOWN AGE ROBERT C. WOOD SEVm At. authors have presented data and discussed various aspects of population dynamics of the two most southerly breeding forms of Catharacta, the South Polar Skua (C. maccormicki) (Eklund, 1961; Young, 1963; LeMorvan et al., 1967; Pryor, 1968) and the Brown Skua (C. skua lonnbergi) (Stonehouse, 1956; Burton, 1968; Purchase, in Carrick and Ingham, 1970). These studies have been either of short duration, based on few breeding pairs, or both. Breeding success in the extreme antarctic environment varies highly from year to year and also considerably within a region of dissimilar topography. Survival is less variable, but a large population must be studied to obtain accurate figures. This study of individually marked skuas of unknown age took place at Cape Crozier (77 ø 27' S, 169 ø 14' E) on Ross Island, Antarctica during eight consecutive breeding seasons (November through February) beginning in 1961. It forms a base line for current studies on breeding skuas of known age. The South Polar Skua population at Cape Crozier consists of 950 to 1,000 pairs of breeding birds and an estimated 200 to 400 nonbreeders. Approximately 80 per cent of each group was banded. Six discrete breeding areas are dispersed along the inland periphery of a rookery of 175,000 pairs of Ad lie Penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) (Emison, 1968). One breeding area of approximately 11 hectares (27 acres) was chosen at the beginning of the study for its relative freedom from human disturbance and for its isolation from other skua breeding areas. Topography varied from nearly level to a slope of 42 per cent. During 5 consecutive years of the study the mean number of breeding pairs was 110 (Table 4); 94 per cent of the breeders were banded and of these 55 per cent were sexed by copulatory position and/or by courtship feeding (Young, 1963). Breeding skuas on their territories were caught with a hand net when they dived at the observer's head (Austin, 1957). Breeding skuas away from their territories and nonbreeders were baited and noosed. The only banding casualty was a bird whose wing was broken when it was netted. Three types of bands were used. All captured skuas were given a 25-mm (1 inch) tall aluminum band with the serial number imprinted vertically on two opposite sides of the band to facilitate reading with binoculars or spotting scope (Sladen, Wood, and Monaghan, 1968). This band was placed on the right tarsus of adult skuas and on the left 805 The Auk, 88: 805-814. October 1971

8O6 ROBERT C. WOOD [Auk, Vol. 88 MINI/ ium TABLE 1 DISTANCES BETWEEN ADJACENT NEST SITES IN ONE SEASON Distance (m) Number of nests Per cent 1-10 15 14 11-20 58 53 21-30 25 23 31-40 9 8 41-50 1 1 51-60 1 1 Range 4-53 meters, mean 19 meters. tarsus of nestlings in conformance with recommendations of the Subcommittee on Antarctic Bird Banding of the international Scientific Committee for Antarctic Research. As part of a continent-wide scheme of area colors, a 10-mm tall yellow plastic band was put on the left tarsus of breeding adults to denote the Ross Sea sector of Antarctica. A 9-mm tall band of nickel alloy was placed below the yellow band on the left tarsus of study area breeders to distinguish them from other Crozier breeders. This band bore a three digit number imprinted three times in a horizontal position which further assisted in easy identification of individual skuas. The possibility of band loss must be considered in any study of long duration that depends on individually marked birds. The speciallydesigned skua band, being 25 mm tall, is inherently stronger than the standard 11-mm band issued by the Fish and Wildlife Service. Very few bands were seen that had opened as much as 1 mm. These were replaced, as were nearly all original bands as the band design was improved. The two supplementary bands were a further check against band loss. Almost all breeding skuas in the study area were marked with yellow plastic bands, and about half were marked with nickel alloy bands. As none of these birds was seen without the tall band on the right tarsus, band loss during this study is assumed to be negligible. PAIR BOND Breeding skuas apparently do not remain paired during the winter, as single birds were seen reoccupying territories at the start of the breeding season. In early November, approximately 2 weeks after the first arrival and just prior to a rapid increase in numbers that coincided with the peak of laying in the Addlie Penguin rookery, partial counts showed 16 skuas paired (8 pairs) and 29 unpaired. Some of the latter were probably paired and their mates were away foraging. Of the unpaired birds whose sex was known, 10 were males and 2 were females, suggesting that males usually return to the breeding territory before

