(From the Department of Bacteriology, Hoagland Laboratory, Brooklyn)

Similar documents
TEAT DIP- POST DIP- PRE DIP- STRIPING

loopfull is removed from each dilution and transferred to capable of killing the test organism in 10 minutes but not GERMICIDAL SUBSTANCES

Mastitis: Background, Management and Control

CORAL ESSENTIALS INFORMATION

Microbiology : antimicrobial drugs. Sheet 11. Ali abualhija

MILK COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES DURING MASTITIS

Gye and Cramer (1919) found that the ionizable salts of calcium injected together with the washed spores of Cl. tetani or of certain

Medical bacteriology Lecture 8. Streptococcal Diseases

BACTERIOLOGY OF THE HEALTHY CONJUNCTIVA*

Using SCC to Evaluate Subclinical Mastitis Cows

4.1 Treatment of Infection Antibiotics and Medicine

Inhibiting Microbial Growth in vivo. CLS 212: Medical Microbiology Zeina Alkudmani

Pharm 262: Antibiotics. 1 Pharmaceutical Microbiology II DR. C. AGYARE

Aetiological Study on Pneumonia in Camel (Camelus dromedarius) and in vitro Antibacterial Sensitivity Pattern of the Isolates

(From the Division of Laboratories of Montefiore Hospital, New York.)

DO NOT WRITE ON or THROW AWAY THIS PAPER!

تقارير الدروس العملية

No-leaching. No-resistance. No-toxicity. >99.999% Introducing BIOGUARD. Best-in-class dressings for your infection control program

Cell Wall Inhibitors. Assistant Professor Naza M. Ali. Lec 3 7 Nov 2017

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE REGENERATION OF THE LITTER BED... NATURALLY

Microbiology ( Bacteriology) sheet # 7

Meropenem for all? Midge Asogan ICU Fellow (also ID AT)

Other Beta - lactam Antibiotics

Antibacterial therapy 1. د. حامد الزعبي Dr Hamed Al-Zoubi

Determination of antibiotic sensitivities by the

Gram-positive cocci Staphylococci and Streptococcia

Mastitis Management and SCC Control in Once a Day Herds. Don Crowley- Teagasc

Essential Reef and Saltwater Fish Aquarium Tracking Forms

Post Milking Teat Disinfection. Prevention of Contagious and Environmental Mastitis

Selective Antibiotic Treatment for Dairy Cow Mastitis 1

Quad Plate User s Manual

Available online at In vitro growth inhibition of pathogenic bacteria by Solanum seaforthianum L.

had its spleen exteriorized on June 4th and the colon operation performed 8th, 1928, and the spleen exteriorized on October 18th.

Antimicrobial Resistance and Prescribing

cyst&' appeared to be of two kinds-one smaller and Smnith "is inclined to regard these epithelial cell parasites as

Walter M. Guterbock, DVM, MS Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center University of California, Davis

EcoHydra Antimicrobial Handwash. Product Overview. Physical Properties. Product Description. Regulatory Compliance. Key Features and Benefits

Observations on the Mode of Action of Antibiotic Synergism and Antagonism

F-MC-2: Dealing with Streptococcus agalactiae Mastitis

number Done by Corrected by Doctor Dr Hamed Al-Zoubi

Antibiotic Update 2.0, 2017

Burton's Microbiology for the Health Sciences. Chapter 9. Controlling Microbial Growth in Vivo Using Antimicrobial Agents

Similar to Penicillins: -Chemically. -Mechanism of action. -Toxicity.

Antibiotic Resistance

Cellulitis. Assoc Prof Mark Thomas. Conference for General Practice Auckland Saturday 28 July 2018

HOW MUCH SALT IN SALTWATER EPUB

Bacteriology. Mycology. Genova Diagnostics Europe Parkgate House 356 West Barnes Lane New Malden, Surrey. KT3 6NB. Order Number:

Mastitis in Dairy. Cattle. Oregon State System of Higher Education Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College JOHN 0.

