CITY OF COOS BAY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Tuesday, May 13, 2014 at 6:00 P.M. Coos Bay City Hall, 500 Central Avenue, Coos Bay

Similar documents
A MODEL TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE: RAISING AND KEEPING OF CHICKENS 1

5 September 10, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

December 10, 2018 Planning Board Meeting Page

TOWNSHIP OF WILKINS ORDINANCE NO.:

CITY OF ESCONDIDO MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ESCONDIDO PLANNING COMMISSION. April 8, 2014

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento

A regular meeting of the Village of Victor Planning Board was held on Wednesday, May 25, 2016, at the Village Hall, 60 East Main Street.

Planning and Zoning Staff Report for Ekard Conditonal Use Permit CU

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

Washoe County Animal Control Board

2 August 8, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER: BARBARA L. TYNES

Planning and Zoning Staff Report for Grant Settle Conditonal Use Permit - PH2018-8

ORDINANCE # WHEREAS, backyard and urban chickens eat noxious weeds and insects; and

STRONGSVILLE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MINUTES OF MEETING August 15, 2017

Washoe County Animal Control Board

REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ST. CLOUD PLANNING COMMISSION. A meeting of the St. Cloud Planning Commission was held on April 14, 2009, at 7 p.m.

NOTICE OF DECISION BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER. c/o Bruce Lisser P. O. Box 1109 Mount Vernon, WA 98273

FRANCISCAN VILLAGE ANIMAL OWNERSHIP RULES

Service and Assistance Animals Policy & Procedure

APPEAL CASE A- Broadview Acres Canine Resort; and APPEAL CASE A-Continued-Watch Ur Paws.

City of Palo Alto (ID # 8779) City Council Staff Report

ANNUAL PERMIT TO KEEP CHICKENS

BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

County of San Mateo Planning and Building Department REGULATIONS FOR KENNELS/CATTERIES

BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUNSET VALLEY, TEXAS:

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING WORTHINGTON ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD WORTHINGTON MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION October 11, 2018

ORDINANCE NO

11/03/2018. To the City of Del Mar Planning Commission:

MINUTES TOWN BOARD MEETING AUGUST 20, 2018

WHEREAS, the concept of local sustainability has inspired an interest in backyard and community food production to provide local food sources, and

MANSFIELD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, October 3, 2016

TOWN OF BELMONT, NH PLANNING BOARD

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.

BRANDON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD HEARING DECEMBER 6, 2018 CONDITIONAL USE #5984 APPLICANT: FWR, INC. LANDOWNER: CHUCK MITCHELL

ORDINANCE NO THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DODGEVILLE, IOWA COUNTY, WISCONSIN, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting Monday, December 3, :00 PM City Hall Council Chambers. MINUTES Approved 3/4/2019

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

CHAPTER 3 POLICE REGULATIONS 343. LIMITATIONS ON THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS AS PETS

Pet Policy of the Stonehenge Subdivision

Kathleen Roberts, Carl Opatrny, Mayor Hruby, Kim Veras, Bruce McCrodden, Dennis Rose

Francis City Planning Commission Meeting Thursday May 5, 2016

BARRE TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES

2015 RESOLUTION NO. R Official Resolution of the Board of Commissioners Macomb County, Michigan

Office of Residence Life Pet Friendly Community - Procedures

CHICKEN LICENSE a Small-scale Chicken Flock

PORT MALABAR HOLIDAY PARK MOBILE HOME PARK RECREATION DISTRICT 215 Holiday Park Boulevard NE Palm Bay, Florida

Cuyahoga County Board of Health Animal Venue Regulation

GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY ASSISTANCE ANIMAL POLICY

Public Hearing Conditional Use Permit request by Krapu for a Dog Kennel August 30, 2004 reconvened September 7, 2004 Eureka Town Hall

CHICKEN LICENSE a Small-scale Chicken Flock

The requested zoning amendment is to allow for day sitting of dogs and domestic cats as a Home Occupation.