October 1971] Skua Population Dynamics 8O7 TABLE 2 CtIANGES IN NEST SITES OF 47 PAroS OF SKIJAS IN Two CONSECUTIVE SEASONS Distance moved (m) Number of pairs Per cent 0--5 232 49 6-10 12 25 11-15 6 13 Over 15 6 13 Range 0-51 meters, mean 7.6 meters. 14 pairs re-occupied the same nest site. females. Burton (1968) reported that in the Brown Skua successful breeders left the area several days apart at the end of the breeding season. Skua pairs normally reunited each breeding season unless one bird failed to return. Thus of 267 pairs that were recorded in 2 consecutive seasons, only 4 pairs (1.5%) did not reunite. Five of these eight individuals found new mates the first year, one remained unpaired until the second year, and two were not seen again after the year of separation. Skuas were prompt in replacing lost mates. In 27 pairs in which one bird failed to return, all survivors but one paired again the first year and produced eggs either the first or second years. Eighteen (67%) survivors paired with skuas that were unbanded, suggesting that the latter were breeding for the first time. Four survivors combined to form two pairs, four paired with skuas that had separated from their previous mates, and one paired with a skua that had previously bred outside the study area. The ease with which skuas acquired new mates did not mean that they immediately became effective members of the breeding population, as will be shown in the discussion. SITE TENACITY Skuas show a high degree of site tenacity, breeding in the same territory year after year and often in the same nest scoop. Territorial boundaries were not plotted; data are based on the relative nest positions of adjacent pairs. In one season the mean distance between each of 109 nests and its nearest neighbor was 19 m (Table 1). The mean distance that 47 pairs moved from one season to the next was 7.6 m (Table 2), 14 (30%) of these pairs using the same nest scoops both years. Of 312 pairs that bred together in two consecutive seasons, only 4 pairs (1.3%) moved far enough to change the previous relationship of adjacent pairs (Table 3). These four moves averaged 32 m, almost twice the mean minimum distance between nests. When a pair was broken by the disappearance of one bird, the survivor rarely moved farther than to an adjoining territory. Of 27 such

8O8 ROSEaT C. Wood [Auk, Vol. 88 TABLE 3 CtIANGES II RELATIVE NEST POSITIOI OF ADJACEI T BREEDING ])AIRS 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67 Total Number of pairs that 67 76 87 82 312 had bred together for 2 or more consecutive years Number of changes 2 1 0 1 4 in relative position of nest site survivors, 23 (85%) remained on their territories, including 3 that used the same nest scoops, while 3 moved to adjoining territories and only 1 moved farther. This skua was not recorded for two seasons and then was found breeding two territories away, a distance of approximately 35 m. Changes were too infrequent to be correlated with the bird's sex. Because site changes within the study area were limited almost entirely to adjacent territories it is not surprising that changes between breeding areas at Crozier were very infrequent. Emigration from the study area was detectable by the supplementary metal bands put on about half the breeders. One instance of emigration was found, a movement of about 1,500 m. The bird's sex was unknown but it had bred for the previous 4 years, the last 2 with the same mate. The mate remained on the original territory, alone. Two females moved into the study area from distances of approximately 1,000 m. Their original mates were banded but were not recorded after the change. Breeding changes of greater distance were very rare. Approximately 1,800 Crozier breeders were marked with the distinctive yellow plastic band; only one such breeder was found during searches of all known breeding areas within 160 km of Crozier. This skua had moved 71 km to Cape Evans on the opposite side of Ross Island. It had bred at Crozier in 1962-63 and was found breeding at Cape Evans in 1967-68. It was not seen during the intervening four seasons. Immigration to Crozier was virtually impossible to detect as so few breeding skuas had been banded elsewhere. These four movements demonstrate that skuas occasionally change breeding areas and that a missing breeder may not be dead. However the very small number of such moves makes this factor negligible in determining survival. Because two of the four skuas involved in these changes moved from territories near the hut and helicopter landing area, it is possible they were influenced by human activity, yet the number of breeding skuas in this area changed only slightly in 5 years, from 71 to 67 pairs. This fluctuation is no greater than was recorded in the study area (Table 4).