مادة االدوية المرحلة الثالثة م. غدير حاتم محمد

Topical Antibiotic Update. Brad Sutton, O.D., F.A.A.O. Indiana University School of Optometry Indianapolis Eye Care Center No financial disclosures

Effect of omitting post-milking teat disinfection on the mastitis infection rate of dairy cows over a full lactation

Poisoning in Dogs Knowing the Risks and Steps in an Emergency

Name(s): Period: Date:

TOLYPOMYCIN, A NEW ANTIBIOTIC. V IN VITRO AND IN VIVO ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY. Masahiro Kondo, Tokiko Oishi and Kanji Tsuchiya

Antimicrobial agents. are chemicals active against microorganisms

Controlling Bacterial Growth

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

LINKAGE OF ALBINO ALLELOMORPHS IN RATS AND MICE'

VPM 201-Lab 6 Bovine Mastitis, Bacillus & Mastitis (2012)

ANTIBIOTICS USED FOR RESISTACE BACTERIA. 1. Vancomicin

Antibacterial Agents & Conditions. Stijn van der Veen

Finnzymes Oy. PathoProof Mastitis PCR Assay. Real time PCR based mastitis testing in milk monitoring programs

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

A solution for current veterinary challenges

Objectives. Basic Microbiology. Patient related. Environment related. Organism related 10/12/2017

Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO)

ANTHELMINTIC ACTIVITY OF METHYRIDINE AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL NEMATODE INFECTIONS IN MICE

Mastitis and On-Farm Milk Cultures - A Field Study - Part 1

THE MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF

Bovine Mastitis Products for Microbiological Analysis

Oxygen. Carbon Dioxide. Carbon Dioxide. Oxygen. Aquatic Plants. Fish

Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

amoxycillin/clavulanate vs placebo in the prevention of infection after animal

Microscopy Directions

SUMMARY OF PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS ON EFFICACY

Forensics Event Case Background Evidence

The Choice. V e r s a t i l i t y. S t r e n g t h. F l e x i b i l i t y. of surgeons for half a century

6.0 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CAROTENOID FROM HALOMONAS SPECIES AGAINST CHOSEN HUMAN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

CHOOSING THE BEST TEAT DIP FOR MASTITIS CONTROL AND MILK QUALITY

ANTIBIOTICS. 21 st century time bomb. By Keith Wassung

Some Antibacterial Agents Used with Koi (oz refers to weight unless otherwise specified)

Terry Talks Nutrition: Infectious microbes

SAFETY DATA SHEETS. This SDS packet was issued with item:

Felipe N. Gutierrez MD, MPH Chief, Infectious Diseases Phoenix VA Healthcare

Clorox Germicidal Wipes & Spray. The Easy & Most Effective Way to Disinfect

number Done by Corrected by Doctor Dr.Malik

Overview. There are commonly found arrangements of bacteria based on their division. Spheres, Rods, Spirals

Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial Therapy

Introduction to Chemotherapeutic Agents. Munir Gharaibeh MD, PhD, MHPE School of Medicine, The university of Jordan November 2018

E-BOOK # BACTERIAL DISEASES IN HUMANS EBOOK

PulseNet: Under the Microscope Volume 3

n Am I B I A U n IVE RS ITV OF SCIEnCE AnD TECH n 0 LOGY

Litter Management is Flock Health Management. AQUINAC MEETING November 16, 2016 Gary Hall

SYMMETRY ANTIMICROBIAL FOAMING HANDWASH with 0.3% PCMX Technical Data

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2007/48

CAT LITTER and DOG FECES: COMPOST or WASTE?

Fate and Transport of Hormones & Antimicrobials

Amoxicillin clavulanic acid spectrum

Transcription:

THE GERMICIDAL ACTION OF a-mercapto AND a-disulfo SOAPS BY ARNOLD H. EGGERTH,* PH.D. (From the Department of Bacteriology, Hoagland Laboratory, Brooklyn) (Received for publication, September 15, 193) The soaps are in many respects the most interesting of all germicides. Some of them, such as the oleate and the bromopalmitate, are among the most powerful and rapid germicides known. It is possible that certain of the soaps play an important part in the body defence against bacteria (see Flexner's introduction to Lamar, 1911). In at least one disease--leprosy--a soap has been found to have a specific chemotherapeutic value. The chief interest of the soaps, however, lies in the fact that they demonstrate to an unusual degree the phenomenon of selective germicidal action; they are, therefor, ideally suited to a study of the effect of chemical structure on such selective action. The selective action of the oleates has been known for some time (Avery, 1918). In previous studies reported by the writer (Eggerth 1926, 1929 a and b) numerous instances have been given in which one soap was highly toxic for one species of bacteria and of low toxicity for a second species, while another soap acted in just the reverse manner on the same two species. One interesting experiment may be recalled here: a mixture was made of four species of bacteria; then by employing four different soaps, any one of the four species could be killed at will without destroying the remaining three (Eggerth, 1929 b). Such a high selective action is unique among germicides. In the hope of extending our knowledge of this interesting phenomenon, the writer has prepared and tested two series of sulfurcontaining soaps: the a-mercapto and the a-disulfo soaps, which are the subject of this paper. * Van Cott Fellow, Department of Pathology, Hoagland Laboratory. 27