NORTH STRABANE TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD **MINUTES** June 1, 2016

SHIAWASSEE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD MINUTES WEDNESDAY, APRIL 24, 2013

Policy Number: ACAD-102/STUD-102 Policy Approved: July Policy Superseded: NA Review/Revision(s): August 2011; July 2013

City of South St. Paul Dakota County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 1297

Goodhue County Land Use Management

GALLATIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NO GALLATIN COUNTY DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE

Village of East Dundee PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES Committee of the Whole Monday, August 10, :05 PM

STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL OR STUDY SESSION AGENDA. STUDY SESSION DATE: NA MEETING DATE: October 4, 2010

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF CLARK, SECTION 1. Title 10, Chapter 08, Section 130 of the Clark County Code is hereby

This chapter will be known as the "Dogs and Other Animals Control Local Law of the Town of Skaneateles."

PET POLICY COMMON HOUSEHOLD PETS ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

Chapter 190 URBAN CHICKEN

SUMMARY: An ordinance amending the Washoe County Code by revising provisions relating to dangerous dogs. BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

TRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY. Service and Emotional Support Animal Policy

Request Conditional Use Permit (Commercial Kennel) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Marchelle Coleman

Referred to Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

CITY OF PLYMOUTH DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING PLYMOUTH CITY HALL Thursday, February 8, 2018, 7 p.m.

Grand Rapids Housing Commission Ransom Tower Pet and Service Animal Policy

ORDINANCE NO. hundreds of thousands of dogs and cats are housed and bred at substandard breeding

PASCO COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE QUARTERLY MEETING February 11, 2015 MINUTES

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Official Lake County Planning Commission Minutes Law Enforcement Center October 16, 2017

BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS AND ORDER OF REMAND

CASE NUMBER: 18SN0724 APPLICANTS: David John and Debra E. Sirois CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA MATOACA DISTRICT

2018 Urban Hens Pilot Registration

Porter County Board of Zoning Appeals. Regular Meeting Minutes June 21, 2017

Chapter 60. Animals. Article I. Dogs. Article II. Cats Prohibited Conduct Definitions License

ORDINANCE ARTICLE 2: DEFINITIONS. Amend the definition of Agriculture and add the following definitions:

Reasons: Why consider allowing backyard chickens in the urban and suburban areas of Saanich?

CITY COUNCIL APRIL 3, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING

LOCATION OF PETS WITHIN THE BUILDING

Thriving in College Station

Service Animal Procedure, Student and Community Procedure

Emotional Support Animal

LOCAL LAW NO. 1 DOG CONTROL LAW OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CHOCOLAY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, September 19, 2016

TITLE 5 ANIMALS ANIMALS 1

VILLAGE OF RICHTON PARK COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO.

Clementina Arroyo Glenn Barnett Frank Bodeman Daniel Hutchinson Veronica Martinez Bruce Richetts Margaret Whelan

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, COUNTY OF UPSHUR, CITY OF BUCKHANNON, TO WIT:

ocpetinfo.com (714) Tips for owners of Barking Dogs:. The key to silencing barking is understanding

Outdoor Bark Control

A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF LANGHAM TO REGULATE & LICENSE DOGS AND CATS

UNLISTED ACCESSORY USE DETERMINATION: OUTDOOR OFF-LEASH DOG ENCLOSURE ACCESSORY TO EATING PLACE

An individual may request an emotional support animal as an accommodation in a campus residential facility if:

Transcription:

CITY OF COOS BAY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Tuesday, May 13, 2014 at 6:00 P.M. Coos Bay City Hall, 500 Central Avenue, Coos Bay DRAFT ATTENDANCE COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: STAFF: SIGNED-IN GUESTS: Chairman Chris Hood, Commissioners Jim Berg, Christine Coles, Bruce Harlan, Phil Marler and Rex Miller Commissioner Jeff Marineau Eric Day, Director of Community Development Debbie Erler, Planner Aaron Harris, Planner None APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of the Planning Commission minutes of April 8, 2014 MOTION: Commissioner Coles- Approve the Planning Commission minutes of April 8, 2014 as submitted. SECOND: Commissioner Miller VOTE: Unanimous ABSTAIN: Commissioner Phil Marler CCI/PUBLIC COMMENTS Don Hinerman, 1185 Salmon Avenue, Coos Bay, informed the Planning Commission that the roof structures on the Boardwalk are in need of repair/maintenance. He said the roofs are buckling and warped. PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM B: Architectural Design Review Application #187-ZON14-032 - 997 Newmark Avenue, Coos Bay, Oregon 97420. The applicant is requesting approval to make alterations to the existing canopy over the gas pumps (including signage) and replace/relocate the existing pole mounted sign. Chairman Hood asked if there were any objections to the Planning Commission hearing the item on jurisdictional grounds. He asked if any Planning Commissioner had ex parte contact or conflict of interest to report. No objections were made and no Commissioners announced ex parte contacts. Chairman Hood opened the public hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 1