October 1971] Skua Population Dynamics 809 TABLE 4 BREEDINC, S rccess IX CAPE CROZIER STLrD¾ AREA Breeding Fledged Fledged chicks End of Year pairs chicks per breeding pair observations 1961-62 110 45 0.41 22 February 1962-63 121 73 0.60 2 March 1963-64 111 46 0.41 28 February 1964-65 107 33 0.31 19 February 1965-66 112 19 0.17 22 February 1966-67 98 12 0.12 18 February 1967-68 110 14 0.13 14 February 1968-69 110 53 0.48 16 February TOTALS 879 295 a 110 is the mean number of breeding p rs from 1962-63 to 1966-67. Counts were not made in 1961-62, 1967-68, and 1968-69 BREEDING SUCCESS Table 4 shows the breeding success of skuas in the Cape Crozier study area. Figures are based on the ratio of fledged chicks per breeding pair, the most meaningful measure of productivity for the study because some pairs did not lay a full clutch of two eggs. A successfully fledged chick is one banded up to 3 weeks before fledging (chicks could not be banded at an earlier age because of the height of the band) and which was not found dead at a later date. Of 1,445 chicks banded in all breeding areas at Crozier, 74 (5%) were found dead the same or following season. Corpses were not difficult to find because of the absence of vegetation. Undoubtedly some were overlooked or were blown into the sea during storms, and certainly an occasional pair of skuas produced and lost its eggs before being recorded as a breeding pair. Including these small but unknown quantities would make skua productivity somewhat lower. Annual breeding success varied fivefold over the 8-year period, from a minimum of 0.12 chicks per breeding pair to a maximum of 0.60 chicks. The mean was 0.34 per breeding pair. This wide range in annual productivity emphasizes the. need for data from several breeding seasons. The figures for breeding success given in Table 5 for Haswell Island, Windmill Islands, and Geologie Archipelago are much higher than those for Crozier, Cape Hallett, and Cape Royds. This is probably due more to observations being concluded before chicks were fledged than to a much higher productivity. Observations ended at Haswell Island on 5 January (Pryor, 1968) and at Windmill Islands in "the last week of January" (Eklund, 1961). Some of the least productive years at Crozier were caused by heavy losses of chicks during blizzards in late January when winds reached velocities of 60 to 100 mph for periods up to several days. Small, late-hatched chicks suffered proportionately higher losses

810 ROBERT C. WOOD [Auk, Vol. 88 TABLE 5 COMPARISON O]Y BREEDING SUCCESS IN SOIITtt POLAR AND BROWN SKIIAS Breeding Breeding Chicks Chicks Location seasons pairs fledged per pair Reference South Polar Skua Cape Crozier 8 879 295 0.34 This study Cape Hallett 3 472 204 0.43 Reid (MS) Cape Royds 1 67 31 0.46 Young, 1963 Haswell Island 1 23 18 0.78 Pryor, 1968 Geologie 4 66 75 1.13 LeMorvan et Archipelago al, 1967; Isenmann (pets. comm.) Windmill Islands 1 40 34 0.85 Eklund, 1961 Brown Skua Macquarie Island 1 40 46 1.15 Purchase, in Carrick and Signy Island 3 65 77 1.18 Ingham, 1970 Burton, 1968 South Georgia 2 6 6 1.00 Stonehouse, 1956 t Not all chicks were known to fledge as observations were concluded on varying dates: Cape Crozier, see Table 4; Cape Hallerr, 23 Jan. (2 years) and 5 Feb.; Cape Royds, 23 Feb.; Haswell Island, 5 Jan.; Windmill Islands, last week of January; Signy Island, end of breeding season. of up to 75 per cent, apparently from exposure and from the inability of parents to forage normally. Accurate, comparable figures on breeding successhould be based on data gathered through at least the middle of February with subsequent searches for late casualties. Young (1963) noted that breeding success of South Polar Skuas at Cape Royds was lower than that of Great Skuas (C. s. skua) in the Shetland Islands. He postulated that this was partly due to the South Polar Skua's smaller territories from which second chicks were often driven by their older siblings during times of food shortage. The same relationship appears to be valid between South Polar Skuas at Crozier and Brown Skuas at Signy Island in the South Orkney Islands (Burton, 1968). Annual breeding success at Cape Crozier averaged 0.34 chicks for 8 years while at Signy Island the 3-year average was 1.18 chicks (Table 5). The mean minimum distance between nests in one season at Crozier was 19 m (Table 1) while at Signy Island it was approximately 190 m. Burton did not specify the number of Brown Skua pairs that successfully fledged two chicks, but the number falls between 14 (22%) and 38 (58%) of the 65 successful pairs in three breeding seasons. In five seasons at Crozier 15 (9%) of 168 successful pairs fledged both chicks. This percentage varied little from year to year. Table 5 shows the great difference in productivity between South Polar