28 ~-MERCAPTOAND a-disulfo SOAPS Preparation of the Mercapto and Disulfo Soaps Three methods of preparing the a-mercapto fatty acids were tried: the method of Eckert and Halla (1913), which consists of refluxing the a-brom soaps with alcoholic NaSH; the method of Nicolet and Bate (1927) in which the brom fatty adds are converted to the pseudothiohydantoins by thiourea and then broken down by boiling with alkali; and the method of Lov6n and Johansson (1916), in which the brom soaps are treated with potassium xanthogenate and the resuiting compound broken down by ammonia. The best yields were obtained by the method of Lov6n and Johansson. The mercapto acids were purified by crystallization from petroleum ether; the acid with eight carbon atoms required the use of solid COs. The disulfo acids are easily prepared from the mercapto acids by oxidizing the latter with iodine in alcoholic solution, as follows: 2 RCHCOOH + 2I = RCHCOOH + 2HI S S H S R CH COOH The calculated amount of iodine is added to the mercapto acid in alcohol. The proper quantity is checked by testing with starch-potassium iodide. The disuifo acids are also crystallized from petroleum ether. The melting points of these acids were found to be as follows: Mercapto acids Disulfo adds Caprylic..... oil oil Capric... 47 C. 37 C. Lauric... 59 C. 48 C. Mydsfic... 66 C. 56 C. Palmitic... 72 C. 63 C. Stearic... 8 C. 72"C. The mercapto and disuifo acids are much stronger acids than the parent unsubstituted acids. Their soaps are therefor very little hydrolyzed by water; both sodium and potassium soaps, even of the long chained acids, are very soluble. The technic of doing the germicidal tests has been fully described in previous papers and need not be repeated here. DISCUSSION The number of carbon atoms in the molecule of these soaps markedly influences germicidal action (Tables i and 2, and Figs. I and 2). The germicidal titers increase rapidly with the length of the chain until a maximum is reached, then the titers fall off. The most active soap in the series is not always the same for the different test organ-

ARNOLD H. EGGERTH 29 No. ~carbon atoms... l a-me~cadtocaprylate TABLE 1 The Germicidal Titers of a-mercapto Soaps a-mercaptocaprate a-mercaptolaurate a-mercaptomyristate ~-Mercal~topalmitate a-mercaptostearate 8 1 12 14 16 18 Diplococcus pneumoniae ~R 6.5 ~]32 N/512 ~/81,92 ~/327,68 ~/1,24 N/25 7.5 N/16 N/256 ~/2,48 N/81,92 N/1,24 ~/512 8.5 ~/8 N/128 N/1,24 N/4,96 N/2,48 ~/512 Strep~coccushaemolyt~us 6.5 N/32 N/256 N/2,48[ N/512 N/128 N/64 7.5 N/8 N/128 N/1,24 I N/2,48 N/128 N/64 8.5 N/8 N/64 ~/1,24 N/1,24 ~/256 s/128 B. dipktkeriae 6.5 N/32 N/128 N/1,24 N/1,24 N/128 ~/64 7.5 N/8 N/64 N/1,24 N/1,24 N/128 N/64 8.5 N/4 N/64 N/512 N/1,24 N/256 N/128 3taphylococcusaureus 6.5 N/4 N/32 N/128 N/256 N/8 7.5 N/2 N/8 N/54 N/128 N/4 8.5 ~/2 N/64- N/128 N/2 Micrococcu~ovalis 6.5 N/4 N/32 N/128 N/64 O 7.5 N/2 N/8 ~/128 N/64 N/4 8.5 N/1 N/8 N/128 N/64 N/15 B. ~pisep~cus 6.5 ~/32 N/256 ~/512 N/512 O 7.5 N/8 N/64 N/256 N/256 N/4 8.5 N/8 N/54 N/128 N/256 N/15 N/8 B, meli~nsis 6.5 s/8 N/64 N/1,24 s/1,24 s/15 7.5 N/8 N/32 ~/512 N/512 N/16 8.5 ~/2 N/8 N/256 N/512 ~/32