Debbie Erler read the disclosure statement and outlined the applicant s request. The applicant is requesting approval to make alterations to the existing canopy and replace the signage on the canopy and over the gas pumps. They also propose to replace/relocate the existing pole mounted sign to reflect the new brand Chevron and paint the booth to match the new color scheme. The Design Assistance Team (DAT) reviewed the proposed changes and recommended the request be approved. The DAT thought the overall change was an improvement to the visual impacts on the property. The DAT did have a concern with individual canned letters and logo, when the updated canopy has down lighting on the fascia. Ryan Baker, 1227 South Cobb Street, Roseburg, Oregon, indicated he is representing the applicant. Mr. Baker submitted a revised pole mounted sign plan to include diesel fuel. Mr. Baker outlined the applicant s request. He requested that the canned light on the canopy fascia be allowed to be lighted. Chairman Hood closed the public hearing. The Planning Commission discussed the proposed changes. They determined that the proposed change to the color scheme and the proposed signage is an improvement. They agreed that because the existing canopy is lighted over the pump area, lighting the proposed signage over the gas pumps would not add a significant amount of lighting. Commissioner Harlan stated that he attended the DAT meeting and he agrees with their recommendation. He noted that the revision just submitted would put the bottom of the pole mounted sign below eight feet above grade. Ms. Erler stated that because the proposed pole location is in a landscaped area and not in a pedestrian pathway or right of way would be permitted. Commissioner Hood verified with the owner s representative that no portion of the pole mounted sign will extend over the sidewalk. Mr. Baker confirmed that the sign structure does not extend into the right of way. Commissioner Marler asked what problem the DAT had with the fascia lighting on the canopy. Commissioner Harlan stated that since the fascia was already lighted, lighting the individual letters canned letter and the logo was not necessary. Ms. Erler added that since the canned letters stand out from the fascia the fascia light would not light the canned letters/logo, but the applied letters would be lit by the fascia lighting. The Commission discussed the interior illuminated signage and exterior lighted signage. They noted that companies with exterior lighted signs are experiencing problems with the wind continually damaging the bulbs, causing a maintenance/replacement issue. Commissioner Marler stated that there is so much light on the property already, that he believes additional lighted canned lights on the fascia would not even be noticed. MOTION: Commissioner Harlan - Based on the findings, conclusions, Design Assistance Team recommendation and the applicant s submittal, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, approve Architectural Design Review Application #187-ZON14-032 at 997 Newmark Avenue as revised, allowing signage, lighting and color changes as follows: 1. Replace/relocate the existing interior illuminated pole mounted signage as proposed with the addition of Diesel added and the height above grade to 5.66 feet above the existing landscape area; PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 2

2. Replace the existing canopy ACM (Aluminum Composite Material) fascia material from the 76 image with new ACM material in Chevron image colors. The fascia on the east and west elevation will include a blue stripe at the bottom. The fascia on the north and south elevation will be blue with LED down lighting at the top; 3. Replace the canopy signage on the east and west elevation with Hallmark logo (red and blue bow tie) 22 inches in height as proposed without interior illumination or change proposed signage to pressure sensitive vinyl material; 4. Replace the canopy signage on the north and south elevation with individual white Chevron letters 21 inches in height as proposed without interior illumination or change proposed signage to pressure sensitive vinyl material. 5. Replace existing non-illuminated sign panels over each set of gas pumps with larger interior illuminated signage with Chevron color scheme as proposed; 6. Change the color of the existing booth from white with a red boarder to stone grey and white and change the existing bollards from red to white with safety reflective tape at the top. SECOND: Commissioner Berg DISCUSSION: Ms. Erler asked for clarification that the motion is to approve as discussed with the lighted individual canned letters/log or as recommended by staff. Commissioner Harlan and Chairman Hood verified that the motion was to approved as revised with the diesel signage and as noted in the staff s recommendation. VOTE: Unanimous ITEM A: Conditional Use #187-ZON14-023 1165 Newmark Avenue STE B, Coos Bay, Oregon 97420. The applicant is requesting approval for a cat and dog animal kennel on the above referenced property, located in the General-Commercial (C-2) zoning district. Animal kennels are a conditionally permitted use within this zone. Chairman Hood asked if there were any objections to the Planning Commission hearing the item on jurisdictional grounds. He asked if any Planning Commissioner had ex parte contact or conflict of interest to report. No objections were made and no Commissioners announced ex parte contacts. Chairman Hood opened the public hearing. Aaron Harris read the disclosure statement and outlined the applicant s request. The applicant is requesting approval for a cat and dog animal kennel on the above referenced property, located in the General-Commercial (C-2) zoning district. Animal kennels are a conditionally permitted use within this zone. Mr. Harris provided with Planning Commission with letters of support and objection received just before the hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 3