October 1971] Skua Population Dynamics 811 TABLE 6 SURVIVAL OF SKIJAS VITH BREEDING EXPERIENCE Skuas with Number returning Per cent Year breeding experience following year survival 1961-62 35 33 94 1962-63 208 194 93 1963-64 222 202 91 1964-65 232 225 97 ToT^LS 697 654 mean 93.8 Includes 18 skuas that were not observed until the second year. and Brown Skuas. In 18 seasons at 6 locations on the antarctic coast, South Polar Skuas fledged 0.42 chicks per breeding pair, while in 6 seasons on 3 subantarctic islands Brown Skuas produced 1.16 chicks per pair. The incidence of successful two chick broods is much higher in the Brown Skua. The correlation of territory size to breeding success is obvious; it may b.e but o.ne o.f several factors affecting skua productivity. Ar)ux.T Sul wv^x. Very few adult skuas die at Crozier. Over a 7-year period an average of eight dead skuas was found each season, an annual loss of less than 0.4 per cent of the breeding population (not all deaths were of known breeders). Most mortality, then, occurs during the nonbreeding season, March through October, when the skua is a pelagic wanderer. This mortality is readily measurable because of the skua's strong attachmento its nest site. With very few exceptions, a skua that is missing from the vicinity of its previous breeding site can be assumed to be dead. As noted earlier, changes in breeding site were infrequent and could be recognized by the distinctive nickel alloy band put on about half of the breeders in the study area. Each year several skuas were not noted but were recorded the following season. These birds, whether actually missing throughout the season or not present regularly enough to be recorded, are considered as present in calculating survival. The mean annual survival rate of skuas with breeding experience was 93.8 per cent, the annual rate varying over a 4-year period from 91-97 per cent (Table 6). This is one of the highest rates to be reported for any avian species and is comparable with survival rates of several of the larger Procellariiformes as summarized by Hudson (1966). That this high survival rate is not correlated with an expanding population is shown in Table 4 where the number of breeding pairs is relatively stable or, at most, declining slightly. No sex difference is apparent in survival; just half of the 32 skuas of known sex that disappeared were males.

812 ROBERT C. WOOD [Auk, Vol. 88 TABLE 7 BREEDING SUCCESS IN RELATION TO LENGTt{ OF PAIR BOND Length of Successful Per cent of pair bond Pairs pairs successful pai New pairs 36 2 6 Established pai 266 53 20 DISCUSSION Length of pair bond and breeding success are closely correlated (Table 7). Of 36 pairs of skuas that bred together for the first time (new pairs), only two (6%) were successful, although at least 23 birds had bred in a previous year with other mates. Chicks were fledged by 53 (20%) of 266 pairs that had bred together for a minimum of two seasons (established pairs). The majority (69%) of new pairs laid their eggs during the last one-third of the egg-laying period (Table 8), but the percentage of successful pairs laying in that period was only one quarter that of the earlier layers (Table 9). The process of pair formation in the aggressive, strongly territorial skua apparently may delay laying beyond the deadline for successful breeding in the short antarctic summer. Thus one of the criteria for successful breeding is not previous experience per s½, but previous experience together. When adult skua mortality data are applied to Lack's (1954: 93) formula for determining mean adult life expectancy, (2-m)/2m, where m = per cent of annual mortality, we find that Crozier skuas have a breeding span of approximately 15.6 years. A breeding success of 0.34 chicks per pair results in the average skua pair producing 5.3 fledglings during its lifetime. Only two of these fledglings need survive to breeding age, a survival rate of 38 per cent, to keep the Crozier population stable, provided there is no appreciable imbalance between emigration of Crozierreared skuas to. other colonies or immigration from other sites. So far we have little data concerning dispersal of skuas whose natal areas are known. Pryor (1968) reported two South Polar Skuas breeding at Haswell Island that had been banded as nestlings at the Windmill Islands (Wilkes Station), 800 km away. A Hallerr skua was found breeding at Cape Crozier (Sladen, LeResche, and Wood, 1968), 565 km distant, and another at Cape Evans (LeResche et al., 1970), 580 km away. The only known Crozier-reared emigrant is a skua seen breeding at Cape Evans, a distance of 71 km (LeResch et al., 1970). Skua studies at Crozier show a breeding success rate of 0.34 fledglings per breeding pair, a 93.8 per cent survival during adult life, and a pro-