3 a-m-ercapto AND o~-disulfo SOAPS TABLE t---concluded a-mercaptocaprylate a-mercaptocaprate a-mercaptolaurate x-mercaptomyristate a-mercaptopalmitate a-mercaptostearate 8 1 12 14 16 18 Vibrio cholera. plt 6.5 N/32 N/128 N/1,24 N/51'2 N/32 7.5 N/8 N/32 N/256 N/256 N/32 N/8 8. S N/2 N/16 N/128 N/128 N/64 N/16 B. typkosus 6.5 El4 NI4 I~14 7.5 ~/2 N/4 N/8 N/8 8.5 N/tO N/4 N/8 ~/1 B. pyocyaneus 6.5 ~/4 7.5 s/4 8.5 N/4 Time of tests, 2 hours; temperature, 37 C. isms. Thus, at ph 7.5, in the a-mercapto series (Table 1), the mercaptolaurate is the most active soap against Micr. ovalis and B. pyocyaneus; the mercaptolaurate and mercaptomyristate are equally active against B. diphtheria.e, B. lepisepticus, B. melitensis, Vibrio cholerae, and B. typhosus; while the mercaptomyristate is the most active against Diplococcus pneumoniae, Strep. haemolyticus, and Staph. aureus. In the disulfo series of soaps (Table 2), the dicaprate is most germicidal for B. lepisepticus, Vibrio cholerae, and B. typhosus; the dilaurate is most germicidal for B. diphthoriae, Staph. aureus, Micr. ovalls, and B. mdite~sis; and the dimyristate is most germicidal for Diplococcus pneumonia, and Strep. haemolyticus. With other series of soaps a similar close relationship between germicidal action and number of carbon atoms in the molecule has been shown. Thus, in the unsubstituted normal aliphatic series, the soaps with 12 and 14 carbon atoms are most germicidal; in the ~-brom series, those of 12, 14, 16, and 18 carbon atoms are most active; in the a-hydroxy series, it is those with 14 and 16 carbon atoms (Eggerth

ARNOLD H. EGGERTt:[ 31 TABLE 2 The Germicidal Titers of Disulfo Soaps ~-Disulfoclicaprylate No. of carbon atoms... 2 x 8 a-disulfodicaprate a-disulfodilaurate c~-disulfocu- [ a-disulfodimyristate r palmitate a-disulfodistearste 2xi 2x12 2x14 [ 2x16 2x18 l~plococcus pn~moniae ph 6.5 N/32 ~/256 N/4,96 N/81,92 ~/I,24 X/32 7.5 ~/16 ~/128 ~/2,48 N/81,92 ~/512 N/16 8.5 N/8 ~/128 N[I,24 N/81,92 ~/512 ~/16 Streptococcus haemolyticu~ 6.5 I N/32 ~/256 ~/2,48 };/2,48 N/16 7.5 1 N/8 ~/128 N/I,24 N/2,48 N/64 8.5 N/8 N/6~4 N/1,24 N/1,24 N/64 B. diphtkeriae 6.5 N/32 N/128 S/2,48 S/64 7. S N/8 N/64 N/1,24 N/128 N/32 8. s ~14 N132 ~11,24 ~ISt2 ~164 o Stapkylococcus aureus 6.5 ~/4 N/16 ~/128 7.5 ~/2 N/8 N/64 8.5 ~/1 ~/4 N/64 Micrococcus o~alis 6.5 N/4 ~/32 ~/128 [ 7.5 N/2 ~/16 ~/128 ~/8 I 8.5 N/1 lq/16 ~/64 };/32 B. lepisepticus 6.5 ~/32 N/25 N/32 7.5 ~/8 ~/64 ~/16 ~/4 8.5 ~/8 ~/64 ~/16 ~/8 B. melitensis 6.5 N/8 ~/64 N/256 N/64 7.5 ~/2 N/32 N/256 N/32 8.5 lq/2 N/8 ~/64 ~/32