Tamara McCuistion, 132 N Wasson St., Coos Bay, Oregon 97420, apologized for the last minute submits of support. They were just informed there was a letter opposing the project and they wanted to show support for the project. Ms. McCuistion introduced the volunteers and foster family members that were in attendance. She stated that their web site had about 2,500 friends and community supports. Their overall approval rating is 4.7. She explained the difference between Oregon and California s rate of euthanized animals and that the hope is to have no animals euthanized in the near future. Ms. McCuistion stated they do transport dogs from California and other groups help pay the transport cost. She said the dogs that are coming in are helping to keep the doors open. She stated that during transport all crates have chewy toys and they stop for food and water and to walk the dogs on a regular base. She said a drive that is usually 12 hours takes them about 18 hours. Ms. McCuistion stated that at the existing clinic on North Wasson they have had complaints regarding barking dogs, but that the barking is from other dogs in the neighborhood. She described the different levels/types of controlling barking, including no bark collars and stop that spray. She said they also work with the animals. If there continues to be a barking problem, the animal is removed from the location. Ms. McCuistion stated the goal is to get the animals ready for adoption. Commissioner Coles stated she is concerned about the cleanness of the kennel facility and the effect on the abutting businesses and surrounding neighborhood. Ms. McCuistion explained what services are provided at the existing clinic in regards to local cats and dogs. She also explained the services provided to the animals that are transported to the facility to get them ready for adoption or foster families. She explained the proposed improvement to the new facility regarding the flooring and existing air conditioning unit and the proposed ventilation system. Ms. McCuistion stated the animals at the proposed facility will not be kenneled and they will only have three large dogs at a time. There is about a 10 x 16 foot area allotted to each large dog. She said volunteers will walk the dogs in the residential area on the south side of Salmon Avenue. She stated there is a strip of grass between the curb on each side and an L shaped landscape area on the property. She said the volunteers have been informed that all dog feces is to be picked up and properly disposed. Commissioner Marler stated if he was one of the property owners on Salmon he would be concerned about the dog walking activity, since they are responsible to keep the undeveloped right of way maintained. He said the number of dogs being walked in one area will create a problem and smell. Commissioner Harlan expressed concern for the surrounding property owners because of the number of dogs being walked in the area multiple times a day. Ms. McCuistion explained that the animals are currently being housed with foster families. She said the current shelter has limited hours and is not very accessible due to the location. They do not intend to house the number of animals stated in the land use application, but they want the option should the need arise. She said she talked with the groomer located in the facility and she supports the proposal. They currently trade services. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 4