October 1971] Skua Population Dynamics 813 TABLE 8 TIME OF moo LAYING IN RELATION TO LENGTIt OF PAll Bow Time of laying Established pairs New pairs Number per cent Number per cent 17 November to 17 December 156 59 11 31 18 December to 31 December 110 41 25 69 jected 38 per cent survival from fledging to breeding age. The latter figure, as well as the mean age of first breeding, will be determined in present studies of eight age groups of South Polar Skuas. ACKNO%VLEDG! ENTS I wish to thank P. Isenmann and B. Reid for permitting me to use their unpublished data and D. Ainley, F. Kinsky, R. LeResche, R. Schlatter and W. J. L. S]aden for helpful criticisms of this manuscript. This study was a part of the USARP (U.S. Antarctic Research Program) Bird Banding and Antarctic Avian Population Studies Programs, supported by various grants to W. J. L. Sladen from the Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation. SUNI1VIAR¾ The population dynamics of about 110 breeding pairs of individually marked South Polar Skuas of unknown age were studied at Cape Crozier on Ross Island, Antarctica, over eight consecutive breeding seasons. Skua pairs maintained their pair bond from year to year unless one bird failed to return, and reoccupied the previous territory. This strong attachment to mate and territory permitted observation of a large number of skuas over successive years. Breeding success averaged 0.34 fledglings per breeding pair for 5 years. The annual rate varied widely from 0.12 to 0.60 chicks. Higher breeding successes reported elsewhere may have resulted from observations being concluded before chicks were fully fledged. The wider disparity of TABLE 9 BREEDING SUCCESS IN RELATION TO TIME OF EGG LAYING Per cent of Time of laying Breeding pairs Successful pairs successful pairs 17 November to 17 December 167 46 28 18 December to 31 December 135 9 7

814 ROBERT C. Woot) [Auk, Vol. 88 success between South Polar Skuas and Brown Skuas is partly due to the latter's larger breeding territories where two chicks are often fledged. Length of pair bond and breeding success were closely correlated. The low rate of success of 36 pairs without previous experience together, 69 per cent of which laid eggs during the latter third of the 6-week laying period, suggested that behavioral difficulties in pair formation were partly responsible. The annual survival of adult skuas with breeding experience averaged 93.8 per cent for 4 years, the highest year being 97 per cent. There was no difference in survival of males and females. LITERATIYRE CtTED AL;STIN, O. L., JR. 1957. Notes on banding birds in Antarctica, and on the Ad lie Penguin colonies of the Ross Sea Sector. Bird-Banding, 27: 1-26. B YRTON, R. W. 1968. Breeding biology of the Brown Skua, Catharacta skua lonnbergi (Mathews), at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Brit. Antarctic Surv. Bull., No. 15: 9-28. CARRm, R., ANt) S. INOI A. 1970. Ecology and population dynamics of antarctic sea birds. Pp. 505-525 in Antarctic ecology, vol. 1 (M. Holdgate, Ed.). London, Academic Press. EKLL;Nt), C.R. 1961. Distribution and life history studies of the South Polar Skua. Bird-Banding, 32: 187--223. E son, V. B. 1968. Feeding preferences of the AdObe Penguin at Cape Crozier, Ross Island, Antarctica. Antarctic Res. Ser., 12: 191-212. Ht t)son, R. 1966. Adult survival estimates for two antarctic petrels. Brit. Antarctic Surv. Bull., No. 8: 63-73. LAC, D. 1954. The natural regulation of animal numbers. Oxford, Clarendon Press. LEMoRvAN, P., J. MOLmlN, ANt) J. PREVOST. 1967. Ecologie du skua antartique (Stercorarius skua Mac½ormicki) dans l'archipel de Pointe Geologie (Terre Adelie). Oiseau, 37: 193-229. LERESCHE, R. E., R. C. WOOt), AND W. J. L. SLADEN. 1970. Antarctic avian population studies, 1968-1969. Antarctic J. U.S., 5: 46-49. PRYOR, M. S. 1968. The avifauna of Haswell Island, Antarctica. Antarctic Res. Ser., 12: 57-82. SLADEN, W. J. L., R. E. LERESCHE, ANt) R. C. Woot). 1968. Antarctic avian population studies, 1967-1968. Antarctic J. U.S., 3: 247-249. SL^t)EN, W. J. L., R. C. Woot), ^Nt) E. P. MON^On^N. 1968. The USARP bird banding program 1958-1965. Antarctic Res. Ser., 12: 213-262. STONEnOrSE, B. 1956. The Brown Skua of South Georgia. Falkland Islands Dependencies Surv., Sci. Rept. No. 14. YouNo, E. C. 1963. The breeding behaviour of the South Polar Skua. Ibis, 105: 203-233. Department of Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205. Present address: Maryland Academy of Sciences, 7 West Mulberry Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. Accepted 16 June 1970.