32 tx=mercapto AND ~-DISULFO SOAPS a-disulfodicapryhtte TABLE 2--Conduded a-disulfodicaprate a-disulfodilaurate a-disutfodimyristate a-disulfodipalmitate ~-Disulfodi. stearate [o. of carbon atoms... 2x8 2x1 2x12 2x14 2x16 2x18 ptl Vibrio cholerae 6.5 N/32 N/128 NIl6 7.5 N/4 N/iS N/4 8. S N/4 N/8 N/2 B. typhosus 6.5 ] 7.5 N/2 l 8.5 B. pyocyaneus 6.5 7.5 8.5 Time of tests, 2 hours; temperature, 37 C../1z4 n14," ~ "' sj / 8 1 12 14 16 18 8 I 12 14 15 is 1 12 14 16 Number of cacbon atoms in chain Dip1ococr.~ p~x~'aor,.iao S'l.al~. aureu~ 15. teptbepttc~ FIG. I. The germicidal titers of e-mercapto soaps (A), a-disulfo soaps (B), and of unsubstituted saturated soaps (C). The soaps are designated by the number of carbon atoms in their molecule. Time of test, 2 hours; temperature, 37 C.; the ph is 7.5.

ARNOLD H. EGGERTH 33 1926, 1929 a and b). In an extensive study of numerous cyclo alkyl acetic and dialkyl acetic soaps, Adams and his associates (numerous papers appearing since 1926 in the Journal of the American Chemical Society) have shown that maximal germicidal activity toward B. leprae occurs in soaps having 16, 17, or 18 carbon atoms. From the forgoing it seems probable that the following general rule will apply to all soaps: in any homologous series of soaps, germicidal action increases rapidly with the number of carbon atoms in the chain, up to a maximum, after which it diminishes. The point at which this maximum occurs varies with the chemical structure of the soap and with the test organism. As has been previously suggested by the writer (Eggerth 1929 a) it seems probable that two main factors determine the germicidal action of a soap: its ability to penetrate into the bacterial cell, and its toxic action upon the bacterial protoplasm after it has penetrated. As the number of carbon atoms in the soap molecule increases, the toxicity becomes greater but the power to penetrate into the cell diminishes. As long as molecular size does not prevent entrance of the soap into the cell, germicidal action will increase with molecular weight; eventually a point is reached where the moleucle is so large it cannot readily enter the cell, and germicidal action is diminished. The effect of the ph upon the germicidal action of soaps has been repeatedly noted and discussed by the writer elsewhere (Eggerth 1926, 1929 a and b). Study of the present series does not add anything new to our knowledge on that subject. As the ph often modifies the germicidal titer a great deal, it is obviously necessary that strict attention be paid to it in conducting these tests. As it is impossible to predict in any particular case just what will be the effect of a change in ph upon the soap titer, it is desirable to test out several ph values. The effect of the introduction of the SH group into the soap molecule is brought out in Table 3 and in Fig. 2. Table 3 shows that the introduction of this group into the myristate radicle markedly increases germicidal action for most of the organisms tested; with B. lepisepticus, the titer is not changed; with B. pyocyaneus, it is diminished. Compared with the corresponding brom soap, which it somewhat resembles, it is found to be twice as germicidal for Diplococcus pneumoniae, Strep. haemolyticus, B. diphtheriae, Vibrio cholerae, B.

34 a-m-ercapto AND ol-disulfo SOAPS melitensis, and B. typhosus; with the other test organisms in this series, it is less germicidal than the brom soap. Fig. 2 shows that the a-mercaptomyristate is a very powerful germicide, comparing favorably with any other soap tested by the writer. It is curious that the mercaptopalmitate and -stearate should be such feeble germicides; these soaps are readily soluble in water and titers comparable with the bromopalmitates and -stearates were expected. The titers of the disulfo soaps bear an interesting relationship to those of the mercapto soaps. On comparing Table 2 with Table 1, it will be observed that with the lower members of this series, the TABLE 3 Tke Germicidal Titers of Potassium Myris~te, Potassium,~-Bromomyris~te, Potassium a-mercaptomyristate, and Potassium a-disulfodimyristate Test organism Diflococc~ tmeumoniae... Streptococcus kaeraolyticus... B. dip ktkeriae... Slapkylococcus aureus... Micrococcus ovalis... Vibrio ckolerae... B. raelitensis... B. lepisepticus... B. typkosus... B. pyocyaneus... Myristate =-BromomyrlState a-merc~ptomyristate tz-disulfodimyristate s/256 N/64 s/32 s/16 N/4 ~/16 ~/32 ~/256 N/4 N/4,96 N/1,24 N/512 N/512 N/256 N/128 N/256 N/S12 N/2 N/2 All tests at ph 7.5; time, 2 hours; temperature, 37 C. ~/81,92! ~/2,48 N/1,24 N/128 ~/64 N/256 N/512 N/256 N/8 N/81,92 N/2,48 ~/128 N/8 N/32 ~/4 titers are usually identical with those of the corresponding mercapto soaps; the higher members are consistently weaker germicides. In no case are the titers of the disulfo soaps higher than the corresponding mercapto soaps. This suggests that, because of their higher molecular weight, the disulfo soaps penetrate less readily; and that those that do enter the bacterial cell are promptly reduced to the mercapto form. Examination of Fig. 2 brings out what is one of the most interesting facts among the soaps; their highly selective action. In this figure, only the most active and characteristic members of each soap series are given. It will be observed that no two bacterial species run the