Rhonda Adams, 649 S 11 th Street, Coos Bay and Savanna, stated they work at the existing S/Nipped facility and there is never a sick dog smell and they keep the facility clean. They stated they foster animals and help with adoptions. They said S/Nipped provides the community with free services, including spay/neuter of feral cats. Savanna added that the strip mall where they want to locate is a good area. The dogs could be walked in the area abutting the facility and kept out of the residential area, and noise would not be a problem. It was added that they will still have foster families. Kitty Tilton, 90780 Sanddollar, Coos Bay stated that dogs don t need grass to use the bathroom and there is no reason to use the neighbor s grass strips. Commissioner Miller stated his company mows landscape areas every day and they find dog feces in grass, not in the mulch. He said a grass area should be created and they may want to look into a street vacation to open up more area for grass. Rita Holder, 93592 Ranch Lane, Coos Bay, stated the new facility will be a good place to allow families an area to bond with animals. Commissioner Berg stated that the Planning Commission must consider the impact on abutting properties and considering all issues. LaDonna Hinerman, 1185 Salmon, Coos Bay, submitted photos of the neighborhood (Exhibit 1). She said they have lived in the area for 19 years. She said the entire street is occupied by renters, so they did not get notice. She said she talked to everyone in the strip mall and found that the groomer is not in favor of the project and the gentleman in the front did not care. She said she walked in front of the pet grooming business and could hear baking dogs. She stated there is not a sidewalk. The area of landscape on the property they are talking about is very small, barked and heavily vegetated. She said there are not that many dogs in the area and even if they only walk a couple dogs at a time the smell of urine will become a problem. She concluded that she has nothing against the group but she is concerned that this is not a good area and the smell and barking will be a problem. Commissioner Berg asked if someone will be at the facility all night. Ms. McCuistion stated that no one will be at the facility at night, but there will be a contact number to report barking complaints and they will respond to the complaint. Chairman Hood closed the public hearing. The Planning Commission discussed the need for the facility within the City limits, as opposed to the current facility, with more hours of operation. Chairman Hood stated if other businesses in the commercial complex have a problem with the kennel (noise/smell), they will report it to the property owner and he will need to resolve the issues. He believes the residential properties are located at such a distance that any barking should not be an issue. Commissioner Berg stated that if a nuisance is created by the use, the City has a method in the Coos Bay Municipal Code to deal with the concern or violation. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 5

MOTION: Commissioner Coles - Based on the findings, conclusions and applicant s submittal, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, approve Conditional Use application #187-ZON14-023 allowing a cat and dog animal kennel at 1165 Newmark Street STE B, Coos Bay, subject to the following Conditions: 1. A maximum of 22 dogs and 8 cats may be kept on-site overnight. 2. The applicant shall adhere to, and remain in compliance with, all city, county, and state codes and licenses that pertain to the conditional use of animal shelters. 3. Litter and fecal matter shall be removed from the site. The site shall be cleaned as needed and on a continual basis to mitigate odor. 4. The applicant shall adhere to all city, county, and state codes that pertain to unreasonable noise. SECOND: Commissioner Berg VOTE: Yea: Chairman Hood, Commissioners Berg, Coles, Harlan and Miller Nay: Commissioner Marler DEVELOPMENT CODE (CBMC, Title 17) REWRITE Director Day explained the proposed re-write of the development code. He said the first code section under review is Administrative Provisions. He explained the time constraints of the grant and the proposed schedule of review. Director Day explained what type of applications would be grouped in the Type 1 through IV land use actions. Commissioner Coles stated she would like more than a week to review the packet or to schedule a work session. Director Day explained the intent of the re-write includes eliminating unused zoning designations (like the Buffer Zone) and consolidate other zoning categorizations where appropriate. He proposes to expand the notice area for most application types to 300 feet. Commissioner Berg stated he would like to see the land use process streamlined and to have more decisions made at the staff level. Commissioner Coles stated that once this process is completed, she would like to see the City s comprehensive plan updated. Director Day agreed that it is outdated and that he would like to complete a comprehensive plan update in the next couple years. Commissioner Hood stated where appropriate on page 6 needs to be removed. Director Day agreed. Commissioner Hood asked about the R-5 and R-3 zones. Commissioner Marler asked about uses in the R-4P zone. Director Day stated that an objective of the re-write is to combine residential zones where applicable. He said the zoning districts will be the next section under review. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 6

Director Day stated that specialized zoning, like Hollering Place, will not be altered. He plans to combine some of the commercial zones and eliminate most of the Q designated zones. Commissioner Marler stated he would be concerned about unintended consequence especially in regards to lenders in regards to residential uses in commercial zones. COMMISSION COMMENTS None ADMINISTRATIVE None ADJOURNMENT 8:20 p.m. Chris Hood, Chairman City of Coos Bay Coos County, Oregon ATTEST: Debbie Erler, Planner City of Coos Bay PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 13, 2014 PAGE 7