ARNOLD R'. EGGERTH 35 same titers with these soaps; conversely, no two soaps give the same titers with these ten test organisms. While certain organisms re- v.,jlliljlill n/4.96 /5,12! n/64 '~.IIII, II I nao, g6o n/{i, t2.11 I, III[I nl~g6 n/,%l~o.ll]ll.ll II tv~,12 n/64o n/8o n/5,12 n/64 rv'bo nt~n6t~t2 ill' -,liili.lill..li.i! o,-,i,11,i,i, n/~a2o n/b4 n/~o I n/bo i _ I - - - I. I n/64./8o..,ll... I Dip1. pneom. h~m~ B.~pt~ Storm. atwe~ lq'le.r. ~,~,- V. chol B. typh. B pyocy FIG. 2. The germicidal titers of various soaps, showing selective germicidal action. The titers for phenol are included for comparison. The titers of the first nine soaps are taken from previous papers (Eggerth, 1926, 1929 a and b). Time of tests, 2 hours; temperature, 37 C.; the ph is 7.5 except where otherwise indicated. semble each other in their soap titers (Strep. haemolyticus and B. diphtheriae; B. melitensis and V. cholera, e), yet certain soaps have always

36 o~-mercapto AND o~-disul~'o SOAPS clearly distinguished between them. Thus, a-hydroxymyristate is 4 times, and a-disulfodimyristate is 8 times as toxic for Slrep. haemolyticus as for B. diphtheriae; while a-hydroxypalmitate and -stearate, in 18 hours, are 32 times as toxic for B. diphtheriae as for Strep. haemolyticus (not shown in Fig. 2; see Eggerth, 1929 b). Such selective reactions should be of use in classifying, isolating, and identifying bacteria. Some work in the direction has been done in this laboratory: cultures of anaerobes and Sporotrichum have been freed from contaminating cocci by using bromopalmitate agar; sodium oleate has been used to distinguish between Micr. ovalis (called Strep. recalls by many authors) and other streptococci; a probable biological relationship between Micr. zymogenes and Micr. ovalis has been demonstrated, as they run very similar soap fiters. Avery's oleatehaemoglobin agar used in isolating B. influemae is, of course, widely known. Other applications of this selective germicidal action of soaps remain to be worked out. SUMA~ARY AND CONCLUSIONS I. Certain of the a.mercapto soaps and ~-disulfo soaps are powerful germicides. 2. In the a-mercapto series, those soaps with 12 and 14 carbon atoms are most germicidal. In the disulfo series, the dicaprate, dilaurate, and dimyristate are most germicidal. The optimum number of carbon atoms varies with the test organism used. 3. These soaps, like others previously studied, show a markedly selective germicidal action. BIBLIOGRAPHY Avery, O. T., J. Am. Med. Ass., 1918, 71, 25. Eckert, A., and Halla, O., Monatsh. J. Chemie, 1913, 34, 1811. Eggerth, A. H., J. Gen. Physiol., 1926, 1, 147; J. Exp. Med., (a) 1929, 49, 53, and (b) 1929, 5, 299. Lamar, R. V., J. Exp. Med., 1911, 13, 1. Lov6n, J. M., and Johansson, H., Ber. chem. Ges., 1916, 48, 1254. Nicolet, B. H., and Bate, L. F., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1927, 49, 264.